What spurred me to ask is that when .net went down, the vast majority of his content (linked earlier in this thread) was no longer accessible. It would be a real shame to lose any of it, so I'd like to see it here as well.I keep daily local backup sof all .net data. It will never be gone for good.
What spurred me to ask is that when .net went down, the vast majority of his content (linked earlier in this thread) was no longer accessible. It would be a real shame to lose any of it, so I'd like to see it here as well.I keep daily local backup sof all .net data. It will never be gone for good.
No Cathedrals are ancient; they are from the early part of the modern period, such as 1400.
Is sacred cubit and amah interchangeable? Sofer also mentions an equal measurement of 1 amah as being 24 zoll.
Now, both ua acceleration and the infinite earth conjectures were created in order to explain terrestrial/planetary gravitation/gravity on a flat earth; and both fail miserably to address even this single issue.
I have posted countless times already the direct quotes from I. Newton specifying the fact that he believed that there are two DIFFERENT gravitational forces: one of a rotational type, responsible for planetary/stellar orbits, and the other responsible for the terrestrial gravitation phenomenon.
I have posted, also, the direct arguments relating to the perturbation of planetary orbits, impossibility of the existence of a field of gravitons which would allow a Sun - Planet - Satellite system to function, and much more; the gravitational force responsible for planetary/stellar orbits is of a ROTATIONAL TYPE, completely different than the terrestrial gravitation encoutered here, on the flat earth.
I have also demonstrated directly and very clearly that there is no attractive gravity; we have PUSHING gravity, caused by the pressure of the terrestrial/telluric currents. And there must be a shield/barrier of energy (call it the Schumann Cavity) between the two types of gravitational phenomena just described.
Both infinite earth/ua acceleration are armchair, fictitious hypotheses which do not answer the most basic questions when it comes to the gravitational anomalies known to exist over the surface of the earth/oceans (an issue I have presented here frequently).
you should stop the printing press on your book; you should let me write the chapters on gravity/ether, maybe then you will sell more than 2 copies...
You will find an excelent introduction to torsion physics (Kozyrev/DePalma) and much more in chapter 2 (Hyperdimensional Physics) of Dark Mission by R. Hoagland:I used to have a wonderful collection of essays concerning Shamans worldview and their intrinsically flat earth nature. I'll see if I can find out the title as I think it may have some relevant information.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/36392975/Hoagland-amp-Bara-Dark-Mission-The-Secret-History-of-NASA-2007
And, in chapter 5, you will find the perfect reason (a point which has not been observed by any other author until now) why the Nasa Apollo missions COULD NOT have taken place at all.
http://divinecosmos.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=95&Itemid=36 (Kozyrev/DePalma torsion physics experiments)
What is time?
A. Kozyrev time theory:
http://www.univer.omsk.su/omsk/Sci/Kozyrev/paper1a.txt
http://www.chronos.msu.ru/RREPORTS/kozyrev_100/johansen_basic.pdf
Kozyrev - Barbour theory, Non-uniform time:
http://physicoschronos.org/pdf/poliakov.pdf
Julian Barbour - End of Time - Nows, time capsules
http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/barbour/barbour_p1.html (10 pages)
http://www.acampbell.ukfsn.org/bookreviews/r/barbour.html
Julian Barbour - Killing Time documentary:
Absolute or Relative Motion? J. Barbour:
http://books.google.ro/books?id=ekA9AAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=julian+barbour+absolute&hl=ro&ei=LaN_TPurC47KswaN39H_Dw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCcQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false
End of Time/ J. Barbour:
http://books.google.ro/books?id=TpzEqWEGYoMC&printsec=frontcover&dq=julian+barbour+end+of+time&hl=ro&ei=naN_TOWhLY3CswblovTkDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false
Space-Time continuum hoax:
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=39372.msg982142#msg982142
Flat Earth Universe in the vision of the shamans of the Amazon:
(http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/3218/incatreeoflife.jpg)
Your forum, the .net website, includes many other valuable discussions, in addition to some of my messages...many topics which actually were discussed in more details than it was done here.It was never my intention to remove the site completely and will have the forums up for archive purposes. I humbly apologize.
I feel it is of some relevance to the principles of Zeteticism and the ideals of our Society.
Hiroshima: Before and After
http://www.scribd.com/doc/78516104/Liberty-Forum (http://www.scribd.com/doc/78516104/Liberty-Forum)
During the period 2004-2006, on libertyforum.org (deleted from the internet), cactus/no name presented the most extraordinary facts pertaining to the fact that the "nuclear" explosion at Hiroshima was faked; I was able to save some of the pages.
