The Flat Earth Society
Other Discussion Boards => Technology, Science & Alt Science => Topic started by: Heiwa on May 15, 2022, 10:46:05 PM
-
Mr. E Musk, US owner of SpaceX, Tesla and Twitter companies, offers tourist trips to planet Mars on his spacecrafts. The one-way trip takes 200 days, so after take off Earth you have to spend 200 days in space looking out of a window, etc. After landing Mars you have to spend some time there to await the return trip, when Mars and Earth are suitably lined up. Then the return trip can start, which takes only 199 days as Sun gravity pulls you back. Musk has sold plenty trips so there is a waiting list.
-
Mr. E Musk, US owner of SpaceX, Tesla and Twitter companies, offers tourist trips to planet Mars on his spacecrafts. The one-way trip takes 200 days, so after take off Earth you have to spend 200 days in space looking out of a window, etc. After landing Mars you have to spend some time there to await the return trip, when Mars and Earth are suitably lined up. Then the return trip can start, which takes only 199 days as Sun gravity pulls you back. Musk has sold plenty trips so there is a waiting list.
Do you have a link to this plan from Elon?
I'm not sure people should trust Elon on the subject of anything these days. Elon only cares about Elon
Mars would be a one way trip. But even so, as evidenced by the hoax 'Mars One' project, there are no shortage of twerps who would rush for the suicide mission. Actually, calling it a 'mission' is generous. Without any infrastructure or materials that have already been dropped off ahead of humans arrival, you will last until your oxygen supply runs out.
Also, why would anyone go colonise a planet where Elon memed and sold T-shirts of 'Nuke Mars'. - Without understanding how ridiculous than plan was even in the context of starting a greenhouse effect and melting the ice caps. (you would need about 3500 nukes every day for 7 weeks LOL). Not only that, it would turn the planet into a radioactive wasteland. It only showed how science illiterate he is. But people lap it up because people are dumbarse twerps (or yanks)
A 200 day trip is not an insurmountable challenge. Geez, when the British sailed convicts to Australia that trip was over 250 days and those prisoners were chained, whipped and malnourished. I dont think they had decent toilet facilities either or had much chance to see above deck for fresh air. By comparison, a 200 day journey in a space capsule would be far less stressful
-
Mr. E Musk, US owner of SpaceX, Tesla and Twitter companies, offers tourist trips to planet Mars on his spacecrafts. The one-way trip takes 200 days, so after take off Earth you have to spend 200 days in space looking out of a window, etc. After landing Mars you have to spend some time there to await the return trip, when Mars and Earth are suitably lined up. Then the return trip can start, which takes only 199 days as Sun gravity pulls you back. Musk has sold plenty trips so there is a waiting list.
Do you have a link to this plan from Elon?
I'm not sure people should trust Elon on the subject of anything these days. Elon only cares about Elon
Mars would be a one way trip. But even so, as evidenced by the hoax 'Mars One' project, there are no shortage of twerps who would rush for the suicide mission. Actually, calling it a 'mission' is generous. Without any infrastructure or materials that have already been dropped off ahead of humans arrival, you will last until your oxygen supply runs out.
Also, why would anyone go colonise a planet where Elon memed and sold T-shirts of 'Nuke Mars'. - Without understanding how ridiculous than plan was even in the context of starting a greenhouse effect and melting the ice caps. (you would need about 3500 nukes every day for 7 weeks LOL). Not only that, it would turn the planet into a radioactive wasteland. It only showed how science illiterate he is. But people lap it up because people are dumbarse twerps (or yanks)
A 200 day trip is not an insurmountable challenge. Geez, when the British sailed convicts to Australia that trip was over 250 days and those prisoners were chained, whipped and malnourished. I dont think they had decent toilet facilities either or had much chance to see above deck for fresh air. By comparison, a 200 day journey in a space capsule would be far less stressful
Are you suggesting we shall deport convicts to Mars????
-
Mr. E Musk, US owner of SpaceX, Tesla and Twitter companies, offers tourist trips to planet Mars on his spacecrafts. The one-way trip takes 200 days, so after take off Earth you have to spend 200 days in space looking out of a window, etc. After landing Mars you have to spend some time there to await the return trip, when Mars and Earth are suitably lined up. Then the return trip can start, which takes only 199 days as Sun gravity pulls you back. Musk has sold plenty trips so there is a waiting list.
