The Flat Earth Society

Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth General => Topic started by: Aophos on January 23, 2018, 01:15:52 PM

Title: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 23, 2018, 01:15:52 PM
Most people are familiar with a few of the 666s, like the tilt of the Earth, but I searched all of NASA's data and "maths," for weeks and maybe even months, and I found that it comes up like a fingerprint - 33 times!

I posted it to IFERS, and was immediately banned. Like, why? Anyway he sounds exactly like Marilyn Manson or any other Satanist with videos like "Jesus Never Existed!" and then saying "Don't be turned off by the title!" Are you freaking kidding me?

Here is a link to the video, which I hope you find interesting:




Here is the list of 666s I found, though the video gives you a better idea and also additional info:


33: The Earth’s Axis, it’s Orbital Inclination around the Sun is 66.6 Degrees

32: The Earth Orbits the Sun at 66,600 Miles Per Hour

31: The Earth’s Circumference is 600x6x6 Nautical Miles

30: The Speed of Sound is 666 Knots Per Second

29: The Force of Gravity on Earth is 666 Newtons

28: The Curvature of A Square Mile is .666 Feet... in 10 Miles: 66.6 Ft... in 20 Miles: 266.6 Ft... 40M: 1,066.6 Ft... 50M: 1,666 Ft… 70M: 3,266.6 Ft… 80M: 4,266.6 Ft… 100M: 6,666.6Ft… The Heliocentric Curvature Math is Based on 666

27: The Arctic & Antarctic Circles are at exactly 66.6°

26: Astro-Not Peggy Whitson Spent 666 Days in Space

25: The Distance to the Moon is 6 x 60 x 666 Miles

24: The Diameter of the Moon is 6 x 6 x 60 Miles

23: Sunset is Divided by 3 Degrees (6° + 6° + 6°) aka: “Civil, Nautical, and Astronomical Twilight”

22: From Mercury, the Sun is 666 Times Brighter, Using the Inverse Square Law

21: Venus is 464° Celsius or 867° Fahrenheit (The Median of These Two Numbers: 666)

20: Mars is at 1.666 AU (Astronomical Units) from the sun at Aphelion

19: Ceres (Classified as a Dwarf Planet in the Asteroid Belt) Has a 466.6 Day Synodic Period

18: The Comet Shoemaker Levy Collided with Jupiter, Traveling at 6 x 6 x 6 x 1000 Kilometers Per Hour

17: Saturn’s Orbital Distance is 1,426,666,422 Kilometers or 9.54 AU

16: The Surface Temperature of Uranus is: -6x6x6°

15: The Surface Temperature of Neptune is: -6x6x6°

14: Pluto’s Orbital Velocity is 4.666 Kilometers Per Second

13: NASA’s Budget is $18 Billion (6+6+6)

12: The Speed of Light is `670,`616,`629 MPH. The Middle Number 616, Some have Claimed Is the Accurate Number of the Beast, instead of 666. The Common Rounded Form... 670,000,000 x .6 x .6 x .6 is also interesting… 144,720,000, because 144 and 72 are Important Biblical Numbers (144,000 Elect and 72 Steps of Jacob’s Ladder to Heaven aka the Stars) 144 Cubits is 216 Feet (6 x 6 x 6) 

11: Saturn’s Hexagonal Pole is a 6 sided, 6 pointed Polygon Representing a Cube Containing 6 Triangles (A Hex), and it is the 6th planet

10: A Day is 23 Hours and 56 Minutes, but We Round it to 60 Seconds, 60 Minutes, and 24 Hours (& 2+4 in Numerology is 6), Because Father Time is Saturn aka Cronos (or Crono-logy) the Greco-Roman God of Time, Chaos, and Death

09: Kepler’s 3rd Law Calculates a Planet’s Mean Distance From the Sun, giving the Planet’s Orbital Period Raised to the Power of .666666

08: On the Globe model, the Distance From the Tip of South America, to the Tip of Africa, is 6,660 Kilometers

07: North America is 66.66° Wide on a Globe - from The Furthest Tip to the Other (Key Largo, Florida, to Yesterday Island, Alaska)

06: Eurasia On the Globe Model, From the Lighthouse in Cape St. Vincent, Portugal, Straight Across to the other side of the land mass at the Haicang Bridge in China, 6,066 Nautical Miles

05: South America, on the Globular Map, From the Northern Most Point to the Southern Most Point, is 66.6° Long, and the Line Passes directly Through the continent’s Highest Peak, Mt. Aconcagua

04: On The Globular Map, Africa is 66.6° Wide From its Western Most Point in Dakar to the Easternmost Projection of Somalia. Forming a perfect cross, it is 66.6° High From its Southernmost Point to the Place Where the Line Running due North Hits the Mediterranean, near Benghazi

03: The Logos of Both Google’s GPS system through Chrome and CERN, Both of Which Work With NASA, We Find 666 hidden in plain sight

02: Switzerland Company Maxon Motors Provided the Electrodrives that Power NASA’s Spirit and Opportunity Rovers on Mars. You can contact them at +41 (41) 666 15 00 by phone or +41 (41) 666 16 16 by Fax

01: Earthlings and Life Itself are Made of Carbon, Which has 6 Protons, 6 Neutrons, and 6 Electrons. Revelations 13:16 “And he causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their forehead.” (NASA: Number of man, Bible: Number of A man).

I do plan on making a few more videos on Flat Earth, but I've got a lot of other subjects I want to cover.



-Adam
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: FalseProphet on January 23, 2018, 01:47:55 PM
Earth's inclination is 7.155°. Months of "research"?
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Denspressure on January 23, 2018, 01:53:21 PM
30: The Speed of Sound is 666 Knots Per Second

ERROR: ROUNDING ERROR.

1 Speed of sound = 666,739 Knots per second. If you remove the decimals, you get 667, not 666.



32: The Earth Orbits the Sun at 66,600 Miles Per Hour

ERROR: FACTUALLY INCORRECT.

"The Earth's orbital speed around the Sun: 30 km/s (108,000 km/h)"
Source: http://www.iop.org/activity/outreach/resources/pips/topics/earth/facts/page_43079.html
108,000 km/h = 67,111 mph

25: The Distance to the Moon is 6 x 60 x 666 Miles

ERROR: NITPICKING & within perigee and apogee

The moon's orbit around Earth is elliptical. At perigee — its closest approach — the moon comes as close as 225,623 miles (363,104 kilometers). At apogee — the farthest away it gets — the moon is 252,088 miles (405,696 km). The average is 238,855.
The perigee and apogee varies from year to year.

Source: https://www.space.com/18145-how-far-is-the-moon.html

6x60x666 = 239,760 miles. Simply within the perigee and apogee.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 23, 2018, 02:06:46 PM
You are welcome to decide what is "valid" for yourself, but I don't particularly feel that it matters if it is a 666.2, or a 666.7 - or a 666.8103548. It's still a 666.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: EvolvedMantisShrimp on January 23, 2018, 02:10:36 PM
Everything you know is wrong.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Curiouser and Curiouser on January 23, 2018, 02:11:14 PM
Sure. I'll join in.

   33: The Earth’s Axis, it’s Orbital Inclination around the Sun is 66.6 Degrees

Sorry, 66.6 (rounded) is not 666

   32: The Earth Orbits the Sun at 66,600 Miles Per Hour

Sorry, 66,600 (rounded) is not 666

   31: The Earth’s Circumference is 600x6x6 Nautical Miles

Sorry, 600x6x6 (rounded) is not 666. 601x6x6 is much closer, but it's not 666 either

   30: The Speed of Sound is 666 Knots Per Second

Sorry, at STP, speed of sound is 667 kps. Go ahead and choose a different temperature, but there's a name for that.

   29: The Force of Gravity on Earth is 666 Newtons

Force of gravity is not measured in Newtons. Sure, a 67.9 kg weight will have a force of 666 Newtons on earth.

... and so on and so on and so on.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Curiouser and Curiouser on January 23, 2018, 02:13:19 PM
You are welcome to decide what is "valid" for yourself, but I don't particularly feel that it matters if it is a 666.2, or a 666.7 - or a 666.8103548. It's still a 666.
You funny!
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Crutchwater on January 23, 2018, 02:15:20 PM
Tip of South America, (Tierra Del Fuego) to the southernmost tip of Africa = 6,628 kilometers

Source: Google Earth
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 23, 2018, 02:26:44 PM
It still has 3 sixes. It doesn't have to be spelled out "666," like in the Bible it says "600, 3 Score (60) and 6," not "666," and the heliocentric model is profuse with religious blasphemy and serpent symbolism, as well as many connections to the Jesuit order and the Vatican. The heliocentric model is make-believe anyway, and it is made up by the very people who worship the devil.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: EvolvedMantisShrimp on January 23, 2018, 02:32:41 PM
It still has 3 sixes. It doesn't have to be spelled out "666," like in the Bible it says "600, 3 Score (60) and 6," not "666," and the heliocentric model is profuse with religious blasphemy and serpent symbolism, as well as many connections to the Jesuit order and the Vatican. The heliocentric model is make-believe anyway, and it is made up by the very people who worship the devil.

I've been to all the meetings and I can assure you, it wasn't us.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 23, 2018, 02:35:08 PM
https://www.livescience.com/32294-how-fast-does-earth-move.html

Live Science says it's 66,600

Your source, IOP says it's 67,111

So you can just pick which "scientific literature" you want... it doesn't mean you're right and I'm wrong.

Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Curiouser and Curiouser on January 23, 2018, 02:36:56 PM
It still has 3 sixes. It doesn't have to be spelled out "666," like in the Bible it says "600, 3 Score (60) and 6," not "666," and the heliocentric model is profuse with religious blasphemy and serpent symbolism, as well as many connections to the Jesuit order and the Vatican. The heliocentric model is make-believe anyway, and it is made up by the very people who worship the devil.
A post of that length and exactly three six-letter words?
6 ... 6 ... 6
Hie thee hence, you devil Aophos! get you gone, spunk of Satan!
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Bullwinkle on January 23, 2018, 02:45:39 PM
Adam is level 23

-Joe
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 23, 2018, 03:23:25 PM
My numbers are correct. Like 66,600 being the speed - and you guys acting like "well this says it's 67,111!" So therefore you're wrong! And I'm RIGHT! Am I in the kiddie section?
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: frenat on January 23, 2018, 03:23:44 PM
It still has 3 sixes. It doesn't have to be spelled out "666," like in the Bible it says "600, 3 Score (60) and 6," not "666,"
You've got it wrong anyway. Where does it say to add the numbers in the Bible?  600, three score (20 20 20), and 6
or
(600) 202-0206
 
It's a phone number.  And it happens to be in Canada.  Nothing to do with NASA.


By the way, most of what you posted has nothing to do with NASA and was known long before NASA existed.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: frenat on January 23, 2018, 03:28:52 PM
My numbers are correct. Like 66,600 being the speed - and you guys acting like "well this says it's 67,111!" So therefore you're wrong! And I'm RIGHT! Am I in the kiddie section?
the speed around the sun isn't constant.  The Earth's orbit is elliptical so it speeds up and slows down. It would only be 66,600 at a particular point.
I did a quick search and found it most often quoted at an average of 30 km/second or 67,000 mph (if you keep the same number of significant digits when converting) or 67,108 mph if you don't.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rabinoz on January 23, 2018, 07:41:56 PM
Most people are familiar with a few of the 666s, like the tilt of the Earth, but I searched all of NASA's data and "maths," for weeks and maybe even months, and I found that it comes up like a fingerprint - 33 times!

Here is the list of 666s I found, though the video gives you a better idea and also additional info:
So what? Most of those depend on the purely man-made units you have chosen to express each in.
Quote from: Aophos

33: The Earth’s Axis, it’s Orbital Inclination around the Sun is 66.6 Degrees
No, it isn't, the "Earth's orbital plane is known as the ecliptic plane" and so "it’s Orbital Inclination around the Sun is" 0.00 "Degrees" by definition!

So please explain where your 66.6 Degrees comes in?

Quote from: Aophos
32: The Earth Orbits the Sun at 66,600 Miles Per Hour
No, it isn't, the "Earth's average orbital speed is about 30 kilometres per second. In other units, that's about 19 miles per second, or 67,000 miles per hour, or 110,000 kilometers per hour.
Though the orbital speed varies from about 65,540 mph to 67780 mph.

Where's your "66,600 Miles Per Hour" again?

Quote from: Aophos
31: The Earth’s Circumference is 600x6x6 Nautical Miles
Only if YOU choose to write it that way, but one Nautical Mile was originally defined for convenience as the distance corresponding to one minute of latitude.

But, in fact the earth's polar circumference is about 21560 Nm and earth's equatorial circumference is about 21640 Nm.
So the Earth’s Circumference varies from 599x6x6 to 601x6x6 Nm, but YOU choose to round them to 600x6x6 Nm.

Where's your "600x6x6 Nautical Miles" again?

Quote from: Aophos
30: The Speed of Sound is 666 Knots Per Second
No, it isn't,! For a start "666 Knots Per Second" is not a speed at all! I guess you meant to say "The Speed of Sound is 666 Knots".
At sea level the speed of sound is about 1225 km/h (661 Knots, 761 mph) and at 30,000 ft is flying 1091 km/h (589 knots, 678 mph).
So you superstiticious 666 ony comes into it if you express the speed in knots and not mph or km/s and the round it to the closest 10 knots.

Where's your "666 Knots Per Second" again?

Quote from: Aophos
29: The Force of Gravity on Earth is 666 Newtons
What do you even mean by this.
Gravity is expressed as Newtons/kiligram (or m/s2) and "standard gravity is, by definition, 9.80665 m/s2.

I fail to see whaere any 666 comes into it!

Quote from: Aophos
28: The Curvature of A Square Mile is .666 Feet... in 10 Miles: 66.6 Ft... in 20 Miles: 266.6 Ft... 40M: 1,066.6 Ft... 50M: 1,666 Ft… 70M: 3,266.6 Ft… 80M: 4,266.6 Ft… 100M: 6,666.6Ft…
[/quote]
Your "The Curvature of A Square Mile is .666 Feet" is totally meaningless.
I guess that you mean of the curve of the earth drops by approximately 8 inches for each (miles)2 or 0.66667 x (miles)2.
You .666 is not more than an approximation that depends on the units chosen - I guess you're a backward person that still uses feet and pounds.
Most people use metres and kilograms, where the above approximation would be 7.85 cm for each (km)2, 8 cm for each (km)2 is close enough.

So your 666 is only when you approximate the results and use feet and miles!

Quote from: Aophos
The Heliocentric Curvature Math is Based on 666
That is complete and utter garbage! Most of your 666's don't exist or they depend on choosing Britsh or American units!
Quote from: Aophos
27: The Arctic & Antarctic Circles are at exactly 66.6°

No, "The Arctic & Antarctic Circles are" NOT "at exactly 66.6°". At present they are very close to 66° 33´ 39" or 66.56083°.
That is NOT "at exactly 66.6°" and what is more is varies with time and is decreasing.

