(https://279173f3.nuajik.io/230-large_default/mountain-dew-diet-soda.jpg)Isn't Heiwa Dutch?
<Sets down an ice cold can of Diet Mountain Dew>
Heiwa, what the hell is wrong with the food in this god forsaken country of yours? I mean it's beautiful here but Paris is the only city that I've visited where I've actually lost weight. Your people get an unfair reputation for being rude but all of your waitresses are horrible at their jobs. There's a restaurant on Champs-Élysées that has the honor of being the only place that I've ever ran out on the check, mostly in protest to the terrible food and service and every single food establishment in France. Last time I visited I was here a week. I never ate at the same place twice. Every single restaurant I went to was worse than the one before. That means that if I lived in France that every meal would be the worst meal of my life.
Do you seriously like this warmed over garbage you call food here? Is this some kind of prank you're playing on the entire world?
Isn't Heiwa Dutch?
Isn't Heiwa Dutch?
Yeah, but he lives in France as far as I know.
Isn't Heiwa Dutch?No, he's Swedish. Haven't you read is CP on his popular web site that has never been proven wrong?
Heiwa, I would like to talk about space travel. It is a fascinating subject and I was wondering, lets talk about faked moon landings (or fake return trips from the moon). This doesn't mean that space flight in of itself is impossible. Just that we haven't discovered a viable means of getting people on return trips. Landing on the moon may be easier than the Earth as it has less gravity and no atmosphere to burn you up. We can see though with the Mars One project there were countless numbers of people that would relish the opportunity to knowingly take a one way trip to Mars even when the odds of getting there are slim, and the odds of surviving more than a few minutes in its surface would be even slimmer. Perhaps the people who 'came' back from the moon were not the same people who landed on the moon but body doubles! The real landers are probably still on the moon.
But do you think humanity is bound to Earth forever? Should we invest all our resources into this planet for as long as we can, never even dreaming of a future where we colonise space? Or do you see an opportunity that perhaps someday, we can become advanced enough to leave this planet. Even if the only way was literally in Artificial Intelligence form and uploading our 'consciousness' into the cosmos. Maybe our human bodies are simply too frail.
I would like your insight on this mind boggling subject
Can you read heiwa? You just broke every fucking rule for participation in this thread. Pretend we are sitting at your table right now enjoying a Nespresso. What do you say on the matter? Your website links are forbidden. Your use of the word Twerps can only be used if someone disrespects you personally while 'in your office'.Well, all I have to say about space travel is at my website and I hate to repeat myself in writing. Have a go at my €1M space Challenge. http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm . It gives you a chance to finally understand the difficulties involved to fly in space to and piss on the Moon or Mars and during the trips.
So please try again. I took the time to ask the question. Take some time to answer it. Your own words, here and now. Just like I'm at your table
I hate to say it but I am fantasizing about being with you right now Heiwa! Give it to me!!!
What do you and your fellow twerps do during the voyage apart from pissing?
What do you and your fellow twerps do during the voyage apart from pissing?
Guzzle sweet, sweet Nescafe. ;)
A bunch of links to websites that are nothing but conjecture using on junk science based on your shoddy research
Heiwa, I would like to talk about space travel. It is a fascinating subject and I was wondering, lets talk about faked moon landings (or fake return trips from the moon). This doesn't mean that space flight in of itself is impossible. Just that we haven't discovered a viable means of getting people on return trips. Landing on the moon may be easier than the Earth as it has less gravity and no atmosphere to burn you up. We can see though with the Mars One project there were countless numbers of people that would relish the opportunity to knowingly take a one way trip to Mars even when the odds of getting there are slim, and the odds of surviving more than a few minutes in its surface would be even slimmer. Perhaps the people who 'came' back from the moon were not the same people who landed on the moon but body doubles! The real landers are probably still on the moon.
But do you think humanity is bound to Earth forever? Should we invest all our resources into this planet for as long as we can, never even dreaming of a future where we colonise space? Or do you see an opportunity that perhaps someday, we can become advanced enough to leave this planet. Even if the only way was literally in Artificial Intelligence form and uploading our 'consciousness' into the cosmos. Maybe our human bodies are simply too frail.
I would like your insight on this mind boggling subject
Thanks for asking. Please study:
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw2.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel2.htm
Only twerps believe in human space travel. Prove me wrong and collect €1M!
http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm
Meh, northern Europe. Close enough guess for me.Isn't Heiwa Dutch?No, he's Swedish. Haven't you read is CP on his popular web site that has never been proven wrong?
Heiwa, what is the square root of 4?...in hexadecimal.
Heiwa, what is the square root of 4?...in hexadecimal.
It gives you a chance to finally understand the difficulties involved to fly in space to and piss on the Moon or Mars and during the trips.No one is denying the difficulties of manned space travel. You have yet to show why manned space travel should be impossible, given proper engineering and resources. Just saying that there is no way to lift enough propellant doesn't mean anything unless you can clearly show an upper limit to rocket size and power.
Heiwa, I tried to be nice and reasonable and give you the chance to really have decent discussions and get your side out there but you just cant help yourself. There was to be no calling of twerps or linking to your website. Just having the kind of talk we could have if we really were in your office having your fine Nespresso.You sound like a twerp.
Is this the way you would talk if someone spent all that money travelling to see you? Just tell them an old link to your website and your stupid challenge? What's the point of seeing you then?
This is your opportunity to articulate your side of it. Don't mess this thread up with your website, challenges or your 19th century outdated name calling.
Other people have asked you questions here too, why ignore them? They are at your table Heiwa. So engage with them :)
Is that what you would say If we were face to face after I spent all that money and time to have a chat with you????
That's pretty low man
Twerps are low
And, there it is. You can't carry on a civil, polite conversion. You only know how to engage in personal attacks. Typical.Heiwa, I tried to be nice and reasonable and give you the chance to really have decent discussions and get your side out there but you just cant help yourself. There was to be no calling of twerps or linking to your website. Just having the kind of talk we could have if we really were in your office having your fine Nespresso.You sound like a twerp.
Is this the way you would talk if someone spent all that money travelling to see you? Just tell them an old link to your website and your stupid challenge? What's the point of seeing you then?
This is your opportunity to articulate your side of it. Don't mess this thread up with your website, challenges or your 19th century outdated name calling.
Other people have asked you questions here too, why ignore them? They are at your table Heiwa. So engage with them :)
And, there it is. You can't carry on a civil, polite conversion. You only know how to engage in personal attacks. Typical.Heiwa, I tried to be nice and reasonable and give you the chance to really have decent discussions and get your side out there but you just cant help yourself. There was to be no calling of twerps or linking to your website. Just having the kind of talk we could have if we really were in your office having your fine Nespresso.You sound like a twerp.
Is this the way you would talk if someone spent all that money travelling to see you? Just tell them an old link to your website and your stupid challenge? What's the point of seeing you then?
This is your opportunity to articulate your side of it. Don't mess this thread up with your website, challenges or your 19th century outdated name calling.
Other people have asked you questions here too, why ignore them? They are at your table Heiwa. So engage with them :)
It hasn't worked for you because you continue with the personal attacks. Maybe you should drink heavily.And, there it is. You can't carry on a civil, polite conversion. You only know how to engage in personal attacks. Typical.Heiwa, I tried to be nice and reasonable and give you the chance to really have decent discussions and get your side out there but you just cant help yourself. There was to be no calling of twerps or linking to your website. Just having the kind of talk we could have if we really were in your office having your fine Nespresso.You sound like a twerp.
Is this the way you would talk if someone spent all that money travelling to see you? Just tell them an old link to your website and your stupid challenge? What's the point of seeing you then?
This is your opportunity to articulate your side of it. Don't mess this thread up with your website, challenges or your 19th century outdated name calling.
Other people have asked you questions here too, why ignore them? They are at your table Heiwa. So engage with them :)
You sound tired. Try triathlon. Swim, ran and bike. It will keep you out of trouble.
It hasn't worked for you because you continue with the personal attacks. Maybe you should drink heavily.And, there it is. You can't carry on a civil, polite conversion. You only know how to engage in personal attacks. Typical.Heiwa, I tried to be nice and reasonable and give you the chance to really have decent discussions and get your side out there but you just cant help yourself. There was to be no calling of twerps or linking to your website. Just having the kind of talk we could have if we really were in your office having your fine Nespresso.You sound like a twerp.
Is this the way you would talk if someone spent all that money travelling to see you? Just tell them an old link to your website and your stupid challenge? What's the point of seeing you then?
This is your opportunity to articulate your side of it. Don't mess this thread up with your website, challenges or your 19th century outdated name calling.
Other people have asked you questions here too, why ignore them? They are at your table Heiwa. So engage with them :)
You sound tired. Try triathlon. Swim, ran and bike. It will keep you out of trouble.
It hasn't worked for you because you continue with the personal attacks. Maybe you should drink heavily.And, there it is. You can't carry on a civil, polite conversion. You only know how to engage in personal attacks. Typical.Heiwa, I tried to be nice and reasonable and give you the chance to really have decent discussions and get your side out there but you just cant help yourself. There was to be no calling of twerps or linking to your website. Just having the kind of talk we could have if we really were in your office having your fine Nespresso.You sound like a twerp.
Is this the way you would talk if someone spent all that money travelling to see you? Just tell them an old link to your website and your stupid challenge? What's the point of seeing you then?
This is your opportunity to articulate your side of it. Don't mess this thread up with your website, challenges or your 19th century outdated name calling.
Other people have asked you questions here too, why ignore them? They are at your table Heiwa. So engage with them :)
You sound tired. Try triathlon. Swim, ran and bike. It will keep you out of trouble.
In case you have not noticed, many people here constantly attack Heiwa. You do not mention that, and only focus on Heiwa defending himself. You sound like CNN.
Sadly all you provide on your website is you saying you don't understand it so it must be a hoax. There is no solid evidence there to support your claims. Hard stop.It hasn't worked for you because you continue with the personal attacks. Maybe you should drink heavily.And, there it is. You can't carry on a civil, polite conversion. You only know how to engage in personal attacks. Typical.Heiwa, I tried to be nice and reasonable and give you the chance to really have decent discussions and get your side out there but you just cant help yourself. There was to be no calling of twerps or linking to your website. Just having the kind of talk we could have if we really were in your office having your fine Nespresso.You sound like a twerp.
Is this the way you would talk if someone spent all that money travelling to see you? Just tell them an old link to your website and your stupid challenge? What's the point of seeing you then?
This is your opportunity to articulate your side of it. Don't mess this thread up with your website, challenges or your 19th century outdated name calling.
Other people have asked you questions here too, why ignore them? They are at your table Heiwa. So engage with them :)
You sound tired. Try triathlon. Swim, ran and bike. It will keep you out of trouble.
In case you have not noticed, many people here constantly attack Heiwa. You do not mention that, and only focus on Heiwa defending himself. You sound like CNN.
CNN would not even mention me! I simply believe that
1. nuclear weapons is a hoax.
2. manned space travel is a hoax.
3. Arabs destroying WTC/NY 911 from tops down is a hoax.
4. Ship sinking due to lost bow visor is a hoax.
5. Fusion on Earth is not possible.
6. Earth is globe covered by >70% salt water.
I provide solid evidence for 1-4 at http://heiwaco.com . 5 requires plenty hot energy to get started, so the whole thing melts before anything happens. 6. I have sailed around it a couple of times.
4. Ship sinking due to lost bow visor is a hoax.
You sound like a complete twerp.Sadly all you provide on your website is you saying you don't understand it so it must be a hoax. There is no solid evidence there to support your claims. Hard stop.It hasn't worked for you because you continue with the personal attacks. Maybe you should drink heavily.And, there it is. You can't carry on a civil, polite conversion. You only know how to engage in personal attacks. Typical.Heiwa, I tried to be nice and reasonable and give you the chance to really have decent discussions and get your side out there but you just cant help yourself. There was to be no calling of twerps or linking to your website. Just having the kind of talk we could have if we really were in your office having your fine Nespresso.You sound like a twerp.
Is this the way you would talk if someone spent all that money travelling to see you? Just tell them an old link to your website and your stupid challenge? What's the point of seeing you then?
This is your opportunity to articulate your side of it. Don't mess this thread up with your website, challenges or your 19th century outdated name calling.
Other people have asked you questions here too, why ignore them? They are at your table Heiwa. So engage with them :)
You sound tired. Try triathlon. Swim, ran and bike. It will keep you out of trouble.
In case you have not noticed, many people here constantly attack Heiwa. You do not mention that, and only focus on Heiwa defending himself. You sound like CNN.
CNN would not even mention me! I simply believe that
1. nuclear weapons is a hoax.
2. manned space travel is a hoax.
3. Arabs destroying WTC/NY 911 from tops down is a hoax.
4. Ship sinking due to lost bow visor is a hoax.
5. Fusion on Earth is not possible.
6. Earth is globe covered by >70% salt water.
I provide solid evidence for 1-4 at http://heiwaco.com . 5 requires plenty hot energy to get started, so the whole thing melts before anything happens. 6. I have sailed around it a couple of times.
You sound like a complete twerp.Sadly all you provide on your website is you saying you don't understand it so it must be a hoax. There is no solid evidence there to support your claims. Hard stop.It hasn't worked for you because you continue with the personal attacks. Maybe you should drink heavily.And, there it is. You can't carry on a civil, polite conversion. You only know how to engage in personal attacks. Typical.Heiwa, I tried to be nice and reasonable and give you the chance to really have decent discussions and get your side out there but you just cant help yourself. There was to be no calling of twerps or linking to your website. Just having the kind of talk we could have if we really were in your office having your fine Nespresso.You sound like a twerp.
Is this the way you would talk if someone spent all that money travelling to see you? Just tell them an old link to your website and your stupid challenge? What's the point of seeing you then?
This is your opportunity to articulate your side of it. Don't mess this thread up with your website, challenges or your 19th century outdated name calling.
Other people have asked you questions here too, why ignore them? They are at your table Heiwa. So engage with them :)
You sound tired. Try triathlon. Swim, ran and bike. It will keep you out of trouble.
In case you have not noticed, many people here constantly attack Heiwa. You do not mention that, and only focus on Heiwa defending himself. You sound like CNN.
CNN would not even mention me! I simply believe that
1. nuclear weapons is a hoax.
2. manned space travel is a hoax.
3. Arabs destroying WTC/NY 911 from tops down is a hoax.
4. Ship sinking due to lost bow visor is a hoax.
5. Fusion on Earth is not possible.
6. Earth is globe covered by >70% salt water.
I provide solid evidence for 1-4 at http://heiwaco.com . 5 requires plenty hot energy to get started, so the whole thing melts before anything happens. 6. I have sailed around it a couple of times.
Meh, northern Europe. Close enough guess for me.Isn't Heiwa Dutch?No, he's Swedish. Haven't you read is CP on his popular web site that has never been proven wrong?
You sound like a complete twerp.Sadly all you provide on your website is you saying you don't understand it so it must be a hoax. There is no solid evidence there to support your claims. Hard stop.It hasn't worked for you because you continue with the personal attacks. Maybe you should drink heavily.And, there it is. You can't carry on a civil, polite conversion. You only know how to engage in personal attacks. Typical.Heiwa, I tried to be nice and reasonable and give you the chance to really have decent discussions and get your side out there but you just cant help yourself. There was to be no calling of twerps or linking to your website. Just having the kind of talk we could have if we really were in your office having your fine Nespresso.You sound like a twerp.
Is this the way you would talk if someone spent all that money travelling to see you? Just tell them an old link to your website and your stupid challenge? What's the point of seeing you then?
This is your opportunity to articulate your side of it. Don't mess this thread up with your website, challenges or your 19th century outdated name calling.
Other people have asked you questions here too, why ignore them? They are at your table Heiwa. So engage with them :)
You sound tired. Try triathlon. Swim, ran and bike. It will keep you out of trouble.
In case you have not noticed, many people here constantly attack Heiwa. You do not mention that, and only focus on Heiwa defending himself. You sound like CNN.
CNN would not even mention me! I simply believe that
1. nuclear weapons is a hoax.
2. manned space travel is a hoax.
3. Arabs destroying WTC/NY 911 from tops down is a hoax.
4. Ship sinking due to lost bow visor is a hoax.
5. Fusion on Earth is not possible.
6. Earth is globe covered by >70% salt water.
I provide solid evidence for 1-4 at http://heiwaco.com . 5 requires plenty hot energy to get started, so the whole thing melts before anything happens. 6. I have sailed around it a couple of times.
I agree.
Greetings again HeiwaHe sounds like one. And his math is wrong.
(http://coffeemania.ie/cms/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/nespresso-coffee-capsules-arpeggio-294x294.jpg)
I've been looking on Youtube at the channel 'Space Time' and I found an interesting video about 'strange stars'
What are your thoughts on neutron stars or quark stars?
Is this Matt O'Dowd a twerp?
Greetings again HeiwaHe sounds like one. And his math is wrong.
(http://coffeemania.ie/cms/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/nespresso-coffee-capsules-arpeggio-294x294.jpg)
I've been looking on Youtube at the channel 'Space Time' and I found an interesting video about 'strange stars'
What are your thoughts on neutron stars or quark stars?
Is this Matt O'Dowd a twerp?
Greetings again HeiwaHe sounds like one. And his math is wrong.
I've been looking on Youtube at the channel 'Space Time' and I found an interesting video about 'strange stars'
What are your thoughts on neutron stars or quark stars?
Is this Matt O'Dowd a twerp?
Well, I open a page and want to reply but "scripts are running", "the page does not respond" or "it is unsafe to click further"? bla, bla, bla.Greetings again HeiwaHe sounds like one. And his math is wrong.
(http://coffeemania.ie/cms/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/nespresso-coffee-capsules-arpeggio-294x294.jpg)
I've been looking on Youtube at the channel 'Space Time' and I found an interesting video about 'strange stars'
What are your thoughts on neutron stars or quark stars?
Is this Matt O'Dowd a twerp?
You've been gone for a week and then return just to show us a purple jelly mold!
Explain yourself!
Well, I open a page and want to reply but "scripts are running", "the page does not respond" or "it is unsafe to click further"? bla, bla, bla.Greetings again HeiwaHe sounds like one. And his math is wrong.
(http://coffeemania.ie/cms/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/nespresso-coffee-capsules-arpeggio-294x294.jpg)
I've been looking on Youtube at the channel 'Space Time' and I found an interesting video about 'strange stars'
What are your thoughts on neutron stars or quark stars?
Is this Matt O'Dowd a twerp?
You've been gone for a week and then return just to show us a purple jelly mold!
Explain yourself!
Better to take a week off.
Don't you agree?
Do you really exist?
Prove it.
Can you correct the math Heiwa?
Hm, http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm is a popular article by me about strange stars, black holes, quasars, etc, that human space travellers must avoid and space time and gravity waves and what people invent to get Nobel prizes.
It is not spam. You have to click yourself to visit it on the internet. No costs, no adverts.
Hm, http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm is a popular article by me about strange stars, black holes, quasars, etc, that human space travellers must avoid and space time and gravity waves and what people invent to get Nobel prizes.
It is not spam. You have to click yourself to visit it on the internet. No costs, no adverts.
Someone has to make a compilation of every time Heiwa has said "Hm,".
Hey Heiwa,You sound like one. But don't worry! You are not alone.
(http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/NDI2WDUwMA==/z/8pEAAOxycmBS-rUI/$_3.JPG?set_id=2)
Am I a twerp? Is there a cure for twerpness? What do I do if I suspect any loved one has become a twerp?
Hm, http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm is a popular article by me about strange stars, black holes, quasars, etc, that human space travellers must avoid and space time and gravity waves and what people invent to get Nobel prizes.
It is not spam. You have to click yourself to visit it on the internet. No costs, no adverts.
Someone has to make a compilation of every time Heiwa has said "Hm,".
Why not yourself?
Heiwa, have you at some point in the past suffered a significant head injury?
Once again you are lying. Or, were you lying then? Which is it?Heiwa, have you at some point in the past suffered a significant head injury?
No, the head band I carry is just for good appearance.
I wasn't actually thinking of the headband, it was more your general behaviour.Heiwa, have you at some point in the past suffered a significant head injury?
No, the head band I carry is just for good appearance.
I wasn't actually thinking of the headband, it was more your general behaviour.Heiwa, have you at some point in the past suffered a significant head injury?
No, the head band I carry is just for good appearance.
I wasn't actually thinking of the headband, it was more your general behaviour.Heiwa, have you at some point in the past suffered a significant head injury?
No, the head band I carry is just for good appearance.
And what about my general behaviour? Anything wrong with my web site <> ? All info there is correct, as far as I am concerned.
Thanks for asking. Please study:Wow, a lot in there, a good resource for space criticism.
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw2.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel2.htm
Only twerps believe in human space travel. Prove me wrong and collect €1M!
http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm
Hey HeiwaI acually answer your question at http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm , but as you are afraid to study it I will shortly repeat:
...
So my next question is this. Given your stance on nuclear weapons or nuclear power. Are the 'disasters' at Chernobyl and Fukushima vastly overstated? Is it actually safe to go there? Did the government stage the disasters for some other nefarious plot? I see pictures come out of Chernobyl and Fukushima of lush plant life and vegetation as well as animals who seem to look in perfect health. Yet we are told we will die horribly if we go anywhere near there. Please tell me if you think it is safe, fake or a real danger withouttelling us about your website. I'm trying to give you the opportunity to demonstrate to everyone here that you are a real person with intelligence and not a mindless bot. What are your thought on this?
No, I am an engineer working with seagoing ships. I explain it at my web site.Thanks for asking. Please study:Wow, a lot in there, a good resource for space criticism.
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw2.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel2.htm
Only twerps believe in human space travel. Prove me wrong and collect €1M!
http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm
Are you a planarist?
I meant flat earth proponent (aka planarist)No, I am an engineer working with seagoing ships. I explain it at my web site.Thanks for asking. Please study:Wow, a lot in there, a good resource for space criticism.
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw2.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel2.htm
Only twerps believe in human space travel. Prove me wrong and collect €1M!
http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm
Are you a planarist?
Earth is >70% covered by water and it is not flat. Ever been to sea? Been seasick? Been on a cheap cruise?I meant flat earth proponent (aka planarist)No, I am an engineer working with seagoing ships. I explain it at my web site.Thanks for asking. Please study:Wow, a lot in there, a good resource for space criticism.
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw2.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel2.htm
Only twerps believe in human space travel. Prove me wrong and collect €1M!
http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm
Are you a planarist?
I've been on this forum called The Flat Earth Society, which has Flat Earth proponents on it.Earth is >70% covered by water and it is not flat. Ever been to sea? Been seasick? Been on a cheap cruise?I meant flat earth proponent (aka planarist)No, I am an engineer working with seagoing ships. I explain it at my web site.Thanks for asking. Please study:Wow, a lot in there, a good resource for space criticism.
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw2.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel2.htm
Only twerps believe in human space travel. Prove me wrong and collect €1M!
http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm
Are you a planarist?
But was the cruise on a flat sea? I have never seen a flat sea!I've been on this forum called The Flat Earth Society, which has Flat Earth proponents on it.Earth is >70% covered by water and it is not flat. Ever been to sea? Been seasick? Been on a cheap cruise?I meant flat earth proponent (aka planarist)No, I am an engineer working with seagoing ships. I explain it at my web site.Thanks for asking. Please study:Wow, a lot in there, a good resource for space criticism.
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw2.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel2.htm
Only twerps believe in human space travel. Prove me wrong and collect €1M!
http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm
Are you a planarist?
I've also been on a cruise in Hawaii, it was great.
I didn't pay enough attention to that, it was in my young boy days. How would I tell the difference?But was the cruise on a flat sea? I have never seen a flat sea!I've been on this forum called The Flat Earth Society, which has Flat Earth proponents on it.Earth is >70% covered by water and it is not flat. Ever been to sea? Been seasick? Been on a cheap cruise?I meant flat earth proponent (aka planarist)No, I am an engineer working with seagoing ships. I explain it at my web site.Thanks for asking. Please study:Wow, a lot in there, a good resource for space criticism.
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw2.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel2.htm
Only twerps believe in human space travel. Prove me wrong and collect €1M!
http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm
Are you a planarist?
I've also been on a cruise in Hawaii, it was great.
Look out through a window/porthole. If the horizon is moving, the sea is not flat.I didn't pay enough attention to that, it was in my young boy days. How would I tell the difference?But was the cruise on a flat sea? I have never seen a flat sea!I've been on this forum called The Flat Earth Society, which has Flat Earth proponents on it.Earth is >70% covered by water and it is not flat. Ever been to sea? Been seasick? Been on a cheap cruise?I meant flat earth proponent (aka planarist)No, I am an engineer working with seagoing ships. I explain it at my web site.Thanks for asking. Please study:Wow, a lot in there, a good resource for space criticism.
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw2.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel2.htm
Only twerps believe in human space travel. Prove me wrong and collect €1M!
http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm
Are you a planarist?
I've also been on a cruise in Hawaii, it was great.
I don't see the horizon move no matter where I am at.Look out through a window/porthole. If the horizon is moving, the sea is not flat.I didn't pay enough attention to that, it was in my young boy days. How would I tell the difference?But was the cruise on a flat sea? I have never seen a flat sea!I've been on this forum called The Flat Earth Society, which has Flat Earth proponents on it.Earth is >70% covered by water and it is not flat. Ever been to sea? Been seasick? Been on a cheap cruise?I meant flat earth proponent (aka planarist)No, I am an engineer working with seagoing ships. I explain it at my web site.Thanks for asking. Please study:Wow, a lot in there, a good resource for space criticism.
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw2.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel2.htm
Only twerps believe in human space travel. Prove me wrong and collect €1M!
http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm
Are you a planarist?
I've also been on a cruise in Hawaii, it was great.
I don't see the horizon move no matter where I am at.Look out through a window/porthole. If the horizon is moving, the sea is not flat.I didn't pay enough attention to that, it was in my young boy days. How would I tell the difference?But was the cruise on a flat sea? I have never seen a flat sea!I've been on this forum called The Flat Earth Society, which has Flat Earth proponents on it.Earth is >70% covered by water and it is not flat. Ever been to sea? Been seasick? Been on a cheap cruise?I meant flat earth proponent (aka planarist)No, I am an engineer working with seagoing ships. I explain it at my web site.Thanks for asking. Please study:Wow, a lot in there, a good resource for space criticism.
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw2.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel2.htm
Only twerps believe in human space travel. Prove me wrong and collect €1M!
http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm
Are you a planarist?
I've also been on a cruise in Hawaii, it was great.
Does it not not being flat mean the sea is flat then?
I have read the Apollo focused ones.Thanks for asking. Please study:Wow, a lot in there, a good resource for space criticism.
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw2.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel2.htm
Only twerps believe in human space travel. Prove me wrong and collect €1M!
http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm
Are you a planarist?
I have read the Apollo focused ones.Thanks for asking. Please study:Wow, a lot in there, a good resource for space criticism.
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw2.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel2.htm
Only twerps believe in human space travel. Prove me wrong and collect €1M!
http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm
Are you a planarist?
They are utter bonkers.
Lies, misinformation and plain misunderstanding of the program and basic aspects of it, like lightning and photography.
I and others have pointed out many flaws. He has yet to change anything.
Raise of hands, who has actually gone to Heiwa's website?
I personally refuse to go...
Raise of hands, who has actually gone to Heiwa's website?Does Heiwa have a website? I would never have guessed.
I personally refuse to go...
http://heiwaco.com just click on it!Raise of hands, who has actually gone to Heiwa's website?Does Heiwa have a website? I would never have guessed.
I personally refuse to go...
<>just click on it!Raise of hands, who has actually gone to Heiwa's website?Does Heiwa have a website? I would never have guessed.
I personally refuse to go...
Just ask Google!<>just click on it!Raise of hands, who has actually gone to Heiwa's website?Does Heiwa have a website? I would never have guessed.
I personally refuse to go...
Heiwa has a website? how in the world do you find it?
Just ask Google!<>just click on it!Raise of hands, who has actually gone to Heiwa's website?Does Heiwa have a website? I would never have guessed.
I personally refuse to go...
Heiwa has a website? how in the world do you find it?
If he didn't constantly spam it then he wouldn't be able to get all excited about the paltry number of hits from the bots that follow the links.Just ask Google!<>just click on it!Raise of hands, who has actually gone to Heiwa's website?Does Heiwa have a website? I would never have guessed.
I personally refuse to go...
Heiwa has a website? how in the world do you find it?
Right. 'Cause it sure isn't spammed in every other post you make or anything like that.
If he didn't constantly spam it then he wouldn't be able to get all excited about the paltry number of hits from the bots that follow the links.Just ask Google!<>just click on it!Raise of hands, who has actually gone to Heiwa's website?Does Heiwa have a website? I would never have guessed.
I personally refuse to go...
Heiwa has a website? how in the world do you find it?
Right. 'Cause it sure isn't spammed in every other post you make or anything like that.
Nobody believes you're smart enough to operate the software correctly. More lies from Heiwa.If he didn't constantly spam it then he wouldn't be able to get all excited about the paltry number of hits from the bots that follow the links.Just ask Google!<>just click on it!Raise of hands, who has actually gone to Heiwa's website?Does Heiwa have a website? I would never have guessed.
I personally refuse to go...
Heiwa has a website? how in the world do you find it?
Right. 'Cause it sure isn't spammed in every other post you make or anything like that.
Hm, the software checking hits of my website ignore search engine bots of all kind. But plenty bots check what I write to assist people to find me.
I think it's one of those hidden dark web things. Nobody really knows how to get there.<>just click on it!Raise of hands, who has actually gone to Heiwa's website?Does Heiwa have a website? I would never have guessed.
I personally refuse to go...
Heiwa has a website? how in the world do you find it?
Well, I have plenty visitors and contacts with them via the web. That's one purpose of my site, which doesn't cost me much. In the old times I had to print and distribute books. Today the books, etc, are all free at http://heiwaco.com .Nobody believes you're smart enough to operate the software correctly. More lies from Heiwa.If he didn't constantly spam it then he wouldn't be able to get all excited about the paltry number of hits from the bots that follow the links.Just ask Google!<>just click on it!Raise of hands, who has actually gone to Heiwa's website?Does Heiwa have a website? I would never have guessed.
I personally refuse to go...
Heiwa has a website? how in the world do you find it?
Right. 'Cause it sure isn't spammed in every other post you make or anything like that.
Hm, the software checking hits of my website ignore search engine bots of all kind. But plenty bots check what I write to assist people to find me.
At those numbers your site has gotten less hits since it started than most sites get in a week. Since archive.org has your site logged, your software doesn't root out all bots. Beyond the few hits from people here and search bots nobody reads your site so stop pretending.If he didn't constantly spam it then he wouldn't be able to get all excited about the paltry number of hits from the bots that follow the links.Just ask Google!<>just click on it!Raise of hands, who has actually gone to Heiwa's website?Does Heiwa have a website? I would never have guessed.
I personally refuse to go...
Heiwa has a website? how in the world do you find it?
Right. 'Cause it sure isn't spammed in every other post you make or anything like that.
Hm, the software checking hits of my website ignore search engine bots of all kind. But plenty bots check what I write to assist people to find me.
Yet another statement you can't back up. PROVE you have "plenty visitors and contacts with them via the web". Bet you can't and won't.Well, I have plenty visitors and contacts with them via the web. That's one purpose of my site, which doesn't cost me much. In the old times I had to print and distribute books. Today the books, etc, are all free at http://heiwaco.com .Nobody believes you're smart enough to operate the software correctly. More lies from Heiwa.If he didn't constantly spam it then he wouldn't be able to get all excited about the paltry number of hits from the bots that follow the links.Just ask Google!<>just click on it!Raise of hands, who has actually gone to Heiwa's website?Does Heiwa have a website? I would never have guessed.
I personally refuse to go...
Heiwa has a website? how in the world do you find it?
Right. 'Cause it sure isn't spammed in every other post you make or anything like that.
Hm, the software checking hits of my website ignore search engine bots of all kind. But plenty bots check what I write to assist people to find me.
Reason is that I am very smart,Not based on what you post here and elsewhere.
good looking,debatable.
rich,Yet another statement you've yet to back up.
healthy,Is that not counting your admitted brain damage?
funIt is fun laughing at you. You are trying to be a joke, right?
and nice, etc.directly contradicted by your continued insults of others in nearly ever post. More LIES from Heiwa.
Twerps hate me for it but they are not perfect ... like me.LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!
Do you play tennis? Let's have a game, any time.and the non sequitur of the month award goes to...
Just ask Google!<>just click on it!Raise of hands, who has actually gone to Heiwa's website?Does Heiwa have a website? I would never have guessed.
I personally refuse to go...
Heiwa has a website? how in the world do you find it?
Well, plenty women here disagree!good looking,debatable.
Yet another statement you can't and won't back up. Maybe its your admitted brain damage? And we're not asking your whores, it is debatable here.Well, plenty women here disagree!good looking,debatable.
Pls, do not assume anything unless you are brain damaged. Do like me. Play mixed double tennis with nice women! Get out in the fresh air and exercise!Yet another statement you can't and won't back up. Maybe its your admitted brain damage? And we're not asking your whores, it is debatable here.Well, plenty women here disagree!good looking,debatable.
Noted that you ignored the rest of the post. Can we assume you agree the rest is more lies of yours?
ITT: Anders admits to being a dirty old man.Well, plenty women here disagree!good looking,debatable.
Avoiding the question and attempting non sequitur. Conclusion: Anders knows he is lying.Pls, do not assume anything unless you are brain damaged. Do like me. Play mixed double tennis with nice women! Get out in the fresh air and exercise!Yet another statement you can't and won't back up. Maybe its your admitted brain damage? And we're not asking your whores, it is debatable here.Well, plenty women here disagree!good looking,debatable.
Noted that you ignored the rest of the post. Can we assume you agree the rest is more lies of yours?
Avoiding the question and attempting non sequitur. Conclusion: Anders knows he is lying.Pls, do not assume anything unless you are brain damaged. Do like me. Play mixed double tennis with nice women! Get out in the fresh air and exercise!Yet another statement you can't and won't back up. Maybe its your admitted brain damage? And we're not asking your whores, it is debatable here.Well, plenty women here disagree!good looking,debatable.
Noted that you ignored the rest of the post. Can we assume you agree the rest is more lies of yours?
Avoiding the question and attempting non sequitur. Conclusion: Anders knows he is lying.Pls, do not assume anything unless you are brain damaged. Do like me. Play mixed double tennis with nice women! Get out in the fresh air and exercise!Yet another statement you can't and won't back up. Maybe its your admitted brain damage? And we're not asking your whores, it is debatable here.Well, plenty women here disagree!good looking,debatable.
Noted that you ignored the rest of the post. Can we assume you agree the rest is more lies of yours?
Heiwa, how do you get the chocolate in the middle like that?No idea. My machine just produce one cup of coffee. At a time. And it is time for it.
And anders proves he is unable to read. How sad for him.Avoiding the question and attempting non sequitur. Conclusion: Anders knows he is lying.Pls, do not assume anything unless you are brain damaged. Do like me. Play mixed double tennis with nice women! Get out in the fresh air and exercise!Yet another statement you can't and won't back up. Maybe its your admitted brain damage? And we're not asking your whores, it is debatable here.Well, plenty women here disagree!good looking,debatable.
Noted that you ignored the rest of the post. Can we assume you agree the rest is more lies of yours?
What question did I avoid? The one about brain damage? Maybe I missed it?
And anders proves he is unable to read. How sad for him.Avoiding the question and attempting non sequitur. Conclusion: Anders knows he is lying.Pls, do not assume anything unless you are brain damaged. Do like me. Play mixed double tennis with nice women! Get out in the fresh air and exercise!Yet another statement you can't and won't back up. Maybe its your admitted brain damage? And we're not asking your whores, it is debatable here.Well, plenty women here disagree!good looking,debatable.
Noted that you ignored the rest of the post. Can we assume you agree the rest is more lies of yours?
What question did I avoid? The one about brain damage? Maybe I missed it?
Anything? Why do you lie so much? You've been caught in many lies on this forum and others so don't try to deny it.And anders proves he is unable to read. How sad for him.Avoiding the question and attempting non sequitur. Conclusion: Anders knows he is lying.Pls, do not assume anything unless you are brain damaged. Do like me. Play mixed double tennis with nice women! Get out in the fresh air and exercise!Yet another statement you can't and won't back up. Maybe its your admitted brain damage? And we're not asking your whores, it is debatable here.Well, plenty women here disagree!good looking,debatable.
Noted that you ignored the rest of the post. Can we assume you agree the rest is more lies of yours?
What question did I avoid? The one about brain damage? Maybe I missed it?
But I can read! Am I not happy. But I missed your question. In this thread you can ask me anything.
Thanks for your theory and opinion. You sound like a twerp. Re question, I never lie. Why do you suggest it? Aha, you are a twerp.Anything? Why do you lie so much? You've been caught in many lies on this forum and others so don't try to deny it.And anders proves he is unable to read. How sad for him.Avoiding the question and attempting non sequitur. Conclusion: Anders knows he is lying.Pls, do not assume anything unless you are brain damaged. Do like me. Play mixed double tennis with nice women! Get out in the fresh air and exercise!Yet another statement you can't and won't back up. Maybe its your admitted brain damage? And we're not asking your whores, it is debatable here.Well, plenty women here disagree!good looking,debatable.
Noted that you ignored the rest of the post. Can we assume you agree the rest is more lies of yours?
What question did I avoid? The one about brain damage? Maybe I missed it?
But I can read! Am I not happy. But I missed your question. In this thread you can ask me anything.
My theory is you're a narcissistic pathological liar and you're very lonely which is why you keep spamming your site and resurrecting dead threads.
You claim to be nice then insult in nearly every post. So that is a lie and it has been pointed out before. Now you are lying about never lying. More LIES from Heiwa. But it does support the narcissist theory.Thanks for your theory and opinion. You sound like a twerp. Re question, I never lie. Why do you suggest it? Aha, you are a twerp.Anything? Why do you lie so much? You've been caught in many lies on this forum and others so don't try to deny it.And anders proves he is unable to read. How sad for him.Avoiding the question and attempting non sequitur. Conclusion: Anders knows he is lying.Pls, do not assume anything unless you are brain damaged. Do like me. Play mixed double tennis with nice women! Get out in the fresh air and exercise!Yet another statement you can't and won't back up. Maybe its your admitted brain damage? And we're not asking your whores, it is debatable here.Well, plenty women here disagree!good looking,debatable.
Noted that you ignored the rest of the post. Can we assume you agree the rest is more lies of yours?
What question did I avoid? The one about brain damage? Maybe I missed it?
But I can read! Am I not happy. But I missed your question. In this thread you can ask me anything.
My theory is you're a narcissistic pathological liar and you're very lonely which is why you keep spamming your site and resurrecting dead threads.
Does this type of post make you happy?You claim to be nice then insult in nearly every post. So that is a lie and it has been pointed out before. Now you are lying about never lying. More LIES from Heiwa. But it does support the narcissist theory.Thanks for your theory and opinion. You sound like a twerp. Re question, I never lie. Why do you suggest it? Aha, you are a twerp.Anything? Why do you lie so much? You've been caught in many lies on this forum and others so don't try to deny it.And anders proves he is unable to read. How sad for him.Avoiding the question and attempting non sequitur. Conclusion: Anders knows he is lying.Pls, do not assume anything unless you are brain damaged. Do like me. Play mixed double tennis with nice women! Get out in the fresh air and exercise!Yet another statement you can't and won't back up. Maybe its your admitted brain damage? And we're not asking your whores, it is debatable here.Well, plenty women here disagree!good looking,debatable.
Noted that you ignored the rest of the post. Can we assume you agree the rest is more lies of yours?
What question did I avoid? The one about brain damage? Maybe I missed it?
But I can read! Am I not happy. But I missed your question. In this thread you can ask me anything.
My theory is you're a narcissistic pathological liar and you're very lonely which is why you keep spamming your site and resurrecting dead threads.
Exposing your many lies so that it makes it harder for you to deceive? Why wouldn't it? Stop lying and I'll stop calling you a liar.Does this type of post make you happy?You claim to be nice then insult in nearly every post. So that is a lie and it has been pointed out before. Now you are lying about never lying. More LIES from Heiwa. But it does support the narcissist theory.Thanks for your theory and opinion. You sound like a twerp. Re question, I never lie. Why do you suggest it? Aha, you are a twerp.Anything? Why do you lie so much? You've been caught in many lies on this forum and others so don't try to deny it.And anders proves he is unable to read. How sad for him.Avoiding the question and attempting non sequitur. Conclusion: Anders knows he is lying.Pls, do not assume anything unless you are brain damaged. Do like me. Play mixed double tennis with nice women! Get out in the fresh air and exercise!Yet another statement you can't and won't back up. Maybe its your admitted brain damage? And we're not asking your whores, it is debatable here.Well, plenty women here disagree!good looking,debatable.
