The Flat Earth Society
Other Discussion Boards => The Lounge => Topic started by: TheEngineer on August 23, 2008, 11:52:35 PM
-
Irony.
How is that irony?
-
Have they been shown to be so? I don't remember them being shown so. Perhaps you can quote the post in which this showing took place? Because, as far as I can tell, my equations have been shown to be correct for the FE.
-
Irony.
How is that irony?
The part you added. The failed badly part.
-
Sorry, but how is that ironic, again?
-
Sorry, but how is that ironic, again?
A dude once told me this and I'm going to tell you it, It's over your head and under your foot, don't step on it. I think thats what he said. It's a stupid way of me saying you know why. I didn't like that guy who told me that.
-
Under your what? Feet?
-
Foot
-
Are you drunk again?
-
Are you drunk again?
I crack up every time Engy posts this.
-
He's come on here a number of times drunk off his ass. You think his posts are stupid and barely qualify as English as they are, imagine him three sheets to the wind.
-
Are you drunk again?
Actually kinda. The DNC gives me a week off from school, I can drink all I want. I am trying to hide it. Still doesn't change anything. I know you peaced out when I said
It's only ironic if its true so...
Which clearly means, its only ironic if you were wrong as well. And since you claim my statement was ironic, it means you admitted you were wrong.
Added since you posted again. I had 3 pints. Its funny though, I saw you tried to claim I was drunk earlier today.
-
Which clearly means, its only ironic if you were wrong as well. And since you claim my statement was ironic, it means you admitted you were wrong.
What?
Added since you posted again. I had 3 pints.
Obviously.
-
Actually kinda. The DNC gives me a week off from school, I can drink all I want.
Democratic National Convention?
-
Which clearly means, its only ironic if you were wrong as well. And since you claim my statement was ironic, it means you admitted you were wrong.
What?
My page 27, your settings may be different.
-
So your posts can only be ironic if someone that has nothing to do with your posts is wrong?
Lay off the booze. It's killing the few brain cells you have left.
-
Actually kinda. The DNC gives me a week off from school, I can drink all I want.
Democratic National Convention?
Yes. I am off all of next week. Don't worry, I'm leaving town til wednesday. No computer access.
So your posts can only be ironic if someone that has nothing to do with your posts is wrong?
Lay off the booze. It's killing the few brain cells you have left.
No, you claimed my post was ironic which means you admited you were wrong. Then you edited your post to add No wonder you have failed so badly in this thread
when in fact you failed already. See the irony yet?
Sorry I have friends and go to the bar.
-
No, you claimed my post was ironic which means you admited you were wrong.
What? Your posts were ironic. I had nothing to do with your posts.
Sorry I have friends and go to the bar.
I have a wife and went for dinner and drinks. I can say for certain, she is better looking than your friends.
Who knew you could even fail so badly at having friends and drinking?
-
No, you claimed my post was ironic which means you admited you were wrong.
What? Your posts were ironic. I had nothing to do with your posts.
I can't help you. Go look back in this thread. I said something and then you said the exact same thing but didn't realize it. Then you claim my post was ironic. Then you preceded to admit you were wrong.
I have a wife and went for dinner and drinks. I can say for certain, she is better looking than your friends.
Who knew you even fail so badly at having friends and drinking?
I was with my friend since Elementry school and my roomate and his girlfriend. I would hope she would look better than a guy. You have posted at least one picture of your wife.
-
But we are using the same equation you used in your model.
but you are calculating the acceleration on the object incorrectly, Do this do not think about what happens in reality think about what the model states, and then ask yourself what is causing the acceleration on the object.
I don't bother with calculations because it's not my stuff but when I look at this thread I get feeling what is totally wrong with FE hypothesis. All FE people live in the world which lives and functions on RE rules and the rules work. To get some proof or some real understanding how FE world functions you must live on flat earth. And there they fail totally, they don't itself have real understanding how FE must work and so they invent all this new stuff(like EA) and assume all things(like light bending upward, acceleration an so on). Okay, they see some things that in their eyes must prove that earth is flat but it's only so far when you go out and do some real experiments and collect data some time. But they don't do that either.
