1
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: stupid douches
« on: June 21, 2007, 12:29:28 PM »
no i'm not comin back and i'm a FUCKING BOY PWNED FAG
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1] 2
2
Flat Earth Q&A / stupid douches
« on: June 21, 2007, 12:21:51 PM »
i'm out you fucking fags this is the dumbest fucking place ever.
FUCK MY BALLS
FUCK MY BALLS
3
Flat Earth Q&A / Stratellites
« on: June 21, 2007, 12:13:49 PM »
Ok if "stratellites" are balloons wouldn't we have seen them by now? They're balloons most likely like a hot-air balloon if it isn't a hot-air balloon then it then it's a regular balloon but that regular balloon would've been broken by now because we have jets and planes that tear through the sky and would've easily popped the small balloon and the reason why hot-air balloons won't work is because those things would have to be out in the sky and never come back down. Also today is a clear sky and that means I should see one, do I? No.
4
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Ross's 60,000 mile ice wall
« on: June 21, 2007, 11:34:41 AM »
really give me a hard equation and i can fix it
5
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Ross's 60,000 mile ice wall
« on: June 21, 2007, 11:30:31 AM »
in what way do i need to prove it? tell me a way and i'm sure i can do it.....unnnless it's like algebra equations.
6
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Ross's 60,000 mile ice wall
« on: June 21, 2007, 11:23:06 AM »
lol because youdon't know me
7
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Ross's 60,000 mile ice wall
« on: June 21, 2007, 11:18:37 AM »
and that's where you're wrong. because really i'm not this completely stupid irl. anyways i come here to laugh my head off not to debate things 
anyways i'm really smart at school and not a complete douche
anyways i'm really smart at school and not a complete douche
8
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: RE-winning threads
« on: June 21, 2007, 11:14:08 AM »
this was a long time ago 
10
Flat Earth Q&A / :D :D :D
« on: June 21, 2007, 10:46:53 AM » I'm boredCan't Touch Me!
Can't Touch Me!
Ju Ju Ju Ju Ju Just like the bad guys from lethal weapon 2
I got diplomatic emmunity
So hammer you can't sue
I can write graphatti
Even J-walk in the street
I can right-a-loop
And touch your sisters teet!
Can't Touch Me!
Can't Touch Me!
What in gosh name is he doing?
Can't Touch Me!
I Believe that's the worm!
Can't touch me!
Stop! Peter Time!
Mr. Ireland's a complete idiot!
There's no doubt
I can light Mr. Ireland than pee him out.
Don't like? Kiss my rump. Just for a minute lets all do the bump!
Can't Touch Me!
Ya do the Peter Gryphon Bump!
Can't Touch Me!
I'm Presidential Peter.
Mr. Ireland is a fag!
Don't Care if your handicap!
I'll still park in your spot!
I've been around the world!
From Harvert to Back Bay!
It's Peter!Go Peter! I'm So Peter! Yo Peter!
Let's see Regis rap this way! Can't touch me!
Except for you. You can touch me.
11
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Ross's 60,000 mile ice wall
« on: June 21, 2007, 10:38:18 AM »lol that's why i come here to listen argue and to well laugh my head off...it's all proof that whoever believes it are complete boneheads.....and i really don't care what you say because it's...well i just don't care
Stop now, your cowardness has already risen to new heights.
12
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Ross's 60,000 mile ice wall
« on: June 21, 2007, 10:32:54 AM »
lol that's why i come here to listen argue and to well laugh my head off...it's all proof that whoever believes it are complete boneheads.....and i really don't care what you say because it's...well i just don't care
13
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Ross's 60,000 mile ice wall
« on: June 21, 2007, 10:25:55 AM »
LOL look at this completely distorted map.
It's a map of an RE made flat and completly distorted.
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=12758.msg184985#msg184985
It's a map of an RE made flat and completly distorted.
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=12758.msg184985#msg184985
14
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Ross's 60,000 mile ice wall
« on: June 21, 2007, 10:23:52 AM »
You know I don't see why I bother...It's all a conspiracy to believe in it beng flat just like believing that the government...................WAIT LEMME GUESS HAHA. YOU ALL BELIEVE IN 9/11 CONSPIRACIES RIGHT HAHA!
15
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Ross's 60,000 mile ice wall
« on: June 21, 2007, 10:11:22 AM »Ya but i'm talking about of an RE map you west. FE maps you can't do that ou have to go east which take MUCH longer than going east on an RE map. It only takes 14 hours. A whole lot quicker than on a FE map.
