The Flat Earth Society

Other Discussion Boards => The Lounge => Topic started by: 17 November on April 13, 2008, 08:26:04 AM

Title: Projected Election Results
Post by: 17 November on April 13, 2008, 08:26:04 AM
My Projected Scenario:  "With 9 out of 9 Supreme Court Justices reporting, we can project the winner of the fixed election as the phony conservative over the Uncle Tom who beat the phony (gay) woman."

This poll is for who you think will win -

- not who you want to win.
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Mr. Ireland on April 13, 2008, 01:28:01 PM
Tom Bishop.
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Masterchef on April 13, 2008, 01:49:45 PM
Why the fuck would you even bother putting Ron Paul in the poll?
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Anteater7171 on April 13, 2008, 08:46:38 PM
Because Ron Paul is the man!!! He is by far the best canidate, excluding Tom Bishop. Unlike Obama/Hilary who simply preach change, he acctualy has plans to do so.
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Trekky0623 on April 13, 2008, 08:50:05 PM
He dropped out of the Republican campaign, though.
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: EvilToothpaste on April 13, 2008, 09:10:24 PM
Yeah, but if we all vote for him then he's in like Flynn. 
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: EvilToothpaste on April 13, 2008, 09:21:53 PM
I hate everyone. 
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: cmdshft on April 13, 2008, 09:27:48 PM
Quote from: EvilToothpaste on April 13, 2008, 09:21:53 PM
I hate everyone. 

I hate you too. </3
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: EvilToothpaste on April 13, 2008, 09:34:40 PM
Ow, my feelers! 

Don't worry, Hara ... I don't hate everyone equally. 
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: cmdshft on April 13, 2008, 10:16:24 PM
Quote from: EvilToothpaste on April 13, 2008, 09:34:40 PM
Ow, my feelers! 

Don't worry, Hara ... I don't hate everyone equally. 

That could very well mean you hate me most. If so, I've done my job, but even if you hate me least, I still did my job. Either way, I win.
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Mrs. Peach on April 13, 2008, 10:30:22 PM
Quote from: EvilToothpaste on April 13, 2008, 09:21:53 PM
I hate everyone. 

 ;D  I find I can hate much better if I just hate a few at a time (usually anyone in authority).
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: magic on April 14, 2008, 03:02:25 PM
Ron Paul.
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Agent_0042 on April 14, 2008, 03:59:19 PM
Nader doesn't get his own option?  :'(
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Guessed on April 14, 2008, 04:13:30 PM
Quote from: Agent_0042 on April 14, 2008, 03:59:19 PM
Nader doesn't get his own option?  :'(

Nader ftw...well not ftw but a little better each time
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Roundy the Truthinessist on April 14, 2008, 04:33:43 PM
Nader for the Republicans
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Anteater7171 on April 14, 2008, 05:09:24 PM
Quote from: Trekky0623 on April 13, 2008, 08:50:05 PM
He dropped out of the Republican campaign, though.

You can still vote for him in other primarys. I think he won as a Libertarian.
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Dioptimus Drime on April 14, 2008, 08:41:20 PM
What four fucking imbeciles voted for Ron Paul.

a) He's not going to win. He never was going to win. It's not gonna happen.
b) He's a senile old man. He has no idea how to run a campaign or a country, his social skills are limited to ranting on all of his "ideas" which are sometimes cool, but usually really dumb.

I liked him at first, too, so I'll admit that the fanboy attire of shouting "RON PAUL FTW" caught on in my head as well, but if you look at who he actually is, you'll realize he's pretty much a moron. If you wanted to vote for somebody who wasn't going to win, you should've gone with Gravel.

In summary, go home, grandpa, you've had your share of fun this campaign.


But honestly, Obama's going to win. If not, I'm going to kill myself. Or move to somewhere far away from the U.S. Far, far away.

