The Flat Earth Society

Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth General => Topic started by: Papa Legba on May 15, 2016, 05:55:38 AM

Title: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 15, 2016, 05:55:38 AM
...in space, throwing medicine balls.

Proves something about the ability of a Finite amount of gas to create pressure in an Infinite vacuum, according to our noob Oz-shill pal 'disputeone'...

Off you go, 'Ozshillone'; tell us all about it!
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 15, 2016, 07:09:27 AM
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=66748.0 (https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=66748.0)

Got to you have I?
I think we'll continue this in complete nonsense by the looks.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 15, 2016, 08:22:12 AM
Got to you have I?

More Satanic Inversion, Mini-Me?

Now; Satan, on a skateboard, in space, chucking medicine balls like the very devil he in fact is...

Tells us what about the behaviour of a Finite amount of Gas introduced into an Infinite vacuum, precisely?

Also, seems you've been up all night in Oz replying to my posts with your inane pseudo-Diabolical shill-shit...

Is this another Satanic Inversion?

Or are you just mental?

(lol we all know what you are!)
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: sokarul on May 15, 2016, 08:36:36 AM
I foresee this thread in complete nonsense soon.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 15, 2016, 08:54:17 AM
I foresee this thread in complete nonsense soon.

Did you use your shpooky Occult powers to make that prophesy?

Seems every twat round here's got em now...

But nobody wants to talk about the Dark Lord's medicine ball throwing space-boarding feats.

Which will somehow prove something about some shit...

None of which will remotely concern the behaviour of gasses in a vacuum, but meh.

This forum has been over-run by nutters, so I'm just trying to give em something to rant & rave about...
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Mainframes on May 15, 2016, 09:08:46 AM
And once again Papa demonstrates that he has no idea why gases behave in the way that they do and what that behaviour would be in a given set of circumstances.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 15, 2016, 09:19:08 AM
Says the man who did not not know what the terms 'force' or 'evacuated' meant until I told him, as well as sundry other lulzy gaffes...

Are you gonna brag on your imaginary degree in Alchemical Falsification from Hogwarts or wherever again, too, Walter Mitty?

Anyhoo; stick to the topic: Satan, on a skateboard, chucking medicine balls... in SPACE!!!
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Mainframes on May 15, 2016, 09:33:47 AM
Says the man who did not not know what the terms 'force' or 'evacuated' meant until I told him, as well as sundry other lulzy gaffes...

Are you gonna brag on your imaginary degree in Alchemical Falsification from Hogwarts or wherever again, too, Walter Mitty?

Anyhoo; stick to the topic: Satan, on a skateboard, chucking medicine balls... in SPACE!!!


No you're the muppet that didn't realise that 'evacuated chamber' was emphasising the word chamber and that it destroyed you're understanding of the term free expansion.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: sokarul on May 15, 2016, 09:37:25 AM
I foresee this thread in complete nonsense soon.

Did you use your shpooky Occult powers to make that prophesy?

Seems every twat round here's got em now...

But nobody wants to talk about the Dark Lord's medicine ball throwing space-boarding feats.

Which will somehow prove something about some shit...

None of which will remotely concern the behaviour of gasses in a vacuum, but meh.

This forum has been over-run by nutters, so I'm just trying to give em something to rant & rave about...

I used my psychologist powers.


Lol


Yes I was making fun of you. 


Lol
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 15, 2016, 09:49:48 AM
'evacuated chamber' was emphasising the word chamber and that it destroyed you're understanding of the term free expansion.

LOL!!!

Sure it was & sure it did, Walter Mitty...

Completely 'destroyed' your ability to spell 'your' correctly, too, it seems.

You sad sack.

Yes I was making fun of you.

...with Autism!
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: markjo on May 15, 2016, 10:11:02 AM
...in space, throwing medicine balls.

Proves something about the ability of a Finite amount of gas to create pressure in an Infinite vacuum, according to our noob Oz-shill pal 'disputeone'...
*sigh*  Let's try this step by step.

Papa Legba, do you agree that throwing medicine balls is a demonstration of Newton's 3rd law (action/reaction)?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: MrDebunk on May 15, 2016, 10:54:22 AM
Hmm ... Papa Legba ... This reminds me of something.

Jesus Christ on a motorbike! That got crisped on the ballistic entry!

You blatantly copied me like a camouflaged parrot! "Satan on a skateboard" is this thread's name. I said "Jesus Christ on a motorbike!" You couldn't get away with this!
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 15, 2016, 11:08:01 AM
LOL!!!

Teh Three Stooges are back together: Markjo, Mainframes & Socky-boy...

Huzzah!

And they STILL want to treat the behaviour of Gasses exactly the same as the behaviour of Solids...

Nostalgia-fest!

Anyhoo:

*sigh*  Let's try this step by step.

No, Curly/Larry/Moe; let's not.

Cos I've got you on record as saying that a non-zero F can be created from F=ma even when m is 0.

So don't get ahead of your stooge self, eh?

Cos you clearly don't understand Newton's 2nd, let alone his 3rd...

Now - Satan; skateboard; balls; space; paint a picture for me, stooges!

Oh, & MrJREF; you can't play.

So sling your creepy weirdo stalker hook.

Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: markjo on May 15, 2016, 11:28:46 AM
Cos I've got you on record as saying that a non-zero F can be created from F=ma even when m is 0.
Then you shouldn't have any trouble providing a relevant quote.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 15, 2016, 11:31:01 AM
No, I shouldn't.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Blue_Moon on May 15, 2016, 11:40:29 AM
No, I shouldn't.

Then do so.  You're the one who dropped out of high school physics. 
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: markjo on May 15, 2016, 11:41:43 AM
No, I shouldn't.
But I'm guessing that you won't, because that would be evidence that supports your claim, and we all know that isn't your style.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 15, 2016, 11:45:21 AM
Just did.

It's on the thread above this.

I'll bump it again if you like?

You're pretty thick, aintcha?

Go get some sock-puppets to say you're not, eh?

Maybe the idiots'll believe you then?

Everybody else will hate you...

But you're used to that.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: markjo on May 15, 2016, 11:47:28 AM
Just did.

It's on the thread above this.
What's wrong, don't you know how to copy a quote from one thread to another?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 15, 2016, 11:51:55 AM
What's wrong, can't remember what you wrote?

Why not get a bunch of sock-puppets to tell me you can?

Like that Blue_Moon twat?

You don't understand Newton's 2nd, markjo2900; the evidence is there for all to see.

Only idiots believe a single thing you write now...

Everybody else hates you.

Just pointing out facts, markjo.

Everybody. Hates. YOU.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: markjo on May 15, 2016, 12:09:34 PM
What's wrong, can't remember what you wrote?
I remember what I wrote.

