All objects in the earth are under force of gravity, right?Those forces, the person's weight and the buoyancy of the water are both caused by gravity - so no gravity means no weight and no buoyancy.
Think an object, like human, has density about 1t/m^3
Water has 1t/m^3 too.
Imagine a person in water. the water at the top of it and the water under it are equal forces him and create a balance.
So; The total force applied to the person by water is zero.
if the force of gravity was present, the person would move downward in the water. but it is not. Anything that is equal to the weight of the self-weight of the water remains in a fixed position within it, not falling down.
If you have read this writing in 30 seconds so you've saw a disprooof which disproves the gravity in 30 seconds. it's your problem that you haven't gone to a fast reading course.
Imagine a person in water. the water at the top of it and the water under it are equal forces him and create a balance.False. I will assume, for your own good, that you are trolling. You cannot think you are smarter than every scientist in the world when you don't know basic physics known since times of Archimedes.
So; The total force applied to the person by water is zero.
the pressure on the top of the person pushing them down will be less than the pressure at the bottom of the person pushing them up.Exactly.
This means the water will apply an upwards force on the person. So no, the total force applied to the person is an upwards force, not 0.
All objects in the earth are under force of gravity, right?Are you claimng hat humans can't drown? But sure, I can give you that if you give us replacement equation for weight and buoyant force without gravity.
Think an object, like human, has density about 1t/m^3
Water has 1t/m^3 too.
Imagine a person in water. the water at the top of it and the water under it are equal forces him and create a balance.
So; The total force applied to the person by water is zero.
if the force of gravity was present, the person would move downward in the water. but it is not. Anything that is equal to the weight of the self-weight of the water remains in a fixed position within it, not falling down.
If you have read this writing in 30 seconds so you've saw a disprooof which disproves the gravity in 30 seconds. it's your problem that you haven't gone to a fast reading course.
Wise, sandokhan, the erstwhile JRoweSkeptic and sceptomatic do indeed think that they are each "are smarter than every scientist in the world".Imagine a person in water. the water at the top of it and the water under it are equal forces him and create a balance.False. I will assume, for your own good, that you are trolling. You cannot think you are smarter than every scientist in the world when you don't know basic physics known since times of Archimedes.
So; The total force applied to the person by water is zero.
So could be forgiven if wise is around 12 years old.
I wonder if he took part in the designing and building of the Turkish satellite, Göktürk-2 ;)?So could be forgiven if wise is around 12 years old.
No, but he's a Turkish government worker so that explains a lot.
Göktürk-2 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6kt%C3%BCrk-2)
Göktürk-2 is an earth observation satellite (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_observation_satellite) designed and developed by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_and_Technological_Research_Council_of_Turkey) (TÜBİTAK) and built by TÜBİTAK Space Technologies Research Institute (TÜBİTAK UZAY) and Turkish Aerospace Industries (TUSAŞ) for the Turkish Ministry of National Defence.
Göktürk-2 was launched from Jiuquan Launch Area 4 / SLS-2 in China by a Long March 2D space launch vehicle at 16:12:52 UTC on December 18, 2012, one day before the initial schedule due to poor weather conditions in the region. Equipped with state of the art advanced technology developed by Turkey and a series of new enhancements to provide improved high resolution imagery, it was placed at 16:26 UTC into a low Earth orbit of 686 km (426 mi). The first signal from Göktürk-2 was received at 17:39 UTC in the Tromsĝ Satellite Station, northern Norway.
Australia is not real. No idea need lives South of the equator. The moon landing was filmed on a Hollywood set. Obama was a lizard person. Take your pick.René Descartes wrote, "Je pense, donc je suis", "I think so I am".
René Descartes wrote, "Je pense, donc je suis", "I think so I am".
RABinOZ writes, "I think Australia exists so Australia exists" but philosophy was never was my strong point.
As far as I know, Australia exists... or the abilities of man are far underweighted.So we agree once again. It's getting almost a habit, and we can't allow that.
Quote from: John Davis on March 01, 2019, 09:05:21 PM
As far as I know, Australia exists... or the abilities of man are far underweighted.
So we agree once again. It's getting almost a habit, and we can't allow that.But I do not agree, I'm not sure about the whole truth about Australia, since it is forbidden to take any photos and video filming to private individuals. We cannot find one. Who will live in Skype from any city in Australia. Since it is forbidden there.