-
So, after all these pages, cbarnett has still not shown where TE is wrong in his equations, same with Robby's. Sigh.
-
I can't help you. Go look back in this thread. I said something and then you said the exact same thing but didn't realize it. Then you claim my post was ironic.
That is not the part that is ironic.
I was with my friend since Elementry school and my roomate and his girlfriend. I would hope she would look better than a guy.
Like I said, you even fail at going out and drinking.
-
So, after all these pages, cbarnett has still not shown where TE is wrong in his equations, same with Robby's. Sigh.
Not really surprising, though, is it?
-
Not really surprising, though, is it?
Not really. And given the circumstances, it just increases the likelihood that he's full of it and can't back it up; another symptom of sokarulitis.
-
I can't help you. Go look back in this thread. I said something and then you said the exact same thing but didn't realize it. Then you claim my post was ironic.
That is not the part that is ironic.
It was the part where I said you were spoon fed your information and you agreed with it.
Like I said, you even fail at going out and drinking.
That sure sounds funny coming from a guy who rapes his wife.
I'm sure you would have way more fun with wifey...
Too bad she's asleep already.
But, that's never really stopped me before...
But wait there is more. I took pictures of my sent messages just for you.
(http://i331.photobucket.com/albums/l448/sokarul/GEDC0185.jpg)
(http://i331.photobucket.com/albums/l448/sokarul/GEDC0186.jpg)
You know nothing about me.
-
Holy shit I turn my back for 5 minutes and suddenly engy is apparently raping his wife and sok's posting up pictures of his mobile... what the hell is going on??!
-
Sorry if this has been answered, I read most of the thread but might have missed it.
Now, let's get back to our little experiment.
We have two big vacuum chambers, one on the RE and the other on the FE.
Both contain a mass at a mere 1m above the ground.
Both masses are released at the same time.
What happens to each mass?
Obviously in the RE model, gravity will pull it down until it hits the ground. Just like it would if you actually tried it.
However, according to the FE model it would honestly stay floating. That's because, before it's released, it has upward velocity equal to the upward velocity that the entire planet and all objects on it that aren't 'falling' have. Since there's no air resistance to pull it down (it's in a vacuum!) and inertia states that unless a force acts on the object, it'll keep its upward velocity equal to the earth. Hence, it should float!
But we both know that if you tried it, it's not gonna float. I don't happen to have a vacuum handy or anything, but I'm sure you can't deny that an object placed inside one would fall.
Anyway, sorry if this has already been stated, but I'd love to hear any arguments against this.
-
Oh dear. Learn FE please.
-
Obviously in the RE model, gravity will pull it down until it hits the ground. Just like it would if you actually tried it.
Gravity would not pull it down in RE.
. That's because, before it's released, it has upward velocity equal to the upward velocity that the entire planet and all objects on it that aren't 'falling' have.
What is the velocity of the earth, say, one second after you release the mass?
-
Oh dear. Learn FE please.
Unless FE states that there's some inexplicable force on the Earth that causes it to constantly increase in speed, I don't know what could make my analogy wrong. If there's something I'm not factoring in about FET please tell me!
-
There is an inexplicable force. The same one observed in RET.
EDIT: I don't mean gravity, I mean the one causing the rate of the universes expansion to increase, Drainy.
-
There is an inexplicable force. The same one observed in RET.
Gravity isnt a force. You should know this :P
-
Obviously in the RE model, gravity will pull it down until it hits the ground. Just like it would if you actually tried it.
Gravity would not pull it down in RE.
. That's because, before it's released, it has upward velocity equal to the upward velocity that the entire planet and all objects on it that aren't 'falling' have.
What is the velocity of the earth, say, one second after you release the mass?
Why wouldn't gravity pull it down in RE? I'm pretty sure gravity exists whether you're in a vacuum or not.