I remember the mass that I was referring to in that post that you keep shitspamming as being the mass of the atmosphere that you claim that rockets must push against.

I also remember not getting an answer.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 15, 2016, 12:35:16 PM
I also remember not getting an answer.

You answered it yourself.

Because I asked you to, remember?

You said F=ma would still produce a force even if m=0.

Then, when I laughed at you, you said a physicist would laugh at me for laughing at you!

You are mental.

And everybody hates you.

Because they are sick of you & your crony's disgusting behaviour.

You cannot understand this because you are a psychopath.

And psychopaths cannot understand emotions.

But I can.

Which is why I insisted on fighting you all Alone.

So that everybody would see what you truly are.

And they have.

And they hate you for it.

Karma, old man...

It's a bitch.

Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: markjo on May 15, 2016, 12:48:15 PM
I also remember not getting an answer.

You answered it yourself.

Because I asked you to, remember?

You said F=ma would still produce a force even if m=0.
Again, that was in the context of the mass being the mass of the atmosphere that you insist that rocket engines must push against.

It's amazing how easy seems when you take my argument out of context, isn't it?

Then, when I laughed at you, you said a physicist would laugh at me for laughing at you!
Yes, a physicist would laugh at you for insisting that a rocket must push against the atmosphere.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 15, 2016, 12:57:18 PM
that was in the context of the mass being the mass of the atmosphere that you insist that rocket engines must push against.

No it wasn't.

Stop lying you old fraud.

Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: markjo on May 15, 2016, 01:05:19 PM
that was in the context of the mass being the mass of the atmosphere that you insist that rocket engines must push against.

No it wasn't.

Stop lying you old fraud.

rockets work using most simple tenet of conservation of momentum.

No they don't.

They work via the formula Force=Pressure x Area, the Force being created via Newton's 3rd law as the rocket exhaust Presses against the external mass of the atmosphere at the Area of the nozzle exit.

Ergo, No Atmosphere = No Force.
Cool story, bro.  Except that in your beloved F = Pressure x Area, there is no term for mass, so how do you determine how much atmospheric mass the force needs to push against?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 15, 2016, 01:25:32 PM
And now you're posting the wrong quote...

Which will make everybody hate you even more.

Cos you do realise they can go back & read the whole thing, don't you?

The idiots won't get it, but the smart ones will...

And increased hatred shall ensue.

King markjo Canute, on his waterlogged skateboard, throwing medicine balls at the incoming tide...

lol.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: markjo on May 15, 2016, 03:04:56 PM
And now you're posting the wrong quote...
Nope.  I posted the quote that provided the context of the quote that you keep shitspamming as if it's supposed to prove something.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: JohnRozz on May 15, 2016, 03:19:42 PM
markjo [29000+] f.m.
sokarul [11000+] f.m.
rabinoz [1500+] f.m.
Mainframes [1500+] f.m.
Jadyyn [1300+] f.m.
Definitely Not Official [900+] f.m.
Frenat [900+] f.m.
getrealzommb [500+] f.m.
Blue_Moon [400+] f.m.
disputeone [100+] f.m. (satanist, like any of these (cock)suckers, but he's not afraid to show us)
NewtSmooth [100+] f.m.
uCantBeSerious [100+] f.m.


WELCOME FREEMASONS. WE'VE WATCHING YOU, IT'S NOT YOU WATCHING US. YOU CAN KISS MY ASS.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: JohnRozz on May 15, 2016, 03:32:15 PM
either you're some of the worst losers in the world, and you're wasting your lives (actually, it's crystal clear you are, btw...) with a bunch of morons on a forum, or there's something goin' on here.

if it's not, then leave, what's your goal? what do you want from us?

I know who you are and what you're doing, but the fraud is exposed and your castle made of LIES will go... SOUTH!

YOU KNOW WHAT, YOU SUCKERS, THINGS ARE GOING SOUTH FOR YOU, LITERALLY.

(http://welcome-to-concave-earth-forum.70389.x6.nabble.com/file/n127/bdjJfL2.png)


Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: JohnRozz on May 15, 2016, 03:37:05 PM
(https://sites.google.com/a/zinoproject.com/z008---herb-zinser-science/_/rsrc/1429505296553/language-war/nikola-tesla/thenikolateslabrainalphawavewarreports/tesla%20%206%20energy%20of%20tsarnaev%20boston.PNG)
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Blue_Moon on May 15, 2016, 04:22:38 PM
markjo [29000+] f.m.
sokarul [11000+] f.m.
rabinoz [1500+] f.m.
Mainframes [1500+] f.m.
Jadyyn [1300+] f.m.
Definitely Not Official [900+] f.m.
Frenat [900+] f.m.
getrealzommb [500+] f.m.
Blue_Moon [400+] f.m.
disputeone [100+] f.m. (satanist, like any of these (cock)suckers, but he's not afraid to show us)
NewtSmooth [100+] f.m.
uCantBeSerious [100+] f.m.


WELCOME FREEMASONS. WE'VE WATCHING YOU, IT'S NOT YOU WATCHING US. YOU CAN KISS MY ASS.

What does that even mean?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 15, 2016, 04:47:38 PM
markjo [29000+] f.m.
sokarul [11000+] f.m.
rabinoz [1500+] f.m.
Mainframes [1500+] f.m.
Jadyyn [1300+] f.m.
Definitely Not Official [900+] f.m.
Frenat [900+] f.m.
getrealzommb [500+] f.m.
Blue_Moon [400+] f.m.
disputeone [100+] f.m. (satanist, like any of these (cock)suckers, but he's not afraid to show us)
NewtSmooth [100+] f.m.
uCantBeSerious [100+] f.m.


WELCOME FREEMASONS. WE'VE WATCHING YOU, IT'S NOT YOU WATCHING US. YOU CAN KISS MY ASS.

Nawww i got a special mention.
Are we going to move this to complete nonsense or are we going to let Papa carry on with his delusions.

We are watching John ;-)
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 15, 2016, 04:49:10 PM
markjo [29000+] f.m.
sokarul [11000+] f.m.
rabinoz [1500+] f.m.
Mainframes [1500+] f.m.
Jadyyn [1300+] f.m.
Definitely Not Official [900+] f.m.
Frenat [900+] f.m.
getrealzommb [500+] f.m.
Blue_Moon [400+] f.m.
disputeone [100+] f.m. (satanist, like any of these (cock)suckers, but he's not afraid to show us)
NewtSmooth [100+] f.m.
uCantBeSerious [100+] f.m.


WELCOME FREEMASONS. WE'VE WATCHING YOU, IT'S NOT YOU WATCHING US. YOU CAN KISS MY ASS.

