The Flat Earth Society
Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth General => Topic started by: Thork on May 25, 2013, 04:42:50 AM
-
I have a few questions about the lizardmen that John Davis so fervently denies the existence of.
1) If not lizardmen, who exactly is hiding the shape of the earth from us?
2) If lizardmen don't exist, why the deliberate and unprompted thread denying all existence? It seems very orchestrated.
3) Why are the flat earth society suppressing information about the lizardmen?
4) Why do lizardmen not appear in the FAQ, earth not a globe and the site wiki when
The lizard conspiracy is central to flat earth theory.
5) Why is such a central theory completely swept under the carpet by the flat earth society?
6) Can we assume that John Davis speaks on behalf of the entire society? Will Lord Wilmore personally endorse John Davis' lizardman stance or like the rest of us, dismiss him as a boring drunkard with a history of substance abuse and psychotic episodes?
-
Does this have any relevance or should I move it to the "Complete Nonsense" section?
Oh wait that is your job.
-
Does this have any relevance or should I move it to the "Complete Nonsense" section?
Oh wait that is your job.
You are just as powerful as he is.
-
Does this have any relevance or should I move it to the "Complete Nonsense" section?
Oh wait that is your job.
It is not my 'job'.
Apparently
The lizard conspiracy is central to flat earth theory.
I'm still waiting for clarification on how exactly. All I do know is that lizardmen threads belong in the upper forums. John Davis has been extremely clear about this.
Does this have any relevance or should I move it to the "Complete Nonsense" section?
Oh wait that is your job.
You are just as powerful as he is.
Steady. We all know that's not true.
-
I have a few questions about the lizardmen that John Davis so fervently denies the existence of.
1) If not lizardmen, who exactly is hiding the shape of the earth from us?
Ourselves. Or no one.
2) If lizardmen don't exist, why the deliberate and unprompted thread denying all existence? It seems very orchestrated.
Why not? A great deal of people seem to be confused on the issue. I have even heard of links between fae mythologies of Europe and Lizardmen. Some even think they are greys! I think these are all lovely ideas, however I felt it necessary to note the unlikely probability that 50ish% of the populous would inherit more from their lizard ancestry than their human in relation to certain actions, thought patterns, etc. This difference could not possible create a slave class unaware of their state.
3) Why are the flat earth society suppressing information about the lizardmen?
As far as I know, we are not.
4) Why do lizardmen not appear in the FAQ, earth not a globe and the site wiki when [they are such a central part]
5) Why is such a central theory completely swept under the carpet by the flat earth society?
I could ask you the very same thing, being the former resident sweeper in these parts. However, it was due to confusion oft had between a parody site and this site.
6) Can we assume that John Davis speaks on behalf of the entire society? Will Lord Wilmore personally endorse John Davis' lizardman stance or like the rest of us, dismiss him as a boring drunkard with a history of substance abuse and psychotic episodes?
My stance that the world isn't run by a 50% majority of lizard people?
-
Is it possible the Willmore is a lizard person and if so, many many others of the FES leadership are lizards?
-
A lizard man should be identifiable by a few simple clues. Likely a lack of shame or guilt would be present, liars by nature with an almost complete lack of appreciation towards matters of love. Intense lack of will to apologize or be shown to be as "incorrect" would also be likely. Likely unwilling to confront the nature when confronted with this truth some might even rewrite their own memory to exalt these beasts. Perhaps issues identifying sarcasm, double speak, or abstraction, however perhaps thats why some would say they made hybrids to begin with.
Consider the dominance driven reptilian brain. I would say it would be a stretch to claim Wilmore has acted upon reptilian tendencies or is some secret lizard man. But then again, who among us haven't?
It seems silly to discuss such matters anyways. I have already conclusively shown it to impossible!
-
A lizard man should be identifiable by a few simple clues. Likely a lack of shame or guilt would be present, liars by nature with an almost complete lack of appreciation towards matters of love. Intense lack of will to apologize or be shown to be as "incorrect" would also be likely. Likely unwilling to confront the nature when confronted with this truth some might even rewrite their own memory to exalt these beasts. Perhaps issues identifying sarcasm, double speak, or abstraction, however perhaps thats why some would say they made hybrids to begin with.
You realize that covers a good chunk of the members on both sides here, don't you?
-
According to John, pretty much every regular of FES is, in fact, a lizard.
-
A lizard man should be identifiable by a few simple clues. Likely a lack of shame or guilt would be present, liars by nature with an almost complete lack of appreciation towards matters of love. Intense lack of will to apologize or be shown to be as "incorrect" would also be likely. Likely unwilling to confront the nature when confronted with this truth some might even rewrite their own memory to exalt these beasts. Perhaps issues identifying sarcasm, double speak, or abstraction, however perhaps thats why some would say they made hybrids to begin with.
