The Flat Earth Society

Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth Debate => Topic started by: ﮎingulaЯiτy on March 28, 2007, 11:42:53 AM

Title: L0gic
Post by: ﮎingulaЯiτy on March 28, 2007, 11:42:53 AM
For the convenience of all who oppose me. The following need responses.  ;)

TO ALL
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=11998.msg167046#msg167046
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=11997.msg167045#msg167045

TO FRANC
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=11844.msg167065#msg167065
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=11937.msg167051#msg167051

TO THEENGINEER
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=11913.msg167054#msg167054
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=11483.msg167040#msg167040
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=11708.msg167044#msg167044

I think that's all of them. I suppose others can use this opportunity to bring up unanswered posts as well?
Title: Re: L0gic
Post by: CommonCents on March 28, 2007, 11:50:21 AM
Ramen's posts were good and I wouldn't be trying to get it read again if it was left at that, but Tom posted what propels the flat earth and gave my question validity again... http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=11977.0

And Ramen if Tom's post DOESN'T return validity to my question could you please explain why? Thanks!
Title: Re: L0gic
Post by: TheEngineer on March 28, 2007, 07:36:36 PM
I apologize for not being available 24/7 to answer your posts.  I do have other things to do, and it's been a busy week. 

To answer:
Thread 1:  See my reply.
Thread 2:  General Relativity.
Thread 3:  That's a statement, I didn't realize I had to respond.
Title: Re: L0gic
Post by: ﮎingulaЯiτy on March 30, 2007, 12:23:20 PM
Thread 3:  That's a statement, I didn't realize I had to respond.

I suppose you don't have to respond. You're welcome to though.  ;)

Narcberry should be the one defending himself after all.
Title: Re: L0gic
Post by: Midnight on March 30, 2007, 01:08:53 PM
This is gravy.
Title: Re: L0gic
Post by: TheEngineer on March 30, 2007, 01:29:26 PM
Thread 3:  That's a statement, I didn't realize I had to respond.

I suppose you don't have to respond. You're welcome to though.  ;)

I'm welcome for what?  You telling me something I already know?
Title: Re: L0gic
Post by: narcberry on April 03, 2007, 09:03:43 PM
Thread 3:  That's a statement, I didn't realize I had to respond.

I suppose you don't have to respond. You're welcome to though.  ;)

Narcberry should be the one defending himself after all.

I'd answer yours if you'd answer mine.