You very confusingly use the term "geocentric model" where you really mean the "flat earth model".
The term "geocentric model" is usually used to refer to a model with a fixed non-rotating Globe, with the sun, moon and stars all rotating around it and there are quite a few people that believe that model.
If the earth is orbiting the sun
and the sun with our solar system is moving through our galaxy how is it possible for Polaris to be above the north pole constant when it is meant to be so far away it doesn't even change from summer to winter and where meant to be on opposite sides of the sun.
No problem at all - the stars are a very great distance away!
At the September equinox the earth is about 300,000,000 km from where it was at the March equinox.
The distance, 300,00,000 km, is about 0.00003171 Light Years.
And Polaris is about 433.8 light years away,
so the change of elevation angle of Polaris is
0.00003171/433.8 radians, or 0.0151 arc seconds.
The parallax of a star if the change in angle for an earth movement of one
Astronomical
Unit, which is the average distance of the earth from the sun.
The
Parallax (π) of Polaris is quoted as 7.54 ± 0.11 mas, where
mas is the abbreviation used for
0.001 of an arc second (an
arc second is
1/3600 of a degree).
Note that the angle, 0.0151 arc seconds, we calculated above is close to twice the 7.54 mas quoted for Polaris.
Yes, it all fits the Heliocentric Model very well thank you.
There are many videos online that show most of the stars orbiting around the north pole on the geocentric model there is an image of the above in this link.
http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/08/200-proofs-earth-is-not-spinning-ball.html?m=1
Rebuttals and Refutations, 200 Proofs Earth is Not a Spinning Ball RefutationsOn the geocentric model the stars orbit the earth (un logo) polaris stays above magnetic north (centre) so from the equater it would appear to be on the horizon on the geocentric model also.
I do not believe anything I have not verified for myself (As I'm not religious)
I'm interested in both geocentric and heliocentric models.
You state, "polaris stays above magnetic north".
No, Polaris stays almost above the Geographic North Pole - not that same thing.
But, you say that you "do not believe anything" you "have not verified for myself".
Well, I'm sorry to tell you that there will always be things that you cannot personally verify.
Now, you say that you have videos of (most of?) the stars appearing to rotate about the North Pole, but there are also many videos of the stars rotating about the South Celestial Pole too.
In both the north and the south
they appear to rotate about single points - the North and South Celestial Poles.
As shown in this video:
Startrail & Timelapse 2015 - Northern vs Southern Hemisphere, jungynz's channel
Published on Jan 24, 2016
Time-lapse and star trail video's compiled into a movie - each clip contains around 500 stills rendered using LightRoom and StarStax. The images were taken in summer on the Island of Guernsey UK for the Northern Hemisphere, and the Warrumbungle Ranges near Siding Springs Australia for the Southern Hemisphere.
And here is a very short one taken a few days ago:
Star trails Sydney Australia - P900 facing South, Wolfie6020
Stars in the south behave exactly as in the north except that
in the north, they appear to rotate counterclockwise about the North Celestial Pole (
near Polaris) and
in the south, they appear to rotate clockwise about the South Celestial Pole (
near the faint star Sigma Octantis).
I ought to know that second, I live in the Southern Hemisphere and can see it on any clear night!