3 can be answered easily by models with two poles I think though I am not entirely clear on what you're asking.Can't have two poles, an object can only have one axis of rotation.
Again, sig, I'm only giving the gist here.3 can be answered easily by models with two poles I think though I am not entirely clear on what you're asking.Can't have two poles, an object can only have one axis of rotation.
I don’t understand. I don’t want to delve into yet another Flat Earth model, I just want to have the questions answered from the general FE perspective.Yes, two poles helps then.
In regards to the 3rd point - the pic is related.
https://m.imgur.com/scj8iTW
I don’t understand. I don’t want to delve into yet another Flat Earth model, I just want to have the questions answered from the general FE perspective.Yes, two poles helps then.
In regards to the 3rd point - the pic is related.
https://m.imgur.com/scj8iTW
If you don't want to learn an FE model, don't ask questions about FET.
I don’t understand. I don’t want to delve into yet another Flat Earth model, I just want to have the questions answered from the general FE perspective.Yes, two poles helps then.
In regards to the 3rd point - the pic is related.
https://m.imgur.com/scj8iTW
If you don't want to learn an FE model, don't ask questions about FET.
I haven’t met anyone supporting what seems to be your own system built ad hoc yet, so I want to discuss just the most popular model of Flat Earth.
And you know, if you don’t want to discuss the one-sided Flat Earth with me, you can always leave ;)
“you're just wasting our time”
I’m not. You’re free to leave, buddy!
Cheers ;)
“you're just wasting our time”
I’m not. You’re free to leave, buddy!
Cheers ;)
Except I know how this goes. I've seen your roundie bs before. You'll spam us with questions, each of which needs a pretty long answer, and when no one bothers with all that given you've demonstrated several times over you aren't actually interested in learning (not reading the FAQ is always red flag one, ignoring answers given because they aren't in line with the FE model you want to argue against is another) then in a few days you or one of your ilk will pop by, point out FEers didn't answer, and claim victory based on that whining.
So no, I'm not letting you get away with it.
Look at how you even ignored most of my post.
There is an entire section devoted to the evidence, as you know full well.“you're just wasting our time”
I’m not. You’re free to leave, buddy!
Cheers ;)
Except I know how this goes. I've seen your roundie bs before. You'll spam us with questions, each of which needs a pretty long answer, and when no one bothers with all that given you've demonstrated several times over you aren't actually interested in learning (not reading the FAQ is always red flag one, ignoring answers given because they aren't in line with the FE model you want to argue against is another) then in a few days you or one of your ilk will pop by, point out FEers didn't answer, and claim victory based on that whining.
So no, I'm not letting you get away with it.
Look at how you even ignored most of my post.
It would be great if you published some information on which all thee claims you make are based. I and others have looked through your website and there is nothing there that goes anywhere close to explaining the claims you make regarding the sun, both its behaviour and composition. Its funny how every solar scientist on the planet disagrees with you. Can you explain?
There is an entire section devoted to the evidence, as you know full well.“you're just wasting our time”
I’m not. You’re free to leave, buddy!
Cheers ;)
Except I know how this goes. I've seen your roundie bs before. You'll spam us with questions, each of which needs a pretty long answer, and when no one bothers with all that given you've demonstrated several times over you aren't actually interested in learning (not reading the FAQ is always red flag one, ignoring answers given because they aren't in line with the FE model you want to argue against is another) then in a few days you or one of your ilk will pop by, point out FEers didn't answer, and claim victory based on that whining.
So no, I'm not letting you get away with it.
Look at how you even ignored most of my post.
It would be great if you published some information on which all thee claims you make are based. I and others have looked through your website and there is nothing there that goes anywhere close to explaining the claims you make regarding the sun, both its behaviour and composition. Its funny how every solar scientist on the planet disagrees with you. Can you explain?
Your lyign is just tedious at this point. Keep on spamming, it's not clever, it's just irritating. Why do you roundies think being annoying can take the place of actually being smart?
OK, if you say so, post it here and people can decide if it constitutes as evidence.It's linked. If you're too lazy to click a link, I am not going to waste time on you. It's readily available and linked in every post I make.
The way you looked at the Space X launch proves you have a pretty high bar as far as evidence goes.Look at that, trying to change the topic again.
Space X builds a rocket, launches it, deploys what turns out to be a car, and then lands two of the boosters in full view of the world.
You say some stuff and expect people to swallow it with no evidence! I see some double standards here.
OK, if you say so, post it here and people can decide if it constitutes as evidence.It's linked. If you're too lazy to click a link, I am not going to waste time on you. It's readily available and linked in every post I make.QuoteThe way you looked at the Space X launch proves you have a pretty high bar as far as evidence goes.Look at that, trying to change the topic again.
Space X builds a rocket, launches it, deploys what turns out to be a car, and then lands two of the boosters in full view of the world.
You say some stuff and expect people to swallow it with no evidence! I see some double standards here.
And, of course, openly lying, as is well established at this point. The evidence exists, the evidence is linked to every time.