Quote from: Aophos
26: Astro-Notnaught Peggy Whitson Spent 666 Days in Space
Well, she spent 665d 22h 22m hours in space. Ir you choose to round it up to prop up your silly theories, go ahead!

Quote from: Aophos
25: The Distance to the Moon is 6 x 60 x 666 Miles
No it is not! The distance to the Moon varies from about 221440 (6x60x615) miles to 252,720 (6x60x700) Miles.
Sorry, I can't find your 666 anywhere!
Quote from: Aophos
Someone else can tackle your silly artificial superstitions - funny how most simply vanish if you chose metric units.

I do plan on making a few more videos on Flat Earth, but I've got a lot of other subjects I want to cover.
-Adam
[/quote]
You do that! But find a few facts and not superstitious rubbish like this.
You might read the book "How to lie with statistics" - but maybe not, it looks like you might have written it!
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Alpha2Omega on January 23, 2018, 09:39:43 PM
Most people are familiar with a few of the 666s, like the tilt of the Earth, but I searched all of NASA's data and "maths," for weeks and maybe even months, and I found that it comes up like a fingerprint - 33 times!

Here is the list of 666s I found, though the video gives you a better idea and also additional info:
So what? Most of those depend on the purely man-made units you have chosen to express each in.

Not even the same units. Sometimes nautical miles, sometimes statute miles or meters, sometimes seconds sometimes hours. Whatever it takes to get something that contains something close to three sixes.

For angles, use radians instead of degrees. Radian measure is the natural unit for express angles. Exactly 66.6° is 1.1623892818282234982311780518134 radians. Better?
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: wise on January 23, 2018, 09:43:27 PM
ifers is controlled opposition.

These are a bunch of dishonest people don't want to listen a different voice. ifers are in the such as group. Your findings about relationship NASA and 666 was not surprise and well known. I have no idea why did they ban you but as I said earlier, they are not real flat earth believers, they are controlled opposition.

Only here, you can find out trusted flat earth believers.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rabinoz on January 23, 2018, 10:37:38 PM
Your findings about relationship NASA and 666 was not surprise and well known.
Yes, "and well known" to proven deceivers like, The Brotherhood of the Deceivers.

But still, complete utter superstitious rubbish.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 24, 2018, 12:08:38 AM
Well, thankfully at least one person isn't a troll. Why are so many just immediately on the attack? Like "the tip of S. America to the tip of S. Africa isn't 6,066 miles, it's 6,029." You clearly just moved your pointer from the tip to the nearest city at the random point you wanted to move it over a few miles! If they weren't trolls, they wouldn't be trying SO hard to discredit and instead realize that it's a fingerprint and the coincidences are too numerous to ignore. I was warned that this place was a den of vipers, but I'm not going to budge. My numbers are correct, because they come from "scientific" sources. I didn't make the numbers up! I literally searched for the number 666 on NASA's website and others. I'm basically being accused of making up fake numbers! I wasn't the one at NASA who said Mercury is 666 x brighter than Earth from the sun using the inverse square law. They did. These are THEIR numbers, that they give to US. I'm not surprised though, as I can understand that there WOULD be government paid trolls all over this forum... SHOCKER!!! Not. It doesn't matter because when I talk about this to normal regular people they are stunned, so coming to a place where government trolls would definitely BE, it's no surprise that they would automatically try to ridicule and belittle and call me a number 23-er (crazy). I'm not crazy. And hardly any of you actually watched the video showing the sources, which is even more proof that you can't take the debate to the people, and instead want to keep it inside this little bubble you got going here where the public can't see how you are basically trying to psychologically manipulate people like me. Hey, by the way - Jesus Christ loves you! You should consider that you still have a chance to redeem yourself - because Horus isn't Jesus, he was never crucified. Enough of this Zeitgeist bullcrap that you trolling vipers believe in.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Copper Knickers on January 24, 2018, 12:41:47 AM
Well, thankfully at least one person isn't a troll. Why are so many just immediately on the attack? Like "the tip of S. America to the tip of S. Africa isn't 6,066 miles, it's 6,029." You clearly just moved your pointer from the tip to the nearest city at the random point you wanted to move it over a few miles! If they weren't trolls, they wouldn't be trying SO hard to discredit and instead realize that it's a fingerprint and the coincidences are too numerous to ignore. I was warned that this place was a den of vipers, but I'm not going to budge. My numbers are correct, because they come from "scientific" sources. I didn't make the numbers up! I literally searched for the number 666 on NASA's website and others. I'm basically being accused of making up fake numbers! I wasn't the one at NASA who said Mercury is 666 x brighter than Earth from the sun using the inverse square law. They did. These are THEIR numbers, that they give to US. I'm not surprised though, as I can understand that there WOULD be government paid trolls all over this forum... SHOCKER!!! Not. It doesn't matter because when I talk about this to normal regular people they are stunned, so coming to a place where government trolls would definitely BE, it's no surprise that they would automatically try to ridicule and belittle and call me a number 23-er (crazy). I'm not crazy. And hardly any of you actually watched the video showing the sources, which is even more proof that you can't take the debate to the people, and instead want to keep it inside this little bubble you got going here where the public can't see how you are basically trying to psychologically manipulate people like me. Hey, by the way - Jesus Christ loves you! You should consider that you still have a chance to redeem yourself - because Horus isn't Jesus, he was never crucified. Enough of this Zeitgeist bullcrap that you trolling vipers believe in.

Okay, let's suppose, for the sake of argument, that all your numbers are correct. What are you claiming can be concluded from them?
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 24, 2018, 12:43:48 AM
"the speed around the sun isn't constant." Exactly. Because you are not even a Flat Earther! Your words speak volumes that you believe in NASA.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 24, 2018, 12:46:19 AM
Well, thankfully at least one person isn't a troll. Why are so many just immediately on the attack? Like "the tip of S. America to the tip of S. Africa isn't 6,066 miles, it's 6,029." You clearly just moved your pointer from the tip to the nearest city at the random point you wanted to move it over a few miles! If they weren't trolls, they wouldn't be trying SO hard to discredit and instead realize that it's a fingerprint and the coincidences are too numerous to ignore. I was warned that this place was a den of vipers, but I'm not going to budge. My numbers are correct, because they come from "scientific" sources. I didn't make the numbers up! I literally searched for the number 666 on NASA's website and others. I'm basically being accused of making up fake numbers! I wasn't the one at NASA who said Mercury is 666 x brighter than Earth from the sun using the inverse square law. They did. These are THEIR numbers, that they give to US. I'm not surprised though, as I can understand that there WOULD be government paid trolls all over this forum... SHOCKER!!! Not. It doesn't matter because when I talk about this to normal regular people they are stunned, so coming to a place where government trolls would definitely BE, it's no surprise that they would automatically try to ridicule and belittle and call me a number 23-er (crazy). I'm not crazy. And hardly any of you actually watched the video showing the sources, which is even more proof that you can't take the debate to the people, and instead want to keep it inside this little bubble you got going here where the public can't see how you are basically trying to psychologically manipulate people like me. Hey, by the way - Jesus Christ loves you! You should consider that you still have a chance to redeem yourself - because Horus isn't Jesus, he was never crucified. Enough of this Zeitgeist bullcrap that you trolling vipers believe in.

Okay, let's suppose, for the sake of argument, that all your numbers are correct. What are you claiming can be concluded from them?

Dude, I'm not even answering that question. It's OBVIOUS.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rvlvr on January 24, 2018, 01:03:26 AM
I'm thick as a brick. So, please, enlighten me.

Also, just so you know, I am more partial to 616, as that is OG.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Copper Knickers on January 24, 2018, 01:11:49 AM
Well, thankfully at least one person isn't a troll. Why are so many just immediately on the attack? Like "the tip of S. America to the tip of S. Africa isn't 6,066 miles, it's 6,029." You clearly just moved your pointer from the tip to the nearest city at the random point you wanted to move it over a few miles! If they weren't trolls, they wouldn't be trying SO hard to discredit and instead realize that it's a fingerprint and the coincidences are too numerous to ignore. I was warned that this place was a den of vipers, but I'm not going to budge. My numbers are correct, because they come from "scientific" sources. I didn't make the numbers up! I literally searched for the number 666 on NASA's website and others. I'm basically being accused of making up fake numbers! I wasn't the one at NASA who said Mercury is 666 x brighter than Earth from the sun using the inverse square law. They did. These are THEIR numbers, that they give to US. I'm not surprised though, as I can understand that there WOULD be government paid trolls all over this forum... SHOCKER!!! Not. It doesn't matter because when I talk about this to normal regular people they are stunned, so coming to a place where government trolls would definitely BE, it's no surprise that they would automatically try to ridicule and belittle and call me a number 23-er (crazy). I'm not crazy. And hardly any of you actually watched the video showing the sources, which is even more proof that you can't take the debate to the people, and instead want to keep it inside this little bubble you got going here where the public can't see how you are basically trying to psychologically manipulate people like me. Hey, by the way - Jesus Christ loves you! You should consider that you still have a chance to redeem yourself - because Horus isn't Jesus, he was never crucified. Enough of this Zeitgeist bullcrap that you trolling vipers believe in.

Okay, let's suppose, for the sake of argument, that all your numbers are correct. What are you claiming can be concluded from them?

Dude, I'm not even answering that question. It's OBVIOUS.

Really? The only obvious conclusions I come to relate to your lack of critical thinking skills and I'm fairly sure that's not what you meant.

So, please, complete your argument. What are you claiming can be concluded from your numbers should they happen to be correct?
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Denspressure on January 24, 2018, 01:16:35 AM
And enlighten me what the speed of sound has to do with NASA....
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Denspressure on January 24, 2018, 01:18:37 AM
You are welcome to decide what is "valid" for yourself, but I don't particularly feel that it matters if it is a 666.2, or a 666.7 - or a 666.8103548. It's still a 666.
Wrong.
666.7 rounded to whole numbers is 667.
666.8103548 rounded to whole numbers is 667.

Unless your claims need us to throw simple rules of mathematics out of the window. If so, using any sort of number becomes meaningless.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rabinoz on January 24, 2018, 02:13:26 AM

Okay, let's suppose, for the sake of argument, that all your numbers are correct. What are you claiming can be concluded from them?

Dude, I'm not even answering that question. It's OBVIOUS.
The only thing that is OBVIOUS to me is that you are paranoid and highly superstitious.
The numbers you present were so highly contrived that they are totally meaningless.

All humans are very prone to seeing patterns of faces and other familiar scenes and sequences.
Many see simply faces, but some see, say the Madonna, in a piece of toast. The term for this is pareidola, 
The general term is Apophenia. We all do it, but some take it to extremes.
Quote
Apophenia is the tendency to attribute meaning to perceived connections or patterns between seemingly unrelated things. Confirmation bias is a variation of apophenia.

You, with your obvious hatred of the Globe and NASA and taking 666 as the number of the beast manage to force 666 in the most devious ways.

Bye bye.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Curiouser and Curiouser on January 24, 2018, 02:19:01 AM
So therefore you're wrong! And I'm RIGHT!
No, you have been proven to be in league with Satan. The logic and reasoning are perfect and unassailable. The sixes do not lie. Your post is devil-writing and you will burn in eternal fire for your complicity with evil. Repent now, sinner.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: frenat on January 24, 2018, 05:01:55 AM
"the speed around the sun isn't constant." Exactly. Because you are not even a Flat Earther! Your words speak volumes that you believe in NASA.
It has nothing to do with NASA.  It was known before they existed.  Why are YOU obsessed with NASA?
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rvlvr on January 24, 2018, 05:13:36 AM
Believe in NASA, or believe NASA?
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: JimmyTheCrab on January 24, 2018, 05:41:12 AM
National Association of Satanic Astronauts


Case closed.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rvlvr on January 24, 2018, 05:45:15 AM
(https://media0.giphy.com/media/xT0xeJpnrWC4XWblEk/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: SpaceCadet on January 24, 2018, 08:06:39 AM
Flat earthers like this fellow have convinced my of one thing - NASA has a time machine.

They must have.

How else could they have started the conspiracy almost 2000 years before the act creating then was passed? How else could they have gotten ancient scientists to come up with all those theories and calculations that are obviously lies to deceive the whole world long long before they were created? How come they all sold theor souls to the devil, coming up with 33 666s in natural physics, mathematics and geography?

NASA has a time machine
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Macarios on January 24, 2018, 02:26:33 PM
You don't understand.

2500 years ago their name was unknown.
They just started preparing their big world domination.
To make their job easier, they started convincing people that the Earth is globe.
Soon they understood the shape of the Earth won't help them, but there was no return.
People already started to believe them.
So they made it their trademark, for marketing purposes.

"The Globe Earth Society"

To recruit more followers they used the most attractive thing that sells everything.
Sex.
Their slogan was sex-sex-sex and similarity with six-six-six shaped their logo: 666.
So, everyone wanted to join.
But it wasn't easy.
They had to hide their identity and accept only reliable people.

At First Council of Nicaea, 325 AD, when the Bible was created, they had their agents there.
Ofcourse, such an important event couldn't be left unattended.
You would think they would try to prevent the appearance of 666 in the Bible.
But you would be wrong.
They deliberately incorporated it in, because "no publicity is bad publicity".
Mentioning something is important. Will it be in good or bad context is not.
ANY talk about it is enough to draw attention.

Bad word about something helps as much as good word.

Now, 2500 years later they still hide their identity and pull the strings from shadow.
Their membership includes 98.6% of world population, but they still have to hide themselves from remaining witty 1.4%, or everything will fall apart.

They couldn't simply kill them, because if you kill people you can't dominate them.

They even reshaped continents to make their logo recognizable everywhere.
That's why south tip of South America was curved closer to south tip of Africa, to make it exactly 6660 km apart.
(See the image below.)
Later, somewhere during 18th century they defined meter (and kilometer), so people understand why is that distance set that way.

One thing that bothers me is how they did it, if the distance from Manaus to Kinshasa is much greater, being 8348 km.
Manaus and Kinshasa are at similar longitudes as those continental tips.
On Flat Earth distances between same meridians grow as you go south.
From Manaus to Kinshasa distance should be shorter than from those southern tips.
Maybe they really folded the Earth into Globe?
Any ideas?

In 1958, when they needed more convenient way to legalize their money transactions, they transformed into NASA.

(http://i64.tinypic.com/x1yh44.png)
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rabinoz on January 24, 2018, 04:51:44 PM
Kiwis please please don't read any further, just keep eating your fush-n-chups.

You don't understand.
Their slogan was sex-sex-sex and similarity with six-six-six shaped their logo: 666.
You don't understand.  Their slogan was six-six-six and their logo: 666, but being Kiwis everyone thought their slogan was sex-sex-sex.