Read his post again . . . Think retartud rapper.
-
Mr. E Musk, US owner of SpaceX, Tesla and Twitter companies, offers tourist trips to planet Mars on his spacecrafts. The one-way trip takes 200 days, so after take off Earth you have to spend 200 days in space looking out of a window, etc. After landing Mars you have to spend some time there to await the return trip, when Mars and Earth are suitably lined up. Then the return trip can start, which takes only 199 days as Sun gravity pulls you back. Musk has sold plenty trips so there is a waiting list.
Do you have a link to this plan from Elon?
I'm not sure people should trust Elon on the subject of anything these days. Elon only cares about Elon
Mars would be a one way trip. But even so, as evidenced by the hoax 'Mars One' project, there are no shortage of twerps who would rush for the suicide mission. Actually, calling it a 'mission' is generous. Without any infrastructure or materials that have already been dropped off ahead of humans arrival, you will last until your oxygen supply runs out.
Also, why would anyone go colonise a planet where Elon memed and sold T-shirts of 'Nuke Mars'. - Without understanding how ridiculous than plan was even in the context of starting a greenhouse effect and melting the ice caps. (you would need about 3500 nukes every day for 7 weeks LOL). Not only that, it would turn the planet into a radioactive wasteland. It only showed how science illiterate he is. But people lap it up because people are dumbarse twerps (or yanks)
A 200 day trip is not an insurmountable challenge. Geez, when the British sailed convicts to Australia that trip was over 250 days and those prisoners were chained, whipped and malnourished. I dont think they had decent toilet facilities either or had much chance to see above deck for fresh air. By comparison, a 200 day journey in a space capsule would be far less stressful
Are you suggesting we shall deport convicts to Mars????
Not unless we are doing creative ways to carry out executions
-
Are you suggesting we shall deport convicts to Mars? ???
. . . trolls
-
Mr. E Musk, US owner of SpaceX, Tesla and Twitter companies, offers tourist trips to planet Mars on his spacecrafts. The one-way trip takes 200 days, so after take off Earth you have to spend 200 days in space looking out of a window, etc. After landing Mars you have to spend some time there to await the return trip, when Mars and Earth are suitably lined up. Then the return trip can start, which takes only 199 days as Sun gravity pulls you back. Musk has sold plenty trips so there is a waiting list.
The time it takes to go to Mars depends on how much energy the vehicle in earth orbit has, and how efficiently it can use as well as the exact orbital characteristics of Mars and Earth at the time. A fully fuelled starship can get to Mars in anywhere from 140 to 180 days depending on these things.
Musk has not sold any trips to Mars, this is just you tripping on what ever you have been smoking when you wrote this.
-
Mr. E Musk, US owner of SpaceX, Tesla and Twitter companies, offers tourist trips to planet Mars on his spacecrafts. The one-way trip takes 200 days, so after take off Earth you have to spend 200 days in space looking out of a window, etc. After landing Mars you have to spend some time there to await the return trip, when Mars and Earth are suitably lined up. Then the return trip can start, which takes only 199 days as Sun gravity pulls you back. Musk has sold plenty trips so there is a waiting list.
The time it takes to go to Mars depends on how much energy the vehicle in earth orbit has, and how efficiently it can use as well as the exact orbital characteristics of Mars and Earth at the time. A fully fuelled starship can get to Mars in anywhere from 140 to 180 days depending on these things.
Musk has not sold any trips to Mars, this is just you tripping on what ever you have been smoking when you wrote this.
No, time to go to Mars is just a question of space craft departure speed and direction leaving Earth at lift-off apart from locations of Earth/Mars during the trip. The higher the speed and the better the direction your time of trip can be reduced. But regardless, only earth gravity will slow you down in orbit during the trip, and best is to arrive Mars at minimum velocity for landing Mars. If you miss Mars, you will just continue orbiting Earth until you die. Assuming you arrive at Mars, your next problem is how to brake, change direction and land without crashing on Mars. And it is not easy. If you know, how to do it, tell me.
-
Mr. E Musk, US owner of SpaceX, Tesla and Twitter companies, offers tourist trips to planet Mars on his spacecrafts. The one-way trip takes 200 days, so after take off Earth you have to spend 200 days in space looking out of a window, etc. After landing Mars you have to spend some time there to await the return trip, when Mars and Earth are suitably lined up. Then the return trip can start, which takes only 199 days as Sun gravity pulls you back. Musk has sold plenty trips so there is a waiting list.
