Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Dan Man

Pages: [1]
1
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Scared?
« on: April 06, 2007, 12:43:23 PM »
You realize there is a difference between Dark Matter and Dark Energy, right?

So...how about those other things we were discussing?

Yes, Dark Energy does something, Dark Matter is just there.

How about answering all my replies, such as why don't YOU warp a picture and show us the 'actual' flat earth.

Come on, if every worker for every goverment and every space society in the world were hidding something, you really don't think it would get leaked?

2
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Scared?
« on: April 06, 2007, 10:01:27 AM »
You mean Dark Energy, right?  Maybe it would accelerate the rocket, once it was sufficiently far from the earth.  But you still have to get there and back.  That would require a lot of mass.
No, dark matter, non existing matterial that is obviously there since the universe does not end at earth. Unless the universe is flat (deedeedee)

3
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Scared?
« on: April 05, 2007, 05:33:59 PM »
If the earth is excelerating, then must be its surroundings or the force of the air would kill us instantaniously. Thus is the air above us, thus is what is above that, dark matter, thus also propelling the spaceship.

4
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Scared?
« on: April 05, 2007, 05:30:17 PM »
Lets have you answer all my responses rather than just simply deny all my logic and give me a reason why.

5
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Scared?
« on: April 05, 2007, 04:59:48 PM »
I see. Then what is a few billion to them? What will they do with it? Why do you base the entire theory on things you make up on things to modernize today to what was written in 1881?

I never said that, did I? Read what you're responding to.

If they have the capabilities, which they obviously do, why don't they use it? Why leave us in the dark with their equipment if they can't use it because of us?

Then you are a lifeless nerd who is making irrelevant comparisons. Why did you watch startrec if it had spherical planets? Hippocracy at best

Then how do you counter that spaceflight is just the sustained movement of a spacecraft into and through outer space. Spaceflights primarily use rocket technology for propulsion. A spaceflight begins with a launch, which provides the initial thrust to overcome the force of gravity and propel the spacecraft from the surface of the Earth. Once in space, the motion of a spacecraft -- both when unpropelled and when under propulsion -- is determined by astrodynamics. The realistic proposal of space travel goes back to Konstantin Tsiolkovsky. His most famous work, The Exploration of Cosmic Space by Means of Reaction Devices, was published in 1903, but this theoretical work was not widely influential outside of Russia.

Spaceflight became an engineering possibility with the work of Robert H. Goddard's publication in 1919 of his paper 'A Method of Reaching Extreme Altitudes'; where his application of the de Laval nozzle to liquid fuel rockets gave sufficient power that interplanetary travel became possible. This paper was highly influential on Hermann Oberth and Wernher Von Braun, later key players in spaceflight.

The first rocket to reach space was a prototype of the German V-2, on a test flight in 1942. In 1957 the Soviet Union launched Sputnik 1, which became the first artificial satellite to orbit the Earth. The first human spaceflight was Vostok 1 on April 12, 1961, aboard which Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin made one orbit around the Earth.

Rockets remain the only currently practical means of reaching space. Other technologies such as scramjets still fall far short of orbital speed, although show some potential.

A launch pad is a fixed structure designed to dispatch airborne vehicles.

It generally consists of a launch tower and flame trench. It surrounded by equipment used to erect, fuel, and maintain launch vehicles.

A spaceport, by way of contrast, is designed to facilitate winged launch vehicles and uses a long runway.[citation needed]

Both spaceport and launch pads are situated well away from human habitation for noise and safety reasons.

Rockets run though a countdown sequence prior to Rocket launch.

A launch is often restricted to certain launch windows. These windows depend upon the position of celestial bodies and orbits relative to the launch site. The biggest influence is often the rotation of the Earth itself. Once launched, orbits are normally located within relatively constant flat planes at a fixed angle to the axis of the Earth, and the Earth rotates within this orbit.



Furthermore, remember the ship returning to space, burned up in the atmosphere and stuff landed everywhere, not to mention video footage of it falling from space.

THEN DO IT! Prove to me you can do it by doing it. Right now.

6
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Scared?
« on: April 05, 2007, 04:35:37 PM »
You say that they do it for tens of billions (while the goverments have tens of trillions) when you can't say how it makes them money.

1) Despite what you think historically (it's written down, so it's true!) the goverments would be in nuclear lazer alien warfare right now blowing their brains out if we were in the sone age relativley.

2) Yes, but to create a "fictional" picture of earth such as this would not work in the 1600s, much less 1969 no?

If they wanted to keep us in the dark, why create the illusion at all? Why would they purpously make this shit up if it would be best if it were stayed an illogical meaning to go into space.

Then make a picture such as the one above, but only the actual 'flat' earth. Do it. Now. Do it. Come on. Oh wait? What's that?

No beaners belive in flat earthism, only crackheads like yourself.

Yes, I still belive you are just doing this for your own entertainment.

7
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Scared?
« on: April 05, 2007, 04:23:51 PM »
Furthermore, you say that the picture of space are crappy photoshops. THEY DIDN'T HAVE PHOTOSHOP IN 1969

8
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Scared?
« on: April 05, 2007, 04:22:12 PM »
I see. So basically "I don't know and don't want to acess the hole in our stupid little ideas" ?

9
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Sick and tired of the non-believers!
« on: April 05, 2007, 04:14:38 PM »
I belive you would be fired if you were actually a teacher rather than a 9 year old. Teaching against legal curriculum; ktnxbai

10
Flat Earth Q&A / Scared?
« on: April 05, 2007, 04:11:30 PM »
Why delete my topic regarding what is the motive for the conspiracy? Why is it marketable? What is your point? Are you scared? Are YOU the conspiracy?

11
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Round Earthism is bullshit and here's why
« on: April 05, 2007, 04:05:06 PM »
Erm no, all things retain heat built up in the day, and if you don't accept the Earth falls into darkness explain night-time.

I have no belief of this at all whatsoever but HYPOTHETICALLY if it were, he would still be right.

12
How did the planet come out flat IF it was all created from condensed matter at a very early stage of the universe? If you don't belive in the 'big bang,' then what do you explain for the existence of all the other planets? Futhermore, what are the other planets orbiting if the sun orbids the earth?

Pages: [1]