Is this a conspiracy on world level and all the pilots are part of it? They actually know that the earth is not a sphere but they don t tell?Nope.
This is also what general Byrd says. He says there is a continent beyond Lil America, other side of the south pole. it is similar to your opinion and his opinion. I can't say it's true or wrong. I don't think you've gone south enough. if you had gone, your plane would probably have been frozen before the wall - if any - to hit it.
This is also what general Byrd says. He says there is a continent beyond Lil America, other side of the south pole. it is similar to your opinion and his opinion. I can't say it's true or wrong. I don't think you've gone south enough. if you had gone, your plane would probably have been frozen before the wall - if any - to hit it.
No, Admiral does not say, "there is a continent beyond Lil America".
What means "Other side of the south pole" ? He means beyond Antarctica. You have drawn the place is already inside Antarctica, not in the "other side of the south pole". It is still north side of the south pole. With "other side" he means south of the south pole, it only means beyond Antarctica.
You are talking about a time NAZI bases established, but not explored yet. Lol. C:-)What means "Other side of the south pole" ? He means beyond Antarctica. You have drawn the place is already inside Antarctica, not in the "other side of the south pole". It is still north side of the south pole. With "other side" he means south of the south pole, it only means beyond Antarctica.
It means just as it says.
The part in the picture in the admiral's time wasn't explored yet. :)
You are talking about a time NAZI bases established, but not explored yet. Lol. C:-)What means "Other side of the south pole" ? He means beyond Antarctica. You have drawn the place is already inside Antarctica, not in the "other side of the south pole". It is still north side of the south pole. With "other side" he means south of the south pole, it only means beyond Antarctica.
It means just as it says.
The part in the picture in the admiral's time wasn't explored yet. :)
There is nothing about being a pilot that would reveal the shape of the earth to you. A previous moderator, TheEngineer, has testified to this as well as various pilots who have come by over the
Please think of this and tell me.
How long is the distance of the whole parallel of 80 degrees north. A circle of 360 degrees around the parallel 80 N. Ok ... Also what is the length of the 80 degrees South paralel.
Result : if the distances are equal the earth is round .
If 80s is much much bigger than the 80N , the earth is a Pizza .
So? Which one is bigger?
You have drawn the place is already inside Antarctica, not in the "other side of the south pole".No, it is clearly on the other side.
There is nothing about being a pilot that would reveal the shape of the earth to you. A previous moderator, TheEngineer, has testified to this as well as various pilots who have come by over the years.So you think the pilots are too stupid to realise that the distances they fly don't match the globe?
Your conclusion does not seem to follow from your premises. Can you clear up why?If you follow your flat earth map, the distances along the parallels going from the N pole towards the South pole are getting bigger and bigger. For example 60 N with have 10900 NM. The Equator will have 21800 NM. The distance at 60S will be much longer than the one at the Equator. Close to 32700NM. This are solid facts that you can demonstrate by actually flying a certain distance on opposite parallels. This is the easiest way to demonstrate that the earth is flat. Why don t you do that?
There is nothing about being a pilot that would reveal the shape of the earth to you. A previous moderator, TheEngineer, has testified to this as well as various pilots who have come by over the years.
There is nothing about being a pilot that would reveal the shape of the earth to you. A previous moderator, TheEngineer, has testified to this as well as various pilots who have come by over the years.Are you sure? There are few things that a light plane pilot might note and that's all TheEngineer flew.
Basic Perspective (http://theflatearthsociety.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=Basic+Perspective&highlight=eye-level)Samuel Birley Rowbotham also claims the same in, Zetetic Astronomy, at sacred-texts.com, EXPERIMENT 10. (https://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/za15.htm)
A fact of basic perspective is that the line of the horizon is always at eye level with the observer. This will help us understand how viewing distance works, in addition to the sinking ship effect. Have you ever noticed that as you climb
There is nothing about being a pilot that would reveal the shape of the earth to you. A previous moderator, TheEngineer, has testified to this as well as various pilots who have come by over the years.
There is nothing about being a pilot that would reveal the shape of the earth to you. A previous moderator, TheEngineer, has testified to this as well as various pilots who have come by over the years.
If that is intended to dispel the myth that you could fly high enough to see the alleged curve, then that is correct.
There are other things about being a pilot that would provide evidence.
The top of high mountains gradually appearing above the horizon.
This is no different from the much discussed ships' sails but is much more apparent.
The inability of weather radar to give the complete structure of a thunderstorm at a range of more than about 100 miles.
But the short answer to the original question is "no".
It's a very good plan to point the aircraft in the right direction so heading does Qantas QF28's take when flying from Santiago, Chile to Sydney, Australia?There is nothing about being a pilot that would reveal the shape of the earth to you. A previous moderator, TheEngineer, has testified to this as well as various pilots who have come by over the years.
If that is intended to dispel the myth that you could fly high enough to see the alleged curve, then that is correct.
There are other things about being a pilot that would provide evidence.
The top of high mountains gradually appearing above the horizon.
This is no different from the much discussed ships' sails but is much more apparent.
The inability of weather radar to give the complete structure of a thunderstorm at a range of more than about 100 miles.
But the short answer to the original question is "no".
Surely navigation and the shortest distance between any two points is the biggest thing though?
This shows the planned route for one QF28 flight: Quote from: TWcobra Third post in: Short Flights (QF27 & QF28) From Australia to South America (https://www.metabunk.org/flat-earth-theory-debunked-by-short-flights-qf27-qf28-from-australia-to-south-america.t6483/). | Were they flying over a flat Earth the shortest route would be something like this: (https://www.dropbox.com/s/voigk4e3adolw0f/1892%20-%20Gleasons%20Map%20-%20Sydney%20to%20Santiago%20-%2025500%20km%20-%20crop.jpg?dl=1) |