The time it takes to go to Mars depends on how much energy the vehicle in earth orbit has, and how efficiently it can use as well as the exact orbital characteristics of Mars and Earth at the time. A fully fuelled starship can get to Mars in anywhere from 140 to 180 days depending on these things.
Musk has not sold any trips to Mars, this is just you tripping on what ever you have been smoking when you wrote this.
No, time to go to Mars is just a question of space craft departure speed and direction leaving Earth at lift-off apart from locations of Earth/Mars during the trip. The higher the speed and the better the direction your time of trip can be reduced. But regardless, only earth gravity will slow you down in orbit during the trip, and best is to arrive Mars at minimum velocity for landing Mars. If you miss Mars, you will just continue orbiting Earth until you die. Assuming you arrive at Mars, your next problem is how to brake, change direction and land without crashing on Mars. And it is not easy. If you know, how to do it, tell me.
Earth has an escape velocity of about 11.2km/s. Exceed that and you wont be bound by Earths gravity. Why if you fly past Mars and miss it would you still be tied to Earths Gravity? Is the Juno probe around Jupiter orbiting the Earth?
C'mon!
We can agree that colonisation of Mars is a bogus idea and only hapless morons buy into the bullshit Elon is selling. But in theory you could get a hapless moron to Mars - just no guarantee of survival beyond how long they can hold their breath
-
Mr. E Musk, US owner of SpaceX, Tesla and Twitter companies, offers tourist trips to planet Mars on his spacecrafts. The one-way trip takes 200 days, so after take off Earth you have to spend 200 days in space looking out of a window, etc. After landing Mars you have to spend some time there to await the return trip, when Mars and Earth are suitably lined up. Then the return trip can start, which takes only 199 days as Sun gravity pulls you back. Musk has sold plenty trips so there is a waiting list.
The time it takes to go to Mars depends on how much energy the vehicle in earth orbit has, and how efficiently it can use as well as the exact orbital characteristics of Mars and Earth at the time. A fully fuelled starship can get to Mars in anywhere from 140 to 180 days depending on these things.
Musk has not sold any trips to Mars, this is just you tripping on what ever you have been smoking when you wrote this.
No, time to go to Mars is just a question of space craft departure speed and direction leaving Earth at lift-off apart from locations of Earth/Mars during the trip. The higher the speed and the better the direction your time of trip can be reduced. But regardless, only earth gravity will slow you down in orbit during the trip, and best is to arrive Mars at minimum velocity for landing Mars. If you miss Mars, you will just continue orbiting Earth until you die. Assuming you arrive at Mars, your next problem is how to brake, change direction and land without crashing on Mars. And it is not easy. If you know, how to do it, tell me.
Earth has an escape velocity of about 11.2km/s. Exceed that and you wont be bound by Earths gravity. Why if you fly past Mars and miss it would you still be tied to Earths Gravity? Is the Juno probe around Jupiter orbiting the Earth?
C'mon!
We can agree that colonisation of Mars is a bogus idea and only hapless morons buy into the bullshit Elon is selling. But in theory you could get a hapless moron to Mars - just no guarantee of survival beyond how long they can hold their breath
I think you have not understood "escape velocity" and what "gravity" is all about. I explain it at my popular website since >20 years.
-
Mr. E Musk, US owner of SpaceX, Tesla and Twitter companies, offers tourist trips to planet Mars on his spacecrafts. The one-way trip takes 200 days, so after take off Earth you have to spend 200 days in space looking out of a window, etc. After landing Mars you have to spend some time there to await the return trip, when Mars and Earth are suitably lined up. Then the return trip can start, which takes only 199 days as Sun gravity pulls you back. Musk has sold plenty trips so there is a waiting list.
The time it takes to go to Mars depends on how much energy the vehicle in earth orbit has, and how efficiently it can use as well as the exact orbital characteristics of Mars and Earth at the time. A fully fuelled starship can get to Mars in anywhere from 140 to 180 days depending on these things.
Musk has not sold any trips to Mars, this is just you tripping on what ever you have been smoking when you wrote this.