But I do not agree, I'm not sure about the whole truth about Australia, since it is forbidden to take any photos and video filming to private individuals. We cannot find one. Who will live in Skype from any city in Australia. Since it is forbidden there.You can take photos and film in public, you just can't film in private without consent.
That is total rubbish! Skype is not forbidden in Australia and plenty of people use Skype.QuoteQuote from: John Davis on March 01, 2019, 09:05:21 PM
As far as I know, Australia exists... or the abilities of man are far underweighted.QuoteSo we agree once again. It's getting almost a habit, and we can't allow that.But I do not agree, I'm not sure about the whole truth about Australia, since it is forbidden to take any photos and video filming to private individuals. We cannot find one. Who will live in Skype from any city in Australia. Since it is forbidden there.
I do wish you people would stop posting this stupid ignorant idiotic garbage about Australia!Wow ... thank you so much for the newsletter. But you yourself read that - what is written in these rules? Hope so. I could not find the answer to my question in this pile of useless information.
You can take photos and film in public, you just can't film in private without consent.Sorry, but there is irrefutable evidence that those who did it - paid for it, and all their pictures were withdrawn from the Internet. These were ordinary snapshots of public places. This story is not one.
QuoteYou can take photos and film in public, you just can't film in private without consent.Sorry, but there is irrefutable evidence that those who did it - paid for it, and all their pictures were withdrawn from the Internet. These were ordinary snapshots of public places. This story is not one.
I do not want to argue uselessly with those who troll, not having studied in detail all these points.
I don't troll, I live in Australia and I showed you the Australian laws.QuoteYou can take photos and film in public, you just can't film in private without consent.Sorry, but there is irrefutable evidence that those who did it - paid for it, and all their pictures were withdrawn from the Internet. These were ordinary snapshots of public places. This story is not one.
I do not want to argue uselessly with those who troll, not having studied in detail all these points.
we cannot find someone who would openly be able to contact us via Skype from Australia - right from the center of the city and see live people as they go live there. Why does everyone refuse to do this?Is it because you are ignoring timezone or they just can't be bothered?
As well as the fact that you cant sail along the coast of Australia on your ownThat's not a fact.
\Then how about you provide some of it, because there are plenty of facebook photos and instagram photos and blogs and so on from people in Australia (either living there or visiting) who have posted plenty of photos.
Sorry, but there is irrefutable evidence that those who did it - paid for it
But you still do not understand what I'm talking about.I do understand.
But you still do not understand what I'm talking about.I do understand.
You are baselessly asserting crap about Australia.
All objects in the earth are under force of gravity, right?
Think an object, like human, has density about 1t/m^3
Water has 1t/m^3 too.
Imagine a person in water. the water at the top of it and the water under it are equal forces him and create a balance.
So; The total force applied to the person by water is zero.
if the force of gravity was present, the person would move downward in the water. but it is not. Anything that is equal to the weight of the self-weight of the water remains in a fixed position within it, not falling down.
If you have read this writing in 30 seconds so you've saw a disprooof which disproves the gravity in 30 seconds. it's your problem that you haven't gone to a fast reading course.
All objects in the earth are under force of gravity, right?
Think an object, like human, has density about 1t/m^3
Water has 1t/m^3 too.
Imagine a person in water. the water at the top of it and the water under it are equal forces him and create a balance.
So; The total force applied to the person by water is zero.
if the force of gravity was present, the person would move downward in the water. but it is not. Anything that is equal to the weight of the self-weight of the water remains in a fixed position within it, not falling down.
If you have read this writing in 30 seconds so you've saw a disprooof which disproves the gravity in 30 seconds. it's your problem that you haven't gone to a fast reading course.
What happens if you drop a spanner in a submarine?
HahaAll objects in the earth are under force of gravity, right?
Think an object, like human, has density about 1t/m^3
Water has 1t/m^3 too.
Imagine a person in water. the water at the top of it and the water under it are equal forces him and create a balance.
So; The total force applied to the person by water is zero.
if the force of gravity was present, the person would move downward in the water. but it is not. Anything that is equal to the weight of the self-weight of the water remains in a fixed position within it, not falling down.
If you have read this writing in 30 seconds so you've saw a disprooof which disproves the gravity in 30 seconds. it's your problem that you haven't gone to a fast reading course.
What happens if you drop a spanner in a submarine?
HahaAll objects in the earth are under force of gravity, right?
Think an object, like human, has density about 1t/m^3
Water has 1t/m^3 too.
Imagine a person in water. the water at the top of it and the water under it are equal forces him and create a balance.
