The Flat Earth Society

Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth Debate => Topic started by: RENTAKOW on June 14, 2007, 01:45:19 PM

Title: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: RENTAKOW on June 14, 2007, 01:45:19 PM
Why can't I see the southern cross? I live on lattitude line 47, ~500 feet above MSL, in the northern hemisphere of planet earth.

(Their, I made the question straight forward, detailed and easy to understand for the FE folks.)

Disclaimer: no prooof of purchase nessicary to play. Offer only valid to FE believers. Must be 18 or older to play.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Tom Bishop. on June 14, 2007, 01:46:13 PM
Why can't I see the southern cross? I live on lattitude line 47, ~500 feet above MSL, in the northern hemisphere of planet earth.

(Their, I made the question straight forward, detailed and easy to understand for the FE folks.)

Disclaimer: no prooof of purchase nessicary to play. Offer only valid to FE believers. Must be 18 or older to play.
Did you read Earth Not a Globe before making this thread?
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Gulliver on June 14, 2007, 01:48:56 PM
Why can't I see the southern cross? I live on lattitude line 47, ~500 feet above MSL, in the northern hemisphere of planet earth.

(Their, I made the question straight forward, detailed and easy to understand for the FE folks.)

Disclaimer: no prooof of purchase nessicary to play. Offer only valid to FE believers. Must be 18 or older to play.
Did you read Earth Not a Globe before making this thread?
Did you read a high-school physics textbook before posting that question?
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Skeptical ATM on June 14, 2007, 01:51:15 PM
Tom, noone takes that book seriously. You know that full well. Stop using it.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: SparteX on June 14, 2007, 01:52:59 PM
HAHAHAHAHA mike you're killing me XD
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Skeptical ATM on June 14, 2007, 01:54:22 PM
It's not fake it's just wrong. We can read it if we want. Now here's a questio, when was the last time you beat someone in a debate? Never? Go throw some pants on and leave.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: RENTAKOW on June 14, 2007, 01:59:53 PM
ANSWER MY GODDAMN QUESTION TOM!

P.S. Incase you can't take a hint: I know that I cannot see the southern cross because it is below the horizon. But I'm sure their is a reason for this even if the earth is flat. It's a good thing I dont live on the other side of the world or I would look north to see the souther cross if the earth were flat.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: RENTAKOW on June 14, 2007, 08:35:54 PM
Bueller, Bueller?
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Jenova Cell on June 14, 2007, 09:19:06 PM
Hey, Rentacow.. they are using the usual FE bull hockey.. better watch out :]

No, but really. these guys will never give you a piece of proof for their theories. They ALWAYS claim conspiracy and will almost never answer questions directly. its always.. "did you read the FAQ?"

I think its quite ammusing actually..
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: RENTAKOW on June 14, 2007, 09:30:44 PM
Their a bunch of whack jobs. GET YOUR HEAD CHECKED OUT!
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Tom Bishop on June 14, 2007, 09:46:19 PM
The declination of the stars as an observer travels north or south is a matter of perception. From Chapter 14, section 6 of Earth Not a Globe:


Therefore, stars will continue to descend when one travels North or South until they disappear past the vanishing point.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Gulliver on June 14, 2007, 10:09:01 PM
The declination of the stars as an observer travels north or south is a matter of perception. From Chapter 14, section 6 of Earth Not a Globe:

    "Another phenomenon supposed to prove rotundity, is thought to be the fact that Polaris, or the north polar star sinks to the horizon as the traveller approaches the equator, on passing which it becomes invisible. This is a conclusion fully as premature and illogical as that involved in the several cases already alluded to. It is an ordinary effect of perspective for an object to appear lower and lower as the observer goes farther and farther away from it. Let any one try the experiment of looking at a light-house, church spire, monument, gas lamp, or other elevated object, from a distance of only a few yards, and notice the angle at which it is observed. On going farther away, the angle under which it is seen will diminish, and the object will appear lower and lower as the distance of the observer increases, until, at a certain point, the line of sight to the object, and the apparently uprising surface of the earth upon or over which it stands, will converge to the angle which constitutes the "vanishing point" or the horizon; beyond which it will be invisible.