What does that even mean?

I think it means he has a paranoid schizo affective disorder.

***Mental health is not a joke nor do i find it funny, i say this out of genuine concern***
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: FalseProphet on May 15, 2016, 04:52:02 PM
markjo [29000+] f.m.
sokarul [11000+] f.m.
rabinoz [1500+] f.m.
Mainframes [1500+] f.m.
Jadyyn [1300+] f.m.
Definitely Not Official [900+] f.m.
Frenat [900+] f.m.
getrealzommb [500+] f.m.
Blue_Moon [400+] f.m.
disputeone [100+] f.m. (satanist, like any of these (cock)suckers, but he's not afraid to show us)
NewtSmooth [100+] f.m.
uCantBeSerious [100+] f.m.


WELCOME FREEMASONS. WE'VE WATCHING YOU, IT'S NOT YOU WATCHING US. YOU CAN KISS MY ASS.

What does that even mean?

I think it means he has a paranoid schizo affective disorder.

***Mental health is not a joke nor do i find it funny, i say this out of genuine concern***

He is the new version of the Intikam FE bot. No match for the original.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: MrDebunk on May 15, 2016, 07:50:51 PM
markjo [29000+] f.m.
sokarul [11000+] f.m.
rabinoz [1500+] f.m.
Mainframes [1500+] f.m.
Jadyyn [1300+] f.m.
Definitely Not Official [900+] f.m.
Frenat [900+] f.m.
getrealzommb [500+] f.m.
Blue_Moon [400+] f.m.
disputeone [100+] f.m. (satanist, like any of these (cock)suckers, but he's not afraid to show us)
NewtSmooth [100+] f.m.
uCantBeSerious [100+] f.m.


WELCOME FREEMASONS. WE'VE WATCHING YOU, IT'S NOT YOU WATCHING US. YOU CAN KISS MY ASS.

Wait a minute ... You think I'm not a freemason?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 15, 2016, 08:04:25 PM
Must be doing something wrong.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: rabinoz on May 15, 2016, 09:04:57 PM
markjo [29000+] f.m.
sokarul [11000+] f.m.
rabinoz [1500+] f.m.
Mainframes [1500+] f.m.
Jadyyn [1300+] f.m.
Definitely Not Official [900+] f.m.
Frenat [900+] f.m.
getrealzommb [500+] f.m.
Blue_Moon [400+] f.m.
disputeone [100+] f.m. (satanist, like any of these (cock)suckers, but he's not afraid to show us)
NewtSmooth [100+] f.m.
uCantBeSerious [100+] f.m.


WELCOME FREEMASONS. WE'VE WATCHING YOU, IT'S NOT YOU WATCHING US. YOU CAN KISS MY ASS.
So you're going to call in the family! We are shivering in our (concrete) boots.

We are not watching you, we are only concerned with the facts, but you don't seem to have any!

You have finally admitted you have no logical arguments to support your "Precious Pepperoni Pizza Planet".

Once you start attacking your opponents and not the facts you've given up! You do know about "ad hominem" attacks.
Quote from: Wikipedia
ad hominem
Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a logical fallacy in which an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.

I for one have never had the slightest connection with Freemasons!

But thanks for your final admission the as far as you are concerned the Flat Earth is dead!

You might retrieve the situation if you can come up with solid evidence, but I doubt it.

You might notice that a lot of the strong opposition to the Flat Earth comes the Southern Hemisphere. Down here we know that the Flat Earth maps are ridiculously in error.
But, it's more that! There are dozens of things the Flat Earth simply has no explanation for.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 15, 2016, 10:00:58 PM
Free mason, Flat earth society definition:
Argues with facts, logic, reason and empirical evidence. Free mason.

Synonyms: Shill, Sock puppet, dispute.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 15, 2016, 10:52:11 PM
I posted the quote that provided the context

What context?

F=ma is F=ma; how does 'context' change the fact that you ended up saying that non-zero F can be created when m=0?

It's basic stuff, markjo29000; & you blew it.

So don't swan around making condescending remarks about Newton's Laws any more, you old mountebank.

Now; about Satan, on his shpayze-board, lobbing medicine balls...

Proves what, precisely?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Mainframes on May 16, 2016, 12:42:55 AM
I posted the quote that provided the context

What context?

F=ma is F=ma; how does 'context' change the fact that you ended up saying that non-zero F can be created when m=0?

It's basic stuff, markjo29000; & you blew it.

So don't swan around making condescending remarks about Newton's Laws any more, you old mountebank.

Now; about Satan, on his shpayze-board, lobbing medicine balls...

Proves what, precisely?

I think you missed the point that the mass of atmosphere was not the 'm' in the equation at all and hence could be any value including zero.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 16, 2016, 12:51:03 AM
I think you missed the point that the mass of atmosphere was not the 'm' in the equation at all and hence could be any value including zero.

I think you are trying to dig your shill-leader markjo out of a hole by lying about what was said.

But intelligent people will have gone & read it for themselves already & concluded markjo is full of shit.

You can keep pretending they haven't if you like, & ramp up the hate-factor some more?

Besides, you didn't even know what a 'force' is until I told you...

Maybe you'd like to deny that, too, just to add some bonus-hate?

Silly little man!
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 16, 2016, 02:03:16 AM
I posted the quote that provided the context

What context?

F=ma is F=ma; how does 'context' change the fact that you ended up saying that non-zero F can be created when m=0?

It's basic stuff, markjo29000; & you blew it.

So don't swan around making condescending remarks about Newton's Laws any more, you old mountebank.

Now; about Satan, on his shpayze-board, lobbing medicine balls...

Proves what, precisely?

Can you please write out your own explanation of what a "strawman argument is"
Please Papa, no trolling just what it means to you.
Toodle Pip.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 16, 2016, 02:11:38 AM
Yeah, it's what you're doing now.

Ditto the trolling.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 16, 2016, 02:13:53 AM
Here's the OP, in case you forgot:

...in space, throwing medicine balls.

Proves something about the ability of a Finite amount of gas to create pressure in an Infinite vacuum, according to our noob Oz-shill pal 'disputeone'...

Off you go, 'Ozshillone'; tell us all about it!
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 16, 2016, 02:17:27 AM
The OP should've landed this thread in complete nonsense, but i seem to have scared jroa off for a while, guess we are stuck here.

The infernal prince throwing a medicine ball in space is an example of an action reaction force pair.

A rocket shooting gas out at a high speed is another example of an action reaction force pair

F=ma force equals mass times acceleration, now what does is matter if the outside environment is atmospheric or not?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 16, 2016, 02:24:30 AM
i seem to have scared jroa off

LOL!!!