Noted that you ignored the rest of the post. Can we assume you agree the rest is more lies of yours?
What question did I avoid? The one about brain damage? Maybe I missed it?
But I can read! Am I not happy. But I missed your question. In this thread you can ask me anything.
My theory is you're a narcissistic pathological liar and you're very lonely which is why you keep spamming your site and resurrecting dead threads.
It’s not a suggestion. You’ve been caught lying so many times it’s easy to point them out to you. Here’s a couple of examples.Thanks for your theory and opinion. You sound like a twerp. Re question, I never lie. Why do you suggest it? Aha, you are a twerp.Anything? Why do you lie so much? You've been caught in many lies on this forum and others so don't try to deny it.And anders proves he is unable to read. How sad for him.Avoiding the question and attempting non sequitur. Conclusion: Anders knows he is lying.Pls, do not assume anything unless you are brain damaged. Do like me. Play mixed double tennis with nice women! Get out in the fresh air and exercise!Yet another statement you can't and won't back up. Maybe its your admitted brain damage? And we're not asking your whores, it is debatable here.Well, plenty women here disagree!good looking,debatable.
Noted that you ignored the rest of the post. Can we assume you agree the rest is more lies of yours?
What question did I avoid? The one about brain damage? Maybe I missed it?
But I can read! Am I not happy. But I missed your question. In this thread you can ask me anything.
My theory is you're a narcissistic pathological liar and you're very lonely which is why you keep spamming your site and resurrecting dead threads.
Reason is that I am very smart, good looking, rich, healthy, fun and nice, etc. Twerps hate me for it but they are not perfect ... like me.
Do you play tennis? Let's have a game, any time.
Since this a heiwa AMA,Thanks for asking. All is explained at my popular website http://heiwaco.com .
Anders do you really believe that you simply claiming something is impossible is actually explaining why it is impossible?
I ask because even though you claim to explain everything at that horrible website of yours all you ever do is say, but of course that's impossible.
In your mind is that really explaining it?
No, nothing is actually explained, that's the point of the question. You just say, of course that is impossible.Since this a heiwa AMA,Thanks for asking. All is explained at my popular website http://heiwaco.com .
Anders do you really believe that you simply claiming something is impossible is actually explaining why it is impossible?
I ask because even though you claim to explain everything at that horrible website of yours all you ever do is say, but of course that's impossible.
In your mind is that really explaining it?
Nuclear weapons, human space travel, bow visor falling off a ship, Arabs landing in skyscrapers and fusion on Earth are hoaxes invented by criminals using pseudoscience. Using simple critical thinking anyone should agree.
No, nothing is actually explained, that's the point of the question. You just say, of course that is impossible.Since this a heiwa AMA,Thanks for asking. All is explained at my popular website http://heiwaco.com .
Anders do you really believe that you simply claiming something is impossible is actually explaining why it is impossible?
I ask because even though you claim to explain everything at that horrible website of yours all you ever do is say, but of course that's impossible.
In your mind is that really explaining it?
Nuclear weapons, human space travel, bow visor falling off a ship, Arabs landing in skyscrapers and fusion on Earth are hoaxes invented by criminals using pseudoscience. Using simple critical thinking anyone should agree.
But thanks for the answer, we now know that you do in fact believe that is an explanation.
Which just makes you a sad, crazy, old man. Thanks for the confirmation.
We understand your explanations. You're just wrong.No, nothing is actually explained, that's the point of the question. You just say, of course that is impossible.Since this a heiwa AMA,Thanks for asking. All is explained at my popular website http://heiwaco.com .
Anders do you really believe that you simply claiming something is impossible is actually explaining why it is impossible?
I ask because even though you claim to explain everything at that horrible website of yours all you ever do is say, but of course that's impossible.
In your mind is that really explaining it?
Nuclear weapons, human space travel, bow visor falling off a ship, Arabs landing in skyscrapers and fusion on Earth are hoaxes invented by criminals using pseudoscience. Using simple critical thinking anyone should agree.
But thanks for the answer, we now know that you do in fact believe that is an explanation.
Which just makes you a sad, crazy, old man. Thanks for the confirmation.
I am sorry that you couldn't understand my explanations. Plenty other people do, which makes me happy.
Heiwa how does your dong rate, small,medium,large or extra large? We must know.Knowing Heiwa the answer will be extra extra large and he's got two.
Heiwa how does your dong rate, small,medium,large or extra large? We must know.Knowing Heiwa the answer will be extra extra large and he's got two.
Heiwa how does your dong rate, small,medium,large or extra large? We must know.Knowing Heiwa the answer will be extra extra large and he's got two.
Legend has it that in the early days of the US manned space program, condoms with tubes attached were used as part of the astronaut's urine collection system. The condoms came in small, medium and large sizes. Being the macho fighter jocks they were, none of the astronauts would choose small or medium, even if they were the appropriate sizes. To ensure a proper fit, the engineers changed the sizes to large, extra large and jumbo.Heiwa how does your dong rate, small,medium,large or extra large? We must know.Knowing Heiwa the answer will be extra extra large and he's got two.
No, you didn't understand my explanations about nuclear weapons, human space travel, bow visor falling off a ship, Arabs landing in skyscrapers and fusion on Earth. You are just a brainwashed twerp!We understand your explanations. You're just wrong.No, nothing is actually explained, that's the point of the question. You just say, of course that is impossible.Since this a heiwa AMA,Thanks for asking. All is explained at my popular website http://heiwaco.com .
Anders do you really believe that you simply claiming something is impossible is actually explaining why it is impossible?
I ask because even though you claim to explain everything at that horrible website of yours all you ever do is say, but of course that's impossible.
In your mind is that really explaining it?
Nuclear weapons, human space travel, bow visor falling off a ship, Arabs landing in skyscrapers and fusion on Earth are hoaxes invented by criminals using pseudoscience. Using simple critical thinking anyone should agree.
But thanks for the answer, we now know that you do in fact believe that is an explanation.
Which just makes you a sad, crazy, old man. Thanks for the confirmation.
I am sorry that you couldn't understand my explanations. Plenty other people do, which makes me happy.
You’re just too funny. Reactor operation, reactor plant system design/analysis, reactor plant maintenance, and radiological controls is what I’ve done for a living for most of my adult life. Compared to you, that makes me an expert.No, you didn't understand my explanations about nuclear weapons, human space travel, bow visor falling off a ship, Arabs landing in skyscrapers and fusion on Earth. You are just a brainwashed twerp!We understand your explanations. You're just wrong.No, nothing is actually explained, that's the point of the question. You just say, of course that is impossible.Since this a heiwa AMA,Thanks for asking. All is explained at my popular website http://heiwaco.com .
Anders do you really believe that you simply claiming something is impossible is actually explaining why it is impossible?
I ask because even though you claim to explain everything at that horrible website of yours all you ever do is say, but of course that's impossible.
In your mind is that really explaining it?
Nuclear weapons, human space travel, bow visor falling off a ship, Arabs landing in skyscrapers and fusion on Earth are hoaxes invented by criminals using pseudoscience. Using simple critical thinking anyone should agree.
But thanks for the answer, we now know that you do in fact believe that is an explanation.
Which just makes you a sad, crazy, old man. Thanks for the confirmation.
I am sorry that you couldn't understand my explanations. Plenty other people do, which makes me happy.
<snip>
Your reputation is summed up in your signature. Your explainations can be summed up with, but of course that's impossible.No, you didn't understand my explanations about nuclear weapons, human space travel, bow visor falling off a ship, Arabs landing in skyscrapers and fusion on Earth. You are just a brainwashed twerp!We understand your explanations. You're just wrong.No, nothing is actually explained, that's the point of the question. You just say, of course that is impossible.Since this a heiwa AMA,Thanks for asking. All is explained at my popular website http://heiwaco.com .
Anders do you really believe that you simply claiming something is impossible is actually explaining why it is impossible?
I ask because even though you claim to explain everything at that horrible website of yours all you ever do is say, but of course that's impossible.
In your mind is that really explaining it?
Nuclear weapons, human space travel, bow visor falling off a ship, Arabs landing in skyscrapers and fusion on Earth are hoaxes invented by criminals using pseudoscience. Using simple critical thinking anyone should agree.
But thanks for the answer, we now know that you do in fact believe that is an explanation.
Which just makes you a sad, crazy, old man. Thanks for the confirmation.
I am sorry that you couldn't understand my explanations. Plenty other people do, which makes me happy.
Example - if a ship with (or without) a bow visor is going too fast in rough weather at night, it will sooner or later impact a wave. The impact is heard and felt as if hit by canon ball and everyone aboard is awoken. And you slow down. A bow visor cannor fall off a ship at sea even if the Prime minister says so and experts of all kind agree. I describe it at my website. I should know. I am a safety at sea expert with a very good reputation.
You sound like a twerp - badxtoss.Your reputation is summed up in your signature. Your explainations can be summed up with, but of course that's impossible.No, you didn't understand my explanations about nuclear weapons, human space travel, bow visor falling off a ship, Arabs landing in skyscrapers and fusion on Earth. You are just a brainwashed twerp!We understand your explanations. You're just wrong.No, nothing is actually explained, that's the point of the question. You just say, of course that is impossible.Since this a heiwa AMA,Thanks for asking. All is explained at my popular website http://heiwaco.com .
Anders do you really believe that you simply claiming something is impossible is actually explaining why it is impossible?
I ask because even though you claim to explain everything at that horrible website of yours all you ever do is say, but of course that's impossible.
In your mind is that really explaining it?
Nuclear weapons, human space travel, bow visor falling off a ship, Arabs landing in skyscrapers and fusion on Earth are hoaxes invented by criminals using pseudoscience. Using simple critical thinking anyone should agree.
But thanks for the answer, we now know that you do in fact believe that is an explanation.
Which just makes you a sad, crazy, old man. Thanks for the confirmation.
I am sorry that you couldn't understand my explanations. Plenty other people do, which makes me happy.
Example - if a ship with (or without) a bow visor is going too fast in rough weather at night, it will sooner or later impact a wave. The impact is heard and felt as if hit by canon ball and everyone aboard is awoken. And you slow down. A bow visor cannor fall off a ship at sea even if the Prime minister says so and experts of all kind agree. I describe it at my website. I should know. I am a safety at sea expert with a very good reputation.
You are just a sick old idiot spreading lies in hopes that you will be noticed.
And yet you fail to refute anything I said. That's because you know I am right. We can always tell when you realize someone else is right, you call them a twerp. It's actually kind of funny.You sound like a twerp - badxtoss.Your reputation is summed up in your signature. Your explainations can be summed up with, but of course that's impossible.No, you didn't understand my explanations about nuclear weapons, human space travel, bow visor falling off a ship, Arabs landing in skyscrapers and fusion on Earth. You are just a brainwashed twerp!We understand your explanations. You're just wrong.No, nothing is actually explained, that's the point of the question. You just say, of course that is impossible.Since this a heiwa AMA,Thanks for asking. All is explained at my popular website http://heiwaco.com .
Anders do you really believe that you simply claiming something is impossible is actually explaining why it is impossible?
I ask because even though you claim to explain everything at that horrible website of yours all you ever do is say, but of course that's impossible.
In your mind is that really explaining it?
Nuclear weapons, human space travel, bow visor falling off a ship, Arabs landing in skyscrapers and fusion on Earth are hoaxes invented by criminals using pseudoscience. Using simple critical thinking anyone should agree.
But thanks for the answer, we now know that you do in fact believe that is an explanation.
Which just makes you a sad, crazy, old man. Thanks for the confirmation.
I am sorry that you couldn't understand my explanations. Plenty other people do, which makes me happy.
Example - if a ship with (or without) a bow visor is going too fast in rough weather at night, it will sooner or later impact a wave. The impact is heard and felt as if hit by canon ball and everyone aboard is awoken. And you slow down. A bow visor cannor fall off a ship at sea even if the Prime minister says so and experts of all kind agree. I describe it at my website. I should know. I am a safety at sea expert with a very good reputation.
You are just a sick old idiot spreading lies in hopes that you will be noticed.
No, you didn't understand my explanations about nuclear weapons, human space travel, bow visor falling off a ship, Arabs landing in skyscrapers and fusion on Earth. You are just a brainwashed twerp!At least we understand the difference between landing a plane in a skyscraper and crashing a plane into a skyscraper.
You want to see Heiwa park a car.No, you didn't understand my explanations about nuclear weapons, human space travel, bow visor falling off a ship, Arabs landing in skyscrapers and fusion on Earth. You are just a brainwashed twerp!At least we understand the difference between landing a plane in a skyscraper and crashing a plane into a skyscraper.
No, you didn't understand my explanations about nuclear weapons, human space travel, bow visor falling off a ship, Arabs landing in skyscrapers and fusion on Earth. You are just a brainwashed twerp!At least we understand the difference between landing a plane in a skyscraper and crashing a plane into a skyscraper.
You’re just too funny. Reactor operation, reactor plant system design/analysis, reactor plant maintenance, and radiological controls is what I’ve done for a living for most of my adult life. Compared to you, that makes me an expert.
I really can’t critique your assessment of bow visor accidents because it’s not my primary area of engineering. Unlike you, I can admit I don’t know everything. AAMOF, there’s so much I don’t know and it’s my goal to try to learn something new every day. You however, believe yourself to be the consummate expert in everything from engineering to quantum mechanics...proof of just how delusional you are.
The fact is I’ve forgotten more about reactor theory than you’ve ever known in your entire life. I know for a fact that you descriptions of nuclear reactors, weapons, and radiation are just plain wrong.
Others more knowledgeable than I have debunked your 9/11 theories to the point you were even disavowed by AE for 9/11 truth. When they figured out how much a nutjob on a stick you were they removed your profile, removed you as a petitioner, and removed the page naming you petitioner of the month. Even you’re peers want nothing to do with your crackpot conspiracy theories.
Most of your webpages are just you drawing conclusions based other people’s research. There is almost nothing that could be called research originated by you. There are no interviews with people involved or with eyewitnesses. There are no documents or papers you obtained via FOI requests or direct research. You’ve mostly created an anthology of other people’s work that you base your pathetic conclusions on.
You’ve been caught lying so many times there are several sites with webpages dedicated to showing your own contradictory posts. You’ve caught quietly making changes to your website when you’ve been proved wrong. Of course you’ve never acknowledged being wrong...that little million euro thing. There are also forum threads pointing out those changes. That pesky internet archive site has all the previous versions and was a good source for those threads and something you can hide from.
All your lies, all your contradictions, and your lack of understanding of some basic physics (makes me wonder if you really are an engineer) have all gotten you banned from more forums than some people are even members of.
And, don’t even think about bringing up your stupid hundreds of visitors a day thing. At that rate, even the forum where I’m a moderator which has very low traffic has more visitors in a month than your site has had in its entire existence...and, my forum is in the bottom 5% for webpage traffic. Compared to that metric you site doesn’t even make it to the bottom one tenth of one percent. Some of those visits aren’t even real people. They’re just bots. Don’t tell us how your software can tell bots from people because the fact that archive.org has so many different versions of your site archived is proof it doesn’t catch them all. So no, your site is not “wildly popular”, it’s just pathetic.
The fact is you have zero credibility and everyone know it.
Mike
You’re just too funny. Reactor operation, reactor plant system design/analysis, reactor plant maintenance, and radiological controls is what I’ve done for a living for most of my adult life. Compared to you, that makes me an expert.No, you didn't understand my explanations about nuclear weapons, human space travel, bow visor falling off a ship, Arabs landing in skyscrapers and fusion on Earth. You are just a brainwashed twerp!We understand your explanations. You're just wrong.No, nothing is actually explained, that's the point of the question. You just say, of course that is impossible.Since this a heiwa AMA,Thanks for asking. All is explained at my popular website http://heiwaco.com .
Anders do you really believe that you simply claiming something is impossible is actually explaining why it is impossible?
I ask because even though you claim to explain everything at that horrible website of yours all you ever do is say, but of course that's impossible.
In your mind is that really explaining it?
Nuclear weapons, human space travel, bow visor falling off a ship, Arabs landing in skyscrapers and fusion on Earth are hoaxes invented by criminals using pseudoscience. Using simple critical thinking anyone should agree.
But thanks for the answer, we now know that you do in fact believe that is an explanation.
Which just makes you a sad, crazy, old man. Thanks for the confirmation.
I am sorry that you couldn't understand my explanations. Plenty other people do, which makes me happy.
<snip>
I really can’t critique your assessment of bow visor accidents because it’s not my primary area of engineering. Unlike you, I can admit I don’t know everything. AAMOF, there’s so much I don’t know and it’s my goal to try to learn something new every day. You however, believe yourself to be the consummate expert in everything from engineering to quantum mechanics...proof of just how delusional you are.
The fact is I’ve forgotten more about reactor theory than you’ve ever known in your entire life. I know for a fact that you descriptions of nuclear reactors, weapons, and radiation are just plain wrong.
Others more knowledgeable than I have debunked your 9/11 theories to the point you were even disavowed by AE for 9/11 truth. When they figured out how much a nutjob on a stick you were they removed your profile, removed you as a petitioner, and removed the page naming you petitioner of the month. Even you’re peers want nothing to do with your crackpot conspiracy theories.
Most of your webpages are just you drawing conclusions based other people’s research. There is almost nothing that could be called research originated by you. There are no interviews with people involved or with eyewitnesses. There are no documents or papers you obtained via FOI requests or direct research. You’ve mostly created an anthology of other people’s work that you base your pathetic conclusions on.
You’ve been caught lying so many times there are several sites with webpages dedicated to showing your own contradictory posts. You’ve caught quietly making changes to your website when you’ve been proved wrong. Of course you’ve never acknowledged being wrong...that little million euro thing. There are also forum threads pointing out those changes. That pesky internet archive site has all the previous versions and was a good source for those threads and something you can hide from.
All your lies, all your contradictions, and your lack of understanding of some basic physics (makes me wonder if you really are an engineer) have all gotten you banned from more forums than some people are even members of.
And, don’t even think about bringing up your stupid hundreds of visitors a day thing. At that rate, even the forum where I’m a moderator which has very low traffic has more visitors in a month than your site has had in its entire existence...and, my forum is in the bottom 5% for webpage traffic. Compared to that metric you site doesn’t even make it to the bottom one tenth of one percent. Some of those visits aren’t even real people. They’re just bots. Don’t tell us how your software can tell bots from people because the fact that archive.org has so many different versions of your site archived is proof it doesn’t catch them all. So no, your site is not “wildly popular”, it’s just pathetic.
The fact is you have zero credibility and everyone know it.
Mike
"I really can’t critique your assessment of bow visor accidents because it’s not my primary area of engineering".You should study the matter like I did 1994.
Only a twerp would think that someone would try to land a plane in a skyscraper at over 500 mph.No, you didn't understand my explanations about nuclear weapons, human space travel, bow visor falling off a ship, Arabs landing in skyscrapers and fusion on Earth. You are just a brainwashed twerp!At least we understand the difference between landing a plane in a skyscraper and crashing a plane into a skyscraper.
No you don't understand anything like the twerp you are.
Getting back on topic, which is "Ask Heiwa Anything".
Heiwa, would you please explain the theory behind the "gravity boost manoeuvre", sometimes called the "gravitational slingshot".
Much appreciated.
… It means that a spacecraft in its trajectory encounters (!) a fast moving planet in its orbit around our Sun and is magically kicked away from it to another fast moving planet in another orbit around Sun in a new trajectory with another initial direction and at nominally increased speed/change of direction using no fuel, thrust or rocket engine aboard. MAGIC! But there is no way to calculate any spacecraft trajectory before and after a gravity assisted kick and there is no way to ensure that your spacecraft can encounter the planet in its orbit at the right time at all for a kick. So any space trips including a gravity assisted kicks are 100% pseudoscientific, old false news nonsense …
I'll pass, thanks, because from what you write below you still haven't worked out how it works.Getting back on topic, which is "Ask Heiwa Anything".
Heiwa, would you please explain the theory behind the "gravity boost manoeuvre", sometimes called the "gravitational slingshot".
Much appreciated.
Thanks for asking. You find the answer at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#C1 ,
e.g.In other words, anything that you can't understand, you ridicule - just as I thought!Quote… It means that a spacecraft in its trajectory encounters (!) a fast moving planet in its orbit around our Sun and is magically kicked away from it to another fast moving planet in another orbit around Sun in a new trajectory with another initial direction and at nominally increased speed/change of direction using no fuel, thrust or rocket engine aboard. MAGIC! But there is no way to calculate any spacecraft trajectory before and after a gravity assisted kick and there is no way to ensure that your spacecraft can encounter the planet in its orbit at the right time at all for a kick. So any space trips including a gravity assisted kicks are 100% pseudoscientific, old false news nonsense …
I'll pass, thanks, because from what you write below you still haven't worked out how it works.Getting back on topic, which is "Ask Heiwa Anything".
Heiwa, would you please explain the theory behind the "gravity boost manoeuvre", sometimes called the "gravitational slingshot".
Much appreciated.
Thanks for asking. You find the answer at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#C1 ,Quote from: Heiwae.g.In other words, anything that you can't understand, you ridicule - just as I thought!Quote… It means that a spacecraft in its trajectory encounters (!) a fast moving planet in its orbit around our Sun and is magically kicked away from it to another fast moving planet in another orbit around Sun in a new trajectory with another initial direction and at nominally increased speed/change of direction using no fuel, thrust or rocket engine aboard. MAGIC! But there is no way to calculate any spacecraft trajectory before and after a gravity assisted kick and there is no way to ensure that your spacecraft can encounter the planet in its orbit at the right time at all for a kick. So any space trips including a gravity assisted kicks are 100% pseudoscientific, old false news nonsense …
Heiwa, you are still magical.
Still a jerk too, but magical.
I'd just like to ask you where they hid the Twin Towers.
Okay. Back to friendly conversations.If you can read with a blindfold on, any government will shoot you at once on sight. Suggest you read my website without blindfold. Have a nice time.
Heiwa, I have a question. I'm very interested in reading your website but I'm worried that just by reading it I might become wanted by the government like you are. So my question is, if I read your website with a blindfold on will I be safe from any legal action from the government?
If you can read with a blindfold on, any government will shoot you at once on sight.
If you can read with a blindfold on, any government will shoot you at once on sight. Suggest you read my website without blindfold. Have a nice time.From what I have read of your reputation, a tinfoil hat might be more effective.
No, you are just jealous that you cannot win any of my €1M Challenges - http://heiwaco.com/chall.htm .If you can read with a blindfold on, any government will shoot you at once on sight. Suggest you read my website without blindfold. Have a nice time.From what I have read of your reputation, a tinfoil hat might be more effective.
No, you are just jealous that you cannot win any of my €1M Challenges - .If you can read with a blindfold on, any government will shoot you at once on sight. Suggest you read my website without blindfold. Have a nice time.From what I have read of your reputation, a tinfoil hat might be more effective.
No, the reason why you cannot win any of my Challenges are (1) structures do not collapse from top by gravity, (2) human beings cannot fly in vacuum space, (3) you cannot produce steam by fusion, (4) there are no means to ignite a nuclear bomb and (5) you cannot knock off ship bow visors by going too fast in a storm.No, you are just jealous that you cannot win any of my €1M Challenges - .If you can read with a blindfold on, any government will shoot you at once on sight. Suggest you read my website without blindfold. Have a nice time.From what I have read of your reputation, a tinfoil hat might be more effective.
It is not possible to win one of your self-judged challenges due to some condition of yours. I think it's Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
That and the obvious conflict of interest.
No, the reason why you cannot win any of my Challenges are (1) structures do not collapse from top by gravity, (2) human beings cannot fly in vacuum space, (3) you cannot produce steam by fusion, (4) there are no means to ignite a nuclear bomb and (5) you cannot knock off ship bow visors by going too fast in a storm.No, you are just jealous that you cannot win any of my €1M Challenges - .If you can read with a blindfold on, any government will shoot you at once on sight. Suggest you read my website without blindfold. Have a nice time.From what I have read of your reputation, a tinfoil hat might be more effective.
It is not possible to win one of your self-judged challenges due to some condition of yours. I think it's Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
That and the obvious conflict of interest.
Only twerps think otherwise but cannot show they are right. Instead they get upset, arrogant and obnoxious and accuse me for all sorts of things.
Actually, it's more likely Dunning-Kruger.No, you are just jealous that you cannot win any of my €1M Challenges - .If you can read with a blindfold on, any government will shoot you at once on sight. Suggest you read my website without blindfold. Have a nice time.From what I have read of your reputation, a tinfoil hat might be more effective.
It is not possible to win one of your self-judged challenges due to some condition of yours. I think it's Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
It seems that according Dunning–Kruger a person of high ability like me tend to underestimate my relative competence and erroneously presume that tasks that are easy for me to perform are also easy for other people to perform. It is not my case. I just use critical thinking when looking at various matters and suggest other people to do the same. Just accepting what other people say is in my view stupid. Only twerps do it.Actually, it's more likely Dunning-Kruger.No, you are just jealous that you cannot win any of my €1M Challenges - .If you can read with a blindfold on, any government will shoot you at once on sight. Suggest you read my website without blindfold. Have a nice time.From what I have read of your reputation, a tinfoil hat might be more effective.
It is not possible to win one of your self-judged challenges due to some condition of yours. I think it's Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
Just accepting what other people say is in my view stupid. Only twerps do it.Do you think this is why no one listens to you? Because they're not stupid?
Plenty people listen to and agree with me and they are not stupid.Just accepting what other people say is in my view stupid. Only twerps do it.Do you think this is why no one listens to you? Because they're not stupid?
If they just accept what you say are they not stupid twerps?Plenty people listen to and agree with me and they are not stupid.Just accepting what other people say is in my view stupid. Only twerps do it.Do you think this is why no one listens to you? Because they're not stupid?
It seems that according Dunning–Kruger a person of high ability like me tend to underestimate my relative competence and erroneously presume that tasks that are easy for me to perform are also easy for other people to perform.It also says that stupid people like you don't realize just how stupid they really are.
I have corrected you multiple times already. You said you would change it if something was wrong on your website, but have yet to do so.I have read the Apollo focused ones.Thanks for asking. Please study:Wow, a lot in there, a good resource for space criticism.
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw2.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel2.htm
Only twerps believe in human space travel. Prove me wrong and collect €1M!
http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm
Are you a planarist?
They are utter bonkers.
Lies, misinformation and plain misunderstanding of the program and basic aspects of it, like lightning and photography.
I and others have pointed out many flaws. He has yet to change anything.
Why would I change anything? Do you really believe the fairy tales that human beings can travel in the vacuum of space by firing rockets at high speeds and finally land on Earth using a parachute? ROTFL! But it is a good Hollywood show!
It is like the fairy tales of US nuclear weapons. They are just invented by some science fiction writers 1942/5 with assistance of Hollywood.
But I agree that it is very easy to fool Americans using propaganda and media, e.g. that 19 Arabs destroyed the WTC of NY and the Pentagon of DC on 911 using air planes.
I must have missed your suggested corrections so please repeat them and I will see if they can improve my website.I have corrected you multiple times already. You said you would change it if something was wrong on your website, but have yet to do so.I have read the Apollo focused ones.Thanks for asking. Please study:Wow, a lot in there, a good resource for space criticism.
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw2.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel2.htm
Only twerps believe in human space travel. Prove me wrong and collect €1M!
http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm
Are you a planarist?
They are utter bonkers.
Lies, misinformation and plain misunderstanding of the program and basic aspects of it, like lightning and photography.
I and others have pointed out many flaws. He has yet to change anything.
Why would I change anything? Do you really believe the fairy tales that human beings can travel in the vacuum of space by firing rockets at high speeds and finally land on Earth using a parachute? ROTFL! But it is a good Hollywood show!
It is like the fairy tales of US nuclear weapons. They are just invented by some science fiction writers 1942/5 with assistance of Hollywood.
But I agree that it is very easy to fool Americans using propaganda and media, e.g. that 19 Arabs destroyed the WTC of NY and the Pentagon of DC on 911 using air planes.
I must have missed your suggested corrections so please repeat them and I will see if they can improve my website.For starters, you can change the part where you keep saying that nuclear fission can only happen with moderated slow neutrons because you have already acknowledged that unmoderated fast neutron fission reactors are real.
Well, even in an experimental 'fast' neutron fission reactor the process is moderated one way or other to prevent the whole thing to melt, i.e. using liquid sodium to cool it down and remote the heat (energy). And the 'fast' neutrons are just a little faster than the 'slow' neutrons. But liquid sodium is not easy to handle. So the whole thing about 'fast' neutrons is nonsense.I must have missed your suggested corrections so please repeat them and I will see if they can improve my website.For starters, you can change the part where you keep saying that nuclear fission can only happen with moderated slow neutrons because you have already acknowledged that unmoderated fast neutron fission reactors are real.
http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/fast-neutron-reactors.aspx
Yes, you do need to change your web site because cooling a reactor is not the same as moderating the neutrons. Sodium is used because it can act as a coolant without slowing the fast neutrons. You only think it's nonsense because you don't understand it and you won't change your site because you will never admit to being wrong about anything.Well, even in an experimental 'fast' neutron fission reactor the process is moderated one way or other to prevent the whole thing to melt, i.e. using liquid sodium to cool it down and remote the heat (energy). And the 'fast' neutrons are just a little faster than the 'slow' neutrons. But liquid sodium is not easy to handle. So the whole thing about 'fast' neutrons is nonsense.I must have missed your suggested corrections so please repeat them and I will see if they can improve my website.For starters, you can change the part where you keep saying that nuclear fission can only happen with moderated slow neutrons because you have already acknowledged that unmoderated fast neutron fission reactors are real.
http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/fast-neutron-reactors.aspx
So no need to change my website.
OK, show me how to improve my website. Show me what is wrong. And what you want to change. And how it should look.Yes, you do need to change your web site because cooling a reactor is not the same as moderating the neutrons. Sodium is used because it can act as a coolant without slowing the fast neutrons. You only think it's nonsense because you don't understand it and you won't change your site because you will never admit to being wrong about anything.Well, even in an experimental 'fast' neutron fission reactor the process is moderated one way or other to prevent the whole thing to melt, i.e. using liquid sodium to cool it down and remote the heat (energy). And the 'fast' neutrons are just a little faster than the 'slow' neutrons. But liquid sodium is not easy to handle. So the whole thing about 'fast' neutrons is nonsense.I must have missed your suggested corrections so please repeat them and I will see if they can improve my website.For starters, you can change the part where you keep saying that nuclear fission can only happen with moderated slow neutrons because you have already acknowledged that unmoderated fast neutron fission reactors are real.
http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/fast-neutron-reactors.aspx
So no need to change my website.
I just told you that your site is wrong about fast fission, so that's one thing. Another thing would be to break the pages into a number of smaller, easier to digest pages that address specific points, rather one humongous page that rambles on and on and just dismisses everything as propaganda. Perhaps you should consult a professional web site designer for specific layout suggestions.OK, show me how to improve my website. Show me what is wrong. And what you want to change. And how it should look.Yes, you do need to change your web site because cooling a reactor is not the same as moderating the neutrons. Sodium is used because it can act as a coolant without slowing the fast neutrons. You only think it's nonsense because you don't understand it and you won't change your site because you will never admit to being wrong about anything.Well, even in an experimental 'fast' neutron fission reactor the process is moderated one way or other to prevent the whole thing to melt, i.e. using liquid sodium to cool it down and remote the heat (energy). And the 'fast' neutrons are just a little faster than the 'slow' neutrons. But liquid sodium is not easy to handle. So the whole thing about 'fast' neutrons is nonsense.I must have missed your suggested corrections so please repeat them and I will see if they can improve my website.For starters, you can change the part where you keep saying that nuclear fission can only happen with moderated slow neutrons because you have already acknowledged that unmoderated fast neutron fission reactors are real.
http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/fast-neutron-reactors.aspx
So no need to change my website.
It seems you haven't visited my popular website about nuclear bombs.I just told you that your site is wrong about fast fission, so that's one thing. Another thing would be to break the pages into a number of smaller, easier to digest pages that address specific points, rather one humongous page that rambles on and on and just dismisses everything as propaganda. Perhaps you should consult a professional web site designer for specific layout suggestions.OK, show me how to improve my website. Show me what is wrong. And what you want to change. And how it should look.Yes, you do need to change your web site because cooling a reactor is not the same as moderating the neutrons. Sodium is used because it can act as a coolant without slowing the fast neutrons. You only think it's nonsense because you don't understand it and you won't change your site because you will never admit to being wrong about anything.Well, even in an experimental 'fast' neutron fission reactor the process is moderated one way or other to prevent the whole thing to melt, i.e. using liquid sodium to cool it down and remote the heat (energy). And the 'fast' neutrons are just a little faster than the 'slow' neutrons. But liquid sodium is not easy to handle. So the whole thing about 'fast' neutrons is nonsense.I must have missed your suggested corrections so please repeat them and I will see if they can improve my website.For starters, you can change the part where you keep saying that nuclear fission can only happen with moderated slow neutrons because you have already acknowledged that unmoderated fast neutron fission reactors are real.
http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/fast-neutron-reactors.aspx
So no need to change my website.
Heiwa, what does it feel like to watch a video that destroys everything you pretend to believe in?No, the NASA video just shows something - a rocket? - dropping from sky by gravity that manages to stop by itself ... and land ... vertically ... at zero speed ... on land ... on Earth.
https://i.imgur.com/2RCnYHi.gifv
Does it burn?
And only a piss poor engineers think that it's impossible to land a first stage booster after it's already been done 20 times.Heiwa, what does it feel like to watch a video that destroys everything you pretend to believe in?No, the NASA video just shows something - a rocket? - dropping from sky by gravity that manages to stop by itself ... and land ... vertically ... at zero speed ... on land ... on Earth.
https://i.imgur.com/2RCnYHi.gifv
Does it burn?
It is just a late, stupid part of the NASA space show that I describe at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm . Only twerps believe that science fiction is possible in reality.
It isn't.
I want to ask this one:
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?
What about my question, sir?
Well, it - the footage of it - was fakery every time. Just drop anything from say 1 000 or 10 000 m altitude and calculate the energy required to stop the drop so that anything lands at zero speed at 0 m altitude. Then explain how to get that energy into anything.And only a piss poor engineers think that it's impossible to land a first stage booster after it's already been done 20 times.Heiwa, what does it feel like to watch a video that destroys everything you pretend to believe in?No, the NASA video just shows something - a rocket? - dropping from sky by gravity that manages to stop by itself ... and land ... vertically ... at zero speed ... on land ... on Earth.
https://i.imgur.com/2RCnYHi.gifv
Does it burn?
It is just a late, stupid part of the NASA space show that I describe at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm . Only twerps believe that science fiction is possible in reality.
It isn't.
No. People accepting what I say are intelligent and nice.If they just accept what you say are they not stupid twerps?Plenty people listen to and agree with me and they are not stupid.Just accepting what other people say is in my view stupid. Only twerps do it.Do you think this is why no one listens to you? Because they're not stupid?
No. People accepting what I say are intelligent and nice.If they just accept what you say are they not stupid twerps?Plenty people listen to and agree with me and they are not stupid.Just accepting what other people say is in my view stupid. Only twerps do it.Do you think this is why no one listens to you? Because they're not stupid?
Just accepting what other people say is in my view stupid. Only twerps do it.
I want to ask this one:
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?What about my question, sir?
Hi Heiwa, it appears you are very popular and your wisdom is in high demand. I think this is a very good question and we would all like you to tell us your thoughts. Here is some more Nespresso pods to drink from as we converse
(https://img-new.cgtrader.com/items/126298/nespresso_capsule_3d_model_max_5ceb80b3-d0bb-4635-aba3-5937d2b05f73.jpg)
I want to ask this one:
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?What about my question, sir?
Hi Heiwa, it appears you are very popular and your wisdom is in high demand. I think this is a very good question and we would all like you to tell us your thoughts. Here is some more Nespresso pods to drink from as we converse
(https://img-new.cgtrader.com/items/126298/nespresso_capsule_3d_model_max_5ceb80b3-d0bb-4635-aba3-5937d2b05f73.jpg)
Maybe you missed this again Heiwa. We impore you to share your wisdom and give us your knowledge
Here is a bigger pod to get your attention
(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/414FXuMEIeL._SL500_AA300_.jpg)
Like I said, only a piss poor engineer would think that. Thanks for proving my point. A good engineer would wonder how thay did it for real instead of wondering how they faked it.Well, it - the footage of it - was fakery every time. Just drop anything from say 1 000 or 10 000 m altitude and calculate the energy required to stop the drop so that anything lands at zero speed at 0 m altitude. Then explain how to get that energy into anything.And only a piss poor engineers think that it's impossible to land a first stage booster after it's already been done 20 times.Heiwa, what does it feel like to watch a video that destroys everything you pretend to believe in?No, the NASA video just shows something - a rocket? - dropping from sky by gravity that manages to stop by itself ... and land ... vertically ... at zero speed ... on land ... on Earth.
https://i.imgur.com/2RCnYHi.gifv
Does it burn?
It is just a late, stupid part of the NASA space show that I describe at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm . Only twerps believe that science fiction is possible in reality.
It isn't.
I want to ask this one:
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?What about my question, sir?
Hi Heiwa, it appears you are very popular and your wisdom is in high demand. I think this is a very good question and we would all like you to tell us your thoughts. Here is some more Nespresso pods to drink from as we converse
(https://img-new.cgtrader.com/items/126298/nespresso_capsule_3d_model_max_5ceb80b3-d0bb-4635-aba3-5937d2b05f73.jpg)
Maybe you missed this again Heiwa. We impore you to share your wisdom and give us your knowledge
Here is a bigger pod to get your attention
(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/414FXuMEIeL._SL500_AA300_.jpg)
Thanks. I was out Christmas shopping and had a bad Japanese lunch during it, but otherwise I am top 100% fit.
What is your question?
I want to ask this one:
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?
You keep showing how much you don't understand about nuclear reactions. Moderation is the process of reducing neutron energies so the fuel will capture them and fission. The fuel in fast fission reactors don't need to have the neutron energies reduced and therefore are NOT moderated. You clearly don't understand what moderation is or how control rods control the reaction rates...thus the reason they're called "control" rods. These concepts are lost on you which is just another reason in a long line of reasons showing you have no idea what you're talking about.Well, even in an experimental 'fast' neutron fission reactor the process is moderated one way or other to prevent the whole thing to melt, i.e. using liquid sodium to cool it down and remote the heat (energy). And the 'fast' neutrons are just a little faster than the 'slow' neutrons. But liquid sodium is not easy to handle. So the whole thing about 'fast' neutrons is nonsense.I must have missed your suggested corrections so please repeat them and I will see if they can improve my website.For starters, you can change the part where you keep saying that nuclear fission can only happen with moderated slow neutrons because you have already acknowledged that unmoderated fast neutron fission reactors are real.
http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/fast-neutron-reactors.aspx
So no need to change my website.
In a nuclear weapon of mass destruction there is no moderation of any kind, we are told, and the neutrons just fly away at the speed of light and 'fission' a lump of solid uranium. Only twerps like you - markjo - believes it.
But I know all about fission and peaceful nuclear power plants ashore and on ships using fission.You keep showing how much you don't understand about nuclear reactions. Moderation is the process of reducing neutron energies so the fuel will capture them and fission. The fuel in fast fission reactors don't need to have the neutron energies reduced and therefore are NOT moderated. You clearly don't understand what moderation is or how control rods control the reaction rates...thus the reason they're called "control" rods. These concepts are lost on you which is just another reason in a long line of reasons showing you have no idea what you're talking about.Well, even in an experimental 'fast' neutron fission reactor the process is moderated one way or other to prevent the whole thing to melt, i.e. using liquid sodium to cool it down and remote the heat (energy). And the 'fast' neutrons are just a little faster than the 'slow' neutrons. But liquid sodium is not easy to handle. So the whole thing about 'fast' neutrons is nonsense.I must have missed your suggested corrections so please repeat them and I will see if they can improve my website.For starters, you can change the part where you keep saying that nuclear fission can only happen with moderated slow neutrons because you have already acknowledged that unmoderated fast neutron fission reactors are real.
http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/fast-neutron-reactors.aspx
So no need to change my website.
In a nuclear weapon of mass destruction there is no moderation of any kind, we are told, and the neutrons just fly away at the speed of light and 'fission' a lump of solid uranium. Only twerps like you - markjo - believes it.
You really should learn how nuclear reactions work before you make unfounded claims as to what is real and what isn't.