As far as I know, FE states that the velocity of earth is constant. Again, I may be incorrect in assuming this. But you're the FEr, you should know! I dunno why you're asking me.
There is an inexplicable force. The same one observed in RET.
Well played. But do FErs generally accept that the speed of Earth is constantly increasing, or is this a new concept you were just now forced to consider?
-
The first one, unless your referring to Planar Earth, which is stationary and uses gravitation.
-
I'm pretty sure gravity exists
It doesnt.
As far as I know, FE states that the velocity of earth is constant. Again, I may be incorrect in assuming this. But you're the FEr, you should know! I dunno why you're asking me.
The earth is constantly accelerating. See below. Also Im not an FEr.
Well played. But do FErs generally accept that the speed of Earth is constantly increasing, or is this a new concept you were just now forced to consider?
No. The accelerating theory has been established for some time. Though as far as I know not all FErs subscribe to it.
-
That sure sounds funny coming from a guy who rapes his wife.
You can't rape the willing.
But wait there is more. I took pictures of my sent messages just for you.
(http://i331.photobucket.com/albums/l448/sokarul/GEDC0185.jpg)
I was with my friend since Elementry school and my roomate and his girlfriend.
Watching you fail never gets old. It just keeps getting better and better.
-
I love how Sokarul feels the need to post pictures of his phone to try to convince us of... well, whatever he's trying to convince us of. Somebody's a bit insecure, I think.
-
That sure sounds funny coming from a guy who rapes his wife.
You can't rape the willing.
Yeah so when a girl at a party passes out...
But wait there is more. I took pictures of my sent messages just for you.
(http://i331.photobucket.com/albums/l448/sokarul/GEDC0185.jpg)
I was with my friend since Elementry school and my roomate and his girlfriend.
Watching you fail never gets old. It just keeps getting better and better.
You didn't notice it the first time.
Its funny you included the text as well.
Nice dodge on my original attack.
-
I love how Sokarul feels the need to post pictures of his phone to try to convince us of... well, whatever he's trying to convince us of. Somebody's a bit insecure, I think.
It's so pathetic, even by sokarul's standards. :(
-
I love how Sokarul feels the need to post pictures of his phone to try to convince us of... well, whatever he's trying to convince us of. Somebody's a bit insecure, I think.
It's so pathetic, even by sokarul's standards. :(
Its funny that theengineer was trying to make fun of me and then I own him, yet you ignore that part.
-
I love how Sokarul feels the need to post pictures of his phone to try to convince us of... well, whatever he's trying to convince us of. Somebody's a bit insecure, I think.
It's so pathetic, even by sokarul's standards. :(
Its funny that theengineer was trying to make fun of me and then I own him, yet you ignore that part.
That must be because it never really happened except in your head. ::)
-
Its funny that theengineer was trying to make fun of me and then I own him
When did this 'owning' occur?
-
Yeah so when a girl at a party passes out...
Then she is not willing and you are committing rape. But, it seems like this is the only way for you. Sad, sokarul, very sad.
But wait there is more. I took pictures of my sent messages just for you.
(http://i331.photobucket.com/albums/l448/sokarul/GEDC0185.jpg)
I was with my friend since Elementry school and my roomate and his girlfriend.
Watching you fail never gets old. It just keeps getting better and better.
-
Its funny that theengineer was trying to make fun of me and then I own him
When did this 'owning' occur?
When you said I failed for drinking with guys.
Yeah so when a girl at a party passes out...
Then she is not willing and you are committing rape. But, it seems like this is the only way for you. Sad, sokarul, very sad.
You got me.
-
When you said I failed for drinking with guys.
And then this onwing occurred when you said...what?
You got me.
Like I said, sad, very sad.
-
When you said I failed for drinking with guys.
And then this onwing occurred when you said...what?
When I was drinking with girls a different night.
Like I said, sad, very sad.
Something is sad alright.
-
Just because there are 11 girls at the bar you happen to be in, does not mean you are hanging out with them.
It's funny: I can believe that is your text message, because even outside of this site, your spelling still sucks.
