1

The Lounge / Re: Why JJ fails.

« on: January 05, 2008, 08:44:30 PM »

Jj has one simple purpose, to troll. You may think this means he is a good troll, because of how many responses he gets. That is not the sole purpose of a troll. a) a troll is not supposed to be understood by the victims of trolling b) trolls are supposed to be perceived as funny to those who get them


Jj is understood by all to be a troll. He uses the same tactics a five year old uses when he wants attention. He screams bad things till the grown ups decide enough is enough and yell at him

The other reason Jj fails is he is not funny in the least. The people "falling victim" to the troll are the ones laughing. The only thing that irritates me is that he is now going into too many topics with his retarded act. The fact that engy does not try to control him in the least is a tragedy. He threatened to, and then did ban decent trolls like Gulliver. If he held the same standards to JJ he did to Gulliver then JJ would be gone yesterday.

JJ had a time and a season, and needs to just die off. If he won't roll over and die someone should really help him along the way and ban him.

(Insert JJ's or CSD's comment about my dad or me being poor or something of the ilk. Maybe a mental midget insult, such variety now days huh?)

JJ wins dumb fuck....You just wrote how many paragraphs?? You started a thread which got everyones attention??? JJ wins because who is the banned member writing this?? Now would you try swallowing my balls?

With all due kindness, (see I said I would be good)

JJJ

2

The Lounge / Re: Flat Earth Senior Members

« on: January 05, 2008, 08:20:33 PM »

How does it not get bored of using the same lame insults over and over again?

I thought that one was original shit stain

3

The Lounge / Re: Flat Earth Senior Members

« on: January 05, 2008, 08:17:00 PM »

Saddam wants to be a mod.

I believe you should be the moderator of my cock!!!! You suck it and I will tell you if you are doing a good job!

JJJ

4

The Lounge / Re: Flat Earth Senior Members

« on: January 05, 2008, 08:13:14 PM »

Hey guys, I'm making a "Flat Earth Seniors" forum where no trolls will bother us.

My question: Should the forums require a password, and if so, PM me some ideas for passwords.

I have several ideas for passwords for the forums!!!! Lets do passwords like: Trekkys mom is a whore, Midnight likes it up the ass, Raist has no balls, Raist sucks dick, Raist spews cum from the corner of his mouth, Engy is a gutless little fuck, Engy thinks he is the internet police, Engys old lady sucks my cock good!, Engys old lady likes it up the ass,

Hows those suggestions?

JJJ

5

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: Why Time does not Exist

« on: January 05, 2008, 07:24:56 PM »

Why Time does not Exist

The concept of time is probably the most misconstrued and misused concept in science. Most scientists as well as the public think that
“time” actually exists, just like the physical dimensions of length. Some have gone so far as to even give these “particles of time” the name
“chronons.” Many of the so-called reputable journals even publish articles by these ignorant practitioners of voodoo science.

You should have heard the gasps from a presentation on time to a group of scientists when I told them that time did not exist. It was like I
had blasphemed their sacred religion. Let me try to explain the concept of time so that you can go forth and spread the factual truth to those
with open minds:

The concept of “time” is actually quite primitive with early man recognizing that their were repeated cycles of natural events which could
be used to measure the duration of other events. From the recognizing that the four seasons were such a repetitive cycle, to that of a cycle of
day/night, which we later came to understand was one revolution of the Earth about its axis. Then came the falling of sand in an hourglass
to the repetitious swing of a pendulum, and currently to the oscillation of a quartz crystal.

From all of these definitions of a “unit” of time, we have been able to artificially divide it. The most basic subdivision is that of a second
which is 1/3600 of one revolution of the Earth, which we have most recently defined as 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation
corresponding to the transition between two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the cesium - 133 atom. The smaller the repetitive natural
event that we can measure, the more accurate our measurement of time can be.