A rocket shooting gas out at a high speed is another example of an action reaction force pair

It is not.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 16, 2016, 02:35:19 AM

A rocket shooting gas out at a high speed is another example of an action reaction force pair

It is not.

Well, Papa just beat me in intellectual debate, anyone with a PHD in rocket science on? I can't handle the technical questions (sarcasm)
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 16, 2016, 02:43:00 AM
Well, Papa just beat me in intellectual debate

I did.

Still think jroa's scared of you btw, Anton La Ghey?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: markjo on May 16, 2016, 05:31:50 AM
I posted the quote that provided the context

What context?
This context:
rockets work using most simple tenet of conservation of momentum.

No they don't.

They work via the formula Force=Pressure x Area, the Force being created via Newton's 3rd law as the rocket exhaust Presses against the external mass of the atmosphere at the Area of the nozzle exit.

Ergo, No Atmosphere = No Force.
Cool story, bro.  Except that in your beloved F = Pressure x Area, there is no term for mass, so how do you determine how much atmospheric mass the force needs to push against?

F=ma is F=ma; how does 'context' change the fact that you ended up saying that non-zero F can be created when m=0?
Then you shouldn't have any trouble telling us how much atmospheric mass a rocket needs to push against in order to accelerate.


Now; about Satan, on his shpayze-board, lobbing medicine balls...

Proves what, precisely?
That rockets don't really need pressure in order to work. 

Rockets can just as easily use solid objects as the reaction mass and work just fine.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 16, 2016, 06:00:29 AM
rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

Never...

Ever...

EVER...

Go full retard.

Everybody knows you never go full retard.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: markjo on May 16, 2016, 06:55:24 AM
rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

Never...

Ever...

EVER...

Go full retard.

Everybody knows you never go full retard.
Why not?

You did when you said:
They work via the formula Force=Pressure x Area, the Force being created via Newton's 3rd law as the rocket exhaust Presses against the external mass of the atmosphere at the Area of the nozzle exit.

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 16, 2016, 08:52:13 AM
No way I'm getting a ban cos of your utter shitposting madness & incessant trolling, so I'll just leave this gibberish without comment, for intelligent people to be appalled by:

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

F=ma is F=ma; how does 'context' change the fact that you ended up saying that non-zero F can be created when m=0?
Then you shouldn't have any trouble telling us how much atmospheric mass a rocket needs to push against in order to accelerate.

Rockets can just as easily use solid objects as the reaction mass and work just fine.

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: markjo on May 16, 2016, 10:14:48 AM
No way I'm getting a ban cos of your utter shitposting madness & incessant trolling, so I'll just leave this gibberish without comment, for intelligent people to be appalled by:
Actually, you're more likely to receive a ban (or at least a warning) for quoting someone without adding a comment.  It's called low content posting because it adds nothing to the discussion.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 16, 2016, 01:33:31 PM
As everything you say is a lie, I'm gonna just keep leaving your gibberish without comment, for intelligent people to be appalled by:

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

F=ma is F=ma; how does 'context' change the fact that you ended up saying that non-zero F can be created when m=0?
Then you shouldn't have any trouble telling us how much atmospheric mass a rocket needs to push against in order to accelerate.

Rockets can just as easily use solid objects as the reaction mass and work just fine.

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

^This last one's a beauty!
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: markjo on May 16, 2016, 03:44:28 PM
As everything you say is a lie, I'm gonna just keep leaving your gibberish without comment, for intelligent people to be appalled by:
Intelligent people are appalled by your ignorance.

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.
Papa Legba has never heard of an ion thruster.

F=ma is F=ma; how does 'context' change the fact that you ended up saying that non-zero F can be created when m=0?
Then you shouldn't have any trouble telling us how much atmospheric mass a rocket needs to push against in order to accelerate.
Again, you show your intellectual dishonesty by ignoring the fact that you are the one who is claiming that a rocket must push against the mass of the atmosphere but refuse to explain how much atmospheric mass your rocket engine must push against.

Rockets can just as easily use solid objects as the reaction mass and work just fine.
Papa Legba has also never heard of a mass-driver.
Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_driver#Spacecraft-based_mass_drivers
A spacecraft could carry a mass driver as its primary engine. With a suitable source of electrical power (probably a nuclear reactor) the spaceship could then use the mass driver to accelerate pieces of matter of almost any sort, boosting itself in the opposite direction. At the smallest scale of reaction mass, this type of drive is called an ion drive.

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

^This last one's a beauty!
Yes, because it shows that your claim that rocket engines work by pressure pushing against atmospheric mass is utter nonsense.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 16, 2016, 03:54:22 PM
As everything you say is a lie, I'm gonna just keep leaving your gibberish without comment, for intelligent people to be appalled by:

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

F=ma is F=ma; how does 'context' change the fact that you ended up saying that non-zero F can be created when m=0?
Then you shouldn't have any trouble telling us how much atmospheric mass a rocket needs to push against in order to accelerate.

Rockets can just as easily use solid objects as the reaction mass and work just fine.

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

^This last one's a beauty!
Yes, because it shows that your claim that rocket engines work by pressure pushing against atmospheric mass is utter nonsense.

you are the one who is claiming that a rocket must push against the mass of the atmosphere but refuse to explain how much atmospheric mass your rocket engine must push against.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Pezevenk on May 17, 2016, 10:17:52 AM
markjo [29000+] f.m.
sokarul [11000+] f.m.
rabinoz [1500+] f.m.
Mainframes [1500+] f.m.
Jadyyn [1300+] f.m.
Definitely Not Official [900+] f.m.
Frenat [900+] f.m.
getrealzommb [500+] f.m.
Blue_Moon [400+] f.m.
disputeone [100+] f.m. (satanist, like any of these (cock)suckers, but he's not afraid to show us)
NewtSmooth [100+] f.m.
uCantBeSerious [100+] f.m.


WELCOME FREEMASONS. WE'VE WATCHING YOU, IT'S NOT YOU WATCHING US. YOU CAN KISS MY ASS.

WTF I'M A FREEMASON NOW??

Well that's something new...

Apparently you think I want to molest you as well. Uh no, thanks.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Pezevenk on May 17, 2016, 10:24:50 AM
(https://sites.google.com/a/zinoproject.com/z008---herb-zinser-science/_/rsrc/1429505296553/language-war/nikola-tesla/thenikolateslabrainalphawavewarreports/tesla%20%206%20energy%20of%20tsarnaev%20boston.PNG)

Oh look, Tesla said it, so it MUST be true! WOOO!!!
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 17, 2016, 06:53:13 PM
As everything you say is a lie, I'm gonna just keep leaving your gibberish without comment, for intelligent people to be appalled by:

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

F=ma is F=ma; how does 'context' change the fact that you ended up saying that non-zero F can be created when m=0?
Then you shouldn't have any trouble telling us how much atmospheric mass a rocket needs to push against in order to accelerate.