So; The total force applied to the person by water is zero.
if the force of gravity was present, the person would move downward in the water. but it is not. Anything that is equal to the weight of the self-weight of the water remains in a fixed position within it, not falling down.
If you have read this writing in 30 seconds so you've saw a disprooof which disproves the gravity in 30 seconds. it's your problem that you haven't gone to a fast reading course.
What happens if you drop a spanner in a submarine?
Wise disproven in 31sec
HahaAll objects in the earth are under force of gravity, right?
Think an object, like human, has density about 1t/m^3
Water has 1t/m^3 too.
Imagine a person in water. the water at the top of it and the water under it are equal forces him and create a balance.
So; The total force applied to the person by water is zero.
if the force of gravity was present, the person would move downward in the water. but it is not. Anything that is equal to the weight of the self-weight of the water remains in a fixed position within it, not falling down.
If you have read this writing in 30 seconds so you've saw a disprooof which disproves the gravity in 30 seconds. it's your problem that you haven't gone to a fast reading course.
What happens if you drop a spanner in a submarine?
Wise disproven in 31sec
Your baselessly claiming me "haha disproven" does not magically disproven me. Where is your proof?
HahaAll objects in the earth are under force of gravity, right?
Think an object, like human, has density about 1t/m^3
Water has 1t/m^3 too.
Imagine a person in water. the water at the top of it and the water under it are equal forces him and create a balance.
So; The total force applied to the person by water is zero.
if the force of gravity was present, the person would move downward in the water. but it is not. Anything that is equal to the weight of the self-weight of the water remains in a fixed position within it, not falling down.
If you have read this writing in 30 seconds so you've saw a disprooof which disproves the gravity in 30 seconds. it's your problem that you haven't gone to a fast reading course.
What happens if you drop a spanner in a submarine?
Wise disproven in 31sec
Your baselessly claiming me "haha disproven" does not magically disproven me. Where is your proof?
You yourself confirmed the existence of those very forces when you started your "explanation".
You said that: "weight of the man is balanced with weight of the displaced water".
Where these weights came from without gravity?
How they can balance themselves if they don't exist?
hehe
Without atmosphere things are a bit heavier.
Styrofoam of 1 m3 has weight of 50 kilograms.
At sea level 1 m3 of air has weight of 1.225 kilograms.
So, 1 m3 of styrofoam submerged in ar will lose 1.225 kg and weigh 48.775 kg.
Read about Archimedes Principle.
Without atmosphere things are a bit heavier.
Styrofoam of 1 m3 has weight of 50 kilograms.
At sea level 1 m3 of air has weight of 1.225 kilograms.
So, 1 m3 of styrofoam submerged in ar will lose 1.225 kg and weigh 48.775 kg.
Read about Archimedes Principle.
At sea level it is heavier because it has more air upside of it. Where is problem here with atmospheric stringency?
Please define "stringceny"
Stringency?Without atmosphere things are a bit heavier.
Styrofoam of 1 m3 has weight of 50 kilograms.
At sea level 1 m3 of air has weight of 1.225 kilograms.
So, 1 m3 of styrofoam submerged in ar will lose 1.225 kg and weigh 48.775 kg.
Read about Archimedes Principle.
At sea level it is heavier because it has more air upside of it. Where is problem here with atmospheric stringency?
Without atmosphere things are a bit heavier.
Styrofoam of 1 m3 has weight of 50 kilograms.
At sea level 1 m3 of air has weight of 1.225 kilograms.
So, 1 m3 of styrofoam submerged in ar will lose 1.225 kg and weigh 48.775 kg.
Read about Archimedes Principle.
At sea level it is heavier because it has more air upside of it. Where is problem here with atmospheric stringency?
Stringency?Without atmosphere things are a bit heavier.
Styrofoam of 1 m3 has weight of 50 kilograms.
At sea level 1 m3 of air has weight of 1.225 kilograms.
So, 1 m3 of styrofoam submerged in ar will lose 1.225 kg and weigh 48.775 kg.
Read about Archimedes Principle.
At sea level it is heavier because it has more air upside of it. Where is problem here with atmospheric stringency?
atmospheric stringency causes a downward force. hehe isn't a magic argument makes your magical gravity dreams to a real power.Easily disproven by so many things it isn't funny.
Wise. Define what you mean by stringency please and stop spamming posts everywhere.
atmospheric stringency causes a downward force. hehe isn't a magic argument makes your magical gravity dreams to a real power.Easily disproven by so many things it isn't funny.
