Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - BosnianVet1954

Pages: [1]
1
Hay is for horses. ANd J Kasich is my personal hero. My thread has more views that this one. I am the better flatearthener.   8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-*

2
Flat Earth Debate / Re: I'd like to present a few proofs...
« on: November 02, 2015, 03:49:57 PM »
I am a busy man, "I have no time for such nonsense"  If you tell me who said that I will give you a shout out on my Kansas public radio station  kbkk thewind

3
Flat Earth Debate / Re: I'd like to present a few proofs...
« on: November 02, 2015, 03:32:33 PM »
You expect the good hard working Americans of this forum to believe a couple of pictures a 12 year old could have drawn?  It seems to me that you are misguided. Here is my personal website, a wonderful resource for anyone seeking the truth in the face of the crock of lies NASA tries to stuff down your throat. http://libertyjfreedom.wix.com/theearthisflat

4
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

I have been looking for the proof all along. I finally discovered Oboma flying his true colors

5
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Magnetism (?)
« on: April 30, 2015, 07:12:14 PM »
The way I see it is this. The earth is a flat disc on an infinte plane that forms the base or floor of the universe. Above the earth the galexy and the univeres rotate on an axis formed between the north pole and the north star Polaras. Between the north pole and the north start a magnetic field is formed. The north star is magnetic. The north pole is actually the magnetic south pole(even the REer's believe this) and the north start is magnetic north. compasses on earth are pulled into this magentic field. The REer's "south pole" does not exist at all becaue there is no certain location on the ice ring that surround the earth for the south pole and if there were a magentic south pole in antarcitca in a flat earth, everything woulf be turned on its head.

6
The Lounge / Re: New believer
« on: April 27, 2015, 05:47:24 PM »
WHat? are you saying people who believe the earth is flat are dumb, commie! I have given you some solid proof here and you just ignore it.

7
The Lounge / Re: New believer
« on: April 27, 2015, 05:10:39 PM »
Hay all. Things fall because the infinete flat plane earth is constantly accelerating upwards at 9.8m/s, thus creating gravity and a force pushing down against earth and the plan. This is much more straight forward than the strange sphere earth gravity explaination that no one really understands. It was made by the nasa and meant to be confusing so we couldn't crack it. Amen (This was Priest Burl, I was using Bosnianvets account because I couldn;t find my computer and he left his account open at the radio station when I came in for my shift.