If I remember I used to have a little challenge. i was tired of you ignoring everything I said, so I asked you a simple question, a simple 'what is wrong with my evidence?' and you evaded it every single time. I'm sure I can search for the threads, if you want to bring them back?
I don’t understand. I don’t want to delve into yet another Flat Earth model, I just want to have the questions answered from the general FE perspective.If you "don’t want to delve into yet another Flat Earth model" and want an answer from "the general FE perspective" you've come to the wrong place!
In regards to the 3rd point - the pic is related.
https://m.imgur.com/scj8iTW
Tfw I got actual replies on the tfes forum and none here. Only whining of this Jrowe dude.
PS: the one dude who answered on tfes replied to the first two points as “unknown” lmao. That also makes me doubt jrowes claim that he has the answer.
Tfw I got actual replies on the tfes forum and none here. Only whining of this Jrowe dude.
PS: the one dude who answered on tfes replied to the first two points as “unknown” lmao. That also makes me doubt jrowes claim that he has the answer.
As I said, you're not looking for an answer, stop pretending that you are.
I've read everything in your link, and whether you are too close to the issue to recognize how much is missing in your explanation of if you are just messing with people, I don't know. Either way, your "evidence" consists of saying that your model predicts everything that the conventional model predicts, so all evidence for the conventional model is also evidence of DET. You explain that your model is simpler because it consists of fewer assumptions, and conclude that it is, therefore, correct.There is an entire section devoted to the evidence, as you know full well.“you're just wasting our time”
I’m not. You’re free to leave, buddy!
Cheers ;)
Except I know how this goes. I've seen your roundie bs before. You'll spam us with questions, each of which needs a pretty long answer, and when no one bothers with all that given you've demonstrated several times over you aren't actually interested in learning (not reading the FAQ is always red flag one, ignoring answers given because they aren't in line with the FE model you want to argue against is another) then in a few days you or one of your ilk will pop by, point out FEers didn't answer, and claim victory based on that whining.
So no, I'm not letting you get away with it.
Look at how you even ignored most of my post.
It would be great if you published some information on which all thee claims you make are based. I and others have looked through your website and there is nothing there that goes anywhere close to explaining the claims you make regarding the sun, both its behaviour and composition. Its funny how every solar scientist on the planet disagrees with you. Can you explain?
Your lyign is just tedious at this point. Keep on spamming, it's not clever, it's just irritating. Why do you roundies think being annoying can take the place of actually being smart?
I've looked at your evidence section and I have to agree with the other poster, I didn't see any actual evidence.OK, if you say so, post it here and people can decide if it constitutes as evidence.It's linked. If you're too lazy to click a link, I am not going to waste time on you. It's readily available and linked in every post I make.QuoteThe way you looked at the Space X launch proves you have a pretty high bar as far as evidence goes.Look at that, trying to change the topic again.
Space X builds a rocket, launches it, deploys what turns out to be a car, and then lands two of the boosters in full view of the world.
You say some stuff and expect people to swallow it with no evidence! I see some double standards here.
And, of course, openly lying, as is well established at this point. The evidence exists, the evidence is linked to every time.
If I remember I used to have a little challenge. i was tired of you ignoring everything I said, so I asked you a simple question, a simple 'what is wrong with my evidence?' and you evaded it every single time. I'm sure I can search for the threads, if you want to bring them back?
Could someone explain to me how the Sun works in the Flat Earth model?I have often wondered those things and more.
Namely:
1. How is it able to be suspended 5000 kilometers above the giant 40 thousand kilometer long disc and why does it rotate? It obviously doesn’t comply with the laws of gravity, so what force causes it to behave so weirdly?
2. How is a ball that is 50 kilometers in diameter able to produce so much thermonuclear energy to not only light so much territory of Earth but also keep burning? How does it produce so much energy? How does it not run out of “fuel”?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
That’s all. I hope the discussion will be polite and civil. I just want to know what Flat Earth explanation could be behind all this.
Tfw I got actual replies on the tfes forum and none here. Only whining of this Jrowe dude.
PS: the one dude who answered on tfes replied to the first two points as “unknown” lmao. That also makes me doubt jrowes claim that he has the answer.
As I said, you're not looking for an answer, stop pretending that you are.
Literally no one proposed a solution to any problems posed by me. Had no one previously ever even thought of it?Numerous people have thought of these problems before.
I'm the most respected REST guy on this forum so no one will debate these points with me because they know I'll use logic to justify my claims.You should get on well with Shifter! He knows everything. We have that on (almost) the highest authority.
But I am an expert.;D ::) Yes, we already know that you are a "Self-made man who loves nothing more than worshipping his maker". ::) ;D
But please, you don't have to tell us mere mortals so often.
Some FET guys pretend their model answers these questions but never to my satisfaction.
You should get on well with Shifter! He knows everything. We have that on (almost) the highest authority.
Shifter claims to be one rung below God, so presumably above the Archangels, so Shifter should know.