31

Flat Earth General / Re: List of flaws in RE Theory

« on: December 09, 2012, 11:59:34 AM »

How the moon is lit up during the day.

the sun

32

Flat Earth General / Re: List of flaws in RETheory

« on: December 09, 2012, 11:52:42 AM »

phantom islands are the result of using multiple images to create one, its not even an issue
gravity has been discussed a million times

33

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Geometric Argument against FL "Theory"

« on: December 09, 2012, 11:50:30 AM »

Also, how do FLers explain volcanoes, for example?  If the earth were a disk, the heat driving things like plate tectonics and volcanoes would have long ago been lost to space, unless you're going to tell me there are space dragons keeping it hot....

The UA is actually heating the Earth via direct energy transfer.

Any force that can accelerate the earth close to the speed of light would burn it to a crisp from energy transfers. The whole planet would be a mass of magma.

Incorrect. Nobody is claiming that the universal accelerator is made of matter.

When did I say it was? I only said it was a truly immense force.

Your gravity doesn't burn you to a crisp as you fall. Why should the AW be different?

UA is accelerating earth at close to the speed of light

34

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Geometric Argument against FL "Theory"

« on: December 08, 2012, 10:50:13 PM »

Also, how do FLers explain volcanoes, for example?  If the earth were a disk, the heat driving things like plate tectonics and volcanoes would have long ago been lost to space, unless you're going to tell me there are space dragons keeping it hot....

The UA is actually heating the Earth via direct energy transfer.

another assumption by a FE'er...
do you have any evidence/experiments for that?

35

Flat Earth General / Re: New Leaked Rover Picture

« on: December 08, 2012, 10:43:13 PM »

The animals look dead. The area was clearly dusted with potent poisons to kill off any plant or animal life. I guess the clean up crew missed those guys.

way to jump to conclusion
you are just believing whatever you feel like, there is nothing that shows an area that clearly dusted with potent poisons

36

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Flat Earth Kryptonite

« on: December 07, 2012, 11:10:11 PM »

"Major Twang" clearly has not read Earth Not a Globe. I would recommend that he educates himself before coming here with his crap assumptions.

For reasons we've gone over Rowbotham's text is largely irrelevant.  Its notable for helping to define modern Zeteticism but is largely apocryphal in best cases and wildly inaccurate in most.

Incorrect

care to show how?
hey pongo is this not low content posting?

37

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Curvature of the Earth

« on: December 07, 2012, 10:22:20 PM »

but if the earth is accelerating upwards wouldn't we eventually reach and surpass the speed of light

38

Flat Earth General / Re: New Leaked Rover Picture

« on: December 07, 2012, 10:13:01 PM »

Who said it was a rat?

Have a look at this...this is a prairie dog.



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

wait, so pictures are evidence now?
you are seeing rodent because thats what you want to see
looks could be deceiving

39

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Square earth?

« on: December 07, 2012, 06:54:02 PM »

Major Twang justs owns every thread lol

40

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Fake Space

« on: December 07, 2012, 01:58:56 AM »

dont waste your time with sceptimatic, he believes in things because he wants to and no other reason.

41

Flat Earth General / Re: Ice wall

« on: December 06, 2012, 09:54:14 PM »

yup i have

42

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Flat Earth Kryptonite

« on: December 05, 2012, 01:54:55 AM »

"Major Twang" clearly has not read Earth Not a Globe. I would recommend that he educates himself before coming here with his crap assumptions.

a book is not evidence
if you dont have any evidence to present or at least a quote from the book with explains his "crap evidence" then i suggest you refrain from commenting

43

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Sunlight

« on: December 04, 2012, 10:46:50 PM »

traces of water have been detected on the moon.  and there may be some other gas that can sustain life on the moon

do you not see how you are contradicting yourself?
1) water isnt a gas
2) you are accepting that water was found on the moon
3) you are a FE'er whom isnt supposed to believe that kind of stuff
are you a FE'er? or have i made a mistake

44

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Asteroid Impacts

« on: December 04, 2012, 09:04:22 PM »

well their in fact you are wrong as usual.

You only created an account 3 days ago. What do you mean "as usual?"

Boring people creating account after account to ask boring questions again and again. The thread is all yours. bye.

running away when you cannot answer a question

45

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Venus transition of the sun

« on: December 03, 2012, 10:58:00 PM »

Venus, as does Mercury rarely come closer to the Earth than the sun. 
While Mars and the gas giants never do.
On this rare occasion we can watch the transition.
We can also determine that Venus and Mercury are no larger than 100 meters at most.

thats only if you assume the sun is the size FE says it is

46

Flat Earth General / Re: A zetetic observation... of a round earth

« on: December 03, 2012, 10:48:24 PM »

^ so basically, you will never post a video

47

Flat Earth General / Re: What is wrong in state that the Sun rotates around Earth?