But in all of this where is Time as a physical entity. Nowhere. All we have done is to define the duration of a physical event.
Einstein really screwed up most everyone’s perspective with his erroneous use of time and reference (the subject of my next editorial).
After his Theories of Relativity, everyone thought they could go and measure time like one would measure the length of a box with a
yardstick. I’m not saying that the concept of time does not have a purpose in the measuring of a single event by comparing it to the number
of repetitive cycles of a naturally occurring event (i.e. the time it takes me to run a 40 yard dash to the number of quartz oscillations in my
stopwatch).

Then how can time work in Einstein’s formulas. It works in the same way that gravity does. Neither gravity (or its “gravitons”) nor time
(or its “chronons”) exist as discrete entities. Gravity is nothing but the reactive force from Space to its displacement by matter. Likewise
Space and its density cause what we see in the relative variations of the duration of these repetitive naturally occurring events. The more
dense that Space is, the slower time is. This is why time slows down as gravity increases.

If one really needed a true concept of time, the best that I could give would be the linear duration of the lifecycle of the universe. This
would be the only true time absolute that is not affected by the density of Space, as all time in this universe would have the same starting
and ending point. Any subdivision would therefore be allowable. The problem is that we being the ignorant mortals that we are do not
know the duration of the universe’s lifecycle (someday with better technology and theory we can do so based upon the expansion and
contraction rates).

Therefore the best definition of time using its current understanding would be: “Time as a physical entity does not exist but we have
utilized this concept to make relative comparisons of event durations to that of repetitive and reproducible naturally occurring
cycles or subdivisions thereof.” But I would like to take time beyond that to my practical definition of time.

What is the only true constant in this universe besides its lifecycle? The speed of light of course. Time can be easily defined as, “The
duration that it takes a photon to travel a preset distance divided by the speed of light.” The smaller that we can define the distance
that a photon travels, the smaller the unit of time that we can measure. With this definition, there is virtually no limit to how infinitesimally
small of a unit that we can measure. Also we are not limited by using repetitious natural event for our measurement.

In summary, time as a physical entity does not exist, rather it is a means for comparing the duration of an event to the duration of another
which is considered the reference standard. Optimally, this reference standard should be the duration that it takes light to travel a preset
distance, as this would finally make sense out of our reference standards as we would have the same definition for distance and time: t=d/c
and d=c/t.*

James P. Siepmann

*Though NIST currently uses the standard of d=c/t for the meter, it has alas failed to make the next logical step of using the same concept
for time (t=d/c). Maybe someday they will listen…


I saw it and thought it'd be a fun copy/paste.

You need not explain that you copied and pasted this, it is evident that you are a stupid son-of-a-bitch. this is more your speed: what's black and white and read all over?

6

The Lounge / Re: Ultimate Democratic 2008 Election

« on: January 05, 2008, 06:58:23 PM »

Gravel is my favorite, but he is pretty much a wasted vote, so my vote is probably going to Obama to make sure he wins over Clinton.

did you ever pay your mommy her money back you borrowed to move your stinking as to florida?

7

The Lounge / Re: Ultimate Democratic 2008 Election

« on: January 05, 2008, 06:11:40 PM »

If Bush has his way, he'll be President for life.  But hopefully, he won't.

Hey you fucking imbecile, got ANY clue on how term limits work? Maybe you should start at the beginning by reading the Federalist Papers. This will give you, maybe, a clue and improve your limited knowledge.

8

The Lounge / Re: JJ is back!

« on: January 05, 2008, 06:03:04 PM »

HOLY SHIT! 
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=12963

That's Jesus Jones Jr., ass-rag. my daddy is letting me take over.

9

The Lounge / Re: "Diagnosis Midnight"

« on: January 05, 2008, 05:51:04 PM »

I want a full-blown extrapolation, in your own words, on what I am, who I am, and what I represent. I am curious, but not intoning a need for approval. I would like to hear the hoopla.

What am I?

You are a egocentric asshole, enough said.