Just as those Nu Zul'nders can never count above five - they go one, two, three, four, five, sex and get so flustered that they can't go further.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 24, 2018, 08:50:27 PM
Why does anyone who has been here, except for the few respondents here, call you a den of vipers? Just look anywhere on the internet regarding Flat Earth, and anyone who has been here says that this is a nest for vipers. Why do they all say that??? Why do most people say "The Flat Earth Society" is a bunch of liars? Gee, I wonder why. And it's obvious. I see what you did, and I've concluded the same thing for myself.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 24, 2018, 08:54:01 PM
What's his name here? The one with the red snake for his logo... who I proved to be totally wrong... Actually cut and pasted a part of what I said but not the whole thing as if it actually mattered. So if it's 666.1, instead? It doesn't matter! It's still a 666, and you didn't even acknowledge that you LIED. You said the speed of sound, blah blah blah, but didn't answer that I called you out on your LIE. You claimed the Earth was going at 67,111 MPH, and I used a different Scientific Literature that shows the mean velocity at 66,600, and you IGNORED that you LIED. You are a deceiver, and guess what? Nobody is buying it! You're a liar!
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: EvolvedMantisShrimp on January 24, 2018, 08:54:36 PM
Why does anyone who has been here, except for the few respondents here, call you a den of vipers? Just look anywhere on the internet regarding Flat Earth, and anyone who has been here says that this is a nest for vipers. Why do they all say that??? Why do most people say "The Flat Earth Society" is a bunch of liars? Gee, I wonder why. And it's obvious. I see what you did, and I've concluded the same thing for myself.

Mantis shrimp make vipers look cuddly:

Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 24, 2018, 09:00:30 PM
You LIED. I explained that the mean velocity is 66,600, and you used a source that actually agrees with me. And give me time, I will address you all, but one thing at a time. You are DESPERATE to make such ridiculous claims as though I made it up and wrong about my numbers, I did NOT make that number up. You are lying.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Curiouser and Curiouser on January 24, 2018, 09:07:27 PM
You LIED. I explained that the mean velocity is 66,600, and you used a source that actually agrees with me. And give me time, I will address you all, but one thing at a time. You are DESPERATE to make such ridiculous claims as though I made it up and wrong about my numbers, I did NOT make that number up. You are lying.
Hie thee hence, Devil. Your triple six post proves you are allied with Satan. I say, be gone!
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 24, 2018, 09:28:12 PM
You LIED. I explained that the mean velocity is 66,600, and you used a source that actually agrees with me. And give me time, I will address you all, but one thing at a time. You are DESPERATE to make such ridiculous claims as though I made it up and wrong about my numbers, I did NOT make that number up. You are lying.
Hie thee hence, Devil. Your triple six post proves you are allied with Satan. I say, be gone!

I am not the devil. Which you capitalized... Shows EXACTLY who you worship, as you are constantly triggered enough to respond and place forth your idea that the devil should be venerated. I am pointing out the obviousness that he most definitely LIED. The mean velocity of the Earth around the sun according to the heliocentric model is 66,600 miles per hour. I will not be told that it is 67,111 (at it's fastest) as proof that I am wrong. That is absurd. We can go into the others AFTER we settle this. But I suspect you won't address that, because you haven't so far. Just a bunch of subliminal attacks that won't work. He did lie, and it's obvious. He tried his best, though, gotta give him credit, and you too with your constant nonsensical attacks that don't address the source of the 66,600 number, but rather try to dig a spear. We're beyond that magic.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 24, 2018, 09:46:20 PM
Uses a snake as their logo...

Says NASA is correct...

Capitalizing "Devil"

Misrepresents what I'm saying...

Says "you're superstitious"

Yep. We know what you are. LIARS.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Curiouser and Curiouser on January 24, 2018, 09:46:42 PM
You LIED. I explained that the mean velocity is 66,600, and you used a source that actually agrees with me. And give me time, I will address you all, but one thing at a time. You are DESPERATE to make such ridiculous claims as though I made it up and wrong about my numbers, I did NOT make that number up. You are lying.
Hie thee hence, Devil. Your triple six post proves you are allied with Satan. I say, be gone!

I am not the devil. Which you capitalized... Shows EXACTLY who you worship, as you are constantly triggered enough to respond and place forth your idea that the devil should be venerated. I am pointing out the obviousness that he most definitely LIED. The mean velocity of the Earth around the sun according to the heliocentric model is 66,600 miles per hour. I will not be told that it is 67,111 (at it's fastest) as proof that I am wrong. That is absurd. We can go into the others AFTER we settle this. But I suspect you won't address that, because you haven't so far. Just a bunch of subliminal attacks that won't work. He did lie, and it's obvious. He tried his best, though, gotta give him credit, and you too with your constant nonsensical attacks that don't address the source of the 66,600 number, but rather try to dig a spear. We're beyond that magic.
And I point out the obviousness that by your own rationale, three sixes mark the Devil and your post with exactly three six-letter words is more than enough proof that you worship and love the Prince of Darkness! Time enough to contemplate as eternal fire roasts your body and soul.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 24, 2018, 10:19:52 PM
Nah, you skipped a word that had 6 letters (Doesn't). I'm not interested in dealing with you, because you don't want to talk about the numbers. Like I said, I'll deal with you LATER. Right now I want to talk to the red snake who is a blatant LIAR.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Curiouser and Curiouser on January 24, 2018, 10:30:40 PM
Nah, you skipped a word that had 6 letters (Doesn't). I'm not interested in dealing with you, because you don't want to talk about the numbers. Like I said, I'll deal with you LATER. Right now I want to talk to the red snake who is a blatant LIAR.
Doesn't is NOT A SIX LETTER WORD. It's a word with six letters and an apostrophe. No wonder you have trouble with your numbers, you can't count. Sheesh!
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 24, 2018, 10:39:24 PM
An apostrophe is not a letter or a number... You are clearly trying to make this conversation meaningless. You already capitalized on the "Devil." That means that you have chosen your side.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 24, 2018, 10:45:53 PM
If I'm wrong, go ahead. Tell us all what you think about Jesus Christ...
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rabinoz on January 24, 2018, 10:52:00 PM
You LIED. I explained that the mean velocity is 66,600, and you used a source that actually agrees with me. And give me time, I will address you all, but one thing at a time. You are DESPERATE to make such ridiculous claims as though I made it up and wrong about my numbers, I did NOT make that number up. You are lying.
I calculate the average velocity as 107,228 not 66,600.
So to you who measure in mph it is the mark of the beast, but not to me who have used kilometres for decades.
And that is my whole point. You superstitious  numbers are only superstitious to those who use particular units.
By the way, that average velocity is 66,628 mph, which does round to 66,600 mph, but only if you choose mph!

In your idiotic "NASA's 33 666s" almost of them have absolutely no connection with NASA at all, so who lied - or stretched the truth to breaking point?

After looking more closely and adding up your score, all I can say is that you are papanoid and need help.

33: The Earth’s Axis, it’s Orbital Inclination around the Sun is 66.6 Degrees - Incorrect and not the slightest connection to NASA, count -1.
32: The Earth Orbits the Sun at 66,600 Miles Per Hour - not the slightest connection to NASA, count -2.
31: The Earth’s Circumference is 600x6x6 Nautical Miles - not the slightest connection to NASA, count -3.
30: The Speed of Sound is 666 Knots Per Second- Incorrect and not the slightest connection to NASA, count -4.
29: The Force of Gravity on Earth is 666 Newtons- Incorrect and not the slightest connection to NASA, count -5.
28: The Curvature of A Square Mile is .666 Feet... in 10 Miles: 66.6 Ft... in 20 Miles: 266.6 Ft... 40M: 1,066.6 Ft... 50M: 1,666 Ft… 70M: 3,266.6 Ft… 80M: 4,266.6 Ft… 100M: 6,666.6Ft… The Heliocentric Curvature Math is Based on 666 - not the slightest connection to NASA, count -6.
27: The Arctic & Antarctic Circles are at exactly 66.6°- Incorrect and not the slightest connection to NASA, count -7.
26: Astro-Not Peggy Whitson Spent 666 Days in Space - We'll grant you one, count -6[/b][/i].
25: The Distance to the Moon is 6 x 60 x 666 Miles- Incorrect and not the slightest connection to NASA, count -7.
24: The Diameter of the Moon is 6 x 6 x 60 Miles- Incorrect and not the slightest connection to NASA, count -8.
23: Sunset is Divided by 3 Degrees (6° + 6° + 6°) aka: “Civil, Nautical, and Astronomical Twilight”- not the slightest connection to NASA, count -9.
22: From Mercury, the Sun is 666 Times Brighter, Using the Inverse Square Law- not the slightest connection to NASA, count -9.
21: Venus is 464° Celsius or 867° Fahrenheit (The Median of These Two Numbers: 666)- totally contrived rubbish, count -11.
20: Mars is at 1.666 AU (Astronomical Units) from the sun at Aphelion- not the slightest connection to NASA, count -12.
19: Ceres (Classified as a Dwarf Planet in the Asteroid Belt) Has a 466.6 Day Synodic Period- not the slightest connection to NASA, count -13.
18: The Comet Shoemaker Levy Collided with Jupiter, Traveling at 6 x 6 x 6 x 1000 Kilometers Per Hour- sort of connect to NASA, count -13.
17: Saturn’s Orbital Distance is 1,426,666,422 Kilometers or 9.54 AU- not the slightest connection to NASA, count -14.
16: The Surface Temperature of Uranus is: -6x6x6°- sort of connect to NASA, count -14.
15: The Surface Temperature of Neptune is: -6x6x6°- sort of connect to NASA, count -14.
14: Pluto’s Orbital Velocity is 4.666 Kilometers Per Second- not the slightest connection to NASA, count -13.
13: NASA’s Budget is $18 Billion (6+6+6)- not the slightest connection to NASA (it's what they're given), count -13.
12: The Speed of Light is `670,`616,`629 MPH. The Middle Number 616, Some have Claimed Is the Accurate Number of the Beast, instead of 666. The Common Rounded Form... 670,000,000 x .6 x .6 x .6 is also interesting… 144,720,000, because 144 and 72 are Important Biblical Numbers (144,000 Elect and 72 Steps of Jacob’s Ladder to Heaven aka the Stars) 144 Cubits is 216 Feet (6 x 6 x 6) - total garbege and not the slightest connection to NASA, count -16.
11: Saturn’s Hexagonal Pole is a 6 sided, 6 pointed Polygon Representing a Cube Containing 6 Triangles (A Hex), and it is the 6th planet- not the slightest connection to NASA, count -17.
10: A Day is 23 Hours and 56 Minutes, but We Round it to 60 Seconds, 60 Minutes, and 24 Hours (& 2+4 in Numerology is 6), Because Father Time is Saturn aka Cronos (or Crono-logy) the Greco-Roman God of Time, Chaos, and Death- not the slightest connection to NASA, count -18.
09: Kepler’s 3rd Law Calculates a Planet’s Mean Distance From the Sun, giving the Planet’s Orbital Period Raised to the Power of .666666- not the slightest connection to NASA, count -19.
08: On the Globe model, the Distance From the Tip of South America, to the Tip of Africa, is 6,660 Kilometers- not the slightest connection to NASA, count -20.
07: North America is 66.66° Wide on a Globe - from The Furthest Tip to the Other (Key Largo, Florida, to Yesterday Island, Alaska)- not the slightest connection to NASA, count -21.
06: Eurasia On the Globe Model, From the Lighthouse in Cape St. Vincent, Portugal, Straight Across to the other side of the land mass at the Haicang Bridge in China, 6,066 Nautical Miles- not the slightest connection to NASA, count -22.
05: South America, on the Globular Map, From the Northern Most Point to the Southern Most Point, is 66.6° Long, and the Line Passes directly Through the continent’s Highest Peak, Mt. Aconcagua- not the slightest connection to NASA, count -23.
04: On The Globular Map, Africa is 66.6° Wide From its Western Most Point in Dakar to the Easternmost Projection of Somalia. Forming a perfect cross, it is 66.6° High From its Southernmost Point to the Place Where the Line Running due North Hits the Mediterranean, near Benghazi- not the slightest connection to NASA, count -24.
03: The Logos of Both Google’s GPS system through Chrome and CERN, Both of Which Work With NASA, We Find 666 hidden in plain sight- total superstitious garbage, count -25.
02: Switzerland Company Maxon Motors Provided the Electrodrives that Power NASA’s Spirit and Opportunity Rovers on Mars. You can contact them at +41 (41) 666 15 00 by phone or +41 (41) 666 16 16 by Fax- not the slightest connection to NASA, count -26.
01: Earthlings and Life Itself are Made of Carbon, Which has 6 Protons, 6 Neutrons, and 6 Electrons. Revelations 13:16 “And he causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their forehead.” (NASA: Number of man, Bible: Number of A man).- not the slightest connection to NASA, count -30.


Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 24, 2018, 10:54:15 PM
You are so desperate. I believe in Jesus Christ as our Lord and Savior. I see the 666 fingerprint as a key to understanding. If you are so against it, then you should reconsider, in my opinion, but the choice is your own. I will not budge. Jesus is our savior. I know you guys want to associate him with Egyptian solar mythology, but Horus was not crucified. It's a lie. I'm disgusted that so many would promote this Zeitgeist garbarge... I think that's the main thing holding many of you back. And the reason that so many of you would try so hard to fight my numbers. My numbers are correct.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 24, 2018, 10:56:50 PM
Absurd. LiveScience - go TELL THEM that they are lying. They said that the MEAN VELOCITY is 66,600 MPH. Go tell your fellow scientists that they are wrong. These are THEIR numbers, and you are a viper.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rabinoz on January 24, 2018, 10:58:46 PM
If I'm wrong, go ahead. Tell us all what you think about Jesus Christ...
He is the Son of God, but you are trying to mix up your superstitions with Christianity.
Maybe you could read these links for those who mix the Globe Earth~Flat Earth question with the Bible message:
          Flat Earth Myth - More Bogus History (http://www.defendingthebride.com/code/flat.html)
          Creation Ministries International, Who invented the idea of a flat Earth? (http://www.christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c034.html)
          Early Church, Did the Early Church Believe in a Flat Earth? (https://earlychurch.org.uk/creation_flatearth.php)
          The flat earth myth (http://creation.com/flat-earth-myth)
          Christian World View Ministries, The Myth of the Flat Earth Concept (https://www.creationworldview.org/articles_view.asp?id=13)
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 24, 2018, 11:23:27 PM
If I'm wrong, go ahead. Tell us all what you think about Jesus Christ...
He is the Son of God, but you are trying to mix up your superstitions with Christianity.
Maybe you could read these links for those who mix the Globe Earth~Flat Earth question with the Bible message:
          Flat Earth Myth - More Bogus History (http://www.defendingthebride.com/code/flat.html)
          Creation Ministries International, Who invented the idea of a flat Earth? (http://www.christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c034.html)
          Early Church, Did the Early Church Believe in a Flat Earth? (https://earlychurch.org.uk/creation_flatearth.php)
          The flat earth myth (http://creation.com/flat-earth-myth)
          Christian World View Ministries, The Myth of the Flat Earth Concept (https://www.creationworldview.org/articles_view.asp?id=13)


I knew it! You are trying to inundate us with the Zeitgeist! The fact of the matter is that there may be symbolism in Christianity that resembles solar mythology, but that doesn't mean that Christianity is a rip-off of Egypt. Horus was NOT crucified. And Jesus Christ took those symbols and owned them - because they belong to HIM, now and forever. He is the owner of those old symbols, not your "devil-god." Anyway, I'm still waiting for one of you to state how my number of 66,600 MPH is wrong, when it's right. You are a den of vipers and you will not because you know very well that you are a den of vipers, and that is why you will not even TOUCH the subject. So that's that. You know very well that you are not capable of even discussing it.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 24, 2018, 11:27:30 PM
All the solar motifs done, showing the image of Jesus with the sun behind him, are blasphemy. It doesn't mean Jesus is the "Sun" just because the artists rendered him in such a manner.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 24, 2018, 11:32:18 PM
This is witchcraft. And some of you are performing it as we speak. Some of us however, are aware of what you are doing.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 25, 2018, 12:02:55 AM
You're witches!

