The Flat Earth Society

Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth General => Topic started by: MouseWalker on May 24, 2020, 06:55:09 AM

Title: rainbows
Post by: MouseWalker on May 24, 2020, 06:55:09 AM
Sandokhan clames

Light does not split into component colors = variable speed of light = c + v speed provided by the Kassner effect.
How do we have rainbows?
Title: Re: rainbows
Post by: sandokhan on May 24, 2020, 07:15:13 AM
Well done.

(https://physicsworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/PWJan20LT_rainbow_1200.jpg)

Force pours into the heart-shaped depression at the top of the Anu, and issues from the point, and is changed in character by its passage; further, force rushes through every spiral and every spirilla, and the changing shades of colour that flash out from the rapidly revolving and vibrating Anu depend on the several activities of the spirals; sometimes one, sometimes another, is thrown into more energetic action, and with the change of activity from one spiral to another the colour changes.

(http://www.weare1.us/Babbitt%20color.jpg)

(https://alliancesforhumanity.com/matter/matter_files/image008.jpg)

An electric current brought to bear upon the Anu checks their proper motions, i.e., renders them slower; the Anu exposed to it arrange themselves in parallel lines, and in each line the heart-shaped depression receives the flow, which passes out through the apex into the depression of the next, and so on. The Anu always set themselves to the current. Fig. 4. In all the diagrams the heart-shaped body, exaggerated to show the depression caused by the inflow and the point caused by the outflow, is a single Anu.


The rainbow is the totality of the subquark waves made visible.

This is how light/colors are being created.

The Sun (or a ball lightning explosion as in Tunguska) supplies the energy, the subquark (ether) waves are being activated.

Title: Re: rainbows
Post by: JackBlack on May 24, 2020, 02:45:04 PM
The rainbow is the totality of the subquark waves made visible.
Then explain why it appears in specific locations, relative to the observer, rather than as a physical object, and explain how water creates it and it is not always visible.

Your "explanation" seems to make no attempt at all to explain that, nor any attempt to really explain anything and instead is just a collection of meaningless words.