Mike
You don't know squat about fission or else you wouldn't make such stupid statements about moderation. Go back and learn how nuclear reactions work.But I know all about fission and peaceful nuclear power plants ashore and on ships using fission.You keep showing how much you don't understand about nuclear reactions. Moderation is the process of reducing neutron energies so the fuel will capture them and fission. The fuel in fast fission reactors don't need to have the neutron energies reduced and therefore are NOT moderated. You clearly don't understand what moderation is or how control rods control the reaction rates...thus the reason they're called "control" rods. These concepts are lost on you which is just another reason in a long line of reasons showing you have no idea what you're talking about.Well, even in an experimental 'fast' neutron fission reactor the process is moderated one way or other to prevent the whole thing to melt, i.e. using liquid sodium to cool it down and remote the heat (energy). And the 'fast' neutrons are just a little faster than the 'slow' neutrons. But liquid sodium is not easy to handle. So the whole thing about 'fast' neutrons is nonsense.I must have missed your suggested corrections so please repeat them and I will see if they can improve my website.For starters, you can change the part where you keep saying that nuclear fission can only happen with moderated slow neutrons because you have already acknowledged that unmoderated fast neutron fission reactors are real.
http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/fast-neutron-reactors.aspx
So no need to change my website.
In a nuclear weapon of mass destruction there is no moderation of any kind, we are told, and the neutrons just fly away at the speed of light and 'fission' a lump of solid uranium. Only twerps like you - markjo - believes it.
You really should learn how nuclear reactions work before you make unfounded claims as to what is real and what isn't.
Mike
I only consider the military, secret, explosive nuclear weapons fission killing people in a FLASH 100% pseudoscience to scare people. I explain why at http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm and I pay you €1M to show that I am wrong at http://heiwaco.com/chall4.htm .
I want to ask this one:
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?What about my question, sir?
Hi Heiwa, it appears you are very popular and your wisdom is in high demand. I think this is a very good question and we would all like you to tell us your thoughts. Here is some more Nespresso pods to drink from as we converse
(https://img-new.cgtrader.com/items/126298/nespresso_capsule_3d_model_max_5ceb80b3-d0bb-4635-aba3-5937d2b05f73.jpg)
Maybe you missed this again Heiwa. We impore you to share your wisdom and give us your knowledge
Here is a bigger pod to get your attention
(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/414FXuMEIeL._SL500_AA300_.jpg)
Thanks. I was out Christmas shopping and had a bad Japanese lunch during it, but otherwise I am top 100% fit.
What is your question?
Here, let me help you out old fella:I want to ask this one:
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?
HEIWA, WHY DO YOU KEEP IGNORING THIS QUESTION? OUR COFFEE IS GETTING COLD
I want to ask this one:
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?
Hang on Heiwa, so to try and prove or disprove an explanation, you risked the lives of you and your crew by driving it in a reckless manner attempting to recreate one of the worst maritime disasters in history? What did your crew say after they woke up from your suicidal mission when you told them you wanted to see if the bow visor could break and thus sink the ship in a B12 storm?No one was a risk. I knew what happens when the forebody of a ship slams into a wave! It lasts less than a second and is, full scale, very noisy. I had participated doing model tests at Webb Institute of Naval Architecture, Glen Cove, LI, NY, USA, checking it 1968 and at Lloyd's Register, London, 1971, I was checking structurally damaged foreships due to severe weather. The latter in order to improve standards and rules. So already October 1994 I knew that the Swedish prime minister was lying about the M/S Estonia sinking. Of course I told the Swedish chief accident investigator BS this at the end of the month. Shipping is a small world. Everyone knows everyone and I knew BS since many years. He was not happy ... and he died suddenly February 1997 never finishing his investigation.
So did you tell them your intension to smash the ship into waves prior to hitting them and they were all cool with it or only afterwards.No, the test was noted in the logbook, etc. I knew the Egyptian captain & crew since many years.
I only ask because if it were me, I would feel like I have a right to know whether someone was going to gamble on my life or safety to satisfy their own personal interest. Maybe others would have felt the same way. I'm sure you have a very trustworthy face, but a gamble is a gamble.
I am not an annoyingly stupid or foolish person or an unlikable personPlease, no false modesty. You are all of those things, and more.
Please, quote me correctly (and not bits).I am not an annoyingly stupid or foolish person or an unlikable personPlease, no false modesty. You are all of those things, and more.
So did you tell them your intension to smash the ship into waves prior to hitting them and they were all cool with it or only afterwards.No, the test was noted in the logbook, etc. I knew the Egyptian captain & crew since many years.
I only ask because if it were me, I would feel like I have a right to know whether someone was going to gamble on my life or safety to satisfy their own personal interest. Maybe others would have felt the same way. I'm sure you have a very trustworthy face, but a gamble is a gamble.
You sound like a government shill fucking around on the Internet. Pls, introduce yourself, if you are real.
NoSo did you tell them your intension to smash the ship into waves prior to hitting them and they were all cool with it or only afterwards.No, the test was noted in the logbook, etc. I knew the Egyptian captain & crew since many years.
I only ask because if it were me, I would feel like I have a right to know whether someone was going to gamble on my life or safety to satisfy their own personal interest. Maybe others would have felt the same way. I'm sure you have a very trustworthy face, but a gamble is a gamble.
You sound like a government shill fucking around on the Internet. Pls, introduce yourself, if you are real.
You could be right Heiwa, I could be any number of things. However I am not on the internet in this thread. I am at your office enjoying one of your fine Nespressos. Remember? 8)
Hmmm, dementia is a cruel disease, I'm sorry to see you have been afflicted with it. Do you have any carers or family I can contact for you?You sound like a twerp acting like a medical doctor of sort on the Internet. ROTFL
You do the same thing so you have no place calling someone else out for it.Hmmm, dementia is a cruel disease, I'm sorry to see you have been afflicted with it. Do you have any carers or family I can contact for you?You sound like a twerp acting like a medical doctor of sort on the Internet. ROTFL
Are you paid for it or are you just plain stupid? Please reply!
You do the same thing so you have no place calling someone else out for it.Hmmm, dementia is a cruel disease, I'm sorry to see you have been afflicted with it. Do you have any carers or family I can contact for you?You sound like a twerp acting like a medical doctor of sort on the Internet. ROTFL
Are you paid for it or are you just plain stupid? Please reply!
Mike
Hmmm, dementia is a cruel disease, I'm sorry to see you have been afflicted with it. Do you have any carers or family I can contact for you?You sound like a twerp acting like a medical doctor of sort on the Internet. ROTFL
Are you paid for it or are you just plain stupid? Please reply!
Thanks. I will give it to my mother who at 98 is in good health and supports me 100%. We had a good laugh together already 1996 when a Swedish government spokesperson called me "an unscientific, unintelligent and unreasonable querulant that spreads rumours and untruths (lies) as the worst creator of conspiracy theories", when I suggested that ships do not float on bow visors or windows in a deck house.Hmmm, dementia is a cruel disease, I'm sorry to see you have been afflicted with it. Do you have any carers or family I can contact for you?You sound like a twerp acting like a medical doctor of sort on the Internet. ROTFL
Are you paid for it or are you just plain stupid? Please reply!
I am paid for it actually..... You see, whenever I log onto this site, I do so in my work time. Not my free time. So in a way, I am getting paid while being here.
Laugh all you want Heiwa. You are fast ending your twilight years so probably among the last opportunities you will have. The demise of someone suffering from dementia is always heart breaking to witness.
Here is a gift from me
(https://www.consumerreports.org/content/dam/cro/news_articles/appliances/Nespresso_pods.jpg)
You can use it to share around and help make new friends when you check yourself in a nursing home.
Your contributions to society and this forum will not be forgotten Heiwa. You will be a legend. Go now and leave while you still have a shred of dignity and semblance of yourself. We wish you well
So your government thinks you're an idiot, everyone else thinks you're a liar and/or crazy and your elderly mom still has to support you.Thanks. I will give it to my mother who at 98 is in good health and supports me 100%. We had a good laugh together already 1996 when a Swedish government spokesperson called me "an unscientific, unintelligent and unreasonable querulant that spreads rumours and untruths (lies) as the worst creator of conspiracy theories", when I suggested that ships do not float on bow visors or windows in a deck house.Hmmm, dementia is a cruel disease, I'm sorry to see you have been afflicted with it. Do you have any carers or family I can contact for you?You sound like a twerp acting like a medical doctor of sort on the Internet. ROTFL
Are you paid for it or are you just plain stupid? Please reply!
I am paid for it actually..... You see, whenever I log onto this site, I do so in my work time. Not my free time. So in a way, I am getting paid while being here.
Laugh all you want Heiwa. You are fast ending your twilight years so probably among the last opportunities you will have. The demise of someone suffering from dementia is always heart breaking to witness.
Here is a gift from me
(https://www.consumerreports.org/content/dam/cro/news_articles/appliances/Nespresso_pods.jpg)
You can use it to share around and help make new friends when you check yourself in a nursing home.
Your contributions to society and this forum will not be forgotten Heiwa. You will be a legend. Go now and leave while you still have a shred of dignity and semblance of yourself. We wish you well
ships do not float
No, my mother runs her own affairs. I left her/home 1965 to study at Gothenburg. But we are since then always on good terms. She always visited me regularily whereever I was; Gothenburg, London, Yokohama, Malmö, Rotterdam, Monte Carlo, Beausoleil. When she was 95 she slipped at my tennis club, Monte Carlo Country Club, and decided to stop travelling abroad.So your government thinks you're an idiot, everyone else thinks you're a liar and/or crazy and your elderly mom still has to support you.Thanks. I will give it to my mother who at 98 is in good health and supports me 100%. We had a good laugh together already 1996 when a Swedish government spokesperson called me "an unscientific, unintelligent and unreasonable querulant that spreads rumours and untruths (lies) as the worst creator of conspiracy theories", when I suggested that ships do not float on bow visors or windows in a deck house.Hmmm, dementia is a cruel disease, I'm sorry to see you have been afflicted with it. Do you have any carers or family I can contact for you?You sound like a twerp acting like a medical doctor of sort on the Internet. ROTFL
Are you paid for it or are you just plain stupid? Please reply!
I am paid for it actually..... You see, whenever I log onto this site, I do so in my work time. Not my free time. So in a way, I am getting paid while being here.
Laugh all you want Heiwa. You are fast ending your twilight years so probably among the last opportunities you will have. The demise of someone suffering from dementia is always heart breaking to witness.
Here is a gift from me
(https://www.consumerreports.org/content/dam/cro/news_articles/appliances/Nespresso_pods.jpg)
You can use it to share around and help make new friends when you check yourself in a nursing home.
Your contributions to society and this forum will not be forgotten Heiwa. You will be a legend. Go now and leave while you still have a shred of dignity and semblance of yourself. We wish you well
But hey, you had a laugh twenty years ago, so you got that going for you.
I didn't suggest it, you said it. Not my problem if you don't like what you say. But it must be hard keeping all those lies straight.No, my mother runs her own affairs. I left her/home 1965 to study at Gothenburg. But we are since then always on good terms. She always visited me regularily whereever I was; Gothenburg, London, Yokohama, Malmö, Rotterdam, Monte Carlo, Beausoleil. When she was 95 she slipped at my tennis club, Monte Carlo Country Club, and decided to stop travelling abroad.So your government thinks you're an idiot, everyone else thinks you're a liar and/or crazy and your elderly mom still has to support you.Thanks. I will give it to my mother who at 98 is in good health and supports me 100%. We had a good laugh together already 1996 when a Swedish government spokesperson called me "an unscientific, unintelligent and unreasonable querulant that spreads rumours and untruths (lies) as the worst creator of conspiracy theories", when I suggested that ships do not float on bow visors or windows in a deck house.Hmmm, dementia is a cruel disease, I'm sorry to see you have been afflicted with it. Do you have any carers or family I can contact for you?You sound like a twerp acting like a medical doctor of sort on the Internet. ROTFL
Are you paid for it or are you just plain stupid? Please reply!
I am paid for it actually..... You see, whenever I log onto this site, I do so in my work time. Not my free time. So in a way, I am getting paid while being here.
Laugh all you want Heiwa. You are fast ending your twilight years so probably among the last opportunities you will have. The demise of someone suffering from dementia is always heart breaking to witness.
Here is a gift from me
(https://www.consumerreports.org/content/dam/cro/news_articles/appliances/Nespresso_pods.jpg)
You can use it to share around and help make new friends when you check yourself in a nursing home.
Your contributions to society and this forum will not be forgotten Heiwa. You will be a legend. Go now and leave while you still have a shred of dignity and semblance of yourself. We wish you well
But hey, you had a laugh twenty years ago, so you got that going for you.
Why do you suggest she has to support me? You are of course another twerp here. What makes you be such shit?
What lies are you referring to?I didn't suggest it, you said it. Not my problem if you don't like what you say. But it must be hard keeping all those lies straight.No, my mother runs her own affairs. I left her/home 1965 to study at Gothenburg. But we are since then always on good terms. She always visited me regularily whereever I was; Gothenburg, London, Yokohama, Malmö, Rotterdam, Monte Carlo, Beausoleil. When she was 95 she slipped at my tennis club, Monte Carlo Country Club, and decided to stop travelling abroad.So your government thinks you're an idiot, everyone else thinks you're a liar and/or crazy and your elderly mom still has to support you.Thanks. I will give it to my mother who at 98 is in good health and supports me 100%. We had a good laugh together already 1996 when a Swedish government spokesperson called me "an unscientific, unintelligent and unreasonable querulant that spreads rumours and untruths (lies) as the worst creator of conspiracy theories", when I suggested that ships do not float on bow visors or windows in a deck house.Hmmm, dementia is a cruel disease, I'm sorry to see you have been afflicted with it. Do you have any carers or family I can contact for you?You sound like a twerp acting like a medical doctor of sort on the Internet. ROTFL
Are you paid for it or are you just plain stupid? Please reply!
I am paid for it actually..... You see, whenever I log onto this site, I do so in my work time. Not my free time. So in a way, I am getting paid while being here.
Laugh all you want Heiwa. You are fast ending your twilight years so probably among the last opportunities you will have. The demise of someone suffering from dementia is always heart breaking to witness.
Here is a gift from me
(https://www.consumerreports.org/content/dam/cro/news_articles/appliances/Nespresso_pods.jpg)
You can use it to share around and help make new friends when you check yourself in a nursing home.
Your contributions to society and this forum will not be forgotten Heiwa. You will be a legend. Go now and leave while you still have a shred of dignity and semblance of yourself. We wish you well
But hey, you had a laugh twenty years ago, so you got that going for you.
Why do you suggest she has to support me? You are of course another twerp here. What makes you be such shit?
Pretty much everything you say. Let's start with you having a death sentence in the US. That's a lie. You post classified material on your website. That's a lie. No one died in the towers on 911. That is a particularly heinous lie. Everyone who says they saw planes hit the towers is lying. Another vicious lie.What lies are you referring to?I didn't suggest it, you said it. Not my problem if you don't like what you say. But it must be hard keeping all those lies straight.No, my mother runs her own affairs. I left her/home 1965 to study at Gothenburg. But we are since then always on good terms. She always visited me regularily whereever I was; Gothenburg, London, Yokohama, Malmö, Rotterdam, Monte Carlo, Beausoleil. When she was 95 she slipped at my tennis club, Monte Carlo Country Club, and decided to stop travelling abroad.So your government thinks you're an idiot, everyone else thinks you're a liar and/or crazy and your elderly mom still has to support you.Thanks. I will give it to my mother who at 98 is in good health and supports me 100%. We had a good laugh together already 1996 when a Swedish government spokesperson called me "an unscientific, unintelligent and unreasonable querulant that spreads rumours and untruths (lies) as the worst creator of conspiracy theories", when I suggested that ships do not float on bow visors or windows in a deck house.Hmmm, dementia is a cruel disease, I'm sorry to see you have been afflicted with it. Do you have any carers or family I can contact for you?You sound like a twerp acting like a medical doctor of sort on the Internet. ROTFL
Are you paid for it or are you just plain stupid? Please reply!
I am paid for it actually..... You see, whenever I log onto this site, I do so in my work time. Not my free time. So in a way, I am getting paid while being here.
Laugh all you want Heiwa. You are fast ending your twilight years so probably among the last opportunities you will have. The demise of someone suffering from dementia is always heart breaking to witness.
Here is a gift from me
(https://www.consumerreports.org/content/dam/cro/news_articles/appliances/Nespresso_pods.jpg)
You can use it to share around and help make new friends when you check yourself in a nursing home.
Your contributions to society and this forum will not be forgotten Heiwa. You will be a legend. Go now and leave while you still have a shred of dignity and semblance of yourself. We wish you well
But hey, you had a laugh twenty years ago, so you got that going for you.
Why do you suggest she has to support me? You are of course another twerp here. What makes you be such shit?
What lies are you referring to?Too many to list. You've been caught lying over and over again. You need to realize that everything you post on the web is there for ever.
Well I post my findings at http://heiwaco.com since many years and pay anybody €1M showing I am wrong. You haven't collected.What lies are you referring to?Too many to list. You've been caught lying over and over again. You need to realize that everything you post on the web is there for ever.
Mike
That has absolutely nothing do with your lies. Nice try.Well I post my findings at http://heiwaco.com since many years and pay anybody €1M showing I am wrong. You haven't collected.What lies are you referring to?Too many to list. You've been caught lying over and over again. You need to realize that everything you post on the web is there for ever.
Mike
Well it does introduce another lie. He's said elsewhere that his challenges are unwinnable (everyone knows that is because the sole judge is biased) which means he won't ever pay anyone.That has absolutely nothing do with your lies. Nice try.Well I post my findings at http://heiwaco.com since many years and pay anybody €1M showing I am wrong. You haven't collected.What lies are you referring to?Too many to list. You've been caught lying over and over again. You need to realize that everything you post on the web is there for ever.
Mike
Mike
That has absolutely nothing do with your lies. Nice try.Well I post my findings at http://heiwaco.com since many years and pay anybody €1M showing I am wrong. You haven't collected.What lies are you referring to?Too many to list. You've been caught lying over and over again. You need to realize that everything you post on the web is there for ever.
Mike
Mike
Because you are sickThat has absolutely nothing do with your lies. Nice try.Well I post my findings at http://heiwaco.com since many years and pay anybody €1M showing I am wrong. You haven't collected.What lies are you referring to?Too many to list. You've been caught lying over and over again. You need to realize that everything you post on the web is there for ever.
Mike
Mike
As I say - I post my findings at http://heiwaco.com . If anything is incorrect the visitors are invited to inform me so the matter can be corrected. Only internet twerps do not understand it, and go on about me lying, bla, bla. Why would I lie?
Why would I lie?Because you're a senile old codger that thinks his lies make himself look more important.
Because you constantly lie and contradict yourself. We've been over this before.That has absolutely nothing do with your lies. Nice try.Well I post my findings at http://heiwaco.com since many years and pay anybody €1M showing I am wrong. You haven't collected.What lies are you referring to?Too many to list. You've been caught lying over and over again. You need to realize that everything you post on the web is there for ever.
Mike
Mike
As I say - I post my findings at http://heiwaco.com . If anything is incorrect the visitors are invited to inform me so the matter can be corrected. Only internet twerps do not understand it, and go on about me lying, bla, bla. Why would I lie?
I am neither sick nor senile. Why do you suggest such nonsense?Because everything you say, and your website indicate that.
Well, you sound like a sick twerp.I am neither sick nor senile. Why do you suggest such nonsense?Because everything you say, and your website indicate that.
We are asking heiwa anything but can't geting a reply. he is a crook, saying lie.
Can't we all just enjoy our virtual espressos and have a civil conversation?I just answer as best as I can using a language fit for the circumstances.
C'mon Heiwa, we are all guests at your office enjoying your fine Nespresso coffee. Let's try to remain calm and civil and not call each other twerps.
Anyway, Heiwa, what is your favourite nespresso pod flavour and why?
Yes, why? Any ideas? You sound like a typical twerp.C'mon Heiwa, we are all guests at your office enjoying your fine Nespresso coffee. Let's try to remain calm and civil and not call each other twerps.
Anyway, Heiwa, what is your favourite nespresso pod flavour and why?
I'm curious what your style is. No need to be so cranky.Sorry, I do not understand your question.
As I say - I post my findings at http://heiwaco.com (http://heiwaco.com) . If anything is incorrect the visitors are invited to inform me so the matter can be corrected.
No, my exciting Challenges are that people confirm what various authorities suggest and then I PAY € 1M.
As I say - I post my findings at http://heiwaco.com (http://heiwaco.com) . If anything is incorrect the visitors are invited to inform me so the matter can be corrected.
I thought your whole stupid little game was that you PAY people for proving you are wrong.
No, my exciting Challenges are that people confirm what various authorities suggest and then I PAY € 1M.
As I say - I post my findings at http://heiwaco.com (http://heiwaco.com) . If anything is incorrect the visitors are invited to inform me so the matter can be corrected.
I thought your whole stupid little game was that you PAY people for proving you are wrong.
I want to ask this one:
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?
Given nobody here is uber rich like Heiwa to afford to fly over and meet him for a coffee and a chat, I figure, why not do a virtual one?Yes, space travel is fascinating. But as you cannot stop anywhere in space and return, it is pretty futile. I (and you) have to remain on Earth with all those ugly, obnoxious twerps that believe otherwise. AI will not help them and I do not need AI for obvious reasons.
The rule is that you would conduct yourself with him like you would in real life. And before you post, you must post a picture (keep it small by using img width=100) of the pod flavour you would like to drink and have him 'prepare' for you. This hopefully means that discussions will be civil and no one gets called a twerp. There is also to be no referencing to his website because if you were actually sitting in his office, enjoying a Nespresso, he would need to use his own words.
So I'll start
(http://www.sandrascloset.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Capsule_nespresso_linizio_lungo.jpg)
Heiwa, I would like to talk about space travel. It is a fascinating subject and I was wondering, lets talk about faked moon landings (or fake return trips from the moon). This doesn't mean that space flight in of itself is impossible. Just that we haven't discovered a viable means of getting people on return trips. Landing on the moon may be easier than the Earth as it has less gravity and no atmosphere to burn you up. We can see though with the Mars One project there were countless numbers of people that would relish the opportunity to knowingly take a one way trip to Mars even when the odds of getting there are slim, and the odds of surviving more than a few minutes in its surface would be even slimmer. Perhaps the people who 'came' back from the moon were not the same people who landed on the moon but body doubles! The real landers are probably still on the moon.
But do you think humanity is bound to Earth forever? Should we invest all our resources into this planet for as long as we can, never even dreaming of a future where we colonise space? Or do you see an opportunity that perhaps someday, we can become advanced enough to leave this planet. Even if the only way was literally in Artificial Intelligence form and uploading our 'consciousness' into the cosmos. Maybe our human bodies are simply too frail.
I would like your insight on this mind boggling subject
<takes a sip>
Ahh. That's some fine Nespresso 8)
Ask to heiwa and he will not reply your question. Ahahaha heiwa is a loser. He can't answer us but only easy question, childish questions. He can't answer "live" questions but "dead" and useless questions Because;
He'iwa is a necrophile.
Ask to heiwa and he will not reply your question. Ahahaha heiwa is a loser. He can't answer us but only easy question, childish questions. He can't answer "live" questions but "dead" and useless questions Because;
He'iwa is a necrophile.
No, not even a nercromancer. I prefer live, female company. Any more questions?
Ask to heiwa and he will not reply your question. Ahahaha heiwa is a loser. He can't answer us but only easy question, childish questions. He can't answer "live" questions but "dead" and useless questions Because;
He'iwa is a necrophile.
No, not even a nercromancer. I prefer live, female company. Any more questions?
You haven't even answered his first question. Why are you asking if he has anymore?
I guess even the simplest things get difficult at your age! :(
The question is already here. Nobody needs to repeat it. So, either you're unable to comprehend what you read and can't find his question or you're just evading the question because you really can't answer it. I believe you can't answer it.Ask to heiwa and he will not reply your question. Ahahaha heiwa is a loser. He can't answer us but only easy question, childish questions. He can't answer "live" questions but "dead" and useless questions Because;
He'iwa is a necrophile.
No, not even a nercromancer. I prefer live, female company. Any more questions?
You haven't even answered his first question. Why are you asking if he has anymore?
I guess even the simplest things get difficult at your age! :(
Please, repeat question. Show some respect for age!
The question is already here. Nobody needs to repeat it. So, either you're unable to comprehend what you read and can't find his question or you're just evading the question because you really can't answer it. I believe you can't answer it.Ask to heiwa and he will not reply your question. Ahahaha heiwa is a loser. He can't answer us but only easy question, childish questions. He can't answer "live" questions but "dead" and useless questions Because;
He'iwa is a necrophile.
No, not even a nercromancer. I prefer live, female company. Any more questions?
You haven't even answered his first question. Why are you asking if he has anymore?
I guess even the simplest things get difficult at your age! :(
Please, repeat question. Show some respect for age!
Mike
Keep playing that game and pretending you can't figure out what the question is. It's okay. We all know it's because you don't have an answer.The question is already here. Nobody needs to repeat it. So, either you're unable to comprehend what you read and can't find his question or you're just evading the question because you really can't answer it. I believe you can't answer it.Ask to heiwa and he will not reply your question. Ahahaha heiwa is a loser. He can't answer us but only easy question, childish questions. He can't answer "live" questions but "dead" and useless questions Because;
He'iwa is a necrophile.
No, not even a nercromancer. I prefer live, female company. Any more questions?
You haven't even answered his first question. Why are you asking if he has anymore?
I guess even the simplest things get difficult at your age! :(
Please, repeat question. Show some respect for age!
Mike
What question I cannot answer?
Actually I have no idea what you are on about. You sound like a twerp.Keep playing that game and pretending you can't figure out what the question is. It's okay. We all know it's because you don't have an answer.The question is already here. Nobody needs to repeat it. So, either you're unable to comprehend what you read and can't find his question or you're just evading the question because you really can't answer it. I believe you can't answer it.Ask to heiwa and he will not reply your question. Ahahaha heiwa is a loser. He can't answer us but only easy question, childish questions. He can't answer "live" questions but "dead" and useless questions Because;
He'iwa is a necrophile.
No, not even a nercromancer. I prefer live, female company. Any more questions?
You haven't even answered his first question. Why are you asking if he has anymore?
I guess even the simplest things get difficult at your age! :(
Please, repeat question. Show some respect for age!
Mike
What question I cannot answer?
Mike
C'mon guys, the old codger clearly is confused as is often the case with alzheimers. Let's cut him some slack and repeat the question for the umpteenth timeThanks, I don't know who are doing all those strange things and what is it aimed at. If you worry, you should call the police or something. I am doing my thing at http://heiwaco.com
When someone you know is afflicted with this disease you will be asking them the same things over and over every day, each time they will not remember anything.
It must be this delicious nespresso from Heiwa that still keeps him somewhat lucid if not a little loopy
Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on December 06, 2017, 00:38:38
I want to ask this one:
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?
Since you're too stupid to figure it our for yourself, I'll help you out.
Actually I have no idea what you are on about. You sound like a twerp.
I want to ask this one:Notice where he says "I want to ask this one".
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?
I think I already answered I couldn't. My expertize is just nuclear weapons (they didn't work 1945 and later), manned, human space travel (not possible ever), static and dynamic structural analysis (tops cannot crush bottoms by gravity 911), fusion on Earth (not possible) and safety at sea. Safety at sea can always be improved.Since you're too stupid to figure it our for yourself, I'll help you out.
Actually I have no idea what you are on about. You sound like a twerp.I want to ask this one:Notice where he says "I want to ask this one".
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?
Can you answer this or not?
Mike
Expertise? Where did you get your degrees regarding nuclear physics? How about astrophysics? Rocket science?I think I already answered I couldn't. My expertize is just nuclear weapons (they didn't work 1945 and later), manned, human space travel (not possible ever), static and dynamic structural analysis (tops cannot crush bottoms by gravity 911), fusion on Earth (not possible) and safety at sea. Safety at sea can always be improved.Since you're too stupid to figure it our for yourself, I'll help you out.
Actually I have no idea what you are on about. You sound like a twerp.I want to ask this one:Notice where he says "I want to ask this one".
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?
Can you answer this or not?
Mike
I explain it at http://heiwaco.com .Expertise? Where did you get your degrees regarding nuclear physics? How about astrophysics? Rocket science?I think I already answered I couldn't. My expertize is just nuclear weapons (they didn't work 1945 and later), manned, human space travel (not possible ever), static and dynamic structural analysis (tops cannot crush bottoms by gravity 911), fusion on Earth (not possible) and safety at sea. Safety at sea can always be improved.Since you're too stupid to figure it our for yourself, I'll help you out.
Actually I have no idea what you are on about. You sound like a twerp.I want to ask this one:Notice where he says "I want to ask this one".
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?
Can you answer this or not?
Mike
It's a simple question you can answer here. Where did you your degrees in nuclear physics and astrophysics? Rocket science? Of course if you are afraid to answer you can keep dodging the question and referring back to your website. But that only shows you beca liar and fraud.I explain it at http://heiwaco.com .Expertise? Where did you get your degrees regarding nuclear physics? How about astrophysics? Rocket science?I think I already answered I couldn't. My expertize is just nuclear weapons (they didn't work 1945 and later), manned, human space travel (not possible ever), static and dynamic structural analysis (tops cannot crush bottoms by gravity 911), fusion on Earth (not possible) and safety at sea. Safety at sea can always be improved.Since you're too stupid to figure it our for yourself, I'll help you out.
Actually I have no idea what you are on about. You sound like a twerp.I want to ask this one:Notice where he says "I want to ask this one".
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?
Can you answer this or not?
Mike
I think he got them out of the Sears catalog.The local Kinko's.
Then again, Heiwa could be the greatest troll of all time....Entirely possible. That's some dedication.
How dare you call yourself an expert in nuclear weapons. You don’t even know the basics of nuclear reactions. You don’t even know what a moderator does. How could you possibly claim to be an expert? I know volumes more than you on the subject do and I don’t consider myself an expert. You draw conclusions from the work of others. Work that you’ve quoted, copied and pasted, and linked to on your crappy little site. Other that your conclusions there is not one thing on your website that you can call your own.I think I already answered I couldn't. My expertize is just nuclear weapons (they didn't work 1945 and later), manned, human space travel (not possible ever), static and dynamic structural analysis (tops cannot crush bottoms by gravity 911), fusion on Earth (not possible) and safety at sea. Safety at sea can always be improved.Since you're too stupid to figure it our for yourself, I'll help you out.
Actually I have no idea what you are on about. You sound like a twerp.I want to ask this one:Notice where he says "I want to ask this one".
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?
Can you answer this or not?
Mike
A box of Cracker Jacks.I think he got them out of the Sears catalog.The local Kinko's.
Of course I am an expert ... of safety at sea. My insight into nuclear weapons is limited to know a Nobel Prize winner, MS, that was asked to build a Swedish a-bomb 1945, which he accepted with subjects, and a nice German, Wilhelm M, that happened to assist Stalin building a fake Soviet a-bomb 1946/58 with 0.01% uranium from Wismut AG ore. It suffices for me. You see I am a source of original info. I liked MS 1964 that advised me to avoid physics. And I liked WM for telling me about Stalin, etc.How dare you call yourself an expert in nuclear weapons. You don’t even know the basics of nuclear reactions. You don’t even know what a moderator does. How could you possibly claim to be an expert? I know volumes more than you on the subject do and I don’t consider myself an expert. You draw conclusions from the work of others. Work that you’ve quoted, copied and pasted, and linked to on your crappy little site. Other that your conclusions there is not one thing on your website that you can call your own.I think I already answered I couldn't. My expertize is just nuclear weapons (they didn't work 1945 and later), manned, human space travel (not possible ever), static and dynamic structural analysis (tops cannot crush bottoms by gravity 911), fusion on Earth (not possible) and safety at sea. Safety at sea can always be improved.Since you're too stupid to figure it our for yourself, I'll help you out.
Actually I have no idea what you are on about. You sound like a twerp.I want to ask this one:Notice where he says "I want to ask this one".
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?
Can you answer this or not?
Mike
You’re no expert. Just a conspiracy theory crackpot.
Mike
So you admit you lied when you sad you were an expert in nuclear physics and human space travelOf course I am an expert ... of safety at sea. My insight into nuclear weapons is limited to know a Nobel Prize winner, MS, that was asked to build a Swedish a-bomb 1945, which he accepted with subjects, and a nice German, Wilhelm M, that happened to assist Stalin building a fake Soviet a-bomb 1946/58 with 0.01% uranium from Wismut AG ore. It suffices for me. You see I am a source of original info. I liked MS 1964 that advised me to avoid physics. And I liked WM for telling me about Stalin, etc.How dare you call yourself an expert in nuclear weapons. You don’t even know the basics of nuclear reactions. You don’t even know what a moderator does. How could you possibly claim to be an expert? I know volumes more than you on the subject do and I don’t consider myself an expert. You draw conclusions from the work of others. Work that you’ve quoted, copied and pasted, and linked to on your crappy little site. Other that your conclusions there is not one thing on your website that you can call your own.I think I already answered I couldn't. My expertize is just nuclear weapons (they didn't work 1945 and later), manned, human space travel (not possible ever), static and dynamic structural analysis (tops cannot crush bottoms by gravity 911), fusion on Earth (not possible) and safety at sea. Safety at sea can always be improved.Since you're too stupid to figure it our for yourself, I'll help you out.
Actually I have no idea what you are on about. You sound like a twerp.I want to ask this one:Notice where he says "I want to ask this one".
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?
Can you answer this or not?
Mike
You’re no expert. Just a conspiracy theory crackpot.
Mike
You just confirm that you are a twerp at every post. You are not even a moderator of a website.
No. I only said I am an expert of safety at sea. Are you an expert of anything?So you admit you lied when you sad you were an expert in nuclear physics and human space travelOf course I am an expert ... of safety at sea. My insight into nuclear weapons is limited to know a Nobel Prize winner, MS, that was asked to build a Swedish a-bomb 1945, which he accepted with subjects, and a nice German, Wilhelm M, that happened to assist Stalin building a fake Soviet a-bomb 1946/58 with 0.01% uranium from Wismut AG ore. It suffices for me. You see I am a source of original info. I liked MS 1964 that advised me to avoid physics. And I liked WM for telling me about Stalin, etc.How dare you call yourself an expert in nuclear weapons. You don’t even know the basics of nuclear reactions. You don’t even know what a moderator does. How could you possibly claim to be an expert? I know volumes more than you on the subject do and I don’t consider myself an expert. You draw conclusions from the work of others. Work that you’ve quoted, copied and pasted, and linked to on your crappy little site. Other that your conclusions there is not one thing on your website that you can call your own.I think I already answered I couldn't. My expertize is just nuclear weapons (they didn't work 1945 and later), manned, human space travel (not possible ever), static and dynamic structural analysis (tops cannot crush bottoms by gravity 911), fusion on Earth (not possible) and safety at sea. Safety at sea can always be improved.Since you're too stupid to figure it our for yourself, I'll help you out.
Actually I have no idea what you are on about. You sound like a twerp.I want to ask this one:Notice where he says "I want to ask this one".
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?
Can you answer this or not?
Mike
You’re no expert. Just a conspiracy theory crackpot.
Mike
You just confirm that you are a twerp at every post. You are not even a moderator of a website.
Liar. You said, in this thread, your expertise is nuclear weapons, human space travel and safety at sea. Can you simply not help lying?No. I only said I am an expert of safety at sea. Are you an expert of anything?So you admit you lied when you sad you were an expert in nuclear physics and human space travelOf course I am an expert ... of safety at sea. My insight into nuclear weapons is limited to know a Nobel Prize winner, MS, that was asked to build a Swedish a-bomb 1945, which he accepted with subjects, and a nice German, Wilhelm M, that happened to assist Stalin building a fake Soviet a-bomb 1946/58 with 0.01% uranium from Wismut AG ore. It suffices for me. You see I am a source of original info. I liked MS 1964 that advised me to avoid physics. And I liked WM for telling me about Stalin, etc.How dare you call yourself an expert in nuclear weapons. You don’t even know the basics of nuclear reactions. You don’t even know what a moderator does. How could you possibly claim to be an expert? I know volumes more than you on the subject do and I don’t consider myself an expert. You draw conclusions from the work of others. Work that you’ve quoted, copied and pasted, and linked to on your crappy little site. Other that your conclusions there is not one thing on your website that you can call your own.I think I already answered I couldn't. My expertize is just nuclear weapons (they didn't work 1945 and later), manned, human space travel (not possible ever), static and dynamic structural analysis (tops cannot crush bottoms by gravity 911), fusion on Earth (not possible) and safety at sea. Safety at sea can always be improved.Since you're too stupid to figure it our for yourself, I'll help you out.
Actually I have no idea what you are on about. You sound like a twerp.I want to ask this one:Notice where he says "I want to ask this one".
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?
Can you answer this or not?
Mike
You’re no expert. Just a conspiracy theory crackpot.
Mike
You just confirm that you are a twerp at every post. You are not even a moderator of a website.
Of course I am an expert ... of safety at sea. My insight into nuclear weapons is limited to know a Nobel Prize winner, MS, that was asked to build a Swedish a-bomb 1945, which he accepted with subjects, and a nice German, Wilhelm M, that happened to assist Stalin building a fake Soviet a-bomb 1946/58 with 0.01% uranium from Wismut AG ore. It suffices for me.Just out of curiosity, did either Nobel Prize winning MS or nice German Wilhelm M specifically tell you that nuclear bombs are impossible?
You see I am a source of original info.Nope. MS and WM are sources of original info. You are a source of second hand info.
I liked MS 1964 that advised me to avoid physics.I agree with MS wholeheartedly. You should avoid physics because you are so bad at it.
And I liked WM for telling me about Stalin, etc.But did WM tell you that the nuclear bombs that he worked on were fake?
You see I am a source of original info.
Nope. MS and WM are sources of original info. You are a source of second hand info.
YOU ARE A LIAR!No. I only said I am an expert of safety at sea. Are you an expert of anything?So you admit you lied when you sad you were an expert in nuclear physics and human space travelOf course I am an expert ... of safety at sea. My insight into nuclear weapons is limited to know a Nobel Prize winner, MS, that was asked to build a Swedish a-bomb 1945, which he accepted with subjects, and a nice German, Wilhelm M, that happened to assist Stalin building a fake Soviet a-bomb 1946/58 with 0.01% uranium from Wismut AG ore. It suffices for me. You see I am a source of original info. I liked MS 1964 that advised me to avoid physics. And I liked WM for telling me about Stalin, etc.How dare you call yourself an expert in nuclear weapons. You don’t even know the basics of nuclear reactions. You don’t even know what a moderator does. How could you possibly claim to be an expert? I know volumes more than you on the subject do and I don’t consider myself an expert. You draw conclusions from the work of others. Work that you’ve quoted, copied and pasted, and linked to on your crappy little site. Other that your conclusions there is not one thing on your website that you can call your own.I think I already answered I couldn't. My expertize is just nuclear weapons (they didn't work 1945 and later), manned, human space travel (not possible ever), static and dynamic structural analysis (tops cannot crush bottoms by gravity 911), fusion on Earth (not possible) and safety at sea. Safety at sea can always be improved.Since you're too stupid to figure it our for yourself, I'll help you out.
Actually I have no idea what you are on about. You sound like a twerp.I want to ask this one:Notice where he says "I want to ask this one".
Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?
Can you answer this or not?
Mike
You’re no expert. Just a conspiracy theory crackpot.
Mike
You just confirm that you are a twerp at every post. You are not even a moderator of a website.
Well, you really have to read what I describe about nuclear weapons at http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm . It is hilarious. They do not work!Of course I am an expert ... of safety at sea. My insight into nuclear weapons is limited to know a Nobel Prize winner, MS, that was asked to build a Swedish a-bomb 1945, which he accepted with subjects, and a nice German, Wilhelm M, that happened to assist Stalin building a fake Soviet a-bomb 1946/58 with 0.01% uranium from Wismut AG ore. It suffices for me.Just out of curiosity, did either Nobel Prize winning MS or nice German Wilhelm M specifically tell you that nuclear bombs are impossible?You see I am a source of original info.Nope. MS and WM are sources of original info. You are a source of second hand info.I liked MS 1964 that advised me to avoid physics.I agree with MS wholeheartedly. You should avoid physics because you are so bad at it.And I liked WM for telling me about Stalin, etc.But did WM tell you that the nuclear bombs that he worked on were fake?
But did WM tell you that the nuclear bombs that he worked on were fake?<long ramble which did not answer the simple question asked snipped>
Well, you really have to read what I describe about nuclear weapons at http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm . It is hilarious. They do not work!At what point did MS find that nuclear weapons were fake? As near as I can tell, the Swedish government shut him down before he even began his research because they didn't want the research released to the public.
MS got the Nobel Prize physics for his work about structures of matter in the 1920’s. So 1945 the Swedish government asked MS to be head of Swedish military, secret weapons research and build a Swedish atomic bomb. MS agreed subject to all findings becoming public after proper peer review. The Swedish government didn’t like that and asked MS to shut up about his finding that nuclear weapons were fake news and propaganda.