You said I was wrong about the Earth going around at 66,600 MPH, and you LIED, because that is the mean velocity.

You WILL NOT ADDRESS THAT YOU LIED ABOUT THAT.

You want to go into the trap I set for you all about the other numbers.

We will get to those LATER. It just goes to show to all those watching, that you are a bunch of liars who were TRIGGERED by the Truth, and did everything you could to talk about other things, and to try to say I was making numbers up! What a den of nasty vipers you have become! LOL. Vipers. It's ok. The light of Jesus Christ will shine down on ya! Like it always does! :)
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 25, 2018, 12:08:06 AM
LIARS! That's what you are if you continue to promote the notion that the Earth's mean velocity isn't 66,600 MPH, according to the heliocentric model. PERIOD. If you say otherwise, you need to say it to the scientists, not me. But I suspect you will give them a pass, because you're a liar...
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rvlvr on January 25, 2018, 12:15:06 AM
You said I was wrong about the Earth going around at 66,600 MPH, and you LIED, because that is the mean velocity.
MPH? I use the metric system, am I safe from Pazuzu?

(https://alessandrorossini.org/wp-content/date_format.png)

And is there something in those differing formats that reek of Satanic symmetry?
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 25, 2018, 12:31:24 AM
Yea right, you're gonna see my face soon, and I'm going to challenge you to bring it. But I suspect that I'll be confronted by a big fat coward. You already made it too easy.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rvlvr on January 25, 2018, 12:32:54 AM
Yea right, you're gonna see my face soon, and I'm going to challenge you to bring it. But I suspect that I'll be confronted by a big fat coward. You already made it too easy.
Really? Cool!
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 25, 2018, 12:35:10 AM
You wouldn't dare show your faces. You're snakes.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 25, 2018, 12:37:24 AM
 You can spout all you want here. You wouldn't dare challenge me face to face. Because you know you're liars.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rvlvr on January 25, 2018, 12:39:08 AM
I feel safe and cozy in knowing what you claim is utter rubbish.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 25, 2018, 12:42:37 AM
And most of you are probably nasty little trolls...
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 25, 2018, 12:45:06 AM
I feel safe and cozy in knowing what you claim is utter rubbish.

You are probably sucked into your device and not capable of discussion. Is there one of you who isn't a nasty disgusting looking troll?
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rvlvr on January 25, 2018, 12:50:16 AM
Hey! I've been told I am quite easy on the eyes! And not just by my mom!

Also, my personal super power is I never stink. I can wear a t-shirt for a week, easy, and it still smells clean!
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 25, 2018, 12:52:09 AM
Wouldn't it suck if you were ugly AND dumb? ANYONE?
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rvlvr on January 25, 2018, 12:54:41 AM
I can answer for others.

Yes, it would suck to be ugly and stupid!
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 25, 2018, 12:59:15 AM
Cool. If anyone would like to debate me in person regarding the fraudulent nature of the way the conversation has shifted, I'd be happy to. In person. Otherwise I will just suspect that you are both ugly and dumb. [A Nasty person] See, I'm willing to confront, they are not. If they do, we will exchange information so as to do so immediately. I will not put up with liars. I am willing to face you. Are you? If not, that means you're not willing to face your self.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rvlvr on January 25, 2018, 01:05:09 AM
I have to admit you do not sounds like a person I'd like to have beers with. I am quite sure others feel the same. It means it can prove difficult for you to get to talk to people face to face.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 25, 2018, 01:17:47 AM
Or maybe. You can't show your face because you're a government troll. I dare you to challenge me face to face.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 25, 2018, 01:19:50 AM
Wanna sit here and tell me garbage over the internet without a face... tell me in person. I dare you.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 25, 2018, 01:34:27 AM
See...? You spout off nonsense all day long but when it comes to a face to face challenge you cannot show your face because you know I busted you.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 25, 2018, 01:36:58 AM
You can't risk that I will expose you even more! So just shut your mouth. You know I've checkmated you.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 25, 2018, 01:53:53 AM
Suddenly the trolls disappear, when they are confronted with a face to face opportunity, don't they? SHOCKER! Not. Don't Trust these people! They are liars and can't even discuss the blatant lies on here and then try to change the subject. They will NEVER do a face chat because LIARS hide in the dark.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 25, 2018, 02:00:38 AM
Most of you don't even believe the Earth is flat, and you're pretending. But the evidence seeps out. Pretenders.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: dutchy on January 25, 2018, 02:09:02 AM
You can spout all you want here. You wouldn't dare challenge me face to face. Because you know you're liars.
Don't let them bother you...... numerology is very real.
The secret societies like freemasonry  are using numerology because they happen to know it actually makes sense.
The whole visible world is made of organisms that honor the golden ratio (sunflowers) in an amazing way.
It's hard to wrap your head around the masterpiece this creation really is.

They created a society that believes everything is a mere coincidence and things like numerology and the golden ratio are simply flawed believes of ancient times.
Most hidden societies are well known with the hidden occult powers, numerology and secret math, therefor they use bits of it in the open as demonstration and correspondence.
Like the old freemasons used hidden signs in cathedrals  that only other freemasons could 'read' ..... they still communicate through signs, symbols and more.
Since modern society does not notice the patterns ( like your topic proofs) their correspondence has been increased the last decades.

The sad thing is that those promoting the godless universe themselves are convicted luciferians and understand far more about the real knowledge behind creation than the placebo scientific reality that was created.
Of course they can only redicule, they have to......but i do hope some of them go to a library one day and try to understand what has been known by secret societies for very long.
God and satan are real...... and in the end everyone has to make a choice.

Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Macarios on January 25, 2018, 03:33:34 AM
You are so desperate. I believe in Jesus Christ as our Lord and Savior. I see the 666 fingerprint as a key to understanding. If you are so against it, then you should reconsider, in my opinion, but the choice is your own. I will not budge. Jesus is our savior. I know you guys want to associate him with Egyptian solar mythology, but Horus was not crucified. It's a lie. I'm disgusted that so many would promote this Zeitgeist garbarge... I think that's the main thing holding many of you back. And the reason that so many of you would try so hard to fight my numbers. My numbers are correct.

Jesus Christ lived in time when Earth was already known to be Globe.
Plato, Aristotle, Eratosthenes, Ptolemy and others observed and measured Earth's dimensions.
Jesus didn't flatten it.
Church was adopted as state religion and adapted by Emperor Constantine I.
They created Bible at First Council of Nicaea, 325 AD.
Church also never said the Earth is flat.
(Church did say the Earth was static, until Galileo, Bruno, Copernicus, ... shown it is not. But "static" and "flat" are two different things.)

God is giving us new and better knowledge only when we are ready for it.
Some of us don't accept it and remain in comfort of old one.
"There is no growth in comfort, and no comfort in growth."

What was holding the whole humanity back was thousand years of Christian Dark Ages, but Church, and we all, evolved beyond that.
Why couldn't you?
Please join us in progress.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rabinoz on January 25, 2018, 03:43:40 AM
You can spout all you want here. You wouldn't dare challenge me face to face. Because you know you're liars.
And why wouldn't I dare challenge you face to face. Because I know I am not a liar.

"Judge not that ye be not judged!"

I doubt I've seen many others showing real hate the way you do.

You came here claiming "Most people are familiar with a few of the 666s, like the tilt of the Earth, but I searched all of NASA's data and 'maths', for weeks and maybe even months, and I found that it comes up like a fingerprint - 33 times!"

But very few items in your list have the slightest connection with NASA, with was started in 1958, I believe.

Then most of you 666s are the result of very artificially choosing "suitable" units.
You use English/American units, but many of the values you claim to give 666s were originally determined in quite different units.
Yet the early Greeks measured distances in stadia, the early Muslim surveyors used Arabic miles and many different units used in early Europe.

So really, just who is being deceptive here?
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Crutchwater on January 25, 2018, 03:54:46 AM
Couple things...

The Earth isn't flat,
There really is no god,
There really is no Satan,
The number of the beast is just a number,
Capitalizing a proper noun doesn't really confirm belief in an entity.
You may be a paranoid delusional,
NASA Rocks!
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: dutchy on January 25, 2018, 04:02:37 AM
Couple things...

The Earth isn't flat,
There really is no god,
There really is no Satan,
The number of the beast is just a number,
Capitalizing a proper noun doesn't really confirm belief in an entity.
You may be a paranoid delusional,
NASA Rocks!
I know you believe in McGod !!
And it's obvious that the ingredients they put into a burger are damaging for the brains.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rvlvr on January 25, 2018, 04:09:28 AM
I guess this thread is as good as any for this link.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/01/rocket-lab-launched-a-secret-payload-into-space-last-weekend/ (https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/01/rocket-lab-launched-a-secret-payload-into-space-last-weekend/)
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rabinoz on January 25, 2018, 04:30:39 AM
I knew it! You are trying to inundate us with the Zeitgeist! The fact of the matter is that there may be symbolism in Christianity that resembles solar mythology, but that doesn't mean that Christianity is a rip-off of Egypt. Horus was NOT crucified. And Jesus Christ took those symbols and owned them - because they belong to HIM, now and forever. He is the owner of those old symbols, not your "devil-god." Anyway, I'm still waiting for one of you to state how my number of 66,600 MPH is wrong, when it's right. You are a den of vipers and you will not because you know very well that you are a den of vipers, and that is why you will not even TOUCH the subject. So that's that. You know very well that you are not capable of even discussing it.
Where did I say anything that caused that irrational outburst? How can I be "trying to inundate us with the Zeitgeist" when I have no idea what Zeitgeist even is. 

I won't even touch the subject because I've no idea what you're saying most of the time, you're totally irrational.

In Australia we'd say that you're a few 'roos short in the top paddock - though in your case it's a whole mob of big white boomers!

I have not the slightest idea what you are talking about, but since you totally ignore my arguments, I guess I should ignore you!
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: EvolvedMantisShrimp on January 25, 2018, 04:33:09 AM
You can't risk that I will expose you even more! So just shut your mouth. You know I've checkmated you.

I like you. You're silly.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: dutchy on January 25, 2018, 04:45:48 AM
I guess this thread is as good as any for this link.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/01/rocket-lab-launched-a-secret-payload-into-space-last-weekend/ (https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/01/rocket-lab-launched-a-secret-payload-into-space-last-weekend/)
Fake !!!!!! CGI !!!!!!! Payed shills !!!!! Project blue beam !!!!!
Hahahahahaha
Since every scientist still claim we went to the moon and control a rover on mars ( without Adam Stelzner knowing HOW) is reason enough to dismiss any claims about orbiting human constructs in space.
When they are able to convince humans about the absurd, those same humans will just about believe everything ... and while gazing upwards will ‘see’ whatever they think they see. Stars, no stars, UFO’s, the ISS, tiny lights, balloons........
Many insiders have seen UFO’s and confirm aliens have visited us.Even former Apollo astronaut Edgar Mitchell has claimed Roswell techniques are used by the government since the early fifties .

Bottom line, i have no intention to look upwards, because i can draw no conclusion whatsoever about what is really ‘up’ there..... and it seems everyone is of another opinion !
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rvlvr on January 25, 2018, 04:52:38 AM
Bottom line, i have no intention to look upwards, because i can draw no conclusion whatsoever about what is really ‘up’ there..... and it seems everyone is of another opinion !
Rrright. Better keep at it, then.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: EvolvedMantisShrimp on January 25, 2018, 05:05:04 AM

Bottom line, i have no intention to look upwards, because i can draw no conclusion whatsoever about what is really ‘up’ there..... and it seems everyone is of another opinion !

Of course you don't. That would indicate intellectual honesty and scientific curiosity.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: dutchy on January 25, 2018, 05:26:22 AM

Bottom line, i have no intention to look upwards, because i can draw no conclusion whatsoever about what is really ‘up’ there..... and it seems everyone is of another opinion !

Of course you don't. That would indicate intellectual honesty and scientific curiosity.
Honesty is that all money spend on space nonsense could have been used to distribute fresh water all around the globe by a clever pipeline and even better techniques, so that every local can at least be sure of a reasonable successfull harvest each year.

Scientific curiosity is the psychological analysis why people still haven't invested in such a water network on earth, but rather go to hell hole mars to see if there is water !!!!!!!!!!!!

Gazing upwards is like a drug........ you forget your duties as human species and can fantasise about any dream 'up there'.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: JimmyTheCrab on January 25, 2018, 05:38:41 AM
Wouldn't it suck if you were ugly AND dumb?
It's good to see you here spreading Christ's message of forgiveness and understanding.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: EvolvedMantisShrimp on January 25, 2018, 05:55:22 AM

Bottom line, i have no intention to look upwards, because i can draw no conclusion whatsoever about what is really ‘up’ there..... and it seems everyone is of another opinion !

Of course you don't. That would indicate intellectual honesty and scientific curiosity.
Honesty is that all money spend on space nonsense could have been used to distribute fresh water all around the globe by a clever pipeline and even better techniques, so that every local can at least be sure of a reasonable successfull harvest each year.

Scientific curiosity is the psychological analysis why people still haven't invested in such a water network on earth, but rather go to hell hole mars to see if there is water !!!!!!!!!!!!

Gazing upwards is like a drug........ you forget your duties as human species and can fantasise about any dream 'up there'.

Scientific curiosity is the reason we don't have an average life expectancy of 35. It's the reason most people who have access to clean water do. It's the reason we're having this conversation.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: SpaceCadet on January 25, 2018, 06:25:36 AM
For someone who claims to love Jesus, you sure do have a lot of bile, vile words and hate coming off of you.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: markjo on January 25, 2018, 06:37:29 AM
Couple things...

The Earth isn't flat,
There really is no god,
There really is no Satan,
The number of the beast is just a number,
Capitalizing a proper noun doesn't really confirm belief in an entity.
You may be a paranoid delusional,
NASA Rocks!
FYI, if you're going to capitalize proper nouns, then you should also capitalize God, regardless of whether you believe in Him or not.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: dutchy on January 25, 2018, 06:49:17 AM

Bottom line, i have no intention to look upwards, because i can draw no conclusion whatsoever about what is really ‘up’ there..... and it seems everyone is of another opinion !