Objects still fall in a vacuum chamber. Things weigh more in a vacuum chamber.
A helium balloon will rise in the atmosphere.
And so on.
This shows it clearly isn't the atmospheric "stringency" (Are you sure that is what you mean? I find three definitions, one is tightness, one is rigorous standards and one is dealing with money) that causes a downwards force.
Instead (the helium balloon especially) shows that there is a downwards force separate from the atmosphere and that the atmosphere actually provides an upwards force (likely due to the pressure differential you claim cannot exist).
Helium baloon is the proof of your so called gravitons are absent.No. Helium and bouyancy in general is a disproof of the air causing things to fall.
<BS deleted>
The only explanation for the buoyant force is the air (or whatever medium the object is in) pushing objects up.Nope. Air pushes everything around like everything does. Which one heavier than stays downside. Simple to get but you are denying the fact because your so called scientists did not teach it you in kindergarden.
Helium baloon goes upward not because of air pushes it to up; simple because it is lighter than the air.It being lighter than air provides no reason for it to go upwards.
What is stringency?
Helium baloon goes upward not because of air pushes it to up; simple because it is lighter than the air.It being lighter than air provides no reason for it to go upwards.
However pressure gradients in mediums (which would push objects upwards) are easily observed and measured.
So no, it goes up because the air pushes it up.
This is further demonstrated by it falling in a vacuum chamber.
All objects push each other. Lets repeat it: All objects push each other.
So you have agreed air pushes helium to upward. It means objects pushes each other.Just because one "object" pushes one other "object" does not mean that "All objects push each other".Okay, please repeat after me.All objects push each other. Lets repeat it: All objects push each other.
What is stringency?
:) Are you asking this with motivation under boydster or with your free will? :)
Simple answer here. If you have any doubt about answer so I can help you get it.
https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+stringency
What is stringency?
:) Are you asking this with motivation under boydster or with your free will? :)
Simple answer here. If you have any doubt about answer so I can help you get it.
https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+stringency
Yes
Tried that.
No relevant answers.
So you have agreed air pushes helium to upward. It means objects pushes each other.Just because one "object" pushes one other "object" does not mean that "All objects push each other".Okay, please repeat after me.All objects push each other. Lets repeat it: All objects push each other.
That would be a Hasty Generalization logical fallacy!
And your so-called "Disproving the gravity in 30 seconds" disproves nothing!
No one is interested in playing a game to figure out exactly how you are butchering the English language today. Please explain what you intend that word to mean in the manner you have used it.What is stringency?
:) Are you asking this with motivation under boydster or with your free will? :)
Simple answer here. If you have any doubt about answer so I can help you get it.
https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+stringency
Yes
Tried that.
No relevant answers.
You have asked the stringency, right? You have tried to learn it and your angry globularist moderator fanatic has forced me to answer you, right? There is an answer there. If you don't know what being stringency, so how you can get whether it is relevant or not? I have told you that ask me which part you don't get I can teach you and you are saying just their not being relevant. You have not that knowledge deciding their being relevant or nor relevant. Just ask which definition you think isn't relevant, and give me the remain part how I see you their being relevant.
Stop to do make word salad again. Object pushes each other. The fact that generalizations are wrong does not mean that generalizations cannot be made. Spesific examples are specity can not change the general laws. All objects push each other, prove me wrong. Your claiming me does not disprove the gravity does not make me magically do not disproved it. Prove I did not do it.Your explanation of gravity cannot be correct because objects still fall in a Vacuum chamber where the cannot be any "air push".
(https://www.dropbox.com/s/wuui1k5zqsbqq4s/Bowling%20ball%20and%20feathers%20falling%20in%20vacuum%20%200.00.jpg?dl=1) At 0 secs | (https://www.dropbox.com/s/84ulvbhvrkun43k/Bowling%20ball%20and%20feathers%20falling%20in%20vacuum%20%200.05.jpg?dl=1) At 5 secs | (https://www.dropbox.com/s/y2wbbthlzq1y04u/Bowling%20ball%20and%20feathers%20falling%20in%20vacuum%20%200.10.jpg?dl=1) At 10 secs |
(https://www.dropbox.com/s/e99we2t2lkebsmr/Bowling%20ball%20and%20feathers%20falling%20in%20vacuum%20%200.15.jpg?dl=1) At 15 secs | (https://www.dropbox.com/s/wb0bijgltiu3hrw/Bowling%20ball%20and%20feathers%20falling%20in%20vacuum%20%200.20.jpg?dl=1) At 20 secs | (https://www.dropbox.com/s/q6zaifkyzr1ya8b/Bowling%20ball%20and%20feathers%20falling%20in%20vacuum%20%200.25.jpg?dl=1) At 25 secs |
<empty content>
Hey Wise, how do you post to the 'Now Playing' thread if you cannot view Youtube?