No, going west is completely possible. And the times for something to traval in the southern hemi on a FE is much long than on a RE. I don't think there is an explanation for the shorter-flight-times-than-they-should-be on a FE in reality.
How is going west possible. Please tell me. You would go of the world if you went west of an FE map.
16
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Ross's 60,000 mile ice wall
« on: June 21, 2007, 09:13:58 AM »Yes they are on a good jetplane it takes about 14hours but. Think on an FE it's too long for that because if you start in California and go to Japan on FE you would see land and people would've reported it by now. But the haven't. The reason why is that you're supposed to see nothing but water except for small islands. And on FE that's what it does.
I don't think so, not if you're following west. Are we talking about the same FE map, here?
Ya but i'm talking about of an RE map you west. FE maps you can't do that ou have to go east which take MUCH longer than going east on an RE map. It only takes 14 hours. A whole lot quicker than on a FE map.
17
Flat Earth Q&A / Weather anyone?
« on: June 21, 2007, 08:55:35 AM »
Ok if our "FE" is moving up however much what happens to clouds? Do they just go to the edge and disappear? And how do they keep aloft? With the FE moving and there's no gravity whatsoever then ho does the clouds stay up there?
18
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Ross's 60,000 mile ice wall
« on: June 21, 2007, 08:48:06 AM »Japan is on the whole other part of the world, and so is Korea.For one we couldn't fly from California to Japan going West. Two is that Korea has made missiles and can fire them into the nothingness of the Pacific Ocean. But they can still hit California if fired right. How is that if they're thousands of milses away?
Circumnavigation of the known (the known in there just for you Gulliver) part of the earth is completely possible. Uhhm, aren't they thousands of miles away on a RE too? I'm not too good with geography...
Yes they are on a good jetplane it takes about 14hours but. Think on an FE it's too long for that because if you start in California and go to Japan on FE you would see land and people would've reported it by now. But the haven't. The reason why is that you're supposed to see nothing but water except for small islands. And on FE that's what it does.
19
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Ross's 60,000 mile ice wall
« on: June 21, 2007, 08:26:59 AM »The circumference of the FE icewall is officially unkown, because that quote days the distance he travaled, and nothing more.
Japan is on the whole other part of the world, and so is Korea.For one we couldn't fly from California to Japan going West. Two is that Korea has made missiles and can fire them into the nothingness of the Pacific Ocean. But they can still hit California if fired right. How is that if they're thousands of milses away?
20
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Ross's 60,000 mile ice wall
« on: June 20, 2007, 09:26:32 PM »
lol where is everyone >.<
21
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Ross's 60,000 mile ice wall
« on: June 20, 2007, 08:58:01 PM »From page 348 of his final volume:"At noon we were in Lat 49° 20' S. and Long 37° 24' E. A light breeze originated from the north-west. Having been done with our mission we made all sail for the Cape of Goodhope."
...
"In the final narrative of our four year voyage of the Antarctic seas, I must only further observe, that, amongst the many events which has occurred to call fourth our gratitude to God for his guidance during the arduous and hazardous operations in which we have been engaged over the last 62,400 miles. It was most unfortunate that we had lost several of our crew members to sickness and drowning. Their memories will live on in our hearts and minds, as a bastion to the relentless aspirations of man and his never ending avidity for the exploration of new frontiers."
Haha. That doesn't even explain anything do to the opinion that FE is true. It just means he's traveled 62,400 miles over the past 4 years. Not ever in that qoute does it state around the whole ring. Nor can you infer that he did.
22
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Question
« on: June 20, 2007, 08:02:42 PM »Well, looks like the topics been covered...
What topic's covered?
23
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Question
« on: June 20, 2007, 08:54:13 AM »
I don't have a point annd i'm not an FE'er i'm just saying i understand what your saying.
25
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Question
« on: June 20, 2007, 08:25:55 AM »
Ok Septical I understand that too. A few months back FE'rs myight remeber me as a stupid kid but now i'm pretty smart. I know what i'm talking about and i guess we don't know but if we don't then i understand that you all don't know. But if you think laws of motion apply where something continues to move unless an oppisite force pushes on it. So the only way is that if the whole entire ice wall is making a convergent boundaries against all plates then i would see why it doesn't leak.
