| Guide Title | Forum Link | |
| Reference | ||
| The Flat Earth Model | 21447 (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=21147.0) | |
| RE compared to FE | 20406 (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=20406) | |
| RE Urban Legends | 21167 (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=21167.0) | |
| The Best of RE Science | 21210 (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=21210.0) | |
| Index | 21146 (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=21146.0) | |
| My Writings | ||
| Tips to being an RE'er | 12156 (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=12156.0) | |
| Floating Oceans | 16948 (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=16948.0) | |
| Trinity of Proof | 12194 (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=12194.0) | |
| Poll: FE vs. RE | 11882 (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=11882.0) | |
| Which way is up again? | 12255 (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=12255.0) | |
| Gravitons, a discussion | 15565 (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=15565.0) | |
| To the females of these boards | 17673 (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=17673.0) | |
| Shoe results are in | 12866 (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=12866.0) | |
| Perverts or Xmen | 15981 (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=15981.0) | |
| NASA uses modified picture format | 22051 (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=22051.0) | |
| Published Works | ||
| State of FES | /. (http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/08/10/1241218) | |
| Peer reviewed comments | Org (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=10327;sa=showPosts) | |
| Peer reviewed comments | Net (http://theflatearthsociety.net/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=4;sa=showPosts) | |
| Further Reading | ||
| Correlation between Round Earthism and bad grammar? | 11576 (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=11576.0) | |
| 0.999... != 1 | 21984 (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=21984.0) |
Ever seen thisfail.
Here is an equation I have created that prooves the Earth is round.
AN equation I have formed to disprove the FE. A is the electromagnetic field and B is the dark reterention energy rays that are accelerating the earth upward. Here is how it would look for a flat earth...
a=b=1
aČ=ab
aČ-bČ=ab-bČ
(a+b)(a-b)=b(a-b)
a+b=b
1+1=1
2=1
Not possible...
Victory for the RE!
I'm gonna be the very best...
Ever seen this
Here is an equation I have created that prooves the Earth is round.
AN equation I have formed to disprove the FE. A is the electromagnetic field and B is the dark reterention energy rays that are accelerating the earth upward. Here is how it would look for a flat earth...
a=b=1
aČ=ab
aČ-bČ=ab-bČ
(a+b)(a-b)=b(a-b)
a+b=b
1+1=1
2=1
Not possible...
Victory for the RE!
I'm gonna be the very best...
a+b=b
1+1=1
2=1
Not possible...
a=1 b=1, a+b = 1+1 = 2
a+b=b
1+1=1
2=1
Not possible...
True, but that's because 1+1 is not 1. Nothing you said makes that reasonable. You being shit at maths makes us not care what you have to say, it doesn't disprove the FE model.
This is a good guide though narc, it should be stickied.
Hi narcberry,
I think your index is fantastic! I even told my sister!
[1] a=b=1
[2] aČ=ab
[3] aČ-bČ=ab-bČ
[4] (a+b)(a-b)=b(a-b)
[5] a+b=b
[6] 1+1=1
[7] 2=1
I read RE compared to FE and have become 10x dumber because you made REer's look completely dumb and stupid scientists when actually most REer's are quite intelligent and know what their talking about. Also, all of the FE and RE responses are "<message>" (or quoted), however where did those quotes come from?
We were worried?
Exactly. ::)We were worried?
About what?
I don't always believe news, because every news producer (or station) is biased in some way. For instance CNN doesn't cover the good news of Iraq, however they do cover the bad news about Iraq.
The fact that there are less car bombings and US soldiers being killed. But if you think 40,000 people is a lot, then look at the millions that died in WWII (all countries...about 500,000 to 1,000,000 Americans died)This really brightened my day! :D
The fact that there are less car bombings and US soldiers being killed. But if you think 40,000 people is a lot, then look at the millions that died in WWII (all countries...about 500,000 to 1,000,000 Americans died)
All wars are bad, but that doesn't mean that a way is meaningless. The war is here because the insurgents took over Iraq/Afghanistan and Osama Bin Laden killed innocent lives. If we wouldn't have gone there then there would be more innocent lives killed. Also, they had killed 2-4,000 US citizens. That's not good, would you look at that and be like... "Ah, it's ok, they're not suffering or anything."
In WW2 we took over Asia and Europe, after our allies had all tried and failed.
We didn't take over all of Europe and Asia, we destroyed them? Yes, but we help them rebuild. Nagasaki and Hiroshima are examples of how we destroyed them then rebuilt them.
