Most of your arguments rest upon the presuppositions that NASA and the government have been lying to us. How, may I ask, do you know this?
Well correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the original evidence for a flat earth was simply "Look out your window." This has nothing to do with NASA.
Then why is any evidence from NASA immediately dismissed as fake when trying to show that the view from "out your window" is not sufficient evidence to support the notion of a flat earth.Well correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the original evidence for a flat earth was simply "Look out your window." This has nothing to do with NASA.
Exactly. FEers aren't nearly as obsessed with the govt lying as the RE who come here.
Then why is any evidence from NASA immediately dismissed as fake when trying to show that the view from "out your window" is not sufficient evidence to support the notion of a flat earth.Well correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the original evidence for a flat earth was simply "Look out your window." This has nothing to do with NASA.
Exactly. FEers aren't nearly as obsessed with the govt lying as the RE who come here.
So this photograph, not even from NASA, proves that the earth is a globe then?Well correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the original evidence for a flat earth was simply "Look out your window." This has nothing to do with NASA.Exactly. FEers aren't nearly as obsessed with the govt lying as the RE who come here.
So this photograph, not even from NASA, proves that the earth is a globe then?Well correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the original evidence for a flat earth was simply "Look out your window." This has nothing to do with NASA.Exactly. FEers aren't nearly as obsessed with the govt lying as the RE who come here.
:P So, shut up shop. The earth is proven to be a Globe. :P
I wasn't questioning your premise. ;D All we need now is SCG's agreement. ;DSo this photograph, not even from NASA, proves that the earth is a globe then?Well correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the original evidence for a flat earth was simply "Look out your window." This has nothing to do with NASA.Exactly. FEers aren't nearly as obsessed with the govt lying as the RE who come here.
:P So, shut up shop. The earth is proven to be a Globe. :P
I agree with your proof.
But the OP was that the premise of the FE argument or belief was that NASA was lying. This is what I disagreed with.
So this photograph, not even from NASA, proves that the earth is a globe then?Well correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the original evidence for a flat earth was simply "Look out your window." This has nothing to do with NASA.Exactly. FEers aren't nearly as obsessed with the govt lying as the RE who come here.(http://i1075.photobucket.com/albums/w433/RabDownunder/Earth%20from%20Space/Himawari%20Real-Time%20Image%200140%20UTC%2012%20February%202017%20Full%20Disk%20Full%20Color%20reproduction%20Image._zpskblw1xql.png)That photo was taken at 01:40 UTC 12 February 2017 or 11:40 AM local time, downloaded it at 11:47 AM local time.
Himawari Real-Time Image 01:40 UTC 12 February 2017, Full Disk, Full Color reproduction Image.
Of course, it is not shown rotating there, but I could get a time-lapse fro EPIC on DSCOVR to rectify that.
:P So, shut up shop. The earth is proven to be a Globe. :P
You do have funny eggs at your place.So this photograph, not even from NASA, proves that the earth is a globe then?Well correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the original evidence for a flat earth was simply "Look out your window." This has nothing to do with NASA.Exactly. FEers aren't nearly as obsessed with the govt lying as the RE who come here.(http://i1075.photobucket.com/albums/w433/RabDownunder/Earth%20from%20Space/Himawari%20Real-Time%20Image%200140%20UTC%2012%20February%202017%20Full%20Disk%20Full%20Color%20reproduction%20Image._zpskblw1xql.png)That photo was taken at 01:40 UTC 12 February 2017 or 11:40 AM local time, downloaded it at 11:47 AM local time.
Himawari Real-Time Image 01:40 UTC 12 February 2017, Full Disk, Full Color reproduction Image.
Of course, it is not shown rotating there, but I could get a time-lapse fro EPIC on DSCOVR to rectify that.
:P So, shut up shop. The earth is proven to be a Globe. :P
Kindly point out what the measurements are of the supposed "globe," according to that picture...
Looks more like an egg to me.
That photo proves that someone can make pretty pictures.Just a bit more than that. It proves that I can get the current version of that photo of the "Eastern Hemisphere" made to order in a few tens of minutes.
They can make pretty pictures really fast! Don't know what this has to do with REers obsession with the lying govt.It is more like Flattie's obsession that everyone else in lying as soon as any evidence against the flat earth pops up, which is every day!
P1) If personally unverifiable evidence contradicts an obvious truth then the evidence is fabricatedAnd obviously satellite photos, astronomical observations, reports of others visiting Antarctica, reports of others performing measurements, etc are all (for most of us) personally unverifiable.
P2) The FET (Flat Earth Theory) is an obvious truth
P3) There is personally unverifiable evidence that contradicts the FET
C1) The unverifiable evidence that contradicts the FET is fabricated evidence
P4) If there is large amounts of fabricated evidence then there must be a conspiracy to fabricate it
P5) There is a large amount of fabricated evidence (see C1)
C2) There must be a conspiracy to fabricate it.
Yes, the earth is flat!And your whole argument seems to be "the earth is flat" because "the earth is flat".
Look outside and see what it looks like. Really, rab, you should go outside sometimes.I often go outside, even at night and see the stars rotating clockwise about a single point due south.
(http://i1075.photobucket.com/albums/w433/RabDownunder/Horizon/Scarborough%20Horizon%20past%20Beacon_zpsestuuzhe.jpg) Scarborough, Horizon past Beacon | (http://i1075.photobucket.com/albums/w433/RabDownunder/Horizon/Scarborough%20Beacon%20on%20Horizon_zps3et5nloo.jpg) Scarborough, Beacon on Horizon |
Distance = 2.61 km, View Height = 0.54 meters, Radius = 6371 kmI should point out that I was crouching at the edge of the water (not wanting to get me or the camera wet) and did not measure the camera height, but 0.5 m or so seems right.
Horizon = 2.61 km, Bulge = 0.13 meters, Drop = 0.53 meters
Hidden = None, horizon is beyond the target distance
Distance = 2.61 km, View Height = 3 meters, Radius = 6371 km.There is no easy of estimating the horizon distance from the photograph from the photograph, but it is certainly well past the beacon's known 2.61 km.
Horizon = 6.18 km, Bulge = 0.13 meters
Drop = 0.53 meters, Hidden= None, horizon is beyond the target distance