1964 I discussed the matter with MS who correctly observed that physics was mainly low paid teacher jobs unless you faked it and invented research of all kind, incl. atomic bombs and humans in space. Thus to be avoided.Did he say "fake" or did you add that part yourself?
1999 I met WM who in his youth 1946/58 had worked for Wismut AG, East Germany, producing uranium so Stalin could build his atomic bomb that ‘exploded’ 1949. The bomb was built by other slaves in Siberia.So, he didn't actually work on the bomb. Good to know.
Wismut AG was a German slave labour camp run by the KGB digging holes in the ground producing nothing but propaganda. WM spoke Russian and was employed as an expert of kind to keep the illusion alive.What exactly did he tell you about about the mining operations and what did you add yourself?
You have to read what I say at my webpage. WM thought he worked for the Peace at Wismut AG (during winters) but soon realized that Wismut AG was a criminal entity run by the KGB to keep Stalin happy. Wismut AG didn't build nuclear bombs. Wismut AG was a mining company digging holes in the ground.But did WM tell you that the nuclear bombs that he worked on were fake?<long ramble which did not answer the simple question asked snipped>
But did WM tell you that the nuclear bombs that he worked on were fake?
Thanks for asking.Well, you really have to read what I describe about nuclear weapons at http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm . It is hilarious. They do not work!At what point did MS find that nuclear weapons were fake? As near as I can tell, the Swedish government shut him down before he even began his research because they didn't want the research released to the public.
MS got the Nobel Prize physics for his work about structures of matter in the 1920’s. So 1945 the Swedish government asked MS to be head of Swedish military, secret weapons research and build a Swedish atomic bomb. MS agreed subject to all findings becoming public after proper peer review. The Swedish government didn’t like that and asked MS to shut up about his finding that nuclear weapons were fake news and propaganda.1964 I discussed the matter with MS who correctly observed that physics was mainly low paid teacher jobs unless you faked it and invented research of all kind, incl. atomic bombs and humans in space. Thus to be avoided.Did he say "fake" or did you add that part yourself?1999 I met WM who in his youth 1946/58 had worked for Wismut AG, East Germany, producing uranium so Stalin could build his atomic bomb that ‘exploded’ 1949. The bomb was built by other slaves in Siberia.So, he didn't actually work on the bomb. Good to know.Wismut AG was a German slave labour camp run by the KGB digging holes in the ground producing nothing but propaganda. WM spoke Russian and was employed as an expert of kind to keep the illusion alive.What exactly did he tell you about about the mining operations and what did you add yourself?
Allow me to paraphrase Heiwa's harang . . . . .
(28 seconds)
Allow me to paraphrase Heiwa's harang . . . . .
(28 seconds)
Accurate.
Allow me to paraphrase Heiwa's harang . . . . .
(28 seconds)
I assume Bohr told MS that the whole thing was a hoax/propaganda, etc, etc.So you assume, but don't know for sure. Glad that we cleared that up.
MS told me 1964 that physics was mainly bad paying teacher jobs and ... that research, etc, was often faked to make other people happy. I think he had lost his illusions then.So he never specifically said that nuclear bomb research was fake. Glad that we cleared that up.
Re WM he was just watching the KGB running a slave camp in Germany. If he had complained about it, he would be shot. It seems Soviet occupation zone in Germany was a violent place.So WM had no idea of what was going on at the the mines. Glad that we cleared that up.
Yes, I am happy you can read what I write at http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm . As I always say. MS didn't 1964 recommend physics as a career for obvious reasons. Totally corrupt or badly paid.I assume Bohr told MS that the whole thing was a hoax/propaganda, etc, etc.So you assume, but don't know for sure. Glad that we cleared that up.MS told me 1964 that physics was mainly bad paying teacher jobs and ... that research, etc, was often faked to make other people happy. I think he had lost his illusions then.So he never specifically said that nuclear bomb research was fake. Glad that we cleared that up.Re WM he was just watching the KGB running a slave camp in Germany. If he had complained about it, he would be shot. It seems Soviet occupation zone in Germany was a violent place.So WM had no idea of what was going on at the the mines. Glad that we cleared that up.
Yes, I am happy you can read what I write at http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm .I don't care what you write at your monstrosity of a web site. I care about what you write here.
As I always say. MS didn't 1964 recommend physics as a career for obvious reasons. Totally corrupt or badly paid.But he didn't specifically say that nuclear bombs were fake.
Yes, WM, having survived WW2, watched the KGB running slave camps in Saxony, Germany. Of course he knew what was going on below ground of those slave camps. The German slaves were cutting holes in the ground. Of no value at all.Well, I can't imagine that the holes were of much value to the slave laborers, but that doesn't say anything about the value of what was coming out of those holes to Soviet bomb makers.
Can you imagine that?
Please reply and do not ask more stupid questions.It's not my fault that your posts raise more questions than they answer.
May heiwa be a bot? ??
May heiwa be a bot? ??Unfortunately he's real.
May heiwa be a bot? ??Unfortunately he's real.
Sounds like something that a bot would say.May heiwa be a bot? ??Unfortunately he's real.
$7 says you can't prove it.
May heiwa be a bot? ??Unfortunately he's real.
$7 says you can't prove it.
May heiwa be a bot? ??Unfortunately he's real.
$7 says you can't prove it.
You remind me of that one guy who got some random guy killed over a $2 call of duty debt.
May heiwa be a bot? ??Unfortunately he's real.
Allow me to paraphrase Heiwa's harang . . . . .
(28 seconds)
Hm, he hasn't a website like me - http://heiwaco.com
Don't ask me that!
Don't ask me that!
May heiwa be a bot? ??Unfortunately he's real.
Alzheimer'?
So Heiwa.... Why do you lie all the time and why are you such a dick?
Thanks for a topic/question. Sorry to answer with a question: Do you drink coffee in your toilet?So Heiwa.... Why do you lie all the time and why are you such a dick?
Heiwa - "Ummm, I'm gunna need 60 cents for the coffee, wanna see my toilet?"
How do I enter a question? Are you a bot like Google Assistant or a real human being.Thanks for a topic/question. Sorry to answer with a question: Do you drink coffee in your toilet?So Heiwa.... Why do you lie all the time and why are you such a dick?
Heiwa - "Ummm, I'm gunna need 60 cents for the coffee, wanna see my toilet?"
How do I enter a question? Are you a bot like Google Assistant or a real human being.Thanks for a topic/question. Sorry to answer with a question: Do you drink coffee in your toilet?So Heiwa.... Why do you lie all the time and why are you such a dick?
Heiwa - "Ummm, I'm gunna need 60 cents for the coffee, wanna see my toilet?"
We had a Arealhumanbeing here once, but he ran off to be the "Leader of the Second American Revolution" at age 16!
Do I just start with "OK Heiwa", sort of like "OK Google".
Well,
Q: Show me how to calculate a delta-V budget to move from a LEO at 200 km altitude to a LLO at 100 km altitude, thanks.
And how do you intend to drop down to LLO?I know it's easy to get confused at your stage in life, but I think he was asking you.
And how do you intend to drop down to LLO?I know it's easy to get confused at your stage in life, but I think he was asking you.
Happy to help out and clarify things when needed.
Have nice day!
Boots
Oh, I have a question . . .Thanks for asking. I started school autumn 1953 and was taught basic math, 1+1=? etc, then by a friendly female professor. I graduated 1969 (M.Sc) and for that plenty math was required incl. solving differential equations, etc, etc. What math is you referring to?
Heiwa, was math invented after you became an engineer?
I'm not sure about the bolded part, but otherwise that was a pretty reasonable response to my post. This is rare for you.And how do you intend to drop down to LLO?I know it's easy to get confused at your stage in life, but I think he was asking you.
Happy to help out and clarify things when needed.
Have nice day!
Boots
Thanks. I know he is asking me (in a thread not started by me). So I need some extra information to reply. A spacecraft in LEO is different from a spacecraft in LLO and you have to get rid of plenty energy going from LEO to LLO.
I know NASA says that you use a heat shield and air friction drag to slow down but there is no air between LEO and LLO. Also gravity differs between LEO and LLO. So to answer the question I need some more info.
http://heiwacrap.com
I deleted that post so that I can add a bit about orbital decay rates. I guess it won't affect your post.http://heiwacrap.com
As far as I know, LEO refers to Low Earth Orbit and LLO refers to Low Lunar Orbit. A spacecraft cannot really orbit the earth at 100 km.Do I just start with "OK Heiwa", sort of like "OK Google".
Well,
Q: Show me how to calculate a delta-V budget to move from a LEO at 200 km altitude to a LLO at 100 km altitude, thanks.
Thanks for asking. Sorry I didn't notice your question until now.
So you are flying in LEO at 200 000 m altitude and want to drop down to 100 000 m altitude in LLO. Why not?
So what type of spacecraft is it and what is your original speed (m/s) and mass (kg) in LEO? And how do you intend to drop down to LLO?
Have to you tried to push the brake pedal? It is in the middle! More answers at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm .
These lifetimes are very approximate and depend on solar flux etc. Below 200 km altitude, the lifetime falls dramatically.Even from 200 km, it's only about 29 hours and below 180 km your better have your heat shield properly oriented or you're crispy bacon real fast.
Satellite
Altitude Lifetime
200 km 1.2 days
195 km 0.8 days
190 km 0.5 days
185 km 0.2 days
180 km 0.1 days
translation: I don't know how to calculate that which shows I don't know even the basic concepts to judge my fraudulent "challenges". Let me try to deflect so hopefully you won't notice I have no clue what I'm talking about.How do I enter a question? Are you a bot like Google Assistant or a real human being.Thanks for a topic/question. Sorry to answer with a question: Do you drink coffee in your toilet?So Heiwa.... Why do you lie all the time and why are you such a dick?
Heiwa - "Ummm, I'm gunna need 60 cents for the coffee, wanna see my toilet?"
We had a Arealhumanbeing here once, but he ran off to be the "Leader of the Second American Revolution" at age 16!
Do I just start with "OK Heiwa", sort of like "OK Google".
Well,
Q: Show me how to calculate a delta-V budget to move from a LEO at 200 km altitude to a LLO at 100 km altitude, thanks.
Thanks for asking. Sorry I didn't notice your question until now.
So you are flying in LEO at 200 000 m altitude and want to drop down to 100 000 m altitude in LLO. Why not?
So what type of spacecraft is it and what is your original speed (m/s) and mass (kg) in LEO? And how do you intend to drop down to LLO?
Have to you tried to push the brake pedal? It is in the middle! More answers at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm .
As far as I know, LEO refers to Low Earth Orbit and LLO refers to Low Lunar Orbit. A spacecraft cannot really orbit the earth at 100 km.Do I just start with "OK Heiwa", sort of like "OK Google".
Well,
Q: Show me how to calculate a delta-V budget to move from a LEO at 200 km altitude to a LLO at 100 km altitude, thanks.
Thanks for asking. Sorry I didn't notice your question until now.
So you are flying in LEO at 200 000 m altitude and want to drop down to 100 000 m altitude in LLO. Why not?
So what type of spacecraft is it and what is your original speed (m/s) and mass (kg) in LEO? And how do you intend to drop down to LLO?
Have to you tried to push the brake pedal? It is in the middle! More answers at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm .
Look at these typical orbital lifetimes:These lifetimes are very approximate and depend on solar flux etc. Below 200 km altitude, the lifetime falls dramatically.Even from 200 km, it's only about 29 hours and below 180 km your better have your heat shield properly oriented or you're crispy bacon real fast.
Satellite
Altitude Lifetime
200 km 1.2 days
195 km 0.8 days
190 km 0.5 days
185 km 0.2 days
180 km 0.1 days
In any case, I asked for the delta-V, the mass is not needed to calculate that.
Why would you ask for the velocity when you know thst are flying in LEO at 200 000 m altitude.
If you don't know trivia like that, why would I waste my time with http://heiwacrap.com/moontravel.htm (https://static.wixstatic.com/media/aab213_fff5a7d1b5a240178da051382ca988e8~mv2_d_1316_2128_s_2.jpg/v1/fill/w_1200,h_1940,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/aab213_fff5a7d1b5a240178da051382ca988e8~mv2_d_1316_2128_s_2.webp).
To calculate a delta-v for any space fiction getting out of a JGO you need to know your mass before/after activating your rocket engine and also the velocity of your exhaust. This according to comrade Tsiolkowsky. I think he is right and Gagarin faked it.Incorrect!
To calculate a delta-v for any space fiction getting out of a JGO you need to know your mass before/after activating your rocket engine and also the velocity of your exhaust. This according to comrade Tsiolkowsky. I think he is right and Gagarin faked it.Incorrect!
You only need the mass before/after the burn (from the mass ratio) to find the fuel burn from the required delta-V.
Try again!
But since I never asked for a LEO of 100 km,
make it more practical and calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO.
If you can't understand that and come up with an answer, you are a total fraud.
Ok prove it. Show your evidence here, where you made the claim. There is no evidence on your pathetic website, there is only you whining like a little bitch that you can't understand it so it must be false.To calculate a delta-v for any space fiction getting out of a JGO you need to know your mass before/after activating your rocket engine and also the velocity of your exhaust. This according to comrade Tsiolkowsky. I think he is right and Gagarin faked it.Incorrect!
You only need the mass before/after the burn (from the mass ratio) to find the fuel burn from the required delta-V.
Try again!
But since I never asked for a LEO of 100 km,
make it more practical and calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO.
If you can't understand that and come up with an answer, you are a total fraud.
Well, the original question remains how to go from Low Earth Orbit, LEO, to Low Lunar Orbit, LLO. The answer is, of course, that it cannot be done at all.
If you manage to get off the ground and into LEO, you don't have the fuel to get out of LEO and later brake to get into LLO, if you reach the target. You are bound to crash or just disappear into the Milky Way.
Juri Gagarin just tried to get into and out of LEO 1961 and he was a total fraud. John Glenn copied it 1962 and he too was a total fraud. You sound like a twerp believing in Father Christmas and the Tooth Fairy.
Incorrect! If you disagree, show your evidence and my being a twerp doesn't count - ;) I already know that! ;).To calculate a delta-v for any space fiction getting out of a JGO you need to know your mass before/after activating your rocket engine and also the velocity of your exhaust. This according to comrade Tsiolkowsky. I think he is right and Gagarin faked it.Incorrect!
You only need the mass before/after the burn (from the mass ratio) to find the fuel burn from the required delta-V.
Try again!
But since I never asked for a LEO of 100 km,
make it more practical and calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO.
If you can't understand that and come up with an answer, you are a total fraud.
Well, the original question remains how to go from Low Earth Orbit, LEO, to Low Lunar Orbit, LLO. The answer is, of course, that it cannot be done at all.
If you manage to get off the ground and into LEO, you don't have the fuel to get out of LEO and later brake to get into LLO, if you reach the target. You are bound to crash or just disappear into the Milky Way.
make it more practical and calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO.Since many payloads launched by Arianespace end up in GEO surely you believe that one.
If you can't understand that and come up with an answer, you are a total fraud.
The answer is, of course, that it cannot be done at all.
Gather round ladies and gentlemen,Yes. It cannot be done and I explain why at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm free of charge.
Bullwinkle is about to win the challenge . . .
"It cannot be done at all."
Tell me, Heiwa, is that the answer?The answer is, of course, that it cannot be done at all.
More baseless claims. You continue to fail. You could always prove me wrong and post your evidence here.Gather round ladies and gentlemen,Yes. It cannot be done and I explain why at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm free of charge.
Bullwinkle is about to win the challenge . . .
"It cannot be done at all."
Tell me, Heiwa, is that the answer?The answer is, of course, that it cannot be done at all.
But you have to (1) click on the link, (2) read what I say, (3) think about it, etc.
It seems you cannot do it.
IMHO you are a twerp.
This thread was started by some twerp suggesting you could ask me anything. And when I do it, obnoxious twerps move in with their piss and shit. Why?More baseless claims. You continue to fail. You could always prove me wrong and post your evidence here.Gather round ladies and gentlemen,Yes. It cannot be done and I explain why at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm free of charge.
Bullwinkle is about to win the challenge . . .
"It cannot be done at all."
Tell me, Heiwa, is that the answer?The answer is, of course, that it cannot be done at all.
But you have to (1) click on the link, (2) read what I say, (3) think about it, etc.
It seems you cannot do it.
IMHO you are a twerp.
This thread was started by some twerp suggesting you could ask me anything. And when I do it, obnoxious twerps move in with their piss and shit. Why?
More failure. Why are you so obsessed with other people's piss and shit? Is that your sexual fetish?This thread was started by some twerp suggesting you could ask me anything. And when I do it, obnoxious twerps move in with their piss and shit. Why?More baseless claims. You continue to fail. You could always prove me wrong and post your evidence here.Gather round ladies and gentlemen,Yes. It cannot be done and I explain why at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm free of charge.
Bullwinkle is about to win the challenge . . .
"It cannot be done at all."
Tell me, Heiwa, is that the answer?The answer is, of course, that it cannot be done at all.
But you have to (1) click on the link, (2) read what I say, (3) think about it, etc.
It seems you cannot do it.
IMHO you are a twerp.
I thought you started this thread to discuss human space travel. Re foreign languages by chance/necessity I have worked in various countries and it gave me an opportunity to pick up many local languages. My cv is at http://heiwaco.com/cv.htm .This thread was started by some twerp suggesting you could ask me anything. And when I do it, obnoxious twerps move in with their piss and shit. Why?
That's a bit rough Heiwa, I figured to start a thread where you could share your wisdom on any subject and not just limited to your challenges for a change. I asked you an honest question which you seem to have ignored. Twerps ignore honest questions. Are you a twerp??
I am genuinely curious. How many languages are you fluent in?. As I understand it, the ability to speak more than one is a mark of intelligence. I am assuming you know at least 3. You were born in Sweden, live in France and talk with us in English. That's a pretty good effort. Is there any more?
Anders, what is the highest orbit possible, and why is it impossible to go any higher?My understanding of orbits is at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B .
translation: I can't answer that. Here is some stuff to try to distract you.Anders, what is the highest orbit possible, and why is it impossible to go any higher?My understanding of orbits are at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B .
No - from the link provided:translation: I can't answer that. Here is some stuff to try to distract you.Anders, what is the highest orbit possible, and why is it impossible to go any higher?My understanding of orbits are at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B .
An orbit is the gravitationally curved path of an object A around a point B in space or the path followed by one heavenly body A, e.g. a planet, a moon or an artificial satellite around another planet or the Sun, object B, without any power used. A geocentric orbit is around Earth, a heliocentric orbit is around the Sun. Normally the mass of object A is much smaller than the mass of object B.Just read what I write and avoid stupid comments.
I thought you started this thread to discuss human space travel. Re foreign languages by chance/necessity I have worked in various countries and it gave me an opportunity to pick up many local languages. My cv is at http://heiwaco.com/cv.htm .This thread was started by some twerp suggesting you could ask me anything. And when I do it, obnoxious twerps move in with their piss and shit. Why?
That's a bit rough Heiwa, I figured to start a thread where you could share your wisdom on any subject and not just limited to your challenges for a change. I asked you an honest question which you seem to have ignored. Twerps ignore honest questions. Are you a twerp??
I am genuinely curious. How many languages are you fluent in?. As I understand it, the ability to speak more than one is a mark of intelligence. I am assuming you know at least 3. You were born in Sweden, live in France and talk with us in English. That's a pretty good effort. Is there any more?
What you write is proof you don't understand the subject.No - from the link provided:translation: I can't answer that. Here is some stuff to try to distract you.Anders, what is the highest orbit possible, and why is it impossible to go any higher?My understanding of orbits are at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B .QuoteAn orbit is the gravitationally curved path of an object A around a point B in space or the path followed by one heavenly body A, e.g. a planet, a moon or an artificial satellite around another planet or the Sun, object B, without any power used. A geocentric orbit is around Earth, a heliocentric orbit is around the Sun. Normally the mass of object A is much smaller than the mass of object B.Just read what I write and avoid stupid comments.
So there is no limit of an orbit.
Just read what I write and avoid stupid comments.
There isn't a discussion forum on that site. I want you to answer here, if you're able.Anders, what is the highest orbit possible, and why is it impossible to go any higher?My understanding of orbits is at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B .
Well, the answer is at my site. Twerps do not understand it, though.There isn't a discussion forum on that site. I want you to answer here, if you're able.Anders, what is the highest orbit possible, and why is it impossible to go any higher?My understanding of orbits is at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B .
Shouldn't that be, "All Heiwa's lack of understanding of orbits, etc, is at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B."Anders, what is the highest orbit possible, and why is it impossible to go any higher?My understanding of orbits is at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B .
make it more practical and calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO.Since many payloads launched by Arianespace end up in GEO surely you believe that one.
Shouldn't that be, "All Heiwa's lack of understanding of orbits, etc, is at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B."Anders, what is the highest orbit possible, and why is it impossible to go any higher?My understanding of orbits is at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B .
I'm still waiting for an answer for this simple problem:make it more practical and calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO.Since many payloads launched by Arianespace end up in GEO surely you believe that one.
Or is Arianespace simply dumping satellites up there "somewhere"?
I said nothing in that post about "sending humans to the Moon and Mars and sending robot spacecrafts to anywhere in the Universe"!Shouldn't that be, "All Heiwa's lack of understanding of orbits, etc, is at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B."Anders, what is the highest orbit possible, and why is it impossible to go any higher?My understanding of orbits is at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B .
I'm still waiting for an answer for this simple problem:make it more practical and calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO.Since many payloads launched by Arianespace end up in GEO surely you believe that one.
Or is Arianespace simply dumping satellites up there "somewhere"?
No, Arianespace just launches various satellites, all unmanned, into various Earth orbits since many years ... and it is all it does. As an Airbus NV happy shareholder I am also owner of Ariancespace, so I am happy about it.
I explain more at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm .
Then there are plenty criminal outfits stating they can do much better, e.g. sending humans to the Moon and Mars and sending robot spacecrafts to anywhere in the Universe. They are all just paid liars.
Ariane 5 overview
Arianespace’s Ariane 5 is the world reference for heavy-lift launchers, able to carry payloads weighing more than 10 metric tons to geostationary transfer orbit (GTO) and over 20 metric tons into low-Earth orbit (LEO).
Heiwa what do you make of the NASA missions of Juno and New Horizons? They are unmanned. What makes it impossible for them to reach as far as they did?Thanks for asking. I describe the unmanned New Horizons at http://heiwaco.tripod.com/moontravelw2.htm#116 . I consider it total fantasy. You better ask Alan Stern about it. He is the pilot!
Use your own words from today. Not a link to an article written years ago. I want you to answer me like I'm a person in your office
What prevents anything leaving the gravitational pull of the earth and if you don't believe it has happened yet, can you think of a circumstance in the future where it could be done? I am not talking about people in space, but unmanned probes.
If the answer is at your site, then you shouldn't have any trouble copying and pasting it here.Well, the answer is at my site. Twerps do not understand it, though.There isn't a discussion forum on that site. I want you to answer here, if you're able.Anders, what is the highest orbit possible, and why is it impossible to go any higher?My understanding of orbits is at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B .
Liar. There are no answers at your pathetic site. The only evidence there is evidence of your stupidity.Well, the answer is at my site. Twerps do not understand it, though.There isn't a discussion forum on that site. I want you to answer here, if you're able.Anders, what is the highest orbit possible, and why is it impossible to go any higher?My understanding of orbits is at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B .
I thought you said you could read but you just confirmed that you don't understand what you read. Just click on the link provided to find out more.Liar. There are no answers at your pathetic site. The only evidence there is evidence of your stupidity.Well, the answer is at my site. Twerps do not understand it, though.There isn't a discussion forum on that site. I want you to answer here, if you're able.Anders, what is the highest orbit possible, and why is it impossible to go any higher?My understanding of orbits is at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B .
Prove me wrong and post your evidence here.
Of course you can't because you are a lying fraud who is too stupid to realize how stupid you are.
Anders, trying to find an answer on your web site is like trying to get an answer out of you: far too much effort for far too little reward.I thought you said you could read but you just confirmed that you don't understand what you read. Just click on the link provided to find out more.Liar. There are no answers at your pathetic site. The only evidence there is evidence of your stupidity.Well, the answer is at my site. Twerps do not understand it, though.There isn't a discussion forum on that site. I want you to answer here, if you're able.Anders, what is the highest orbit possible, and why is it impossible to go any higher?My understanding of orbits is at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B .
Prove me wrong and post your evidence here.
Of course you can't because you are a lying fraud who is too stupid to realize how stupid you are.
More failure. There is no evidence on your website. There is no proof you have the money to pay your challenge. You are a liar and a fraud.I thought you said you could read but you just confirmed that you don't understand what you read. Just click on the link provided to find out more.Liar. There are no answers at your pathetic site. The only evidence there is evidence of your stupidity.Well, the answer is at my site. Twerps do not understand it, though.There isn't a discussion forum on that site. I want you to answer here, if you're able.Anders, what is the highest orbit possible, and why is it impossible to go any higher?My understanding of orbits is at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B .
Prove me wrong and post your evidence here.
Of course you can't because you are a lying fraud who is too stupid to realize how stupid you are.
Heiwa what do you make of the NASA missions of Juno and New Horizons? They are unmanned. What makes it impossible for them to reach as far as they did?Thanks for asking. I describe the unmanned New Horizons at http://www.ratemypoo.com. I consider it total fantasy. You better ask Alan Stern about it. He is the pilot!
Use your own words from today. Not a link to an article written years ago. I want you to answer me like I'm a person in your office
What prevents anything leaving the gravitational pull of the earth and if you don't believe it has happened yet, can you think of a circumstance in the future where it could be done? I am not talking about people in space, but unmanned probes.
The Juno mission I describe at the end of http://www.ratemypoo.com. It is a another NASA fakery. Juno is supposed to look for water on planet Jupiter but I can assure you there so no water there. It is too cold.
What do you find wrong with my observations?
He can't answer anything. All he can do is lie and fail. And while it's true no one wants to see his shit he is clearly obsessed with other people's bodily wastes. It seems to be his fetish.Heiwa what do you make of the NASA missions of Juno and New Horizons? They are unmanned. What makes it impossible for them to reach as far as they did?Thanks for asking. I describe the unmanned New Horizons at http://www.ratemypoo.com. I consider it total fantasy. You better ask Alan Stern about it. He is the pilot!
Use your own words from today. Not a link to an article written years ago. I want you to answer me like I'm a person in your office
What prevents anything leaving the gravitational pull of the earth and if you don't believe it has happened yet, can you think of a circumstance in the future where it could be done? I am not talking about people in space, but unmanned probes.
The Juno mission I describe at the end of http://www.ratemypoo.com. It is a another NASA fakery. Juno is supposed to look for water on planet Jupiter but I can assure you there so no water there. It is too cold.
What do you find wrong with my observations?
Heiwa are you really this dense?? I clearly asked you not to refer to your webpage and give me an answer on this site. Why are you so worried about answering a question on this forum? Your site is sick and no one wants to see your shit
Heiwa what do you make of the NASA missions of Juno and New Horizons? They are unmanned. What makes it impossible for them to reach as far as they did?Thanks for asking. I describe the unmanned New Horizons at http://www.ratemypoo.com. I consider it total fantasy. You better ask Alan Stern about it. He is the pilot!
Use your own words from today. Not a link to an article written years ago. I want you to answer me like I'm a person in your office
What prevents anything leaving the gravitational pull of the earth and if you don't believe it has happened yet, can you think of a circumstance in the future where it could be done? I am not talking about people in space, but unmanned probes.
The Juno mission I describe at the end of http://www.ratemypoo.com. It is a another NASA fakery. Juno is supposed to look for water on planet Jupiter but I can assure you there so no water there. It is too cold.
What do you find wrong with my observations?
Heiwa are you really this dense?? I clearly asked you not to refer to your webpage and give me an answer on this site. Why are you so worried about answering a question on this forum? Your site is sick and no one wants to see your shit
Heiwa what do you make of the NASA missions of Juno and New Horizons? They are unmanned. What makes it impossible for them to reach as far as they did?Thanks for asking. I describe the unmanned New Horizons at http://www.ratemypoo.com. I consider it total fantasy. You better ask Alan Stern about it. He is the pilot!
Use your own words from today. Not a link to an article written years ago. I want you to answer me like I'm a person in your office
What prevents anything leaving the gravitational pull of the earth and if you don't believe it has happened yet, can you think of a circumstance in the future where it could be done? I am not talking about people in space, but unmanned probes.
The Juno mission I describe at the end of http://www.ratemypoo.com. It is a another NASA fakery. Juno is supposed to look for water on planet Jupiter but I can assure you there so no water there. It is too cold.
What do you find wrong with my observations?
Heiwa are you really this dense?? I clearly asked you not to refer to your webpage and give me an answer on this site. Why are you so worried about answering a question on this forum? Your site is sick and no one wants to see your shit
No, I am quite intelligent and honest when answering you. As you can see the answers to your questions are already at my popular website ... so I refer to it. IMHO you are intellectually dishonest with your behavior at this forum.
But I am curious. Do you believe you win an argument by being obnoxious?
Heiwa, would you be able calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No. I leave that to my Arianespace experts. It is quite simple to modify any Earth orbit. Problem is to know your location in LEO to start the transfer and to end up in the required location in GEO. My expertise is safety at sea and structural analysis. I have also met people that were asked to build atomic bombs in the 1940's and declined.
It's OK if you can't, just say so.
Heiwa, would you be able calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No. I leave that to my Arianespace experts. It is quite simple to modify any Earth orbit. Problem is to know your location in LEO to start the transfer and to end up in the required location in GEO. My expertise is safety at sea and structural analysis. I have also met people that were asked to build atomic bombs in the 1940's and declined.
It's OK if you can't, just say so.
Heiwa, have you ever been wrong about anything?He thought that he was wrong once, but he was mistaken.
If so, what?
I am sorry you cannot understand what I write at http://heiwaco.com .Heiwa, would you be able calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No. I leave that to my Arianespace experts. It is quite simple to modify any Earth orbit. Problem is to know your location in LEO to start the transfer and to end up in the required location in GEO. My expertise is safety at sea and structural analysis. I have also met people that were asked to build atomic bombs in the 1940's and declined.
It's OK if you can't, just say so.
In other words, you post all that rubbish on your website about how all sorts of things are impossible, yet you can't do a simple orbital calculation!
Well, that explains why your website is full of nothing but ignorant crap.
OK your "expertise is safety at sea and structural analysis" and that means absolutely nothing when it comes to humans in space, yet you have the audacity to pretend to be an expert in that!
I am sorry you cannot understand what I write at www.ratemypoo.com.Heiwa, would you be able calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No. I leave that to my Arianespace experts. It is quite simple to modify any Earth orbit. Problem is to know your location in LEO to start the transfer and to end up in the required location in GEO. My expertise is safety at sea and structural analysis. I have also met people that were asked to build atomic bombs in the 1940's and declined.
It's OK if you can't, just say so.
In other words, you post all that rubbish on your website about how all sorts of things are impossible, yet you can't do a simple orbital calculation!
Well, that explains why your website is full of nothing but ignorant crap.
OK your "expertise is safety at sea and structural analysis" and that means absolutely nothing when it comes to humans in space, yet you have the audacity to pretend to be an expert in that!
Heiwa, would you be able calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No.
It's OK if you can't, just say so.
This is literally you admitting you don't have the knowledge to judge your fake challenge.Heiwa, would you be able calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No. I leave that to my Arianespace experts. It is quite simple to modify any Earth orbit. Problem is to know your location in LEO to start the transfer and to end up in the required location in GEO. My expertise is safety at sea and structural analysis. I have also met people that were asked to build atomic bombs in the 1940's and declined.
It's OK if you can't, just say so.
Of course not. I just receive the applications to win my Challenge. I have plenty associates to review them. You sound like a twerp.This is literally you admitting you don't have the knowledge to judge your fake challenge.Heiwa, would you be able calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No. I leave that to my Arianespace experts. It is quite simple to modify any Earth orbit. Problem is to know your location in LEO to start the transfer and to end up in the required location in GEO. My expertise is safety at sea and structural analysis. I have also met people that were asked to build atomic bombs in the 1940's and declined.
It's OK if you can't, just say so.
Name your associatesI believe that Anders the Jerkman is telling you that he hasn't the slightest idea what he's talking about and is going to get some local schoolkids to do it for him.
Heiwa, would you be able to calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No.
And you have failed again. Until you publicly prove you have the money your challenge is fake and you are a liar and a fraud. Let's not forget stupid and a failure but that's beside the point.Of course not. I just receive the applications to win my Challenge. I have plenty associates to review them. You sound like a twerp.This is literally you admitting you don't have the knowledge to judge your fake challenge.Heiwa, would you be able calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No. I leave that to my Arianespace experts. It is quite simple to modify any Earth orbit. Problem is to know your location in LEO to start the transfer and to end up in the required location in GEO. My expertise is safety at sea and structural analysis. I have also met people that were asked to build atomic bombs in the 1940's and declined.
It's OK if you can't, just say so.
Do any of those associates believe that NASA landed astronauts on the moon in 1969-72?Of course not. I just receive the applications to win my Challenge. I have plenty associates to review them. You sound like a twerp.This is literally you admitting you don't have the knowledge to judge your fake challenge.Heiwa, would you be able calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No. I leave that to my Arianespace experts. It is quite simple to modify any Earth orbit. Problem is to know your location in LEO to start the transfer and to end up in the required location in GEO. My expertise is safety at sea and structural analysis. I have also met people that were asked to build atomic bombs in the 1940's and declined.
It's OK if you can't, just say so.
Hm, anyone is welcome to my office to check anything. I even offer coffee. You are just a twerp so you are not welcome.And you have failed again. Until you publicly prove you have the money your challenge is fake and you are a liar and a fraud. Let's not forget stupid and a failure but that's beside the point.Of course not. I just receive the applications to win my Challenge. I have plenty associates to review them. You sound like a twerp.This is literally you admitting you don't have the knowledge to judge your fake challenge.Heiwa, would you be able calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No. I leave that to my Arianespace experts. It is quite simple to modify any Earth orbit. Problem is to know your location in LEO to start the transfer and to end up in the required location in GEO. My expertise is safety at sea and structural analysis. I have also met people that were asked to build atomic bombs in the 1940's and declined.
It's OK if you can't, just say so.
Again you have failed. It's really all you can do. You don't have the money, you don't have any evidence to support your bullshit claims. You have nothing but failure.Hm, anyone is welcome to my office to check anything. I even offer coffee. You are just a twerp so you are not welcome.And you have failed again. Until you publicly prove you have the money your challenge is fake and you are a liar and a fraud. Let's not forget stupid and a failure but that's beside the point.Of course not. I just receive the applications to win my Challenge. I have plenty associates to review them. You sound like a twerp.This is literally you admitting you don't have the knowledge to judge your fake challenge.Heiwa, would you be able calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No. I leave that to my Arianespace experts. It is quite simple to modify any Earth orbit. Problem is to know your location in LEO to start the transfer and to end up in the required location in GEO. My expertise is safety at sea and structural analysis. I have also met people that were asked to build atomic bombs in the 1940's and declined.
It's OK if you can't, just say so.
No, twerps are always wrong and cannot understand it. That's why you are a twerp!Again you have failed. It's really all you can do. You don't have the money, you don't have any evidence to support your bullshit claims. You have nothing but failure.Hm, anyone is welcome to my office to check anything. I even offer coffee. You are just a twerp so you are not welcome.And you have failed again. Until you publicly prove you have the money your challenge is fake and you are a liar and a fraud. Let's not forget stupid and a failure but that's beside the point.Of course not. I just receive the applications to win my Challenge. I have plenty associates to review them. You sound like a twerp.This is literally you admitting you don't have the knowledge to judge your fake challenge.Heiwa, would you be able calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No. I leave that to my Arianespace experts. It is quite simple to modify any Earth orbit. Problem is to know your location in LEO to start the transfer and to end up in the required location in GEO. My expertise is safety at sea and structural analysis. I have also met people that were asked to build atomic bombs in the 1940's and declined.
It's OK if you can't, just say so.
Prove me wrong.
Heiwa, would you be able to calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No.
? But I explain at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B to go to the L1 point.Heiwa, would you be able to calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No.
Heiwa, would you be able to calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No.
Wait, did you just fail again? Yeah, that's what happened. You are a fraud, your challenge is a fake and you are a liar.No, twerps are always wrong and cannot understand it. That's why you are a twerp!Again you have failed. It's really all you can do. You don't have the money, you don't have any evidence to support your bullshit claims. You have nothing but failure.Hm, anyone is welcome to my office to check anything. I even offer coffee. You are just a twerp so you are not welcome.And you have failed again. Until you publicly prove you have the money your challenge is fake and you are a liar and a fraud. Let's not forget stupid and a failure but that's beside the point.Of course not. I just receive the applications to win my Challenge. I have plenty associates to review them. You sound like a twerp.This is literally you admitting you don't have the knowledge to judge your fake challenge.Heiwa, would you be able calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No. I leave that to my Arianespace experts. It is quite simple to modify any Earth orbit. Problem is to know your location in LEO to start the transfer and to end up in the required location in GEO. My expertise is safety at sea and structural analysis. I have also met people that were asked to build atomic bombs in the 1940's and declined.
It's OK if you can't, just say so.
Prove me wrong.
Liar. You only make baseless claims on that shithole of a website. Prove me wrong, post your explanation here. You can't of course because you are a liar and a fraud. And you will prove it with your very next post where you will fail to provide any evidence for your idiotic claims.? But I explain at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B to go to the L1 point.Heiwa, would you be able to calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No.
There are no lies at my popular website. I am always intellectually honest, you know. Not like a twerp like you. That's why I have become rich in my business.Liar. You only make baseless claims on that shithole of a website. Prove me wrong, post your explanation here. You can't of course because you are a liar and a fraud. And you will prove it with your very next post where you will fail to provide any evidence for your idiotic claims.? But I explain at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B to go to the L1 point.Heiwa, would you be able to calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No.
Prove me wrong.
There are no lies at myYour website is full of bald, completely unsubstantiated statements. Perhaps instead of calling them lies we could call them "Heiwa's opinions", many of which are incorrect.popularwebsite.
Heiwa, what happened to your avatar?
Please expand! And incorrect?There are no lies at myYour website is full of bald, completely unsubstantiated statements. Perhaps instead of calling them lies we could call them "Heiwa's opinions", many of which are incorrect.popularwebsite.
Once again you have failed to prove me wrong. Because you know I am not wrong. You are a fraud, a failure and a liar.There are no lies at my popular website. I am always intellectually honest, you know. Not like a twerp like you. That's why I have become rich in my business.Liar. You only make baseless claims on that shithole of a website. Prove me wrong, post your explanation here. You can't of course because you are a liar and a fraud. And you will prove it with your very next post where you will fail to provide any evidence for your idiotic claims.? But I explain at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm#B to go to the L1 point.Heiwa, would you be able to calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No.
Prove me wrong.
Do you have any business? What can a twerp do for a living?
LOLHeiwa, would you be able to calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No.
I did say that Heiwa's ignorance of the simplest orbital mechaincs was proven.LOLHeiwa, would you be able to calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No.
Well, you can ask me anything and most answers are at my website http://heiwaco.com, so look for them there.I did say that Heiwa's ignorance of the simplest orbital mechaincs was proven.LOLHeiwa, would you be able to calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No.
Stop already. I've caught you lying about your money so just stop. Nobody believes you have €5 million to pay off all your challenges.Hm, anyone is welcome to my office to check anything. I even offer coffee. You are just a twerp so you are not welcome.And you have failed again. Until you publicly prove you have the money your challenge is fake and you are a liar and a fraud. Let's not forget stupid and a failure but that's beside the point.Of course not. I just receive the applications to win my Challenge. I have plenty associates to review them. You sound like a twerp.This is literally you admitting you don't have the knowledge to judge your fake challenge.Heiwa, would you be able calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No. I leave that to my Arianespace experts. It is quite simple to modify any Earth orbit. Problem is to know your location in LEO to start the transfer and to end up in the required location in GEO. My expertise is safety at sea and structural analysis. I have also met people that were asked to build atomic bombs in the 1940's and declined.
It's OK if you can't, just say so.
Well, you can ask me anything
No, you talk nonsense as usual. Haven't you understood that nobody can win my Challenges? Study the conditions at http://heiwaco.com/chall.htm . Only twerps believe I would pay a Nobel Prize winner €1M telling me how to ignite a nuclear bomb, how to knock off a bow visor on a ship without anyone noticing, etc, etc.Stop already. I've caught you lying about your money so just stop. Nobody believes you have €5 million to pay off all your challenges.Hm, anyone is welcome to my office to check anything. I even offer coffee. You are just a twerp so you are not welcome.And you have failed again. Until you publicly prove you have the money your challenge is fake and you are a liar and a fraud. Let's not forget stupid and a failure but that's beside the point.Of course not. I just receive the applications to win my Challenge. I have plenty associates to review them. You sound like a twerp.This is literally you admitting you don't have the knowledge to judge your fake challenge.Heiwa, would you be able calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No. I leave that to my Arianespace experts. It is quite simple to modify any Earth orbit. Problem is to know your location in LEO to start the transfer and to end up in the required location in GEO. My expertise is safety at sea and structural analysis. I have also met people that were asked to build atomic bombs in the 1940's and declined.