26
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: FE tides
« on: June 20, 2007, 08:19:51 AM »And this is the real Engy? Boom goes his credibility I guess. I mean obviously gravity is a cause of some acceleration, but so is me throwing a ball.I get your point Skeptical. Like when your driving in your car(could be anything). Me acellerating in a car isn't gravity or gravitation. Also when humans move that's the best phase of acceleration cuz we acclerate to a lot of speeds. Also that work of motion is my muscles and acceleration not gravity or gravitation.
Imagine that you're (not your!) in a car with blackened windows and you can’t even hear the sound of the engine. Now, imagine that the car is undergoing a constant acceleration of 5.7 m/s2 (which would mean that the car accelerates from 0 to 60 mph in 4.7 seconds). For all you know it, this would be as if you’re moving with constant speed down an inclined plane with an angle to the horizontal equal to:
Arctan (5.7/9.8 ) = 30°
, but that the acceleration of free fall is: √(5.72+9.82) = 11.3 m/s2. How can you prove that the above described situation is not the real deal?
Ok Bushido. Now I understand what you say. I go with your point. But you have to have an inclined plane for that. What if it's a completely straight road would you move? No. You would have to have a motor or something to push it because gravity wouldn't be able to take place.
No, no, no. You're accelerating on a straight road, but it looks the same as if you were on driving with a constant speed down an inclined plane.
EDIT:
Correction. Not down, but up the inclination!
Annd that's where you lost me. Sorry.
27
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Pics Are Always Fake
« on: June 20, 2007, 08:17:18 AM »It very well could be... I've always been suspicious that government technology is actually far more advanced than what we realize, so why not?
Ok, if you didn't know they can do that. I know that because I've heard that they can do it on the news. It's called a decompressor. It's what space is like. with gravity we have a compressing force called gravity. With a decompressor you can make it to where astronuats getting ready to go into space can experience it before hand. But that doesn't mean that they're going to do that. Also the reason why it's so grainy is that it's in space. There's almost no light in space.
28
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: FE tides
« on: June 20, 2007, 08:10:20 AM »And this is the real Engy? Boom goes his credibility I guess. I mean obviously gravity is a cause of some acceleration, but so is me throwing a ball.I get your point Skeptical. Like when your driving in your car(could be anything). Me acellerating in a car isn't gravity or gravitation. Also when humans move that's the best phase of acceleration cuz we acclerate to a lot of speeds. Also that work of motion is my muscles and acceleration not gravity or gravitation.
Imagine that you're (not your!) in a car with blackened windows and you can’t even hear the sound of the engine. Now, imagine that the car is undergoing a constant acceleration of 5.7 m/s2 (which would mean that the car accelerates from 0 to 60 mph in 4.7 seconds). For all you know it, this would be as if you’re moving with constant speed down an inclined plane with an angle to the horizontal equal to:
Arctan (5.7/9.8 ) = 30°
, but that the acceleration of free fall is: √(5.72+9.82) = 11.3 m/s2. How can you prove that the above described situation is not the real deal?
Ok Bushido. Now I understand what you say. I go with your point. But you have to have an inclined plane for that. What if it's a completely straight road would you move? No. You would have to have a motor or something to push it because gravity wouldn't be able to take place.
29
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Question
« on: June 20, 2007, 08:06:49 AM »Well if it has been held up tell me how it has. If you all know about FE then actually tell me the answers to my questions. Because there isn't anything blocking it. Physics happens and there has been earthqueaks close to the end of the earth and without a doubt hit it. Also just think in the prehistoric age. Think. The land masses were ONE big mass they split up. That splitting would've caused the ends of the earth to push out and split thus leaving no water.But when we have earthquakes wouldn't it hit the end of the Earth? The wohle earth is made of plates. Soo those ice-walls would've already came down. Also water would be leaving us. The plates move everyday. May be bareley a milimeter but they move everyday. So if that happens Somwhere along the icewall it will be interrupted and will be broken thus creating holes for water to leak out.
Well, they obviously haven't come down yet, so there must be something holding them up.
30
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Question
« on: June 20, 2007, 07:58:42 AM »Yes, the ice wall surrounds the earth, otherwise, all the water would leave us. That triangle is a regular area, of what I know it's just a myth that an excessive amount of things go down or get lost there.But when we have earthquakes wouldn't it hit the end of the Earth? The wohle earth is made of plates. Soo those ice-walls would've already came down. Also water would be leaving us. The plates move everyday. May be bareley a milimeter but they move everyday. So if that happens Somwhere along the icewall it will be interrupted and will be broken thus creating holes for water to leak out.
Pages: [1] 2