I thought you were meant to be a non-flat Earther?
Did you use the wrong troll account?
I believe you have heard about loads and loads of these experiments when you take a camera zoom to some high building or mountain over see and according to globe theory with curvature 8 inches per mile squared you shouldnt be able to see that building, mountain et cetera but you do. Seriously just look at youtube and you will find example of this pretty fast.Care to explain what that even means?
The following screenshots of the Bathurst Lighthouse on Rottnest Island are taken from Avonmore Tce, Cottesloe Western Australia.
(https://www.dropbox.com/s/wbbnmmcms1x9nr6/Bathurst%20Lighthouse%20from%20100%20ft.jpg?dl=1)
Bathurst Lighthouse from 100 ft(https://www.dropbox.com/s/05kwhacfbdvfhpc/Bathurst%20Lighthouse%20from%206%20ft.jpg?dl=1)
Bathurst Lighthouse from 6 ft
These two photos are from a video of two large cargo ships off the coast near Wollongong, NSW and taken from about 10 m above sea-level.
The nearer ship is all visible but the farther ship's containers are is still very visible but most of the ship is hidden behind something.
And here we have a huge bulk ore carrier quite visible:
(https://i.resimyukle.xyz/bOxy40.jpg)And a container vessel with the hull hidden behind something:
(https://i.resimyukle.xyz/H5Pzfb.jpg)
| (https://i.resimyukle.xyz/JIA5RP.jpg) Sunset at Karumba on August 8, 2007 at 06:25:02 EAST. | (https://i.resimyukle.xyz/deLz9c.jpg) Sunset at Karumba on August 8, 2007 at 06:25:29 EAST. | (https://i.resimyukle.xyz/CUSN9c.jpg) Sunset at Karumba on August 8, 2007 at 06:25:57 EAST. |
1 - your magical math does not interest me and you even didnt show me that math you just say that its there??? weirdNo, I'm saying you haven't shown that there is any problem.
2 - inertia of momentum doesnt work like thatSo when you jump in a moving plane/train/bus/whatever, you see it move below your feet?
3 - I have actually done similar experiment by myself and got similar results.So you were able to see an object which literally cannot be seen, even if Earth was flat?
I thought you were meant to be a non-flat Earther?2 - inertia of momentum doesnt work like that
Did you use the wrong troll account?
1. HOW CAN THERE BE WATER WHEN THE GLOBE IS SPINNING AT 1000 mph
Jack, note the name of our "opponent" - non.flatearther. Maybe a little suspicous ::)?
I's advise treating Mr non.flatearther in a "suitable manner".
2.IF YOU JUMP UP THE EARTH SHOULD MOVE UNDERNEATH YOU
1. HOW CAN THERE BE WATER WHEN THE GLOBE IS SPINNING AT 1000 mph
Seriously this is just ridiculous just as a child spinning too fast on a playground on a carousel the water would just be thrown away with that big forceThink about how rapidly the carousel is spinning in relation to its diameter at the time when the child is flung off.
[/li]
[li]What is covering up the lower part of the Sun in these photos?That sun seems to go from just under the "top half" visible to being entirely obscured in a matter of 55 seconds.
(https://i.resimyukle.xyz/JIA5RP.jpg)
Sunset at Karumba on August 8, 2007 at 06:25:02 EAST.(https://i.resimyukle.xyz/deLz9c.jpg)
Sunset at Karumba on August 8, 2007 at 06:25:29 EAST.(https://i.resimyukle.xyz/CUSN9c.jpg)
Sunset at Karumba on August 8, 2007 at 06:25:57 EAST.
Any ideas as to what is hiding that Sun?
[/li]
[/list]
[/li]
[li]What is covering up the lower part of the Sun in these photos?That sun seems to go from just under the "top half" visible to being entirely obscured in a matter of 55 seconds.
(https://i.resimyukle.xyz/JIA5RP.jpg)
Sunset at Karumba on August 8, 2007 at 06:25:02 EAST.(https://i.resimyukle.xyz/deLz9c.jpg)
Sunset at Karumba on August 8, 2007 at 06:25:29 EAST.(https://i.resimyukle.xyz/CUSN9c.jpg)
Sunset at Karumba on August 8, 2007 at 06:25:57 EAST.
