The Flat Earth Society

Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth Debate => Topic started by: narcberry on November 15, 2016, 05:37:31 PM

Title: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
Post by: narcberry on November 15, 2016, 05:37:31 PM
Let's find out what the numbers, and whether RE'ers are serious about science.
Title: Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
Post by: RocksEverywhere on November 16, 2016, 01:45:05 AM
We get it, you're an annoying troll, now go play with your dolls.
Title: Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
Post by: southern hemispherer on November 16, 2016, 01:59:25 AM
Yet another attempt at a joke by a FE'er, who by definition is a joke himself. Why not divert the discussions away from the ones FE'ers cannot answer so that the roundies can forget about them. Go and try to answer some of the serious posts rather than showing your true intentions.
Title: Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
Post by: rabinoz on November 16, 2016, 02:14:52 AM
Let's find out what the numbers, and whether RE'ers are serious about science.
Sure! A typical Flat Earth poll with all idiotic biased options!

Thanks for participating in this scientific poll meant to arrive at a data-based conclusion. Flat Earthers are ...
Select all that are applicable.

No, I would not claim that sort of thing.
In fact, I don't know many that are complete bigots like yourself who do their best to twist all evidence.

Still, it is what we expect from a character like yourself. Luckily there are not many in your league.
Title: Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
Post by: IonSpen on November 16, 2016, 08:36:59 AM
Another defeat to FET!!
Title: Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
Post by: Crouton on November 16, 2016, 06:01:26 PM
How is it that narcberries threads aren't moved into angry ranting? Does his seniority grant him a certain level of protection?
Title: Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
Post by: Alpha2Omega on November 16, 2016, 06:53:13 PM
Poll is incomplete. OP forgot to add:

o When did you stop beating your wife?
Title: Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
Post by: narcberry on November 17, 2016, 05:35:46 PM
I have to say, I expected some negative reaction to the data - but really RE'ers lets keep the debate constructive and reasonable.

Thanks,
Flat Earth Moderator
Title: Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
Post by: Luke 22:35-38 on November 17, 2016, 06:54:06 PM
What a completely one sided poll.
Title: Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
Post by: Son of Orospu on November 17, 2016, 07:45:10 PM
Stop mocking the poles, dammit. 
Title: Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
Post by: rabinoz on November 17, 2016, 10:06:37 PM
I have to say, I expected some negative reaction to the data - but really RE'ers lets keep the debate constructive and reasonable.

Thanks,
Flat Earth Moderator
With your usual deviousness, you construct a one sided poll, then ask for "the debate constructive and reasonable."
Title: Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
Post by: narcberry on November 26, 2016, 12:29:18 AM
Don't get butthurt about the data, man
Title: Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
Post by: rabinoz on November 26, 2016, 12:39:30 AM
Don't get butthurt about the data, man
What data? As usual you have no data and no evidence, just "the Narc" says. That just means nothing at all.

I claim "RET is consistent with science, but FET (in all it's numerous guises) is quite inconsistent.

Any objections?
Title: Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
Post by: southern hemispherer on November 26, 2016, 01:14:22 AM
Why no Donald Trump option? He won the last biassed FE poll, so no doubt he would win this one too!
When will these stupid polls be banned?
Title: Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
Post by: narcberry on November 26, 2016, 11:43:43 AM
Don't get butthurt about the data, man
What data? As usual you have no data and no evidence, just "the Narc" says. That just means nothing at all.

I claim "RET is consistent with science, but FET (in all it's numerous guises) is quite inconsistent.

Any objections?

You got as many votes as I did.