No, time to go to Mars is just a question of space craft departure speed and direction leaving Earth at lift-off apart from locations of Earth/Mars during the trip. The higher the speed and the better the direction your time of trip can be reduced. But regardless, only earth gravity will slow you down in orbit during the trip, and best is to arrive Mars at minimum velocity for landing Mars. If you miss Mars, you will just continue orbiting Earth until you die. Assuming you arrive at Mars, your next problem is how to brake, change direction and land without crashing on Mars. And it is not easy. If you know, how to do it, tell me.
Earth has an escape velocity of about 11.2km/s. Exceed that and you wont be bound by Earths gravity. Why if you fly past Mars and miss it would you still be tied to Earths Gravity? Is the Juno probe around Jupiter orbiting the Earth?
C'mon!
We can agree that colonisation of Mars is a bogus idea and only hapless morons buy into the bullshit Elon is selling. But in theory you could get a hapless moron to Mars - just no guarantee of survival beyond how long they can hold their breath
I think you have not understood "escape velocity" and what "gravity" is all about. I explain it at my popular website since >20 years.
Why dont you give us all a quick rundown on escape velocity and gravity right here and now
-
Mr. E Musk, US owner of SpaceX, Tesla and Twitter companies, offers tourist trips to planet Mars on his spacecrafts. The one-way trip takes 200 days, so after take off Earth you have to spend 200 days in space looking out of a window, etc. After landing Mars you have to spend some time there to await the return trip, when Mars and Earth are suitably lined up. Then the return trip can start, which takes only 199 days as Sun gravity pulls you back. Musk has sold plenty trips so there is a waiting list.
The time it takes to go to Mars depends on how much energy the vehicle in earth orbit has, and how efficiently it can use as well as the exact orbital characteristics of Mars and Earth at the time. A fully fuelled starship can get to Mars in anywhere from 140 to 180 days depending on these things.
Musk has not sold any trips to Mars, this is just you tripping on what ever you have been smoking when you wrote this.
No, time to go to Mars is just a question of space craft departure speed and direction leaving Earth at lift-off apart from locations of Earth/Mars during the trip. The higher the speed and the better the direction your time of trip can be reduced. But regardless, only earth gravity will slow you down in orbit during the trip, and best is to arrive Mars at minimum velocity for landing Mars. If you miss Mars, you will just continue orbiting Earth until you die. Assuming you arrive at Mars, your next problem is how to brake, change direction and land without crashing on Mars. And it is not easy. If you know, how to do it, tell me.
Earth has an escape velocity of about 11.2km/s. Exceed that and you wont be bound by Earths gravity. Why if you fly past Mars and miss it would you still be tied to Earths Gravity? Is the Juno probe around Jupiter orbiting the Earth?
C'mon!
We can agree that colonisation of Mars is a bogus idea and only hapless morons buy into the bullshit Elon is selling. But in theory you could get a hapless moron to Mars - just no guarantee of survival beyond how long they can hold their breath
He's right. Kinda.
Flying a ship in a straight line is not energy effecient. Typically you'll have a ship orbit Earth, using its's gravity to circle around to incercept Mars.
Where he's wrong, is that if you miss mars, odds are it'll still throw off your trajectory and you'll lose your earth orbit. Unless you miss mars by ALOT.
Example:
https://mars.nasa.gov/resources/25156/perseverances-route-to-mars/
You can see the orbital path (circular) to go from Earth to Mars.
-
Mr. E Musk, US owner of SpaceX, Tesla and Twitter companies, offers tourist trips to planet Mars on his spacecrafts. The one-way trip takes 200 days, so after take off Earth you have to spend 200 days in space looking out of a window, etc. After landing Mars you have to spend some time there to await the return trip, when Mars and Earth are suitably lined up. Then the return trip can start, which takes only 199 days as Sun gravity pulls you back. Musk has sold plenty trips so there is a waiting list.
The time it takes to go to Mars depends on how much energy the vehicle in earth orbit has, and how efficiently it can use as well as the exact orbital characteristics of Mars and Earth at the time. A fully fuelled starship can get to Mars in anywhere from 140 to 180 days depending on these things.
Musk has not sold any trips to Mars, this is just you tripping on what ever you have been smoking when you wrote this.
No, time to go to Mars is just a question of space craft departure speed and direction leaving Earth at lift-off apart from locations of Earth/Mars during the trip. The higher the speed and the better the direction your time of trip can be reduced. But regardless, only earth gravity will slow you down in orbit during the trip, and best is to arrive Mars at minimum velocity for landing Mars. If you miss Mars, you will just continue orbiting Earth until you die. Assuming you arrive at Mars, your next problem is how to brake, change direction and land without crashing on Mars. And it is not easy. If you know, how to do it, tell me.