8
The Lounge / Re: New believer
« on: April 27, 2015, 10:47:15 AM »

9
The Lounge / Re: New believer
« on: April 27, 2015, 10:45:24 AM »
Hey and welcome here is some proof.

 Let us assume that the question is: Is the earth flat? Now, lets take this a step further, let us question the answer to this question. I common and accepted answer to this question is “no, of course not,” while we would be quick to label those who challenge this statement as “radicals.” This present dynamic that has festered for so long in our country and so many others is the work of mainstream science and its mouthpiece, the liberal media. All your life, you have been inundated with “facts” and statements proclaiming the “irrefutable” theory that the earth is a sphere and you have become completely desensitized. Because of this, you simply take for granted that the earth is round, even without examining the real facts and realities of this question. If I were to ask is the earth round and why is this true, you would most likely respond with the affirmative and tout some well known “proofs.” If this is true, you are wrong. If I denied your claim, I would naturally be obliged to explain myself and this is exactly what I intend to do.
Firstly, let me give you a short geography lesson. Our flat earth is a disc rotating horizontally with its center at the north pole. Around the north pole, the continents are laid out on a flat, circular plane. This organization makes it possible to circumnavigate the globe and by traveling in what we believe to be an easterly or westerly direction. However, in order to circumnavigate the earth, a ship must travel in an arc around the north pole. We believe we are moving in a straight line and are convinced of this by the compass, a tool that we operate under the false suspicion that the earth is a sphere. Yet in reality this is not the case, as one moves say east, the angle between them and central north pole shifts and the needle will move. This movement of the needle it taken to mean that the traveler is straying from a straight path but this is not the case, to compensate for this movement of the needle, the traveler will adjust their course so they are once again moving in an easterly direction. Repeating this process as a ship travels around the earth results in the ship moving in an arc around the north pole, allowing it to circumnavigate the earth in what is believed to be a straight line.
Additionally, our disc shaped earth is surrounded by a wall of ice the you may know as Antarctica. The common misconception is that Antarctica is on the bottom of the “globe” and the home of the south pole while in reality Antarctica runs along the circumference of the earth, acting as a sort of wall. Now you might say that this is false and point to the fact that people have traveled across Antarctica and ended up on the other side of the “globe.” Again let us examine the role of the compass. As the traveler crossed Antarctica they would have had to continue adjusting their course to maintain a southerly direction due to a change in the angle between them and the north pole. As a result, the traveler out walk the along the circumference of the disc and could in fact end up on the other side of the map.
There is also the complexe theory of gravity to recon with. According to sphere earth theorists, the earth turns on its axis and orbits the sun and this creates gravity. However, if the earth were round, gravity would have to be acting in one direction on one side, and another direction on another side, in short, gravity would have to be acting in an infinite number of directions to be pushing down on the surface to the spherical earth. It is simply not possible or one directional orbital movement to create force that acts in an infinite number of directions. On the other hand, in the flat earth model, gravity is created by the earth’s constant upward movement. As the disc earth moves upwards(one direction), a one directional force acts against it, creating gravity.
Also, you may point to the fact that as you gaze out across the ocean, your vision cuts off in an arc, giving the onlooker the allusion that the horizon in an arc and suggesting that the earth is a sphere, however this is nothing more than an allusion. As you look out across the water, there reaches a point where it is so far away you cannot physically see the horizon and you vision cuts off. You cannot expect your vision to cut off in a clean straight line, no of course you can’t, this is simply not how eyes work, just think of your vision as the radius of a circle, you can only see as far as the radius and as you turn your vision, you see a horizon in the shape of an arc. This arc is not the gradual curve of the earth but instead the natural cut off point of your vision.
Now I have presented simple facts in favor of the flat earth theory. These proofs are simple, straight forward and can be understood by just about anyone. This proof does not really on the backing of “common knowledge” nor complex scientific reasoning. On the other hand, the spherical earth theory call for complicated equations and assumptions that are far from intuitive. However, the backbone of the sphere earth theory is that for generations we have lived under this idea and come to take it as an undeniable truth. Yet, this is not truth, it is a lie, a farce and a scam.

10
Flat Earth Debate / Magnetism (?)
« on: April 27, 2015, 08:47:46 AM »
Im writing a book about the Bosnian war from the perspective of a Bosnian immigrent to america and I ran in to some troubel . At one point in the book I talk about my compas (I had a compas in the war ) and I re counted my explanation to a Bosnian boy a bout why compasesses work but know I realize that my explanations about the polls and the center of the earth dont make sense now because of what I now about the flat earth theory. Can any one please explane to me how I can reconcile this dichotomy?

Danke shun,

BOsnianVet

11
Flat Earth Debate / Re: doing away with the conspiracy
« on: April 27, 2015, 08:28:26 AM »
No. The only real conseracy is the mountauins and the Obomas and uthe obomunists arned those people; his commies and socialists and fascists. The Obomas built the mountains to hide their work and there Nasa work in trying to foll and the people and tax them their money. I have never seen a mountain in my life (Kansas is very fkat and I have never left) I have only seen pictures, how do I know they are real, I don;t so I think they are a farse. The pictures are either green screens put up for atheticds of mountaiuns built in th last 40 by the obomas to hide there work. Also. The ocean has not depth, if it did, the earth would not be flat. I have never seen the ocean, have you? I did not think so. The obomas are trying to dig in and hollow the oceans to hide the NAsa I but I and everyone free will stop them. KEEP THE OCEANS FLAT! KEEP THE OCEANS FREE!

