The Flat Earth Society
Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth Debate => Topic started by: Themightykabool on March 05, 2020, 10:19:46 AM
-
Have any of those predicted effrects been experimentally verified? Has the EA formula been finalized and tested against real world observations?
I think that this clearly demonstrates the double standard that FE'ers use when talking about "evidence".
I did test EA against real world observations. I saw the Moon Tilt Illusion for myself. The geometry of FE's EA said that it would not point at the Sun, and would point above the Sun, especially between rising and midmoon.
I also created a 3D model showing that perspective does not explain it. RE conceded without further rebuttal, unable to justify the obviously wrong perspective explanation.
https://wiki.tfes.org/Moon_Tilt_Illusion
-
Hold up.
Your claim was you had a 3d model.
You have neither one of the RE or the FE.
Instead you have 3d pencils and 2d shaded circles.
Yep, there is a 3D model in that link. The 3D model shows that the perspective argument is incorrect.
If you want a special 3D model for whatever, make it yourself for your own argument.
But it was YOUR claim that you debunk convention science with your wiki.
Youve made neither a debunked proof that the RE model does not work by recreating it in a 3d model as you clained.
Instead you made a 3d pencil.
Check your claim.
Very misleading.
You claimed you made a 3d model to prove your tilt explanation.
You did not.
Very misleading.
Conventional science has a plethera of youtubes and websites.
But do keep on deflecting.
This guy paid attention in english class and did a proper job of referencing.
The 3D model in the Wiki shows the perspective explanation to be wrong. That's what I said. A poor reading comprehension on your part.
If you want a special model made of whatever, DO IT YOURSELF.
-
Your 3d model of pencils and green cones does not address the tilt aspect.
It discussed how straight a line is.
It does not model and compare what RE claims is hapoening.
So therefore your non relevant examples are useless.
So you did NOT, as you claim, produce a 3d model debunking peespective.
-
The 3D model in the Wiki shows the perspective explanation to be wrong. That's what I said. A poor reading comprehension on your part.
If you want a special model made of whatever, DO IT YOURSELF.
Good
Please comprehend this -
The 3d model in your wiki shows nothing of the sort.
If you wanted to show it, create a 3d model with actually modeling the RE.
I dont need to because i believe the conventional explanation.
It is not my duty to disprove your lack of disproof, just to merely point out to you youve disprooved nothing.
-
We have an ongoing discussion with several participants in another thread on this topic. I'm not going to split my discussion. Keep your nonsense in there.
-
We have an ongoing discussion with several participants in another thread on this topic. I'm not going to split my discussion. Keep your nonsense in there.
That thread, also started by me, was dedicated to double standards.
Those participants also see i started this thread about moon tilt.
Maybe apply your superior reading comprehension to this point.
-
We have an ongoing discussion with several participants in another thread on this topic. I'm not going to split my discussion. Keep your nonsense in there.
I'd say that discussion is over.
You are now simply trying to find excuses for denying that the explanation of the "Moon terminator illusion" is nothing more than simple perspective.
-
So which of these threads are we carrying on with? Tom apparently objects to starting a new one.
Mods? Any guidance?
-
Keep to this one.
No doubt tomB will dodge you regardless of which thread.
The other was my collection of moments of hypocracy.
-
Electro accelleration from what i gather is a swooping upwards force that makes rays of light from the sun shoot back upwards.
So shouldnt the moon be tilting down, not up?
And does this mean the moon is a reflective celestial ball, not a self illuminating spot light?
And why are we able to see stars?
Their lightpower is 100000x fainter than the sun.
That means any light from these much farther sources should be pushed away from earth and never reach our eyes.
Youre "creating" more problems than youre fixing.