Earth has an escape velocity of about 11.2km/s. Exceed that and you wont be bound by Earths gravity. Why if you fly past Mars and miss it would you still be tied to Earths Gravity? Is the Juno probe around Jupiter orbiting the Earth?
C'mon!
We can agree that colonisation of Mars is a bogus idea and only hapless morons buy into the bullshit Elon is selling. But in theory you could get a hapless moron to Mars - just no guarantee of survival beyond how long they can hold their breath
He's right. Kinda.
Flying a ship in a straight line is not energy effecient. Typically you'll have a ship orbit Earth, using its's gravity to circle around to incercept Mars.
Where he's wrong, is that if you miss mars, odds are it'll still throw off your trajectory and you'll lose your earth orbit. Unless you miss mars by ALOT.
Example:
https://mars.nasa.gov/resources/25156/perseverances-route-to-mars/
You can see the orbital path (circular) to go from Earth to Mars.
LOL -the banana shaped, variable speed trajectory of NASAs spacecraft flying from Earth to Mars is a joke with planet Earth orbiting the Sun faster than Mars orbits the Sun. Actually planet Earth is hardly moving at all in space, while Mars and Sun orbit each other in space and there is no way to fly to Mars from Earth.
-
This seems like a perfectly reasonable approach (Per Dave's link):
(https://mars.nasa.gov/system/resources/detail_files/25156_Mars_Perseverance_Trajectory_0817.jpg)
(http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/edu/images/activities/launch_window.gif)
It is possible to apply the formula given above to calculate the Δv in km/s needed to enter a Hohmann transfer orbit to arrive at various destinations from Earth (assuming circular orbits for the planets). In this table, the column labeled "Δv to enter Hohmann orbit from Earth's orbit" gives the change from Earth's velocity to the velocity needed to get on a Hohmann ellipse whose other end will be at the desired distance from the Sun. The column labeled "v exiting LEO" gives the velocity needed (in a non-rotating frame of reference centered on the earth) when 300 km above the Earth's surface. This is obtained by adding to the specific kinetic energy the square of the speed (7.73 km/s) of this low Earth orbit (that is, the depth of Earth's gravity well at this LEO). The column "Δv from LEO" is simply the previous speed minus 7.73 km/s.
(https://i.imgur.com/pnti7TE.png)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hohmann_transfer_orbit#Calculation
-
Thankls a lot for the JPL figure, where the space craft takes off from and orbits Earth and arrives Mars where it stops and lands.
Of course Earth does not orbit the Sun as suggested in the JPL picture. It is Mars and the Sun that orbits each other with Earth immobile in between. I can see this from my window and roof garden. Have a look yourself.
-
It is Mars and the Sun that orbits each other with Earth immobile in between. I can see this from my window and roof garden. Have a look yourself.
I think we're done here ::)
-
It is Mars and the Sun that orbits each other with Earth immobile in between. I can see this from my window and roof garden. Have a look yourself.
I think we're done here ::)
But did you look?
-
Yeah, we're done here.
-
Yeah, we're done here.
It is a pity you cannot see how the Sun and Mars orbit each other with Earth in between just rotating around itself. But one day you will understand how it works.
-
Wait? Did Anders really say the Earth is the center of the Universe?
-
Wait? Did Anders really say the Earth is the center of the Universe?
Yes. He's a round earth geocentrist.
-
Wait? Did Anders really say the Earth is the center of the Universe?
Yes. He's a round earth geocentrist.
Actually I do it in writing so it is easy to quote me. I also explain why I think Earth is the center of the Universe. I start by looking out of my window ...
-
Wait? Did Anders really say the Earth is the center of the Universe?
Yes. He's a round earth geocentrist.
Actually I do it in writing so it is easy to quote me. I also explain why I think Earth is the center of the Universe. I start by looking out of my window ...
Where do you end?
-
Wait? Did Anders really say the Earth is the center of the Universe?
Yes. He's a round earth geocentrist.
Actually I do it in writing so it is easy to quote me. I also explain why I think Earth is the center of the Universe. I start by looking out of my window ...
Where do you end?
There is no end or beginning.