    What can be more common than the observation that, standing at one end of a long row of lamp-posts, those nearest to us seem to be the highest; and those farthest away the lowest; whilst, as we move along towards the opposite end of the series, those which we approach seem to get higher, and those we are leaving behind appear to gradually become lower.

    This lowering of the pole star as we recede southwards; and the rising of the stars in the south as we approach them, is the necessary result of the everywhere visible law of perspective operating between the eye-line of the observer, the object observed, and the plane surface upon which he stands; and has no connection with or relation whatever to the supposed rotundity of the earth."

Therefore, stars will continue to descend when one travels North or South until they disappear past the vanishing point.
Still wrong. There would be distortion of the constellations as the stars moved across the sky if this were true. It's just the idle wanderings of a poor scientist.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Lolburst on June 15, 2007, 12:28:49 AM
Stars stay in one formation, they won't move. If earth was flat, you could see every star formation if you look to sky.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Ferruccio on June 15, 2007, 03:05:33 AM
True, the perspective effect would effectively squash the stars near the horizon, instead of have the horizon cut them off.  Look at any pattern on a ceiling and watch as the squares above your head become squashed trapezoids in the distance.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: SparteX on June 15, 2007, 09:13:49 AM
if the sun gets farther away causing sunsets etc, why do constellations and plenetary nebluae move accross the sky at night as well?  ::)
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: umbongo on June 15, 2007, 09:21:56 AM
at what height is the stars?

they have to be really near the earth for rombottoms theory to work
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: SparteX on June 15, 2007, 09:24:30 AM
Yet dispite the distance of the object, neighbouring galaxies being the farthest, they all move accross the sky at the same rate? by you people's logic, the closer it is the faster it would seem to move.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Jenova Cell on June 15, 2007, 09:25:30 AM
They wont give you a straight answer. and that is an excellent point SparteX. stars move in a pentagonal pattern throughout the year, but I'm sure the FEers will simply say that the FE rotates in that same pattern, which produces the "illusion" of movement.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Mrs. Peach on June 15, 2007, 09:26:27 AM
Why can't I see the southern cross? I live on lattitude line 47, ~500 feet above MSL, in the northern hemisphere of planet earth.

(Their, I made the question straight forward, detailed and easy to understand for the FE folks.)


Mr. Rentacow, use "search" first and you'll save yourself a lot of effort. The advanced search may be required.  The question has been posed numerous times.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: umbongo on June 15, 2007, 09:34:28 AM
and the answer zero times:)
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Jenova Cell on June 15, 2007, 09:36:48 AM
They always tell you to look up the answer, lol. they never answer straight to the point
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Mrs. Peach on June 15, 2007, 09:38:39 AM
Why can't I see the southern cross? I live on lattitude line 47, ~500 feet above MSL, in the northern hemisphere of planet earth.

(Their, I made the question straight forward, detailed and easy to understand for the FE folks.)

Disclaimer: no prooof of purchase nessicary to play. Offer only valid to FE believers. Must be 18 or older to play.

Because the earth is a sphere.  When do I get the money?
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Jenova Cell on June 15, 2007, 09:39:38 AM
I thought you were an FE?
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Mrs. Peach on June 15, 2007, 09:41:10 AM
OMG, I thought you were.  ;D
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Jenova Cell on June 15, 2007, 09:41:50 AM
Ha, my bad. glad were on equal terms now
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Mrs. Peach on June 15, 2007, 09:44:53 AM
I was so bowled over by Cow's logic that I instantly saw the light.  Now I want the thou.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Bushido on June 15, 2007, 09:50:39 AM
(http://www.ownedirl.com/Thread-Crap-Worst_Ever.jpg)
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Skeptical ATM on June 15, 2007, 02:03:37 PM
People tell you to look it up for several reasons;

The answer may be on the forum, having been discussed by many many people.