-
Drunk chicks are hot because they don't remember you filming a baseball bat up their loose cootch.
-
I propose moving this thread out of Debate & Discussion, or at least splitting the last few pages from it. It seems to have exhausted all capacity it might once have had for constructive discussion of FET. Do other mods agree?
-
I agree with you. This thread has been derailed to the point of no return. Seeing the massive number of off-topic posts, I doubt anyone would be posting anymore on-topic posts; the on-topic posts will become useless anyway, especially after more posts coming from Sokarul. I prefer moving this thread to Everything Else if you are interested, since at least 80% of it have nothing to do with FET discussions.
-
I split this off from where it stops being about air resistance in FET and starts being about Sokarul's endless supply of idiocy.
-
Just because there are 11 girls at the bar you happen to be in, does not mean you are hanging out with them.
And if you are all at one table?
It's funny: I can believe that is your text message, because even outside of this site, your spelling still sucks.
Yes, I can't spell "hanging."
Give it up.
-
Just because there are 11 girls at the bar you happen to be in, does not mean you are hanging out with them.
And if you are all at one table?
Just how drunk are these girls?
-
Just because there are 11 girls at the bar you happen to be in, does not mean you are hanging out with them.
And if you are all at one table?
Just how drunk are these girls?
Doesn't matter, you wouldn't be interested in them. They aren't 14.
-
Doesn't matter, you wouldn't be interested in them. They aren't 14.
I know, they're eleven. You've already said so.
-
Doesn't matter, you wouldn't be interested in them. They aren't 14.
I know, they're eleven. You've already said so.
Good one.
-
I can't help you. Go look back in this thread. I said something and then you said the exact same thing but didn't realize it. Then you claim my post was ironic.
That is not the part that is ironic.
It was the part where I said you were spoon fed your information and you agreed with it.
Like I said, you even fail at going out and drinking.
That sure sounds funny coming from a guy who rapes his wife.
I'm sure you would have way more fun with wifey...
Too bad she's asleep already.
But, that's never really stopped me before...
But wait there is more. I took pictures of my sent messages just for you.
(http://i331.photobucket.com/albums/l448/sokarul/GEDC0185.jpg)
(http://i331.photobucket.com/albums/l448/sokarul/GEDC0186.jpg)
You know nothing about me.
eww Samsung
-
Just because there are 11 girls at the bar you happen to be in, does not mean you are hanging out with them.
And if you are all at one table?
pics or it didn't happen.
-
I know, they're eleven. You've already said so.
Hah, well done.
-
If they are too young for R Kelly to pee on they don't count.
-
So this is the thread where sok tries to prove his non-gayness and non-paedophilic nature?
Proceed.
-
Ooh, I got modded. :'(
-
Ooh, I got modded. :'(
hurts, dont it?
-
It only hurts until I remember that sokarul posted a picture of his phone to try to prove he was not gay. That makes it all better.
-
That does make everything better, good ol' Sok
-
I want more pictures of Sok saying he's straight. Because that's all he's doing with those images. If I sent a text, Sok, saying I was Zorak the Invincible, President of Canada, and showed you a picture of said text, would that make it true?
-
no,canada doesnt have a president,silly!
-
Prime Minister then? Premier? Chairman? King? I don't care!
-
No, Canada doesn't have a president, silly!
Fix'd.
-
No, Canada doesn't have a president, silly!
Fix'd.
sigh at grammar nazi ::)
xx
-
No, Canada doesn't have a president, silly!
Fix'd.
Sigh at grammar nazi ::)
xx
Fix'd.
-
No, Canada doesn't have a president, silly!
Fix'd.
Sigh at grammar nazi ::)
xx
Fix'd.
theyre everywhere!
i REFUSE to be gassed. >:(
xx
-
It only hurts until I remember that sokarul posted a picture of his phone to try to prove he was not gay. That makes it all better.
That's not why I posted that picture.
-
wai then?
xx
-
I knew one of the guys since I was like seven. I wasn't thinking that he was implying I was gay. Just a loser.