The Flat Earth Society
Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth Q&A => Topic started by: Trekky0623 on May 03, 2007, 05:30:06 PM
-
Isn't this the most conclusive evidence we have of a Round Earth?
-
No.
-
What about those images makes you think they accurately represent the earth?
-
I think video works better
(http://)
-
That's one looong dive in a plane...
-
Isn't this the most conclusive evidence we have of a Round Earth?
thats what I said a while ago. The whole debate should have ended once all these pictures and videos were made but all the FEers can say is they're fake and part of the conspiracy
-
Better REers than you have made this point and failed. Photos are easily faked. If I showed you a picture of a flat Earth from space, would you accept it?
-
Better REers than you have made this point and failed. Photos are easily faked. If I showed you a picture of a flat Earth from space, would you accept it?
And the video part?
-
Videos are also easily faked.
-
Videos are also easily faked.
lol
-
Pictures I can believe because it's been done flawlessly before photoshop. Video's though, how would you go about that? That's like 1000 pictures for one little video. Right?
-
The entire premise of this website is that NASA is a fraudulent entity. Any dolt could see that.
If you require proof for this just consult one of the many moon/mars hoax websites. It is immediately obvious NASA is fraudulent just by looking at their financial records and noticing how they have a habit of spending $4000 for a single pencil.
-
The entire premise of this website is that NASA is a fraudulent entity. Any dolt could see that.
If you require proof for this just consult one of the many moon/mars hoax websites. It is immediately obvious NASA is fraudulent just by looking at their financial records and noticing how they have a habit of spending $4000 for a single pencil.
What about the websites that debunk those other sites?
Anyway good luck faking hours and hours of video. I wounder how you would fake 30 minutes of astronauts floating around.
-
4k for a pencil? I think that's exaggerating just a little bit...
-
Pictures I can believe because it's been done flawlessly before photoshop. Video's though, how would you go about that? That's like 1000 pictures for one little video. Right?
It's not like they have to edit it one frame at a time. Well-done CG graphics are indistinguishable from reality. Why couldn't they easily fake those videos, especially when none of us have ever actually seen the Earth from space, and thus have nothing to compare it to when deciding whether a video is fake?
-
Pictures I can believe because it's been done flawlessly before photoshop. Video's though, how would you go about that? That's like 1000 pictures for one little video. Right?
It's not like they have to edit it one frame at a time. Well-done CG graphics are indistinguishable from reality. Why couldn't they easily fake those videos, especially when none of us have ever actually seen the Earth from space, and thus have nothing to compare it to when deciding whether a video is fake?
Not even close to true. CG is not as good as real life yet.
-
What about those images makes you think they accurately represent the earth?
Possibly because none contradict each other, there's clearly no editing, a fisheye is impossible because otherwise the countries would be incredibly misshapen and you say that they're not accurate.
-
Pictures I can believe because it's been done flawlessly before photoshop. Video's though, how would you go about that? That's like 1000 pictures for one little video. Right?
It's not like they have to edit it one frame at a time. Well-done CG graphics are indistinguishable from reality. Why couldn't they easily fake those videos, especially when none of us have ever actually seen the Earth from space, and thus have nothing to compare it to when deciding whether a video is fake?
Not even close to true. CG is not as good as real life yet.
This just shows how little you know about current CG capabilities.
-
Pictures I can believe because it's been done flawlessly before photoshop. Video's though, how would you go about that? That's like 1000 pictures for one little video. Right?
It's not like they have to edit it one frame at a time. Well-done CG graphics are indistinguishable from reality. Why couldn't they easily fake those videos, especially when none of us have ever actually seen the Earth from space, and thus have nothing to compare it to when deciding whether a video is fake?
Not even close to true. CG is not as good as real life yet.
This just shows how little you know about current CG capabilities.
No, it just shows that the FEers think we have incredible technology hidden that can do everything including making antigravity chambers...
-
Pictures I can believe because it's been done flawlessly before photoshop. Video's though, how would you go about that? That's like 1000 pictures for one little video. Right?
It's not like they have to edit it one frame at a time. Well-done CG graphics are indistinguishable from reality. Why couldn't they easily fake those videos, especially when none of us have ever actually seen the Earth from space, and thus have nothing to compare it to when deciding whether a video is fake?
Not even close to true. CG is not as good as real life yet.
This just shows how little you know about current CG capabilities.
No that just shows how little you know. i have at least 5 friends that go to The Art Institute. I have 3dmax 8 and maya on my computer, I let them use it to render. You may be able to slip an object into a scene and have no one notice but you sure as hell are not going to create a 4 hour spacewalk with he earth in the background and have no one notice its CG.
-
CG isn't good enough?
Here is a digital model of the earth you can buy and extort entire nations with for only $398:
http://www.the123d.com/3d-earth.html
-
CG isn't good enough?
Here is a digital model of the earth you can buy and extort entire nations with for only $398:
http://www.the123d.com/3d-earth.html
I'm sure thats exactly what its used for too.
-
CG isn't good enough?
Here is a digital model of the earth you can buy and extort entire nations with for only $398:
http://www.the123d.com/3d-earth.html
It's a hoax. Anyone who uses it or has seen it has been bribed or drugged.
-
Wow. that's incredible. hoax or not, there's no dentying that's a formidable piece of software, if I had a free $400 knocking around the house I'd snap it up
-
They just used 3dmax8. I cant use it but I have it. They just made an image with it.
-
Wow. that's incredible. hoax or not, there's no dentying that's a formidable piece of software, if I had a free $400 knocking around the house I'd snap it up
No, it's definetly a hoax. When you use it you get drugged with magical pixie gas.
-
Oh, those dastardly conspirators and their nefarious drugs! >:(