They may think the answer is somewhere, but it is not.

They are lazy.

They know full weell that you haven't looked for the answers you've just posted this piecee of crap thread.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Jenova Cell on June 15, 2007, 02:08:12 PM
you see, the problem with that logic, is that the answers are no where to be found. I (who have looked in various threads), have asked repatedly from numberous people to just give one piece of actual evidence to support the insane idea of a flat earth and have received none. people either ask you to go look it up, and when they realize that there isnt any anywhere, they give you reasons why they shouldnt give it to you. It has nothing to do with them being lazy, its just a bit difficult for them to come up with evidence that doesnt exist. sorry to break it to you, but your wrong.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Skeptical ATM on June 15, 2007, 02:18:45 PM
Well no, I'm right. You're just ignorant.

However most of the time the info is not an 'answer', it is a debate where either a) we let it die because it was clogged up with people going "you're all crazy I have seen a launch dumbo" or b) it's an unfinished debate. ie, we never reached an answer. There is c); the debate was finished. Usually because noone can explain it in the FE universe so RE wins the point. Although occasionally us Round Earthers find ourselves out matched.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: SparteX on June 15, 2007, 02:25:31 PM
Well no, I'm right. You're just ignorant.

However most of the time the info is not an 'answer', it is a debate where either a) we let it die because it was clogged up with people going "you're all crazy I have seen a launch dumbo" or b) it's an unfinished debate. ie, we never reached an answer. There is c); the debate was finished. Usually because noone can explain it in the FE universe so RE wins the point. Although occasionally us Round Earthers find ourselves out matched.


i've got it!! if the earth is flat thus having no gravity, i could theoretically fire a high calibre bullet from the earth's surface, and it would simply carry on upwards as it's speed exceeds that of the earth, since a high calibre bullet is quite capable of breaking earth orbit past the atmosphere were it not for gravity, i'd never see it again.

In reality, firing any calibre shell from the planet's surface will always return due to the effect of gravity, NOT ATMOSPHERE before you say that

SparteX wins.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Roundy the Truthinessist on June 15, 2007, 02:26:13 PM
Or UA.   ::)

SparteX loses.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: TheEngineer on June 15, 2007, 02:26:53 PM
Except that the earth is accelerating, so you lose.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Roundy the Truthinessist on June 15, 2007, 02:27:27 PM
Beatcha to it, Engy!   8)
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Skeptical ATM on June 15, 2007, 02:28:47 PM
Oh come on, his is too easy. The UA would counter act this effect. HAd you any brains you would realise this. It may not be a plausible scientific theory on every minute level, but it explains that.

*Facepalm*
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Mrs. Peach on June 15, 2007, 02:32:32 PM
I still want the thou.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Skeptical ATM on June 15, 2007, 02:33:36 PM
What?
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: SparteX on June 15, 2007, 02:35:28 PM
With the correct math i could calculate the time it would take for it to return to earth under the influence of gravity. Provide me with the current speed the earth is travelling and it's rate of accelleration and i can calculate the time it would take to return to earth un aided by gravity but by the earth catching up to it.

If the earth is accellerating we'd be feeling much heavier every day, like when a car speeds up.

if the earth was catching up with the bullet, it would seemingly float down to earth slowly. not at several thousand miles per hour  ::)
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: TheEngineer on June 15, 2007, 02:38:39 PM
The acceleration due to 'gravity' is 9.8m/s^2.

The acceleration of the earth is 9.8m/s^2.

Good luck.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: SparteX on June 15, 2007, 02:43:20 PM
The acceleration due to 'gravity' is 9.8m/s^2.

The acceleration of the earth is 9.8m/s^2.

