The difference between RET and FET

This is generally what happens when a RE'er answers a question compared to a FE'er.

In RET: RE'er says "It happens because of X," other RE'ers agree with X.


In FET: FE'er says "It happens because of X," another FE'er claims "X is ridiculous, it is because of Y," yet another FE'er creates some sort of convoluted combination and says "No, it is because Y causes X to Z in multiple scenarios."

This is generally what happens when a RE'er answers a question compared to a FE'er.

In RET: RE'er says "It happens because of X," other RE'ers agree with X.


In FET: FE'er says "It happens because of X," another FE'er claims "X is ridiculous, it is because of Y," yet another FE'er creates some sort of convoluted combination and says "No, it is because Y causes X to Z in multiple scenarios."

Because you RE'ers don't know enough about your own theories to argue about them.

Because you RE'ers don't know enough about your own theories to argue about them.

And its definitely not because we have a unified theory and you have such a large maze of made up facts and theories you yourselves get lost in it?  Afterall, if FET actually decided on a unified theory, it would take a one paragraph report to disprove the whole thing. That is why you have to keep your theory in a liquid form. Solidify a flat earth theory and it just shatters in the wind.