Consider what a prism does:
http://www.educationalelectronicsusa.com/p/light-XV.htm (http://www.educationalelectronicsusa.com/p/light-XV.htm)Quote(http://www.educationalelectronicsusa.com/p/images/light-XVa.gif)
The splitting of a ray into its component colours is known as dispersion of light and the band of colours is known as a spectrum.
I'm not 100% sure of this, but I think this subject is not off-context. Then it should "fit" in Flat Earth General.
Ok, you all know that it is uncomfortable to express your opinions about earth's shape in our current society, where round earth is considered an absolute and unquestionable truth. I have did it in school, and that didn't went so well.
I'm in the first year of the High School, and here we are taught obviously that the world is round, this is a recurrent theme in Geography and Physics. But I will speak specifically about my discussions with my Physics teacher on earth's shape.
You know, we have to frequently "swallow" the idea that the earth is round and orbits the sun, as well that the sun is a star, space travel is possible, NASA doesn't lie etc. Some weeks ago, I was listening to these things told by my teacher and then I raised my hand and said: "Teacher, I know a group, a kind of organization, which believes that the earth is flat, and NASA fakes its images.". He answered: "Really? They're ignorant. It was proved that the earth is round. I can think about the possibility of geocentric models, maybe. But a flat earth is impossible."
If you are an FET believer, reply with your best arguments and I will attempt to refute them. If I cannot refute them, I will be forced to accept FET.
Well it certainly contradicts most FErs model of the solar system.
"The first successful measurement of c was made by Olaus Roemer in 1676. He noticed that, depending on the Earth–Sun–Jupiter geometry, there could be a difference of up to 1000 seconds between the predicted times of the eclipses of Jupiter's moons, and the actual times that these eclipses were observed. He correctly surmised that this is due to the varying length of time it takes for light to travel from Jupiter to Earth as the distance between these two planets varies. He obtained a value of c equivalent to 214,000 km/s, which was very approximate because planetary distances were not accurately known at that time."
It's the 306th anniversary of Leonhard Euler's birthday today. Not only my hero also my avatar. For those of a mathematical disposition who haven't heard of him google some of his work and boggle at his command of the subject. For those who think they have the ability to reinvent mathematics stay away from him: you're not fit to wipe his arse.
They never explain where this large amount of gravity comes from? ???
Force experienced by a 1 kilogram object on the surface of the earth is governed by: F = GMm/r^2
F = (6.67x10^-11 x 1 x 5.972E24)/ (6,371x10^3)^2
F = 9.8136N
The large amount of gravity comes from the massive rock underneath you.
Ovid, Metamorphoses (transl. F. J. Miller), Book II:
"The chariot of the sun, driven by Phaethon, moved "no longer in the same
course as before." The horses "break loose from their course" and "rush aimlessly, knocking
against the stars set deep in the sky and snatching the chariot along through uncharted ways."
The constellations of the cold Bears tried to plunge into the forbidden sea, and the sun's chariot
roamed through unknown regions of the air. It was "borne along just as a ship driven before the
headlong blast, whose pilot has let the useless rudder go and abandoned the ship to the gods and
prayers."
"The earth bursts into flame, the highest parts first, and splits into deep cracks, and its moisture is
all dried up. The meadows are burned to white ashes; the trees are consumed, green leaves and
all, and the ripe grain furnishes fuel for its own destruction. . . . Great cities perish with their
walls, and the vast conflagration reduces whole nations to ashes."
"The woods are ablaze with the mountains. . . . Aetna is blazing boundlessly . . . and twin-peaked Parnassus. . . . Nor does its chilling clime save Scythia; Caucasus burns . . . and the heaven-piercing Alps and cloud-capped Apennines."
The scorched clouds belched forth smoke. Phaethon sees the earth aflame. "He can no longer
bear the ashes and whirling sparks, and is completely shrouded in the dense, hot smoke. In this
pitchy darkness he cannot tell where he is or whither he is going." "It was then, as men think, that the peoples of Aethiopia became black-skinned, since the blood was drawn to the surface of their bodies by the heat."
"Then also Libya became a desert, for the heat dried up her moisture. . . . The Don's waters
steam; Babylonian Euphrates burns; the Ganges, Phasis, Danube, Alpheus boil; Spercheos' banks
are aflame. The golden sands of Tagus melt in the intense heat, and the swans . . . are scorched. .
