1
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Venus/Mercury/Iss-Atlantis Sun Transit - True distance Earth - Sun
« on: February 13, 2008, 04:23:34 AM »
Can't believe I missed this thread, tis a classic. Levee, you are totally bonkers, it's great 
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Flat Earth Debate / Re: plate tectonics
« on: November 29, 2007, 03:14:37 AM »Nice, what a strong argument you got there.it's true though
3
Flat Earth Debate / Re: plate tectonics
« on: November 29, 2007, 02:09:20 AM »Jack, you really are a sad little frustrated boy. Get a life.So, your "plate" that the ice wall sits on covers the whole of the underside of the earth too?Do you not understand the legends? That is the crust, and the "plate" is part of the crust, just like the plates on a round Earth.I can't comprehend your picture because it's utter dross. End of. Go back to school.Then it's your problem that you can't comprehend pictures. Now, go back and revise plate tectonics. Actually, based on your reasoning, literacy, and comprehensive skills, I can only assume you're still a high school student. Get that high school geography textbook and read.
4
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: bishop has a problem with his stories
« on: November 28, 2007, 09:09:23 AM »
Tom Bishop - you only seem to have addressed a few of the points raised. Are you a politician?
5
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Radar Waves
« on: November 28, 2007, 07:59:36 AM »Wow, that is an amazing argument.I'm sorry but what was your argument based on, pull that one out of your arse did you?
6
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Radar Waves
« on: November 28, 2007, 06:10:54 AM »Yes.The return from the ground messes with the operators and aircraft can't be picked out of this clutter very easily.The return from the ocean?...
absoultely spectacularly wrong
7
Flat Earth Debate / Re: plate tectonics
« on: November 28, 2007, 03:34:58 AM »Lambie, no matter what you say or do, you are still wrong. That is how this forum works
So there is no point in the discussion area of the website then.
8
Flat Earth Debate / Re: plate tectonics
« on: November 28, 2007, 02:13:49 AM »You're back. Have you just been reading up on plate tectonics on wikipedia or somethingUh, I have school and work, unlike you.
Here's the Antarctic Plate [ILLUSTRATION AND APPROXIMATION ONLY]:
Here's how the plates work [ILLUSTRATION AND APPROXIMATION ONLY]:
From you diagram, it looks like your ice wall is getting a bit too warm
So, your "plate" that the ice wall sits on covers the whole of the underside of the earth too?
9
Flat Earth Debate / Re: plate tectonics
« on: November 28, 2007, 02:03:22 AM »Virtually everything that you sayPoint them out.I'm just struggling to see how this plate that's on the edge of the Earth works.The plate is not moving. Can't even comprehend pictures, eh?Which was is it moving?Which moving what?Maybe it's time for Jack to draw one of his good pictures to show me the edge of the Earth and how the plate here operates.Already shown in the picture. It's your responsibility to fully comprehend its meaning, which I guess you couldn't...I bet he doesn't post it, because it won't be possible to draw.Won't be possible to draw what?
I can't comprehend your picture because it's utter dross. End of. Go back to school.
11
Flat Earth Debate / Re: plate tectonics
« on: November 27, 2007, 05:53:04 AM »
I'm just struggling to see how this plate that's on the edge of the Earth works. Which was is it moving? Maybe it's time for Jack to draw one of his good pictures to show me the edge of the Earth and how the plate here operates. I bet he doesn't post it, because it won't be possible to draw.
12
Flat Earth Debate / Re: plate tectonics
« on: November 27, 2007, 05:41:33 AM »but the ice wall sits on a plate right?Is the continent of Antarctica connected to the same plate that the ice wall sits on?
Depends on where the Ice Wall is actually located. Given that the Ice Wall hasn't been seen etc... I would guess that no, it isn't on the same plate.
13
Flat Earth Debate / Re: plate tectonics
« on: November 27, 2007, 05:40:50 AM »Virtually everything that you sayWell, what don't you agree?You can't have moving plates on a flat surface with boundaries.Why?Good, we finally reach an agreement.
What have we agreed?
14
Flat Earth Debate / Re: plate tectonics
« on: November 27, 2007, 04:45:26 AM »Well, there obviously has to be an edge if it's finite. I can't remember if Username subscribes to the infinite Earth idea.Well instead of worrying about that, answer me this. Is the continent of Antarctica connected to the same plate that the ice wall sits on?
15
Flat Earth Debate / Re: plate tectonics
« on: November 27, 2007, 04:29:03 AM »finite without an edge then?Or haven't you all agreed on that yet?
Is that required? Ugh, I can't stand this shit.
Anyways, Tom has tried to say that it's infinite (and there were discussions about the possibilities this entails), but the general consensus is that it is finite.
16
Flat Earth Debate / Re: plate tectonics
« on: November 27, 2007, 01:39:02 AM »
it has no edge. Please can someone debating on the FE side explain the shape of the earth. Or haven't you all agreed on that yet? 
17
Flat Earth Debate / Re: The FE sun is impossible
« on: November 26, 2007, 03:40:46 PM »
agreed, but catch him off topic and he spouts crap like the best of them and will resort to something about the ice wall.
18
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Moon Landing
« on: November 26, 2007, 09:31:58 AM »I'm getting the hang of this site now..........post random stuff to diffuse the debate, send it off at a tangent...except, of course, that the earth is in fact flat.yeah that's right. Evidence that the earth is flat is that the earth is...flat
Of course.
ice crystals
21
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: The Coin Theory
« on: November 26, 2007, 09:27:17 AM »Considering that one of them is Tom Bishop, no.and the rest?
22
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Moon Landing
« on: November 26, 2007, 09:16:46 AM »except, of course, that the earth is in fact flat.yeah that's right. Evidence that the earth is flat is that the earth is...flat
23
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: The Coin Theory
« on: November 26, 2007, 09:06:07 AM »You would think that if 6 billion people believe in RE they would agree on the same things...You would think that the 10 people who believe in FE would agree on the same things too.
24
Flat Earth Debate / Re: plate tectonics
« on: November 26, 2007, 07:58:25 AM »The flat earth has no boundries.I don't see the ice wall next to any hot stuff...OH, I see. The ice wall is part of a plate. The one which doesn't seem to move, has always been where it is. Plate tectonics and FE don't mix. You can't have moving plates on a flat surface with boundaries.
It does in the sense of plate tectonics, that's what this thread is about. What is the edge of the flat earth made of? The Ice Wall? A continental plate? Something else?
25
Flat Earth Debate / Re: plate tectonics
« on: November 26, 2007, 07:48:02 AM »
please could someone debating on the FE side of things draw a map of the earth 100m years ago, just to roughly show where the plates were.
26
Flat Earth Debate / Re: plate tectonics
« on: November 26, 2007, 03:13:32 AM »You can't have moving plates on a flat surface with boundaries.Why?Good, we finally reach an agreement.
What have we agreed?
28
Flat Earth Debate / Re: plate tectonics
« on: November 25, 2007, 09:27:40 AM »I don't see the ice wall next to any hot stuff...OH, I see. The ice wall is part of a plate. The one which doesn't seem to move, has always been where it is. Plate tectonics and FE don't mix. You can't have moving plates on a flat surface with boundaries.
29
Flat Earth Debate / Re: plate tectonics
« on: November 25, 2007, 09:17:42 AM »
it's just a little unclear what the ice wall is connected to on the diagram. Looks like ice next to hot stuff = melty ice wall = no stupid FE
30
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Slow Clocks
« on: November 25, 2007, 08:57:29 AM »
they certainly wouldn't let quite a few of the people on this website on to a plane.