Good luck.
what a coincidence. The acceleration of earth just happens to correspond to the earth's actualy gravitation, Who'da thought [sarcasm]

you still havn't prooved my other fact wrong. Acceleration causes inertia, do you feel like you weigh more every day?
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Mrs. Peach on June 15, 2007, 02:43:52 PM
What?

Are you speaking to me?
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: TheEngineer on June 15, 2007, 02:44:55 PM
Why would you think the numbers would be different?


The acceleration is constant, therefore the force we feel is constant.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Skeptical ATM on June 15, 2007, 02:45:39 PM
Constant acceleration doesn't cause that effect. Oh and yes, I was Mrs More. What's thou?
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: SparteX on June 15, 2007, 02:51:16 PM
Why would you think the numbers would be different?


The acceleration is constant, therefore the force we feel in constant.
yes, it does. Clearly none of you drive, accelerating at a constant rate from 20mph to 60mph causes inertia.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: TheEngineer on June 15, 2007, 02:53:27 PM
F=m*a

Mass is constant, acceleration is constant.  How is force not?

Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Skeptical ATM on June 15, 2007, 02:53:59 PM
Not for me when I'm in a car... In a train or plane yes, but the acceleration isn't constant. And it's over a very short span. And it's more powerful than the average car. UA acceleration is infinite- it would not cause inertia.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Roundy the Truthinessist on June 15, 2007, 02:56:47 PM
If you're accelerating at a constant rate in a car, do you feel more and more inertia as you get faster, or do you feel the same amount as long as you're accelerating at that same rate?  ???

Not being a smart-ass, this is an honest question.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Max Fagin on June 15, 2007, 02:59:40 PM
The acceleration of the earth is 9.8m/s^2.

Why do FE'ers even need to postulate the universal accelerator?  Every single observation that FE'ers bring up in the discussion of the UA can be explained by universal gravitation.  The UA doesn't help explain any observations that we don't currently understand, so why do FE'ers insist on it so much?
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Mr. Ireland on June 15, 2007, 03:00:12 PM
what a coincidence. The acceleration of earth just happens to correspond to the earth's actualy gravitation, Who'da thought [sarcasm]

The earth wasn't made for our numbers, it's just a fact that the UA would push the earth upwards at 9.8m/s2.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: TheEngineer on June 15, 2007, 03:16:59 PM
Especially since I can measure the acceleration of the FE at home.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: RENTAKOW on June 15, 2007, 03:20:21 PM
SparteX, the earth would be accelerating due to UBSA (Universal Bull Spit Acceleration) so it would eventually catch up with the bullet.

CAN WE MOVE ON!? Nobody has qualified to receive the one thousand dollar reward yet. And PLEASE don't make me bother my Australian friends by asking them to take a picture of Crux. Did I read somewhere that Alaska and Australia (along with Antarctica) don't exist on a flat earth? This sounds like continents-whose-names-begin-with-"A" discrimination. Perhaps we should all take a look at www.societyagainstdiscriminationtowordscontinentswhosenamesbeginwitha.com (http://www.shutthefuckup.com).

Especially since I can measure the acceleration of the FE at home.
O RLY? Thats neat, because I can measure the force of gravity at home too. That argument really threw me for a whirl. Great job!

Now why don't you take a crack at answering the question in the OP.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Mr. Ireland on June 15, 2007, 03:23:23 PM
Do a search of the southern cross.  If 1 000 pages don't come up, there's something wrong...
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Mrs. Peach on June 15, 2007, 03:24:26 PM
I answered the question.  Where's the thou?
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: TheEngineer on June 15, 2007, 03:25:18 PM
Especially since I can measure the acceleration of the FE at home.
O RLY? Thats neat, because I can measure the force of gravity at home too. That argument really threw me for a whirl. Great job!
Yep, it sure is neat.  Plus, all I need to do it is a stopwatch, a ruler, and something to drop. 
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Mrs. Peach on June 15, 2007, 03:27:36 PM
Why can't I see the southern cross? I live on lattitude line 47, ~500 feet above MSL, in the northern hemisphere of planet earth.