It's OK if you can't, just say so.
Mike
I am not aware that Arianespace can put 21 tonnes payload in orbit. Any source?Well, you can ask me anything
OK. You've already admitted you can't calculate basic orbital mechanics problems, how about answering this:
Would a highly reputable company like Arianspace specifically claim that they can deliver 19 and 21 tonnes of fuel to a non-existent International Space Station?
So are you denying that I've caught you lying about your money?No, you talk nonsense as usual. Haven't you understood that nobody can win my Challenges? Study the conditions at http://heiwaco.com/chall.htm . Only twerps believe I would pay a Nobel Prize winner €1M telling me how to ignite a nuclear bomb, how to knock off a bow visor on a ship without anyone noticing, etc, etc.Stop already. I've caught you lying about your money so just stop. Nobody believes you have €5 million to pay off all your challenges.Hm, anyone is welcome to my office to check anything. I even offer coffee. You are just a twerp so you are not welcome.And you have failed again. Until you publicly prove you have the money your challenge is fake and you are a liar and a fraud. Let's not forget stupid and a failure but that's beside the point.Of course not. I just receive the applications to win my Challenge. I have plenty associates to review them. You sound like a twerp.This is literally you admitting you don't have the knowledge to judge your fake challenge.Heiwa, would you be able calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No. I leave that to my Arianespace experts. It is quite simple to modify any Earth orbit. Problem is to know your location in LEO to start the transfer and to end up in the required location in GEO. My expertise is safety at sea and structural analysis. I have also met people that were asked to build atomic bombs in the 1940's and declined.
It's OK if you can't, just say so.
Mike
The latter is interesting. I was >20 years ago informed that the visor was maybe knocked off in a collision with a US Navy sub. Even a name of the sub was given. So I contacted known US sailors if they had any info about it, some replied and all said no. Later I found out that the visor was blown off the wreck under water by my own navy. Imagine that. The visor case is still open. Next year it is 25 years since the Swedish prime minister ordered a cover-up and murder of people in the know.
Hint: Click on the big red link, then scroll to section 2.4.5I am not aware that Arianespace can put 21 tonnes payload in orbit. Any source?Well, you can ask me anything
OK. You've already admitted you can't calculate basic orbital mechanics problems, how about answering this:
Would a highly reputable company like Arianspace specifically claim that they can deliver 19 and 21 tonnes of fuel to a non-existent International Space Station?
Actually everyone understands nobody can win your challenges. For several reasons. You don't have the money. You are too stupid to understand the answers. In short you have simply failed again.No, you talk nonsense as usual. Haven't you understood that nobody can win my Challenges?Stop already. I've caught you lying about your money so just stop. Nobody believes you have €5 million to pay off all your challenges.Hm, anyone is welcome to my office to check anything. I even offer coffee. You are just a twerp so you are not welcome.And you have failed again. Until you publicly prove you have the money your challenge is fake and you are a liar and a fraud. Let's not forget stupid and a failure but that's beside the point.Of course not. I just receive the applications to win my Challenge. I have plenty associates to review them. You sound like a twerp.This is literally you admitting you don't have the knowledge to judge your fake challenge.Heiwa, would you be able calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No. I leave that to my Arianespace experts. It is quite simple to modify any Earth orbit. Problem is to know your location in LEO to start the transfer and to end up in the required location in GEO. My expertise is safety at sea and structural analysis. I have also met people that were asked to build atomic bombs in the 1940's and declined.
It's OK if you can't, just say so.
Mike
Actually everyone understands nobody can win your challenges. For several reasons. You don't have the money. You are too stupid to understand the answers. In short you have simply failed again.No, you talk nonsense as usual. Haven't you understood that nobody can win my Challenges?Stop already. I've caught you lying about your money so just stop. Nobody believes you have €5 million to pay off all your challenges.Hm, anyone is welcome to my office to check anything. I even offer coffee. You are just a twerp so you are not welcome.And you have failed again. Until you publicly prove you have the money your challenge is fake and you are a liar and a fraud. Let's not forget stupid and a failure but that's beside the point.Of course not. I just receive the applications to win my Challenge. I have plenty associates to review them. You sound like a twerp.This is literally you admitting you don't have the knowledge to judge your fake challenge.Heiwa, would you be able calculate the two delta-Vs needed to transfer from a circular LEO at 200 km to a circular GEO?No. I leave that to my Arianespace experts. It is quite simple to modify any Earth orbit. Problem is to know your location in LEO to start the transfer and to end up in the required location in GEO. My expertise is safety at sea and structural analysis. I have also met people that were asked to build atomic bombs in the 1940's and declined.
It's OK if you can't, just say so.
Mike
Well, you can ask me anything
No I think Arianespace has never delivered anything to the fake ISFS. You see, Arianespace only delivers payloads into orbits. I explain more at http://heiwaco.com .Well, you can ask me anything
OK. You've already more or less admitted you can't calculate basic orbital mechanics problems, how about answering this:
Would a highly reputable company like Arianspace specifically claim that they can deliver 19 and 21 tonnes of fuel to a non-existent International Space Station?
You must be really stupid. You continue to answer questions I did not ask! The question is not whether Arianespace has delivered anything to the ISS, it is whether they claim they can serve the ISS or not. I will keep asking until you answer the question!No I think Arianespace has never delivered anything to the fake ISFS. You see, Arianespace only delivers payloads into orbits. I explain more at http://heiwaco.com .Well, you can ask me anything
OK. You've already more or less admitted you can't calculate basic orbital mechanics problems, how about answering this:
Would a highly reputable company like Arianspace specifically claim that they can deliver 19 and 21 tonnes of fuel to a non-existent International Space Station?
No I think Arianespace has never delivered anything to the fake ISFS. You see, Arianespace only delivers payloads into orbits. I explain more at http://heiwaco.com .You must be really stupid. You continue to answer questions I did not ask! The question is not whether Arianespace has delivered anything to the ISS, it is whether they claim they can serve the ISS or not. I will keep asking until you answer the question!No I think Arianespace has never delivered anything to the fake ISFS. You see, Arianespace only delivers payloads into orbits. I explain more at http://heiwaco.com .Well, you can ask me anything
OK. You've already more or less admitted you can't calculate basic orbital mechanics problems, how about answering this:
Would a highly reputable company like Arianspace specifically claim that they can deliver 19 and 21 tonnes of fuel to a non-existent International Space Station?
Does a highly reputable company like Arianspace specifically claim that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t"?
Yes? or No?
No.You must be really stupid. You continue to answer questions I did not ask! The question is not whether Arianespace has delivered anything to the ISS, it is whether they claim they can serve the ISS or not. I will keep asking until you answer the question!No I think Arianespace has never delivered anything to the fake ISFS. You see, Arianespace only delivers payloads into orbits. I explain more at http://heiwashit.com .Well, you can ask me anything
OK. You've already more or less admitted you can't calculate basic orbital mechanics problems, how about answering this:
Would a highly reputable company like Arianspace specifically claim that they can deliver 19 and 21 tonnes of fuel to a non-existent International Space Station?
Does a highly reputable company like Arianspace specifically claim that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t"?
Yes? or No?
It is correct that Arianespace works for NASA/ESA and puts NASA/ESA spacecrafts full of supplies into orbits.No.You must be really stupid. You continue to answer questions I did not ask! The question is not whether Arianespace has delivered anything to the ISS, it is whether they claim they can serve the ISS or not. I will keep asking until you answer the question!No I think Arianespace has never delivered anything to the fake ISFS. You see, Arianespace only delivers payloads into orbits. I explain more at http://heiwashit.com .Well, you can ask me anything
OK. You've already more or less admitted you can't calculate basic orbital mechanics problems, how about answering this:
Would a highly reputable company like Arianspace specifically claim that they can deliver 19 and 21 tonnes of fuel to a non-existent International Space Station?
Does a highly reputable company like Arianspace specifically claim that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t"?
Yes? or No?
You are incorrect. Arianspace does indeed claim that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t".
Do you believe them or do you think Arianspace is lying?
How do you feel about being a shareholder in a company that believes NASA, believes in the ISS, and is too stupid to realize the whole thing is an elaborate hoax?It is correct that Arianespace works for NASA/ESA and puts NASA/ESA spacecrafts full of supplies into orbits.No.You must be really stupid. You continue to answer questions I did not ask! The question is not whether Arianespace has delivered anything to the ISS, it is whether they claim they can serve the ISS or not. I will keep asking until you answer the question!No I think Arianespace has never delivered anything to the fake ISFS. You see, Arianespace only delivers payloads into orbits. I explain more at http://heiwashit.com .Well, you can ask me anything
OK. You've already more or less admitted you can't calculate basic orbital mechanics problems, how about answering this:
Would a highly reputable company like Arianspace specifically claim that they can deliver 19 and 21 tonnes of fuel to a non-existent International Space Station?
Does a highly reputable company like Arianspace specifically claim that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t"?
Yes? or No?
You are incorrect. Arianspace does indeed claim that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t".
Do you believe them or do you think Arianspace is lying?
After that NASA/ESA takes over and steers their spacecraft to dock with the ISS. How the latter is done is not clear to me but NASA/ESA tells Arianespace that it works, so it seems Arianespace puts it in their manuals.
I show that the 400 tonnes heavy ISS is 100% fake and does not exist.
How do you feel about being a shareholder in a company that believes NASA, believes in the ISS, and is too stupid to realize the whole thing is an elaborate hoax?It is correct that Arianespace works for NASA/ESA and puts NASA/ESA spacecrafts full of supplies into orbits.No.You must be really stupid. You continue to answer questions I did not ask! The question is not whether Arianespace has delivered anything to the ISS, it is whether they claim they can serve the ISS or not. I will keep asking until you answer the question!No I think Arianespace has never delivered anything to the fake ISFS. You see, Arianespace only delivers payloads into orbits. I explain more at http://heiwashit.com .Well, you can ask me anything
OK. You've already more or less admitted you can't calculate basic orbital mechanics problems, how about answering this:
Would a highly reputable company like Arianspace specifically claim that they can deliver 19 and 21 tonnes of fuel to a non-existent International Space Station?
Does a highly reputable company like Arianspace specifically claim that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t"?
Yes? or No?
You are incorrect. Arianspace does indeed claim that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t".
Do you believe them or do you think Arianspace is lying?
After that NASA/ESA takes over and steers their spacecraft to dock with the ISS. How the latter is done is not clear to me but NASA/ESA tells Arianespace that it works, so it seems Arianespace puts it in their manuals.
I show that the 400 tonnes heavy ISS is 100% fake and does not exist.
You’re just going to keep posting and ignoring my question (see below). You’re just providing further proof you’re lying about your money.No I think Arianespace has never delivered anything to the fake ISFS. You see, Arianespace only delivers payloads into orbits. I explain more at http://heiwaco.com .Well, you can ask me anything
OK. You've already more or less admitted you can't calculate basic orbital mechanics problems, how about answering this:
Would a highly reputable company like Arianspace specifically claim that they can deliver 19 and 21 tonnes of fuel to a non-existent International Space Station?
So are you denying that I've caught you lying about your money?No, you talk nonsense as usual. Haven't you understood that nobody can win my Challenges? Study the conditions at http://heiwaco.com/chall.htm . Only twerps believe I would pay a Nobel Prize winner €1M telling me how to ignite a nuclear bomb, how to knock off a bow visor on a ship without anyone noticing, etc, etc.Hm, anyone is welcome to my office to check anything. I even offer coffee. You are just a twerp so you are not welcome.Stop already. I've caught you lying about your money so just stop. Nobody believes you have €5 million to pay off all your challenges.
Mike
The latter is interesting. I was >20 years ago informed that the visor was maybe knocked off in a collision with a US Navy sub. Even a name of the sub was given. So I contacted known US sailors if they had any info about it, some replied and all said no. Later I found out that the visor was blown off the wreck under water by my own navy. Imagine that. The visor case is still open. Next year it is 25 years since the Swedish prime minister ordered a cover-up and murder of people in the know.
You’re just going to keep posting and ignoring my question (see below). You’re just providing further proof you’re lying about your money.No I think Arianespace has never delivered anything to the fake ISFS. You see, Arianespace only delivers payloads into orbits. I explain more at http://heiwaco.com .Well, you can ask me anything
OK. You've already more or less admitted you can't calculate basic orbital mechanics problems, how about answering this:
Would a highly reputable company like Arianspace specifically claim that they can deliver 19 and 21 tonnes of fuel to a non-existent International Space Station?
MikeSo are you denying that I've caught you lying about your money?No, you talk nonsense as usual. Haven't you understood that nobody can win my Challenges? Study the conditions at http://heiwaco.com/chall.htm . Only twerps believe I would pay a Nobel Prize winner €1M telling me how to ignite a nuclear bomb, how to knock off a bow visor on a ship without anyone noticing, etc, etc.Hm, anyone is welcome to my office to check anything. I even offer coffee. You are just a twerp so you are not welcome.Stop already. I've caught you lying about your money so just stop. Nobody believes you have €5 million to pay off all your challenges.
Mike
The latter is interesting. I was >20 years ago informed that the visor was maybe knocked off in a collision with a US Navy sub. Even a name of the sub was given. So I contacted known US sailors if they had any info about it, some replied and all said no. Later I found out that the visor was blown off the wreck under water by my own navy. Imagine that. The visor case is still open. Next year it is 25 years since the Swedish prime minister ordered a cover-up and murder of people in the know.
I asked only one question so stop stalling.You’re just going to keep posting and ignoring my question (see below). You’re just providing further proof you’re lying about your money.No I think Arianespace has never delivered anything to the fake ISFS. You see, Arianespace only delivers payloads into orbits. I explain more at http://heiwaco.com .Well, you can ask me anything
OK. You've already more or less admitted you can't calculate basic orbital mechanics problems, how about answering this:
Would a highly reputable company like Arianspace specifically claim that they can deliver 19 and 21 tonnes of fuel to a non-existent International Space Station?
MikeSo are you denying that I've caught you lying about your money?No, you talk nonsense as usual. Haven't you understood that nobody can win my Challenges? Study the conditions at http://heiwaco.com/chall.htm . Only twerps believe I would pay a Nobel Prize winner €1M telling me how to ignite a nuclear bomb, how to knock off a bow visor on a ship without anyone noticing, etc, etc.Hm, anyone is welcome to my office to check anything. I even offer coffee. You are just a twerp so you are not welcome.Stop already. I've caught you lying about your money so just stop. Nobody believes you have €5 million to pay off all your challenges.
Mike
The latter is interesting. I was >20 years ago informed that the visor was maybe knocked off in a collision with a US Navy sub. Even a name of the sub was given. So I contacted known US sailors if they had any info about it, some replied and all said no. Later I found out that the visor was blown off the wreck under water by my own navy. Imagine that. The visor case is still open. Next year it is 25 years since the Swedish prime minister ordered a cover-up and murder of people in the know.
Please, just one question at a time.
That was one question you moronYou’re just going to keep posting and ignoring my question (see below). You’re just providing further proof you’re lying about your money.No I think Arianespace has never delivered anything to the fake ISFS. You see, Arianespace only delivers payloads into orbits. I explain more at http://heiwaco.com .Well, you can ask me anything
OK. You've already more or less admitted you can't calculate basic orbital mechanics problems, how about answering this:
Would a highly reputable company like Arianspace specifically claim that they can deliver 19 and 21 tonnes of fuel to a non-existent International Space Station?
MikeSo are you denying that I've caught you lying about your money?No, you talk nonsense as usual. Haven't you understood that nobody can win my Challenges? Study the conditions at http://heiwaco.com/chall.htm . Only twerps believe I would pay a Nobel Prize winner €1M telling me how to ignite a nuclear bomb, how to knock off a bow visor on a ship without anyone noticing, etc, etc.Hm, anyone is welcome to my office to check anything. I even offer coffee. You are just a twerp so you are not welcome.Stop already. I've caught you lying about your money so just stop. Nobody believes you have €5 million to pay off all your challenges.
Mike
The latter is interesting. I was >20 years ago informed that the visor was maybe knocked off in a collision with a US Navy sub. Even a name of the sub was given. So I contacted known US sailors if they had any info about it, some replied and all said no. Later I found out that the visor was blown off the wreck under water by my own navy. Imagine that. The visor case is still open. Next year it is 25 years since the Swedish prime minister ordered a cover-up and murder of people in the know.
Please, just one question at a time.
So just to be clear:
- You own shares in Airbus which is major shareholder in Arianspace.
- Arianspace makes untrue claims to its shareholders because they are being duped by NASA.
- You don't care if the company in which you own shares is gullible and possibly dishonest as long as NASA pays with money they've duped the taxpayer into paying them, and you make a profit.
Is this correct?
Can you explain please.So just to be clear:
- You own shares in Airbus which is major shareholder in Arianspace.
- Arianspace makes untrue claims to its shareholders because they are being duped by NASA.
- You don't care if the company in which you own shares is gullible and possibly dishonest as long as NASA pays with money they've duped the taxpayer into paying them, and you make a profit.
Is this correct?
Yes and no.
Can you explain please.So just to be clear:
- You own shares in Airbus which is major shareholder in Arianspace.
- Arianspace makes untrue claims to its shareholders because they are being duped by NASA.
- You don't care if the company in which you own shares is gullible and possibly dishonest as long as NASA pays with money they've duped the taxpayer into paying them, and you make a profit.
Is this correct?
Yes and no.
Also, you haven't answered Mike's question yet.
I explain everything at my website.No you don't!
I explain everything at my website.No you don't!
All you do is repeatedly prove that because you can't understand how things are done that those things are impossible.
Maybe you should learn that,
- you are far from being the smartest cookie in the cookie barrel and
- these problems in orbital dynamics that you claim are impossible are not solved by one person on an abacus but by a group of astronomers and experts in rocketry, orbital mechanics and orbital dynamics on computers.
You you, with your proven ignorance in many of these topics have the audacity to claim that because you cannot understand it no-one can!
What an ignoramus, a real honest to goodness twerp!
Can you explain please.So just to be clear:
- You own shares in Airbus which is major shareholder in Arianspace.
- Arianspace makes untrue claims to its shareholders because they are being duped by NASA.
- You don't care if the company in which you own shares is gullible and possibly dishonest as long as NASA pays with money they've duped the taxpayer into paying them, and you make a profit.
Is this correct?
Yes and no.
Also, you haven't answered Mike's question yet.
I explain everything at my website.
I have seen your ravings and I explained them above! Have you forgotten how to read?I explain everything at my website.No you don't!
All you do is repeatedly prove that because you can't understand how things are done that those things are impossible.
Maybe you should learn that,
- you are far from being the smartest cookie in the cookie barrel and
- these problems in orbital dynamics that you claim are impossible are not solved by one person on an abacus but by a group of astronomers and experts in rocketry, orbital mechanics and orbital dynamics on computers.
Yet you, with your proven ignorance in many of these topics have the audacity to claim that because you cannot understand it no-one can!
What an ignoramus, a real honest to goodness twerp!
No, my findings are at http://heiwaco.com since about 1998. If you find anything wrong just copy/paste it and tell me. Don't moan and groan that I am ignorant without any evidence. You sound like a twerp suffering from cognitive dissonance.
My faux fax are simply crazy conspiracy theories. Atomic bombs really work fine. Human beings can easily travel to the Moon or in space.Or did I misread it, after all, you claimed that, I "sound like a twerp suffering from cognitive dissonance".
No, my findings are at http://heiwaco.com since about 1998. If you find anything wrong just copy/paste it and tell me.Your site claims that manned space flight is fake. That's wrong. Please fix it.
No they aren't. There are no findings there. It's just you saying it's impossible. There is no evidence to support that. That's why you run away like a coward when asked to post any evidence here. You are a failure, a fraud and a coward.I explain everything at my website.No you don't!
All you do is repeatedly prove that because you can't understand how things are done that those things are impossible.
Maybe you should learn that,
- you are far from being the smartest cookie in the cookie barrel and
- these problems in orbital dynamics that you claim are impossible are not solved by one person on an abacus but by a group of astronomers and experts in rocketry, orbital mechanics and orbital dynamics on computers.
You you, with your proven ignorance in many of these topics have the audacity to claim that because you cannot understand it no-one can!
What an ignoramus, a real honest to goodness twerp!
No, my findings are at http://heiwaco.com since about 1998. If you find anything wrong just copy/paste it and tell me. Don't moan and groan that I am ignorant without any evidence. You sound like a twerp suffering from cognitive dissonance.
You don’t have any findings of your own. All you do is repost other people’s work, add some history, and then make unfounded conclusions. There’s no unique information...nothing original.I explain everything at my website.No you don't!
All you do is repeatedly prove that because you can't understand how things are done that those things are impossible.
Maybe you should learn that,
- you are far from being the smartest cookie in the cookie barrel and
- these problems in orbital dynamics that you claim are impossible are not solved by one person on an abacus but by a group of astronomers and experts in rocketry, orbital mechanics and orbital dynamics on computers.
You you, with your proven ignorance in many of these topics have the audacity to claim that because you cannot understand it no-one can!
What an ignoramus, a real honest to goodness twerp!
No, my findings are at http://heiwaco.com since about 1998. If you find anything wrong just copy/paste it and tell me. Don't moan and groan that I am ignorant without any evidence. You sound like a twerp suffering from cognitive dissonance.
?? I talk to a 1923 Nobel Prize winner physics 1964 about my future and he recommended engineering sciences for me! Later I found out he was asked to build a fake a-bomb ... and he declined. I met in Japan 1973 Japanese from Hiroshima/Japan that suggest no a-bombs hit their towns 1945. I met EM whose father EM assisted Stalin 1947-1958 to build a fake USSR atomic bomb that exploded 1959, etc, etc. EM and I watched 2001 together on TV the WTC destructions at NY. EM at once the footage was fake.You don’t have any findings of your own. All you do is repost other people’s work, add some history, and then make unfounded conclusions. There’s no unique information...nothing original.I explain everything at my website.No you don't!
All you do is repeatedly prove that because you can't understand how things are done that those things are impossible.
Maybe you should learn that,
- you are far from being the smartest cookie in the cookie barrel and
- these problems in orbital dynamics that you claim are impossible are not solved by one person on an abacus but by a group of astronomers and experts in rocketry, orbital mechanics and orbital dynamics on computers.
You you, with your proven ignorance in many of these topics have the audacity to claim that because you cannot understand it no-one can!
What an ignoramus, a real honest to goodness twerp!
No, my findings are at http://heiwaco.com since about 1998. If you find anything wrong just copy/paste it and tell me. Don't moan and groan that I am ignorant without any evidence. You sound like a twerp suffering from cognitive dissonance.
Mike
Can you explain please.So just to be clear:
- You own shares in Airbus which is major shareholder in Arianspace.
- Arianspace makes untrue claims to its shareholders because they are being duped by NASA.
- You don't care if the company in which you own shares is gullible and possibly dishonest as long as NASA pays with money they've duped the taxpayer into paying them, and you make a profit.
Is this correct?
Yes and no.
Also, you haven't answered Mike's question yet.
I explain everything at my website.
While I can believe a physicist told you you were too stupid to study physics, there is at least one straight up lie in your post. Can you find it??? I talk to a 1923 Nobel Prize winner physics 1964 about my future and he recommended engineering sciences for me! Later I found out he was asked to build a fake a-bomb ... and he declined. I met in Japan 1973 Japanese from Hiroshima/Japan that suggest no a-bombs hit their towns 1945. I met EM whose father EM assisted Stalin 1947-1958 to build a fake USSR atomic bomb that exploded 1959, etc, etc. EM and I watched 2001 together on TV the WTC destructions at NY. EM at once the footage was fake.You don’t have any findings of your own. All you do is repost other people’s work, add some history, and then make unfounded conclusions. There’s no unique information...nothing original.I explain everything at my website.No you don't!
All you do is repeatedly prove that because you can't understand how things are done that those things are impossible.
Maybe you should learn that,
- you are far from being the smartest cookie in the cookie barrel and
- these problems in orbital dynamics that you claim are impossible are not solved by one person on an abacus but by a group of astronomers and experts in rocketry, orbital mechanics and orbital dynamics on computers.
You you, with your proven ignorance in many of these topics have the audacity to claim that because you cannot understand it no-one can!
What an ignoramus, a real honest to goodness twerp!
No, my findings are at http://heiwaco.com since about 1998. If you find anything wrong just copy/paste it and tell me. Don't moan and groan that I am ignorant without any evidence. You sound like a twerp suffering from cognitive dissonance.
Mike
I think it is unique and original info. Just visit http://heiwaco.com for more of it.
How many times are you going to tell that same story? And no, I won't go to you measly little website. I’ve read it and it’s crap.?? I talk to a 1923 Nobel Prize winner physics 1964 about my future and he recommended engineering sciences for me! Later I found out he was asked to build a fake a-bomb ... and he declined. I met in Japan 1973 Japanese from Hiroshima/Japan that suggest no a-bombs hit their towns 1945. I met EM whose father EM assisted Stalin 1947-1958 to build a fake USSR atomic bomb that exploded 1959, etc, etc. EM and I watched 2001 together on TV the WTC destructions at NY. EM at once the footage was fake.You don’t have any findings of your own. All you do is repost other people’s work, add some history, and then make unfounded conclusions. There’s no unique information...nothing original.I explain everything at my website.No you don't!
All you do is repeatedly prove that because you can't understand how things are done that those things are impossible.
Maybe you should learn that,
- you are far from being the smartest cookie in the cookie barrel and
- these problems in orbital dynamics that you claim are impossible are not solved by one person on an abacus but by a group of astronomers and experts in rocketry, orbital mechanics and orbital dynamics on computers.
You you, with your proven ignorance in many of these topics have the audacity to claim that because you cannot understand it no-one can!
What an ignoramus, a real honest to goodness twerp!
No, my findings are at http://heiwaco.com since about 1998. If you find anything wrong just copy/paste it and tell me. Don't moan and groan that I am ignorant without any evidence. You sound like a twerp suffering from cognitive dissonance.
Mike
I think it is unique and original info. Just visit http://heiwaco.com for more of it.
Can you explain please.So just to be clear:
- You own shares in Airbus which is major shareholder in Arianspace.
- Arianspace makes untrue claims to its shareholders because they are being duped by NASA.
- You don't care if the company in which you own shares is gullible and possibly dishonest as long as NASA pays with money they've duped the taxpayer into paying them, and you make a profit.
Is this correct?
Yes and no.
Also, you haven't answered Mike's question yet.
I explain everything at my website.
I think that he means yes he can and no he won't.Can you explain please.So just to be clear:
- You own shares in Airbus which is major shareholder in Arianspace.
- Arianspace makes untrue claims to its shareholders because they are being duped by NASA.
- You don't care if the company in which you own shares is gullible and possibly dishonest as long as NASA pays with money they've duped the taxpayer into paying them, and you make a profit.
Is this correct?
Yes and no.
Also, you haven't answered Mike's question yet.
I explain everything at my website.
That is no more of an answer than your previous attempt!
Can you please explain what you mean by "Yes and no"?!
I think that he means yes he can and no he won't.
I think that he means yes he can and no he won't.Can you explain please.So just to be clear:
- You own shares in Airbus which is major shareholder in Arianspace.
- Arianspace makes untrue claims to its shareholders because they are being duped by NASA.
- You don't care if the company in which you own shares is gullible and possibly dishonest as long as NASA pays with money they've duped the taxpayer into paying them, and you make a profit.
Is this correct?
Yes and no.
Also, you haven't answered Mike's question yet.
I explain everything at my website.
That is no more of an answer than your previous attempt!
Can you please explain what you mean by "Yes and no"?!
No, my findings are at http://heiwaco.com since about 1998. If you find anything wrong just copy/paste it and tell me.Your site claims that manned space flight is fake. That's wrong. Please fix it.
So just to be clear:Yes - I own shares in Airbus.
- You own shares in Airbus which is major shareholder in Arianspace.
- Arianspace makes untrue claims to its shareholders because they are being duped by NASA.
- You don't care if the company in which you own shares is gullible and possibly dishonest as long as NASA pays with money they've duped the taxpayer into paying them, and you make a profit.
Is this correct?
I know you already answered this question but your answer appeared to be internally inconsistent. Can you please explain it simply.
All joking aside, how does a fucking retart like you accumulate 5,000,000 Euros?What is a fucking retart? You mean twerp? Look in the mirror.
No - Arianespace does not make untrue claims to shareholders or clients.
What is a fucking retart?
You mean twerp?
Look in the mirror.
What is a fucking retart?
You.You mean twerp?
OK.Look in the mirror.
Done.
Now, how does a fucking retart like you accumulate 5,000,000 Euros?
No - Arianespace does not make untrue claims to shareholders or clients.
You don't know what proof is, do you? Just making a claim that something is impossible is not proof that it is. That is all your site does. That is why everybody laughs at you.No, my findings are at http://heiwaco.com since about 1998. If you find anything wrong just copy/paste it and tell me.Your site claims that manned space flight is fake. That's wrong. Please fix it.
Thanks for visiting my website. It is correct that all manned space flights in history are fake. I think I prove it quite clearly, e.g. that these flights are at very high speeds and there are no means to brake and land. If you can show the opposite, please provide the relevant information and I will correct http://heiwaco.com .
You prove nothing, you just make unsupported claims. When asked for actual evidence you run away like a coward. Watch, I'll show you.No, my findings are at http://heiwaco.com since about 1998. If you find anything wrong just copy/paste it and tell me.Your site claims that manned space flight is fake. That's wrong. Please fix it.
Thanks for visiting my website. It is correct that all manned space flights in history are fake. I think I prove it quite clearly, e.g. that these flights are at very high speeds and there are no means to brake and land. If you can show the opposite, please provide the relevant information and I will correct http://heiwaco.com .
Have you found the lie in your statement yet? It proves you are a fraud, not that we needed more proof.?? I talk to a 1923 Nobel Prize winner physics 1964 about my future and he recommended engineering sciences for me! Later I found out he was asked to build a fake a-bomb ... and he declined. I met in Japan 1973 Japanese from Hiroshima/Japan that suggest no a-bombs hit their towns 1945. I met EM whose father EM assisted Stalin 1947-1958 to build a fake USSR atomic bomb that exploded 1959, etc, etc. EM and I watched 2001 together on TV the WTC destructions at NY. EM at once the footage was fake.You don’t have any findings of your own. All you do is repost other people’s work, add some history, and then make unfounded conclusions. There’s no unique information...nothing original.I explain everything at my website.No you don't!
All you do is repeatedly prove that because you can't understand how things are done that those things are impossible.
Maybe you should learn that,
- you are far from being the smartest cookie in the cookie barrel and
- these problems in orbital dynamics that you claim are impossible are not solved by one person on an abacus but by a group of astronomers and experts in rocketry, orbital mechanics and orbital dynamics on computers.
You you, with your proven ignorance in many of these topics have the audacity to claim that because you cannot understand it no-one can!
What an ignoramus, a real honest to goodness twerp!
No, my findings are at http://heiwaco.com since about 1998. If you find anything wrong just copy/paste it and tell me. Don't moan and groan that I am ignorant without any evidence. You sound like a twerp suffering from cognitive dissonance.
Mike
I think it is unique and original info. Just visit http://heiwaco.com for more of it.
No!No - Arianespace does not make untrue claims to shareholders or clients.
What the hell Heiwa?!! How many times do we have to go around this circle!!!!
Does Arianspace specifically claim that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t"?
Yes? or No?
You've seen and acknowledged that they made this claim in their manual. (The big red link, remember?) You are either very forgetful or you are lying. Which one?No!No - Arianespace does not make untrue claims to shareholders or clients.
What the hell Heiwa?!! How many times do we have to go around this circle!!!!
Does Arianspace specifically claim that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t"?
Yes? or No?
Sorry, twerps like you have to do their own decisions!You've seen and acknowledged that they made this claim in their manual. (The big red link, remember?) You are either very forgetful or you are lying. Which one?No!No - Arianespace does not make untrue claims to shareholders or clients.
What the hell Heiwa?!! How many times do we have to go around this circle!!!!
Does Arianspace specifically claim that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t"?
Yes? or No?
Arinespace says that they have sent 5 resupply missions to the ISS. Were the resupply missions real or did Arinanespace lie to their share holders?So just to be clear:Yes - I own shares in Airbus.
- You own shares in Airbus which is major shareholder in Arianspace.
- Arianspace makes untrue claims to its shareholders because they are being duped by NASA.
- You don't care if the company in which you own shares is gullible and possibly dishonest as long as NASA pays with money they've duped the taxpayer into paying them, and you make a profit.
Is this correct?
I know you already answered this question but your answer appeared to be internally inconsistent. Can you please explain it simply.
No - Arianespace does not make untrue claims to shareholders or clients. It just delivers satellites into orbits since many years.
Sorry, Arianespace Manual either makes the claim or it doesn't. You know very well that it does, since you read and acknowledged that it says so in their own manual.Sorry, twerps like you have to do their own decisions!You've seen and acknowledged that they made this claim in their manual. (The big red link, remember?) You are either very forgetful or you are lying. Which one?No!No - Arianespace does not make untrue claims to shareholders or clients.
What the hell Heiwa?!! How many times do we have to go around this circle!!!!
Does Arianspace specifically claim that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t"?
Yes? or No?
My understanding is that Arianespace only brings satellites into orbits. Of course Arianespace has also brought four ATVs into orbits for ESA but if they ever docked with the ISS is another story.Sorry, Arianespace Manual either makes the claim or it doesn't. You know very well that it does, since you read and acknowledged that it says so in their own manual.Sorry, twerps like you have to do their own decisions!You've seen and acknowledged that they made this claim in their manual. (The big red link, remember?) You are either very forgetful or you are lying. Which one?No!No - Arianespace does not make untrue claims to shareholders or clients.
What the hell Heiwa?!! How many times do we have to go around this circle!!!!
Does Arianspace specifically claim that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t"?
Yes? or No?
This has nothing to do with whether or not I'm a twerp or what I've decided.
Why do you acknowledge Arianspace made the claims but then declare that they did not make the claims?
Are you sure you're thinking straight?
PS. I will post the conversation in a very simple format that will make you look very stupid if you don't starttalkingcommunicating like a grown-up!
My understanding is that Arianespace only brings satellites into orbitsSorry, Arianespace Manual either makes the claim or it doesn't. You know very well that it does, since you read and acknowledged that it says so in their own manual.Sorry, twerps like you have to do their own decisions!You've seen and acknowledged that they made this claim in their manual. (The big red link, remember?) You are either very forgetful or you are lying. Which one?No!No - Arianespace does not make untrue claims to shareholders or clients.
What the hell Heiwa?!! How many times do we have to go around this circle!!!!
Does Arianspace specifically claim that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t"?
Yes? or No?
This has nothing to do with whether or not I'm a twerp or what I've decided.
Why do you acknowledge Arianspace made the claims but then declare that they did not make the claims?
Are you sure you're thinking straight?
PS. I will post the conversation in a very simple format that will make you look very stupid if you don't starttalkingcommunicating like a grown-up!
So Heiwa, where did you get the name 'Heiwa' from? What does it mean to you? The only thing I could find is that it is a Japanese corporation that makes 'pachinko' machines (an arcade/gambling machine)
Taking another sipI am not calling everyone a twerp. A spade is a spade and a twerp is a twerp, i.e. a contemptible person and a silly fool. And me hostile? I am very friendly at my website http://heiwaco.com . Please do not invent things about me.
(https://media3.giphy.com/media/AxYi67iLFI0E0/200_s.gif)
What is peaceful about calling everyone a twerp? You are one of the most hostile people on this forum!
My understanding is that Arianespace only brings satellites into orbitsSorry, Arianespace Manual either makes the claim or it doesn't. You know very well that it does, since you read and acknowledged that it says so in their own manual.Sorry, twerps like you have to do their own decisions!You've seen and acknowledged that they made this claim in their manual. (The big red link, remember?) You are either very forgetful or you are lying. Which one?No!No - Arianespace does not make untrue claims to shareholders or clients.
What the hell Heiwa?!! How many times do we have to go around this circle!!!!
Does Arianspace specifically claim that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t"?
Yes? or No?
This has nothing to do with whether or not I'm a twerp or what I've decided.
Why do you acknowledge Arianspace made the claims but then declare that they did not make the claims?
Are you sure you're thinking straight?
PS. I will post the conversation in a very simple format that will make you look very stupid if you don't starttalkingcommunicating like a grown-up!
You demand people be polite and civil to you and yet you refuse to do the same. Why is that?Taking another sipI am not calling everyone a twerp. A spade is a spade and a twerp is a twerp, i.e. a contemptible person and a silly fool. And me hostile? I am very friendly at my website http://heiwaco.com . Please do not invent things about me.
(https://media3.giphy.com/media/AxYi67iLFI0E0/200_s.gif)
What is peaceful about calling everyone a twerp? You are one of the most hostile people on this forum!
No, I demand nothing of people and I do not refuse anyone anything at my website http://heiwaco.com . Why do you suggest otherwise?You demand people be polite and civil to you and yet you refuse to do the same. Why is that?Taking another sipI am not calling everyone a twerp. A spade is a spade and a twerp is a twerp, i.e. a contemptible person and a silly fool. And me hostile? I am very friendly at my website http://heiwaco.com . Please do not invent things about me.
(https://media3.giphy.com/media/AxYi67iLFI0E0/200_s.gif)
What is peaceful about calling everyone a twerp? You are one of the most hostile people on this forum!
Mike
My understanding is that Arianespace only brings satellites into orbitsSorry, Arianespace Manual either makes the claim or it doesn't. You know very well that it does, since you read and acknowledged that it says so in their own manual.Sorry, twerps like you have to do their own decisions!You've seen and acknowledged that they made this claim in their manual. (The big red link, remember?) You are either very forgetful or you are lying. Which one?No!No - Arianespace does not make untrue claims to shareholders or clients.
What the hell Heiwa?!! How many times do we have to go around this circle!!!!
Does Arianspace specifically claim that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t"?
Yes? or No?
This has nothing to do with whether or not I'm a twerp or what I've decided.
Why do you acknowledge Arianspace made the claims but then declare that they did not make the claims?
Are you sure you're thinking straight?
PS. I will post the conversation in a very simple format that will make you look very stupid if you don't starttalkingcommunicating like a grown-up!
I don’t suggest anything. I’m flat out saying that in many posts you have told people on to be polite and civil. The following are post where you have told others to be civil and/or polite. Yet, in nearly every post you engage in personal attacks. Not only is that further proof that you are a liar but also a hypocrite.No, I demand nothing of people and I do not refuse anyone anything at my website http://heiwaco.com . Why do you suggest otherwise?You demand people be polite and civil to you and yet you refuse to do the same. Why is that?Taking another sipI am not calling everyone a twerp. A spade is a spade and a twerp is a twerp, i.e. a contemptible person and a silly fool. And me hostile? I am very friendly at my website http://heiwaco.com . Please do not invent things about me.
(https://media3.giphy.com/media/AxYi67iLFI0E0/200_s.gif)
What is peaceful about calling everyone a twerp? You are one of the most hostile people on this forum!
Mike
<snip>
Comments are always welcome. But try to be civil and polite.
<snip>
Please note that it helps to be polite, factual and on topic when you post here. This is a friendly discussion forum where people with different opinions meet and exchange ideas. I know that my ideas are not politically correct, particularly not in the USA, so I am very happy not being there.
Good that you, like me, have watched the ISS flying past like a very bright spot in the sky at/after sunset lit up by the Sun - speed >7 kms/s. I have also taken photos of it and tried to observe it in a telescope. To me it looks like a silver balloon. Feel free to question my observations. But try to be polite using civil language.
<snip>
<snip> Try to be polite.
Yes, you are right I remind people to be polite. But the twerps? They just continue to be obnoxious and rude. I cannot do anything about them.I don’t suggest anything. I’m flat out saying that in many posts you have told people on to be polite and civil. The following are post where you have told others to be civil and/or polite. Yet, in nearly every post you engage in personal attacks. Not only is that further proof that you are a liar but also a hypocrite.No, I demand nothing of people and I do not refuse anyone anything at my website http://heiwaco.com . Why do you suggest otherwise?You demand people be polite and civil to you and yet you refuse to do the same. Why is that?Taking another sipI am not calling everyone a twerp. A spade is a spade and a twerp is a twerp, i.e. a contemptible person and a silly fool. And me hostile? I am very friendly at my website http://heiwaco.com . Please do not invent things about me.