12
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Why the Earth Cannot Be Round
« on: April 26, 2015, 07:11:38 PM »
I think I would know whether or not it is satire or not considering I wrote it. Name one thing in the article that you consider to be satirical. If you are just going to dismiss the analysis I put down before you that seems strange considering you can to my forum with a open mind asking for evidence. I present facts, facts the Nasa is afriad will get out and destory the lies the have built up to confuse the AMerican (not American't) public. In fact, it seems as though you might be working for nasa and are trying to bring down my proof by scoffing at it. In fact maybe you are hear to take on the Flat Earth Movement, but we will stand firm and never give in! I am not a left winger, maybe I am a right-winger, i don;t believe in lables (go to http://www.nolabels.org/  i am a member, I have my button, you would show you but i can;t . I am not a commie you are. William Buckley, great man, was also a flat earther and a no mounatiner. godbless

13
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Why the Earth Cannot Be Round
« on: April 26, 2015, 06:40:37 PM »
They say the devil is in the details an you are in there pretty deep. Also, all though this you said are exactly the kind of things a fascist commie would say (i know they are different but the both hate freedom and clearly so do you so all three are equally bad in my book. Again I have laid out solid proof in my article, the very type of proof you have been asking for, and yet you simply accuse me of being a right-winger. How closed minded. 

14
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Why the Earth Cannot Be Round
« on: April 26, 2015, 06:03:58 PM »
By the way Mikeman, why did you change you name to Misero?

15
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Why the Earth Cannot Be Round
« on: April 26, 2015, 06:02:51 PM »
Well I made the website so it is not really just cutting and pasting, a did write the article. If you want proof you can go and see the same article along with others in the "our paper" section of the Liberty gazzette website. I don't think you really read the article because it is laying out the very evidence that you have been asking for and I would be happy to discuss it with you. I am not a right winger, I just love america, kansas, where I live,(kansas) and freedom. You my friend unfortunatly seem to be a wrong-winger. The J stands for justice, I thought that was clear. I guess you just are not a true patriot, if you were you would have seen that, commie.

16
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Why the Earth Cannot Be Round
« on: April 26, 2015, 05:27:53 PM »
Well you can certainly try, and that what a do. If you would like to send a letter to the editor and have it appear in our weekly paper, feel free to put something into the box at the end of the website.

17
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Why the Earth Cannot Be Round
« on: April 26, 2015, 05:20:53 PM »
And here is my website for further information: http://libertyjfreedom.wix.com/theearthisflat
and our sister website: http://libertygazette.wix.com/libertygazette