Any ideas as to what is hiding that Sun?
[/li]
[/list]
In RE it is not the Earth that is hiding the sun in those images. When the sun is touching the horizon in RE it is already below it. This is stated without empirical experimental evidence that it is the case. You are presenting us with what RE believes is an illusion to show us that an illusion is not occurring.
In RE it is not the Earth that is hiding the sun in those images.No, it is.
In RE it is not the Earth that is hiding the sun in those images.OK, something is hiding some and finally all of that Sun. What is that something?
Actually, it is the Earth hiding the sun in those images.[/li]
[li]What is covering up the lower part of the Sun in these photos?That sun seems to go from just under the "top half" visible to being entirely obscured in a matter of 55 seconds.
(https://i.resimyukle.xyz/JIA5RP.jpg)
Sunset at Karumba on August 8, 2007 at 06:25:02 EAST.(https://i.resimyukle.xyz/deLz9c.jpg)
Sunset at Karumba on August 8, 2007 at 06:25:29 EAST.(https://i.resimyukle.xyz/CUSN9c.jpg)
Sunset at Karumba on August 8, 2007 at 06:25:57 EAST.
Any ideas as to what is hiding that Sun?
[/li]
[/list]
In RE it is not the Earth that is hiding the sun in those images.
When the sun is touching the horizon in RE it is already below it. This is stated without empirical experimental evidence that it is the case.No Tom, it's stated using the known optical properties of the atmosphere and the proven effects of refraction.
You are presenting us with what RE believes is an illusion to show us that an illusion is not occurring.Again, no. RE sunsets are not an illusion. The fact that the sun appears slightly higher than it really is does not change the fact that the sun is being hidden by the Earth. It only means that we see it about 5-10 minutes later than it actually happens.
Nice altered gif.I thought you were meant to be a non-flat Earther?2 - inertia of momentum doesnt work like that
Did you use the wrong troll account?
Gotta love physics:
(https://i.imgur.com/kcYCKw2.gif)
I'll also answer, even though non.flatearther should understand he is wrong.Horse hockey.
1. Do you fly off a merry-go-round when it is spinning? No. The Earth is simply not fast enough.
Nice altered gif.I thought you were meant to be a non-flat Earther?2 - inertia of momentum doesnt work like that
Did you use the wrong troll account?
Gotta love physics:
(https://i.imgur.com/kcYCKw2.gif)
Care to explain the purpose of the movements of the two gibronis standing on the trampoline?
Hint - They are not just standing.
I'll also answer, even though non.flatearther should understand he is wrong.Horse hockey.
1. Do you fly off a merry-go-round when it is spinning? No. The Earth is simply not fast enough.
Meet a friend down at a park and go to the merry-go-round.
You stand on the merry-go-round.
Now, have your friend set the merry-go-round a spinning.
You jump straight up as high as you can go.
No freaking way you land on the same spot.
Nice altered gif.Any justification to claim it is altered?
Care to explain the purpose of the movements of the two gibronis standing on the trampoline?They are stretching the trampoline to provide more force to the person in the middle.
Not the question that was being asked.I'll also answer, even though non.flatearther should understand he is wrong.Horse hockey.
1. Do you fly off a merry-go-round when it is spinning? No. The Earth is simply not fast enough.
Meet a friend down at a park and go to the merry-go-round.
You stand on the merry-go-round.
Now, have your friend set the merry-go-round a spinning.
You jump straight up as high as you can go.
No freaking way you land on the same spot.
The train is not accelerating. This is why he lands.And the Earth has angular-acceleration, which can now be readily measured at approximately 7.292 x10-5 rad/s, as poor Bob Knodel found :o to his dismay ;D.
Your example of a merry-go-round would have rotational acceleration. You would break your neck, if I'm presuming the right kind of 'merry-go-round'.
The train is not accelerating. This is why he lands.
Your example of a merry-go-round would have rotational acceleration. You would break your neck, if I'm presuming the right kind of 'merry-go-round'.
It is amazing these great minds of science located here at a flat earth forum can make such astounding claims, like the earth has been spinning about an axis for millions and millions of years at a constant speed of one revolution per 24 hours, despite the contradicting laws of thermodynamics(like entropy) which clearly tell us such an idea would be utter nonsense.