-
Wait? Did Anders really say the Earth is the center of the Universe?
Yes. He's a round earth geocentrist.
Actually I do it in writing so it is easy to quote me. I also explain why I think Earth is the center of the Universe. I start by looking out of my window ...
Where do you end?
There is no end or beginning.
Then how can there be a centre?
-
Wait? Did Anders really say the Earth is the center of the Universe?
Yes. He's a round earth geocentrist.
Actually I do it in writing so it is easy to quote me. I also explain why I think Earth is the center of the Universe. I start by looking out of my window ...
Where do you end?
There is no end or beginning.
Then how can there be a centre?
Planet Earth is the center of the Solar system in the Universe.
-
Wait? Did Anders really say the Earth is the center of the Universe?
Yes. He's a round earth geocentrist.
Actually I do it in writing so it is easy to quote me. I also explain why I think Earth is the center of the Universe. I start by looking out of my window ...
Where do you end?
There is no end or beginning.
Then how can there be a centre?
Planet Earth is the center of the Solar system in the Universe.
Then how can there be a centre?
-
Planet Earth is the centre of the Solar system in the Universe.
Everything suddenly makes a lot more sense.
Not the solar system stuff, but Heiwa.
We all knew he was a bit odd in the brain, but this explains what kind of odd he is now.
-
You are just jealous.
-
You are just jealous.
Of your inability to understand how rocket work?
Or that your model of the universe has been abandoned about 400 years?
-
You are just jealous.
Of your inability to understand how rocket work?
Or that your model of the universe has been abandoned about 400 years?
Read https://forgottenbooks.com/en/readbook/TheEarthStandsFast_10493726#5 and tell me what you think.
-
Read https://forgottenbooks.com/en/readbook/TheEarthStandsFast_10493726#5 and tell me what you think.
Published 1868
Remember when I said you where stuck 500 years ago. Well this ancient book was out of date on its first print by about 300 years.
-
Read https://forgottenbooks.com/en/readbook/TheEarthStandsFast_10493726#5 and tell me what you think.
Published 1868
Remember when I said you where stuck 500 years ago. Well this ancient book was out of date on its first print by about 300 years.
Yes, the book was written/printed before I was born, but I like it anyway. It explains why you cannot fly to planet Mars (topic), etc.
-
Yes, the book was written/printed before I was born, but I like it anyway. It explains why you cannot fly to planet Mars (topic), etc.
The guy thinks that the earth is flatter at the poles than the equator because the cold at the poles contracts the earth there. The book explains why the author is an idiot pretty early on.
I understand why you like it.
-
Yes, the book was written/printed before I was born, but I like it anyway. It explains why you cannot fly to planet Mars (topic), etc.
The guy thinks that the earth is flatter at the poles than the equator because the cold at the poles contracts the earth there. The book explains why the author is an idiot pretty early on.
I understand why you like it.
The old book suggests that the Sun orbits Earth, which I like. The book suggests that Earth doesn't rotate around its axis between the poles, which I consider wrong. Earth is a rotating, 360°/24 hrs globe, IMO, but rather immobile between the Sun and planet Mars. Electromagnetic forces keep Earth in place there. Swedish Nobel price winner Hannes Alfvén thinks so. Complicated stuff that is difficult to understand but easy to verify by looking out from any window on Earth watching the sky, the Sun and planet Mars. Nothing to get upset about, unless you are NASA or Musk trying to fly from Earth to Mars, which is not possible.
-
Swedish Nobel price winner Hannes Alvén thinks so.
I just read some of his writing, and no where am I seeing any indication that the thought the Earth or Sun where the centre of the universe. In fact, he writes about the solar system formation in a pretty ordinary fashion by todays standards
https://history.nasa.gov/SP-345/contents.htm (https://history.nasa.gov/SP-345/contents.htm)
https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1984JApA....5...79A&data_type=PDF_HIGH&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf (https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1984JApA....5...79A&data_type=PDF_HIGH&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf)
You may have to give me a source, because I think this is a case of you not understanding his writings.
-
Yes, I list the sources of Hannes Alfvén at my website. Even if Alfvén was Swedish like me he wrote in English, like me.
-
Yes, I list the sources of Hannes Alvén at my website. Even if Alvén was Swedish like me he wrote in English, like me.
