If I stand in the northern hemisphere and look up at the night sky, over the course of several hours the stars appear to move in a counter-clockwise direction. If I do the same thing in the southern hemisphere, the stars appear to move in a clockwise direction. If I stand on the equator and look both directions, I can observe both apparent motions simultaneously. How can a flat earth model explain this apparent motion of the stars?;) Ever looked at a bi-polar model as Tom Bishop and Sandokhan claim?
For that matter, how can a flat earth model explain the differences in the night sky of the northern and southern hemispheres?
If I stand in the northern hemisphere and look up at the night sky, over the course of several hours the stars appear to move in a counter-clockwise direction. If I do the same thing in the southern hemisphere, the stars appear to move in a clockwise direction.
If your toes are pointing North stars appear to travel right to left.Not all.
If your toes are pointing South stars appear to travel left to right.
If your toes are pointing East stars appear to travel up.
If your toes are pointing West stars appear to travel down.
Because of the glass dome, celestial bodies lights are reflected. There is no regularity even if it is viewed in globe model.You mean there is very significant regularity and predictability, where the main issue that arises is a small offset when near the horizon; with the equinox solidly confirming the globe and destroying all FE models which have the sun always above Earth?
Equinox shall destroy the globe model.
'The Sun' in Arabic means "not seen as it is" or 'hoax'.Bull.
Flight reality is more trustworty than just eyesights.And they likewise confirm the globe and destroy FE models.
If your toes are pointing North stars appear to travel right to left.Not all.
If your toes are pointing South stars appear to travel left to right.
If your toes are pointing East stars appear to travel up.
If your toes are pointing West stars appear to travel down.
If you are in the northern hemisphere, pointing north, a lot of stars do appear to travel right to left. But some, close to the horizon, travel in the opposite direction. The stars appear to circle a point due north.
Likewise, for those in the southern hemisphere facing south, the stars appear to travel in a circle around a point due south.
Read the OP again:If your toes are pointing North stars appear to travel right to left.Not all.
If your toes are pointing South stars appear to travel left to right.
If your toes are pointing East stars appear to travel up.
If your toes are pointing West stars appear to travel down.
If you are in the northern hemisphere, pointing north, a lot of stars do appear to travel right to left. But some, close to the horizon, travel in the opposite direction. The stars appear to circle a point due north.
Likewise, for those in the southern hemisphere facing south, the stars appear to travel in a circle around a point due south.
You are adding details not present in his statement in order to argue your point.
If you are going to alter the foundation you need to make your intention known up front
and allow for a response before you present arguments to back up the new premise.
If I stand in the northern hemisphere and look up at the night sky, over the course of several hours the stars appear to move in a counter-clockwise direction.
If I do the same thing in the southern hemisphere, the stars appear to move in a clockwise direction. If I stand on the equator and look both directions, I can observe both apparent motions simultaneously. How can a flat earth model explain this apparent motion of the stars?
Read the OP again:
If I stand in the northern hemisphere and look up at the night sky, . . .
You are adding details not present in his statement in order to argue your point.No I'm not.
You and JB are so glow-in-the-dark sure of your own superiority that you don't feel any need to pay attention to the actual words the OP used.Hi Pot, meet Kettle.
"If you are in the northern hemisphere, pointing north, a lot of stars do appear to travel right to left. But some, close to the horizon, travel in the opposite direction. The stars appear to circle a point due north."None of what you just said makes sense.
That will not form a round tailed stars then.
There was such video made at California.
A responder said: If that the case:
1. North star stays overhead at California.
Or
2. The earth ain't rotate from west to east.
Yeah, people make fake videos to 'justify' fake theories.
Jack... Show me a non fake video, if you dare. 8)Something tells me you’re gonna yell “fake!” At whatever he shows you.
It will add a sense of normal to the conversation if REers would use the term "hemiplane" in their analysis.It should be worth 0 points:
The usage of of hemiplane is already accepted in society to such a level that it is worth 16 points in the game of Scrabble.
Jack... Show me a non fake video, if you dare. 8)I have already provided you plenty and you just dismiss them all as fake.
It will add a sense of normal to the conversation if REers would use the term "hemiplane" in their analysis.And it has a fundamentally different meaning.
The usage of of hemiplane is already accepted in society to such a level that it is worth 16 points in the game of Scrabble.
If I stand in the northern hemisphere and look up at the night sky, over the course of several hours the stars appear to move in a counter-clockwise direction. If I do the same thing in the southern hemisphere, the stars appear to move in a clockwise direction. If I stand on the equator and look both directions, I can observe both apparent motions simultaneously. How can a flat earth model explain this apparent motion of the stars?
For that matter, how can a flat earth model explain the differences in the night sky of the northern and southern hemispheres?
It will add a sense of normal to the conversation if REers would use the term "hemiplane" in their analysis.Certainly I'll accept that 'hemiplane' is a legitimate English word but please explain how you divide a circular plane into hemiplanes.
The usage of of hemiplane is already accepted in society to such a level that it is worth 16 points in the game of Scrabble.
Read the OP again:
Let's do that . . .
If I stand in the northern hemisphere and look up at the night sky, . . .
"Up" and "North" are not the same thing.
The OP said "Up" not "North".
You and JB are so glow-in-the-dark sure of your own superiority that you don't feel any need to pay attention to the actual words the OP used.
Sure and I never even considered that.Read the OP again:Let's do that . . .If I stand in the northern hemisphere and look up at the night sky, . . .
"Up" and "North" are not the same thing.
The OP said "Up" not "North".
You and JB are so glow-in-the-dark sure of your own superiority that you don't feel any need to pay attention to the actual words the OP used.You select a bit of the OP, Mr B Moose! Read it all!
If I stand in the northern hemisphere and look up at the night sky, over the course of several hours the stars appear to move in a counter-clockwise direction. If I do the same thing in the southern hemisphere, the stars appear to move in a clockwise direction. If I stand on the equator and look both directions, I can observe both apparent motions simultaneously. How can a flat earth model explain this apparent motion of the stars?Then to clinch matters it asks, "how can a flat earth model explain the differences in the night sky of the northern and southern hemispheres?"
For that matter, how can a flat earth model explain the differences in the night sky of the northern and southern hemispheres?