A ;) not quite convincing proof ;) that "the Moon Landing COULDN'T Have Been Faked"!
Please excuse the levity etc, etc.
;) ::) Why the Moon Landing COULDN'T Have Been Faked, CollegeHumor ::) ;)
ADAM RUINS EVERYTHING
::) It's on the internet, of course it's true! ::)
A ;) not quite convincing proof ;) that "the Moon Landing COULDN'T Have Been Faked"!
Please excuse the levity etc, etc.
;) ::) Why the Moon Landing COULDN'T Have Been Faked, CollegeHumor ::) ;)
ADAM RUINS EVERYTHING
::) It's on the internet, of course it's true! ::)
It all boils down to 'the technology to fake it wasn't available in 1969'
Hahahahahahahahahahaha
What a weak, stupid , moronic, ignorant and hilarious argument.
And i thought the pro Apollo fanclub is all about source and proof.
But let's play for a while ......
Q: Why couldn't they fake the footage ?
A The technology to fake it was not around yet !
Q You mean going to the moon and back and all dangers involved was in reach and faking what we saw on tv was impossible in 1969 ?
A Yes that's basically true !
Q And who claims we didn't have the technology to fake it ?
A NASA and uhhhh several lightening and film experts of the days !
Q But several price winning filmmakers and photographers claim the opposite,... not ?
A They are crazy shit and want to earn some dollars with hoaxy shit !
Q hmmmm could NASA have been more advanced without the general public in the know ?
A Yes , but what does it have to do with the topic ?
Q They could have faked it, if they had superiour camera's and technologies than what we assume ?
A I guess so ?
Q It boils down to what NASA was capable of.... right ?
A Indeed !..... and they could not have faked it in 1969 !
Q But only if they used the camera's and techniques mentioned in the catalogues and NASA textbooks !
A Yes .... and we know they could not have faked it with the equipment they had in 1969
Q NASA does not lie..... or would not lie about something when they indeed faked it ?
Iow they faked it, but still haven't told how ?
A Why would NASA do that , going to the moon is much more simple than what you suggest
Q never mind .....
A ;) not quite convincing proof ;) that "the Moon Landing COULDN'T Have Been Faked"!
Please excuse the levity etc, etc.
;) ::) Why the Moon Landing COULDN'T Have Been Faked, CollegeHumor ::) ;)
ADAM RUINS EVERYTHING
::) It's on the internet, of course it's true! ::)
Your winking is creepy. Makes me not want to believe what you just put out.
[<< Irrelevant to what I have for your >>
Jarrah White: "Go away, Flat Earthers & Space Travel Deniers!"
[<< Irrelevant to what I have for your >>
Jarrah White: "Go away, Flat Earthers & Space Travel Deniers!"
Great ! I see that my Q and A demonstrated how faulty your general reasoning is !!!
Furthermore everyone knows Jarrah White detests the notion of a flatearth.
For you to bring that up instead of answering my death on Q and A example says alot.
It is understandable Papa Legba treats you as his naughty dog.
Always nice to have him back and smell your fear towards your master.
Can't want for his arrival to correct you some more, because you are all over the place and someone has to direct you back to your bench !
America used 2 GHz that amatures amateurs and the Russians could not track all the way to the moon , on the moon and back.
Incorrect! Again you have no idea what you are talking about!
NASA published all the frequencies and data needed and to claim that amateurs and the Russians could not track all the way to the moon is total idiocy.
Of course, one single amateur or receiving station could not track Apollo all the way because the earth rotates!
Stop claiming total Moon Hoaxer lies!
The Apollo missions were extensively tracked by numerous professional and amateur groups.
Read and find the description of NASA's data transmission protocols!
UNIFIED S-BAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS TECHNIQUES FOR APOLLO VOLUME 1 - FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION
by John H. Painter and George Hondros, Manned Spacecraft Center, Houston, Texas (https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/19650010806_1965010806.pdf)
And this too, if the noted communications "expert", ;D Ignoramus Dutchy ;D needs more detail, try:
APOLLO EXPERIENCE REPORT - S-BAND SYSTEM SIGNAL DESIGN AND ANALYSIS
Harold R. Rosenberg, Editor, Manned Spacecraft Center, Houston, Texas 77058[/b] (https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19720023255.pdf)
And you might read: Eavesdropping on Apollo 11
The nearly forgotten story of how a radio amateur successfully detected transmissions from the first men to land on the Moon.