Of course you don't. That would indicate intellectual honesty and scientific curiosity.
Honesty is that all money spend on space nonsense could have been used to distribute fresh water all around the globe by a clever pipeline and even better techniques, so that every local can at least be sure of a reasonable successfull harvest each year.

Scientific curiosity is the psychological analysis why people still haven't invested in such a water network on earth, but rather go to hell hole mars to see if there is water !!!!!!!!!!!!

Gazing upwards is like a drug........ you forget your duties as human species and can fantasise about any dream 'up there'.

Scientific curiosity is the reason we don't have an average life expectancy of 35. It's the reason most people who have access to clean water do. It's the reason we're having this conversation.
Scientific dishonesty means we have no excuse whatsoever why water isn't distributed around earth, all resources are shared, medicine is for free and ''we are the world'' is more than an excuse used by some pop idols to create yet another platform.

And let's not speak of what we do and do to the wildlife during large scale deforestation and the mass murdering for outragious consumption of meat in the western world...plastic in the seas...and more.....
When will the scientific community show some curioustity in how to solve and distribute earth's shortages and resources ?
Or is making an A-bomb, going to the moon and mars...simply so much more excitement that satisfies the type of curiosity we exhibit ?
I think the answer is a big fat YES...we suck at understanding what our real puppose on earth is..........
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Crutchwater on January 25, 2018, 07:13:19 AM
Quote from: dutchy
... damaging for the brains.

I'm not the stupid fuck who thinks the Earth is flat, and that every space agency is %100 lies...

So, you can suck the McCock, ya paranoid little man.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Curiouser and Curiouser on January 25, 2018, 07:31:42 AM
Tell us all what you think about Jesus Christ...
Jesus had a really bad weekend for our sins.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Denspressure on January 25, 2018, 07:49:22 AM
What's his name here? The one with the red snake for his logo... who I proved to be totally wrong... Actually cut and pasted a part of what I said but not the whole thing as if it actually mattered. So if it's 666.1, instead? It doesn't matter! It's still a 666, and you didn't even acknowledge that you LIED. You said the speed of sound, blah blah blah, but didn't answer that I called you out on your LIE. You claimed the Earth was going at 67,111 MPH, and I used a different Scientific Literature that shows the mean velocity at 66,600, and you IGNORED that you LIED. You are a deceiver, and guess what? Nobody is buying it! You're a liar!
Do post the source which edidyouknow used for their article on Earth's orbital speed.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: markjo on January 25, 2018, 08:51:52 AM
Scientific dishonesty means we have no excuse whatsoever why water isn't distributed around earth, all resources are shared, medicine is for free and ''we are the world'' is more than an excuse used by some pop idols to create yet another platform.

And let's not speak of what we do and do to the wildlife during large scale deforestation and the mass murdering for outragious consumption of meat in the western world...plastic in the seas...and more.....
When will the scientific community show some curioustity in how to solve and distribute earth's shortages and resources ?
Or is making an A-bomb, going to the moon and mars...simply so much more excitement that satisfies the type of curiosity we exhibit ?
I think the answer is a big fat YES...we suck at understanding what our real puppose on earth is..........
Please don't confuse science with economics or politics.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: dutchy on January 25, 2018, 11:58:57 AM
Scientific dishonesty means we have no excuse whatsoever why water isn't distributed around earth, all resources are shared, medicine is for free and ''we are the world'' is more than an excuse used by some pop idols to create yet another platform.

And let's not speak of what we do and do to the wildlife during large scale deforestation and the mass murdering for outragious consumption of meat in the western world...plastic in the seas...and more.....
When will the scientific community show some curioustity in how to solve and distribute earth's shortages and resources ?
Or is making an A-bomb, going to the moon and mars...simply so much more excitement that satisfies the type of curiosity we exhibit ?
I think the answer is a big fat YES...we suck at understanding what our real puppose on earth is..........
Please don't confuse science with economics or politics.
Uhhhh...then why does every globeling claims ''outstanding scientist this...'' ''the whole scientific community that..''...as if they are an independent genuine group of people ?
It seems this so called ''scientific community'' has no problems in develloping A-bombs knowing they can only kill on a huge scale.......
Politicians are to dumb to create anything at all other than to guide certain political processes.And the large companies are to greedy to invent anything but models that benefits themselves.

If scientist are so gullible to invent ''death and destruction'' for assholes like politicians and big companies, then it is no strech whatsoever than you can manupilate this so called scientific community in every thinkable way.
The latest example :

The device that detected a gravitational wave the length of 1/1000 of a proton's diameter was rewarded with the nobel price.
The device that measured a particle exceeding the speed of light was dismissed due to a supposed measurement irregularity !!

The former supports our current cosmic manure...the latter throws Einstein's GR in the trashcan.....

If only the scientific community would present rightious and noble men and women.........problem is they are full of men and women that can be pressurised in any direction imaginable.
And i think i skip the NAZI rocket scientists that should be before an international war tribunal instead of a fancy office at NASA this time around, because all of you will complain i am a NASAphobic..again.
And i will try to minimise my anti NASA rebutals if that makes you all happy....... ;D
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: dutchy on January 25, 2018, 12:07:20 PM
Quote from: dutchy
... damaging for the brains.

I'm not the stupid fuck who thinks the Earth is flat, and that every space agency is %100 lies...

So, you can suck the McCock, ya paranoid little man.
Your burgers are full of bull's cocks...you know that don't you ?
Partly meat, partly mashed cocks, organs, and other trash from the bull....McDonalds will recycle everything now that they have become ''green'' ! Less waiste,....same taste

Think about that tomorrow when you eat your daily burger little green man.........sorry for the pun,....but it is way to easy to make fun of your simpleminded take on today's society !
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Alpha2Omega on January 25, 2018, 04:11:39 PM
Scientific dishonesty means we have no excuse whatsoever why water isn't distributed around earth, all resources are shared, medicine is for free and ''we are the world'' is more than an excuse used by some pop idols to create yet another platform.

And let's not speak of what we do and do to the wildlife during large scale deforestation and the mass murdering for outragious consumption of meat in the western world...plastic in the seas...and more.....
When will the scientific community show some curioustity in how to solve and distribute earth's shortages and resources ?
Or is making an A-bomb, going to the moon and mars...simply so much more excitement that satisfies the type of curiosity we exhibit ?
I think the answer is a big fat YES...we suck at understanding what our real puppose on earth is..........
Please don't confuse science with economics or politics.
Uhhhh...then why does every globeling claims ''outstanding scientist this...'' ''the whole scientific community that..''...as if they are an independent genuine group of people ?

Non-sequitur.

Quote
It seems this so called ''scientific community'' has no problems in develloping A-bombs knowing they can only kill on a huge scale.......

The A-bomb was developed during and because of World War II. You may not be familiar with it, but at that particular time a lot of resources were being poured into technology for the purpose of killing on a huge scale. You might want to check on the "no problems" assertion if you decide to look into it.

Quote
Politicians are to dumb to create anything at all other than to guide certain political processes.

That thought may have some merit.

Quote
And the large companies are [too] greedy to invent anything but models that benefits themselves.

This in not true. Obviously, commercial businesses ultimately operate for their own benefit (or hope to), but to be successful they invent, develop, and manufacture things that benefit others. Mobile drilling rigs, drilling bits and pipe, completion equipment and techniques, and water treatment processes, equipment, and supplies providing clean water for many people is just one example.

Some businesses do nothing more than develop schemes that benefit only themselves, but these are  typically exposed as fraudulent, or simply fail under their own weight, often in short order.

Quote
If scientist are so gullible to invent ''death and destruction'' for assholes like politicians and big companies, then it is no strech whatsoever than you can manupilate this so called scientific community in every thinkable way.
The latest example :

The device that detected a gravitational wave the length of 1/1000 of a proton's diameter was rewarded with the [Nobel Prize].
The device that measured a particle exceeding the speed of light was dismissed due to a supposed measurement irregularity !!

The former supports our current cosmic manure...the latter throws Einstein's GR in the trashcan.....

There were errors in the latter. They should get a prize anyway? How is this manipulation?

Quote
If only the scientific community would present rightious and noble men and women.........problem is they are full of men and women that can be pressurised in any direction imaginable.

Gosh... it sounds like scientists might be actual people after all! Who would ever have expected that?

Quote
And i think i skip the NAZI rocket scientists that should be before an international war tribunal instead of a fancy office at NASA this time around, because all of you will complain i am a NASAphobic..again.
And i will try to minimise my anti NASA rebutals if that makes you all happy....... ;D

You failed at that, too.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Alpha2Omega on January 25, 2018, 04:14:45 PM
Your burgers are full of bull's cocks...you know that don't you ?
Partly meat, partly mashed cocks, organs, and other trash from the bull....McDonalds will recycle everything now that they have become ''green'' ! Less waiste,....same taste

Think about that tomorrow when you eat your daily burger little green man.........sorry for the pun,....but it is way to easy to make fun of your simpleminded take on today's society !

My goodness! So angry! If you're frustrated because your arguments get nowhere, maybe you should consider better arguments.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rabinoz on January 25, 2018, 04:15:13 PM
Let's look at this post again in the "cold (it's sure not cold here) hard light of day".
Mind you, I don't know why I bother to even write this as you take no notice of anyone else's thoughts.

You are so desperate. I believe in Jesus Christ as our Lord and Savior.
No argument there.

Quote from: Aophos
I see the 666 fingerprint as a key to understanding. If you are so against it, then you should reconsider, in my opinion, but the choice is your own. I will not budge. Jesus is our savior. I know you guys want to associate him with Egyptian solar mythology,
But, just who is "to associate him with Egyptian solar mythology"? You brought that in not I, nor anyone else.

Quote from: Aophos
but Horus was not crucified. It's a lie. I'm disgusted that so many would promote this Zeitgeist garbarge... I think that's the main thing holding many of you back. And the reason that so many of you would try so hard to fight my numbers.
Who here suggested that "Horus was not crucified"? Nobody! And you talk of "Zeitgeist garbarge" - I had no idea what you meant till I looked it up, but:
Quote
zeitgeist
noun
the defining spirit or mood of a particular period of history as shown by the ideas and beliefs of the time.
You talk of "the ideas and beliefs of the time", but if you mean the shape of the earth, the Western and Middle Eastern world seems to have believed the earth to be a globe for millenia.
The early Church certainly seems to accept that the earth was a Globe without question. Just look up the writings of:
The 13th century Iohannes de Sacrobosco (a French scholar, monk and astronomer) wrote his treatise "De Sphaera" on the spheres, the earth and the celestial. He wrote
Quote
THE EARTH A SPHERE. -- That the earth, too, is round is shown thus. The signs and stars do not rise and set the same for all men everywhere but rise and set sooner for those in the east than for those in the west; and of this there is no other cause than the bulge of the earth. Moreover, celestial phenomena evidence that they rise sooner for Orientals than for westerners. For one and the same eclipse of the moon which appears to us in the first hour of the night appears to Orientals about the third hour of the night, which proves that they had night and sunset before we did, of which setting the bulge of the earth is the cause.
"De Sphaera"  was regarded as one of the most definitive treatments of Ptolemaic cosmology. Iohannes de Sacrobosco most assuredly believed the earth to be a Globe and with very distant sun, moon and stars.

Or the earlier work by the English monk Bede (c. 672–735), who wrote in his influential treatise on computus, The Reckoning of Time, that the Earth was round. He explained the unequal length of daylight from "the roundness of the Earth, for not without reason is it called 'the orb of the world' on the pages of Holy Scripture and of ordinary literature. It is, in fact, set like a sphere in the middle of the whole universe." (De temporum ratione,). The large number of surviving manuscripts of The Reckoning of Time, copied to meet the Carolingian requirement that all priests should study the computus, indicates that many, if not most, priests were exposed to the idea of the sphericity of the Earth.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bede was lucid about earth's sphericity, writing "We call the earth a globe, not as if the shape of a sphere were expressed in the diversity of plains and mountains, but because, if all things are included in the outline, the earth's circumference will represent the figure of a perfect globe... For truly it is an orb placed in the centre of the universe; in its width it is like a circle, and not circular like a shield but rather like a ball, and it extends from its centre with perfect roundness on all sides."
From: Spherical Earth (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_Earth)

Mind you, I don't know why I bother to even write this as you take no notice of anyone else's thoughts.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rabinoz on January 25, 2018, 04:30:59 PM
Let's look your OP again:
Most people are familiar with a few of the 666s, like the tilt of the Earth, but I searched all of NASA's data and "maths," for weeks and maybe even months, and I found that it comes up like a fingerprint - 33 times!

I posted it to IFERS, and was immediately banned. Like, why? Anyway he sounds exactly like Marilyn Manson or any other Satanist with videos like "Jesus Never Existed!" and then saying "Don't be turned off by the title!" Are you freaking kidding me?

My numbers are correct.
Sure many of your numbers might be correct, but most have nothing at all to do with your nemesis NASA.
Most of the others so artificially depend on the units chosen, that in the opinion any reasonable person they are meaningless!

So let's look again at one or two to show what I mean:
That is the rock bottom of stupidity!
Honestly, the closer I look at your OP the more flabberghasted I get!

I guess you blame NASA for destroying your nice pretty flat earth (that doesn't work)!
But NASA didn't do it! They have an alibi - they were not there and the earth never was flat!
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: ER22 on January 25, 2018, 04:41:42 PM
Your burgers are full of bull's cocks...you know that don't you ?
Partly meat, partly mashed cocks, organs, and other trash from the bull....McDonalds will recycle everything now that they have become ''green'' ! Less waiste,....same taste

Think about that tomorrow when you eat your daily burger little green man.........sorry for the pun,....but it is way to easy to make fun of your simpleminded take on today's society !

My goodness! So angry! If you're frustrated because your arguments get nowhere, maybe you should consider better arguments.

Seems to be hung up on male genitalia as well...
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: dutchy on January 25, 2018, 11:50:03 PM
Your burgers are full of bull's cocks...you know that don't you ?
Partly meat, partly mashed cocks, organs, and other trash from the bull....McDonalds will recycle everything now that they have become ''green'' ! Less waiste,....same taste

Think about that tomorrow when you eat your daily burger little green man.........sorry for the pun,....but it is way to easy to make fun of your simpleminded take on today's society !

My goodness! So angry! If you're frustrated because your arguments get nowhere, maybe you should consider better arguments.

Seems to be hung up on male genitalia as well...
See ? my post was a reaction to the green guy who said i could suck the McCock !!!
He loves McDonalds so it is a theme between us......

But what happens ? Two globelings forget the whole context and accuse me for being angree and hung up to genitalia, while my post was a simple answer to the green man's 'suck the McCock'

And you wonder why they could so easily indoctrinate you from youth ???
Every detail escapes you completely, no nuance whatsoever, just blindly following your masters and accuse flatearthers for no reason at all......and defend the likes of 'here to laugh at you'
Thank you both for displaying your true characters once again !!
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 26, 2018, 01:06:13 AM
The Earth is FLAT. And the number 666 is a fingerprint that keeps "popping up," coincidentally. You can move your numbers around to be exacting, but the point is, they constantly use that number as "examples." For instance, NASA says that "Mercury is 666 times brighter than Earth from the Sun using the inverse square law." Why not use Venus instead? The reason they presented Mercury, instead of ANY OTHER planet, is because they need to TELL YOU that they are Satanists. It's a psychopathic trait, like we see all the time with serial killers and the clues they leave behind. My numbers are correct. I'm not budging.

