The Flat Earth Society
Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth Q&A => Topic started by: FEers ftl on March 05, 2007, 09:56:08 AM
-
How did the Earth get flat?
How thick is the Earth then?
-
How did the earth get flat?
I ask you how did the earth get round? it began that way
-
How did the earth get flat?
I ask you how did the earth get round? it began that way
dont go yoda on me, i just asked how in physics did the earth get its flatness when it got formed
-
How did the earth get flat?
I ask you how did the earth get round? it began that way
The earth is round because it is the simplest shape formed in microgravity. And I MUST ask this: WHY IS THERE NO GRAVITATION IN FE?
-
How did the earth get flat?
I ask you how did the earth get round? it began that way
The earth is round because it is the simplest shape formed in microgravity. And I MUST ask this: WHY IS THERE NO GRAVITATION IN FE?
apparently we are accelerating upwards, thats why we stick to the ground
-
But why? It makes no sense. watever, I can't wait for the FE'ers' ezplanation for this one ::)
-
WHY IS THERE NO GRAVITATION IN FE?
Uh, there is. I don't seem to be floating away from my computer.
-
But why? It makes no sense. watever, I can't wait for the FE'ers' ezplanation for this one ::)
trust me they've explained themselves plenty much, just have a look see at the FAQ and some of the topics and you will understand their POV
i am a solid REer just to state the facts
-
WHY IS THERE NO GRAVITATION IN FE?
Uh, there is. I don't seem to be floating away from my computer.
So there IS gravitation, but earth has none for some reason?
Think before you answer, because saying that earth has gravity dicounts universal acceleration as the cause of us not floating into space.
-
So there IS gravitation, but earth has none for some reason?
Think before you answer, because saying that earth has gravity dicounts universal acceleration as the cause of us not floating into space.
I said nothing about gravity. I said the earth has gravitation.
-
WHY IS THERE NO GRAVITATION IN FE?
Uh, there is. I don't seem to be floating away from my computer.
So there IS gravitation, but earth has none for some reason?
Think before you answer, because saying that earth has gravity dicounts universal acceleration as the cause of us not floating into space.
gravity in a FEer mind doesnt exist, everything is accelerating from the big bang
ask Tom Bishop, every girl seems to be accelerating from him
-
WHY IS THERE NO GRAVITATION IN FE?
Uh, there is. I don't seem to be floating away from my computer.
So there IS gravitation, but earth has none for some reason?
Think before you answer, because saying that earth has gravity dicounts universal acceleration as the cause of us not floating into space.
gravity in a FEer mind doesnt exist, everything is accelerating from the big bang
ask Tom Bishop, every girl seems to be accelerating from him
In the FAQ's gravity is used for explanations.
-
i really dont know, ive heard so many different theories, no one is right, just somebody is better at explaining themselves than others
-
Tom Bishop also gave an explanation to how the earth was created. It was "[something] and sheering".
-
Tom Bishop also gave an explanation to how the earth was created. It was "[something] and sheering".
I need a better source than Tom Bishop, we all know why
crack kills
-
Aww, but Tom is so (in a bad way)awesome.
-
Aww, but Tom is so (in a bad way)awesome.
in a sucky way, and seriously Tom and awesome dont mix
-
Aww, but Tom is so (in a bad way)awesome.
in a sucky way, and seriously Tom and awesome dont mix
They do in a bad way.
-
I wonder why, i seriously wonder why Tom sucks so bad, i mean what happened, how did he become such a suckass sucker, how did he lose his masculinity, how young was he when he lost it all. These questions must be held in reverance, in memory of Tom's tortured past
-
The earth became flat through rotational forces and sheers.
-
Gravity is not acceleration. Gravity is just a word that describes some so far unknown phenomenom that causes an acceleration. In FE theory they made it twice as difficult for themselves by adding another unknown force that causes acceleration (UA) and yet still kept gravity in the equation to try and fill a few holes.
-
Gravity is not acceleration. Gravity is just a word that describes some so far unknown phenomenom that causes an acceleration. In FE theory they made it twice as difficult for themselves by adding another unknown force that causes acceleration (UA) and yet still kept gravity in the equation to try and fill a few holes.
A motor can cause acceleration. Therefore motors cause gravity. Refer to Equivalnce Principle.
-
Gravity is not acceleration. Gravity is just a word that describes some so far unknown phenomenom that causes an acceleration. In FE theory they made it twice as difficult for themselves by adding another unknown force that causes acceleration (UA) and yet still kept gravity in the equation to try and fill a few holes.
A motor can cause acceleration. Therefore motors cause gravity. Refer to Equivalnce Principle.