You realize that covers a good chunk of the members on both sides here, don't you?
I'm sure it does. Well, it seems that if such a large percent of people here are capable of lying, a position I thought was impossible, I have no grounds to my previous claim that it was indeed impossible that a conspiracy could consist of 50% of the world. I think if anything this shows it is possible that if it was advantageous enough to a small or large group to control another subset of man through some lever, that small or large group could make it happen. Especially given that people see what they want to and would purposefully ignore any such conspiracy or label it as "wacky."
Either that or a large part of regulars in FES are, in fact, lizards dominated by dominance and power struggles, and petty fights. If a bird is a dinosaur, man is certainly at least a hybrid lizard. What then of those who rely heaviest on these genes of dominance and brut -- those who reject the abstract? Where should this line be drawn? Is it any different to call them lizards, or sociopaths, or devils, or fae, or beasts? Does name alone matter?
-
But the real question, if Willmore is a lizard, how do we know, and what actions can we take?
-
I'm sure it does. Well, it seems that if such a large percent of people here are capable of lying, a position I thought was impossible, I have no grounds to my previous claim that it was indeed impossible that a conspiracy could consist of 50% of the world. I think if anything this shows it is possible that if it was advantageous enough to a small or large group to control another subset of man through some lever, that small or large group could make it happen. Especially given that people see what they want to and would purposefully ignore any such conspiracy or label it as "wacky."
Either that or a large part of regulars in FES are, in fact, lizards dominated by dominance and power struggles, and petty fights. If a bird is a dinosaur, man is certainly at least a hybrid lizard. What then of those who rely heaviest on these genes of dominance and brut -- those who reject the abstract? Where should this line be drawn? Is it any different to call them lizards, or sociopaths, or devils, or fae, or beasts? Does name alone matter?
Everyone is always so worried about lizards and devils, but never about the dragons. Sneaky, sneaky dragons.
-
Dragons are most likely included as lizards. Or reptiles, at least.
-
If we are to believe dinosaurs ruled the Earth, and even built boats when humans where just scurrying rodents then me must assume the reptilian race upon as is superior. Even in Genesis a snake outwitted humans.
What hope does the human race have?
-
For the record, I am not a lizard, nor am I of reptilian ancestry (to the best of my knowledge).
-
If we are to believe dinosaurs ruled the Earth, and even built boats when humans where just scurrying rodents then me must assume the reptilian race upon as is superior. Even in Genesis a snake outwitted humans.
What hope does the human race have?
Jesus is your only hope.
-
For the record, I am not a lizard, nor am I of reptilian ancestry (to the best of my knowledge).
But how do you know this and what proof do you present?
-
For the record, I am not a lizard, nor am I of reptilian ancestry (to the best of my knowledge).
To the best of your knowledge? Isn't there any way you can tell?
-
Possibly, but if so, it is currently beyond my knowledge.
-
If we are to believe dinosaurs ruled the Earth, and even built boats when humans where just scurrying rodents then me must assume the reptilian race upon as is superior. Even in Genesis a snake outwitted humans.
What hope does the human race have?
Jesus is your only hope.
-
If we are to believe dinosaurs ruled the Earth, and even built boats when humans where just scurrying rodents then me must assume the reptilian race upon as is superior. Even in Genesis a snake outwitted humans.
What hope does the human race have?
Jesus is your only hope.
I agree hoppy, but our FE leaders are passionate antichrists, and probable lizard men. What must we do to create a FES based on Christian fundamentals?
-
For the record, I am not a lizard, nor am I of reptilian ancestry (to the best of my knowledge).
But it's well known that lizards are notorious liars, so of course you would deny your reptilian ancestry.
-
For the record, I am not a lizard, nor am I of reptilian ancestry (to the best of my knowledge).
But it's well known that lizards are notorious liars, so of course you would deny your reptilian ancestry.
Are the lizard men the origin of the liar's paradox?
-
For the record, I am not a lizard, nor am I of reptilian ancestry (to the best of my knowledge).
But it's well known that lizards are notorious liars, so of course you would deny your reptilian ancestry.
Are the lizard men the origin of the liar's paradox?
I doubt it. They don't need to lie about everything, just their identities and missions.
-
Reptilians? Just when I thought you guys couldn't be any more crazy, you prove me wrong.
This is what I'm hearing from you guys - (http://)
Think I'll just walk away from you crazies now....