Lol
I already translated what you posted. You changed your settings. When turkey banned youtube a different message appeared.
What does the message you see translate into English?
Its 12 am in Istanbul.
YOU stop your silly behaviour and please stop lying! YOU claim that "In one hand, your partners in Turkey are preventing me enter many upload web sites" but<empty content>
In one hand, your partners in Turkey are preventing me enter many upload web sites. On the other hand you are asking me some statements by using them. What kind of hypocrisy is this?
(https://i.resimyukle.xyz/ed6M5N.png)Now mister. Stop to shamesly using web pages I can not enter. Either upload them the adress I have uploaded this image above, or call your FETÖ partners in Turkey and tell them to not prevent me enter the web pages. It is easy. Just call cahaya, he does it.
In short, no image, no proof. You have not proved or debunked anything. Upload it this forum, or upload it the adress I gave or there isn't a proof. Stop to behave like Hitler. Your behaviour is a type of fashcism, stop that!
YOU stop your silly behaviour and please stop lying! YOU claim that "In one hand, your partners in Turkey are preventing me enter many upload web sites" but<empty content>
In one hand, your partners in Turkey are preventing me enter many upload web sites. On the other hand you are asking me some statements by using them. What kind of hypocrisy is this?
(https://i.resimyukle.xyz/ed6M5N.png)Now mister. Stop to shamesly using web pages I can not enter. Either upload them the adress I have uploaded this image above, or call your FETÖ partners in Turkey and tell them to not prevent me enter the web pages. It is easy. Just call cahaya, he does it.
In short, no image, no proof. You have not proved or debunked anything. Upload it this forum, or upload it the adress I gave or there isn't a proof. Stop to behave like Hitler. Your behaviour is a type of fashcism, stop that!
I DO NOT HAVE ANY PARTNERS IN TURKEY. Can you read and understand that - now get that massive chip off your shoulder and treat other people decently and you might get along a lot better.
You might find that people were more prepared to follow your wishes if you ceased lying to them and about them!
It is not my fault or the fault of anyone outside Turkey. Blame your government and NOT us thank you.
Now, what site should we upload pictures to?
If you don't know what being stringency, so how you can get whether it is relevant or not?He was stating that the definitions he obtained while searching for it were not relevant to making objects fall (i.e. replacing gravity).
In one hand, your partners in Turkey are preventing me enter many upload web sites.It isn't our partners. It is your government. Stop acting like we are to blame for the actions of your corrupt government.
In short, no image, no proof.You would say the same even with images, just declaring them to be faked or photoshopped.
So how are we supposed to know where to post images for you to see. If I get onto that site I find everything in Turkish so how am I supposed to use it!Now, what site should we upload pictures to?
If you accept, THIS (http://resimyukle.xyz) website. For a while ibb.co was useful but they have prevented me enter it too. I don't write the website name because I think they follow my writings and see it, then block it.
They are your partners because they are fetö, you are nasa, fetö and nasa are partner hence they are your partner.<< Total lies struck out >>
Ladies, Gentlemen, and Et Cetera. This thread is about disproving gravity. Let's keep the government agent accusations where they belong in AR, and the discussion about what image hosting website to use in order to please wise where it belongs in CN.I would love to do just that but:
Ladies, Gentlemen, and Et Cetera. This thread is about disproving gravity. Let's keep the government agent accusations where they belong in AR, and the discussion about what image hosting website to use in order to please wise where it belongs in CN.I would love to do just that but:How does anyone debate or discuss anything under those conditions? And who, apart from Wise is "taking the FE side"?
- How do we learn anything about Wise's explanation of "gravity" or simply "why things fall down".
It's probably buried somewhere in his Quantum Zeta Forward Level Flat Earth Science by FE Prof. Wise (https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=66236.msg1768493#msg1768493)- How do we post any diagrams or videos that Wise can see?
If he can't see them he blames US and comes out with this "call your FETÖ partners in Turkey and tell them to not prevent me enter the web pages".
