The Flat Earth Society
Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth Q&A => Topic started by: 11cookeaw1 on June 20, 2011, 04:58:22 AM
-
In FE, the maximum distance something is visible should increase linearly with distance, because according to Rowbotham you can't see objects as they get further because they become to small. In round earth theory the distance is proportional to the square root of the height... so according to FE mount everest should be visible for thousands and thousands of kilometers.
-
in b4 atmospheric distortion/blurryness or whatever
-
(http://cloud.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/smog-infinite-wilderness_1.jpg)
...any other questions?
-
in b4 atmospheric distortion/blurryness or whatever
Round earthers and flat earthers alike can agree that atmospheric distortion/blurryness or whatever is quite real.
-
or whatever
You mean land topography? Why does no one consider this?
-
In FE, the maximum distance something is visible should increase linearly with distance, because according to Rowbotham you can't see objects as they get further because they become to small. In round earth theory the distance is proportional to the square root of the height... so according to FE mount everest should be visible for thousands and thousands of kilometers.
There are a couple of reasons. First of all, due to atmoplanar distortion, it will fade. Second, it is a well known phenomenon that objects appear smaller when farther away. Thus, it can be hidden behind things.