Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Any real theory can be proved in a few sentences / a paragraph / a few photos. You don't need a BOOK to prove something so BASIC AND SIMPLE.
Ever hear of Martin Heidegger's Being and Time?
...is it a photograph?
Any real theory can be proved in a few sentences / a paragraph / a few photos. You don't need a BOOK to prove something so BASIC AND SIMPLE.
I guess I'm just annoyed at the "My Problem with UA" thread where people are arguing past each other.
All of models I've seen show that Antartica is the Ice Wall. Why not the North Pole?
There's no "reason". It's how the Earth is. We can't change the geography of the Earth.
Says the man who wants to change a 3d ball into a disc...
No, narc wins. I thought you were getting it, too...
narc. Always. Wins.
Indeed they would, in which case, narc would win again. (if you haven't noticed yet, narc can't lose)
So, in other words, narc wins. Got ye'.
Why did you nominate the retarded cousin? I understand equal rights but that is going too far.Because people like you can easily relate to his retardedness.
Multiverse traditionally means the collection of universes across dimensions and such. Something like the, now disproven, Hawking paradox and information loss in black holes to alternate universes.Hawking Paradox disproven? Are you refering to Hawking Radiation? If so what is the new theory?
If there was a God, Elvis would be alive and all the imposters would be dead.
Point a laser out the side of the boat. You'd have a check on the angle of light that way.
You'd need g to be a helluva lot bigger to see light emitted at 45 degrees. Your view would be really weird. I'm guessing it'd look like you were standing on top of a massive Redshifted hyperbola.
lol. With you now. *slaps himself*
Socrates' result still stands, however.
.
No. The boat, the ocean, and the observer are all moving at the same speed. The argument is that while the light is "in flight" that the ocean accelerates blocking the light's travel. The RE Primer works the math for a similar case, that of the setting Sun, in detail. In the 3,000 mile distance in that case, the FE could not have moved more than one inch.I tried to figure out how far away the boat had to be to lose 1m of it's image.
But if everything in the universe is accelerating, then there is no force pulling you back, you are moving with the universe at 9.81m/s2, and when you jump you will be moving at 9.81m/s2+the force of your jump, I don't see how you somehow forfeit the force of the universal accelerator when you jump, and your jump becomes just the force of your jump.
Run-on sentence.
But is all the stuff accelerating? Is the sun accelerating? The Moon? The stars? Or just the earth? Also acceleration is known as a vector quantity, so it has a magnitude (9.81m/s2) and a direction. Where is it acclerating? Please be specific.Yes, all the stuff we can see, is accelerating. And it's all accelerating in a direction normal to the planar surface of the Earth.
A mechanism for a universal accelerator has yet to be revealed by any flat earther.How about a mechanism for 'gravity'? I've been asking RE'ers for one, yet, no takers.
The earth accelerates upwards.
The light travels at a constant velocity.
This means the longer the light travels parallel to the earths surface, the closer the earth will come to it, until, eventually, it blocks the light. This phenomena starts with the light closest to the earths surface, or the light that reflected off the lowest parts of the hull.
The further the ship is from the observer, the more of the ship, starting from the bottom and working up, will disappear from view.
The universe itself is not accelerating, just the stuff in it. I fail to see how that would keep stuff from 'falling' back to earth.
Tom has given a model for the UA that even round-earthers have yielded as a potential working model.