~D-Draw
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Roundy the Truthinessist on April 14, 2008, 10:07:38 PM
It's impossible to predict who will win.  Such speculation is futile.
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Althalus on April 14, 2008, 10:44:13 PM
(http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/b/bb/Ronpaul2008.jpg)
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: narcberry on April 15, 2008, 12:20:27 AM
Caring about any of your political opinions was a mistake I might have made.
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Chris Spaghetti on April 16, 2008, 01:08:54 AM
If the yanks re-elect the Republicans I'm taking a year off work to bitch-slap each and every one of you
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Roundy the Truthinessist on April 16, 2008, 09:39:01 AM
Quote from: Chris Spaghetti on April 16, 2008, 01:08:54 AM
If the yanks re-elect the Republicans I'm taking a year off work to bitch-slap each and every one of you

Normally I'd agree but McCain is so moderate that he's practically a Democrat himself.  I'm in an unusual position this year, I think I'd be satisfied no matter which of the three left ended up winning the election.  Of course when you've had someone like GW running things for eight years you're just ready for change, period.

If it had been McCain running against Gore in 2000 I would have voted for him in a heartbeat.  The only real thing going against McCain this year is his age but hey, I loved Reagan too.  ;D
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: divito the truthist on April 16, 2008, 10:29:46 AM
I'd personally like to see Clinton win. I think too many people are on the Barrack bandwagon instead of looking at the issues, but maybe not. There is no control group in this election, and it's hard to gauge what's really the motivating factor in it. It is race, sex, or issues? Oh well, I don't even live there, but they are all better than Bush.
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Rex on April 16, 2008, 04:17:55 PM
Who gets elected isn't really the issue. We all know it's the Democrats' turn to play now. The question is will the agenda change? Will the geopolitical situation improve significantly? My bet is Hillary will follow down the same path Bush did, perhaps with a bit more sugar on top.
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Roundy the Truthinessist on April 16, 2008, 04:28:52 PM
Quote from: Rex on April 16, 2008, 04:17:55 PM
Who gets elected isn't really the issue. We all know it's the Democrats' turn to play now. The question is will the agenda change? Will the geopolitical situation improve significantly? My bet is Hillary will follow down the same path Bush did, perhaps with a bit more sugar on top.

That wouldn't surprise me in the least, although I do think she would work to putting an end to this ridiculous war.
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Space Cowgirl on April 16, 2008, 05:56:29 PM
They're all the same.. I don't think it matters who wins.  I will be glad when Bush is out, he's a terrible leader.
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Dioptimus Drime on April 17, 2008, 09:22:47 AM
Really, though, stop voting for Ron Paul. It frightens me.


~D-Draw
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: EvilToothpaste on April 17, 2008, 09:28:20 AM
Insert vote for Ron Paul...


I hope not to get the FBI on my ass here, but I think this bigoted racist country is not ready for a female or a black president.  I'm not saying neither will be elected; it is very probable one of them will be in office.  All I'm saying is I hope they choose a really good vice-president. 
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Trekky0623 on April 25, 2008, 08:39:22 PM
Jon Stewart on Hilary Clinton (http://)
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: 17 November on April 29, 2008, 02:16:55 AM
Concerning the negative stigma some have applied lately to Obama, an association with the politics of Louis Farrakhan is a good thing.

The US dollar is on a crash course downwards with no signs of stopping save a completely new dollar - a new currency in which case probably all of the main three candidates would use as an opportunity to introduce a united North American currency to replace the US dollar - the AMERO.  This is something that Ron Paul would obviously oppose and which Bush, McCain and Clinton would endorse, but where would Obama stand with reguard to this?

The Late Great USA:  The Coming Merger With Mexico and Canada
By Jerome Corsi
http://shop.wnd.com/store/item.asp?ITEM_ID=2116
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: General Douchebag on April 29, 2008, 02:50:48 AM
Hilary Clinton's an idiot.
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: TheA1pha0mega on April 29, 2008, 07:35:52 AM
King Bishop wins my vote just for that comment.

 ;D
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: General Douchebag on April 29, 2008, 01:18:19 PM
Yay, I'm gonna beat McCain!
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Agent_0042 on April 29, 2008, 01:22:21 PM
Quote from: 17 November on April 29, 2008, 02:16:55 AM
Concerning the negative stigma some have applied lately to Obama, an association with the politics of Louis Farrakhan is a good thing.