Rockets can just as easily use solid objects as the reaction mass and work just fine.

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

^This last one's a beauty!
Yes, because it shows that your claim that rocket engines work by pressure pushing against atmospheric mass is utter nonsense.

you are the one who is claiming that a rocket must push against the mass of the atmosphere but refuse to explain how much atmospheric mass your rocket engine must push against.

I thought the point of this thread was to attack me Papa, why go after markjo?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 17, 2016, 06:54:38 PM
Are you tired of me making you look ignorant in front of everyone?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: markjo on May 17, 2016, 08:20:08 PM
I thought the point of this thread was to attack me Papa, why go after markjo?
Duh!!  Because you're one of my many sock puppets, remember?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 17, 2016, 09:31:37 PM
Of course, how could i forget.

Well then Papa, please explain the forces involved in a coke bottle water and air pressure rocket.

Coke bottle  (one object) water (one object) how does the coke bottle lift off the ground?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 17, 2016, 09:32:52 PM
If he starts answering questions he'll eventually realise he's wrong, I hope.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 17, 2016, 11:50:21 PM
As everything you say is a lie, I'm gonna just keep leaving your gibberish without comment, for intelligent people to be appalled by:

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

F=ma is F=ma; how does 'context' change the fact that you ended up saying that non-zero F can be created when m=0?
Then you shouldn't have any trouble telling us how much atmospheric mass a rocket needs to push against in order to accelerate.

Rockets can just as easily use solid objects as the reaction mass and work just fine.

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

^This last one's a beauty!
Yes, because it shows that your claim that rocket engines work by pressure pushing against atmospheric mass is utter nonsense.

you are the one who is claiming that a rocket must push against the mass of the atmosphere but refuse to explain how much atmospheric mass your rocket engine must push against.

Coke bottle  (one object) water (one object) how does the coke bottle lift off the ground?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Mainframes on May 18, 2016, 12:11:55 AM
As everything you say is a lie, I'm gonna just keep leaving your gibberish without comment, for intelligent people to be appalled by:

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.


This is totally correct. You don't need pressure at all. Just ejecting any object with mass out the back will work. It just happens to be easiest to do it with pressurised exhaust gases.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 18, 2016, 12:40:11 AM
As everything you say is a lie, I'm gonna just keep leaving your gibberish without comment, for intelligent people to be appalled by:

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

F=ma is F=ma; how does 'context' change the fact that you ended up saying that non-zero F can be created when m=0?
Then you shouldn't have any trouble telling us how much atmospheric mass a rocket needs to push against in order to accelerate.

Rockets can just as easily use solid objects as the reaction mass and work just fine.

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

^This last one's a beauty!
Yes, because it shows that your claim that rocket engines work by pressure pushing against atmospheric mass is utter nonsense.

you are the one who is claiming that a rocket must push against the mass of the atmosphere but refuse to explain how much atmospheric mass your rocket engine must push against.

Coke bottle  (one object) water (one object) how does the coke bottle lift off the ground?

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

This is totally correct. You don't need pressure at all. Just ejecting any object with mass out the back will work. It just happens to be easiest to do it with pressurised exhaust gases.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 18, 2016, 01:08:58 AM
Is this what he always does instead of debating his ideas?

Showing less maturity than my 5 year old nephew at the moment legba.
Please answer my question, how does the coke bottle lift of the ground.
Should be easy for a man of your "intelligence"
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 18, 2016, 01:12:09 AM
If I am legitimately wrong, then debate me and prove me wrong.

If you can prove rockets don't work without atmospheric pressure i will apologize and admit i was wrong.
(instead of just copying and pasting to derail the thread and the fact i was wrong.)
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 18, 2016, 01:14:17 AM
As everything you say is a lie, I'm gonna just keep leaving your gibberish without comment, for intelligent people to be appalled by:

Coke bottle  (one object) water (one object) how does the coke bottle lift off the ground?

Are you trying to say the coke bottle won't lift off the ground? Cause it just shows how much thought and research you do before posting nonsense.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 18, 2016, 01:56:11 AM
So you get paid by the post rather than by the word?

Noted.

The OP, about Satan on a skateboard:

...in space, throwing medicine balls.

Proves something about the ability of a Finite amount of gas to create pressure in an Infinite vacuum, according to our noob Oz-shill pal 'disputeone'...

Off you go, 'Ozshillone'; tell us all about it!

I need more nonsense & capering to add to my collection...

Please oblige.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 18, 2016, 02:38:37 AM
So you get paid by the post rather than by the word?

Noted.

The OP, about Satan on a skateboard:

...in space, throwing medicine balls.

Proves something about the ability of a Finite amount of gas to create pressure in an Infinite vacuum, according to our noob Oz-shill pal 'disputeone'...

Off you go, 'Ozshillone'; tell us all about it!

I need more nonsense & capering to add to my collection...

Please oblige.

Alright I'll bite.

First you need to clarify your question.

The first part about Satan on a skateboard throwing medicine balls, that's an action reaction force pair, remember the post you were copying and pasting?

What do you think would happen if Satan was in space and threw a medicine ball half of his mass?
You haven't even answered that yet.

Secondly the part about a finite amount of gas creating pressure in an infinite vacuum. What pressure are you referring to? That is worded to be more of a riddle than a question.

I claimed that action reaction force pairs are the way rockets work in space, the rocket pushes fuel out very vast, propels the rocket up slower proportional to the weight of the rocket, the amount of fuel being pushed out, the speed in which the fuel is being pushed out, the air resistance, gravity etc.

The rocket will work the same way in space except without gravity and atmospheric pressures,  it will get an exact equal and opposite reaction from the fuel being ejected without having to deal with variables rockets have to overcome in Earths atmosphere.

Edit, do the coke bottle water and air pressure rocket Papa I think itll clear a lot up for you.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 18, 2016, 02:49:17 AM
The first part about Satan on a skateboard throwing medicine balls, that's an action reaction force pair

So a rocket has arms that throw a solid ball of gas into space?

lol.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 18, 2016, 03:05:26 AM
The first part about Satan on a skateboard throwing medicine balls, that's an action reaction force pair

So a rocket has arms that throw a solid ball of gas into space?

lol.

You have no idea how to debate do you?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 18, 2016, 03:10:08 AM
You have no idea how a rocket works.

Look:

What do you think would happen if Satan was in space and threw a medicine ball half of his mass?

Does a rocket have arms that throw a solid ball of gas into a vacuum?

