I don't believe in the dome theory. However, plenty of people have reported seeing the ice covered Rim Continent that roundies like to call the "Ice Wall". Is this what you are referring to in the OP?
Don't you really mean that you "flatties" like to call the "The Ice Wall":
The Ice Wall
The figure of 24,900 miles is the diameter of the known world; the area which the light from the sun affects. Along the edge of our local area exists a massive 150 foot Ice Wall. The 150 foot Ice Wall is on the coast of Antarctica. It is widely known and widely studied. The Ice Wall is a massive wall of ice that surrounds Antarctica. The shelf of ice is several hundred meters thick. This nearly vertical ice front to the open sea is more than 50 meters high above the water's surface.
The Ice Wall was discovered by Sir James Clark Ross, a polar explorer who was among the first to venture to Antarctica in an attempt to determine the position of the South Magnetic Pole.
::) Or are you claiming the those dastardly globulists wrote your Wiki? ::)
No, surely we don't rely on non-empirical evidence as such a thing does not exist. All knowledge flows from the font of our senses.
All evidence is empirical. It always has been, and it always will be. There is no other way for evidence to be.
This is the Flat Earth explanation of the lunar eclipse:
The Lunar Eclipse
A Lunar Eclipse occurs about twice a year when a satellite of the sun passes between the sun and moon.
This satellite is called the Shadow Object. Its orbital plane is tilted at an angle of about 5°10' to the sun's orbital plane, making eclipses possible only when the three bodies (Sun, Object, and Moon) are aligned and when the moon is crossing the sun's orbital plane (at a point called the node).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
It is estimated that the Shadow Object is around five to ten miles in diameter. Since it is somewhat close to the sun the manifestation of its penumbra upon the moon appears as a magnified projection.
Tom Bishop (of T F E S "fame") and you seem to claim that the Flat Earth is based on evidence.
Now, apart from the Lunar Eclipse explanation being ridiculous, please tell us what evidence there is for:
(1) the existence of "shadow object",
(2) the orbital plane of the "shadow object" being tilted at an angle of about 5°10' to the sun's orbital plane and
(3) how the "shadow object" was even estimated to be around five to ten miles in diameter.
To me (1) and (3) seem as though they had to be pure guesses, while (2) is simply "borrowed" from the real moon's orbital inclination, without any pretense at justification, let alone evidence.
Your explanation would be appreciated!