I notice your inability to actually write about entropy.It is amazing these great minds of science located here at a flat earth forum can make such astounding claims, like the earth has been spinning about an axis for millions and millions of years at a constant speed of one revolution per 24 hours, despite the contradicting laws of thermodynamics(like entropy) which clearly tell us such an idea would be utter nonsense.
Another flat earther talking crap about the laws of thermodynamics.
If there was a problem with the heliocentric model and the laws of thermodynamics, someone would have noticed very quickly. There isn’t though. You are just making up whatever suits your argument.
I notice your inability to actually write about entropy.It is amazing these great minds of science located here at a flat earth forum can make such astounding claims, like the earth has been spinning about an axis for millions and millions of years at a constant speed of one revolution per 24 hours, despite the contradicting laws of thermodynamics(like entropy) which clearly tell us such an idea would be utter nonsense.
Another flat earther talking crap about the laws of thermodynamics.
If there was a problem with the heliocentric model and the laws of thermodynamics, someone would have noticed very quickly. There isn’t though. You are just making up whatever suits your argument.
I notice your inability to actually write about entropy.It is amazing these great minds of science located here at a flat earth forum can make such astounding claims, like the earth has been spinning about an axis for millions and millions of years at a constant speed of one revolution per 24 hours, despite the contradicting laws of thermodynamics(like entropy) which clearly tell us such an idea would be utter nonsense.
Another flat earther talking crap about the laws of thermodynamics.
If there was a problem with the heliocentric model and the laws of thermodynamics, someone would have noticed very quickly. There isn’t though. You are just making up whatever suits your argument.
Hard to write "it is quickly fading..." when it was never apparent to begin with.I notice your inability to actually write about entropy.It is amazing these great minds of science located here at a flat earth forum can make such astounding claims, like the earth has been spinning about an axis for millions and millions of years at a constant speed of one revolution per 24 hours, despite the contradicting laws of thermodynamics(like entropy) which clearly tell us such an idea would be utter nonsense.
Another flat earther talking crap about the laws of thermodynamics.
If there was a problem with the heliocentric model and the laws of thermodynamics, someone would have noticed very quickly. There isn’t though. You are just making up whatever suits your argument.
It's quickly fading.
Nope.I notice your inability to actually write about entropy.It is amazing these great minds of science located here at a flat earth forum can make such astounding claims, like the earth has been spinning about an axis for millions and millions of years at a constant speed of one revolution per 24 hours, despite the contradicting laws of thermodynamics(like entropy) which clearly tell us such an idea would be utter nonsense.
Another flat earther talking crap about the laws of thermodynamics.
If there was a problem with the heliocentric model and the laws of thermodynamics, someone would have noticed very quickly. There isn’t though. You are just making up whatever suits your argument.
Hahaha!
Do you think just writing “thermodynamics (like entropy)” demonstrates your deep understanding of the subject?
Or do you just expect me explain in detail why a claim you pulled out your arse is rubbish?That would be good.
Sorry, no. Find a credible citation, then we can talk.Oh, I see...
Or if you just personally don’t understand it, feel free to ask. But you not understanding something does not make it a “law of thermodynamics”.Why would you attribute laws of thermodynamics to me?
you want me to provide you with a definition of entropy...okay...Go on, tell us what that has to do with contradicting the idea that "the earth has been spinning about an axis for millions and millions of years at a constant speed of one revolution per 24 hours."
Entropy is the tendency for things to fall into a state of disorganization...
the earth has been spinning about an axis for millions and millions of years at a constant speed of one revolution per 24 hoursNo, due to gravitational interactions with the moon and the motion of techtonic plates and the like it has not been constant.
despite the contradicting laws of thermodynamics(like entropy) which clearly tell us such an idea would be utter nonsense.And which contradicting laws would that be?
Hard to write "it is quickly fading..." when it was never apparent to begin with.I notice your inability to actually write about entropy.It is amazing these great minds of science located here at a flat earth forum can make such astounding claims, like the earth has been spinning about an axis for millions and millions of years at a constant speed of one revolution per 24 hours, despite the contradicting laws of thermodynamics(like entropy) which clearly tell us such an idea would be utter nonsense.
