The Flat Earth Society
Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth Q&A => Topic started by: (Alex) on September 13, 2008, 03:29:18 PM
-
Are there any pictues of the ice wall? There are pictures of other governement areas (I.e. Area 51).
-
Yes.
-
May I have some examples?
-
No. They are many. You find them.
-
(http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll232/chrissetti/icewall.jpg)
-
Why so hostile? I thought this forum was in part to help people understand Flat Earth Theory. There's no reason to be intentionally unhelpful.
-
There is when you keep asking for stuff you could easily find yourself or ask already answered questions.
-
Why so hostile? I thought this forum was in part to help people understand Flat Earth Theory. There's no reason to be intentionally unhelpful.
Sorry, you asked for a picture, I gave you one. Do you tell the shopkeeper he's unhelpful when he finds you a frozen chicken when you ask for a frozen chicken?
-
I guess I figured that someone who has so much evidence in favor of Flat Earth Theory would be able to produce some photos that they could validate themselves. I would rather an explanation accompany a photo instead of blindly trying to stumble through search results with no indication as to what is legitimate evidence. I 've noticed however, that when someone on this forum asks a legitimate question about Flat Earth Theory, they are verbally attacked and no answer is given. I would think that people with so much evidence would be eager to present it.
Chris: I thought it was fairly obvious who I was replying to in my last post.
-
It's a legit question, but it's in the FAQ (I think, possibly not), and if it isn't you're supposed to search.
Look here.
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=12659.0 (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=12659.0)
-
um maybe you should try searching there are about 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
threads on this topic
edit
dam general douchebag beat me to it
-
I don't understand why no one can provide clear evidence in photos instead of an obvious artist's rendering.
-
Do you think global warming could melt this ice wall?
-
Personally, I don'tbelieve in this ice wall. I doubt global warming is sufficient enough to cause this "ice wall" to melt.
-
I don't understand why no one can provide clear evidence in photos instead of an obvious artist's rendering.
What goes on inside the Sun?
-
Personally, I don't believe in this ice wall. I doubt global warming is sufficient enough to cause this "ice wall" to melt.
I wonder what would happen if I put my tongue on the wall...
-
Nuclear reactions, I believe.
Jack: Lol. Don't expect to find out any time soon. : )
-
Nuclear reactions, I believe.
Provide pictures of this, please.
-
Sunspots: http://personal.eunet.fi/pp/tilmari/sunspot.jpg
And I am still waiting for the ice wall phenomena which, if I'm not mistaken, should be much easier to obserrve than nuclear reactions (which have been observed) on the sun.
-
Jack: Lol. Don't expect to find out any time soon. : )
I agree. He won't be able to find out because the wall is heavily guarded by NASA. This is also the reason why there aren't many pics of the wall.
-
So you say that NASA heavily guards an enourmous ice wall stretching around the earth, but that the general public has no idea? How does NASA recruit guards? How do they supply themselves with materials nescessary to guard the wall without the public finding out? Have absolutely none of these "guards" ever felt inclined to reveal themselves?
-
So you say that NASA heavily guards an enourmous ice wall stretching around the earth, but that the general public has no idea? How does NASA recruit guards? How do they supply themselves with materials nescessary to guard the wall without the public finding out? Have absolutely none of these "guards" ever felt inclined to reveal themselves?
If the guards reveal themselves, the public will think of them as insane people. Also NASA will probably kill them if they do. The public will not find out because anybody who goes near the ice wall will be taken out by the conspiracy.
-
So NASA, a space organisation established in 1958 that readily offers tours of its fascilities and performs public rocket launches, is at the heart of a conspiracy to keep secret from the public an earth encompasing ring of ice. The motives behind this conspiracy are not certain, but NASA, who has for some reason been allowed to exist all around the world, will kill anyone who gets near the ice wall or reveals themselves to be part of the conspiracy. The public, seemingly blind to the disappearance of those who have been killed by NASA, does not question why NASA, who has, by law, public financial records, purchases weapons and other materials for its guards. Apparently, prior to 1958, no one has ever tried to find this ice wall, nor record its exsistense.
Seems a little fishy to me.
-
So NASA, a space organisation established in 1958 that readily offers tours of its fascilities and performs public rocket launches, is at the heart of a conspiracy to keep secret from the public an earth encompasing ring of ice. The motives behind this conspiracy are not certain, but NASA, who has for some reason been allowed to exist all around the world, will kill anyone who gets near the ice wall or reveals themselves to be part of the conspiracy. The public, seemingly blind to the disappearance of those who have been killed by NASA, does not question why NASA, who has, by law, public financial records, purchases weapons and other materials for its guards. Apparently, prior to 1958, no one has ever tried to find this ice wall, nor record its exsistense.
Seems a little fishy to me.