Simple question, simple answer.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 18, 2016, 03:17:38 AM
No Papa, a rocket does not have arms that throw gas into space.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 18, 2016, 03:33:15 AM
What do you think would happen if Satan was in space and threw a medicine ball half of his mass?

a rocket does not have arms that throw gas into space.

See the problem there?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 18, 2016, 03:52:20 AM
I agree it's not a direct comparison.

Alright what would happen if a rocket shot fuel out of its exaust in space?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 18, 2016, 03:56:16 AM
What do you think would happen if Satan was in space and threw a medicine ball half of his mass?

a rocket does not have arms that throw gas into space.

I agree it's not a direct comparison.

You appear to be debating yourself...

Should I just leave you to it?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 18, 2016, 03:58:11 AM
Quote from: Papa Legba
You are ignoring this user
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 18, 2016, 04:06:58 AM
Welcome to my joke-collection.

As everything you say is a lie, I'm gonna just keep leaving your gibberish without comment, for intelligent people to be appalled by:

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

F=ma is F=ma; how does 'context' change the fact that you ended up saying that non-zero F can be created when m=0?
Then you shouldn't have any trouble telling us how much atmospheric mass a rocket needs to push against in order to accelerate.

Rockets can just as easily use solid objects as the reaction mass and work just fine.

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

^This last one's a beauty!
Yes, because it shows that your claim that rocket engines work by pressure pushing against atmospheric mass is utter nonsense.

you are the one who is claiming that a rocket must push against the mass of the atmosphere but refuse to explain how much atmospheric mass your rocket engine must push against.

Coke bottle  (one object) water (one object) how does the coke bottle lift off the ground?

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

This is totally correct. You don't need pressure at all. Just ejecting any object with mass out the back will work. It just happens to be easiest to do it with pressurised exhaust gases.

What do you think would happen if Satan was in space and threw a medicine ball half of his mass?

a rocket does not have arms that throw gas into space.

I agree it's not a direct comparison.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: markjo on May 18, 2016, 04:28:10 AM
If he starts answering questions he'll eventually realise he's wrong, I hope.
That's why he won't answer any questions.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 18, 2016, 05:00:09 AM
LOL!!!

This thread is neither a debate nor a Q&A session.

It is you Clowns capering for my amusement.

Now provide more lulzy quotes for my joke-book, please...

Perhaps expanding further on your contention that rockets do not require pressure in order to function will do the trick?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: sokarul on May 18, 2016, 06:00:09 AM
You want funny quotes?

"Atoms don't exist."
"Rockets can't work in a vacuum."
"Rocket engines push off the atmosphere."
"A gas molecule hitting another gas molecule can impart a force on a solid object, even if the object is 50 feet away."
"Exhaust stacking."
"Denpressure."
"Gravity is air pressure."
"Atmospheric pressure is self aware and knows the density of objects and makes rational decisions on how much to accelerate said object." 
"Inertia doesn't exist."
"Contrails don't exist because clouds don't exist."
"Chemtrails are fly ash."

Those should hold you over for awhile.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: markjo on May 18, 2016, 06:16:31 AM
Now provide more lulzy quotes for my joke-book, please...

How about this one:
Quote from: https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=34226.msg972273#msg972273
Like the other FE related boards, Flat Earth General is for serious discussion of the Flat Earth Society, The Conspiracy and Flat Earth Theory. Now, things aren't as strict in here as in Flat Earth Debate, but zero-content, off-topic or abusive posts are still against the rules.


Perhaps expanding further on your contention that rockets do not require pressure in order to function will do the trick?

Okay, how's this:
Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrically_powered_spacecraft_propulsion
An electrically powered spacecraft propulsion system uses electrical energy to change the velocity of a spacecraft. Most of these kinds of spacecraft propulsion systems work by electrically expelling propellant (reaction mass) at high speed, but electrodynamic tethers work by interacting with a planet's magnetic field.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 18, 2016, 06:37:03 AM
Well I couldn't read the first bit of your shitpost cos it contained schoolmarmish queefing about the rules & regs, which I have no intention of ever knowing.

As for your last bit, here is the definition of a rocket: "A cylindrical projectile that can be propelled to a great height or distance by the combustion of its contents, used typically as a firework or signal".

So I have no idea why you posted your 'electrical propulsion' nonsense.

Is Lying against the rules & regs?

Or gross stupidity?

If so, you & socky-boy would have been banned a million times over.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: markjo on May 18, 2016, 07:02:08 AM
Well I couldn't read the first bit of your shitpost cos it contained schoolmarmish queefing about the rules & regs, which I have no intention of ever knowing.
Yes, that's increasingly more obvious.

As for your last bit, here is the definition of a rocket: "A cylindrical projectile that can be propelled to a great height or distance by the combustion of its contents, used typically as a firework or signal".

That's one definition of a rocket.  Here's another one:
Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket
A rocket (from Italian rocchetto "bobbin"[1]) is a missile, spacecraft, aircraft or other vehicle that obtains thrust from a rocket engine. Rocket engine exhaust is formed entirely from propellant carried within the rocket before use.[2] Rocket engines work by action and reaction and push rockets forward simply by expelling their exhaust in the opposite direction at high speed, and can therefore work in the vacuum of space.


So I have no idea why you posted your 'electrical propulsion' nonsense.
Because not all forms of spacecraft propulsion are chemical rocket engines.

Is Lying against the rules & regs?
Not as far as you know.

Or gross stupidity?
If it was, then you would have been perma-banned long ago.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 18, 2016, 09:17:48 AM
Sorry but all I get from that is 'NO U!!!'.

Try speaking as if you're not a pubescent schoolgirl defending her fave boy-band on facebook, eh?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: markjo on May 18, 2016, 09:38:32 AM
Sorry but all I get from that is 'NO U!!!'.
Then maybe you should have a grown up read it to you and explain any big words that you don't understand.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 18, 2016, 09:54:15 AM
Sorry but all I get from that is 'NO U!!!'.

Try speaking as if you're not a pubescent schoolgirl defending her fave boy-band on facebook, eh?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: markjo on May 18, 2016, 10:24:13 AM
Sorry but all I get from that is 'NO U!!!'.

Try speaking as if you're not a pubescent schoolgirl defending her fave boy-band on facebook, eh?
Wake me up when you have something constructive to add to the discussion.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 18, 2016, 11:27:58 AM
Where's Wally, markjo?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Symptom on May 18, 2016, 06:03:44 PM
Why the fuck is this thread not in CN?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 18, 2016, 06:38:40 PM
Why the fuck is this thread not in CN?

I asked that on my first post in this thread. Alas we are still here.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Symptom on May 18, 2016, 06:58:18 PM
Hail Satan.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Stanton on May 18, 2016, 07:07:44 PM

Just pointing out facts, markjo.