He comes up this sort of excuse, "Youtube is not banned in entire Turkey nowadays. It is illegally banned in only some computers like mine. when I ask this they say it's not forbidden. but this is a lie. This is because I think fetö/nasa did it.".
Is it harder to upload your BS claims to website I gave its name than discussing whether discussing its required or not required.1) Yes it is because the site I use appears as a folder on my PC, phone or tablet.
Is it harder to upload your BS claims to website I gave its name than discussing whether discussing its required or not required.1) Yes it is because the site I use appears as a folder on my PC, phone or tablet.
2) I can no longer find the <url> of that website but I'll look again.
3) It was all in Turkish and I could translate some but not enough to really know what I was doing.
4) Why should I waste time caring what you think anyway when you call my posts "BS claims"?
I'll give it a go for some but, as I said, my pictures are in a folder on my computer and easy to find, modify and keep track of.Is it harder to upload your BS claims to website I gave its name than discussing whether discussing its required or not required.1) Yes it is because the site I use appears as a folder on my PC, phone or tablet.
2) I can no longer find the <url> of that website but I'll look again.
3) It was all in Turkish and I could translate some but not enough to really know what I was doing.
4) Why should I waste time caring what you think anyway when you call my posts "BS claims"?
4) You should not.
1-2-3) macarios has explained how to use.
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=81502.msg2178124#msg2178124
.. my pictures are in a folder on my computer and easy to find, modify...
Some I created so really were "computer generated" by ME on my computer so are CGI,.. my pictures are in a folder on my computer and easy to find, modify...I knew it. Those pictures are all fakes!!
I'll give it a go for some but, as I said, my pictures are in a folder on my computer and easy to find, modify and keep track of.Is it harder to upload your BS claims to website I gave its name than discussing whether discussing its required or not required.1) Yes it is because the site I use appears as a folder on my PC, phone or tablet.
2) I can no longer find the <url> of that website but I'll look again.
3) It was all in Turkish and I could translate some but not enough to really know what I was doing.
4) Why should I waste time caring what you think anyway when you call my posts "BS claims"?
4) You should not.
1-2-3) macarios has explained how to use.
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=81502.msg2178124#msg2178124
I've made an account and uploaded a couple of photos. Can photos be arranged into folders on that site?I'll give it a go for some but, as I said, my pictures are in a folder on my computer and easy to find, modify and keep track of.I don't recommend you to move them. Just upload that website when required. I think you can do it. If you can not, so call boydsta to do it. He takes your wish as an order.
VPN dude.I already translated what you posted. You changed your settings. When turkey banned youtube a different message appeared.
Youtube is not banned in entire Turkey nowadays. It is illegally banned in only some computers like mine. when I ask this they say it's not forbidden. but this is a lie. This is because I think fetö/nasa did it.
I think it's interesting to read.Not really.
VPN dude.VPN doesn't work.
I've made an account and uploaded a couple of photos. Can photos be arranged into folders on that site?I'll give it a go for some but, as I said, my pictures are in a folder on my computer and easy to find, modify and keep track of.I don't recommend you to move them. Just upload that website when required. I think you can do it. If you can not, so call boydsta to do it. He takes your wish as an order.
It then completely lies about Cavendish. The experiment has been repeated in many different ways and has repeatedly confirmed the existence of gravity.
QuoteIt then completely lies about Cavendish. The experiment has been repeated in many different ways and has repeatedly confirmed the existence of gravity.
ха ха ха... No comments
(http://)
No commentsYes, no comments to the destruction of your link.
Wise, this thread has been open for almost 4 months.
You said you'd disprove gravity in 30 seconds, but we're still waiting.
Wise, this thread has been open for almost 4 months.
You said you'd disprove gravity in 30 seconds, but we're still waiting.
I've proved gravity in 30 seconds for everybody has ordinary logic. If you understand later, so you have delayed in understanding the issue.
Wise, this thread has been open for almost 4 months.
You said you'd disprove gravity in 30 seconds, but we're still waiting.
I've proved gravity in 30 seconds for everybody has ordinary logic. If you understand later, so you have delayed in understanding the issue.
You proved gravity in 30 seconds. This thread can be locked now. OP said gravity is real.
All objects in the earth are under force of gravity, right?
Think an object, like human, has density about 1t/m^3
Water has 1t/m^3 too.
Imagine a person in water. the water at the top of it and the water under it are equal forces him and create a balance.
So; The total force applied to the person by water is zero.
if the force of gravity was present, the person would move downward in the water. but it is not. Anything that is equal to the weight of the self-weight of the water remains in a fixed position within it, not falling down.