In July of 1969 a ham radio operator and amateur radio-astronomer by the name of Larry Baysinger, W4EJA, accomplished an amazing feat. He independently detected radio transmissions from the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface. Fortunately, his accomplishments were recorded by Glenn Rutherford, a young reporter for the Louisville (Kentucky) Courier-Journal. “Lunar Eavesdropping: Louisvillians hear moon walk talk on homemade equipment,” sporting Rutherford’s byline, appeared in the Wednesday, July 23, 1969 issue of that paper — front page of section B, the local news section (see Figure 1). | | (http://www.arrl.org/images/view/AWE/Graney/Figure2b.jpg)
Figure 1
Larry at the receiver |
Rutherford opened the Courier story with “Thanks to some homemade electronic equipment, including a rebuilt 20 year old radio receiver from an Army tank (see Figure 2) and an antenna made of spare pieces of aluminum, nylon cord and chicken wire (see Figure 3 and 4), a small band of Louisvillians was able to ‘eavesdrop’ Sunday (July 20) night on the American astronauts’ conversation directly from the moon.”
(http://www.arrl.org/images/view/AWE/Graney/LB001.jpg)
Figure 2, The Antenna | | (http://www.arrl.org/images/view/AWE/Graney/LB002_SSA1.jpg)
Figure 3, Antenna Design |
The story discussed how Baysinger recorded 35 minutes of conversation from VHF signals transmitted between astronauts Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins (he did not attempt to pick up the encoded S-band signals from the main Moon-Earth communication link).1 These 35 minutes included the time during which President Richard Nixon transmitted a message of congratulations to the astronauts.
Rutherford’s story briefly mentioned how Baysinger had been previously successful in constructing a device to detect radio signals from Jupiter and in tracking and reproducing pictures transmitted from Earth-orbiting satellites. It briefly described the antenna used for the lunar eavesdropping project — a fully steerable 8 × 12 foot “corner horn” — and it briefly discussed the amazing sensitivity of the receiver, which Baysinger specially modified for the lunar eavesdropping project. Rutherford finished the story with “Needless to say, the receiver worked to perfection Sunday night.”
. . . . .
Lunar Eavesdropping Link
More information on Larry’s lunar eavesdropping, including some audio clips, can be found on Christopher Graney’s Otter Creek-South Harrison Observatory Web page, Lunar Eavesdropping In Louisville, Kentucky (http://observatory.jctcfaculty.org/).
Read a lot more in: ARRL, the national association for Amateur Radio, (http://www.arrl.org/eavesdropping-on-apollo-11)
And from a more "professional" source! The Bochum Radio Observatory, Germany
In the 1957 – 1975 period, the 20 metre parabolic antenna of the Bochum Observatory in (the then) West Germany was often in the news as it received transmissions from Russian and American space vehicles. The Director at the time, Professor Heinz Kaminski, was able to provide confirmation of events and data independent of both the Russian and US space agencies.
During the later Apollo missions, the observatory received and recorded some of the Field Sequential Color TV transmissions from the Lunar Rovers on the Moon, as well as biomedical data and voice.(https://www.honeysucklecreek.net/images/other_stations/bochum/Bochum_1972_sm.jpg)
The 20 metre Bochum antenna inside its radome, in 1972.
Photo: Bochum Observatory. With thanks to Thilo Elsner.
An independent recording of the Lunar Landing.
During Apollo 11, the observatory ‘listened in’ on the first lunar landing.
The present Director, Dr. Thilo Elsner, has provided a short audio recording of transmissions received from the Apollo 11 Lunar Module, Eagle, at the time of Lunar touchdown.
The Moon was just above the horizon at the time of the landing, but it was below the horizon for the first step. (See graphic below.)
Hear the Apollo 11 Lunar Landing
audio 430kb mp3 file. (https://www.honeysucklecreek.net/audio/A11_Landing_Bochum_Net1.mp3) In this stereo mp3 file, the recording made at Bochum is on
the right channel – and the NASA Net 1 recording (recorded
at Honeysuckle, but coming from Goldstone) is on the left channel.
Charlie Duke (Capcom in Houston speaking with the astronauts)
– and the associated Quindar tones – are heard only on the left
channel (i.e. the NASA recording) since Bochum could only hear
the transmissions from the Moon – not those being transmitted
to the Moon from the tracking stations on Earth.
Bochum and Net 1 recordings synchronised by Colin Mackellar.
(https://www.honeysucklecreek.net/images/other_stations/bochum/Bochum_fr_Moon_sm.jpg)
This graphic shows the side of the Earth visible from the Moon at the time
Eagle touched down on the lunar surface (2018GMT Sunday 20 July 1969).
As seen from Bochum, the Moon was at a low elevation and was setting.
NASA Manned Space Flight Network stations at Madrid and
Goldstone both tracked Eagle to the surface. |
From: The Bochum Radio Observatory, Germany (https://www.honeysucklecreek.net/other_stations/bochum/main.html)
Dutchy, you make up so many fabricated stories to support your silly claims!