The first guy, red snake, said the Earth was revolving at 67,111, while my video is correct, the mean velocity is 66,600. He either lied, or was ignorant. Therefore, I suggest that he not be taken seriously, whatsoever. You guys wanna talk about burgers and distract from the math. Anyone who knows the Earth is flat can refute you very simply. Another guy, stated that the tip of S. America, to the tip of S. Africa is not 6,066 miles, but instead 6, 027 miles, because he moved his pointer from the tip to the middle of the nearest city. It's like this with all of you guys who want to claim I'm lying with your misrepresentation of the math trying to get away with lies. You know what you're doing, or you're not smart. A third guy said that I need to get a calculator, that 100 minus 23 is 76.6, not 66.6, but a circle has 360 degrees, and divided by 4 is 90, not 100. My numbers are correct, I'm not budging. I will not be lectured by liars and deceivers in a den infested by vipers. The obviousness of the pathetic attempt to discredit the math is profusely absurd, and will not be tolerated.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rabinoz on January 26, 2018, 01:08:47 AM
It seems this so called ''scientific community'' has no problems in develloping A-bombs knowing they can only kill on a huge scale.......
And non A-bombs and other war technology are pretty deadly and very dirty too.
Quote
World War II casualties
World War II was the deadliest military conflict in history in absolute terms of total casualties. Over 60 million people were killed, which was about 3% of the 1940 world population (est. 2.3 billion). Statistics of military wounded are available for the major combatants. The tables below give a detailed country-by-country count of human losses. World War II fatality statistics vary, with estimates of total deaths ranging from 50 million to more than 80 million.[2] The higher figure of over 80 million includes deaths from war-related disease and famine. Civilians killed totalled 50 to 55 million, including 19 to 28 million from war-related disease and famine. Military deaths from all causes totalled 21 to 25 million, including deaths in captivity of about 5 million prisoners of war. Statistics on the number of military wounded are included whenever available.

From: World War II casualties (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties)
Your Netherlands (with 8,729,000 population had 6,700 militar and 700 civilian deaths) had very many civilian deaths,  Australia (with 6,968,000 population had 39,700 military and 700 civilian deaths) and New Zealand (with 1,629,000 population had 11,700 military and no civilian deaths) had high military deaths, but few civilian deaths.

Yes, nuclear weapons are terrible but
       Japan had 2,120,000 military and 2,600,000-3,100,000 civilian deaths.
And of those,
        90,000–146,000 died in Hiroshima, with about half on the first day and
        39,000–80,000 died in Nagasaki, again about half on the first day.
The A-bombs were horrendous, but were a small part of even Japan's total deaths.
We will never know if the A-bomb shortened the war much nor whether they reduced or added to the total casualties.

War is terrible, but what would suggest that Britain, Australia, New Zealand and the US should have done in 1939 and 1941?
Leave Poland, Norway, the rest Europe and Russia to be devastated by Germsny in Europe and by Japan in the Pacific?

I guess that with your hatred of all things American, you will say that the USA should have stayed out of it and left the Netherlands under the control of the NAZIS.




Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 26, 2018, 01:15:54 AM
For someone who claims to love Jesus, you sure do have a lot of bile, vile words and hate coming off of you.

Jesus was not nice. He called the Synagogue of Satan (The Rabbis) a Den of Vipers. He kicked over the tables of the money-changers and started a war. Who ever said that Jesus was nice? Nice doesn't work when dealing with liars.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 26, 2018, 01:26:43 AM
I didn't read everything Rabinoz said, because it's clearly NONSENSE, but one thing that struck out was when he said:

26: Astro-Notnaut Peggy Whitson Spent 666 Days in Space
Bingo, it's connected with NASA, but so what?

So what?! Are you fucking kidding me?! Your attempt at belittlement is pathetic. It DOES matter. What is the point of spending that exact number of days in "space," and it was planned... Get real.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 26, 2018, 01:30:16 AM
Then he said: These are totally meaningless statements - so let's forget them!

30: The Speed of Sound is 666 Knots Per Second
29: The Force of Gravity on Earth is 666 Newtons
28: The Curvature of A Square Mile is .666 Feet... in 10 Miles: 66.6 Ft... in 20 Miles: 266.6 Ft... 40M: 1,066.6 Ft... 50M: 1,666 Ft… 70M: 3,266.6 Ft… 80M: 4,266.6 Ft… 100M: 6,666.6Ft… The Heliocentric Curvature Math is Based on 666


Are you out of your mind? They are not meaningless just because you said so... I'm not arguing with someone like you and not granting you any more address, because you are clearly delusional. You can't just dismiss something because you say so as though it doesn't mean anything. That's ridiculous and absurd.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: dutchy on January 26, 2018, 01:33:17 AM
It seems this so called ''scientific community'' has no problems in develloping A-bombs knowing they can only kill on a huge scale.......
And non A-bombs and other war technology are pretty deadly and very dirty too.
Quote
World War II casualties
World War II was the deadliest military conflict in history in absolute terms of total casualties. Over 60 million people were killed, which was about 3% of the 1940 world population (est. 2.3 billion). Statistics of military wounded are available for the major combatants. The tables below give a detailed country-by-country count of human losses. World War II fatality statistics vary, with estimates of total deaths ranging from 50 million to more than 80 million.[2] The higher figure of over 80 million includes deaths from war-related disease and famine. Civilians killed totalled 50 to 55 million, including 19 to 28 million from war-related disease and famine. Military deaths from all causes totalled 21 to 25 million, including deaths in captivity of about 5 million prisoners of war. Statistics on the number of military wounded are included whenever available.

From: World War II casualties (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties)
Your Netherlands (with 8,729,000 population had 6,700 militar and 700 civilian deaths) had very many civilian deaths,  Australia (with 6,968,000 population had 39,700 military and 700 civilian deaths) and New Zealand (with 1,629,000 population had 11,700 military and no civilian deaths) had high military deaths, but few civilian deaths.

Yes, nuclear weapons are terrible but
       Japan had 2,120,000 military and 2,600,000-3,100,000 civilian deaths.
And of those,
        90,000–146,000 died in Hiroshima, with about half on the first day and
        39,000–80,000 died in Nagasaki, again about half on the first day.
The A-bombs were horrendous, but were a small part of even Japan's total deaths.
We will never know if the A-bomb shortened the war much nor whether they reduced or added to the total casualties.

War is terrible, but what would suggest that Britain, Australia, New Zealand and the US should have done in 1939 and 1941?
Leave Poland, Norway, the rest Europe and Russia to be devastated by Germsny in Europe and by Japan in the Pacific?

I guess that with your hatred of all things American, you will say that the USA should have stayed out of it and left the Netherlands under the control of the NAZIS.
Hi Rabinoz, once again you don’t fail to amaze me....
I simply said that scientists, like other humans, can be manipulated in whatever the rulers of this current world want.
Contrary to false claims that indicate that scientists all over the world are some independent group that has agreed upon only doing objectieve and neutral science.
They do whatever they are ordered to do....like the rest of us

No it wasn’t about the USA nor politics. You have clearly earned some vacation RAB.......i don’t mind a hard confrontation, but your last post is really to much to handle ...... so much bias....
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 26, 2018, 01:53:42 AM
03: The Logos of Both Google’s GPS system through Chrome and CERN, Both of Which Work With NASA, We Find 666 hidden in plain sight
;D ;D ;D ;D We Find 666 hidden in plain sight  ;D ;D ;D ;D
Oh, really!


Yes. Really. You really are a serpent-kind of individual to question something so blatant. That kind of self-doubt indoctrination... it doesn't work anymore. It's over for you guys. We know. We are the future. You are the past.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 26, 2018, 01:57:59 AM
The only reason that you nay-sayers are here... is because you are government shills. Normal people are just trying to figure it out - but YOU, are triggered. All of you who get on these forums and constantly attack, are just a bunch of trolls. Nobody else would try SO hard to defend the Globe. You are making it obvious that you are DESPERATE. And we are going to destroy you. Your psychological crap doesn't work on us.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 26, 2018, 02:04:32 AM
It's non-stop. Why are you even here? At the epi-center? You are here to use trolling techniques. Normal people don't expose that they have an agenda to discredit and belittle every single little thing that a pro-flat Earther says. You guys are here attacking EVERY SINGLE LITTLE POST that a Flat-Earther makes. That makes it blatantly obvious that you have an agenda and a reason for always being here obsessively and it's pathetic, or it's an operation. Normal people just think about it. You guys make it a point to attack anyone who exposes it at every single little thing they say, and it's psychological. But we're privy. We know what you're doing, and it isn't going to work anymore.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 26, 2018, 02:10:49 AM
You are damage control. And you need to be fired.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rvlvr on January 26, 2018, 02:12:33 AM
It's non-stop. Why are you even here? At the epi-center? You are here to use trolling techniques. Normal people don't expose that they have an agenda to discredit and belittle every single little thing that a pro-flat Earther says. You guys are here attacking EVERY SINGLE LITTLE POST that a Flat-Earther makes. That makes it blatantly obvious that you have an agenda and a reason for always being here obsessively and it's pathetic, or it's an operation. Normal people just think about it. You guys make it a point to attack anyone who exposes it at every single little thing they say, and it's psychological. But we're privy. We know what you're doing, and it isn't going to work anymore.
What do you think the "normal people" think when they see what you have been writing? Do you teach people of all the 666s of NASA in real life, too?
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 26, 2018, 02:42:22 AM
The Bible teaches us through the words of Jesus Christ - if you want to know what kind of seed you have, plant it, and it's fruits shall be known. The fruitage of this "tree" is that of discord. The normal people say WOW. They certainly don't get on here all day long and attack every single little thing that a Flat Earther says. That's NOT normal. It doesn't matter if what the Flat-Earther says is something big or small, numerical or grammatical, you guys will be right there to twist it into something negative and to make us question ourselves (that is precisely what your question is intended to do), because you know that we are aware of the Truth. You cannot stop this. The cat is out of the bag and it is over.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rvlvr on January 26, 2018, 02:50:49 AM
I disagree. I am 100% certain Earth will not prove to be flat, and what you write here will be dismissed by said "normal people" as drivel not worth paying attention to.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Crutchwater on January 26, 2018, 03:11:53 AM

But what happens ? Two globelings forget the whole context and accuse me for being angree and hung up to genitalia, while my post was a simple answer to the green man's 'suck the McCock'

You want to talk context, you paranoid piece of shit? Do you?

This McDonalds bullshit started when I said something like " dutchy can't even load the napkin dispenser correctly at his McDonalds job".
YOU are the dumbass that took the context ball and ran with it, assuming (incorrectly) that I "love McDonalds" and eat hamburgers constantly.
Yes, I do love a good hamburger. No, I do not eat McDonalds hamburgers often, in fact, rarely.

Now that you have that straight, go back to sucking your tofu sausage you stupid little man.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rvlvr on January 26, 2018, 03:17:58 AM
Hey! What's with all this McDonald's hate! Just grabbed a few cheese burgers. Hit the spot, and cheap.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Crutchwater on January 26, 2018, 03:30:40 AM
Hey! What's with all this McDonald's hate! Just grabbed a few cheese burgers. Hit the spot, and cheap.

no hate on my part, I just don't frequent the establishment.
My burgers are usually homemade, from venison, that I kill and process myself. I shot 5 this last season, so I have a freezer full!

dutchy is afraid of meat... he only eats organic free range gluten free tube steaks!
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rvlvr on January 26, 2018, 03:35:37 AM
Never tried a venison burger, although we do get a lot of moose/elk here. Pretty sure it'd taste great!
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rabinoz on January 26, 2018, 03:54:23 AM
The Earth is FLAT. And the number 666 is a fingerprint that keeps "popping up," coincidentally. You can move your numbers around to be exacting, but the point is, they constantly use that number as "examples." For instance, NASA says that "Mercury is 666 times brighter than Earth from the Sun using the inverse square law."
Why not use Venus instead?
I imagine NASA uses Mercury as the example simply because it is closest to the Sun, so gives the largest number.

Quote from: Aophos
The reason they presented Mercury, instead of ANY OTHER planet, is because they need to TELL YOU that they are Satanists.
No, it is not.

NASA says, "Mercury is at 0.387 AUs. 1/d^2 = 1/0.387^2 = 1/.15 = 666.67%, almost seven times brighter! We can use this method to compare any spot in the Universe if we describe its distance as compared to Earth relative to the Sun."
So,
NASA does not say  "Mercury is 666 times brighter than Earth from the Sun using the inverse square law."
But NASA does say, "Mercury is at . . . . . . . 666.67%, almost seven times brighter!"

Quite a difference, wouldn't you agree? You claim 666 times, NASA claims 666.67%, which rounds to 667% or 6.67.

But, I still can't work out what you and so many others have against NASA. They were not the ones that started the "Globe" idea, that dates back thousands of years.
As I wrote before even the most in the early Church seemed to accept the Globe as the shape of the earth.
But you claim to know better than the 13th century French scholar, monk and astronomer, Iohannes de Sacrobosco and the English monk and astronomer, the Venerable Bede (c. 672–735), who wrote in his influential treatise on computus, The Reckoning of Time, that the
Quote
Earth was round. He explained the unequal length of daylight from "the roundness of the Earth, for not without reason is it called 'the orb of the world' on the pages of Holy Scripture and of ordinary literature. It is, in fact, set like a sphere in the middle of the whole universe." (De temporum ratione,). The large number of surviving manuscripts of The Reckoning of Time, copied to meet the Carolingian requirement that all priests should study the computus, indicates that many, if not most, priests were exposed to the idea of the sphericity of the Earth.

Still, you know more than everybody else and take no notice of anything anyone else says.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Macarios on January 26, 2018, 04:05:38 AM
Hey! What's with all this McDonald's hate! Just grabbed a few cheese burgers. Hit the spot, and cheap.

Burger King bigger, tastier, and cheaper (at least cheaper in Clemmons and Winston-Salem). :-)

"Are McDonald's burgers better than Burger King's?"
Here people say "no": http://www.debate.org/opinions/are-mac-donalds-burgers-better-than-burger-kings (http://www.debate.org/opinions/are-mac-donalds-burgers-better-than-burger-kings).

But I rarely take either.
For some time I liked Little Caesar's $5 pizza with pepperoni, or their Crazy Bread sticks. Deep Dish was also good.

Lately was taking frozen pizza from Walmart.
Sam's Choice rising crust Three Meat or Supreme, Great Value rising or thin crust - 20 minutes at 400 degrees and eat all day.
When gets cold you can put some mayo on top (not needed while hot).