Another flat earther talking crap about the laws of thermodynamics.
If there was a problem with the heliocentric model and the laws of thermodynamics, someone would have noticed very quickly. There isn’t though. You are just making up whatever suits your argument.
It's quickly fading.Nope.I notice your inability to actually write about entropy.It is amazing these great minds of science located here at a flat earth forum can make such astounding claims, like the earth has been spinning about an axis for millions and millions of years at a constant speed of one revolution per 24 hours, despite the contradicting laws of thermodynamics(like entropy) which clearly tell us such an idea would be utter nonsense.
Another flat earther talking crap about the laws of thermodynamics.
If there was a problem with the heliocentric model and the laws of thermodynamics, someone would have noticed very quickly. There isn’t though. You are just making up whatever suits your argument.
Hahaha!
Do you think just writing “thermodynamics (like entropy)” demonstrates your deep understanding of the subject?Or do you just expect me explain in detail why a claim you pulled out your arse is rubbish?That would be good.Sorry, no. Find a credible citation, then we can talk.Oh, I see...
you want me to provide you with a definition of entropy...okay...
Entropy is the tendency for things to fall into a state of disorganization...Or if you just personally don’t understand it, feel free to ask. But you not understanding something does not make it a “law of thermodynamics”.Why would you attribute laws of thermodynamics to me?
I didn't write them.
They were formed on visible, verifiable facts, unlike the crapola you believe.
It is amazing these great minds of science located here at a flat earth forum can make such astounding claims, like the earth has been spinning about an axis for millions and millions of years at a constant speed of one revolution per 24 hours, despite the contradicting laws of thermodynamics(like entropy) which clearly tell us such an idea would be utter nonsense.Except that:
Days on Earth Really Are Getting Longer Thanks to The Moon - They Used to Be Just 18 Hours (https://www.sciencealert.com/earth-days-getting-longer-lunar-retreat-astrochronology)
Time seems to move faster as we age, but it turns out that maybe the opposite is true: our days on Earth are getting longer over time, and it's all thanks to the Moon's effect on our planet's rotation.
But don't go planning your extra sleep-ins just yet. A new study has traced the relationship between Earth and the Moon back 1.4 billion years, and found that, all the way back then, a day was just over 18 hours.
That means we've gained an extra six hours, give or take, since then - or, on average, a very unnoticeable 0.00001542857 seconds a year.
And the reason is because the Moon is constantly, and ever-so-slightly, moving away from us. 1.4 billion years ago, it was a fair bit closer, and Earth's rotation was faster.
It is amazing these great minds of science located here at a flat earth forum can make such astounding claims, like the earth has been spinning about an axis for millions and millions of years at a constant speed of one revolution per 24 hours, despite the contradicting laws of thermodynamics(like entropy) which clearly tell us such an idea would be utter nonsense.
I notice your inability to actually write about entropy.It is amazing these great minds of science located here at a flat earth forum can make such astounding claims, like the earth has been spinning about an axis for millions and millions of years at a constant speed of one revolution per 24 hours, despite the contradicting laws of thermodynamics(like entropy) which clearly tell us such an idea would be utter nonsense.
Another flat earther talking crap about the laws of thermodynamics.
If there was a problem with the heliocentric model and the laws of thermodynamics, someone would have noticed very quickly. There isn’t though. You are just making up whatever suits your argument.
Entropy, while just a portion of the second law, is specifically, "...an expression of the disorder or randomness of a system."But the second law of thermodynamics says nothing about have fast the system descends into "disorder or randomness".
Total entropy always increases.
Meaning everything is declining or devolving or degrading.
Not maintaining or improving its state(s) of affairs.
Sorry, but RE doesn't jive.And why not? If you bothered to read this quote you might note that the Earth's rotation rate is slowing down and the moon is moving futher away.
Days on Earth Really Are Getting Longer Thanks to The Moon - They Used to Be Just 18 Hours (https://www.sciencealert.com/earth-days-getting-longer-lunar-retreat-astrochronology)
Time seems to move faster as we age, but it turns out that maybe the opposite is true: our days on Earth are getting longer over time, and it's all thanks to the Moon's effect on our planet's rotation.