The US dollar is on a crash course downwards with no signs of stopping save a completely new dollar - a new currency in which case probably all of the main three candidates would use as an opportunity to introduce a united North American currency to replace the US dollar - the AMERO.  This is something that Ron Paul would obviously oppose and which Bush, McCain and Clinton would endorse, but where would Obama stand with reguard to this?

The Late Great USA:  The Coming Merger With Mexico and Canada
By Jerome Corsi
http://shop.wnd.com/store/item.asp?ITEM_ID=2116
Fostering trade does not equal a merger. 5.5/10 for effort, and the thread is the only thing stopping the copypasta.
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Wakka Wakka on May 02, 2008, 11:21:19 PM
Whoever voted for Ron Paul is a complete idiot.  I'm not for the war in Iraq but I can't believe Ron Paul would vote against body armor for soldiers in Iraq!!  How is he not a Nazi?  Oh shit, he's my congressman too.  :'( :'(
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Anteater7171 on May 03, 2008, 12:19:25 AM
Quote
How is he not a Nazi?

He's a libertarian, not a fascist for one.
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Dioptimus Drime on May 03, 2008, 09:09:10 AM
Quote from: Anteater7171 on May 03, 2008, 12:19:25 AM
Quote
How is he not a Nazi?

He's a libertarian, not a fascist for one.

He's not a libertarian, he's a moron. You see, the subtle difference that you have to pick out is that libertarianism makes some semblance of common sense.


~D-Draw
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: General Douchebag on May 03, 2008, 09:15:54 AM
Does it? Capitalism makes sense, fascism makes sense, but just about everything left wing is insane.
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Dioptimus Drime on May 03, 2008, 09:20:35 AM
Quote from: iPot maker. on May 03, 2008, 09:15:54 AM
Does it? Capitalism makes sense, fascism makes sense, but just about everything left wing is insane.

Libertarianism is right wing. Hence why Ron Paul was running for Republican candidacy.

More importantly, libertarianism is pretty much the most straightforward you can get as far as political theory goes. It mixes capitalism, a free market, with social liberalism, a free society. It's fairly obvious.

~D-Draw
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: General Douchebag on May 03, 2008, 09:23:14 AM
I'm sorry for not keeping up with Ron Paul's political agenda. He's not going to win anyway, so why do you care?
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: cmdshft on May 03, 2008, 09:25:04 AM
RON PAUL fes
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: 17 November on May 11, 2008, 12:08:38 PM
Quote from: Agent_0042
Quote from: 17 November
Concerning the negative stigma some have applied lately to Obama, an association with the politics of Louis Farrakhan is a good thing.

The US dollar is on a crash course downwards with no signs of stopping save a completely new dollar - a new currency in which case probably all of the main three candidates would use as an opportunity to introduce a united North American currency to replace the US dollar - the AMERO.  This is something that Ron Paul would obviously oppose and which Bush, McCain and Clinton would endorse, but where would Obama stand with reguard to this?

The Late Great USA:  The Coming Merger With Mexico and Canada
By Jerome Corsi
http://shop.wnd.com/store/item.asp?ITEM_ID=2116
Fostering trade does not equal a merger.

No one ever claimed simple buying and selling meant political union, but when you aim to unite the monies of different countries into a single common currency, that most definitely spills over into politics.  This is not aimless babble - it just happened in Europe.  Southern European countries with weak currencies like the Greek drachma now have the same currency as Germany and France.  IF you don't believe stuff like NAFTA is intended to bring about the same thing between Mexico and the US and Canada, then you are ignoring reality.
Title: Re: Projected Election Results
Post by: Althalus on May 12, 2008, 04:31:27 AM
RaWn PaWl 4 LyFe!

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/04/09/house.olympics/index.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/05/AR2008050502314.html
http://www.shanktified.com/archives/ron-paul-campaign-on-evolution/
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=28341_Neo-Nazis_Say-_Ron_Paul_is_One_of_Us

(http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/5/56/Pimpingforpaul.jpg)

(http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/1/1b/Ron_paul_vagina.jpg)

(http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/4/46/RonPaul08.jpg)

(http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/3/3d/RonPaulsupporter.jpg)