<=
If you have read this writing in 30 seconds so you've saw a disprooof which disproves the gravity in 30 seconds. it's your problem that you haven't gone to a fast reading course.
So; The total force applied to the person by water is zero.
So; The total force applied to the person by water is zero.
Not zero. Not only by water.
By water and gravity together.
Learn about Archimedes Principle.
Water displaced by the submerged body counteracts gravity force by own weight.
Why else would rock sink under water, and water sink under wood?
What would pull them there?
So; The total force applied to the person by water is zero.
Not zero. Not only by water.
By water and gravity together.
Learn about Archimedes Principle.
Water displaced by the submerged body counteracts gravity force by own weight.
Why else would rock sink under water, and water sink under wood?
What would pull them there?
Draw it and prove what you said first. I know what Archimet says but saying the name of Archimet does not magically convert your argument to reality.
I've proved gravity in 30 seconds for everybody has ordinary logic.Finally some truth.
I know what Archimet says but saying the name of Archimet does not magically convert your argument to reality.
Dear Sir or Madam,
I have a series of grievances that require addressing:
"All objects in the earth are under force of gravity, right?"
"Think an object, like human, has density about 1t/m^3 water has 1t/m^3 too."
The figures presented above are both approximations, water and people have densities that differ by about 12 kg/m^3, but by using tonnes you lose that accuracy.
"Imagine a person in water. the water at the top of it and the water under it are equal forces him and create a balance."
Humans typically float to the top of water because we are less dense than water, but again, the approximation of densities is what causes this logical fallacy.
"So; The total force applied to the person by water is zero."
The phrase you are looking for is net force, and yes this part in theory is correct in accordance with Newton's third law; however, the correct situation is where the human body is pulled down by gravity, but pushed up by the buoyant force of the water, and since the person is less dense than water, the volume of water they displace is equal to their weight, but less than their total volume. Thus, they float.
"if the force of gravity was present, the person would move downward in the water. but it is not. Anything that is equal to the weight of the self-weight of the water remains in a fixed position within it, not falling down."
Again, this does not work because humans are buoyant; however, if you try the same thing with something like a bowling ball (which is denser than water), then you will notice the effects of gravity as the bowling ball sinks to the bottom.
"If you have read this writing in 30 seconds so you've saw a disprooof which disproves the gravity in 30 seconds. it's your problem that you haven't gone to a fast reading course."
This sentence is just too full of grammatical errors for me to understand.
Thank you for your time.
time
Nah! Try it again.I've disproved gravity in 30 seconds for everybody has ordinary logic.:'( :'( :'( I've talking BS. I have no evidence so I am doing mathematic salad to claim I know many things. :'(
I know what Archimet says but saying the name of Archimet does not magically convert your argument to reality.
I was not talking about the Archimedes himself, I was talking about the principle that has his name.
What pulls stone to go under water, and what pulls water to go under wood?
I know what Archimet says but saying the name of Archimet does not magically convert your argument to reality.
I was not talking about the Archimedes himself, I was talking about the principle that has his name.
What pulls stone to go under water, and what pulls water to go under wood?
Difference of "weight".
Prove the existance of buoyancy force first. It is absent. It is imaginary. It is fake.Your own argument proves it.
I know what Archimet says but saying the name of Archimet does not magically convert your argument to reality.
I was not talking about the Archimedes himself, I was talking about the principle that has his name.
What pulls stone to go under water, and what pulls water to go under wood?
Difference of "weight".
Now you are getting somewhere.
Why swimmer needs water to swim?
Wouldn't he just drop to the bottom if there was no water to sink below him and hold him?
(Hold him against what?)
Simple Because, self-weight of water is more than self-weight of human. Your magic buoyancy has not a role here.
time
Prove the existance of buoyancy force first. It is absent. It is imaginary. It is fake.
Simple Because, self-weight of water is more than self-weight of human. Your magic buoyancy has not a role here.No magic is needed.
time
Prove the existance of buoyancy force first. It is absent. It is imaginary. It is fake.
Ships float, is the action of buoyancy, when object displaces it's weight in a fluid, it floats, this action we call buoyancy.
Nope. There is nothing can prove the buoyancy. If something has unit weight less than water stands on it; if more than sinks. Why do you need to create a magic word as buoyancy? What is its role here other than being a fake argument?Simple Because, self-weight of water is more than self-weight of human. Your magic buoyancy has not a role here.No magic is needed.
