1

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Unbiased FE vs RE Poll

« on: March 26, 2007, 01:53:39 PM »

I like to think the world exists in only my own personal perspective and every one of your opinions doesn't actually exist for you only exist through my eyes.

2

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Is there anyway I can profit from the flat earth conspiracy?

« on: March 21, 2007, 01:26:56 PM »

I'm the government's secret benefactor for the great religion of Round-Earth.  If you want money, you talk to me.

3

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Why does the sun go round in a circle?

« on: March 20, 2007, 07:32:53 PM »

In case you didn't notice, this is the FLAT EARTH Society. I believe in the Flat Earth. Why should I remain silent instead of spreading the true theory of the flat earth?

Why do you speak as if it's true - as if you know it as fact?
Even the RE'ers and FE'ers here treat their models as "theories".

Don't blame him.  He was abused as a child.

4

Flat Earth Debate / Re: moon light

« on: March 18, 2007, 06:08:40 PM »

But how?  I thought the U.S. Military would shoot anyone who got close to it?  OH.  The land of the Gnomes must be on the OTHER side of the wall, so they get chunks from the opposite side.  So I support your theory of Cold Fusion.

5

Flat Earth Debate / Re: moon light

« on: March 18, 2007, 06:05:07 PM »

It very well could be.

However, I am a RE'er and do not believe in such things.

But, if I were to guess...I would assume a legion of Gnomes are causing the acceleration by pushing up on the bottom of Earth with their jet-packs.

6

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: formation

« on: March 18, 2007, 06:03:29 PM »

HEY.  I do NOT snivel.

7

Flat Earth Debate / Re: moon light

« on: March 18, 2007, 06:02:26 PM »

So can we measure their distances using Cyclops' laser eyes?

1.) Cyclops doesn't have laser eyes.

2.) Cyclops' eyes emit a special heat-less energy that acts as a concussive force, similar to being punched.  This was established after his initial conception in the 1960s, by Stan Lee whose power physics were very loose, so in the earlier comics his beams would melt things, but they no longer do so.

8

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: formation

« on: March 18, 2007, 06:00:30 PM »

I searched for SMB and found nothing

Where I come from, that means you fail.

9

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Air, and how it contradicts a flat earth

« on: March 18, 2007, 05:59:51 PM »

Most definitely.  We'll need all the energy we can get.

10

Flat Earth Debate / Re: moon light

« on: March 18, 2007, 05:59:04 PM »

But Magneto, that's right isn't it Frenchy? We don't want to make any mistakes with this thing.

Magneto bends the light from the sun into the moon and tricks us into believing that the Earth is round by providing with two magnetic poles.

Using Sue Storm's powers.

11

Flat Earth Debate / Re: moon light

« on: March 18, 2007, 05:57:47 PM »

The space mirrors were obviously created by Magneto, hence his inclusion in the diagram.  How were they created?  Easily explained.

After seeing the hit-television series 'Heroes', Magneto found the man who kills people and takes their powers and killed Sue Storm (the Invisible Woman).  Since she can bend light to make herself invisible and create forcefields, Magneto stole her powers and created 2 space mirrors so the moon would be able to bounce the light from the sun off onto Earth.

I dare you to debate this.

12

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: formation

« on: March 18, 2007, 05:51:28 PM »

GET OUTTA HERE ACADEMIA TROLL

YOU HAVE BEEN EDUCATED STUPID AND EVIL

I CHALLENGE YOU TO REFUTE PLANAR EARTH

Were you abused as a child?

13

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: formation

« on: March 18, 2007, 05:45:05 PM »

What I notice with you, Franc, is that you simply refuse to argue your point when someone says something you don't like.  You constantly resort to childish insults and, in my opinion, must lack the intellectual capacity for factual debate.

14

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Air, and how it contradicts a flat earth

« on: March 18, 2007, 05:34:32 PM »

You're right.  They did believe it was round.  So nevermind, don't see 300.  They were RE'ers.  But man...they kicked ass.  I think we should form a Spartan Phalanx group to combat the demons of Hell that will attack our planet in a mere 91 years.  What say you, SNB?

15

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Air, and how it contradicts a flat earth

« on: March 18, 2007, 05:08:48 PM »

But I'm a skeptic, and therefore welcome.  You, sir, are not a happy person.  Go see a movie.  300 was great.  I think you'd like it.  I believe the Spartans thought the world was flat, too.  You'd like them.

16

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: Internet doesn't exist

« on: March 18, 2007, 05:07:11 PM »

I like the pixie theory.

17

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Air, and how it contradicts a flat earth

« on: March 18, 2007, 04:55:15 PM »

I smell a hypocriiiiiiiiiiit...

18

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Air, and how it contradicts a flat earth

« on: March 18, 2007, 04:51:04 PM »

Wait wait wait.  The Earth goes on forever?

19

Flat Earth Debate / Re: The Flat Earth Conspiracy Conspiracy

« on: March 18, 2007, 04:48:23 PM »

*grabs his sword*

I shall form and train a militia to combat the demons from Hell, me Lord.  Being a Level 16 Fighter/Sorcerer (I multi-classed ), I can train troops in both melee and Arcane-spell-casting combat.  Gentlemen...war is at our doorsteps...it is time we as a people take to arms and forget these petty differences in order to destroy the TRUE evil that rests beneath our feet!  Tonight, we dine in Hell.

------------

To reply with relevance, Franc T., Planar...you sir are acting like a child.  By refusing to stay on topic and state your factually based arguments, you are trolling and spamming yourself.  I find it highly hypocritical of you to do so.  If you wish to be taken seriously and your arguments to be reguarded with any shard of respect, you will answer the questions Skyburn has asked.

If you refuse and reply to my post with something like 'Stay out of this, it isn't your debate', I say to you...you're no longer debating.  Skyburn has won this debate for you consistently refuse to back up your arguments with any factual basis.