See, even I know Earth is not like pizza, I still like pizza "little more than melons".
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: markjo on January 26, 2018, 06:24:44 AM
Why do people keep assuming that 666 is a bad number?
Quote from: http://www.ask-angels.com/spiritual-guidance/666-meaning/
What Does 666 Mean?

Seeing 666 does carry a message, but it's not ominous or foreboding like you might initially think. 666 most often appears as a spiritual wake up call from the angels!

Have you been solely focused on material matters, and ignoring your inner voice and spiritual path? If so , it's quite likely 666 may appear with a message for you. 666 brings the guidance to listen to your heart not your head.

Again, it's not a bad omen… It simply brings the message that you're a bit too focused within the illusions of the material plane. Quiet your mind, open your heart, and tune into your intuition and the guidance and wisdom of your soul and spirit.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: dutchy on January 26, 2018, 06:49:33 AM
You want to talk context, you paranoid piece of shit? Do you?
Sure !! i am waiting......
Quote
This McDonalds bullshit started when I said something like " dutchy can't even load the napkin dispenser correctly at his McDonalds job".
YOU are the dumbass that took the context ball and ran with it, assuming (incorrectly) that I "love McDonalds" and eat hamburgers constantly
See ? You started with rediculing everyone over here.... and when asked for you said it was on purpose and to laugh at us imbeciles at any given oppertunity.
So i exploited a few weak spots, like your love for McDonalds, your underpar guitarskills, your weekly harrasment of the locals in your bar while pretending to be a guitar player....
See my approach as a reflecting mirror..... and it seems to be working hearing your emotional outburts.
Quote
Yes, I do love a good hamburger. No, I do not eat McDonalds hamburgers often, in fact, rarely.
Good to hear that ! ........ it means i did influence your way of life for the better since last year ..... i don't really expect a 'thank you'
Quote
Now that you have that straight, go back to sucking your tofu sausage you stupid little man.
I don't like immitation meat, i like Asian food woth lots of chili peppers, tofu and egg.

It was a pleasure to see i finally got under the skin of the little green man who never displays a single form of respect for the very essence of this forum and it's flatearth members.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Crutchwater on January 26, 2018, 07:15:49 AM
Why should I display ANY form of respect for a flat earther?

Give me a good reason, considering the lack of respect shown for millions of astronomers, scientists, mathematicians, pilots, astronauts, mariners, cartographers, and beef farmers?

How arrogant are you to think you have had even the slightest effect on my diet?
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Bullwinkle on January 26, 2018, 07:31:15 AM
Never tried a venison burger, although we do get a lot of moose/elk here. Pretty sure it'd taste great!

 >:(
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: EvolvedMantisShrimp on January 26, 2018, 07:39:20 AM
Never tried a venison burger, although we do get a lot of moose/elk here. Pretty sure it'd taste great!

 >:(

(http://memecrunch.com/meme/BR6P2/awkward/image.gif?w=400&c=1)
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: dutchy on January 26, 2018, 08:37:54 AM
Why should I display ANY form of respect for a flat earther?

Give me a good reason, considering the lack of respect shown for millions of astronomers, scientists, mathematicians, pilots, astronauts, mariners, cartographers, and beef farmers?

How arrogant are you to think you have had even the slightest effect on my diet?
To answer your latter question first,....  i wouldn't call it 'effect' but more causality  8)

And the former is just utter nonsense.....
Your disrespect towards flatearthers show what character you are in the WRONG place !!!
Do you join a Muslim forum to claim they follow a cruel pedophile ?
Do you join a Christian forum to claim they still worship an ancient blood saga created by men ?
Do you join the David Icke forums to claim he has less brains than a lizard ?
........ i think not !!!!

But for some unknown reason you have decided to pick us to undergo your redicule to satisfy your daily needs !
You have no real arguments to present in your 1000+ posts other than to seek an oppertunity to redicule and avoid anything that looks like a conversation.

So typicle for all wannabe guitar players i know. All have a Fender or Gibson, vastly exagerate their own technique, are the worst teamplayers in ANY band, think that everyone adores multiple effect pedals, take to much space, never control their solo/rhytm volume properly etc.....

Your participation over here is that of one of those fucking irritating wannabe guitar players that should be forbidden by the law to ever perform on stage , only after first taking an exame in 'how to play together', 'basic technigue', 'the usefullness of a volume pedal' 'half the stage is to much space, and other basic footnotes only an amature wannabe guitar player doesn't understand'.

I hope you get the message little green man....... time to leave this place and mock anyone else instead !

Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Crutchwater on January 26, 2018, 08:41:26 AM
As usual, you have no idea what you're talking about...

No idea at all.!
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: dutchy on January 26, 2018, 08:52:58 AM
As usual, you have no idea what you're talking about...

No idea at all.!
After indirectly playing a part in your changing attitude towards that McPlace, my last post is full of professional advise that could also make a change for the better on stage ! I know it was a bit over the top,......but this more aggressive approach seems to work after your recent confession about rarely going to that McPlace anymore.......

This forum is a goldmine for you......
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Crutchwater on January 26, 2018, 09:02:02 AM
Your post is full of McBullshit :)
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: dutchy on January 26, 2018, 09:03:37 AM
Your post is full of McBullshit :)
;D
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rvlvr on January 26, 2018, 10:15:59 AM
Never tried a venison burger, although we do get a lot of moose/elk here. Pretty sure it'd taste great!

 >:(
Omnivores gonna omnivore! You better hope you are reborn as something else!
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Macarios on January 26, 2018, 01:20:37 PM
Kiwis please please don't read any further, just keep eating your fush-n-chups.

Just as those Nu Zul'nders can never count above five - they go one, two, three, four, five, sex and get so flustered that they can't go further.

Here's one video from your "beloved Kiwi".

Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rabinoz on January 26, 2018, 09:12:38 PM
Kiwis please please don't read any further, just keep eating your fush-n-chups.

Just as those Nu Zul'nders can never count above five - they go one, two, three, four, five, sex and get so flustered that they can't go further.

Here's one video from your "beloved Kiwi".


I spent three weeks in the South Island and have drive  the east at Christchurch (before that awful 'quake) to the west, to the north and zig-zagged down to Invercargill and finally back to Christchurch.
We know a blind pipe-organist in Christchurch and he found the earthquake very difficult. Before the 'quake he knew his house to we'll that, even though married, he could cope on his own very well. But then all the furniture moved of fell over and he was lost for opa while.
The  fush-n-chups came from a sign outside a shop in Queenstown. I guess they sell even to us Aussies.

But, I do like NZ and felt very much at home there, though so much, especially in he south, is much more like England than Australia - even to the weather.
But on difference is that even in spring I think we saw snow on some mountain or other every day we were there.

And I am also very keen on Dazzathecameraman. He, Wolfie6020, Sly Sparkane and Soundly seem to get together a bit.

For some reason there seem to be a lot of anti-Flat Earthers down this way.
Maybe the way their usual map screws up the whole Southern Hemisphere has something to do with it.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Bullwinkle on January 26, 2018, 09:28:02 PM

I spent three weeks in the South Island and have drive  the east at Christchurch (before that awful 'quake) to the west, to the north and zig-zagged down to Invercargill and finally back to Christchurch.


I spent a week on the North Island.
Have you been to Rotorua?

Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rabinoz on January 26, 2018, 09:45:55 PM

I spent three weeks in the South Island and have drive  the east at Christchurch (before that awful 'quake) to the west, to the north and zig-zagged down to Invercargill and finally back to Christchurch.

I spent a week on the North Island.
Have you been to Rotorua?
No, we've been meaning to get back but "things" get in the way.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 27, 2018, 01:08:07 AM
It's just fucking flat. It sucks because we are living on Atlantis. God doesn't want anything to do with this experiment. It is what it is.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rabinoz on January 27, 2018, 02:43:33 AM
It's just fucking flat. It sucks because we are living on Atlantis. God doesn't want anything to do with this experiment. It is what it is.
Such language from a supposedly God fearing person!

Yet you never post any evidence or reason for the earth being flat, just curse and swear to assert it.

For some quite unknown reason you and others attack NASA for no reason at all - they had nothing to do with declaring the earth a Globe. That was done millennia ago.

Yet so many like you and dutchy attack NASA with such irrational hatred, as though they stole your favourite toy.

Yet you so artifically find all these numbers in what seems no more than superstitious numerology.
By the way, I wonder why you were "Banned by IFERS"? They probably thought you detrimental to the flat earth cause.

Read again: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS) « Reply #102 on: January 26, 2018, 10:15:13 AM » (https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=73984.msg2013315#msg2013315).
You might think the earth is flat, but you are in a tiny minority, even among very conservative young earth creationists!
So look again at what others have said about this issue:
          Flat Earth Myth - More Bogus History (http://www.defendingthebride.com/code/flat.html)
          Creation Ministries International, Who invented the idea of a flat Earth? (http://www.christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c034.html)
          Early Church, Did the Early Church Believe in a Flat Earth? (https://earlychurch.org.uk/creation_flatearth.php)
          The flat earth myth (http://creation.com/flat-earth-myth)
          Christian World View Ministries, The Myth of the Flat Earth Concept (https://www.creationworldview.org/articles_view.asp?id=13)

Maybe you could make your own little club with dutchy,  Arealhumanbeing, though Arealhumanbeing seems to have run off to be "Leader of the Second American Revolution".

Bye bye again.


Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rvlvr on January 27, 2018, 02:51:34 AM
I find it cute all this is so always so US-centric what with NASA, and miles, and the good ol' 666 (not sure how much dread that sequence of numbers induces in a non-Christian).

Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: dutchy on January 27, 2018, 03:26:49 AM
For some quite unknown reason you and others attack NASA for no reason at all - they had nothing to do with declaring the earth a Globe. That was done millennia ago.
Even if you repeat the lie for the millionth time, it never becomes true !
Prior to NASA it was all hypothetical. Even if the hypothesis was extremely substancial.
Deep spacetravel proved the correct distances to the moon, earth's tilt, the respective motions of the celestial bodies........ if any of the hypothesis of the solar system were wrong not a single rocket would have gone anywhere but a dead end trip.
Add to that the only supposedly real Apollo 'blue marble' that contrary to later renderings didn't need contrast and color enhancement and a photoshop expert that takes all the time he needs to make it look better ( which it doesn't compared to the original)...... and you will see that NASA materialised all hypothesis ( no matter how trustworthy) of the solarsystem and earth.
By going exactly as planned to the moon and taking a nice blue marble picture on their trip
But you are so confused that you believe the ancient Greeks proved the globe....
It was NASA the ' father and mother' of the heliocentric reality and not Copernicus & co that one could consider to be the 'father and mother' of the hypothetical solar system.
Quote
Yet so many like you and dutchy attack NASA with such irrational hatred, as though they stole your favourite toy.
There is nothing rational about defending NASA ! And it seems that even the most nationalistic congressmen have come to the same conclusions lately.
NASA wants money, far more money, but can't make clear what they are going to do with it and what their next step will be......
Of course any rational person immidiatly smells a rat, that's why any sane person will cut fundings !
Luckily that madman Trump has considered to cut it even more when it comes to the fakestation.
Off the record many congressmen believe NASA is a financial blackhole , but since their own job comes under attack to openly criticise NASA and supposed achievements of the past the process of full disclosure is a time consuming one.
Ask any citizen what NASA has ever done for humanity...  and maybe just maybe a lone wolf mentions teflon tape....
Time to end this fantasy once and for all !
Quote
Maybe you could make your own little club with dutchy,  Arealhumanbeing, though Arealhumanbeing seems to have run off to be "Leader of the Second American Revolution".

Bye bye again.
I am capable of my own ideas and don't need any support from anyone and i am alergic to any group.

But it was a little joke ? wasn't  it ?
I can only applaud you for it mister humorless, .... it will take you months,even years to finetune the skills involved in humor.
But i can only support this babystep away from the grumpy old man you used to be !
Bravo !
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rabinoz on January 27, 2018, 04:34:49 AM
For some quite unknown reason you and others attack NASA for no reason at all - they had nothing to do with declaring the earth a Globe. That was done millennia ago.
Even if you repeat the lie for the millionth time, it never becomes true !
Prior to NASA it was all hypothetical. Even if the hypothesis was extremely substancial.
As you say, "Even if you repeat the lie for the millionth time, it never becomes true!", but you still do it.

What you claim is totally untrue. While most people could not have cared less as far as I know all those involved in investigating the earth's shape and those in astronomy were in no doubt at all.

There is no flat earth model that even explains the easily observed behaviour of the sun and moon, let alone all the other evidence.

Quote from: dutchy
Deep spacetravel proved the correct distances to the moon, earth's tilt, the respective motions of the celestial bodies........ if any of the hypothesis of the solar system were wrong not a single rocket would have gone anywhere but a dead end trip.
All of those things were known with quite good accuracy well before NASA and any deep space travel. Of course much more accurate data is now avaivable.

Sure, space travel provided space confirmation for those too lazy or couldn't understand the very solid evidence for the Globe that was all around.

I'll ignore the rest till you've digested that. You might change your tune ever so slightly.

But you, like so many flat-earthers prefer to attack the messenger, me in this case, rather than even give the evidence a cursory glance.
I say this because much of the information above is from posts to you!

With some of the insults from you, Papa  Legba and a few others, I believe I have reason to feel a bit grumpy at times.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: dutchy on January 27, 2018, 01:30:44 PM
All of those things were known with quite good accuracy well before NASA and any deep space travel. Of course much more accurate data is now avaivable.
It wasn't even proven if earth was stationary or not....deep space travel made that indisputable.
While the docu ''the principle'' has very convincing info about the earth being stationary.
But then of course we never went to the moon, because all trajectories to the moon and re-entry on earth would have been off by some margin in a geocentric model.
The docu ''the priciple'' (wonder if you ever watched it) makes clear that observations from earth are totally different compared to the real test of the hypotheses....going somewhere which is only possible when all hypothesis about distance, spin, orbital velocities are damned accurate.
Again NASA/Apollo (and to some extend the Russians) have supposedly ended the discussion about a geocentric vs heliocentric model for good.
Unless they were fraudulent governments involved in a supposed ''spacerace'' over the heads of the terrified nations who gave them financially ''carte blanche'' to protect their families from the demonic ''other side''.
I remember an episode of Battlestar Galactica where on an alien earthlike planet the bad guys were called the ''Eastern Alliance'' that started a nuclear war, Luckily ''Galactica'' destroyed all nukes in the atmosphere.
An example of how both camps used all means of propaganda to paint a very evil picture of the other side.
Again a ''cart blanche'' to do what ever you want as a government, because you have installed extreme fear for an atomic war into the minds of your own population.