Looks like tom bishop has competition :o
amazing answer
-
we dont accelerate upwards if chuck norris is working out, because we all know that when chuck norris does a push up he doesnt push up, he pushes the earth down
-
we dont accelerate upwards if chuck norris is working out, because we all know that when chuck norris does a push up he doesnt push up, he pushes the earth down
You just started posting here, and already you are getting annoying.
-
im just stating facts my friend
-
Chuck Norris jokes were never funny, and even the people that found them funny stopped thinking they were funny about 2 years ago.
-
This thread has reached it's spam limit - cut it our or off to AR it goes.
-
This thread has reached it's spam limit - cut it our or off to AR it goes.
Thanks for answering the question, Rick James.
-
Far as I know, the origins of a round earth are still under debate.
But that's what I know.
Science has proven that this is more or less equal to nothing.
-
How did the earth get flat?
I ask you how did the earth get round? it began that way
fag
-
I think I have come up with a pretty good theory about how the Earth came to be flat yet everything else of similar size came to be spherical.
(http://img124.imageshack.us/img124/8627/magicls2.jpg)
-
if FE believes the big bang, that means they must believe that explosions cause things to go in all directions
so if things go everywhere, there is no such thing as up
so how are we being "pushed up"????????
also, the explosions must have come from a pressure build up or chemical inbalances (ie a natural explosion) so you cannot disprove that there arn't things "below us" and therefor in space, there is no such thing as up.
and seeing as space is pretty much empty space (yes empty space does exists, because u can make vaccum sealed things where all air was taken out) that means there is nothin to push against, therefore the gases and everything else cannot be held down
if the planet is travelling at a constant speed, we too must travel at that speed (no friction in space so it cannot be disproved). so we are travelling same rate as the planet. there are no forces holding us down because to be held down, we'd need to be pushing against something (which is wat FE says we are doing) so technically, we would just float away according to FE principles
-
if FE believes the big bang, that means they must believe that explosions cause things to go in all directions
For the most part, yes.
so if things go everywhere, there is no such thing as up
Sure there is. It's that way *points up*.
so how are we being "pushed up"HuhHuh??
That's the direction we have defined as up.
you cannot disprove that there arn't things "below us" and therefor in space, there is no such thing as up.
If there is no such thing as up, how can there be a below?
if the planet is travelling at a constant speed, we too must travel at that speed (no friction in space so it cannot be disproved). so we are travelling same rate as the planet. there are no forces holding us down because to be held down, we'd need to be pushing against something (which is wat FE says we are doing) so technically, we would just float away according to FE principles
The earth is accelerating, not traveling at a constant velocity.
-
:) ;) :D ;D >:( :( :o 8) ??? ::) :P :-[ :-X :-\ :-* :'(
-
if FE believes the big bang, that means they must believe that explosions cause things to go in all directions
For the most part, yes.
so if things go everywhere, there is no such thing as up
Sure there is. It's that way *points up*.
so how are we being "pushed up"HuhHuh??
That's the direction we have defined as up.
you cannot disprove that there arn't things "below us" and therefor in space, there is no such thing as up.
If there is no such thing as up, how can there be a below?
if the planet is travelling at a constant speed, we too must travel at that speed (no friction in space so it cannot be disproved). so we are travelling same rate as the planet. there are no forces holding us down because to be held down, we'd need to be pushing against something (which is wat FE says we are doing) so technically, we would just float away according to FE principles
The earth is accelerating, not traveling at a constant velocity.
your logic is still flawed
as a perspective individual, we have a direction. but in the terms of space. directions are impossible because there is nothin to catalogue a direction
we could be travelling down for all you know. it cannot be proved
there is such thing as below even when a direction cannot be initiated. "below" would concern what is behind us as we travel in a certain direction
even if we are accelerating, the faster we go, the more force (if there is one) would be evident on the planet. think of an elevator, the faster u go "up", the more the pull occurs towards the ground object
if we are constantly accelerating and the this forces us to stay on the planet, we would inevitably be crush extremely quickly
-
Aww, but Tom is so (in a bad way)awesome.
wtf is this guy your god or something ? what about hte thousands, MILLIONS, BILLLLLIONS of ppl that believe the earth is round and dont even give it a second thought ? you kno why, because it's well known fact that the earth is round and no one is even worried about people THINKING the earth is flat .. it's not because of a government conspiracy and whatever this tom guy has to say about it cant change the fact the earth is indeed round, that centrifical force exists, that gravity is simply because of the mass of the planet and not because of some retard theory that we're moving upwards
-
The earth became flat through rotational forces and sheers.