(https://media3.giphy.com/media/AxYi67iLFI0E0/200_s.gif)
What is peaceful about calling everyone a twerp? You are one of the most hostile people on this forum!
Mike<snip>
Comments are always welcome. But try to be civil and polite.<snip>
Please note that it helps to be polite, factual and on topic when you post here. This is a friendly discussion forum where people with different opinions meet and exchange ideas. I know that my ideas are not politically correct, particularly not in the USA, so I am very happy not being there.Good that you, like me, have watched the ISS flying past like a very bright spot in the sky at/after sunset lit up by the Sun - speed >7 kms/s. I have also taken photos of it and tried to observe it in a telescope. To me it looks like a silver balloon. Feel free to question my observations. But try to be polite using civil language.
<snip><snip> Try to be polite.
Do you admit you lied about speaking to the 1923 Nobel prize winner for physics in 1964? Why are you such a coward that you run away from your own words?Yes, you are right I remind people to be polite. But the twerps? They just continue to be obnoxious and rude. I cannot do anything about them.I don’t suggest anything. I’m flat out saying that in many posts you have told people on to be polite and civil. The following are post where you have told others to be civil and/or polite. Yet, in nearly every post you engage in personal attacks. Not only is that further proof that you are a liar but also a hypocrite.No, I demand nothing of people and I do not refuse anyone anything at my website http://heiwaco.com . Why do you suggest otherwise?You demand people be polite and civil to you and yet you refuse to do the same. Why is that?Taking another sipI am not calling everyone a twerp. A spade is a spade and a twerp is a twerp, i.e. a contemptible person and a silly fool. And me hostile? I am very friendly at my website http://heiwaco.com . Please do not invent things about me.
(https://media3.giphy.com/media/AxYi67iLFI0E0/200_s.gif)
What is peaceful about calling everyone a twerp? You are one of the most hostile people on this forum!
Mike<snip>
Comments are always welcome. But try to be civil and polite.<snip>
Please note that it helps to be polite, factual and on topic when you post here. This is a friendly discussion forum where people with different opinions meet and exchange ideas. I know that my ideas are not politically correct, particularly not in the USA, so I am very happy not being there.Good that you, like me, have watched the ISS flying past like a very bright spot in the sky at/after sunset lit up by the Sun - speed >7 kms/s. I have also taken photos of it and tried to observe it in a telescope. To me it looks like a silver balloon. Feel free to question my observations. But try to be polite using civil language.
<snip><snip> Try to be polite.
No, I spoke to Manne Siegbahn many times in the 1960's and I knew he was a physics Nobel Prize winner. Maybe I mixed up the year 1923 with 1924 or 1924 with 1923, when he got the prize - I wasn't born then. Why do you get so upset about it? Do you suffer from cognitive dissonance? Do you know what it is? Please visit an MD to assist you , if you can afford it.Do you admit you lied about speaking to the 1923 Nobel prize winner for physics in 1964? Why are you such a coward that you run away from your own words?Yes, you are right I remind people to be polite. But the twerps? They just continue to be obnoxious and rude. I cannot do anything about them.I don’t suggest anything. I’m flat out saying that in many posts you have told people on to be polite and civil. The following are post where you have told others to be civil and/or polite. Yet, in nearly every post you engage in personal attacks. Not only is that further proof that you are a liar but also a hypocrite.No, I demand nothing of people and I do not refuse anyone anything at my website http://heiwaco.com . Why do you suggest otherwise?You demand people be polite and civil to you and yet you refuse to do the same. Why is that?Taking another sipI am not calling everyone a twerp. A spade is a spade and a twerp is a twerp, i.e. a contemptible person and a silly fool. And me hostile? I am very friendly at my website http://heiwaco.com . Please do not invent things about me.
(https://media3.giphy.com/media/AxYi67iLFI0E0/200_s.gif)
What is peaceful about calling everyone a twerp? You are one of the most hostile people on this forum!
Mike<snip>
Comments are always welcome. But try to be civil and polite.<snip>
Please note that it helps to be polite, factual and on topic when you post here. This is a friendly discussion forum where people with different opinions meet and exchange ideas. I know that my ideas are not politically correct, particularly not in the USA, so I am very happy not being there.Good that you, like me, have watched the ISS flying past like a very bright spot in the sky at/after sunset lit up by the Sun - speed >7 kms/s. I have also taken photos of it and tried to observe it in a telescope. To me it looks like a silver balloon. Feel free to question my observations. But try to be polite using civil language.
<snip><snip> Try to be polite.
So, being civil and polite is for everyone else and doesn't apply to you? Okay, got it.Yes, you are right I remind people to be polite. But the twerps? They just continue to be obnoxious and rude. I cannot do anything about them.I don’t suggest anything. I’m flat out saying that in many posts you have told people on to be polite and civil. The following are post where you have told others to be civil and/or polite. Yet, in nearly every post you engage in personal attacks. Not only is that further proof that you are a liar but also a hypocrite.No, I demand nothing of people and I do not refuse anyone anything at my website http://heiwaco.com . Why do you suggest otherwise?You demand people be polite and civil to you and yet you refuse to do the same. Why is that?Taking another sipI am not calling everyone a twerp. A spade is a spade and a twerp is a twerp, i.e. a contemptible person and a silly fool. And me hostile? I am very friendly at my website http://heiwaco.com . Please do not invent things about me.
(https://media3.giphy.com/media/AxYi67iLFI0E0/200_s.gif)
What is peaceful about calling everyone a twerp? You are one of the most hostile people on this forum!
Mike<snip>
Comments are always welcome. But try to be civil and polite.<snip>
Please note that it helps to be polite, factual and on topic when you post here. This is a friendly discussion forum where people with different opinions meet and exchange ideas. I know that my ideas are not politically correct, particularly not in the USA, so I am very happy not being there.Good that you, like me, have watched the ISS flying past like a very bright spot in the sky at/after sunset lit up by the Sun - speed >7 kms/s. I have also taken photos of it and tried to observe it in a telescope. To me it looks like a silver balloon. Feel free to question my observations. But try to be polite using civil language.
<snip><snip> Try to be polite.
You need to look up cognitive dissonance because you don't know what it means. I know this because you aren't applying it correctly...which is understandable because you're not qualified to determine when someone is suffering from it. Stop making claims/judgments for things you nothing about.No, I spoke to Manne Siegbahn many times in the 1960's and I knew he was a physics Nobel Prize winner. Maybe I mixed up the year 1923 with 1924 or 1924 with 1923, when he got the prize - I wasn't born then. Why do you get so upset about it? Do you suffer from cognitive dissonance? Do you know what it is? Please visit an MD to assist you , if you can afford it.Do you admit you lied about speaking to the 1923 Nobel prize winner for physics in 1964? Why are you such a coward that you run away from your own words?Yes, you are right I remind people to be polite. But the twerps? They just continue to be obnoxious and rude. I cannot do anything about them.I don’t suggest anything. I’m flat out saying that in many posts you have told people on to be polite and civil. The following are post where you have told others to be civil and/or polite. Yet, in nearly every post you engage in personal attacks. Not only is that further proof that you are a liar but also a hypocrite.No, I demand nothing of people and I do not refuse anyone anything at my website http://heiwaco.com . Why do you suggest otherwise?You demand people be polite and civil to you and yet you refuse to do the same. Why is that?Taking another sipI am not calling everyone a twerp. A spade is a spade and a twerp is a twerp, i.e. a contemptible person and a silly fool. And me hostile? I am very friendly at my website http://heiwaco.com . Please do not invent things about me.
(https://media3.giphy.com/media/AxYi67iLFI0E0/200_s.gif)
What is peaceful about calling everyone a twerp? You are one of the most hostile people on this forum!
Mike<snip>
Comments are always welcome. But try to be civil and polite.<snip>
Please note that it helps to be polite, factual and on topic when you post here. This is a friendly discussion forum where people with different opinions meet and exchange ideas. I know that my ideas are not politically correct, particularly not in the USA, so I am very happy not being there.Good that you, like me, have watched the ISS flying past like a very bright spot in the sky at/after sunset lit up by the Sun - speed >7 kms/s. I have also taken photos of it and tried to observe it in a telescope. To me it looks like a silver balloon. Feel free to question my observations. But try to be polite using civil language.
<snip><snip> Try to be polite.
To be perfectly frank, you sound like being mentally retarded and/or sick. Or crazy.
What do you think, if you think?
No, I spoke to Manne Siegbahn many times in the 1960's and I knew he was a physics Nobel Prize winner. Maybe I mixed up the year 1923 with 1924 or 1924 with 1923, when he got the prize - I wasn't born then. Why do you get so upset about it? Do you suffer from cognitive dissonance? Do you know what it is? Please visit an MD to assist you , if you can afford it.Do you admit you lied about speaking to the 1923 Nobel prize winner for physics in 1964? Why are you such a coward that you run away from your own words?Yes, you are right I remind people to be polite. But the twerps? They just continue to be obnoxious and rude. I cannot do anything about them.I don’t suggest anything. I’m flat out saying that in many posts you have told people on to be polite and civil. The following are post where you have told others to be civil and/or polite. Yet, in nearly every post you engage in personal attacks. Not only is that further proof that you are a liar but also a hypocrite.No, I demand nothing of people and I do not refuse anyone anything at my website http://heiwaco.com . Why do you suggest otherwise?You demand people be polite and civil to you and yet you refuse to do the same. Why is that?Taking another sipI am not calling everyone a twerp. A spade is a spade and a twerp is a twerp, i.e. a contemptible person and a silly fool. And me hostile? I am very friendly at my website http://heiwaco.com . Please do not invent things about me.
(https://media3.giphy.com/media/AxYi67iLFI0E0/200_s.gif)
What is peaceful about calling everyone a twerp? You are one of the most hostile people on this forum!
Mike<snip>
Comments are always welcome. But try to be civil and polite.<snip>
Please note that it helps to be polite, factual and on topic when you post here. This is a friendly discussion forum where people with different opinions meet and exchange ideas. I know that my ideas are not politically correct, particularly not in the USA, so I am very happy not being there.Good that you, like me, have watched the ISS flying past like a very bright spot in the sky at/after sunset lit up by the Sun - speed >7 kms/s. I have also taken photos of it and tried to observe it in a telescope. To me it looks like a silver balloon. Feel free to question my observations. But try to be polite using civil language.
<snip><snip> Try to be polite.
To be perfectly frank, you sound like being mentally retarded and/or sick. Or crazy.
What do you think, if you think?
My understanding is that Arianespace only brings satellites into orbitsSorry, Arianespace Manual either makes the claim or it doesn't. You know very well that it does, since you read and acknowledged that it says so in their own manual.Sorry, twerps like you have to do their own decisions!You've seen and acknowledged that they made this claim in their manual. (The big red link, remember?) You are either very forgetful or you are lying. Which one?No!No - Arianespace does not make untrue claims to shareholders or clients.
What the hell Heiwa?!! How many times do we have to go around this circle!!!!
Does Arianspace specifically claim that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t"?
Yes? or No?
This has nothing to do with whether or not I'm a twerp or what I've decided.
Why do you acknowledge Arianspace made the claims but then declare that they did not make the claims?
Are you sure you're thinking straight?
PS. I will post the conversation in a very simple format that will make you look very stupid if you don't starttalkingcommunicating like a grown-up!
Well, if Arianespace says that it can send a spacecraft into orbit that later docks with the ISS in its orbit at ~400 km altiude and that it delivers 19 or 21 t cargo there, and, in addition, that this spacecraft later re-enters and lands on earth, I would suggest that Arianespace is lying.My understanding is that Arianespace only brings satellites into orbitsSorry, Arianespace Manual either makes the claim or it doesn't. You know very well that it does, since you read and acknowledged that it says so in their own manual.Sorry, twerps like you have to do their own decisions!You've seen and acknowledged that they made this claim in their manual. (The big red link, remember?) You are either very forgetful or you are lying. Which one?No!No - Arianespace does not make untrue claims to shareholders or clients.
What the hell Heiwa?!! How many times do we have to go around this circle!!!!
Does Arianspace specifically claim that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t"?
Yes? or No?
This has nothing to do with whether or not I'm a twerp or what I've decided.
Why do you acknowledge Arianspace made the claims but then declare that they did not make the claims?
Are you sure you're thinking straight?
PS. I will post the conversation in a very simple format that will make you look very stupid if you don't starttalkingcommunicating like a grown-up!
What is your understanding regarding this claim made by Arianspace (Section 2.4.5 Manual):
Arianspace specifically claims that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t".
Alright.What is your understanding regarding this claim made by Arianspace (Section 2.4.5 Manual):Well, if Arianespace says that it can send a spacecraft into orbit that later docks with the ISS in its orbit at ~400 km altiude and that it delivers 19 or 21 t cargo there, and, in addition, that this spacecraft later re-enters and lands on earth, I would suggest that Arianespace is lying.
Arianspace specifically claims that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t".
Alright.What is your understanding regarding this claim made by Arianspace (Section 2.4.5 Manual):Well, if Arianespace says that it can send a spacecraft into orbit that later docks with the ISS in its orbit at ~400 km altiude and that it delivers 19 or 21 t cargo there, and, in addition, that this spacecraft later re-enters and lands on earth, I would suggest that Arianespace is lying.
Arianspace specifically claims that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t".
So then, how do you feel about being a shareholder in a company that makes claims which are untrue, believes NASA, believes in the ISS, and is too stupid to realize the whole thing is an elaborate hoax?
Well, if Arianespace says that it can send a spacecraft into orbit that later docks with the ISS in its orbit at ~400 km altiude and that it delivers 19 or 21 t cargo there, and, in addition, that this spacecraft later re-enters and lands on earth, I would suggest that Arianespace is lying.You do understand that it's against the law for a publicly traded company to lie to their shareholders, don't you? If Arinespace lied to their shareholders (including you) about sending resupply missions to the ISS, then they broke the law.
Yes, I assume it is illegal to lie to shareholders ... but Arianespace is not a public company. It is owned by particular interests of the space industry, incl. parties that say they can send humans into space and bring them back or that they can land on asteroids, etc.Well, if Arianespace says that it can send a spacecraft into orbit that later docks with the ISS in its orbit at ~400 km altiude and that it delivers 19 or 21 t cargo there, and, in addition, that this spacecraft later re-enters and lands on earth, I would suggest that Arianespace is lying.You do understand that it's against the law for a publicly traded company to lie to their shareholders, don't you? If Arinespace lied to their shareholders (including you) about sending resupply missions to the ISS, then they broke the law.
What is the dry mass of this mysterious spacecraft?
Yes, and total mass is dry mass plus fluids. But Arianespace cannot get it off the ground.
What is the dry mass of this mysterious spacecraft?
Total mass minus fluids.
Where is your evidence of this? Or is this just another demonstration of your ignorance? Just another failure. Like how you have failed to prove your challenge is valid by publicly showing you have the money.Yes, and total mass is dry mass plus fluids. But Arianespace cannot get it off the ground.
What is the dry mass of this mysterious spacecraft?
Total mass minus fluids.
What is the dry mass of this mysterious spacecraft?
Total mass minus fluids.
Yes, and total mass is dry mass plus fluids. But Arianespace cannot get it off the ground.
I think this causes him to have a feeling of solidarity with the company,
I only just realised the significance of this statement: "Well, if Arianespace says that it can send a spacecraft into orbit that later docks with the ISS in its orbit at ~400 km altiude and that it delivers 19 or 21 t cargo there, and, in addition, that this spacecraft later re-enters and lands on earth".What is your understanding regarding this claim made by Arianspace (Section 2.4.5 Manual):Well, if Arianespace says that it can send a spacecraft into orbit that later docks with the ISS in its orbit at ~400 km altiude and that it delivers 19 or 21 t cargo there, and, in addition, that this spacecraft later re-enters and lands on earth, I would suggest that Arianespace is lying.
Arianspace specifically claims that they "can serve the International Space Station" and that "the performance varies between 19 and 21 t".
Extracts from Ariane 5 User’s Manual Issue 5 Revision 2Quote from: Arianespace, Roland LAGIER, Senior Vice president Chief technical officerPerformance and launch missionSo note that Arianespace themselves claim that the Ariane 5/ECA can send:
2.4. General performance data
2.4.5. International Space Station orbit
Ariane 5 equipped with a storable propellant upper stage in the ES version can serve the
International Space Station with the Automated Transfer Vehicle, on a Low Earth Circular
orbit:The performance varies between 19 and 21 t, depending on the specific mission.
- altitude range between 200 and 400 km
- inclination = 51.6 deg
From: Ariane5_Users-Manual_October2016.pdf (http://www.arianespace.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Ariane5_Users-Manual_October2016.pdf)
- 19 to 21 tonnes for re-fuelling the International Space Station with the Automated Transfer Vehicle, on a Low Earth Circular orbit,
What is the dry mass of this mysterious spacecraft?There is no mysterious spacecraft! What on earth are you raving on about?
And how is the docking done? Fully automatic by remote control? Haven't I heard it before. Just pseudo scientific lies!Go and chase it up yourself you lazy so-and-so, you're supposedly the space mission expert around here!
Docking To ISS Of The ESA Automated Transfer Vehicle 4 "Albert Einstein" ATV 4, Matthew Travis | Tour of ATV-3 from the International Space Station European Space Agency, ESA | ATV-1 reentry European Space Agency, ESA |
Go and chase it up yourself you lazy so-and-so, you're supposedly the space mission expert around here!
But, if it was by "remote control" it would hardly be "fully automatic" would it? But here take a peak, it's a bit boring though!There, that will make you happy, the ATSs just burn up on re-entry!
Docking To ISS Of The ESA Automated Transfer Vehicle 4
"Albert Einstein" ATV 4, Matthew Travis
Tour of ATV-3 from the International Space Station
European Space Agency, ESA
ATV-1 reentry
European Space Agency, ESA
You've been proven wrong so many times that only a twerp would take the slightest notice of anything you say.
Thanks for three videos about the ATV. They are just Hollywood standard photo shop fakes. They prove nothing or rather they show that everything is just magic.
Anyway, it should be clear that Arianespace has nothing to do with the docking of an ATV with the ISS or the return and re-entry. They are all NASA/ESA nonsense.
Extracts from Ariane 5 User’s Manual Issue 5 Revision 2Quote from: Arianespace, Roland LAGIER, Senior Vice president Chief technical officerPerformance and launch mission
2.4. General performance data
2.4.5. International Space Station orbit
Ariane 5 equipped with a storable propellant upper stage in the ES version can serve the
International Space Station with the Automated Transfer Vehicle, on a Low Earth Circular
orbit:The performance varies between 19 and 21 t, depending on the specific mission.
- altitude range between 200 and 400 km
- inclination = 51.6 deg
From: Ariane5_Users-Manual_October2016.pdf (http://www.arianespace.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Ariane5_Users-Manual_October2016.pdf)
They are just Hollywood standard photo shop fakes. They prove nothing or rather they show that everything is just magic.
If only you had some evidence to support this claim. Of course you don't or you would post it here. You are just a liar and a fraud and a failure.
Go and chase it up yourself you lazy so-and-so, you're supposedly the space mission expert around here!
But, if it was by "remote control" it would hardly be "fully automatic" would it? But here take a peak, it's a bit boring though!There, that will make you happy, the ATSs just burn up on re-entry!
Docking To ISS Of The ESA Automated Transfer Vehicle 4
"Albert Einstein" ATV 4, Matthew Travis
Tour of ATV-3 from the International Space Station
European Space Agency, ESA
ATV-1 reentry
European Space Agency, ESA
Thanks for three videos about the ATV. They are just Hollywood standard photo shop fakes. They prove nothing or rather they show that everything is just magic.
Anyway, it should be clear that Arianespace has nothing to do with the docking of an ATV with the ISS or the return and re-entry. They are all NASA/ESA nonsense.
No, only twerps believe in ATVs. That's why they are twerps.If only you had some evidence to support this claim. Of course you don't or you would post it here. You are just a liar and a fraud and a failure.
Go and chase it up yourself you lazy so-and-so, you're supposedly the space mission expert around here!
But, if it was by "remote control" it would hardly be "fully automatic" would it? But here take a peak, it's a bit boring though!There, that will make you happy, the ATSs just burn up on re-entry!
Docking To ISS Of The ESA Automated Transfer Vehicle 4
"Albert Einstein" ATV 4, Matthew Travis
Tour of ATV-3 from the International Space Station
European Space Agency, ESA
ATV-1 reentry
European Space Agency, ESA
Thanks for three videos about the ATV. They are just Hollywood standard photo shop fakes. They prove nothing or rather they show that everything is just magic.
Anyway, it should be clear that Arianespace has nothing to do with the docking of an ATV with the ISS or the return and re-entry. They are all NASA/ESA nonsense.
So that would be a no, you don't have any evidence. Just your own admission that you are too stupid to understand the subject. Same as always, you fail again.No, only twerps believe in ATVs. That's why they are twerps.If only you had some evidence to support this claim. Of course you don't or you would post it here. You are just a liar and a fraud and a failure.
Go and chase it up yourself you lazy so-and-so, you're supposedly the space mission expert around here!
But, if it was by "remote control" it would hardly be "fully automatic" would it? But here take a peak, it's a bit boring though!There, that will make you happy, the ATSs just burn up on re-entry!
Docking To ISS Of The ESA Automated Transfer Vehicle 4
"Albert Einstein" ATV 4, Matthew Travis
Tour of ATV-3 from the International Space Station
European Space Agency, ESA
ATV-1 reentry
European Space Agency, ESA
Thanks for three videos about the ATV. They are just Hollywood standard photo shop fakes. They prove nothing or rather they show that everything is just magic.
Anyway, it should be clear that Arianespace has nothing to do with the docking of an ATV with the ISS or the return and re-entry. They are all NASA/ESA nonsense.
Prove it!Yes, and total mass is dry mass plus fluids. But Arianespace cannot get it off the ground.
What is the dry mass of this mysterious spacecraft?
Total mass minus fluids.
But Arianespace cannot get it off the ground.
No, only twerps think so. That's why they are twerps.But Arianespace cannot get it off the ground.
Just like you?
No, only twerps think so. That's why they are twerps.But Arianespace cannot get it off the ground.
Just like you?
Arianespace cannot get what off the ground? Why do you just make up fiction to support you own agenda?Yes, and total mass is dry mass plus fluids. But Arianespace cannot get it off the ground.
What is the dry mass of this mysterious spacecraft?
Total mass minus fluids.
Anyway, it should be clear that Arianespace has nothing to do with the docking of an ATV with the ISS or the return and re-entry. They are all NASA/ESA nonsense.You've been proven wrong so many times that only a twerp would take the slightest notice of anything you say.
Extracts from Ariane 5 User’s Manual Issue 5 Revision 2Quote from: Arianespace, Roland LAGIER, Senior Vice president Chief technical officerPerformance and launch mission
2.4. General performance data
2.4.5. International Space Station orbit
Ariane 5 equipped with a storable propellant upper stage in the ES version can serve the
International Space Station with the Automated Transfer Vehicle, on a Low Earth Circular
orbit:The performance varies between 19 and 21 t, depending on the specific mission.
- altitude range between 200 and 400 km
- inclination = 51.6 deg
From: Ariane5_Users-Manual_October2016.pdf (http://www.arianespace.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Ariane5_Users-Manual_October2016.pdf)
Neither - Arianespace says it can put 20 tons in LEO and 10 tons in GTO - http://www.arianespace.com/vehicle/ariane-5/ - but has never done it.Arianespace cannot get what off the ground? Why do you just make up fiction to support you own agenda?Yes, and total mass is dry mass plus fluids. But Arianespace cannot get it off the ground.
What is the dry mass of this mysterious spacecraft?
Total mass minus fluids.
There is no, "mysterious spacecraft"! It's just the upper stage in the ES version of the Ariane 5! Don't you ever read the Arianespace manuals?
Read this again!Anyway, it should be clear that Arianespace has nothing to do with the docking of an ATV with the ISS or the return and re-entry. They are all NASA/ESA nonsense.You've been proven wrong so many times that only a twerp would take the slightest notice of anything you say.
But remember it is Arianespace themselves that claim:Extracts from Ariane 5 User’s Manual Issue 5 Revision 2Quote from: Arianespace, Roland LAGIER, Senior Vice president Chief technical officerPerformance and launch mission
2.4. General performance data
2.4.5. International Space Station orbit
Ariane 5 equipped with a storable propellant upper stage in the ES version can serve the
International Space Station with the Automated Transfer Vehicle, on a Low Earth Circular
orbit:The performance varies between 19 and 21 t, depending on the specific mission.
- altitude range between 200 and 400 km
- inclination = 51.6 deg
From: Ariane5_Users-Manual_October2016.pdf (http://www.arianespace.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Ariane5_Users-Manual_October2016.pdf)
Stating that, "Ariane 5 equipped with a storable propellant upper stage in the ES version can serve the International Space Station with the Automated Transfer Vehicle, on a Low Earth Circular orbit" when there is International Space Station would be very deceptive.
I'd believe Arianespace before you any day!
Either you are lying with your claim that "Arianespace cannot get it off the ground" or Arianespace is deceiving its customers.
Which is it?
So they are lying when they claim they can do that. Do you even read your own bullshit?Neither - Arianespace says it can put 20 tons in LEO and 10 tons in GTO - http://www.arianespace.com/vehicle/ariane-5/ - but has never done it.Arianespace cannot get what off the ground? Why do you just make up fiction to support you own agenda?Yes, and total mass is dry mass plus fluids. But Arianespace cannot get it off the ground.
What is the dry mass of this mysterious spacecraft?
Total mass minus fluids.
There is no, "mysterious spacecraft"! It's just the upper stage in the ES version of the Ariane 5! Don't you ever read the Arianespace manuals?
Read this again!Anyway, it should be clear that Arianespace has nothing to do with the docking of an ATV with the ISS or the return and re-entry. They are all NASA/ESA nonsense.You've been proven wrong so many times that only a twerp would take the slightest notice of anything you say.
But remember it is Arianespace themselves that claim:Extracts from Ariane 5 User’s Manual Issue 5 Revision 2Quote from: Arianespace, Roland LAGIER, Senior Vice president Chief technical officerPerformance and launch mission
2.4. General performance data
2.4.5. International Space Station orbit
Ariane 5 equipped with a storable propellant upper stage in the ES version can serve the
International Space Station with the Automated Transfer Vehicle, on a Low Earth Circular
orbit:The performance varies between 19 and 21 t, depending on the specific mission.
- altitude range between 200 and 400 km
- inclination = 51.6 deg
From: Ariane5_Users-Manual_October2016.pdf (http://www.arianespace.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Ariane5_Users-Manual_October2016.pdf)
Stating that, "Ariane 5 equipped with a storable propellant upper stage in the ES version can serve the International Space Station with the Automated Transfer Vehicle, on a Low Earth Circular orbit" when there is International Space Station would be very deceptive.
I'd believe Arianespace before you any day!
Either you are lying with your claim that "Arianespace cannot get it off the ground" or Arianespace is deceiving its customers.
Which is it?
The suggestion that Arianespace can deliver 21 tons to the (fake) ISS orbiting Earth at 400 km altitude is just SF and BS.
Haven't you understood that the ISS is just an empty shell with no humans aboard?
No! He doesn't. That's why tree gets caught lying all the time. He's told so many that even he can't keep track.So they are lying when they claim they can do that. Do you even read your own bullshit?Neither - Arianespace says it can put 20 tons in LEO and 10 tons in GTO - http://www.arianespace.com/vehicle/ariane-5/ - but has never done it.Arianespace cannot get what off the ground? Why do you just make up fiction to support you own agenda?Yes, and total mass is dry mass plus fluids. But Arianespace cannot get it off the ground.
What is the dry mass of this mysterious spacecraft?
Total mass minus fluids.
There is no, "mysterious spacecraft"! It's just the upper stage in the ES version of the Ariane 5! Don't you ever read the Arianespace manuals?
Read this again!Anyway, it should be clear that Arianespace has nothing to do with the docking of an ATV with the ISS or the return and re-entry. They are all NASA/ESA nonsense.You've been proven wrong so many times that only a twerp would take the slightest notice of anything you say.
But remember it is Arianespace themselves that claim:Extracts from Ariane 5 User’s Manual Issue 5 Revision 2Quote from: Arianespace, Roland LAGIER, Senior Vice president Chief technical officerPerformance and launch mission
2.4. General performance data
2.4.5. International Space Station orbit
Ariane 5 equipped with a storable propellant upper stage in the ES version can serve the
International Space Station with the Automated Transfer Vehicle, on a Low Earth Circular
orbit:The performance varies between 19 and 21 t, depending on the specific mission.
- altitude range between 200 and 400 km
- inclination = 51.6 deg
From: Ariane5_Users-Manual_October2016.pdf (http://www.arianespace.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Ariane5_Users-Manual_October2016.pdf)
Stating that, "Ariane 5 equipped with a storable propellant upper stage in the ES version can serve the International Space Station with the Automated Transfer Vehicle, on a Low Earth Circular orbit" when there is International Space Station would be very deceptive.
I'd believe Arianespace before you any day!
Either you are lying with your claim that "Arianespace cannot get it off the ground" or Arianespace is deceiving its customers.
Which is it?
The suggestion that Arianespace can deliver 21 tons to the (fake) ISS orbiting Earth at 400 km altitude is just SF and BS.
Haven't you understood that the ISS is just an empty shell with no humans aboard?
The suggestion that Arianespace can deliver 21 tons to the (fake) ISS orbiting Earth at 400 km altitude is just SF and BS.Haven't you understood that you are a total idiot that understands nothing about space, rockets, orbital mechanics and what Arianespace or SpaceX are capable of?
Haven't you understood that the ISS is just an empty shell with no humans aboard?
The suggestion that Arianespace can deliver 21 tons to the (fake) ISS orbiting Earth at 400 km altitude is just SF and BS.Haven't you understood that you are a total idiot that understands nothing about space, rockets, orbital mechanics and what Arianespace or SpaceX are capable of?
Haven't you understood that the ISS is just an empty shell with no humans aboard?
Stick to fixing leaky taps on leaking boats.
You sound like a twerp. At my website http://heiwaco.com I just demonstrate that dropping a small object C like the top of a structure on the big, intact bottom A of same structure (on 911 2001), bottom A stops C from crushing A into dust. In most cases C just bounces on A, etc, etc. Same with an asteroid X. If it manages to penetrate the atmosphere without burning up and collides with Earth, X bounces and/or causes local damages in contact with Earth. Earth does not become dust.The suggestion that Arianespace can deliver 21 tons to the (fake) ISS orbiting Earth at 400 km altitude is just SF and BS.Haven't you understood that you are a total idiot that understands nothing about space, rockets, orbital mechanics and what Arianespace or SpaceX are capable of?
Haven't you understood that the ISS is just an empty shell with no humans aboard?
Stick to fixing leaky taps on leaking boats.
Haven't you understood that he is not going to change his thinking on anything after your thousands of posts insisting otherwise
This is a guy who thinks a planet killing asteroid would bounce off the roof of his house
This is a guy who thinks more guttering would have prevented Texas flooding like it did a little while back
This is a guy who thinks Stephen Hawking faked his ALS
This is a guy who is laughing at you every time you converse with him
Just accept this guy is a nutcase and not worth anyones time and energy
We all know on the subject of space, rockets, orbital mechanics, nuclear weapons etc this guy knows less than nothing. We all know he is lying about his wealth, his IQ and all his claims on his stupid website. We get it.
I know you don't like me much either but just do yourself a favour and let him go. You owe him nothing
You sound like a twerp. At my website http://heiwaco.com I just demonstrate that dropping a small object C like the top of a structure on the big, intact bottom A of same structure (on 911 2001), bottom A stops C from crushing A into dust. In most cases C just bounces on A, etc, etc. Same with an asteroid X. If it manages to penetrate the atmosphere without burning up and collides with Earth, X bounces and/or causes local damages in contact with Earth. Earth does not become dust.The suggestion that Arianespace can deliver 21 tons to the (fake) ISS orbiting Earth at 400 km altitude is just SF and BS.Haven't you understood that you are a total idiot that understands nothing about space, rockets, orbital mechanics and what Arianespace or SpaceX are capable of?
Haven't you understood that the ISS is just an empty shell with no humans aboard?
Stick to fixing leaky taps on leaking boats.
Haven't you understood that he is not going to change his thinking on anything after your thousands of posts insisting otherwise
This is a guy who thinks a planet killing asteroid would bounce off the roof of his house
This is a guy who thinks more guttering would have prevented Texas flooding like it did a little while back
This is a guy who thinks Stephen Hawking faked his ALS
This is a guy who is laughing at you every time you converse with him
Just accept this guy is a nutcase and not worth anyones time and energy
We all know on the subject of space, rockets, orbital mechanics, nuclear weapons etc this guy knows less than nothing. We all know he is lying about his wealth, his IQ and all his claims on his stupid website. We get it.
I know you don't like me much either but just do yourself a favour and let him go. You owe him nothing
Re Stephen Hawkings and ALS I just suggest at my website that ALS killed in about six months my wife and all other people we got to know then getting ALS around 2001. No cure. Hawkings was the inventor of Black Holes in space and I explain at my website why Black Holes do not exist. I think Stephen discovered the Black Hole at the empty bottom of a whisky glass.
Re asstronuts visiting asteroids to blow them up before they collide with Earth, I consider such plans by NASA and ESA as SF and BS. I explain in detail why at my website.
Everything I describe at my website is true and real. It is quite popular ... except with twerps of all kind.
No, I just publish what I think at my website http://heiwaco.com and it does not include asteroids bouncing on my house. Only twerps invent such SF and BS. BTW I live in an apartment.You sound like a twerp. At my website http://heiwaco.com I just demonstrate that dropping a small object C like the top of a structure on the big, intact bottom A of same structure (on 911 2001), bottom A stops C from crushing A into dust. In most cases C just bounces on A, etc, etc. Same with an asteroid X. If it manages to penetrate the atmosphere without burning up and collides with Earth, X bounces and/or causes local damages in contact with Earth. Earth does not become dust.The suggestion that Arianespace can deliver 21 tons to the (fake) ISS orbiting Earth at 400 km altitude is just SF and BS.Haven't you understood that you are a total idiot that understands nothing about space, rockets, orbital mechanics and what Arianespace or SpaceX are capable of?
Haven't you understood that the ISS is just an empty shell with no humans aboard?
Stick to fixing leaky taps on leaking boats.
Haven't you understood that he is not going to change his thinking on anything after your thousands of posts insisting otherwise
This is a guy who thinks a planet killing asteroid would bounce off the roof of his house
This is a guy who thinks more guttering would have prevented Texas flooding like it did a little while back
This is a guy who thinks Stephen Hawking faked his ALS
This is a guy who is laughing at you every time you converse with him
Just accept this guy is a nutcase and not worth anyones time and energy
We all know on the subject of space, rockets, orbital mechanics, nuclear weapons etc this guy knows less than nothing. We all know he is lying about his wealth, his IQ and all his claims on his stupid website. We get it.
I know you don't like me much either but just do yourself a favour and let him go. You owe him nothing
Re Stephen Hawkings and ALS I just suggest at my website that ALS killed in about six months my wife and all other people we got to know then getting ALS around 2001. No cure. Hawkings was the inventor of Black Holes in space and I explain at my website why Black Holes do not exist. I think Stephen discovered the Black Hole at the empty bottom of a whisky glass.
Re asstronuts visiting asteroids to blow them up before they collide with Earth, I consider such plans by NASA and ESA as SF and BS. I explain in detail why at my website.
Everything I describe at my website is true and real. It is quite popular ... except with twerps of all kind.
A large enough asteroid could survive long enough to penetrate our atmosphere. They travel quite fast and out atmosphere is pretty thin relatively speaking. I would think several trillion tonnes of rock landing on your house would flatten it and create a large hole in the earth. You think otherwise. If you are happy to look like a stupid idiot, more power to you
No, I just publish what I think at my website http://www.ratemypoo.com and it does not include asteroids bouncing on my house. Only twerps invent such SF and BS. BTW I live in an apartment.You sound like a twerp. At my website http://heiwaco.com I just demonstrate that dropping a small object C like the top of a structure on the big, intact bottom A of same structure (on 911 2001), bottom A stops C from crushing A into dust. In most cases C just bounces on A, etc, etc. Same with an asteroid X. If it manages to penetrate the atmosphere without burning up and collides with Earth, X bounces and/or causes local damages in contact with Earth. Earth does not become dust.The suggestion that Arianespace can deliver 21 tons to the (fake) ISS orbiting Earth at 400 km altitude is just SF and BS.Haven't you understood that you are a total idiot that understands nothing about space, rockets, orbital mechanics and what Arianespace or SpaceX are capable of?
Haven't you understood that the ISS is just an empty shell with no humans aboard?
Stick to fixing leaky taps on leaking boats.
Haven't you understood that he is not going to change his thinking on anything after your thousands of posts insisting otherwise
This is a guy who thinks a planet killing asteroid would bounce off the roof of his house
This is a guy who thinks more guttering would have prevented Texas flooding like it did a little while back
This is a guy who thinks Stephen Hawking faked his ALS
This is a guy who is laughing at you every time you converse with him
Just accept this guy is a nutcase and not worth anyones time and energy
We all know on the subject of space, rockets, orbital mechanics, nuclear weapons etc this guy knows less than nothing. We all know he is lying about his wealth, his IQ and all his claims on his stupid website. We get it.
I know you don't like me much either but just do yourself a favour and let him go. You owe him nothing
Re Stephen Hawkings and ALS I just suggest at my website that ALS killed in about six months my wife and all other people we got to know then getting ALS around 2001. No cure. Hawkings was the inventor of Black Holes in space and I explain at my website why Black Holes do not exist. I think Stephen discovered the Black Hole at the empty bottom of a whisky glass.
Re asstronuts visiting asteroids to blow them up before they collide with Earth, I consider such plans by NASA and ESA as SF and BS. I explain in detail why at my website.
Everything I describe at my website is true and real. It is quite popular ... except with twerps of all kind.
A large enough asteroid could survive long enough to penetrate our atmosphere. They travel quite fast and out atmosphere is pretty thin relatively speaking. I would think several trillion tonnes of rock landing on your house would flatten it and create a large hole in the earth. You think otherwise. If you are happy to look like a stupid idiot, more power to you
Well, twerps think so and therefore I offer them €1M to prove it - http://heiwaco.com/chall.htm .No, I just publish what I think at my website http://www.ratemypoo.com and it does not include asteroids bouncing on my house. Only twerps invent such SF and BS. BTW I live in an apartment.You sound like a twerp. At my website http://heiwaco.com I just demonstrate that dropping a small object C like the top of a structure on the big, intact bottom A of same structure (on 911 2001), bottom A stops C from crushing A into dust. In most cases C just bounces on A, etc, etc. Same with an asteroid X. If it manages to penetrate the atmosphere without burning up and collides with Earth, X bounces and/or causes local damages in contact with Earth. Earth does not become dust.The suggestion that Arianespace can deliver 21 tons to the (fake) ISS orbiting Earth at 400 km altitude is just SF and BS.Haven't you understood that you are a total idiot that understands nothing about space, rockets, orbital mechanics and what Arianespace or SpaceX are capable of?
Haven't you understood that the ISS is just an empty shell with no humans aboard?
Stick to fixing leaky taps on leaking boats.
Haven't you understood that he is not going to change his thinking on anything after your thousands of posts insisting otherwise
This is a guy who thinks a planet killing asteroid would bounce off the roof of his house
This is a guy who thinks more guttering would have prevented Texas flooding like it did a little while back
This is a guy who thinks Stephen Hawking faked his ALS
This is a guy who is laughing at you every time you converse with him
Just accept this guy is a nutcase and not worth anyones time and energy
We all know on the subject of space, rockets, orbital mechanics, nuclear weapons etc this guy knows less than nothing. We all know he is lying about his wealth, his IQ and all his claims on his stupid website. We get it.
I know you don't like me much either but just do yourself a favour and let him go. You owe him nothing
Re Stephen Hawkings and ALS I just suggest at my website that ALS killed in about six months my wife and all other people we got to know then getting ALS around 2001. No cure. Hawkings was the inventor of Black Holes in space and I explain at my website why Black Holes do not exist. I think Stephen discovered the Black Hole at the empty bottom of a whisky glass.
Re asstronuts visiting asteroids to blow them up before they collide with Earth, I consider such plans by NASA and ESA as SF and BS. I explain in detail why at my website.
Everything I describe at my website is true and real. It is quite popular ... except with twerps of all kind.
A large enough asteroid could survive long enough to penetrate our atmosphere. They travel quite fast and out atmosphere is pretty thin relatively speaking. I would think several trillion tonnes of rock landing on your house would flatten it and create a large hole in the earth. You think otherwise. If you are happy to look like a stupid idiot, more power to you
What you think in the majority of cases does not correspond with reality.