But don't go planning your extra sleep-ins just yet. A new study has traced the relationship between Earth and the Moon back 1.4 billion years, and found that, all the way back then, a day was just over 18 hours.
That means we've gained an extra six hours, give or take, since then - or, on average, a very unnoticeable 0.00001542857 seconds a year.
And the reason is because the Moon is constantly, and ever-so-slightly, moving away from us. 1.4 billion years ago, it was a fair bit closer, and Earth's rotation was faster.
So you globemadearthers are attacking our theory for a long time here so I decided to totally debunk your theory without any need for insults and logic that makes no sense in just a few points that their cannot explain and ours can.
1. HOW CAN THERE BE WATER WHEN THE GLOBE IS SPINNING AT 1000 mph
Seriously this is just ridiculous just as a child spinning too fast on a playground on a carousel the water would just be thrown away with that big force. Also no need to say that the speed with which Earth rotates around Sun is also riduculous and the water just couldnt keep up with the Earth. Which brings me to another point.
Sorry, but RE doesn't jive.Only you know what you are talking about. Please, I want to know. Connect the dots between entropy and rotation.
Simply put, rotate the globe at 0.0007 rpm. Because the is the actually rotational speed of the Earth. The purposeful misinformation of using a linear speed because it sounds so fast confuses many people and I honestly believe the majority of people saying it know full well that they are misconstruing things.So you globemadearthers are attacking our theory for a long time here so I decided to totally debunk your theory without any need for insults and logic that makes no sense in just a few points that their cannot explain and ours can.
1. HOW CAN THERE BE WATER WHEN THE GLOBE IS SPINNING AT 1000 mph
Seriously this is just ridiculous just as a child spinning too fast on a playground on a carousel the water would just be thrown away with that big force. Also no need to say that the speed with which Earth rotates around Sun is also riduculous and the water just couldnt keep up with the Earth. Which brings me to another point.
Take a globe (12" diameter, like the ones they have in schools)
Wet the surface with water so water droplets are present on the surface.
Rotate the globe at a rate of 1 rotation every 24 hours.
Does the water droplets fly off?
Scale the globe up to the size of the earth.....
Additionally.
Speed is relative.
The average human male is 6 ft tall. A mile is 5280 ft. Something moving at 100 miles an hour is fast compared to our size.
A garden snail is about 3 inches long. It moves at a rate of 0.029 mph. That is very slow compared to our size.
The earth's circumference is 24901 miles. A 1000 miles per hour is slow.
The solar system is over 7.4B miles in diameter. 1000 miles an hour is so slow it's almost non movement.
Think about it.
Entropy, while just a portion of the second lawi.e. it isn't a law of thermodynamics.
Total entropy always increases.No, it never decreases, and that is only the total entropy of an isolated system.
Sorry, but RE doesn't jive.Why?
Entropy, while just a portion of the second lawi.e. it isn't a law of thermodynamics.
It is a property which the second law discusses.Total entropy always increases.No, it never decreases, and that is only the total entropy of an isolated system.
If you have a non-isolated system then the total entropy of it can decrease if the entropy of the surroundings increase enough to compensate.Sorry, but RE doesn't jive.Why?
Again, you are yet to show a problem.
Again, can you clearly explain why the second law of thermodynamics (the actual law not your misrepresentation of it) indicates Earth couldn't keep rotating at a constant angular velocity?
Clearly explain how this decreases entropy.
So you globemadearthers are attacking our theory for a long time here so I decided to totally debunk your theory without any need for insults and logic that makes no sense in just a few points that their cannot explain and ours can.
1. HOW CAN THERE BE WATER WHEN THE GLOBE IS SPINNING AT 1000 mph
Seriously this is just ridiculous just as a child spinning too fast on a playground on a carousel the water would just be thrown away with that big force. Also no need to say that the speed with which Earth rotates around Sun is also riduculous and the water just couldnt keep up with the Earth. Which brings me to another point.
2.IF YOU JUMP UP THE EARTH SHOULD MOVE UNDERNEATH YOU
And it should move pretty fast... Noone has never seen anything like this so ... I assume that even your little globe brains can see the point.