(Their, I made the question straight forward, detailed and easy to understand for the FE folks.)

Disclaimer: no prooof of purchase nessicary to play. Offer only valid to FE believers. Must be 18 or older to play.

Because the earth is a sphere.  When do I get the money?

Was this not the answer to the OP?
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: sokarul on June 15, 2007, 03:37:44 PM
Especially since I can measure the acceleration of the FE at home.
O RLY? Thats neat, because I can measure the force of gravity at home too. That argument really threw me for a whirl. Great job!
Yep, it sure is neat.  Plus, all I need to do it is a stopwatch, a ruler, and something to drop. 
You would get the exact same answer on a round earth with mass bending spacetime.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: RENTAKOW on June 15, 2007, 03:38:22 PM
Mrs. More, please read the disclaimer.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Mrs. Peach on June 15, 2007, 03:42:13 PM
Mrs. More, please read the disclaimer.
I was so bowled over by Cow's logic that I instantly saw the light.  Now I want the thou.

Please read my disclaimer to your disclaimer.

And didn't you also post previously that the Southern Cross was NOT visible from the Northern Hemisphere?
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: RENTAKOW on June 15, 2007, 03:43:54 PM
Especially since I can measure the acceleration of the FE at home.
O RLY? Thats neat, because I can measure the force of gravity at home too. That argument really threw me for a whirl. Great job!
Yep, it sure is neat.  Plus, all I need to do it is a stopwatch, a ruler, and something to drop. 
So what are you trying to prove? That the earths gravity constant is 9.8m/s^2, and if the earth were accelerating at 9.8m/s^2 it would feel the same?
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: RENTAKOW on June 15, 2007, 03:44:48 PM
Mrs. More, please read the disclaimer.
I was so bowled over by Cow's logic that I instantly saw the light.  Now I want the thou.

Please read my disclaimer to your disclaimer.

And didn't you also post previously that the Southern Cross was NOT visible from the Northern Hemisphere?
Hooked on ebonics worked for you didn't it.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Mrs. Peach on June 15, 2007, 03:52:12 PM
Rentacow, A route to finding all your questions is here

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=14337.msg229104#msg229104

we have search feature. use it
If you don't have an answer to the question, please:
(http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u178/lovechrisD/stfu.jpg)

Dogplatter, what do you call a scientist that studys the shape of the earth? I'm talking about sphere vs. flat, BTW, so if you say "geologist" I will virtually bitch slap you.

It's been obvious for awhile now that it is impossible for the earth to be flat, yet you still cannot look at the evidence. IT'S EASY! WALK YOUR ASS OUT SIDE AT NIGHT AND LOOK SOUTH! DO YOU SEE THE SOUTHERN CROSS? No, if you live in the northern hemisphere you can't! No conspiracy, no ice wall, no turtles, no flat earth! It's only going to be time that will make you realize this.

Of course, you were wrong there.  And insulting.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Jenova Cell on June 15, 2007, 04:02:56 PM
No, hes not wrong. or insulting. If you take the fact that your wrong as an insult, then yes. you should be insulted, but just give it up. The flat earth idea could never happen. end of story. None of you have given a BIT of evidence. all you do is read a stupid FAQ and some books from 1850. besides being outdated, its a bunch of theoretical junk with no actual evidence to back it up. If you honestly believe the earth is flat, you should dig a hole (1) take your books (2) and live there for the rest of your days because we dont need people like you attempting (albeit not very well) to convince others that the earth is indeed flat. Give it a break. Its over. No conspiracy. No 50,000 foot Ice wall. No turtles or elephants that support the earth. No 1g propulsion. Get over it..

