1
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Atmosphere
« on: December 12, 2007, 11:24:29 AM »
Um from your post it does....
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Gravitational Pull
« on: November 20, 2007, 07:05:59 PM »he said the flat earth would "approach" lightspeed, i.e. 99.99% of lightspeed, in a year.
this reminds me of something i mentioned in a different thread: 2 atomic clocks were sycronized, then one was loaded onto an airplane and lifted to 30,000 feet. then their times were compared, and the one in the air was running slightly faster, EXACTLY like einstein's relativity said it would!
but FErs don't believe in gravity, they babble about "dark energy" and "universal accelleration" instead!
also, it has been PROVEN that objects WEIGH less at high altitude than at ground level, which contradicts "dark energy".
What?
We are accellerating upwards at 9.8m/s^2
3
Flat Earth Debate / Why do "they" want us to think that the earth is round?
« on: November 20, 2007, 06:53:42 PM »
In the end, why does it even matter if the world is flat or not? And why do "they" (whoever they are) want us to think that the earth is round?
4
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Shadow object, tides, and air travel
« on: November 20, 2007, 06:45:58 PM »Instead of acting like an eight year old, maybe you should actually get around to answering my question.Your question is already answered.
Well I refreshed the page too late.
5
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Shadow object, tides, and air travel
« on: November 20, 2007, 05:40:52 PM »indeed it was, because it successfully allowed me to steer you sufficiently off topic to declare victory:
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=18145.0
ANOTHER WIN FOR FE!!!!!!
Instead of acting like an eight year old, maybe you should actually get around to answering my question.
6
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Shadow object, tides, and air travel
« on: November 20, 2007, 05:36:34 PM »except, of course, for your rebuttal, which was even lamer.
Actually, I didn't think it was lame at all.
7
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Shadow object, tides, and air travel
« on: November 20, 2007, 05:33:03 PM »Well, since they do exist, and the earth is flat, you fail.
Wow, that was the lamest post ever.
8
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Shadow object, tides, and air travel
« on: November 20, 2007, 05:29:21 PM »I have a few questions...
Shadow Object: How come no one has ever seen it, and how come we can't detect it's gravitational pull?
Perhaps it has no gravitational pull.QuoteTides: How come people can't detect it when their whole house suddenly tilts? Even if it is really small, I'm sure people could still detect it.
The Earth does not tilt. The moon and antimoon account for tides.QuoteAir travel: Why does it take less time to travel from the UK to the US if you go up towards the north pole than curve back down?
Jetstreams.
I fail to see how jetstreams can exist on a flat earth, and everything has a gravitational pull.
9
Flat Earth Debate / Shadow object, tides, and air travel
« on: November 20, 2007, 05:24:18 PM »
I have a few questions...
Shadow Object: How come no one has ever seen it, and how come we can't detect it's gravitational pull?
Tides: How come people can't detect it when their whole house suddenly tilts? Even if it is really small, I'm sure people could still detect it.
Air travel: Why does it take less time to travel from the UK to the US if you go up towards the north pole than curve back down?
Shadow Object: How come no one has ever seen it, and how come we can't detect it's gravitational pull?
Tides: How come people can't detect it when their whole house suddenly tilts? Even if it is really small, I'm sure people could still detect it.
Air travel: Why does it take less time to travel from the UK to the US if you go up towards the north pole than curve back down?
Pages: [1]