All wars are bad, but that doesn't mean that a way is meaningless. The war is here because the insurgents took over Iraq/Afghanistan and Osama Bin Laden killed innocent lives. If we wouldn't have gone there then there would be more innocent lives killed. Also, they had killed 2-4,000 US citizens. That's not good, would you look at that and be like... "Ah, it's ok, they're not suffering or anything."
EDIT: United states soldiers have killed more innocent Iraqis than were killed in September 11th, but of course with all your flag waving why would you care about a few dead "a-rabs". And also, before you get on my case, I am not against the troops, I AM against murder...under ANY circumstance.
You Europeans should be glad we gave you back. IMO, you should be paying U.S. taxes for all our work.
The War of 1812; arguably one of the best keggers in human history.You Europeans should be glad we gave you back. IMO, you should be paying U.S. taxes for all our work.
Welp, I'm from Canada, and we burnt down the whitehouse...after partying in it for three days.
The War of 1812; arguably one of the best keggers in human history.You Europeans should be glad we gave you back. IMO, you should be paying U.S. taxes for all our work.
Welp, I'm from Canada, and we burnt down the whitehouse...after partying in it for three days.
Another note:because we care, just because the leadership is jacked up does not mean the populace needs to suffer
We feed North Korea (read as people will starve and die without free US imports of food). Why are we doing that?
That's a good, if somewhat callous, point. The world is only ever 3 meals away from revolution, so a few trade embargoes could have solved the Iraq conflict.and they worked so well with cuba, not to mention how far we have come with iran
there is not much the populace can do, he keeps a pretty tight reign over there.
yeah because the chinese populace was so successful at overthrowing their oppresive leaders as well as the kurds in iraqthere is not much the populace can do, he keeps a pretty tight reign over there.
Wow. Toss history aside, we have cbarnett97!
That's a good, if somewhat callous, point. The world is only ever 3 meals away from revolution, so a few trade embargoes could have solved the Iraq conflict.
The kurds are a vast minority. Learn about Iraq.minority or not how did they fare?
Guessed: "Under an agreement already in place, Saddam is allowed to export unlimited quantities of oil and use the money to import food and medicines"
They were mustard gassed in their homes, not starved. They were farmers living in the north, while Baghdad was in (from memory) central/South Iraq, so this weak minority would have had to trek through what would immediately become hostile terrain for miles. It's like you're asking British pastafarians to overthrow France. As to your second point, the same way a white minority ruled a black majority in South Africa. Through force, guns and it wasn't worth it for most black people. It was a dictatorship.and what did the black minority do in south africa
The black majority did sod all, but they weren't being starved. Can't you grasp that? Are you actually 11?
yeah because the chinese populace was so successful at overthrowing their oppresive leaders as well as the kurds in iraqthere is not much the populace can do, he keeps a pretty tight reign over there.
Wow. Toss history aside, we have cbarnett97!
Thanks C-Ray for pointing that out. I admit, grammar is not my strong suite.Dude, I'm sorry. All your friends are ... dead. They didn't survive the cryogenesis. You were gone for a long time. More than 3 years. Life just went on without you. The good news is that it is up to you to repopulate the world with flat earthers. Rooster will donate her womb. She isn't using it.
Thanks C-Ray for pointing that out. I admit, grammar is not my strong suite.
I heard questioning the official Flat Earth Society spokesman is a bammable offense.
I could put "Official FES Spokesman" under my picture and it would not make me so.
Narcberry, may I suggest that you fix your avatar? The image seems to be broked.
Weightless water? I hope that is a joke. If the oceans are weightless, then please explain to me the plight of the Indonesian people in 2004. Also explain to me why things get crushed when they go deep underwater. If the oceans are "weightless" then surely water pressure wouldn't exist, would it?
Weightless water? I hope that is a joke. If the oceans are weightless, then please explain to me the plight of the Indonesian people in 2004. Also explain to me why things get crushed when they go deep underwater. If the oceans are "weightless" then surely water pressure wouldn't exist, would it?
Or the Earth is flat.
I read a few of the links provided in the op. Complete garbage. Utter uselessness. Weightless water? I hope that is a joke. If the oceans are weightless, then please explain to me the plight of the Indonesian people in 2004. Also explain to me why things get crushed when they go deep underwater. If the oceans are "weightless" then surely water pressure wouldn't exist, would it?
I'd stickie you if I could
It seems clear that you did not read the thread appropriately titled for this subject before re-hashing it here, clearly against forum rules. I suggest you collect data before making assertions, you look quite silly doing it the other way around.