                  The Earth is Round
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Mrs. Peach on June 15, 2007, 04:16:42 PM
The "evidence" given here is wrong, Jenova Cell.  The Southern Cross is visible in Key West, Florida, for Pete's sake.

It is visible anywhere in the Northern Hemisphere in latitudes lower than about 300N. 
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: RENTAKOW on June 15, 2007, 04:24:04 PM
Ok then, why is it not visible at higher latitudes?

Waiting for your answer.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Mrs. Peach on June 15, 2007, 04:29:58 PM
How many times do I have to say this?  Because the earth is a sphere.  Do you not read your own threads?
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: RENTAKOW on June 15, 2007, 04:42:16 PM
I'm sure that a FE'er will object to that. Why do you answer a question that no one asked you?
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: TheEngineer on June 15, 2007, 05:05:24 PM
So what are you trying to prove? That the earths gravity constant is 9.8m/s^2, and if the earth were accelerating at 9.8m/s^2 it would feel the same?
Yep, that's pretty much it.  Now do you see why your example was wrong?
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: RENTAKOW on June 15, 2007, 05:09:48 PM
So what are you trying to prove? That the earths gravity constant is 9.8m/s^2, and if the earth were accelerating at 9.8m/s^2 it would feel the same?
Yep, that's pretty much it.  Now do you see why your example was wrong?
No, yours was wrong.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: TheEngineer on June 15, 2007, 05:15:46 PM
So what are you trying to prove? That the earths gravity constant is 9.8m/s^2, and if the earth were accelerating at 9.8m/s^2 it would feel the same?
Yep, that's pretty much it.  Now do you see why your example was wrong?
No, yours was wrong.
My what was wrong?  You are the one that gave the example.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: RENTAKOW on June 15, 2007, 09:29:40 PM
Yours was wrong.
Suyo estuvo equivocado.
Le vôtre avait tort.
Ihres waren falsch.
Il vostro aveva torto.
Van de joue was verkeerd.
O seu estava errado.
Ваши был неправильным.
Din var gal.

Any questions?
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: TheEngineer on June 15, 2007, 09:33:44 PM
Yes, my what was wrong?
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: RENTAKOW on June 15, 2007, 09:35:50 PM
I know, thats why I'm asking you.

The following is for RE'ers eyes only:
If your wondering why I'm playing word games, the reason is that I'm playing by FE'er rules.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Roundy the Truthinessist on June 16, 2007, 12:00:36 AM
I think I'm having a seizure from looking at your avatar!  :o
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: RENTAKOW on June 16, 2007, 12:05:17 AM
I think I'm having a seizure from looking at your avatar!  :o
And yet you are hypnotized by it!  :P
T minus 24 hours until RE claims "prison bitch" over FE'ers.

EDIT: Mrs. More, I'm sorry I was rude to you. I figured you understood the basis of this question, but perhaps it was myself that should have made this clearer. When I formulated this question, I was hoping for a solution that involved the earth being flat. Seeing as the earth is round, the FE supporters have thus far been unable to solve this dilemma.
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Trekky0623 on June 16, 2007, 07:37:32 AM
Why can't I see the southern cross? I live on lattitude line 47, ~500 feet above MSL, in the northern hemisphere of planet earth.

(Their, I made the question straight forward, detailed and easy to understand for the FE folks.)

Disclaimer: no prooof of purchase nessicary to play. Offer only valid to FE believers. Must be 18 or older to play.
Did you read Earth Not a Globe before making this thread?
"The Earth is flat.  How do I know this?  Because I am looking at the horizon, be-atch, ha ha ha"
                                                                                                           -Earth Not a Globe
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Skeptical ATM on June 16, 2007, 03:08:22 PM
That's nice Trekky...

Regardless of who's wrong do we need to be insulting all the time?
Title: Re: 1 thousand dollars if you explain this (without the usual FE bull hockey).
Post by: Roundy the Truthinessist on June 16, 2007, 03:09:46 PM
Yes.