« on: December 03, 2012, 08:11:34 PM »

What are you talking about? He provided no evidence at all. Personal exposition should never be confused for evidence.

its not personal when anyone can see the difference in gravitational pull at different heights. i have yet to see evidence in UA or celestial gears that FE'ers love so much

It's cute that you poke at UA for having no evidence when it has just as much as gravity has: none. The two are interchangeable, even the theory of relativity has a principle admitting this. Furthermore, gravity does not decrease at different heights. The math in the gravity equation says it does, sure, but it doesn't actually do that.

youre doing a horrible troll job
my weight would be less on top of a tall building than at the bottom

48

Flat Earth General / Re: What is wrong in state that the Sun rotates around Earth?

« on: December 03, 2012, 03:16:54 PM »

What are you talking about? He provided no evidence at all. Personal exposition should never be confused for evidence.

its not personal when anyone can see the difference in gravitational pull at different heights. i have yet to see evidence in UA or celestial gears that FE'ers love so much

49

Flat Earth General / Re: What is wrong in state that the Sun rotates around Earth?

« on: December 03, 2012, 01:47:55 PM »

see that rushy, you ask for evidence  and RE'ers provide it
but when you need to provide evidence you say "thers no <blank> because the earth is flat"

50

Flat Earth General / Re: What is wrong in state that the Sun rotates around Earth?

« on: December 03, 2012, 12:54:45 AM »

did you not read the other post? what do you think
the greater the mass the greater the gravitational pull

51

Flat Earth General / Re: What is wrong in state that the Sun rotates around Earth?

« on: December 02, 2012, 10:33:35 PM »

you can observe gravitational pulls with your own eyes
many phenomenas FE describes cannot be observed and seem to be wild guesses to plug in the holes in the theory (aether, celestial gears, UA, ect...)

A couple of weeks ago I placed two marbles on a level table.  One was big and the other was a little smaller.  I did not see them gravitate towards each other, much less orbit around each other.

Mass is proportionate to gravity, right?

the more the mass, the stronger the gravitational pull
the marbles did have a gravitational pull, just one that was to weak to pull them together

52

Flat Earth General / Re: What is wrong in state that the Sun rotates around Earth?

« on: December 02, 2012, 10:31:31 PM »

you can observe gravitational pulls with your own eyes

No, you're observing an action and then assuming it is whatever someone told you it is. Might as well call it the Church of Gravity.

the force is not visible but that doesnt mean it doesnt exist
if you do an experiment with the same result over and over you can use abductive reasoning to draw a conclusion

53

Flat Earth General / Re: What is wrong in state that the Sun rotates around Earth?

« on: December 02, 2012, 10:26:27 PM »

you can observe gravitational pulls with your own eyes
many phenomenas FE describes cannot be observed and seem to be wild guesses to plug in the holes in the theory (aether, celestial gears, UA, ect...)

A couple of weeks ago I placed two marbles on a level table.  One was big and the other was a little smaller.  I did not see them gravitate towards each other, much less orbit around each other.

mass

54

Flat Earth General / Re: What is wrong in state that the Sun rotates around Earth?

« on: December 02, 2012, 09:50:40 PM »

you can observe gravitational pulls with your own eyes
many phenomenas FE describes cannot be observed and seem to be wild guesses to plug in the holes in the theory (aether, celestial gears, UA, ect...)

55

Flat Earth General / Re: What is wrong in state that the Sun rotates around Earth?

« on: December 02, 2012, 09:22:55 PM »

because it magically floats at a constant 3100 miles above earth even though the earth is accelerating upwards and is part of the fairytale celestial gears

As opposed to the Earth being magically pulled around the Sun by invisible, untouchable strings?

the sun has mass and massive objects have gravitational pulls

56

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: A timelapse i would like your response to

« on: December 02, 2012, 12:44:17 AM »

all movies are scripted
youtube has some real footage

57

Flat Earth General / Re: What is wrong in state that the Sun rotates around Earth?

« on: December 02, 2012, 12:04:15 AM »

because it magically floats at a constant 3100 miles above earth even though the earth is accelerating upwards and is part of the fairytale celestial gears

58

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Fake Space

« on: December 01, 2012, 11:58:12 PM »

 

Whatever they were watching blast into the sky, was not a full sized shuttle.
Most probably a mock up composite type.
They can only see it from miles away so it's a perfect foil isn't it.

I should have guessed! How naive of me.

It's not your fault...millions have fell for it.

59

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: How woud a flat earth form?

« on: December 01, 2012, 11:52:06 PM »

this topic isnt about RE, its about FE and is a valid question
so, how was FE formed?

60

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: A timelapse i would like your response to

« on: November 30, 2012, 11:37:58 PM »

unfortunately, you will continue to receive cop out responses