Everybody. Hates. YOU.



I don't hate him.

Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Symptom on May 18, 2016, 07:43:25 PM
I love my Papa.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 18, 2016, 09:13:40 PM

Just pointing out facts, markjo.

Everybody. Hates. YOU.



I don't hate him.

Just for the record i think markjo is a fair and reasonable mod. The fact he didn't ban Papa for his recent threads shows this.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Stanton on May 18, 2016, 09:17:42 PM

Just for the record i think markjo is a fair and reasonable mod.



Had no idea he is a mod.
So, wasn't kissing ass.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Symptom on May 18, 2016, 09:41:21 PM
I don't think markjo is a mod. I could be wrong though, as I usually have to get drunk before I can be bothered to come here.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 18, 2016, 09:41:53 PM
As everything you say is a lie, I'm gonna just keep leaving your gibberish without comment, for intelligent people to be appalled by:

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

F=ma is F=ma; how does 'context' change the fact that you ended up saying that non-zero F can be created when m=0?
Then you shouldn't have any trouble telling us how much atmospheric mass a rocket needs to push against in order to accelerate.

Rockets can just as easily use solid objects as the reaction mass and work just fine.

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

^This last one's a beauty!
Yes, because it shows that your claim that rocket engines work by pressure pushing against atmospheric mass is utter nonsense.

you are the one who is claiming that a rocket must push against the mass of the atmosphere but refuse to explain how much atmospheric mass your rocket engine must push against.

Coke bottle  (one object) water (one object) how does the coke bottle lift off the ground?

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

This is totally correct. You don't need pressure at all. Just ejecting any object with mass out the back will work. It just happens to be easiest to do it with pressurised exhaust gases.

What do you think would happen if Satan was in space and threw a medicine ball half of his mass?

a rocket does not have arms that throw gas into space.

I agree it's not a direct comparison.

Just for the record i think markjo is a fair and reasonable mod.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Symptom on May 18, 2016, 09:55:22 PM
I am Papa. I quote shit. Woohooooo!
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 18, 2016, 10:20:19 PM
I am Papa. I quote shit.

That is exactly what I am doing.

Thank you for noticing.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Stanton on May 18, 2016, 11:01:17 PM
About time for the orderlies to tighten the straps
on Papa's straight jacket and medicate him for night storage.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: markjo on May 19, 2016, 05:23:16 AM

Just pointing out facts, markjo.

Everybody. Hates. YOU.



I don't hate him.

Just for the record i think markjo is a fair and reasonable mod. The fact he didn't ban Papa for his recent threads shows this.
Actually, I'm a former mod.  For some odd reason or other, the administration felt that it was no longer appropriate for a round earther to moderate the Flat Earth Society forums.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 19, 2016, 09:59:04 AM
Where's Wally, markjo?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Blue_Moon on May 19, 2016, 03:42:48 PM
Where's Wally, markjo?
Uh-oh!  Legba is having another brain stutter!  His mind gets stuck on the same phrase all day, and that's all he can post. 
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 19, 2016, 09:29:58 PM
Markjo knows what I'm talking about.

You all probably do...

Now; where's Wally?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 19, 2016, 11:52:01 PM
You are ignoring this user.

Are we really still here...
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 20, 2016, 10:13:31 AM
What part of F=pa says anything about Mass. markjo?

Where's Wally?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: sokarul on May 20, 2016, 10:18:57 AM
Object B is the exhaust.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 20, 2016, 10:22:00 AM
Incorrect.

What part of F=pa says anything about Mass. markjo?

Where's Wally?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: MrDebunk on May 20, 2016, 04:42:56 PM
Incorrect.

What part of F=pa says anything about Mass. markjo?

Where's Wally?

The correct equation is f=ma.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: rabinoz on May 20, 2016, 05:08:29 PM
Incorrect.

What part of F=pa says anything about Mass. markjo?

Where's Wally?

The correct equation is f=ma.

Don't confuse the poor fellow!
I don't think Poppy Leghorn realises that:
"a" is the accepted symbol for "acceleration", while the accepted symbol for "area" is "A".
"p" is the accepted symbol for "momentum", while the accepted symbol for "pressure" is "P", though "p" is used!

He can't keep all those little things in that tiny brain and still have room to remeber where he kept all those invectives he needs for his "copy-and-pastes"!
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Stanton on May 20, 2016, 05:32:53 PM
F=pa

pa is short for Papa

Use your imagination for F
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: JerkFace on May 20, 2016, 08:16:43 PM
F=pa

pa is short for Papa

Use your imagination for F

Yep,  that's about right.  :)

He wrote it incorrectly as Rabinoz pointed out it should have been written  F=PA,    but  please don't tell him that  forces and acceleration are vectors..    a vector can't be the product of two scalars.   It should be written  |F|=PA

The correct equation for Satan on a skate board is

 (https://upload.wikimedia.org/math/b/d/6/bd6577abc12a554a6142d16950ac5fb2.png)

Conservation of momentum..   derivation is here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsiolkovsky_rocket_equation#Derivation
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 20, 2016, 10:19:25 PM
As everything you say is a lie, I'm gonna just keep leaving your gibberish without comment, for intelligent people to be appalled by:

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

F=ma is F=ma; how does 'context' change the fact that you ended up saying that non-zero F can be created when m=0?
Then you shouldn't have any trouble telling us how much atmospheric mass a rocket needs to push against in order to accelerate.

Rockets can just as easily use solid objects as the reaction mass and work just fine.

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

^This last one's a beauty!
Yes, because it shows that your claim that rocket engines work by pressure pushing against atmospheric mass is utter nonsense.

you are the one who is claiming that a rocket must push against the mass of the atmosphere but refuse to explain how much atmospheric mass your rocket engine must push against.

Coke bottle  (one object) water (one object) how does the coke bottle lift off the ground?

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

This is totally correct. You don't need pressure at all. Just ejecting any object with mass out the back will work. It just happens to be easiest to do it with pressurised exhaust gases.

What do you think would happen if Satan was in space and threw a medicine ball half of his mass?

a rocket does not have arms that throw gas into space.

I agree it's not a direct comparison.

Just for the record i think markjo is a fair and reasonable mod.

The correct equation is f=ma.

The correct equation for Satan on a skate board is

 (https://upload.wikimedia.org/math/b/d/6/bd6577abc12a554a6142d16950ac5fb2.png)

Conservation of momentum..   derivation is here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsiolkovsky_rocket_equation#Derivation


Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Stanton on May 20, 2016, 10:33:53 PM
As everything you say is a lie, I'm gonna just keep leaving your gibberish without comment, for intelligent people to be appalled by:

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

F=ma is F=ma; how does 'context' change the fact that you ended up saying that non-zero F can be created when m=0?
Then you shouldn't have any trouble telling us how much atmospheric mass a rocket needs to push against in order to accelerate.