I found myself lost in this guide for hours. I can find nothing but praise for the content found within the links.
You look quite silly going around saying that the oceans are weightless. Never in my life have I ever heard a stupider, more asinine statement.
Okay, I'll bite. How do you know that if the Earth was round the oceans would be weightless?You look quite silly going around saying that the oceans are weightless. Never in my life have I ever heard a stupider, more asinine statement.
Since you seem to be too thick to understand the argument, I'll simplify it for you. If the earth was round oceans would be weightless. If the earth was flat oceans would not be weightless.
Therefore, the earth is flat.
You look quite silly going around saying that the oceans are weightless. Never in my life have I ever heard a stupider, more asinine statement.
Since you seem to be too thick to understand the argument, I'll simplify it for you. If the earth was round oceans would be weightless. If the earth was flat oceans would not be weightless.
Therefore, the earth is flat.
Okay, I'll bite. How do you know that if the Earth was round the oceans would be weightless?You look quite silly going around saying that the oceans are weightless. Never in my life have I ever heard a stupider, more asinine statement.
Since you seem to be too thick to understand the argument, I'll simplify it for you. If the earth was round oceans would be weightless. If the earth was flat oceans would not be weightless.
Therefore, the earth is flat.
Every molecule in the ocean is perfectly buoyant. That is to say the buoyancy force is exactly opposite to the gravity force on it. This means the oceans are free from gravity.
Okay, I'll bite. How do you know that if the Earth was round the oceans would be weightless?You look quite silly going around saying that the oceans are weightless. Never in my life have I ever heard a stupider, more asinine statement.
Since you seem to be too thick to understand the argument, I'll simplify it for you. If the earth was round oceans would be weightless. If the earth was flat oceans would not be weightless.
Therefore, the earth is flat.Quote from: NarcberryEvery molecule in the ocean is perfectly buoyant. That is to say the buoyancy force is exactly opposite to the gravity force on it. This means the oceans are free from gravity.
On a round earth, gravity free oceans would disperse quite quickly. However, on a flat earth, gravity free oceans aren't a problem at all!
non sequitur. Please do try harder.Okay, I'll bite. How do you know that if the Earth was round the oceans would be weightless?You look quite silly going around saying that the oceans are weightless. Never in my life have I ever heard a stupider, more asinine statement.
Since you seem to be too thick to understand the argument, I'll simplify it for you. If the earth was round oceans would be weightless. If the earth was flat oceans would not be weightless.
Therefore, the earth is flat.Quote from: NarcberryEvery molecule in the ocean is perfectly buoyant. That is to say the buoyancy force is exactly opposite to the gravity force on it. This means the oceans are free from gravity.
On a round earth, gravity free oceans would disperse quite quickly. However, on a flat earth, gravity free oceans aren't a problem at all!
non sequitur. Please do try harder.Okay, I'll bite. How do you know that if the Earth was round the oceans would be weightless?You look quite silly going around saying that the oceans are weightless. Never in my life have I ever heard a stupider, more asinine statement.
Since you seem to be too thick to understand the argument, I'll simplify it for you. If the earth was round oceans would be weightless. If the earth was flat oceans would not be weightless.
Therefore, the earth is flat.Quote from: NarcberryEvery molecule in the ocean is perfectly buoyant. That is to say the buoyancy force is exactly opposite to the gravity force on it. This means the oceans are free from gravity.
On a round earth, gravity free oceans would disperse quite quickly. However, on a flat earth, gravity free oceans aren't a problem at all!
There's nothing to rebut. You'll have to support your conclusion before there's anything to discuss. Don't strain yourself, though, as it's impossible. Thanks for trying though.non sequitur. Please do try harder.Okay, I'll bite. How do you know that if the Earth was round the oceans would be weightless?You look quite silly going around saying that the oceans are weightless. Never in my life have I ever heard a stupider, more asinine statement.
Since you seem to be too thick to understand the argument, I'll simplify it for you. If the earth was round oceans would be weightless. If the earth was flat oceans would not be weightless.
Therefore, the earth is flat.Quote from: NarcberryEvery molecule in the ocean is perfectly buoyant. That is to say the buoyancy force is exactly opposite to the gravity force on it. This means the oceans are free from gravity.
On a round earth, gravity free oceans would disperse quite quickly. However, on a flat earth, gravity free oceans aren't a problem at all!
Please do stop back when you can think of a real rebuttal, or at least a fitting logical fallacy.
Bumping this Quality Thread.