Any government capable of abusing it's own citizens in such fashion, will lie about everything that serves their agenda.
The whole ''spacerace'' was military propaganda....the Apollo missions were simply the tinfoil layers to cover up what was really going on.
Quote
With some of the insults from you, Papa  Legba and a few others, I believe I have reason to feel a bit grumpy at times.
See what you do ? As if what i write (insults ?)belongs in the same bracket as what Papa writes (which is non of my business)
But this is showing your character,.....i have only responded to your ongoing rude talk towards me......''NASAphobe,hate filled, mr. know it all''
I do so with humor (former electricien, grumpy old man, copy paiste master) which i hardly consider insults, compares to what i have to endure from globelings in general.
No problem with that at all, but it is false to pretend as if i am insulting you in a rude manner......because that is simply untrue !!

Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: ER22 on January 27, 2018, 04:23:57 PM
The Earth is FLAT. And the number 666 is a fingerprint that keeps "popping up," coincidentally. You can move your numbers around to be exacting, but the point is, they constantly use that number as "examples." For instance, NASA says that "Mercury is 666 times brighter than Earth from the Sun using the inverse square law." Why not use Venus instead? The reason they presented Mercury, instead of ANY OTHER planet, is because they need to TELL YOU that they are Satanists. It's a psychopathic trait, like we see all the time with serial killers and the clues they leave behind. My numbers are correct. I'm not budging.

The first guy, red snake, said the Earth was revolving at 67,111, while my video is correct, the mean velocity is 66,600. He either lied, or was ignorant. Therefore, I suggest that he not be taken seriously, whatsoever. You guys wanna talk about burgers and distract from the math. Anyone who knows the Earth is flat can refute you very simply. Another guy, stated that the tip of S. America, to the tip of S. Africa is not 6,066 miles, but instead 6, 027 miles, because he moved his pointer from the tip to the middle of the nearest city. It's like this with all of you guys who want to claim I'm lying with your misrepresentation of the math trying to get away with lies. You know what you're doing, or you're not smart. A third guy said that I need to get a calculator, that 100 minus 23 is 76.6, not 66.6, but a circle has 360 degrees, and divided by 4 is 90, not 100. My numbers are correct, I'm not budging. I will not be lectured by liars and deceivers in a den infested by vipers. The obviousness of the pathetic attempt to discredit the math is profusely absurd, and will not be tolerated.

So there!
This guy knows what he's talkin' bout
Cause reasons...
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rabinoz on January 27, 2018, 06:55:45 PM
All of those things were known with quite good accuracy well before NASA and any deep space travel. Of course much more accurate data is now avaivable.
It wasn't even proven if earth was stationary or not....deep space travel made that indisputable.
Virtually all astronomers from after Kepler would hotly dispute that claim. A stationary Globe does not fit the movements of the planets.

Quote from: dutchy
While the docu ''the principle'' has very convincing info about the earth being stationary.
And where did most of the "evidence" presented in "The Principle" come from? Hint - not from the surface of a flat earth!
Answer me that and we'll start again.

OK, it was some 1800 years or more from the Globe being accepted as the shape of the earth to the Heliocentric Globe for a very good reason.
Aristarchus (and others) did suggest that the earth should orbit the sun instead of vice-versa.
He reasoned that it was logical that the smaller object, the earth, should orbit the larger.

His idea was rejected because it was argued that if the earth orbited the sun that "fixed stars" would appear to move, ie show parallax.

This view held sway till Copernicus[1], but even then the heliocentric model was presented because it explained the apparent motion of the planets better.
Then Tycho Brahe made his far more accurate measurements of the apparent motion of the planets, but still could not accept the
"Copernican Hypothesis".
Once again this was because even with his far more precise measurements he could detect no stellar parallax, so he proposed his own The Tychonian planetary model, which was better than even the Copernican system.
There are quite a number, including at least one ex-flat earther, who uses the The Tychonian geostationary model.

The reasoning of these people, at the time, seemed quite valid, but even Tycho Brahe could only resolve down to about 1 minute of arc.
Proxima Centauri, the closest star to earth, has a parallax of only 0.769 arcsec, so Tycho Brahe had no chance of seeing it.
That angle is approximately that subtended by an object 2 cm in diameter located 5.3 km away.

So for the moment let's forget the heliocentric model and look at just the shape of the earth.
I have presented many references that in both the early Church and in the Muslim world from say 500 to 1250 AD at least the Globe was certainly the accepted shape of the earth and in the Greek world that belief goes back anothe 1000 years or so.

I'll just give a link to an earlier post to the pre-Copernican beliefs: Flat Earth Debate / Re: SYD to SCL and flight range « Message by rabinoz on October 19, 2017, 01:30:51 PM » (https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=72377.msg1971828;topicseen#msg1971828).

And on details of the beliefs in the earth shape and "cosmology" in the "middle Ages", this might be worth reading THE SPHERE OF SACROBOSCO, by Iohannes de Sacrobosco (http://www.esotericarchives.com/solomon/sphere.htm).
Iohannes de Sacrobosco "was a scholar, monk and astronomer who was a teacher at the University of Paris."

[1] Though some claim that the Heliocentric Model was presented in the Muslim world around 1250 AD, possibly by Qutb al-Din al-Shirazi.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: markjo on January 27, 2018, 07:11:28 PM
All of those things were known with quite good accuracy well before NASA and any deep space travel. Of course much more accurate data is now avaivable.
It wasn't even proven if earth was stationary or not....
Incorrect.  Stellar aberration proved that the earth is not stationary back in 1727.
http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-05/2-05.htm

...deep space travel made that indisputable.
Agreed.  Deep space travel is indisputable proof that the earth is not stationary.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Alpha2Omega on January 27, 2018, 07:27:52 PM
If 666 represents all evil, is 25.806975801127880315188420605149 the root of all evil? ???
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rabinoz on January 28, 2018, 12:21:17 AM
And circles are totally satanic! The first 100,000 digits of (http://www.geom.uiuc.edu/~huberty/math5337/groupe/pilogo.gif) have buried at least 73 "666's" and 83 "616's" buried in them.

Check for yourself at: 100,000 Digits of (http://www.geom.uiuc.edu/~huberty/math5337/groupe/pilogo.gif) (http://www.geom.uiuc.edu/~huberty/math5337/groupe/digits.html)
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 28, 2018, 03:37:56 AM
"...deep space travel made that indisputable."

Do you not fucking understand that we don't believe in deep space travel? How can you travel in a vacuum with nothing to propel off of? We just don't believe it. Why do you keep trying to convince us? You guys are so desperate and pathetic, like, why are you here on a Flat Earth Forum trying to argue with people as though it's going to change our mind? It's not gonna happen! You can't just say - "deep space travel proves that," when we don't believe it. I don't understand what part of your brain doesn't get that your argument is meaningless and a waste of everyone's damn time... 
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Nightsky on January 28, 2018, 03:51:36 AM
"...deep space travel made that indisputable."

Do you not fucking understand that we don't believe in deep space travel? How can you travel in a vacuum with nothing to propel off of? We just don't believe it. Why do you keep trying to convince us? You guys are so desperate and pathetic, like, why are you here on a Flat Earth Forum trying to argue with people as though it's going to change our mind? It's not gonna happen! You can't just say - "deep space travel proves that," when we don't believe it. I don't understand what part of your brain doesn't get that your argument is meaningless and a waste of everyone's damn time...

We get you. We believe you.  Your a close minded deranged  idiot who ignores all the evidence, that’s your choice. Your more than welcome to stand in the corner wearing your tin foil hat and screaming fake at irregular intervals, if it makes you happy go for it.

Obtw, you forgot one crucial fact from your initial list, your IQ...66.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Crutchwater on January 28, 2018, 03:57:04 AM
Ahhh... The "why are you here" card!

The answer is simple. YOU may be a lost cause, but there are those that are not convinced either way. Some come here in hopes of providing knowledge enough to sway against the easy "it looks flat" path.

I come here to laugh, and watch the flat earth movement die. I accidentally learned some things along the way. Many due to the writings of Mr B in Australia

The reality is, space travel is possible, and in fact, quite common and routine.
Do you really think it matters one bit what you believe versus reality?
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 28, 2018, 04:00:10 AM
Wow. You hurted my feelings. You must be really a pathetic person to try incessantly to convince the Flat-Earthers that we're "wrong." We just don't believe you. We are saying that you are a liar. It doesn't matter if you tell us that we "ignore the evidence." We have reviewed the evidence, and believe it to be a LIE. What about that does your brain not understand? You can sit here and rehash the same garbage a million times, and we still don't believe you, yet you keep trying... You really think that what you're saying is going to change our mind, the million and oneth time? Get it through your thick skull, we do not believe you. The idea that you are going to belittle us into feeling shunned isn't going to make us feel like we need to change our view just so you will like us or agree with us. And yes, I'm sorry, but we are actually trying to ruin your little sci-fi fairy tale fantasy world of make believe.
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Nightsky on January 28, 2018, 04:11:34 AM
Wow. You hurted my feelings. You must be really a pathetic person to try incessantly to convince the Flat-Earthers that we're "wrong." We just don't believe you. We are saying that you are a liar. It doesn't matter if you tell us that we "ignore the evidence." We have reviewed the evidence, and believe it to be a LIE. What about that does your brain not understand? You can sit here and rehash the same garbage a million times, and we still don't believe you, yet you keep trying... You really think that what you're saying is going to change our mind, the million and oneth time? Get it through your thick skull, we do not believe you. The idea that you are going to belittle us into feeling shunned isn't going to make us feel like we need to change our view just so you will like us or agree with us. And yes, I'm sorry, but we are actually trying to ruin your little sci-fi fairy tale fantasy world of make believe.

You have feelings! I didn’t think a dismembered ass in  a jar could have them, I think your mistaking lines of bubbles for feelings, think again.
Convince you why? What’s the gain? Who else would we all laugh at?
What you choose to believe in is your choice, just like the fictionalised world you created and now inhabit.

Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Aophos on January 28, 2018, 04:20:11 AM
Hey guys, "Space travel is totally possible! In fact, we do it all the time!" LOL Fucking kidding me. Hey... maybe a Flat-Earther actually beLIEved you this time! Maybe you should start a group for Flat-Earth Recovery. When is your brain going to realize you are wasting your time?
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Crutchwater on January 28, 2018, 04:23:53 AM
Hey guys, "Space travel is totally possible! In fact, we do it all the time!" LOL Fucking kidding me. Hey... maybe a Flat-Earther actually beLIEved you this time! Maybe you should start a group for Flat-Earth Recovery. When is your brain going to realize you are wasting your time?


YOU are why I'm here!

Thank you!
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: rabinoz on January 28, 2018, 04:53:36 AM
Wow. You hurted my feelings.
Tough cheese, you come here accusing thousands of ordinary people of being Satanists.
You are the pathetic person to try incessantly to convince the world that these prople are evil.

Quote from: Aophos
You must be really a pathetic person to try incessantly to convince the Flat-Earthers that we're "wrong." We just don't believe you. We are saying that you are a liar. It doesn't matter if you tell us that we "ignore the evidence." We have reviewed the evidence, and believe it to be a LIE. What about that does your brain not understand?
You have reviewed the evidence, sure, then discarded any that didn't suit your own preconceived notions about the shape of the earth.

I understand quite well that you've spent so many months trying to prove that NASA is Satanist that you would never be prepared to admit that you are wrong.

Besides, you have no reason to hate NASA, they weren't the ones that convinced the world that the earth was a Globe.
That has been the common belief for over two millennia and seems to have been the accepted belief even in the early Church.

You seem to have totally ignore what I wrote about the English monk the Venerable Bede and The 13th century French scholar, monk and astronomer, Iohannes de Sacrobosco,
in Flat Earth General / Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS) « on: January 26, 2018, 10:15:13 AM » (https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=73984.msg2013315#msg2013315).

I'm supposed to hang onto every word you say, yet you totally ignore what I say!

Quote from: Aophos
You can sit here and rehash the same garbage a million times, and we still don't believe you, yet you keep trying... You really think that what you're saying is going to change our mind, the million and oneth time? Get it through your thick skull, we do not believe you. The idea that you are going to belittle us into feeling shunned isn't going to make us feel like we need to change our view just so you will like us or agree with us. And yes, I'm sorry, but we are actually trying to ruin your little sci-fi fairy tale fantasy world of make believe.
Sure, we know that a totally indictrinated believer in the flat earth conspiracy will never be convinced.

Sorry, but there is no flat earth model that can even explain even the movement of the sun and moon let alone everything else.
Not only that, but flat-earthers themselves admit that there is no accurate map of the flat earth.

And yet you have the gall to claim that we live in a "sci-fi fairy tale fantasy world of make-believe."

If you think the earth is flat, prove it and show how simple things like the movement of the sun and moon fit into it.

You can't get away with simply saying that "The earth is fxxxing flat", that cuts no ice and makes us think that you have no logical reason for thinking the earth is flat.

By the way, I do hope that you noticed that I proved that (http://www.geom.uiuc.edu/~huberty/math5337/groupe/pilogo.gif) is Satanic, having many "666's" and 83 "616's" buried in it.
And that took me all of 5 minutes and you had months delving into every number you could find that you thought was remotely connected with NASA.
But 90% of your numbers had nothing to do with NASA.

Of course, you'll find any sequence you like, if you look for months as you did.

Honestly it looks like roughly 110% confirmation bias - you hunted specifically for "666" and of course you found "666".
Title: Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
Post by: Macarios on January 28, 2018, 05:35:15 AM
"...deep space travel made that indisputable."

Do you not fucking understand that we don't believe in deep space travel? How can you travel in a vacuum with nothing to propel off of? We just don't believe it. Why do you keep trying to convince us? You guys are so desperate and pathetic, like, why are you here on a Flat Earth Forum trying to argue with people as though it's going to change our mind? It's not gonna happen! You can't just say - "deep space travel proves that," when we don't believe it. I don't understand what part of your brain doesn't get that your argument is meaningless and a waste of everyone's damn time...

Deep space travel DOESN'T REQUIRE your belief.
Neither will your disbelief make it disappear.

You travel in vacuum by propelling off the gasses rocket pushes backwards at high speed.
Mass of the gasses times speed of the gasses adds momentum to the remaining mass of the rocket.
It is simply described in the "Law of Action and Reaction", or in "Law of Conservation of Momentum".

It makes no difference if gasses were found already there, or brought by rocket itself.
Your disbelief won't make this disappear either.

Your disbelief also won't make evidence "invalid" by default.
However, it can initiate process of disproving things, if they are wrong enough to be disproved.
Not if you just want to make them vanish.
For that you have to accept some knowledge about that stuff.

Things still exist not only when we don't believe in them.
Things exist even when we do not know about them at all.
Can you imagine how big is the pool of knowledge that mankind didn't discover yet?
Sounds endless to me.

I'm not trying to convince YOU.
I'm just "saving" new readers from delusions and misconceptions by revealing facts and figures.
Everyone deserves information as COMPLETE as possible, not just cherry-picking.
You too deserve more information than you already know by now.
What will you do with it, it is your own decision.
You, yourself, believe whatever you want.
I won't stop you.

This forum is public place.
I have the same right to be here as you do.
For now.
If OWNER OF THIS FORUM decides to remove me, it is their decision.
Not yours.

------------------------------------------------

Sorry for harsh words, but the part about how rocket works in vacuum stands.
And part about how much we don't know yet.