. . The Nile fled in terror to the ends of the earth . . . the seven mouths lie empty, filled with dust;
seven broad channels, all without a stream. The same mischance dries up the Thracian rivers,
Hebrus and Strymon; also the rivers of the west, the Rhine, Rhone, Po and the Tiber. . . . Great
cracks yawn everywhere. . . . Even the sea shrinks up, and what was but now a great watery
expanse is a dry plain of sand. The mountains, which the deep sea had covered before, spring
forth, and increase the numbers of the scattered Cyclades."
A well-known student of S. Freud and roommate of A. Einstein at Princeton had the following comments:
How could the poet have known that a change in the movement of the sun across the firmament
must cause a world conflagration, blazing of volcanoes, boiling of rivers, disappearance of seas,
birth of deserts, emergence of islands, if the sun never changed its harmonious journey from
sunrise to sunset?
How the Roman poet Ovid could have known of the relation between the interrupted movement of the sun and a world fire unless such a catastrophe had really occurred?
Now we know that the “ancient” Greek, Roman, Egyptian, Mayan, Babylonian bibliographical sources were all forgeries of the 18th Century, as demonstrated with ample proofs here in the new radical chronology subject.
The only sources we can trust for a description of past planetary collisions (FE theory) in Worlds in Collision are as follows: Polynesia, Maoris of New Zealand, Samoan tribes, Tahiti, Hawaii, Loanga, Kanga, Wanyoro tribes in Africa, Oraibi, Kaska, Choctaw and Pawnee tribes in North America, Lapland tribes.
http://web.archive.org/web/20120913084341/http://openeye.99k.org/Books/Worlds%20In%20Collision.pdf (http://web.archive.org/web/20120913084341/http://openeye.99k.org/Books/Worlds%20In%20Collision.pdf)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/21746049/Velikovsky-Worlds-in-Collision# (http://www.scribd.com/doc/21746049/Velikovsky-Worlds-in-Collision#)
Their description matches exactly that narrated by "Ovid", which means that the authors of the Metamorphoses were actual witnesses to some of these cosmic catastrophes.
The first great cataclysm occurred some 50 years before the Flood, when the first solar and lunar eclipses occurred.
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php/topic,30499.msg1488602.html#msg1488602 (http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php/topic,30499.msg1488602.html#msg1488602)
The second cataclysm happened very close to the year 1700 AD (official chronological dating): the great Flood/Deluge, when the extraordinary underground cities of Anatolia were built:
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php/topic,30499.msg1488591.html#msg1488591 (http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php/topic,30499.msg1488591.html#msg1488591)
The remaining two major cosmic catastrophes occurred during the exodus of Seth (Kush) to the Sinai Peninsula and the exodus of Akhenaton (son of Nimrod) to the same region near Egypt a few decades later (1750 AD).
Therefore, the truncated Maxwell equations refer ONLY to the temporary hertzian ripples in the ether sea, and NOT to the scalar/ether waves themselves:
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php/topic,58190.msg1489693.html#msg1489693 (http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php/topic,58190.msg1489693.html#msg1489693)
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php/topic,58190.msg1489785.html#msg1489785 (http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php/topic,58190.msg1489785.html#msg1489785)
Now, a closed-form formula for the natural logarithm:
LN v = ((-2 +{2+[2+...(2+ 1/v + v)^1/2]^1/2}^1/2))^1/2 x 2^n
n+1 parantheses to evaluate - in the last parenthesis we substract 2 and take the square root one last time (n+1), before we multiply the result by 2^n
For v very large, we can omit the term 1/v
By summing the nested square root function, we obtain the final result:
LN v = 2n x ( v(1/2^n) - 2 + v-(2^-n) )1/2
Of course, we can use the first formula for computation utilizing only a pocket calculator with only the four basic arithmetic operations (since a square root function is essentially a continued fraction).
And there are more formulas to be derived from the logarithm continued function:
COS @ = 1/2 X (({[(2 - @^2/2^n)^2 -2)^2...]-2}^2 -2)) (n/2+1 evaluations)
COS^-1 @ = ((2- {2+ [2+ (2+ 2@)^1/2]...^1/2}))^1/2 x 2^n (n+1 evaluations)
COSH v = 1/2 x (({[( ( (2 + v2/2^n)^2) -2)^2] -2)^2 ...-2}^2 -2)) (n/2 +1 evaluations)
TAN-1 v = ((2- {2+ [2+ (2+ 2{1/(1+ v2)1/2})^1/2]...^1/2}))^1/2 x 2^n (n+1 evaluations)