Again, these pressure variations are measurable. There is plenty of evidence supporting their existence.
Nope. There is nothing can prove the buoyancy. If something has unit weight less than water stands on it; if more than sinks. Why do you need to create a magic word as buoyancy? What is its role here other than being a fake argument?You are the one appealing to magic here. Buoyancy is measurable and is only created to explain reality. Gravity explains buoyancy.
You are the one appealing to magic here.Your baseless claims have not any value but BS.
Buoyancy is measurable and is only created to explain reality.Nope. You can not measure something absent. It is theorically absent, practically absent, no need to it. And thanksfully you have accepted it has "CREATED". Yeah, it is absent but created, faked for faking, manipulating the reality.
Gravity explains buoyancy.Gravity since absent can not explain anything.
It gives a reason for the existence of the real, measurable pressure gradient which causes the buoyant force.Nope. The only reason water lifting anything that its self-weight is less than water. That's all. You already know this but childishly manipulating the issue. Your lies, repeating same lies again and again can not change the facts.
It also matches the real measurable buoyant force.Again and again, thre isn't anything as buoyant force. the force applied upwardly to the object is equal to the force calculated due to the difference in self-weight between water. water does not lift anything but your childish imagination.
<continoues BS>Now grow up and give up talk nonsences like buoyancy. This behave does not make your argument magically stronger but makes your more childish and a hopeless case.
<continoues BS>I see no where in that pile of BS did you even attempt to deal with what has been presented.
<continoues BS>
Fish living under 3000 meters of water proves that your claim is a BS.How?
you can't breathe under high pressure.Why?
How?There is 3000 toms/mt pressure under 3000 metres depth.Get it now? Again, I guess you have a problem of understanding.
Do you mean how some are unable to survive near the surface as the pressure is too low?I think I mean opposite of your saying. Stop to manipulate what I say. G>row up. Your manipulating the issue proves how you are hopeless hope a manipulation helps you.
Again, a simple balloon proves my claim to be correct.How again? Claiming its proving anything only proves how you are ignorant. Simple baloon experiment proves you are wrong. Because baloon beats the so called gravity.
Why?Watch how an anaconda kills animals. as the animal exhales, it squeezes more and makes it impossible for him to breathe again. clearly the fish will not be able to use it again due to high pressure at the time it uses the gills. this is proof that the pressure diagram is a lie. Since I have proved pressure diagram is a lie so gravity is disproved one more time. Thanks for your help me to disprove it one more time. You can proud yourself to help me to disprove the gravity. Actually, I did not need your help, but anyways.
<more BS<Again, give up childish behave and accept the gravity is a hoax like I have many times proved. Your onle action was just childishly objectiing the facts without any arguments. Your childish behaviour does not magically make gravity exist. Because it has definitely debunked at the moment, without any doubt. Grow up and accept you have lost.
Again, give up childish behave and accept the gravity is a hoax like I have many times proved. Your onle action was just childishly objectiing the facts without any arguments. Your childish behaviour does not magically make gravity exist. Because it has definitely debunked at the moment, without any doubt.Incorrect!
Your claiming its being incorrect without presenting any argument proves your agreing its being true and you've agreed the earth is flat.Again, give up childish behave and accept the gravity is a hoax like I have many times proved. Your onle action was just childishly objectiing the facts without any arguments. Your childish behaviour does not magically make gravity exist. Because it has definitely debunked at the moment, without any doubt.Incorrect!
Nope. The only reason water lifting anything that its self-weight is less than water. That's all. You already know this but childishly manipulating the issue. Your lies, repeating same lies again and again can not change the facts.
There is 3000 toms/mt pressure under 3000 metres depth.I have no idea what you are trying to say there.
I think I mean opposite of your saying.So you mean the complete opposite of reality?
How again?I already explained, but you ignored it because it so easily shows you are wrong.
Simple baloon experiment proves you are wrong. Because baloon beats the so called gravity.No it doesn't, as already explained to you.
Watch how an anaconda kills animals.In a way fundamentally different to pressure.
Since I have proved pressure diagram is a lieYou have proven no such thing.
<more pathetic, childish, bovine excrement>You repeatedly asserting that you can't breathe with some pressure doesn't magically make it true.
<more pathetic, childish, bovine excrement>Posting more pathetic images to try and avoid debate wont help you.
(https://i.resimyukle.xyz/UAMRfJ.png)
(https://i.resimyukle.xyz/UU7G7U.png)