No one is going to your website. Sources or they dont exist. I suspect you have selected wildly out of contect text to make your theory work
-
Yes, I list the sources of Hannes Alvén at my website. Even if Alvén was Swedish like me he wrote in English, like me.
No one is going to your website. Sources or they dont exist. I suspect you have selected wildly out of contect text to make your theory work
I have plenty visitors at my site. You are just jealous.
Anyway, what are you going to do during 200 days on a spacecraft going to Mars. Learning Marsian?
-
Anyway, what are you going to do during 200 days on a spacecraft going to Mars. Learning Marsian?
Transfer times can be dramatically reduced. Hohmann trasnsfers are not the only way to travel.
But for the first few decades, everyone going to Mars will be studying and exercising every day on the trip.
It will be a long time before its a recreational cruise.
-
Yes, I list the sources of Hannes Alvén at my website. Even if Alvén was Swedish like me he wrote in English, like me.
No one is going to your website. Sources or they dont exist. I suspect you have selected wildly out of contect text to make your theory work
I have plenty visitors at my site. You are just jealous.
Plenty of spiders and bots...No humans.
You don't even have enough visitors of the human kind to even register on traffic sites...
(https://i.imgur.com/Wd13xry.png)
We'll have to wait till your site "matures" before we can recognize that a human actually visited it...How long has your site been around? 15+ years? It still hasn't matured enough to even register traffic. Hilarious.
-
I am quite happy with my web site. You are just jealous.
-
I am quite happy with my web site. You are just jealous.
I'm not jealous of a website that has so little traffic that it doesn't even register.
-
I am quite happy with my web site. You are just jealous.
I'm not jealous of a website that has so little traffic that it doesn't even register.
Look at the counter bottom left that I zero now and then. I have plenty visitors and good contact with my audience. I just do it for fun anyway with no ads. I make real money elsewhere.
-
I am quite happy with my web site. You are just jealous.
I'm not jealous of a website that has so little traffic that it doesn't even register.
Look at the counter bottom left that I zero now and then. I have plenty visitors and good contact with my audience. I just do it for fun anyway with no ads. I make real money elsewhere.
A counter is like 1992 technology. Modern traffic measurements are infinitely more comprehensive and accurate.
Your traffic is all bots.
Use at a minimum Google Analytics - Look at your 'time on site' stats for your pages & drop-off rates. A "counter" is garbage. Literally no one uses that methodology anymore and haven't in almost decades.
-
I am quite happy with my web site. You are just jealous.
I'm not jealous of a website that has so little traffic that it doesn't even register.
Look at the counter bottom left that I zero now and then. I have plenty visitors and good contact with my audience. I just do it for fun anyway with no ads. I make real money elsewhere.
A counter is like 1992 technology. Modern traffic measurements are infinitely more comprehensive and accurate.
Your traffic is all bots.
Use at a minimum Google Analytics - Look at your 'time on site' stats for your pages & drop-off rates. A "counter" is garbage. Literally no one uses that methodology anymore and haven't in almost decades.
Well, I use this free Statcounter software and it works for me. It tells me who visits my site. I do not use Google as it has never heard about me and my website and six web pages.
-
I am quite happy with my web site. You are just jealous.
I'm not jealous of a website that has so little traffic that it doesn't even register.
Look at the counter bottom left that I zero now and then. I have plenty visitors and good contact with my audience. I just do it for fun anyway with no ads. I make real money elsewhere.
A counter is like 1992 technology. Modern traffic measurements are infinitely more comprehensive and accurate.
Your traffic is all bots.
Use at a minimum Google Analytics - Look at your 'time on site' stats for your pages & drop-off rates. A "counter" is garbage. Literally no one uses that methodology anymore and haven't in almost decades.
Well, I use this free Statcounter software and it works for me. It tells me who visits my site.
Statcounter is like the lowest, least effective traffic analyzer there is. A notch up from a 1993 counter.
I do not use Google as it has never heard about me and my website and six web pages.
Google's share of search is 91.86%. Thanks for proving my point.
-
I am quite happy with my web site. You are just jealous.
I'm not jealous of a website that has so little traffic that it doesn't even register.
Look at the counter bottom left that I zero now and then. I have plenty visitors and good contact with my audience. I just do it for fun anyway with no ads. I make real money elsewhere.
A counter is like 1992 technology. Modern traffic measurements are infinitely more comprehensive and accurate.
Your traffic is all bots.
