The Flat Earth Society

Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth Debate => Topic started by: jimztar on July 03, 2008, 05:17:04 AM

Title: FE Gravity
Post by: jimztar on July 03, 2008, 05:17:04 AM
I have a couple of problems with gravity (or 'gravitation' if you want to be anal). If gravity is caused by the Earth accelerating upwards, then why is the inverse square law applicable to gravity? The other one takes longer to type out, and I'm tired and lazy, so I won't post it until tomorrow.
Title: Re: FE Gravity
Post by: ghazwozza on July 03, 2008, 06:02:14 AM
Use the search function, you will find no rational answers at all other than "gravity/gravitation does not exist" or "you forgot energy which also has gravity which is for some reason relevant right now".
Title: Re: FE Gravity
Post by: divito the truthist on July 03, 2008, 06:38:04 AM
I have a couple of problems with gravity (or 'gravitation' if you want to be anal). If gravity is caused by the Earth accelerating upwards, then why is the inverse square law applicable to gravity? The other one takes longer to type out, and I'm tired and lazy, so I won't post it until tomorrow.

This question is synonymous to asking, if 4+4 is 8, why is 2*4 applicable to get 8 as well?
Title: Re: FE Gravity
Post by: jimztar on July 03, 2008, 06:40:35 AM
I have a couple of problems with gravity (or 'gravitation' if you want to be anal). If gravity is caused by the Earth accelerating upwards, then why is the inverse square law applicable to gravity? The other one takes longer to type out, and I'm tired and lazy, so I won't post it until tomorrow.

This question is synonymous to asking, if 4+4 is 8, why is 2*4 applicable to get 8 as well?

Not really. If the Earth was accelerating upwards at 9.8ms-2, then acceleration due to gravity would be the same from any distance. That's not the case.
Title: Re: FE Gravity
Post by: Jack on July 03, 2008, 07:06:27 AM
Not really. If the Earth was accelerating upwards at 9.8ms-2, then acceleration due to gravity would be the same from any distance. That's not the case.
Gravitational pull from nearby celestial bodies causes the acceleration differentials.
Title: Re: FE Gravity
Post by: MadDogX on July 03, 2008, 07:06:56 AM
Not really. If the Earth was accelerating upwards at 9.8ms-2, then acceleration due to gravity would be the same from any distance. That's not the case.
Gravitational pull from nearby celestial bodies causes the acceleration differentials.


Unverified.
Title: Re: FE Gravity
Post by: jimztar on July 03, 2008, 07:09:25 AM
Unverified.

This. Can you provide any evidence?
Title: Re: FE Gravity
Post by: ghazwozza on July 03, 2008, 08:10:37 AM
I have a couple of problems with gravity (or 'gravitation' if you want to be anal). If gravity is caused by the Earth accelerating upwards, then why is the inverse square law applicable to gravity? The other one takes longer to type out, and I'm tired and lazy, so I won't post it until tomorrow.

This question is synonymous to asking, if 4+4 is 8, why is 2*4 applicable to get 8 as well?

No it isn't.
Title: Re: FE Gravity
Post by: divito the truthist on July 03, 2008, 08:14:34 AM
Yes, it is; it's non-sequitur.
Title: Re: FE Gravity
Post by: Ski on July 03, 2008, 08:51:12 AM
Not really. If the Earth was accelerating upwards at 9.8ms-2, then acceleration due to gravity would be the same from any distance. That's not the case.
Gravitational pull from nearby celestial bodies causes the acceleration differentials.

This and the fact the earth probably produces a nearly indiscernible gravitation if we conclude GR is correct.
Title: Re: FE Gravity
Post by: ghazwozza on July 03, 2008, 09:08:47 AM
Yes, it is; it's non-sequitur.

No, s/he's saying "If the Earth is accelerating upwards, downward acceleration cannot depend on height, but it does." It's not a non-sequiter, s/he just didn't know about the "gravitational pull of the stars".