WHHATAT !?? LOL the earth became ROUND because of rotational forces and i dont evne kno what sheers are ... your theory needs extreme amounts of work
-
if we are constantly accelerating and the this forces us to stay on the planet, we would inevitably be crush extremely quickly
WE DON'T FEEL VELOCITY. If the acceleration is constant, that is all the force we will feel!
-
if we are constantly accelerating and the this forces us to stay on the planet, we would inevitably be crush extremely quickly
WE DON'T FEEL VELOCITY. If the acceleration is constant, that is all the force we will feel!
wow. you don't know how to read do u???
do u actually understand english?
i just explained this to an 11 year old and he knew what i meant
-
That 11 year old apparently understands physics better than you. Maybe you should stick will psychology, it seems to be more your speed.
-
actually
it show he understands it better than u do mate
don't quit your day job
btw. are you some fat dungeons and dragons nerd thats still a virgin???
the FE people seem that type
you know, the geeks in school who no-one likes so they think "yay, lets not conform"
sorry i get saracastic. after all, i am british :-\
-
don't quit your day job
My day job requires that I know physics.
-
don't quit your day job
My day job requires that I know physics.
wow
how have u not been fired?
do your colleagues laugh at you when you say the earth is flat?
cus i know round most places, you'd be a very lonely person at work
-
don't quit your day job
My day job requires that I know physics.
wow
how have u not been fired?
Perhaps because I know physics.
-
don't quit your day job
My day job requires that I know physics.
wow
how have u not been fired?
Perhaps because I know physics.
haha i love how you avoided the loner bit :P
-
No, but seriously, "self." You're wrong. We don't feel velocity.
~D-Draw
-
haha i love how you avoided the loner bit :P
Yea, ad hominem FTW. ::)
-
we dont feel velocity but we feel acceleration, sit in a car and start to accelerate, you will feel a force but if you stop accelerating this force wont affect you. Its a simple formula. F=m*a
-
haha i love how you avoided the loner bit :P
Yea, ad hominem FTW. ::)
Thats not an Ad Hominem (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem#Background), it would have been if he had said "You're wrong because you're a loner," but instead he essentially said, "You're wrong, and you're a loner"
-
Yes, thereby trying to discredit him. It doesn't have to follow a "you suck so you're wrong" formula. Any personal attack which is unrelated to the issue being debated is an 'ad hominem' attack. Also, this argument is two years old.
-
don't quit your day job
My day job requires that I know physics.
Yeah.. he *snicker*... stacks *giggle*...
oh wait. Engy's right. deldeldeldeldel
"self" close your eyes when you're in a car next. When travelling at a fixed speed, try and see if you can tell if you're mving or not. Probably not, and that's what causes travel sickness. (world moving outside, guts say not moving inside)
-
The big bang was unidirectional, like a cone. This caused the UA to develop; since the earth was still "soft" at some point, the acceleration upwards by the ua flattened it, much like a pizza.
-
if FE believes the big bang, that means they must believe that explosions cause things to go in all directions
How does this even follow? The big bang is not an explosion.
-
The big bang was unidirectional, like a cone. This caused the UA to develop; since the earth was still "soft" at some point, the acceleration upwards by the ua flattened it, much like a pizza.
If you want to disregard inertia - but.. you're also disregarding, that a mass which is accelerating near to the speed of light (and i think noone of you FEers will doubt that we're almost at the speed of light after a few billion years when accelerating with 9,80665 m/s?) will need more, more and even more Force to keep that acceleration because mass increases (in square i think) to speed..
Which would mean, that the "Dark Force" or whatever is also increasing - since billions of years.. yay! i found a perpetuum mobile!
p.s.: oh: and the big bang was a rapid expansion (look up, what a rapid expansion is...)
-
The big bang was unidirectional, like a cone. This caused the UA to develop; since the earth was still "soft" at some point, the acceleration upwards by the ua flattened it, much like a pizza.
If you want to disregard inertia - but.. you're also disregarding, that a mass which is accelerating near to the speed of light (and i think noone of you FEers will doubt that we're almost at the speed of light after a few billion years when accelerating with 9,80665 m/s?) will need more, more and even more Force to keep that acceleration because mass increases (in square i think) to speed..
Which would mean, that the "Dark Force" or whatever is also increasing - since billions of years.. yay! i found a perpetuum mobile!
p.s.: oh: and the big bang was a rapid expansion (look up, what a rapid expansion is...)
Much like how in the RE the acceleration caused by expansion is increasing?
-
The big bang was unidirectional, like a cone. This caused the UA to develop; since the earth was still "soft" at some point, the acceleration upwards by the ua flattened it, much like a pizza.