Well, twerps think so and therefore I offer them €1M to prove it - http://www.ratemypoo.com
Only twerps spam shit on this forum.Well, twerps think so and therefore I offer them €1M to prove it - http://www.ratemypoo.com
I see nothing on your site but shit. It's disgusting and you should stop spamming it
Well, twerps think so and therefore I offer them €1M to prove it - http://www.ratemypoo.com
I see nothing on your site but shit. It's disgusting and you should stop spamming it
Well, twerps think so and therefore I offer them €1M to prove it - http://www.ratemypoo.com
I see nothing on your site but shit. It's disgusting and you should stop spamming it
Well, the proper link is http://www.ratemypoo.com with nice, proper, fresh shit of all sorts. I am quite proud of it. It took me 20+ years to put it together.
But twerps get upset about it.
You lied about your money so nobody believes you have a spare €5 million lying around to pay off all those challenges.Well, twerps think so and therefore I offer them €1M to prove it - http://heiwaco.com/chall.htm .No, I just publish what I think at my website http://www.ratemypoo.com and it does not include asteroids bouncing on my house. Only twerps invent such SF and BS. BTW I live in an apartment.You sound like a twerp. At my website http://heiwaco.com I just demonstrate that dropping a small object C like the top of a structure on the big, intact bottom A of same structure (on 911 2001), bottom A stops C from crushing A into dust. In most cases C just bounces on A, etc, etc. Same with an asteroid X. If it manages to penetrate the atmosphere without burning up and collides with Earth, X bounces and/or causes local damages in contact with Earth. Earth does not become dust.The suggestion that Arianespace can deliver 21 tons to the (fake) ISS orbiting Earth at 400 km altitude is just SF and BS.Haven't you understood that you are a total idiot that understands nothing about space, rockets, orbital mechanics and what Arianespace or SpaceX are capable of?
Haven't you understood that the ISS is just an empty shell with no humans aboard?
Stick to fixing leaky taps on leaking boats.
Haven't you understood that he is not going to change his thinking on anything after your thousands of posts insisting otherwise
This is a guy who thinks a planet killing asteroid would bounce off the roof of his house
This is a guy who thinks more guttering would have prevented Texas flooding like it did a little while back
This is a guy who thinks Stephen Hawking faked his ALS
This is a guy who is laughing at you every time you converse with him
Just accept this guy is a nutcase and not worth anyones time and energy
We all know on the subject of space, rockets, orbital mechanics, nuclear weapons etc this guy knows less than nothing. We all know he is lying about his wealth, his IQ and all his claims on his stupid website. We get it.
I know you don't like me much either but just do yourself a favour and let him go. You owe him nothing
Re Stephen Hawkings and ALS I just suggest at my website that ALS killed in about six months my wife and all other people we got to know then getting ALS around 2001. No cure. Hawkings was the inventor of Black Holes in space and I explain at my website why Black Holes do not exist. I think Stephen discovered the Black Hole at the empty bottom of a whisky glass.
Re asstronuts visiting asteroids to blow them up before they collide with Earth, I consider such plans by NASA and ESA as SF and BS. I explain in detail why at my website.
Everything I describe at my website is true and real. It is quite popular ... except with twerps of all kind.
A large enough asteroid could survive long enough to penetrate our atmosphere. They travel quite fast and out atmosphere is pretty thin relatively speaking. I would think several trillion tonnes of rock landing on your house would flatten it and create a large hole in the earth. You think otherwise. If you are happy to look like a stupid idiot, more power to you
What you think in the majority of cases does not correspond with reality.
No, I just publish what I think at my website...Just because you think something, that doesn't make it true.
Well, before I publish anything at my website, I check it several times that it is correct.No, I just publish what I think at my website...Just because you think something, that doesn't make it true.
That's a lie. You have admitted several times about how shoddy your research is. Basically you don't do any. You offer no evidence on your site, just you claiming things are impossible.Well, before I publish anything at my website, I check it several times that it is correct.No, I just publish what I think at my website...Just because you think something, that doesn't make it true.
You don't expect me to publish Fake News or similar.
Examples:
1. Atomic bombs
USA informed August 1945 that it had destroyed two Japanese towns using atomic bombs and killed 100 000's of people. My findings are that the US atomic bombs were (and are) Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm
2. Manned space travel
USA has informed during the 1960's that it has sent Americans orbiting Earth and visited the Moon. My findings are that no Americans were in space at all and that info to the contrary was (and is) Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
3. 911
USA informed September 2001 that Arabs had destroyed the World Trade Center at NY by flying planes into tops of skyscrapers. My findings are that no tops C of any structure cannot crush the intact bottom A into dust by gravity so Arabs doing it is Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/nist.htm
I know that particular interests do not like my findings but it is not my problem. I work for improved safety at sea.
All you have are unfounded claims. There are literally millions of people you could have interviewed but you didn't.Well, before I publish anything at my website, I check it several times that it is correct.No, I just publish what I think at my website...Just because you think something, that doesn't make it true.
You don't expect me to publish Fake News or similar.
Examples:
1. Atomic bombs
USA informed August 1945 that it had destroyed two Japanese towns using atomic bombs and killed 100 000's of people. My findings are that the US atomic bombs were (and are) Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm
2. Manned space travel
USA has informed during the 1960's that it has sent Americans orbiting Earth and visited the Moon. My findings are that no Americans were in space at all and that info to the contrary was (and is) Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
3. 911
USA informed September 2001 that Arabs had destroyed the World Trade Center at NY by flying planes into tops of skyscrapers. My findings are that no tops C of any structure cannot crush the intact bottom A into dust by gravity so Arabs doing it is Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/nist.htm
I know that particular interests do not like my findings but it is not my problem. I work for improved safety at sea.
Even worse, your lack of understanding of basic engineering concepts is amazingThis is especially true. The guy can barely do high school physics.
Actually, I do expect you to publish Fake News because that's exactly what you have been doing for many years now.Well, before I publish anything at my website, I check it several times that it is correct.No, I just publish what I think at my website...Just because you think something, that doesn't make it true.
You don't expect me to publish Fake News or similar.
Examples:Right, because all of the eyewitnesses to the bombings are liars.
1. Atomic bombs
USA informed August 1945 that it had destroyed two Japanese towns using atomic bombs and killed 100 000's of people. My findings are that the US atomic bombs were (and are) Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm
2. Manned space travelRight, because there is no possible way for a bunch of highly motivated and very clever aerospace engineers to solve any of the challenges of manned space flight.
USA has informed during the 1960's that it has sent Americans orbiting Earth and visited the Moon. My findings are that no Americans were in space at all and that info to the contrary was (and is) Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
3. 911Right, because it's obvious that the entire NYC police and fire departments, dozens of TV news outlets, thousands of "victims" and tens of thousands of eyewitnesses are all wrong about how 2 of the tallest buildings in the world turned into giant piles of rubble.
USA informed September 2001 that Arabs had destroyed the World Trade Center at NY by flying planes into tops of skyscrapers. My findings are that no tops C of any structure cannot crush the intact bottom A into dust by gravity so Arabs doing it is Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/nist.htm
I know that particular interests do not like my findings but it is not my problem. I work for improved safety at sea.Then maybe you should stick to safety at sea and leave the nuclear physics, aerospace engineering and building demolitions to the people who work in those fields every day.
No, only twerps invent things about me. All the evidence is at my site but twerps do not understand it.That's a lie. You have admitted several times about how shoddy your research is. Basically you don't do any. You offer no evidence on your site, just you claiming things are impossible.Well, before I publish anything at my website, I check it several times that it is correct.No, I just publish what I think at my website...Just because you think something, that doesn't make it true.
You don't expect me to publish Fake News or similar.
Examples:
1. Atomic bombs
USA informed August 1945 that it had destroyed two Japanese towns using atomic bombs and killed 100 000's of people. My findings are that the US atomic bombs were (and are) Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm
2. Manned space travel
USA has informed during the 1960's that it has sent Americans orbiting Earth and visited the Moon. My findings are that no Americans were in space at all and that info to the contrary was (and is) Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
3. 911
USA informed September 2001 that Arabs had destroyed the World Trade Center at NY by flying planes into tops of skyscrapers. My findings are that no tops C of any structure cannot crush the intact bottom A into dust by gravity so Arabs doing it is Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/nist.htm
I know that particular interests do not like my findings but it is not my problem. I work for improved safety at sea.
You continually fail to prove you have the money, so your challenge is clearly fake and you are a fraud and a failure.
You are just jealous that I am rich and good looking.If you could actually do some real math and physics you would have a lot more to be jealous of.
You are just jealous that I am rich and good looking.If you could actually do some real math and physics you would have a lot more to be jealous of.
Besides, all the pictures I've seen are creepy and you've yet to provide any evidence that your are rich. A Wal-mart grade nespresso machine proves nothing.
The best way to show us you're rich is Buy Moose a ticket already!
You are a fraud because you run a fake challenge. Until you prove you have the money, it is fake.No, only twerps invent things about me. All the evidence is at my site but twerps do not understand it.That's a lie. You have admitted several times about how shoddy your research is. Basically you don't do any. You offer no evidence on your site, just you claiming things are impossible.Well, before I publish anything at my website, I check it several times that it is correct.No, I just publish what I think at my website...Just because you think something, that doesn't make it true.
You don't expect me to publish Fake News or similar.
Examples:
1. Atomic bombs
USA informed August 1945 that it had destroyed two Japanese towns using atomic bombs and killed 100 000's of people. My findings are that the US atomic bombs were (and are) Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm
2. Manned space travel
USA has informed during the 1960's that it has sent Americans orbiting Earth and visited the Moon. My findings are that no Americans were in space at all and that info to the contrary was (and is) Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
3. 911
USA informed September 2001 that Arabs had destroyed the World Trade Center at NY by flying planes into tops of skyscrapers. My findings are that no tops C of any structure cannot crush the intact bottom A into dust by gravity so Arabs doing it is Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/nist.htm
I know that particular interests do not like my findings but it is not my problem. I work for improved safety at sea.
You continually fail to prove you have the money, so your challenge is clearly fake and you are a fraud and a failure.
Why would I be a fraud and a failure after a successful career that is still going on. You are just jealous that I am rich and good looking.
But my Challenge is 100% real! http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm It is around since many years and only twerps try to win it.You are a fraud because you run a fake challenge. Until you prove you have the money, it is fake.No, only twerps invent things about me. All the evidence is at my site but twerps do not understand it.That's a lie. You have admitted several times about how shoddy your research is. Basically you don't do any. You offer no evidence on your site, just you claiming things are impossible.Well, before I publish anything at my website, I check it several times that it is correct.No, I just publish what I think at my website...Just because you think something, that doesn't make it true.
You don't expect me to publish Fake News or similar.
Examples:
1. Atomic bombs
USA informed August 1945 that it had destroyed two Japanese towns using atomic bombs and killed 100 000's of people. My findings are that the US atomic bombs were (and are) Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm
2. Manned space travel
USA has informed during the 1960's that it has sent Americans orbiting Earth and visited the Moon. My findings are that no Americans were in space at all and that info to the contrary was (and is) Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
3. 911
USA informed September 2001 that Arabs had destroyed the World Trade Center at NY by flying planes into tops of skyscrapers. My findings are that no tops C of any structure cannot crush the intact bottom A into dust by gravity so Arabs doing it is Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/nist.htm
I know that particular interests do not like my findings but it is not my problem. I work for improved safety at sea.
You continually fail to prove you have the money, so your challenge is clearly fake and you are a fraud and a failure.
Why would I be a fraud and a failure after a successful career that is still going on. You are just jealous that I am rich and good looking.
You are a failure because you never post any evidence to support your dumbass claims. You fail to do any actual research. You fail to prove your challenge is real. Fraud and failure.
Any other questions?
I have not tried to win your challenge Heiwa, truth be told I have never even looked at the website you spam.Lobster, caviar and champagne, as usual.
Anyway, this is ask Heiwa anything and I am bored of your usual spam and challenge nonsense
So I want to ask you
What did you eat for breakfast?
I have not tried to win your challenge Heiwa, truth be told I have never even looked at the website you spam.Lobster, caviar and champagne, as usual.
Anyway, this is ask Heiwa anything and I am bored of your usual spam and challenge nonsense
So I want to ask you
What did you eat for breakfast?
I have not tried to win your challenge Heiwa, truth be told I have never even looked at the website you spam.Lobster, caviar and champagne, as usual.
Anyway, this is ask Heiwa anything and I am bored of your usual spam and challenge nonsense
So I want to ask you
What did you eat for breakfast?
Lamest breakfast ever.I have not tried to win your challenge Heiwa, truth be told I have never even looked at the website you spam.Lobster, caviar and champagne, as usual.
Anyway, this is ask Heiwa anything and I am bored of your usual spam and challenge nonsense
So I want to ask you
What did you eat for breakfast?
Lamest breakfast ever.I have not tried to win your challenge Heiwa, truth be told I have never even looked at the website you spam.Lobster, caviar and champagne, as usual.
Anyway, this is ask Heiwa anything and I am bored of your usual spam and challenge nonsense
So I want to ask you
What did you eat for breakfast?
OK. Second lamest.Lamest breakfast ever.I have not tried to win your challenge Heiwa, truth be told I have never even looked at the website you spam.Lobster, caviar and champagne, as usual.
Anyway, this is ask Heiwa anything and I am bored of your usual spam and challenge nonsense
So I want to ask you
What did you eat for breakfast?
Beats the shit out of Gravy Train®
Only twerps think a challenge is real without proof of the money. I have shown repeatedly why you are a liar, fraud, fake, and failure. You have never once proven me wrong. Just more failure on your part.But my Challenge is 100% real! http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm It is around since many years and only twerps try to win it.You are a fraud because you run a fake challenge. Until you prove you have the money, it is fake.No, only twerps invent things about me. All the evidence is at my site but twerps do not understand it.That's a lie. You have admitted several times about how shoddy your research is. Basically you don't do any. You offer no evidence on your site, just you claiming things are impossible.Well, before I publish anything at my website, I check it several times that it is correct.No, I just publish what I think at my website...Just because you think something, that doesn't make it true.
You don't expect me to publish Fake News or similar.
Examples:
1. Atomic bombs
USA informed August 1945 that it had destroyed two Japanese towns using atomic bombs and killed 100 000's of people. My findings are that the US atomic bombs were (and are) Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm
2. Manned space travel
USA has informed during the 1960's that it has sent Americans orbiting Earth and visited the Moon. My findings are that no Americans were in space at all and that info to the contrary was (and is) Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
3. 911
USA informed September 2001 that Arabs had destroyed the World Trade Center at NY by flying planes into tops of skyscrapers. My findings are that no tops C of any structure cannot crush the intact bottom A into dust by gravity so Arabs doing it is Fake News. http://heiwaco.com/nist.htm
I know that particular interests do not like my findings but it is not my problem. I work for improved safety at sea.
You continually fail to prove you have the money, so your challenge is clearly fake and you are a fraud and a failure.
Why would I be a fraud and a failure after a successful career that is still going on. You are just jealous that I am rich and good looking.
You are a failure because you never post any evidence to support your dumbass claims. You fail to do any actual research. You fail to prove your challenge is real. Fraud and failure.
Any other questions?
Only twerps think a challenge is real without proof of the money. I have shown repeatedly why you are a liar, fraud, fake, and failure. You have never once proven me wrong. Just more failure on your part.
Hm, there is no need of proof of the money as everyone knows I am a rich, successful person. You just sound like a poor loser.Only twerps think a challenge is real without proof of the money. I have shown repeatedly why you are a liar, fraud, fake, and failure. You have never once proven me wrong. Just more failure on your part.
But my Challenge is 100% real! http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm It is around since many years and only twerps try to win it.
Hm, there is no need of proof of the money as everyone knows I am a rich, successful person. You just sound like a poor loser.Only twerps think a challenge is real without proof of the money. I have shown repeatedly why you are a liar, fraud, fake, and failure. You have never once proven me wrong. Just more failure on your part.
But my Challenge is 100% real! http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm It is around since many years and only twerps try to win it.
Hm, there is no need of proof of the money as everyone knows I am a rich, successful person. You just sound like a poor loser.Only twerps think a challenge is real without proof of the money. I have shown repeatedly why you are a liar, fraud, fake, and failure. You have never once proven me wrong. Just more failure on your part.
But my Challenge is 100% real! http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm It is around since many years and only twerps try to win it.
1. Name one person here who knows you are rich and successful. Everyone here as far as I'm aware thinks you are a poor, pathetic loser. You have lied again. You cant help yourself. Your a compulsive guttersniping liar.
2. Do you seriously have alcohol for breakfast Heiwa? Get help.
1. Most people here are anonymous twerps that I only know as such.Lame!
2. No! Actually, in the winter a coffee/cognac at my local bar really warms you up until noon.
You sound like a twerp. But how do you get started a cold, dark, winter morning, where ever you are?1. Most people here are anonymous twerps that I only know as such.Lame!
2. No! Actually, in the winter a coffee/cognac at my local bar really warms you up until noon.
Lame alcoholicYou sound like a twerp. But how do you get started a cold, dark, winter morning, where ever you are?1. Most people here are anonymous twerps that I only know as such.Lame!
2. No! Actually, in the winter a coffee/cognac at my local bar really warms you up until noon.
At my place a coffee/cognac at 07 am at the local bar saves the day.
Can you read heiwa? You just broke every fucking rule for participation in this thread. Pretend we are sitting at your table right now enjoying a Nespresso. What do you say on the matter? Your website links are forbidden. Your use of the word Twerps can only be used if someone disrespects you personally while 'in your office'.
So please try again. I took the time to ask the question. Take some time to answer it. Your own words, here and now. Just like I'm at your table
I hate to say it but I am fantasizing about being with you right now Heiwa! Give it to me!!!
You sound like a twerp. But how do you get started a cold, dark, winter morning, where ever you are?1. Most people here are anonymous twerps that I only know as such.Lame!
2. No! Actually, in the winter a coffee/cognac at my local bar really warms you up until noon.
At my place a coffee/cognac at 07 am at the local bar saves the day.
Seriously. He starts drinking at 7 am. Has wine with lunch, whiskey before and after dinner. He's a drunk and can't understand why no one accepts his unsupported bullshit.You sound like a twerp. But how do you get started a cold, dark, winter morning, where ever you are?1. Most people here are anonymous twerps that I only know as such.Lame!
2. No! Actually, in the winter a coffee/cognac at my local bar really warms you up until noon.
At my place a coffee/cognac at 07 am at the local bar saves the day.
Relies on ingesting drugs or poison to save his day.... This guy needs help
Well, cognac is a French product since 100's of years and, with coffee, after dinner is not bad. And also a small one with coffee on a very cold winter morning. But it is not cheap. A VSOP cognac costs.You sound like a twerp. But how do you get started a cold, dark, winter morning, where ever you are?1. Most people here are anonymous twerps that I only know as such.Lame!
2. No! Actually, in the winter a coffee/cognac at my local bar really warms you up until noon.
At my place a coffee/cognac at 07 am at the local bar saves the day.
Relies on ingesting drugs or poison to save his day.... This guy needs help
Lame and drunk!
Well, cognac is a French product since 100's of years and, with coffee, after dinner is not bad.
Lamer!Lame and drunk!
You don't get drunk by a small cognac. It actually makes you feel well. You sound like a twerp not liking the good life.
Lame and drunk!
You don't get drunk by a small cognac. It actually makes you feel well. You sound like a twerp not liking the good life.
No, I am not a twerp. See my website http://heiwaco.com .Lame and drunk!
You don't get drunk by a small cognac. It actually makes you feel well. You sound like a twerp not liking the good life.
You sound like a twerp writing about the kind of life he only wished he was living.
Yep, the website of an ignorant lying twerp. You prove his point.No, I am not a twerp. See my website http://heiwaco.com .Lame and drunk!
You don't get drunk by a small cognac. It actually makes you feel well. You sound like a twerp not liking the good life.
You sound like a twerp writing about the kind of life he only wished he was living.
You sound unhappy. Do you have financial problems? Or are you sick? No friends? Sorry but I can't help.Yep, the website of an ignorant lying twerp. You prove his point.No, I am not a twerp. See my website http://heiwaco.com .Lame and drunk!
You don't get drunk by a small cognac. It actually makes you feel well. You sound like a twerp not liking the good life.
You sound like a twerp writing about the kind of life he only wished he was living.
More failure. LameYou sound unhappy. Do you have financial problems? Or are you sick? No friends? Sorry but I can't help.Yep, the website of an ignorant lying twerp. You prove his point.No, I am not a twerp. See my website http://heiwaco.com .Lame and drunk!
You don't get drunk by a small cognac. It actually makes you feel well. You sound like a twerp not liking the good life.
You sound like a twerp writing about the kind of life he only wished he was living.
No, I am just sorry I cannot help!More failure. LameYou sound unhappy. Do you have financial problems? Or are you sick? No friends? Sorry but I can't help.Yep, the website of an ignorant lying twerp. You prove his point.No, I am not a twerp. See my website http://heiwaco.com .Lame and drunk!
You don't get drunk by a small cognac. It actually makes you feel well. You sound like a twerp not liking the good life.
You sound like a twerp writing about the kind of life he only wished he was living.
Can't you take a hint? Nobody here falls for the rubbish on your horrible website with, as always no evidence to support your claims.More failure. LameNo, I am just sorry I cannot help!
My Safety-at-Sea website http://heiwaco.com is running since >20 years. What is wrong with safety at sea?Can't you take a hint? Nobody here falls for the rubbish on your horrible website with, as always no evidence to support your claims.More failure. LameNo, I am just sorry I cannot help!
Go and try your deception elsewhere!
See: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge « Reply #8422 on: Today at 09:52:34 PM » (https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=62555.msg2048527#msg2048527)Go and try your deception elsewhere!My Safety-at-Sea website http://heiwaco.com is running since >20 years. What is wrong with safety at sea?
More failure. Lame. What is wrong with proving you have the money to pay your challenges?My Safety-at-Sea website http://heiwaco.com is running since >20 years. What is wrong with safety at sea?Can't you take a hint? Nobody here falls for the rubbish on your horrible website with, as always no evidence to support your claims.More failure. LameNo, I am just sorry I cannot help!
Go and try your deception elsewhere!
Lame and drunk!
You don't get drunk by a small cognac. It actually makes you feel well. You sound like a twerp not liking the good life.
And what is the question?Lame and drunk!
You don't get drunk by a small cognac. It actually makes you feel well. You sound like a twerp not liking the good life.
Some of us 'feel well' without the need to drink alcohol first thing in the morning. You sound like you are sick.
No question. But since you asked, why do you not feel well that you need to intoxicate yourself with alcohol first thing every morning?I normally feel well in the mornings with no need to intoxicate myself with alcohol, BUT, very cold winter mornings, when I used to have a coffee in a bar near bye before work, I noticed some clients having a small cognac (2 cl) to warm up and I copied the habit. But only very cold winter mornings. I think it is good for the stomach ... in the winter. Like medicine. To keep you healthy. However, when I worked in Japan ... after work ... and ... before dinner ... we used to warm up with a couple of dry Martinis ... every night ... to get hungry. That was 40 years ago and it didn't hurt me. 25 years ago, when I was in the ***** luxury cruise business, it was plenty drinks before dinner with the paying passengers all the time and then lobster, caviar, vodka and champagne to start the evenings. The ship owner was Russian of course. It didn't hurt me. You sound like a prohibition supporter to assist Al Capone & Co that are still around, i.e. like a twerp.
You sound unhappy. Do you have financial problems? Or are you sick? No friends? Sorry but I can't help.
No question. But since you asked, why do you not feel well that you need to intoxicate yourself with alcohol first thing every morning?I normally feel well in the mornings with no need to intoxicate myself with alcohol, BUT, very cold winter mornings, when I used to have a coffee in a bar near bye before work, I noticed some clients having a small cognac (2 cl) to warm up and I copied the habit. But only very cold winter mornings. I think it is good for the stomach ... in the winter. Like medicine. To keep you healthy. However, when I worked in Japan ... after work ... and ... before dinner ... we used to warm up with a couple of dry Martinis ... every night ... to get hungry. That was 40 years ago and it didn't hurt me. 25 years ago, when I was in the ***** luxury cruise business, it was plenty drinks before dinner with the paying passengers all the time and then lobster, caviar, vodka and champagne to start the evenings. The ship owner was Russian of course. It didn't hurt me. You sound like a prohibition supporter to assist Al Capone & Co that are still around, i.e. like a twerp.
Thanks for asking a question. It seems my immune system is OK. Maybe it is due to traveling around the world for almost 50 years being exposed germs and diseases everywhere, i.e. keeping it in shape.No question. But since you asked, why do you not feel well that you need to intoxicate yourself with alcohol first thing every morning?I normally feel well in the mornings with no need to intoxicate myself with alcohol, BUT, very cold winter mornings, when I used to have a coffee in a bar near bye before work, I noticed some clients having a small cognac (2 cl) to warm up and I copied the habit. But only very cold winter mornings. I think it is good for the stomach ... in the winter. Like medicine. To keep you healthy. However, when I worked in Japan ... after work ... and ... before dinner ... we used to warm up with a couple of dry Martinis ... every night ... to get hungry. That was 40 years ago and it didn't hurt me. 25 years ago, when I was in the ***** luxury cruise business, it was plenty drinks before dinner with the paying passengers all the time and then lobster, caviar, vodka and champagne to start the evenings. The ship owner was Russian of course. It didn't hurt me. You sound like a prohibition supporter to assist Al Capone & Co that are still around, i.e. like a twerp.
Yes, most of your story was when you were a lot younger. You are old now Heiwa. You already look like you have one foot in the grave. Your liver is not only not how it used to be, but given what you said above probably compromised with mild cirrhosis from all that drinking. Most people put on an extra jumper to get warm.
The payoff of the disinfection qualities of alcohol vs the damage done having the liver detoxify it and the destruction of brain cells while the alcohol is swimming in your brain is simply not worth it. Also alcohol increases the risk of cancer almost anywhere it is in contact with such as the mouth, throat, stomach and bowel.
Again, most people have good immune systems which negate the need for alcohol to kill germs. Is your immune system OK Heiwa?
Only assholes are arrogant enough to think their views are the only correct views and anyone with “other ideas” is a twerp.Thanks for asking a question. It seems my immune system is OK. Maybe it is due to traveling around the world for almost 50 years being exposed germs and diseases everywhere, i.e. keeping it in shape.No question. But since you asked, why do you not feel well that you need to intoxicate yourself with alcohol first thing every morning?I normally feel well in the mornings with no need to intoxicate myself with alcohol, BUT, very cold winter mornings, when I used to have a coffee in a bar near bye before work, I noticed some clients having a small cognac (2 cl) to warm up and I copied the habit. But only very cold winter mornings. I think it is good for the stomach ... in the winter. Like medicine. To keep you healthy. However, when I worked in Japan ... after work ... and ... before dinner ... we used to warm up with a couple of dry Martinis ... every night ... to get hungry. That was 40 years ago and it didn't hurt me. 25 years ago, when I was in the ***** luxury cruise business, it was plenty drinks before dinner with the paying passengers all the time and then lobster, caviar, vodka and champagne to start the evenings. The ship owner was Russian of course. It didn't hurt me. You sound like a prohibition supporter to assist Al Capone & Co that are still around, i.e. like a twerp.
Yes, most of your story was when you were a lot younger. You are old now Heiwa. You already look like you have one foot in the grave. Your liver is not only not how it used to be, but given what you said above probably compromised with mild cirrhosis from all that drinking. Most people put on an extra jumper to get warm.
The payoff of the disinfection qualities of alcohol vs the damage done having the liver detoxify it and the destruction of brain cells while the alcohol is swimming in your brain is simply not worth it. Also alcohol increases the risk of cancer almost anywhere it is in contact with such as the mouth, throat, stomach and bowel.
Again, most people have good immune systems which negate the need for alcohol to kill germs. Is your immune system OK Heiwa?
I was asked to give blood to a local 'blood bank' long ago, but when the doctor heard about my travels, my blood was considered not good enough. Anyway, regular medical check ups haven't found anything wrong with me.
BTW my mother is almost 99 years old and she always used to have an aperitif before dinner and several glasses of a good red wine during dinner. And she is still in rather good shape. I personally think daily intake of a good Bordeaux (red) keeps the doctor away. Only twerps have other ideas.
Only assholes are arrogant enough to think their views are the only correct views and anyone with “other ideas” is a twerp.Thanks for asking a question. It seems my immune system is OK. Maybe it is due to traveling around the world for almost 50 years being exposed germs and diseases everywhere, i.e. keeping it in shape.No question. But since you asked, why do you not feel well that you need to intoxicate yourself with alcohol first thing every morning?I normally feel well in the mornings with no need to intoxicate myself with alcohol, BUT, very cold winter mornings, when I used to have a coffee in a bar near bye before work, I noticed some clients having a small cognac (2 cl) to warm up and I copied the habit. But only very cold winter mornings. I think it is good for the stomach ... in the winter. Like medicine. To keep you healthy. However, when I worked in Japan ... after work ... and ... before dinner ... we used to warm up with a couple of dry Martinis ... every night ... to get hungry. That was 40 years ago and it didn't hurt me. 25 years ago, when I was in the ***** luxury cruise business, it was plenty drinks before dinner with the paying passengers all the time and then lobster, caviar, vodka and champagne to start the evenings. The ship owner was Russian of course. It didn't hurt me. You sound like a prohibition supporter to assist Al Capone & Co that are still around, i.e. like a twerp.
Yes, most of your story was when you were a lot younger. You are old now Heiwa. You already look like you have one foot in the grave. Your liver is not only not how it used to be, but given what you said above probably compromised with mild cirrhosis from all that drinking. Most people put on an extra jumper to get warm.
The payoff of the disinfection qualities of alcohol vs the damage done having the liver detoxify it and the destruction of brain cells while the alcohol is swimming in your brain is simply not worth it. Also alcohol increases the risk of cancer almost anywhere it is in contact with such as the mouth, throat, stomach and bowel.
Again, most people have good immune systems which negate the need for alcohol to kill germs. Is your immune system OK Heiwa?
I was asked to give blood to a local 'blood bank' long ago, but when the doctor heard about my travels, my blood was considered not good enough. Anyway, regular medical check ups haven't found anything wrong with me.
BTW my mother is almost 99 years old and she always used to have an aperitif before dinner and several glasses of a good red wine during dinner. And she is still in rather good shape. I personally think daily intake of a good Bordeaux (red) keeps the doctor away. Only twerps have other ideas.
That makes you an arrogant ass.
Mike
What is the question?What would it take to convince you that you have ever been wrong about anything?
What is the question?
Just win one of my five €1M Challenges - http://heiwaco.com/chall.htm .What is the question?What would it take to convince you that you have ever been wrong about anything?
Just win one of my five €1M Challenges - http://www.ratemypoo.comWhat is the question?What would it take to convince you that you have ever been wrong about anything?
Thanks for asking. No, I am not inept. On the contrary I am reasonable, intelligent and serious in work and discussions. Only twerps think my Challenges are fake or rigged or I lack money. BTW my coffee machine works OK so no need to replace it.Just win one of my five €1M Challenges - http://www.ratemypoo.comWhat is the question?What would it take to convince you that you have ever been wrong about anything?
Are you so inept Heiwa? No one gives a shit to bother trying your fake, rigged challenges. You don't even have the money. You don't even have the money to buy a decent coffee machine FFS!
Thanks for asking. No, I am not inept. On the contrary I am reasonable, intelligent and serious in work and discussions. Only twerps think my Challenges are fake or rigged or I lack money. BTW my coffee machine works OK so no need to replace it.Just win one of my five €1M Challenges - http://www.ratemypoo.comWhat is the question?What would it take to convince you that you have ever been wrong about anything?
Are you so inept Heiwa? No one gives a shit to bother trying your fake, rigged challenges. You don't even have the money. You don't even have the money to buy a decent coffee machine FFS!
You mean my stylish Nespresso Magimix? I have no idea? I got it many years ago.Thanks for asking. No, I am not inept. On the contrary I am reasonable, intelligent and serious in work and discussions. Only twerps think my Challenges are fake or rigged or I lack money. BTW my coffee machine works OK so no need to replace it.Just win one of my five €1M Challenges - http://www.ratemypoo.comWhat is the question?What would it take to convince you that you have ever been wrong about anything?
Are you so inept Heiwa? No one gives a shit to bother trying your fake, rigged challenges. You don't even have the money. You don't even have the money to buy a decent coffee machine FFS!
How much did that coffee machine set you back?
I do. You can get one for $150 at Walmart.I have no idea.Thanks for asking. No, I am not inept. On the contrary I am reasonable, intelligent and serious in work and discussions. Only twerps think my Challenges are fake or rigged or I lack money. BTW my coffee machine works OK so no need to replace it.Just win one of my five €1M Challenges - http://www.ratemypoo.comWhat is the question?What would it take to convince you that you have ever been wrong about anything?
Are you so inept Heiwa? No one gives a shit to bother trying your fake, rigged challenges. You don't even have the money. You don't even have the money to buy a decent coffee machine FFS!
How much did that coffee machine set you back?
You mean my stylish Nespresso Magimix? I have no idea? I got it many years ago.Thanks for asking. No, I am not inept. On the contrary I am reasonable, intelligent and serious in work and discussions. Only twerps think my Challenges are fake or rigged or I lack money. BTW my coffee machine works OK so no need to replace it.Just win one of my five €1M Challenges - http://www.ratemypoo.comWhat is the question?What would it take to convince you that you have ever been wrong about anything?
Are you so inept Heiwa? No one gives a shit to bother trying your fake, rigged challenges. You don't even have the money. You don't even have the money to buy a decent coffee machine FFS!
How much did that coffee machine set you back?
We KNOW you "lack money" because you lied about it.Thanks for asking. No, I am not inept. On the contrary I am reasonable, intelligent and serious in work and discussions. Only twerps think my Challenges are fake or rigged or I lack money. BTW my coffee machine works OK so no need to replace it.Just win one of my five €1M Challenges - http://www.ratemypoo.comWhat is the question?What would it take to convince you that you have ever been wrong about anything?
Are you so inept Heiwa? No one gives a shit to bother trying your fake, rigged challenges. You don't even have the money. You don't even have the money to buy a decent coffee machine FFS!
You're a liar. If your challenge was real and if you had the money you would prove it.Thanks for asking. No, I am not inept. On the contrary I am reasonable, intelligent and serious in work and discussions. Only twerps think my Challenges are fake or rigged or I lack money. BTW my coffee machine works OK so no need to replace it.Just win one of my five €1M Challenges - http://www.ratemypoo.comWhat is the question?What would it take to convince you that you have ever been wrong about anything?
Are you so inept Heiwa? No one gives a shit to bother trying your fake, rigged challenges. You don't even have the money. You don't even have the money to buy a decent coffee machine FFS!
In order to win one of your challenges I have to convince you that you're wrong about a lot of things. How can I do that if you aren't willing to admit that you're wrong about anything?Just win one of my five €1M Challenges.What is the question?What would it take to convince you that you have ever been wrong about anything?
That was two questions. You have to win one of my five €1M Challenges to proceed. I know you are a government, paid twerp but just carry on anyway. It seems Donald the great Twitterer is surrounded by twerps like you. Are you happy about it?In order to win one of your challenges I have to convince you that you're wrong about a lot of things. How can I do that if you aren't willing to admit that you're wrong about anything?Just win one of my five €1M Challenges.What is the question?What would it take to convince you that you have ever been wrong about anything?
No. That was one statement followed by one question. Do you know the difference between a statement and a question? I'll give you a hint: questions have a question mark at the end.That was two questions. You have to win one of my five €1M Challenges to proceed. I know you are a government, paid twerp but just carry on anyway. It seems Donald the great Twitterer is surrounded by twerps like you. Are you happy about it?In order to win one of your challenges I have to convince you that you're wrong about a lot of things. How can I do that if you aren't willing to admit that you're wrong about anything?Just win one of my five €1M Challenges.What is the question?What would it take to convince you that you have ever been wrong about anything?
Psychology is a science.
Have you ever been wrong about anything?Probably.
Have you ever been wrong about anything?Probably.
However I am pretty certain that atomic bombs are a hoax and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by napalm 1945. I am also pretty certain that Yuri Gagarin never orbited Earth April 1961 and that no humans have ever been in space. And I know for certain that stormy weather didn't knock off the bow visor of M/V Estonia September 1994 in the Baltic sea. That is when I was first accused of being a conspiracy theorist.
And this 911 show 2001 with three skyscrapers collapsing at NY caused by Arabs and an Egyptian was produced in-house USA. And finally this fusion on Earth 2035 project down the road from me is complete nonsense. It will never work.
Just prove me wrong about these five events and collect €1M! http://heiwaco.com
Can you mention a few things you've been wrong about?Have you ever been wrong about anything?Probably.
However I am pretty certain that atomic bombs are a hoax and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by napalm 1945. I am also pretty certain that Yuri Gagarin never orbited Earth April 1961 and that no humans have ever been in space. And I know for certain that stormy weather didn't knock off the bow visor of M/V Estonia September 1994 in the Baltic sea. That is when I was first accused of being a conspiracy theorist.
And this 911 show 2001 with three skyscrapers collapsing at NY caused by Arabs and an Egyptian was produced in-house USA. And finally this fusion on Earth 2035 project down the road from me is complete nonsense. It will never work.
Just prove me wrong about these five events and collect €1M! http://heiwashorseshit.com
Just prove me wrong about these five events and collect €1M!
I use the word pretty adverbially to mean fairly or moderately. I use certain to mean there is no doubt about it. So there is no chance that I am wrong about any of the five events I mention at http://heiwaco.com - my popular website.Can you mention a few things you've been wrong about?Have you ever been wrong about anything?Probably.
However I am pretty certain that atomic bombs are a hoax and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by napalm 1945. I am also pretty certain that Yuri Gagarin never orbited Earth April 1961 and that no humans have ever been in space. And I know for certain that stormy weather didn't knock off the bow visor of M/V Estonia September 1994 in the Baltic sea. That is when I was first accused of being a conspiracy theorist.
And this 911 show 2001 with three skyscrapers collapsing at NY caused by Arabs and an Egyptian was produced in-house USA. And finally this fusion on Earth 2035 project down the road from me is complete nonsense. It will never work.
Just prove me wrong about any of these five events and collect €1M! http://heiwaco.com
Also, what does pretty certain mean? It seems you're allowing for the possibility, however small, that you might be wrong?
I use the word pretty adverbially to mean fairly or moderately. I use certain to mean there is no doubt about it. So there is no chance that I am wrong about any of the five events I mention at http://heiwaco.com - my popular website.Can you mention a few things you've been wrong about?Have you ever been wrong about anything?Probably.
However I am pretty certain that atomic bombs are a hoax and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by napalm 1945. I am also pretty certain that Yuri Gagarin never orbited Earth April 1961 and that no humans have ever been in space. And I know for certain that stormy weather didn't knock off the bow visor of M/V Estonia September 1994 in the Baltic sea. That is when I was first accused of being a conspiracy theorist.
And this 911 show 2001 with three skyscrapers collapsing at NY caused by Arabs and an Egyptian was produced in-house USA. And finally this fusion on Earth 2035 project down the road from me is complete nonsense. It will never work.
Just prove me wrong about any of these five events and collect €1M! http://heiwaco.com
Also, what does pretty certain mean? It seems you're allowing for the possibility, however small, that you might be wrong?
I am pretty certain that you suffer from cognitive dissonance! Ever heard about it?
Hey Heiwa, what are your thoughts on the Texas flood last year? Would there have been a flood if homes had gutters?
Thanks for asking. Yes, I recall that. At Houston, Texas, they build houses in the gutters, so when it rains, the houses are flooded. I could never understand why, but maybe I am wrong about it. Wasn't the reason to allow Texan guttersnipes to have a bath?Have you ever been wrong about anything?Probably.
However I am pretty certain that atomic bombs are a hoax and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by napalm 1945. I am also pretty certain that Yuri Gagarin never orbited Earth April 1961 and that no humans have ever been in space. And I know for certain that stormy weather didn't knock off the bow visor of M/V Estonia September 1994 in the Baltic sea. That is when I was first accused of being a conspiracy theorist.
And this 911 show 2001 with three skyscrapers collapsing at NY caused by Arabs and an Egyptian was produced in-house USA. And finally this fusion on Earth 2035 project down the road from me is complete nonsense. It will never work.
Just prove me wrong about these five events and collect €1M! http://heiwaco.com
Hey Heiwa, what are your thoughts on the Texas flood last year? Would there have been a flood if homes had gutters?
Thanks for asking. Yes, I recall that. At Houston, Texas, they build houses in the gutters, so when it rains, the houses are flooded. I could never understand why, but maybe I am wrong about it. Wasn't the reason to allow Texan guttersnipes to have a bath?Have you ever been wrong about anything?Probably.
However I am pretty certain that atomic bombs are a hoax and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by napalm 1945. I am also pretty certain that Yuri Gagarin never orbited Earth April 1961 and that no humans have ever been in space. And I know for certain that stormy weather didn't knock off the bow visor of M/V Estonia September 1994 in the Baltic sea. That is when I was first accused of being a conspiracy theorist.