NASA can cover up the deaths. The government is in on this too. Also the facilities that they have tours in are obviously to make more people believe the round earth theory, but really everything at the facility is fake.
-
Lol right...
What do you think NASA and the government get from this conspiracy?
-
Lol right...
What do you think NASA and the government get from this conspiracy?
NASA gets money from the government.
-
And the government gets what from this? It sounds like they're just throwing away money to NASA.
-
And the government gets what from this? It sounds like they're just throwing away money to NASA.
Exactly. The government as a whole is being duped just like the rest of us.
-
What goes on inside the Sun?
There is a fat man surrounded by levers.
-
And I am still waiting for the ice wall phenomena which, if I'm not mistaken, should be much easier to obserrve than nuclear reactions (which have been observed) on the sun.
Nuclear reactions have been observed "on" the Sun? That's news to me.
There is a fat man surrounded by levers.
Provide pictures, then.
-
I'd like to see one solid piece of evidence to back up this theroy.
(also, answer my sig)
-
Fortunately for you the answer to both questions can be found in one place! Click here. (http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/index.htm)
-
Rowbotham never adequately explains his alternative astronomy. If the Copernican theory so adequately explains planetary motions, why discard it, and what would he use in its place? What is the sun orbiting around once a day and how does it work like a spotlight, not a 'point source'? If the moon is self-luminous, what creates its phases? If gravity appears to work here on earth, why doesn't it apply to the celestial objects just a few hundred miles up?
To make his system work he had to throw out a great deal of science, including the scientific method itself, using instead what he calls a 'Zetetic' method. As far as I can see this is simply a license to employ circular reasoning (e.g., the earth is flat, hence we can see distant lighthouses, hence the earth is flat).
This isnt helping your case...
-
Rowbotham never adequately explains his alternative astronomy. If the Copernican theory so adequately explains planetary motions, why discard it, and what would he use in its place? What is the sun orbiting around once a day and how does it work like a spotlight, not a 'point source'? If the moon is self-luminous, what creates its phases? If gravity appears to work here on earth, why doesn't it apply to the celestial objects just a few hundred miles up?
To make his system work he had to throw out a great deal of science, including the scientific method itself, using instead what he calls a 'Zetetic' method. As far as I can see this is simply a license to employ circular reasoning (e.g., the earth is flat, hence we can see distant lighthouses, hence the earth is flat).
This isnt helping your case...
First of all, the points you bring up are largely valid and a good part of the reason for this site's continuing existence. But the points you refer to in your first paragraph are not part of the proof that the earth is flat, they are merely corollaries, and largely speculated upon. To take your points one by one:
The Copernican system cannot adequately describe planetary movement above a flat earth.
The sun orbits around a hub above the north pole, same as the rest of the heavenly bodies. Why is unclear although recent research suggests it may have something to do with the earth's magnetic field.
The moon is not self-luminous, Rowbotham was wrong about this. There is overwhelming evidence that it is actually reflecting light from the sun.
We are shielded from the effects of the DEF by the earth through a kind of bow shock effect.
You completely miss the point of zetetic method. There's nothing circular about Rowbotham's reasoning that the earth is flat. Your example illustrating your point is completely nonsensical.
-
Fine,
but if the earth being flat is a conspiracy, how do you know about it?
-
Click here. (http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/index.htm)
-
Stop deflecting the issue, how do you know NASA is a conspiracy?
-
Stop deflecting the issue, how do you know NASA is a conspiracy?
Because the earth is flat. And I'm not deflecting the issue, I'm answering you. ???
-
Stop deflecting the issue, how do you know NASA is a conspiracy?
Because the earth is flat. And I'm not deflecting the issue, I'm answering you. ???
Exactly. The earth is flat, therefore NASA is lying when they say it is round.
-
Prove its flat.
-
Prove its flat.
"exlplosives"?
-
You've proved that its possible for the earth to be flat, now give me solid evidence to support your theory.
EDIT: ty for the spell check :)
-
When did I prove such a thing? Have you any evidence to support your outlandish claims?
P.S. You're welcome.
-
The FE supporters have convinced me its possible for the earth to be flat.
But they have not given me any proof to show that the earth is flat.
-
The FE supporters have convinced me its possible for the earth to be flat.
But they have not given me any proof to show that the earth is flat.
And they never will, just as you will never provide any proof that it's round.
-
The FE supporters have convinced me its possible for the earth to be flat.
But they have not given me any proof to show that the earth is flat.
And they never will, just as you will never provide any proof that it's round.
Does your model of the earth rotate?
-
Only when I toss it across the yard.
-
(http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/8071/aaaaaaaaqw0.jpg)
-
(http://lh3.ggpht.com/_rdgbkHMk5uU/R7t9sMxHSYI/AAAAAAAAAn8/mOZJF1PabsQ/IMG_0777.jpg)
-
Ja :o