Hope this is helpful information

18
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Why the Earth Cannot Be Round
« on: April 26, 2015, 05:19:22 PM »
Let us assume that the question is: Is the earth flat? Now, lets take this a step further, let us question the answer to this question. I common and accepted answer to this question is “no, of course not,” while we would be quick to label those who challenge this statement as “radicals.” This present dynamic that has festered for so long in our country and so many others is the work of mainstream science and its mouthpiece, the liberal media. All your life, you have been inundated with “facts” and statements proclaiming the “irrefutable” theory that the earth is a sphere and you have become completely desensitized. Because of this, you simply take for granted that the earth is round, even without examining the real facts and realities of this question. If I were to ask is the earth round and why is this true, you would most likely respond with the affirmative and tout some well known “proofs.” If this is true, you are wrong. If I denied your claim, I would naturally be obliged to explain myself and this is exactly what I intend to do.
Firstly, let me give you a short geography lesson. Our flat earth is a disc rotating horizontally with its center at the north pole. Around the north pole, the continents are laid out on a flat, circular plane. This organization makes it possible to circumnavigate the globe and by traveling in what we believe to be an easterly or westerly direction. However, in order to circumnavigate the earth, a ship must travel in an arc around the north pole. We believe we are moving in a straight line and are convinced of this by the compass, a tool that we operate under the false suspicion that the earth is a sphere. Yet in reality this is not the case, as one moves say east, the angle between them and central north pole shifts and the needle will move. This movement of the needle it taken to mean that the traveler is straying from a straight path but this is not the case, to compensate for this movement of the needle, the traveler will adjust their course so they are once again moving in an easterly direction. Repeating this process as a ship travels around the earth results in the ship moving in an arc around the north pole, allowing it to circumnavigate the earth in what is believed to be a straight line.
Additionally, our disc shaped earth is surrounded by a wall of ice the you may know as Antarctica. The common misconception is that Antarctica is on the bottom of the “globe” and the home of the south pole while in reality Antarctica runs along the circumference of the earth, acting as a sort of wall. Now you might say that this is false and point to the fact that people have traveled across Antarctica and ended up on the other side of the “globe.” Again let us examine the role of the compass. As the traveler crossed Antarctica they would have had to continue adjusting their course to maintain a southerly direction due to a change in the angle between them and the north pole. As a result, the traveler out walk the along the circumference of the disc and could in fact end up on the other side of the map.
There is also the complexe theory of gravity to recon with. According to sphere earth theorists, the earth turns on its axis and orbits the sun and this creates gravity. However, if the earth were round, gravity would have to be acting in one direction on one side, and another direction on another side, in short, gravity would have to be acting in an infinite number of directions to be pushing down on the surface to the spherical earth. It is simply not possible or one directional orbital movement to create force that acts in an infinite number of directions. On the other hand, in the flat earth model, gravity is created by the earth’s constant upward movement. As the disc earth moves upwards(one direction), a one directional force acts against it, creating gravity.
Also, you may point to the fact that as you gaze out across the ocean, your vision cuts off in an arc, giving the onlooker the allusion that the horizon in an arc and suggesting that the earth is a sphere, however this is nothing more than an allusion. As you look out across the water, there reaches a point where it is so far away you cannot physically see the horizon and you vision cuts off. You cannot expect your vision to cut off in a clean straight line, no of course you can’t, this is simply not how eyes work, just think of your vision as the radius of a circle, you can only see as far as the radius and as you turn your vision, you see a horizon in the shape of an arc. This arc is not the gradual curve of the earth but instead the natural cut off point of your vision.
Now I have presented simple facts in favor of the flat earth theory. These proofs are simple, straight forward and can be understood by just about anyone. This proof does not really on the backing of “common knowledge” nor complex scientific reasoning. On the other hand, the spherical earth theory call for complicated equations and assumptions that are far from intuitive. However, the backbone of the sphere earth theory is that for generations we have lived under this idea and come to take it as an undeniable truth. Yet, this is not truth, it is a lie, a farce and a scam.

19
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Why the Earth Cannot Be Round
« on: April 26, 2015, 04:58:47 PM »
Hey Techros. A lot of the people on the forum don't really believe in FE theory they just like to make fun. But actually they are working for the NASA, trying to undermine our work. The space station and program is a  big conspercay run by the OBoma. He hinds his stuff in the mountains tha he builtd to hid it. All mountaisn went up about 40 years ago by my reconing. Some are hollow and hind the Obomas, others are just green screens put up by the government and the socialists. He is a obomuinist mountain being built https://www.google.com/maps/place/Pyramids/@30.0526027,31.5453304,385m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x14583e6c185717df:0xd7bf55bc9d7eeff3

The only real mountains are mount Sinai and mount Rushmore. Stop the lies stop the Obomsa stop the mounatins

20
The Lounge / Re: Hello all! New to the forum
« on: March 17, 2015, 02:39:41 PM »
Hay glad to see you are new to the forum. I am new too, glad to always have new faces around. We have a very interesting discussion going under the "do mountains exist tab in the debate section. I don't know about those guys who say mountains don't exist, they seem like they might be trying to trick us, my wife says maybe the are NASa, I dont know, she is right sometimes. Any way, the mountain people also have a website   libertyjfreedom.wix.com/theearthisflat   but come over and check out the debate but be careful I fear these guys may be up to no good.  ;)

Pages: [1]