And this 911 show 2001 with three skyscrapers collapsing at NY caused by Arabs and an Egyptian was produced in-house USA. And finally this fusion on Earth 2035 project down the road from me is complete nonsense. It will never work.
Just prove me wrong about these five events and collect €1M! http://heiwaco.com (http://heiwaco.com)
Hey Heiwa, what are your thoughts on the Texas flood last year? Would there have been a flood if homes had gutters?
Why do you say "pretty certain" when what you mean is "certain"?I use the word pretty adverbially to mean fairly or moderately. I use certain to mean there is no doubt about it. So there is no chance that I am wrong about any of the five events I mention at http://heiwashorseshit.com - my popular website.Can you mention a few things you've been wrong about?Have you ever been wrong about anything?Probably.
However I am pretty certain that atomic bombs are a hoax and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by napalm 1945. I am also pretty certain that Yuri Gagarin never orbited Earth April 1961 and that no humans have ever been in space. And I know for certain that stormy weather didn't knock off the bow visor of M/V Estonia September 1994 in the Baltic sea. That is when I was first accused of being a conspiracy theorist.
And this 911 show 2001 with three skyscrapers collapsing at NY caused by Arabs and an Egyptian was produced in-house USA. And finally this fusion on Earth 2035 project down the road from me is complete nonsense. It will never work.
Just prove me wrong about any of these five events and collect €1M! http://heiwashorseshit.com
Also, what does pretty certain mean? It seems you're allowing for the possibility, however small, that you might be wrong?
I am pretty certain that you suffer from cognitive dissonance! Ever heard about it?
Sorry, I am 100% certain you suffer from cognitive dissonance! No doubt about it.Why do you say "pretty certain" when what you mean is "certain"?I use the word pretty adverbially to mean fairly or moderately. I use certain to mean there is no doubt about it. So there is no chance that I am wrong about any of the five events I mention at http://heiwaco.com - my popular website.Can you mention a few things you've been wrong about?Have you ever been wrong about anything?Probably.
However I am pretty certain that atomic bombs are a hoax and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by napalm 1945. I am also pretty certain that Yuri Gagarin never orbited Earth April 1961 and that no humans have ever been in space. And I know for certain that stormy weather didn't knock off the bow visor of M/V Estonia September 1994 in the Baltic sea. That is when I was first accused of being a conspiracy theorist.
And this 911 show 2001 with three skyscrapers collapsing at NY caused by Arabs and an Egyptian was produced in-house USA. And finally this fusion on Earth 2035 project down the road from me is complete nonsense. It will never work.
Just prove me wrong about any of these five events and collect €1M! http://heiwaco.com
Also, what does pretty certain mean? It seems you're allowing for the possibility, however small, that you might be wrong?
I am pretty certain that you suffer from cognitive dissonance! Ever heard about it?
Also, what are some things you've been wrong about?
Is that why you avoid facts? You don't want to be cured?Sorry, I am 100% certain you suffer from cognitive dissonance! No doubt about it.Why do you say "pretty certain" when what you mean is "certain"?I use the word pretty adverbially to mean fairly or moderately. I use certain to mean there is no doubt about it. So there is no chance that I am wrong about any of the five events I mention at http://heiwaco.com - my popular website.Can you mention a few things you've been wrong about?Have you ever been wrong about anything?Probably.
However I am pretty certain that atomic bombs are a hoax and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by napalm 1945. I am also pretty certain that Yuri Gagarin never orbited Earth April 1961 and that no humans have ever been in space. And I know for certain that stormy weather didn't knock off the bow visor of M/V Estonia September 1994 in the Baltic sea. That is when I was first accused of being a conspiracy theorist.
And this 911 show 2001 with three skyscrapers collapsing at NY caused by Arabs and an Egyptian was produced in-house USA. And finally this fusion on Earth 2035 project down the road from me is complete nonsense. It will never work.
Just prove me wrong about any of these five events and collect €1M! http://heiwaco.com
Also, what does pretty certain mean? It seems you're allowing for the possibility, however small, that you might be wrong?
I am pretty certain that you suffer from cognitive dissonance! Ever heard about it?
Also, what are some things you've been wrong about?
What things have I been wrong about?
When I was small I was afraid of atomic bombs, because I was told they were dangerous, etc. I was wrong. I was just lied to. Then I was told people had visited space and I believed it too, until I realized I was wrong. The people in question were just lying actors. But to keep everyone happy I agreed that atomic bombs and people in space were fantastic. I was a victim of cognitive dissonance!
The cure of cognitive dissonance is simple. Just check the facts.
Have you ever been wrong about anything?Probably.
However I am pretty certain that atomic bombs are a hoax and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by napalm 1945. I am also pretty certain that Yuri Gagarin never orbited Earth April 1961 and that no humans have ever been in space. And I know for certain that stormy weather didn't knock off the bow visor of M/V Estonia September 1994 in the Baltic sea. That is when I was first accused of being a conspiracy theorist.
And this 911 show 2001 with three skyscrapers collapsing at NY caused by Arabs and an Egyptian was produced in-house USA. And finally this fusion on Earth 2035 project down the road from me is complete nonsense. It will never work.
Just prove me wrong about these five events and collect €1M! http://heiwaco.com
Yes. All proof backing my findings are at http://heiwaco.com .Have you ever been wrong about anything?Probably.
However I am pretty certain that atomic bombs are a hoax and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by napalm 1945. I am also pretty certain that Yuri Gagarin never orbited Earth April 1961 and that no humans have ever been in space. And I know for certain that stormy weather didn't knock off the bow visor of M/V Estonia September 1994 in the Baltic sea. That is when I was first accused of being a conspiracy theorist.
And this 911 show 2001 with three skyscrapers collapsing at NY caused by Arabs and an Egyptian was produced in-house USA. And finally this fusion on Earth 2035 project down the road from me is complete nonsense. It will never work.
Just prove me wrong about these five events and collect €1M! http://heiwaco.com
Sure, and the Titanic wasn't sunk by an iceberg.
Do you have any proof backing your assertions?
He's a liar. There is no proof at his website. It's mostly him just saying he doesn't understand it so it must be fake.Yes. All proof backing my findings are at http://heiwaco.com .Have you ever been wrong about anything?Probably.
However I am pretty certain that atomic bombs are a hoax and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by napalm 1945. I am also pretty certain that Yuri Gagarin never orbited Earth April 1961 and that no humans have ever been in space. And I know for certain that stormy weather didn't knock off the bow visor of M/V Estonia September 1994 in the Baltic sea. That is when I was first accused of being a conspiracy theorist.
And this 911 show 2001 with three skyscrapers collapsing at NY caused by Arabs and an Egyptian was produced in-house USA. And finally this fusion on Earth 2035 project down the road from me is complete nonsense. It will never work.
Just prove me wrong about these five events and collect €1M! http://heiwaco.com
Sure, and the Titanic wasn't sunk by an iceberg.
Do you have any proof backing your assertions?
But pls note I don't claim anything about the RMS Titanic 1912 sinking.
But I don't think a ship colliding with an ice berg in calm seas in the middle of the night ripping open the fairly strong side shell plates causing catastrophic sinking is realistic. I think the shipowners just invented it back then.
I have investigated >100 incidents at sea and, even if everything happens there, ice bergs do not rip open ship hull plates 1912 and waves do not knock off bow visors 1994.
You can quote me.
Media will ignore you!
There are plenty marine insurance frauds around. Ship hull underwriters and P&I clubs are very easy to manipulate to pay illegal claims of all sorts. It is like politics. Just invent anything ... and you get away with it.
How can you be so certain? What if you're wrong? After all, you've been wrong before!Sorry, I am 100% certain you suffer from cognitive dissonance! No doubt about it.Why do you say "pretty certain" when what you mean is "certain"?I use the word pretty adverbially to mean fairly or moderately. I use certain to mean there is no doubt about it. So there is no chance that I am wrong about any of the five events I mention at http://heiwaco.com - my popular website.Can you mention a few things you've been wrong about?Have you ever been wrong about anything?Probably.
However I am pretty certain that atomic bombs are a hoax and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by napalm 1945. I am also pretty certain that Yuri Gagarin never orbited Earth April 1961 and that no humans have ever been in space. And I know for certain that stormy weather didn't knock off the bow visor of M/V Estonia September 1994 in the Baltic sea. That is when I was first accused of being a conspiracy theorist.
And this 911 show 2001 with three skyscrapers collapsing at NY caused by Arabs and an Egyptian was produced in-house USA. And finally this fusion on Earth 2035 project down the road from me is complete nonsense. It will never work.
Just prove me wrong about any of these five events and collect €1M! http://heiwaco.com
Also, what does pretty certain mean? It seems you're allowing for the possibility, however small, that you might be wrong?
I am pretty certain that you suffer from cognitive dissonance! Ever heard about it?
Also, what are some things you've been wrong about?
What things have I been wrong about?
When I was small I was afraid of atomic bombs, because I was told they were dangerous, etc. I was wrong. I was just lied to. Then I was told people had visited space and I believed it too, until I realized I was wrong. The people in question were just lying actors. But to keep everyone happy I agreed that atomic bombs and people in space were fantastic. I was a victim of cognitive dissonance!
The cure of cognitive dissonance is simple. Just check the facts.
Yes. All proof backing my findings are at http://heiwaco.com .Have you ever been wrong about anything?Probably.
However I am pretty certain that atomic bombs are a hoax and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by napalm 1945. I am also pretty certain that Yuri Gagarin never orbited Earth April 1961 and that no humans have ever been in space. And I know for certain that stormy weather didn't knock off the bow visor of M/V Estonia September 1994 in the Baltic sea. That is when I was first accused of being a conspiracy theorist.
And this 911 show 2001 with three skyscrapers collapsing at NY caused by Arabs and an Egyptian was produced in-house USA. And finally this fusion on Earth 2035 project down the road from me is complete nonsense. It will never work.
Just prove me wrong about these five events and collect €1M! http://heiwaco.com
Sure, and the Titanic wasn't sunk by an iceberg.
Do you have any proof backing your assertions?
But pls note I don't claim anything about the RMS Titanic 1912 sinking.
But I don't think a ship colliding with an ice berg in calm seas in the middle of the night ripping open the fairly strong side shell plates causing catastrophic sinking is realistic. I think the shipowners just invented it back then.
I have investigated >100 incidents at sea and, even if everything happens there, ice bergs do not rip open ship hull plates 1912 and waves do not knock off bow visors 1994.
You can quote me.
Media will ignore you!
There are plenty marine insurance frauds around. Ship hull underwriters and P&I clubs are very easy to manipulate to pay illegal claims of all sorts. It is like politics. Just invent anything ... and you get away with it.
Yes. All proof backing my findings are at http://heiwaco.com .Have you ever been wrong about anything?Probably.
However I am pretty certain that atomic bombs are a hoax and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by napalm 1945. I am also pretty certain that Yuri Gagarin never orbited Earth April 1961 and that no humans have ever been in space. And I know for certain that stormy weather didn't knock off the bow visor of M/V Estonia September 1994 in the Baltic sea. That is when I was first accused of being a conspiracy theorist.
And this 911 show 2001 with three skyscrapers collapsing at NY caused by Arabs and an Egyptian was produced in-house USA. And finally this fusion on Earth 2035 project down the road from me is complete nonsense. It will never work.
Just prove me wrong about these five events and collect €1M! http://heiwaco.com
Sure, and the Titanic wasn't sunk by an iceberg.
Do you have any proof backing your assertions?
But pls note I don't claim anything about the RMS Titanic 1912 sinking.
But I don't think a ship colliding with an ice berg in calm seas in the middle of the night ripping open the fairly strong side shell plates causing catastrophic sinking is realistic. I think the shipowners just invented it back then.
I have investigated >100 incidents at sea and, even if everything happens there, ice bergs do not rip open ship hull plates 1912 and waves do not knock off bow visors 1994.
You can quote me.
Media will ignore you!
There are plenty marine insurance frauds around. Ship hull underwriters and P&I clubs are very easy to manipulate to pay illegal claims of all sorts. It is like politics. Just invent anything ... and you get away with it.
He's a liar. There is no proof at his website. It's mostly him just saying he doesn't understand it so it must be fake.
He's a fraud and his challenges are fake. He doesn't have the money.
I explain it at http://heiwaco.com .How can you be so certain? What if you're wrong? After all, you've been wrong before!Sorry, I am 100% certain you suffer from cognitive dissonance! No doubt about it.Why do you say "pretty certain" when what you mean is "certain"?I use the word pretty adverbially to mean fairly or moderately. I use certain to mean there is no doubt about it. So there is no chance that I am wrong about any of the five events I mention at http://heiwaco.com - my popular website.Can you mention a few things you've been wrong about?Have you ever been wrong about anything?Probably.
However I am pretty certain that atomic bombs are a hoax and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by napalm 1945. I am also pretty certain that Yuri Gagarin never orbited Earth April 1961 and that no humans have ever been in space. And I know for certain that stormy weather didn't knock off the bow visor of M/V Estonia September 1994 in the Baltic sea. That is when I was first accused of being a conspiracy theorist.
And this 911 show 2001 with three skyscrapers collapsing at NY caused by Arabs and an Egyptian was produced in-house USA. And finally this fusion on Earth 2035 project down the road from me is complete nonsense. It will never work.
Just prove me wrong about any of these five events and collect €1M! http://heiwaco.com
Also, what does pretty certain mean? It seems you're allowing for the possibility, however small, that you might be wrong?
I am pretty certain that you suffer from cognitive dissonance! Ever heard about it?
Also, what are some things you've been wrong about?
What things have I been wrong about?
When I was small I was afraid of atomic bombs, because I was told they were dangerous, etc. I was wrong. I was just lied to. Then I was told people had visited space and I believed it too, until I realized I was wrong. The people in question were just lying actors. But to keep everyone happy I agreed that atomic bombs and people in space were fantastic. I was a victim of cognitive dissonance!
The cure of cognitive dissonance is simple. Just check the facts.
Before you were 100% certain. Now you "have a feeling". What happened to lower your confidence levels?I explain it at http://heiwashorseshit.com .How can you be so certain? What if you're wrong? After all, you've been wrong before!Sorry, I am 100% certain you suffer from cognitive dissonance! No doubt about it.Why do you say "pretty certain" when what you mean is "certain"?I use the word pretty adverbially to mean fairly or moderately. I use certain to mean there is no doubt about it. So there is no chance that I am wrong about any of the five events I mention at http://heiwashorseshit.com - my popular website.Can you mention a few things you've been wrong about?Have you ever been wrong about anything?Probably.
However I am pretty certain that atomic bombs are a hoax and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by napalm 1945. I am also pretty certain that Yuri Gagarin never orbited Earth April 1961 and that no humans have ever been in space. And I know for certain that stormy weather didn't knock off the bow visor of M/V Estonia September 1994 in the Baltic sea. That is when I was first accused of being a conspiracy theorist.
And this 911 show 2001 with three skyscrapers collapsing at NY caused by Arabs and an Egyptian was produced in-house USA. And finally this fusion on Earth 2035 project down the road from me is complete nonsense. It will never work.
Just prove me wrong about any of these five events and collect €1M! http://heiwashorseshit.com
Also, what does pretty certain mean? It seems you're allowing for the possibility, however small, that you might be wrong?
I am pretty certain that you suffer from cognitive dissonance! Ever heard about it?
Also, what are some things you've been wrong about?
What things have I been wrong about?
When I was small I was afraid of atomic bombs, because I was told they were dangerous, etc. I was wrong. I was just lied to. Then I was told people had visited space and I believed it too, until I realized I was wrong. The people in question were just lying actors. But to keep everyone happy I agreed that atomic bombs and people in space were fantastic. I was a victim of cognitive dissonance!
The cure of cognitive dissonance is simple. Just check the facts.
Example - three governments - Estonia, Finland and Sweden - have stated 1994 that a ship lost its bow visor in a stormy dark night and sank. Nobody heard or felt it aboard, when the waves knocked off the bow visor. Operating identical ships I tested the theory myself, i.e. in a storm B10 with big waves we increased speed to test the bow visor. As expected a big wave impacted the bow visor. The noise was 130dB like being hit by thunder and the vibrations were felt by everyone. But the bow visor was OK. So three governments - Estonia, Finland and Sweden - invented a false story 1994 to cover up what really happened. The ship was sunk by sabotage. I informed concerned parties and ... they were not happy.
The visor was secretly removed from the wreck at the bottom of the sea by military forces. Etc, etc. It is very easy to invent false stories and make people believe them.
Same with the a-bombs 1945 and manned space travel 1961.
I have a feeling you suffer from cognitive dissonance. But you are not alone.
Re a-bombs 1945, manned space travel 1961 and lost bow visors 1994 I am 100% certain they are all hoaxes invented by sick governments as explained at my website.Before you were 100% certain. Now you "have a feeling". What happened to lower your confidence levels?I explain it at http://heiwashorseshit.com .How can you be so certain? What if you're wrong? After all, you've been wrong before!Sorry, I am 100% certain you suffer from cognitive dissonance! No doubt about it.Why do you say "pretty certain" when what you mean is "certain"?I use the word pretty adverbially to mean fairly or moderately. I use certain to mean there is no doubt about it. So there is no chance that I am wrong about any of the five events I mention at http://heiwashorseshit.com - my popular website.Can you mention a few things you've been wrong about?Have you ever been wrong about anything?Probably.
However I am pretty certain that atomic bombs are a hoax and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by napalm 1945. I am also pretty certain that Yuri Gagarin never orbited Earth April 1961 and that no humans have ever been in space. And I know for certain that stormy weather didn't knock off the bow visor of M/V Estonia September 1994 in the Baltic sea. That is when I was first accused of being a conspiracy theorist.
And this 911 show 2001 with three skyscrapers collapsing at NY caused by Arabs and an Egyptian was produced in-house USA. And finally this fusion on Earth 2035 project down the road from me is complete nonsense. It will never work.
Just prove me wrong about any of these five events and collect €1M! http://heiwashorseshit.com
Also, what does pretty certain mean? It seems you're allowing for the possibility, however small, that you might be wrong?
I am pretty certain that you suffer from cognitive dissonance! Ever heard about it?
Also, what are some things you've been wrong about?
What things have I been wrong about?
When I was small I was afraid of atomic bombs, because I was told they were dangerous, etc. I was wrong. I was just lied to. Then I was told people had visited space and I believed it too, until I realized I was wrong. The people in question were just lying actors. But to keep everyone happy I agreed that atomic bombs and people in space were fantastic. I was a victim of cognitive dissonance!
The cure of cognitive dissonance is simple. Just check the facts.
Example - three governments - Estonia, Finland and Sweden - have stated 1994 that a ship lost its bow visor in a stormy dark night and sank. Nobody heard or felt it aboard, when the waves knocked off the bow visor. Operating identical ships I tested the theory myself, i.e. in a storm B10 with big waves we increased speed to test the bow visor. As expected a big wave impacted the bow visor. The noise was 130dB like being hit by thunder and the vibrations were felt by everyone. But the bow visor was OK. So three governments - Estonia, Finland and Sweden - invented a false story 1994 to cover up what really happened. The ship was sunk by sabotage. I informed concerned parties and ... they were not happy.
The visor was secretly removed from the wreck at the bottom of the sea by military forces. Etc, etc. It is very easy to invent false stories and make people believe them.
Same with the a-bombs 1945 and manned space travel 1961.
I have a feeling you suffer from cognitive dissonance. But you are not alone.
Before you were 100% certain. Now you "have a feeling". What happened to lower your confidence levels?Not knowing you apart from your posts I just have a feeling you suffer from cognitive dissonance. You must yourself decide why you believe
I am 100% certain you suffer from cognitive dissonance! No doubt about it
Heiwa, apart from the musings on your website, can we find your theories anywhere else? Where else can I find documented articles on the atomic bomb fakery or the cover up of that ship that was blamed on a dodgy bow visor falling off for example?Yes, at my website I also link to many sites which support my findings. I also link to sites with ridiculous info to the contrary. You really have to study what I write at my site.
Heiwa, apart from the musings on your website, can we find your theories anywhere else? Where else can I find documented articles on the atomic bomb fakery or the cover up of that ship that was blamed on a dodgy bow visor falling off for example?Yes, at my website I also link to many sites which support my findings. I also link to sites with ridiculous info to the contrary. You really have to study what I write at my site.
OK, I am 100% certain that I have a feeling that you suffer from cognitive dissonance. I really feel sorry for you for it. No doubt about it.Before you were 100% certain. Now you "have a feeling". What happened to lower your confidence levels?Not knowing you apart from your posts I just have a feeling you suffer from cognitive dissonance. You must yourself decide why you believe
OK. But if that's the case, why did you post this?:I am 100% certain you suffer from cognitive dissonance! No doubt about it
I have no idea about your boss. Why do you ask such a stupid question?Heiwa, apart from the musings on your website, can we find your theories anywhere else? Where else can I find documented articles on the atomic bomb fakery or the cover up of that ship that was blamed on a dodgy bow visor falling off for example?Yes, at my website I also link to many sites which support my findings. I also link to sites with ridiculous info to the contrary. You really have to study what I write at my site.
www.ratemypoo.com doesn't seem like it's safe for work. Are you sure I wont get in trouble from my boss for going there?
I have no idea about your boss. Why do you ask such a stupid question?Heiwa, apart from the musings on your website, can we find your theories anywhere else? Where else can I find documented articles on the atomic bomb fakery or the cover up of that ship that was blamed on a dodgy bow visor falling off for example?Yes, at my website I also link to many sites which support my findings. I also link to sites with ridiculous info to the contrary. You really have to study what I write at my site.
www.ratemypoo.com doesn't seem like it's safe for work. Are you sure I wont get in trouble from my boss for going there?
Did you just modify your quote to make it look like you had said that earlier? I thought you were always honest?OK, I am 100% certain that I have a feeling that you suffer from cognitive dissonance. I really feel sorry for you for it. No doubt about it.Before you were 100% certain. Now you "have a feeling". What happened to lower your confidence levels?Not knowing you apart from your posts I just have a feeling you suffer from cognitive dissonance. You must yourself decide why you believe
OK. But if that's the case, why did you post this?:I am 100% certain you suffer from cognitive dissonance! No doubt about it
??? My http://heiwaco.com is very popular - 100's downloads/day. No risks whatsoever.I have no idea about your boss. Why do you ask such a stupid question?Heiwa, apart from the musings on your website, can we find your theories anywhere else? Where else can I find documented articles on the atomic bomb fakery or the cover up of that ship that was blamed on a dodgy bow visor falling off for example?Yes, at my website I also link to many sites which support my findings. I also link to sites with ridiculous info to the contrary. You really have to study what I write at my site.
www.ratemypoo.com doesn't seem like it's safe for work. Are you sure I wont get in trouble from my boss for going there?
Because the content of your site may be "NSFW" (not safe for work). In other words, if someone sees me perusing your website while at work I can get in loads of trouble. Looking at porn would be easier to explain than looking at shit
Hello heiwa.Hello brother.....
I wonder your thoughts about chemtrails, friendly asking. Who and why do this?
If you don't answer this question, I'll announce you as to be rabinoz the biggest liar on the world.
I want two honest answers from you:
1- What is your thought about chemtrails?
2- What is your thought about rabinoz.
Did you just modify your quote to make it look like you had said that earlier? I thought you were always honest?OK, I am 100% certain that I have a feeling that you suffer from cognitive dissonance. I really feel sorry for you for it. No doubt about it.Before you were 100% certain. Now you "have a feeling". What happened to lower your confidence levels?Not knowing you apart from your posts I just have a feeling you suffer from cognitive dissonance. You must yourself decide why you believe
OK. But if that's the case, why did you post this?:I am 100% certain you suffer from cognitive dissonance! No doubt about it
Sorry, I am 100% certain you suffer from cognitive dissonance! No doubt about it.You have the audacity to take in on yourself to
Sorry, I am 100% certain you suffer from cognitive dissonance! No doubt about it.You have the audacity to take in on yourself to
diagnose psychological condition over the internet without any qualifications in psychology or psychiatry,
with the consent of the subject and
then release this information to the public without the written consent of the subject.
Does anyone know how many laws have been broken and how much in damages the victim might expect in a civil suit against both of:
Anders Björkman personally and the company Heiwa Co, under whose name Anders Björkman posts here?
Any lawyers here that can take on a case pro bono for the usual 30%?
I just asked a fewYes, please go ahead as suggested.Sorry, I am 100% certain you suffer from cognitive dissonance! No doubt about it.You have the audacity to take in on yourself to
diagnose psychological condition over the internet without any qualifications in psychology or psychiatry,
with the consent of the subject and
then release this information to the public without the written consent of the subject.
Does anyone know how many laws have been broken and how much in damages the victim might expect in a civil suit against both of:
Anders Björkman personally and the company Heiwa Co, under whose name Anders Björkman posts here?
Any lawyers here that can take on a case pro bono for the usual 30%?
Yes, just go ahead and ask. I look forward to any answers.I just asked a fewYes, please go ahead as suggested.Sorry, I am 100% certain you suffer from cognitive dissonance! No doubt about it.You have the audacity to take in on yourself to
diagnose psychological condition over the internet without any qualifications in psychology or psychiatry,
with the consent of the subject and
then release this information to the public without the written consent of the subject.
Does anyone know how many laws have been broken and how much in damages the victim might expect in a civil suit against both of:
Anders Björkman personally and the company Heiwa Co, under whose name Anders Björkman posts here?
Any lawyers here that can take on a case pro bono for the usual 30%?impertinent questions. ;D
Did you just modify your quote to make it look like you had said that earlier? I thought you were always honest?OK, I am 100% certain that I have a feeling that you suffer from cognitive dissonance. I really feel sorry for you for it. No doubt about it.Before you were 100% certain. Now you "have a feeling". What happened to lower your confidence levels?Not knowing you apart from your posts I just have a feeling you suffer from cognitive dissonance. You must yourself decide why you believe
OK. But if that's the case, why did you post this?:I am 100% certain you suffer from cognitive dissonance! No doubt about it
What quote? That you suffer from cognitive dissonance? I honestly think you do. Most twerps do.Did you just modify your quote to make it look like you had said that earlier? I thought you were always honest?OK, I am 100% certain that I have a feeling that you suffer from cognitive dissonance. I really feel sorry for you for it. No doubt about it.Before you were 100% certain. Now you "have a feeling". What happened to lower your confidence levels?Not knowing you apart from your posts I just have a feeling you suffer from cognitive dissonance. You must yourself decide why you believe
OK. But if that's the case, why did you post this?:I am 100% certain you suffer from cognitive dissonance! No doubt about it
Hey HeiwaThanks for asking. Explain what a bad thing is. Are you a bad thing? Or just a twerp? Or both?
Why do bad things happen?
Hey HeiwaThanks for asking. Explain what a bad thing is. Are you a bad thing? Or just a twerp? Or both?
Why do bad things happen?
Hey HeiwaThanks for asking. Explain what a bad thing is. Are you a bad thing? Or just a twerp? Or both?
Why do bad things happen?
I am a good thing
Read the news someday. Wars. Murder, etc. Why do people commit such horrible acts? Would people's lives not be enriched by working together and doing good? I see no benefit to evil or selfishness. So why do bad things happen?
Wars don't happen. it's all propaganda. A giant hoax!Hey HeiwaThanks for asking. Explain what a bad thing is. Are you a bad thing? Or just a twerp? Or both?
Why do bad things happen?
I am a good thing
Read the news someday. Wars. Murder, etc. Why do people commit such horrible acts? Would people's lives not be enriched by working together and doing good? I see no benefit to evil or selfishness. So why do bad things happen?
I agree war is a bad thing and that crazy people starts wars. And I read the news every day. At my website http://heiwashorseshit.com I comment on some current events, which apparently upsets people.
Wars don't happen. it's all propaganda. A giant hoax!Hey HeiwaThanks for asking. Explain what a bad thing is. Are you a bad thing? Or just a twerp? Or both?
Why do bad things happen?
I am a good thing
Read the news someday. Wars. Murder, etc. Why do people commit such horrible acts? Would people's lives not be enriched by working together and doing good? I see no benefit to evil or selfishness. So why do bad things happen?
I agree war is a bad thing and that crazy people starts wars. And I read the news every day. At my website http://heiwashorseshit.com I comment on some current events, which apparently upsets people.
Why do you say wars happen? Do you like the idea of people getting shot at and bombed and killed? You must be twerp!
No, I am neither a twerp nor a guttersnipe. I am a professional engineer - http://heiwaco.com/cv.htm .Wars don't happen. it's all propaganda. A giant hoax!Hey HeiwaThanks for asking. Explain what a bad thing is. Are you a bad thing? Or just a twerp? Or both?
Why do bad things happen?
I am a good thing
Read the news someday. Wars. Murder, etc. Why do people commit such horrible acts? Would people's lives not be enriched by working together and doing good? I see no benefit to evil or selfishness. So why do bad things happen?
I agree war is a bad thing and that crazy people starts wars. And I read the news every day. At my website http://heiwashorseshit.com I comment on some current events, which apparently upsets people.
Why do you say wars happen? Do you like the idea of people getting shot at and bombed and killed? You must be twerp!
Heiwa is this true?? Are you a twerp? With so many people calling you a twerp, they cant all be wrong.
Also what is worse. A twerp or a guttersnipe?
No, I am neither a twerp nor a guttersnipe. I am a professional engineer - http://heiwaco.com/cv.htm .Wars don't happen. it's all propaganda. A giant hoax!Hey HeiwaThanks for asking. Explain what a bad thing is. Are you a bad thing? Or just a twerp? Or both?
Why do bad things happen?
I am a good thing
Read the news someday. Wars. Murder, etc. Why do people commit such horrible acts? Would people's lives not be enriched by working together and doing good? I see no benefit to evil or selfishness. So why do bad things happen?
I agree war is a bad thing and that crazy people starts wars. And I read the news every day. At my website http://heiwashorseshit.com I comment on some current events, which apparently upsets people.
Why do you say wars happen? Do you like the idea of people getting shot at and bombed and killed? You must be twerp!
Heiwa is this true?? Are you a twerp? With so many people calling you a twerp, they cant all be wrong.
Also what is worse. A twerp or a guttersnipe?
And I haven't heard anyone calling me a twerp or a guttersnipe. I call plenty people twerps or guttersnipes. They call me an idiot, bla, bla, bla, etc, etc. Actually I was called it already August 1996 by some Swedish government spokespeople, when I showed that Estonia, Finland and Sweden were conspiring to hide the real cause of the M/S Estonia incident 1994. This case is still going on.
I haven't heard anyone calling me a twerp or a guttersnipe
No, I am neither a twerp nor a guttersnipe. I am a professional engineer - http://heiwaco.com/cv.htm .Wars don't happen. it's all propaganda. A giant hoax!Hey HeiwaThanks for asking. Explain what a bad thing is. Are you a bad thing? Or just a twerp? Or both?
Why do bad things happen?
I am a good thing
Read the news someday. Wars. Murder, etc. Why do people commit such horrible acts? Would people's lives not be enriched by working together and doing good? I see no benefit to evil or selfishness. So why do bad things happen?
I agree war is a bad thing and that crazy people starts wars. And I read the news every day. At my website http://heiwashorseshit.com I comment on some current events, which apparently upsets people.
Why do you say wars happen? Do you like the idea of people getting shot at and bombed and killed? You must be twerp!
Heiwa is this true?? Are you a twerp? With so many people calling you a twerp, they cant all be wrong.
Also what is worse. A twerp or a guttersnipe?
And I haven't heard anyone calling me a twerp or a guttersnipe. I call plenty people twerps or guttersnipes. They call me an idiot, bla, bla, bla, etc, etc. Actually I was called it already August 1996 by some Swedish government spokespeople, when I showed that Estonia, Finland and Sweden were conspiring to hide the real cause of the M/S Estonia incident 1994. This case is still going on.
Are you lying to me Heiwa? That isn't very nice. Everyone here thinks you are a twerp and/or guttersnipe. In fact, I'll even start a poll. We can see if you are right or wrong. If just one person thinks you are a twerp, you are a proven liar and fraud as evidenced by this statementQuoteI haven't heard anyone calling me a twerp or a guttersnipe
Given Mr Gumps previous post, it does not bode well for your credibility.....
Hey Heiwa, how is your wife?
You didn't show anyone anything. You claimed it with no evidence. This is all you ever do.No, I am neither a twerp nor a guttersnipe. I am a professional engineer - http://heiwaco.com/cv.htm .Wars don't happen. it's all propaganda. A giant hoax!Hey HeiwaThanks for asking. Explain what a bad thing is. Are you a bad thing? Or just a twerp? Or both?
Why do bad things happen?
I am a good thing
Read the news someday. Wars. Murder, etc. Why do people commit such horrible acts? Would people's lives not be enriched by working together and doing good? I see no benefit to evil or selfishness. So why do bad things happen?
I agree war is a bad thing and that crazy people starts wars. And I read the news every day. At my website http://heiwashorseshit.com I comment on some current events, which apparently upsets people.
Why do you say wars happen? Do you like the idea of people getting shot at and bombed and killed? You must be twerp!
Heiwa is this true?? Are you a twerp? With so many people calling you a twerp, they cant all be wrong.
Also what is worse. A twerp or a guttersnipe?
And I haven't heard anyone calling me a twerp or a guttersnipe. I call plenty people twerps or guttersnipes. They call me an idiot, bla, bla, bla, etc, etc. Actually I was called it already August 1996 by some Swedish government spokespeople, when I showed that Estonia, Finland and Sweden were conspiring to hide the real cause of the M/S Estonia incident 1994. This case is still going on.
No, you are. Please make an effort and study my website http://heiwaco.comYou didn't show anyone anything. You claimed it with no evidence. This is all you ever do.No, I am neither a twerp nor a guttersnipe. I am a professional engineer - http://heiwaco.com/cv.htm .Wars don't happen. it's all propaganda. A giant hoax!Hey HeiwaThanks for asking. Explain what a bad thing is. Are you a bad thing? Or just a twerp? Or both?
Why do bad things happen?
I am a good thing
Read the news someday. Wars. Murder, etc. Why do people commit such horrible acts? Would people's lives not be enriched by working together and doing good? I see no benefit to evil or selfishness. So why do bad things happen?
I agree war is a bad thing and that crazy people starts wars. And I read the news every day. At my website http://heiwashorseshit.com I comment on some current events, which apparently upsets people.
Why do you say wars happen? Do you like the idea of people getting shot at and bombed and killed? You must be twerp!
Heiwa is this true?? Are you a twerp? With so many people calling you a twerp, they cant all be wrong.
Also what is worse. A twerp or a guttersnipe?
And I haven't heard anyone calling me a twerp or a guttersnipe. I call plenty people twerps or guttersnipes. They call me an idiot, bla, bla, bla, etc, etc. Actually I was called it already August 1996 by some Swedish government spokespeople, when I showed that Estonia, Finland and Sweden were conspiring to hide the real cause of the M/S Estonia incident 1994. This case is still going on.
You are a failure.
No, you are. Please make an effort and study my websiteI'm sorry but studying your website requires too far much effort for far too little reward.
Fail. I've seen your shitty website. No evidence there. Please make the effort to post your evidence here, where you make the claims.No, you are. Please make an effort and study my website http://heiwaco.comYou didn't show anyone anything. You claimed it with no evidence. This is all you ever do.No, I am neither a twerp nor a guttersnipe. I am a professional engineer - http://heiwaco.com/cv.htm .Wars don't happen. it's all propaganda. A giant hoax!Hey HeiwaThanks for asking. Explain what a bad thing is. Are you a bad thing? Or just a twerp? Or both?
Why do bad things happen?
I am a good thing
Read the news someday. Wars. Murder, etc. Why do people commit such horrible acts? Would people's lives not be enriched by working together and doing good? I see no benefit to evil or selfishness. So why do bad things happen?
I agree war is a bad thing and that crazy people starts wars. And I read the news every day. At my website http://heiwashorseshit.com I comment on some current events, which apparently upsets people.
Why do you say wars happen? Do you like the idea of people getting shot at and bombed and killed? You must be twerp!
Heiwa is this true?? Are you a twerp? With so many people calling you a twerp, they cant all be wrong.
Also what is worse. A twerp or a guttersnipe?
And I haven't heard anyone calling me a twerp or a guttersnipe. I call plenty people twerps or guttersnipes. They call me an idiot, bla, bla, bla, etc, etc. Actually I was called it already August 1996 by some Swedish government spokespeople, when I showed that Estonia, Finland and Sweden were conspiring to hide the real cause of the M/S Estonia incident 1994. This case is still going on.
You are a failure.
Thanks for visiting http://heiwaco.com . Only twerps do not find any evidence there of what I say.Fail. I've seen your shitty website. No evidence there. Please make the effort to post your evidence here, where you make the claims.No, you are. Please make an effort and study my website http://heiwaco.comYou didn't show anyone anything. You claimed it with no evidence. This is all you ever do.No, I am neither a twerp nor a guttersnipe. I am a professional engineer - http://heiwaco.com/cv.htm .Wars don't happen. it's all propaganda. A giant hoax!Hey HeiwaThanks for asking. Explain what a bad thing is. Are you a bad thing? Or just a twerp? Or both?
Why do bad things happen?
I am a good thing
Read the news someday. Wars. Murder, etc. Why do people commit such horrible acts? Would people's lives not be enriched by working together and doing good? I see no benefit to evil or selfishness. So why do bad things happen?
I agree war is a bad thing and that crazy people starts wars. And I read the news every day. At my website http://heiwashorseshit.com I comment on some current events, which apparently upsets people.
Why do you say wars happen? Do you like the idea of people getting shot at and bombed and killed? You must be twerp!
Heiwa is this true?? Are you a twerp? With so many people calling you a twerp, they cant all be wrong.
Also what is worse. A twerp or a guttersnipe?
And I haven't heard anyone calling me a twerp or a guttersnipe. I call plenty people twerps or guttersnipes. They call me an idiot, bla, bla, bla, etc, etc. Actually I was called it already August 1996 by some Swedish government spokespeople, when I showed that Estonia, Finland and Sweden were conspiring to hide the real cause of the M/S Estonia incident 1994. This case is still going on.
You are a failure.
Of course you will fail.
Anders, do you ever believe anything that someone tells you?Yes, after checking what I am told. It is normal. Why do you ask such a stupid question. I know you are a twerp but why don't you just shut up and piss off?
Anders, do you ever believe anything that someone tells you?Yes, after checking what I am told. It is normal. Why do you ask such a stupid question. I know you are a twerp but why don't you just shut up and piss off?
Liar. Just more failure. Prove me wrong, post some of your evidence here.Thanks for visiting http://heiwaco.com . Only twerps do not find any evidence there of what I say.Fail. I've seen your shitty website. No evidence there. Please make the effort to post your evidence here, where you make the claims.No, you are. Please make an effort and study my website http://heiwaco.comYou didn't show anyone anything. You claimed it with no evidence. This is all you ever do.No, I am neither a twerp nor a guttersnipe. I am a professional engineer - http://heiwaco.com/cv.htm .Wars don't happen. it's all propaganda. A giant hoax!Hey HeiwaThanks for asking. Explain what a bad thing is. Are you a bad thing? Or just a twerp? Or both?
Why do bad things happen?
I am a good thing
Read the news someday. Wars. Murder, etc. Why do people commit such horrible acts? Would people's lives not be enriched by working together and doing good? I see no benefit to evil or selfishness. So why do bad things happen?
I agree war is a bad thing and that crazy people starts wars. And I read the news every day. At my website http://heiwashorseshit.com I comment on some current events, which apparently upsets people.
Why do you say wars happen? Do you like the idea of people getting shot at and bombed and killed? You must be twerp!
Heiwa is this true?? Are you a twerp? With so many people calling you a twerp, they cant all be wrong.
Also what is worse. A twerp or a guttersnipe?
And I haven't heard anyone calling me a twerp or a guttersnipe. I call plenty people twerps or guttersnipes. They call me an idiot, bla, bla, bla, etc, etc. Actually I was called it already August 1996 by some Swedish government spokespeople, when I showed that Estonia, Finland and Sweden were conspiring to hide the real cause of the M/S Estonia incident 1994. This case is still going on.
You are a failure.
Of course you will fail.
Then why don't you believe anyone who says that manned space flight is real and nuclear weapons work as advertised?Anders, do you ever believe anything that someone tells you?Yes, after checking what I am told. It is normal.
Why do you ask such a stupid question.I ask because you don't seem to believe anything that anyone here says.
I know you are a twerp but why don't you just shut up and piss off?Why are you so grumpy? Do you need to take a nap?
I'm writing my thesis on flat earth findings. Would you recommend I lead with the zetetic method or disprove round earth? In your experience, what is more effective?
I want to ask about your wife. Is it ok?