The Flat Earth Society
Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth General => Topic started by: steveo66443 on October 04, 2009, 05:55:16 AM
-
In frequently asked questions you say there is no "conclusive evidence" to support that the world is a globe, I would like to see your conclusive evidence and no, maps and Mr James McIntyre's models do not fall under conclusive evidence. And if cannot provide the evidence where did you get your information from and further more how can you prove that the earth is not a globe.
-
Read "Earth Not a Globe" by Samuel Rowboatham. There is a copy free online. (http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/za00.htm)
Also, since the earth appears flat from out local area, we assume it is flat until sufficient evidence is given otherwise.
-
the countless photos from space and satellites are still not enough to convince you, you arrogant fools?
-
In frequently asked questions you say there is no "conclusive evidence" to support that the world is a globe, I would like to see your conclusive evidence and no, maps and Mr James McIntyre's models do not fall under conclusive evidence. And if cannot provide the evidence where did you get your information from and further more how can you prove that the earth is not a globe.
They have none. ;D
-
the countless photos from space and satellites are still not enough to convince you, you arrogant fools?
I have countless photos of dragons, but I still can't ride a flying, fire breathing monster, now can I?
-
the countless photos from space and satellites are still not enough to convince you, you arrogant fools?
I have countless photos of dragons, but I still can't ride a flying, fire breathing monster, now can I?
Too bad you don't have 'photos' of dragons.
-
you have drawings or paintings of dragons i'm sure. look up the difference between them and photograph before you try to make an intelligent comment.
-
the countless photos from space and satellites are still not enough to convince you, you arrogant fools?
I have countless photos of dragons, but I still can't ride a flying, fire breathing monster, now can I?
Too bad you don't have 'photos' of dragons.
http://images.google.com/images?q=dragon&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi
These are just as authentic as the "photos" produced by NASA.
-
the countless photos from space and satellites are still not enough to convince you, you arrogant fools?
I have countless photos of dragons, but I still can't ride a flying, fire breathing monster, now can I?
Too bad you don't have 'photos' of dragons.
http://images.google.com/images?q=dragon&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi
These are just as authentic as the "photos" produced by NASA.
Nope. Not at all.
-
those are drawings, paintings, computer generated images which have absolutely no truth to them at all, which is a fact. your opinion is that the NASA photos are fake, and you really have no substantiated proof of such
-
those are drawings, paintings, computer generated images which have absolutely no truth to them at all, which is a fact.
your opinion is that the dragon photos are fake, and you really have no substantiated proof of such
-
oh clever you, i absolutely love your wittiness. again, those are not photographs in case you forgot from elementary school, here is a definition of a photograph.
pho?to?graph (ft-grf)
n.
An image, especially a positive print, recorded by a camera and reproduced on a photosensitive surface.
v. pho?to?graphed, pho?to?graph?ing, pho?to?graphs
v.tr.
To take a photograph of.
v.intr.
1. To practice photography.
2. To be the subject for photographs: She photographs well.
photo?grapha?ble adj.
pho?togra?pher (f-tgr-fr) n.
-
What if I take a picture of them while they're on my computer screen? Then I can develop them and they will fit that definition of "photograph".
-
i shall then rephrase. get a camera, go out to a dragon's lair and take a picture, with your camera, of the Dragon. then i may believe your comments have some validity.
-
i shall then rephrase. get a camera, go out to a dragon's lair and take a picture, with your camera, of the Dragon. then i may believe your comments have some validity.
I did, here you go.
(http://www.lucylearns.com/images/free-dragon-picture-cute-dragons-cartoon-dragon-picture-1.gif)
-
stop being a smartass and instead provide real arguments that don't make you seem like a mental deficient.
-
stop being a smartass and instead provide real arguments that don't make you seem like a mental deficient.
Oh, sweet irony.
-
stop being a smartass and instead provide real arguments that don't make you seem like a mental deficient.
You tell me to take a picture of a dragon, I show you a picture of a dragon. My dragon picture is just as authentic as NASA's pictures.
-
i told you to take a photograph of a dragon, that is a computer generated image. can you actually understand the difference??
-
I never said anything to the contrary. My dragon picture is still just as authentic as NASA's.
-
as of right now, the NASA bullshit is irrelevant. provide me with a PHOTOGRAPH of a dragon, not an image that is either drawn, painted, generated on a computer, or any other method that is not taken from a camera.
-
Ok, I took a picture of my screen. Now are dragons real?
-
agai, stop being a smartass. provide me with a photograph of a real, live dragon that you took yourself whilst in the company of a dragon
-
agai, stop being a smartass. provide me with a photograph of a real, live dragon that you took yourself whilst in the company of a dragon
I did, here you go.
(http://www.lucylearns.com/images/free-dragon-picture-cute-dragons-cartoon-dragon-picture-1.gif)
-
How about an eyewitness account? I saw two dragons yesterday.
-
ah and the ridiculousness continues. if you actually think that your dragon image is a photograph, then it is as much a photograph as this is:
http://www.ezmuseum.com/images/salvadordali.jpg
-
ah and the ridiculousness continues. if you actually think that your dragon image is a photograph, then it is as much a photograph as this is:
http://www.ezmuseum.com/images/salvadordali.jpg
So you would agree that photographs, in themselves, prove nothing?
-
the countless photos from space and satellites are still not enough to convince you, you arrogant fools?
I have countless photos of dragons, but I still can't ride a flying, fire breathing monster, now can I?
Too bad you don't have 'photos' of dragons.
http://images.google.com/images?q=dragon&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi
These are just as authentic as the "photos" produced by NASA.
Not all dragons are of the flying, fire breathing type (from your link):
(http://animals.nationalgeographic.com/staticfiles/NGS/Shared/StaticFiles/animals/images/primary/komodo-dragon.jpg)
-
Not all dragons are of the flying, fire breathing type (from your link):
(http://animals.nationalgeographic.com/staticfiles/NGS/Shared/StaticFiles/animals/images/primary/komodo-dragon.jpg)
Yep, those look just like the ones I saw Saturday. I was extremely disappointed about the missing wings.
-
Not all dragons are of the flying, fire breathing type (from your link):
Yep, those look just like the ones I saw Saturday. I was extremely disappointed about the missing wings.
Chinese dragons generally don't have wings either.
(http://scrapetv.com/News/News%20Pages/Everyone%20Else/images/chinese-dragon-red.jpg)
-
ah and the ridiculousness continues. if you actually think that your dragon image is a photograph, then it is as much a photograph as this is:
http://www.ezmuseum.com/images/salvadordali.jpg
So you would agree that photographs, in themselves, prove nothing?
No actually, because that's not a photograph. When you're staring at your computer screen all day I guess it might be hard for you to determine the difference between fake and real.