Basic and understandable. Congratilations Pius.
Basic and understandable. Congratilations Pius.
Excellent video, scanned the entire water line horizon, much greater than the human field of vision, and flat, straight across, horizontal to plane earth.
Please see my "inverse tangent" thread. Flat Earth model impossible.
R.I.P Video
It is high time the FEers learn some math. The camera, even though expensive, is incapable of detecting the dip in the horizon.
(http://image.prntscr.com/image/ca06c28575de49b19cff1c7072c52e78.png)
I think that video has been debunked.
Note for FEers: Watch a ship set over the horizon. You can find how big the ship needs to be and how far it needs to be using my formula in the picture. Do your homework.
Please see my "inverse tangent" thread. Flat Earth model impossible.
What good is an argument when its premise is based on an assumption? It's like trying to convince someone The Walking Dead is a real life historical documentary.
Please see my "inverse tangent" thread. Flat Earth model impossible.
What good is an argument when its premise is based on an assumption? It's like trying to convince someone The Walking Dead is a real life historical documentary.
Your premise is also based on an assumption that doesn't stand up to observation.
Nope. Just more FE ignorance.
Basic and understandable. Congratilations Pius.
Excellent video, scanned the entire water line horizon, much greater than the human field of vision, and flat, straight across, horizontal to plane earth.Nope. No sign it is flat rather than curving with Earth, keeping at the same angle of depression just like you would expect on a round Earth, also with a somewhat sharp horizon as you would expect as such low resolution, unlike the haze you would expect for a flat Earth.
Please see my "inverse tangent" thread. Flat Earth model impossible.
What good is an argument when its premise is based on an assumption? It's like trying to convince someone The Walking Dead is a real life historical documentary.
Your premise is also based on an assumption that doesn't stand up to observation.
No SINGLE camera shot on BE or FE taken from any height at any angle can prove any curvature of earths surface. The most you can get from any single image is a 2D profile.
We need more info to tell us its curved, it could spin, we can rely on perspective, many more options.
Sure,"Basic and understandable" and completely wrong.How Flat Earth was proven by EGA, Pius Bisong (http://)Basic and understandable. Congratilations Pius.
The video is too good and so much interesting. But I have a question that why the view gets stopped at the horizon point?
---------------------------------
Regards
Elda Bravo
Mobile application development India (http://www.theappsmiths.com/mobile-application-development.php) | iPhone app development India (http://www.theappsmiths.com/iphone-app-development.php)
They say it disappears due to perspective or not enough zoom ::)Please see my "inverse tangent" thread. Flat Earth model impossible.
What good is an argument when its premise is based on an assumption? It's like trying to convince someone The Walking Dead is a real life historical documentary.
Your premise is also based on an assumption that doesn't stand up to observation.
No SINGLE camera shot on BE or FE taken from any height at any angle can prove any curvature of earths surface. The most you can get from any single image is a 2D profile.
We need more info to tell us its curved, it could spin, we can rely on perspective, many more options.
Did you bother reading my post? How much curvature do you want to see? If you want to see a curvature of 10 degrees, you need to reach an altitude of 1000km. You don't see it with naked eye.
After proving the video in the initial post wrong, I also gave an experiment you could try. Ships are around 100m tall, you can see the ship disappear over the horizon after it travels 35km.
35km isn't big. This is doable. Go try it.
Basic and understandable and totally untrue.
Basic and understandable. Congratilations Pius.
The guy in this video starts out by saying "the camera never lies" and then uses his camera to "prove" that the Earth is flat.
If the camera never lies, then what about all the cameras that have lied when proving that the Earth isn't flat?
If wise says something and you have an objection then you have discovered yet another real life example of what the dictionary defines as an oxymoron.
Camera never lies so the earth is flat. Give up to be moron.
Camera never lies so the earth is flat. Give up to be moron.
Well then, look at this camera image from Egyptsat-A
(https://i.ibb.co/Hxnv54p/Space-Camera.png)
Camera never lies so the earth is flat. Give up to be moron.
Well then, look at this camera image from Egyptsat-A
(https://i.ibb.co/Hxnv54p/Space-Camera.png)
Why aren't any of cameras 360 degrees?