Rockets can just as easily use solid objects as the reaction mass and work just fine.

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

^This last one's a beauty!
Yes, because it shows that your claim that rocket engines work by pressure pushing against atmospheric mass is utter nonsense.

you are the one who is claiming that a rocket must push against the mass of the atmosphere but refuse to explain how much atmospheric mass your rocket engine must push against.

Coke bottle  (one object) water (one object) how does the coke bottle lift off the ground?

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

This is totally correct. You don't need pressure at all. Just ejecting any object with mass out the back will work. It just happens to be easiest to do it with pressurised exhaust gases.

What do you think would happen if Satan was in space and threw a medicine ball half of his mass?

a rocket does not have arms that throw gas into space.

I agree it's not a direct comparison.

Just for the record i think markjo is a fair and reasonable mod.

The correct equation is f=ma.

The correct equation for Satan on a skate board is

 (https://upload.wikimedia.org/math/b/d/6/bd6577abc12a554a6142d16950ac5fb2.png)

Conservation of momentum..   derivation is here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsiolkovsky_rocket_equation#Derivation






You put a lot of effort into being stupid.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 20, 2016, 10:37:27 PM
You put a lot of effort into not understanding how a rocket works.

Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 20, 2016, 10:47:15 PM
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=66748.90 (https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=66748.90)

Twenty eight to two now is it? That's awfully one sided, personally I'd be thinking maybe I'm the one who doesn't understand how rockets work.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 20, 2016, 10:53:02 PM
So twenty-eight assorted autists & sock-puppets don't understand N3?

Big deal.

Nice try with the peer-pressure bullshit though, sperg-lord.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Stanton on May 20, 2016, 11:17:42 PM
You put a lot of effort into not understanding how a rocket works.


I'll give you a high 5 for tenacity.

(thanks for not calling me a penguin.)
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 21, 2016, 12:09:46 AM
What, for tenaciously understanding how a rocket works?

Cool.

Do you like cats?
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Stanton on May 21, 2016, 12:27:07 AM

Do you like cats?



I think cats are one step below rodents.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: MrDebunk on May 21, 2016, 12:44:00 AM
What, for tenaciously understanding how a rocket works?

Cool.

Do you like cats?

A propeller engine uses air to propel itself. A rocket engine uses its own exhaust to propel itself. The two are very different. Get over with it. Grab a model rocket, find a vacuum chamber, put it in it, and fire it. If it works, then rockets work in a vacuum.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 21, 2016, 12:50:56 AM
I think cats are one step below rodents.

Interesting.

Describe in single words. Only the good things that come to your mind. About your mother.

A rocket engine uses its own exhaust to propel itself.

Thank you; that will go in my 'stupid Clown quotes' collection as soon as I am finished interrogating 'Stanton'.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Stanton on May 21, 2016, 01:10:34 AM

Interesting.

Describe in single words. Only the good things that come to your mind. About your mother.



What else did your psychiatrist ask you?





. . . as soon as I am finished interrogating 'Stanton'.



HaHaHaHA ... You are delusional.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 21, 2016, 01:19:23 AM
Running away from the Vought-Kampff test, eh?

Interesting.

Back to this:

As everything you say is a lie, I'm gonna just keep leaving your gibberish without comment, for intelligent people to be appalled by:

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

F=ma is F=ma; how does 'context' change the fact that you ended up saying that non-zero F can be created when m=0?
Then you shouldn't have any trouble telling us how much atmospheric mass a rocket needs to push against in order to accelerate.

Rockets can just as easily use solid objects as the reaction mass and work just fine.

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

^This last one's a beauty!
Yes, because it shows that your claim that rocket engines work by pressure pushing against atmospheric mass is utter nonsense.

you are the one who is claiming that a rocket must push against the mass of the atmosphere but refuse to explain how much atmospheric mass your rocket engine must push against.

Coke bottle  (one object) water (one object) how does the coke bottle lift off the ground?

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

This is totally correct. You don't need pressure at all. Just ejecting any object with mass out the back will work. It just happens to be easiest to do it with pressurised exhaust gases.

What do you think would happen if Satan was in space and threw a medicine ball half of his mass?

a rocket does not have arms that throw gas into space.

I agree it's not a direct comparison.

Just for the record i think markjo is a fair and reasonable mod.

The correct equation is f=ma.

The correct equation for Satan on a skate board is

 (https://upload.wikimedia.org/math/b/d/6/bd6577abc12a554a6142d16950ac5fb2.png)

Conservation of momentum..   derivation is here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsiolkovsky_rocket_equation#Derivation

I think cats are one step below rodents.

A rocket engine uses its own exhaust to propel itself.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: disputeone on May 21, 2016, 01:31:02 AM
It's funny how you're quoting a while bunch of intelligent people who are laughing at you.

Kinda ironic actually.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: Papa Legba on May 21, 2016, 01:33:54 AM
Thank you; another good one.

As everything you say is a lie, I'm gonna just keep leaving your gibberish without comment, for intelligent people to be appalled by:

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

F=ma is F=ma; how does 'context' change the fact that you ended up saying that non-zero F can be created when m=0?
Then you shouldn't have any trouble telling us how much atmospheric mass a rocket needs to push against in order to accelerate.

Rockets can just as easily use solid objects as the reaction mass and work just fine.

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

^This last one's a beauty!
Yes, because it shows that your claim that rocket engines work by pressure pushing against atmospheric mass is utter nonsense.

you are the one who is claiming that a rocket must push against the mass of the atmosphere but refuse to explain how much atmospheric mass your rocket engine must push against.

Coke bottle  (one object) water (one object) how does the coke bottle lift off the ground?

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

This is totally correct. You don't need pressure at all. Just ejecting any object with mass out the back will work. It just happens to be easiest to do it with pressurised exhaust gases.

What do you think would happen if Satan was in space and threw a medicine ball half of his mass?

a rocket does not have arms that throw gas into space.

I agree it's not a direct comparison.

Just for the record i think markjo is a fair and reasonable mod.

The correct equation is f=ma.

The correct equation for Satan on a skate board is

 (https://upload.wikimedia.org/math/b/d/6/bd6577abc12a554a6142d16950ac5fb2.png)

Conservation of momentum..   derivation is here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsiolkovsky_rocket_equation#Derivation

I think cats are one step below rodents.

A rocket engine uses its own exhaust to propel itself.

It's funny how you're quoting a while bunch of intelligent people who are laughing at you.
Title: Re: Satan on a Skateboard.
Post by: sokarul on May 21, 2016, 06:45:39 AM
 "Atoms don't exist."