If you want to disregard inertia - but.. you're also disregarding, that a mass which is accelerating near to the speed of light (and i think noone of you FEers will doubt that we're almost at the speed of light after a few billion years when accelerating with 9,80665 m/s?) will need more, more and even more Force to keep that acceleration because mass increases (in square i think) to speed..
Which would mean, that the "Dark Force" or whatever is also increasing - since billions of years.. yay! i found a perpetuum mobile!
p.s.: oh: and the big bang was a rapid expansion (look up, what a rapid expansion is...)
Much like how in the RE the acceleration caused by expansion is increasing?
I must admit that I have no clue what you're talking about - I don't know anything of an increasing acceleration - hey, I dont even know that the speed at which the solar systems are departing is increasing - why should it?
-
The big bang was unidirectional, like a cone. This caused the UA to develop; since the earth was still "soft" at some point, the acceleration upwards by the ua flattened it, much like a pizza.
You accept evidence of the big bang (forwarded by NASA astronomers) yet chose to ignore the accompanying proposal that the big bang was omnidirectional.
This isn't pick and mix you know.
-
How did the Earth get flat?
How thick is the Earth then?
God made it flat, when he created Earth, animals, dinosaur fossils, the sun and the moon (which are round) and the rest of the universe 7000 years ago.
-
The big bang was unidirectional, like a cone. This caused the UA to develop; since the earth was still "soft" at some point, the acceleration upwards by the ua flattened it, much like a pizza.
You accept evidence of the big bang (forwarded by NASA astronomers) yet chose to ignore the accompanying proposal that the big bang was omnidirectional.
This isn't pick and mix you know.
Really, whether it was omnidirectional or not is irrelevant since we can only see upwards. However, it is a pick and mix; NASA is notorious for threading their lies with truth. One has to be careful what you believe when you listen to NASA.
-
One has to be careful what you believe when you listen to NASA.
if nasa lie so much like snake how are you to know lie from truth?
-
One has to be careful what you believe when you listen to NASA.
if nasa lie so much like snake how are you to know lie from truth?
You have to be a bit smarter than they are.
Don't worry, we'll tell you what they are lying about.
-
One has to be careful what you believe when you listen to NASA.
if nasa lie so much like snake how are you to know lie from truth?
You have to be a bit smarter than they are.
Don't worry, we'll tell you what they are lying about.
yes but I ask you how you are able to know
i did not ask you to tell me what they are lying about like kinergarden school teacher
-
One has to be careful what you believe when you listen to NASA.
if nasa lie so much like snake how are you to know lie from truth?
You have to be a bit smarter than they are.
Don't worry, we'll tell you what they are lying about.
yes but I ask you how you are able to know
i did not ask you to tell me what they are lying about like kinergarden school teacher
You always know if they are lying if you are smarter than they are.
If you can't tell if they are lying, you're dumber than they are and need help.
-
One has to be careful what you believe when you listen to NASA.
if nasa lie so much like snake how are you to know lie from truth?
You have to be a bit smarter than they are.
Don't worry, we'll tell you what they are lying about.
yes but I ask you how you are able to know
i did not ask you to tell me what they are lying about like kinergarden school teacher
You always know if they are lying if you are smarter than they are.
If you can't tell if they are lying, you're dumber than they are and need help.
how do you know you smarter?
if you smarter, this mean they lie all time? or sometimes?
if sometimes, how you know which is time?
-
you are all wrong....the earth is a motherfucking cube! dEAL WITH IT OR GO DIE ALONE!
idiots....
-
how do you know you smarter?
if you smarter, this mean they lie all time? or sometimes?
if sometimes, how you know which is time?
(http://i422.photobucket.com/albums/pp304/Ravenwood240/sigh1.jpg)
Nice troll job, but no one can be this obtuse and stupid while still being able to turn on a computer.
-
Nice troll job, but no one can be this obtuse and stupid while still being able to turn on a computer.
it very simple questions. if you cannot answer it ok you can say
-
Nice troll job, but no one can be this obtuse and stupid while still being able to turn on a computer.
it very simple questions. if you cannot answer it ok you can say
That's the problem idiot. You continually ask simple questions that a five year old can see the answers to. You cannot be that stupid and still able to operate a computer. Therefore, you are attempting to troll for some idiot purpose of your own and I don't have the time to empower your idiocy.
I started with a hypothesis, moved it to a theory and now, I think I have enough evidence to call it confirmed.
You, Sir, are an Idiot.
-
You, Sir, are an Idiot.
more with insults i am thinking your parents bad to you. i so sorry for
if my question are easy for five year old then you can answer then yes?