Use at a minimum Google Analytics - Look at your 'time on site' stats for your pages & drop-off rates. A "counter" is garbage. Literally no one uses that methodology anymore and haven't in almost decades.
Well, I use this free Statcounter software and it works for me. It tells me who visits my site.
Statcounter is like the lowest, least effective traffic analyzer there is. A notch up from a 1993 counter.
I do not use Google as it has never heard about me and my website and six web pages.
Google's share of search is 91.86%. Thanks for proving my point.
Google is shit in my view. Hasn't found my web pages, etc. In spite off this I have plenty visitors. But topic is what to do flying to Mars during 200 days. Any ideas?
-
I am quite happy with my web site. You are just jealous.
I'm not jealous of a website that has so little traffic that it doesn't even register.
Look at the counter bottom left that I zero now and then. I have plenty visitors and good contact with my audience. I just do it for fun anyway with no ads. I make real money elsewhere.
A counter is like 1992 technology. Modern traffic measurements are infinitely more comprehensive and accurate.
Your traffic is all bots.
Use at a minimum Google Analytics - Look at your 'time on site' stats for your pages & drop-off rates. A "counter" is garbage. Literally no one uses that methodology anymore and haven't in almost decades.
Well, I use this free Statcounter software and it works for me. It tells me who visits my site.
Statcounter is like the lowest, least effective traffic analyzer there is. A notch up from a 1993 counter.
I do not use Google as it has never heard about me and my website and six web pages.
Google's share of search is 91.86%. Thanks for proving my point.
Google is shit in my view. Hasn't found my web pages,
Thanks again for proving my point.
In spite off this I have plenty visitors.
Yes, many bots visit. 15 years and Google doesn't even know your site exists. If Google doesn't acknowledge your site, no one does. No "webmaster" in their right mind would let that happen, especially after a decade and a half. Thanks again for proving my point.
But topic is what to do flying to Mars during 200 days. Any ideas?
Drinking champagne and looking out a window.
-
I asked Elon about the champagne on his space flights and he didn't reply. But the view is free if you have a window seat.
-
I thought this would be interesting to drop here.
This is DeltaV map.
(https://external-preview.redd.it/U5iH7huE5qKth7ZFvipXt8vzaFOO99qHFh9o9_SkLLk.png?auto=webp&s=d145ac9ae496abe35fae86fc11a584d62fe42592)
This is how much Delta V (dV) , or change in velocity is needed to go from earth to other places in the solar system. Its overly simplified, as orbits are not perfectly circular and will change depending on the year, time you launch. These numbers are km/s of change in velocity. Meaning, to get to 1km/s, is measured from your current position at that point.
A typical rocket needs a dV of about 9.4km/s to go from earth to LEO. Then an additional 3.91km/s (2.44 + 1.47) to get to Geo orbit.
This gives you an idea of how much energy a rocket needs to expend to get to various places in the solar system. You can obviously expend more energy to get to the destination faster, but it wont be the most efficient route.
Starship and its booster with about 100t of payload has about 9.6km/s of dV from earth surface. Which means it has just enough energy to put 100t in LEO, but not much else.
It can however refill a starship by leaving a depot in orbit and refilling it with 100tons at a time. Each refill will give it an additional energy up to a maximum of 8.6km/s starting from LEO.
This allows nearly any destination available for it in the Solar system. A return trip is a different story.
-
That is super cool. I've been meaning to mess around with KSP forever.
Here's another interesting calculator, so to speak:
NASA Ames Research Center Trajectory Browser (https://trajbrowser.arc.nasa.gov/index.php)
(https://i.imgur.com/3bmXrW3.png)
-
Keeps crashing for me, but I familiar with it.
This is also very nice that it shows how the dV changes over time. Fortunately Mars is not particularly difficult to get to, its just very far.
If you consider that a craft can use its atmosphere to slow down at Mars, its actually possible to land on the surface of Mars with less energy than the surface of the Moon
-
So interesting ESA news.
https://esamultimedia.esa.int/docs/technology/The_Case_for_an_ESA_preparatory_programme_for_Space-Based_Solar_Power_for_terrestrial_energy_needs.pdf
They have just released a study considering space based solar.
This will launch up to 52 2km wide, 2000 ton solar collectors in GEO.
Will need about 500 rocket launches a year for about 20 years of the Starship scale to get it done by 2050.
So Europe could be getting a real rocket program one day