Listening is a key skill
Which you appear to entirely lack.
Let's explain geometry to you.
Terrain is geometry.
You ignoring the terrain to claim it is flat is just blatant dishonesty.
This is not just ignoring an insignificant bump. This is ignoring a substantial part of it.
You may as well be claiming a sphere is flat, with a bump on each side.
A circle is equal to 360 degrees
Good, now zoom in on a tiny part of it.
Maybe something like this:
What this means is that for something to be a sphere, it must have a 90 degree rise, or in other words, a rise that is equal in height to half the diameter.
And if you want to see that, you need to be far away.
Alternatively, LOOK DOWN.
Then see that massive amount of Earth that goes from directly below to out in front, that is part of that bulge you are trying to find.
Here is a picture to help you understand:
Which way do you need to look to see that bulge?
If you wish to disagree, feel free to draw yourself standing on Earth and showing what way you think you should need to look.
Suppose there even is this bulge that you have never been able to prove
The curvature of Earth has been proven beyond any sane doubt.
You have been completely incapable of explaining away observations which demonstrate it.
We even have pictures from space:
https://epic.gsfc.nasa.gov/Does that prove Earth is a sphere?
No, but the fact that it is quite comparable anywhere on Earth makes it quite likely to be roughly spherical.
We also have the shadow of Earth on the moon during a lunar eclipse to further support this.
And as above, we have pictures of Earth from space.
The Earth's diameter is 7000 MILES. Half of this is a midpoint curve so profound that it would cause water to hill in either direction like the Red Line.
What red line? And So what?
Excuse me, but I have driven 3000 miles. I know for a fact that there was never any such curve in all that distance.
How?
Based upon your blatant misrepresentation that Earth should behave like a tiny ball, so you should feel like you are climbing a massive mountain; rather than an honest representation of what a level CURVED surface should act like?
This is why RE liars always default to "The Earth is really an elliptoid not a sphere,"
And more delusional BS.
The reason HONEST PEOPLE say that Earth is not a perfect sphere, and it is closer to an oblate spheroid or ellipsoid, is because that is the truth.
Due to the minimal eccentricity, a sphere is a good approximation.
A chess board that has a huge mound of dirt on it, is nonetheless a chess board. If I drench it in water, and the wood bows, it is a warped chess board. If you added more wood give it a large bump, you could maybe say it's a different shape by design, and call it a domed chess board. But this bump is not a thing, stop trying to make it a thing.
And again deflecting from the shape.
Not a chessboard with a mound of dirt, a chessboard with a massive bump in the middle.
I don't care if it would still be a chess board, would it still be flat?
Notice how if it bows, you say it is warped, which is another way of saying not flat.
This "bump" IS a thing. It is the terrain you keep on ignoring.
Meanwhile, I continued my education after college, eventually learning that much of what I was told was crap.
You mean after failing miserably at college you started to de-educate yourself, discarding most of what you learnt as crap.
Not for any rational basis of by actual education, but because you don't like it.
This country is becoming broken, and its days are numbers.
Yes, by people like you.
People who care more about individual liberty than not harming others.
I wamt to abolish those syatems, not regulate.
And it doesn't really matter what you want.
These companies want these systems, because it makes them money.
Why would they stop it just because you want it?
Do you mean you want to force companies to not be able to use those systems? Because that is regulation. You would be regulating companies to prohibit them from doing something.
But because those systems are now dependent on chips that shouldn't have been allowed for a free market economy
No, they shouldn't have been allowed in a regulated economy that cares about end users and their right to own and repair their own products.
But in a free market they are permitted entirely. And then the buyers collective decide with their wallets if they accept it or not.
When you scratch the leftist, they are never about rights, and always about regulation.
And just how do you plan on ensuring those rights without regulation?
The point of regulations is to give you those rights and ensure the companies can't take it away.
The only time I ever want regulation is when the rights have already been lost
At which point it is often too late and you are fighting a losing battle.
It is far better to have those regulations in place prohibiting the destruction of the right before the right is lost.
No, ban the devices restricting freedom
i.e. REGULATE the companies to prohibit them from producing certain products.
Do you understand what regulations are?
For a supposed anti-trust leftist, you're awfully concerned with having businesses preserve their right to monopolize the repairs and manufacture of cars.
Are you sure?
Because I fully support the right to repair and think companies should be obligated (i.e. regulations should exist which require companies to) provide schematics of their products and repair manuals, as well as providing parts; or if they don't, then they should be obligated to repair a device (or replace it with an equivalent or better model, with all features the same or improved) for free.
What this is vastly more likely to be doing is pointing out your hypocrisy.
You claim to oppose regulation, wanting things to be free; but then you cling to things which would require regulation to work.
What we "want" is for you to recognise that you are promoting and calling for regulation of companies to prohibit them from doing certain things; so you can recognise that not all regulation is bad.
But again, this is not the thread for that.
Using my distractibility to keep from answering my question.
Then just stop with all the BS about regulation and focus on your question.
You were the one that decided to bring up right to repair.