You (FEers) say that you think earth is flat because it looks flat, so you are basically stating that you should trust your eyes to tell you the truth about the world around you. But when you are asked about sunsets you claim that perspective and bendy light are making you see something happening that isn't actually happening. In other words, you say that you can't trust your eyes.
This kind of logic makes no sense to me. You basically just contradict yourselves to make your theory work. At one moment your eyes tell you the truth and at the next they don't?
Can a FEer please explain how this works in their mind?
In reference to "FE Logic ?" this was received in an e-mail from another source.:
Quote Without Comment:
"And, yes, I've not only heard of but heard from the flat-nutter-earthers. I thought the young Earth creationists were bad enough expecting Bronze-Age scribblings to bear any resemblance to reality but these flat-earther folks are wholly and willfully ignorant. It truly beggars belief and, in many ways, demonstrates an astonishing arrogance that these folks have no problem using the results of science (they have no problem exploiting quantum physics w/o which they could never post a web page) while simultaneously denying its conclusions about reality. In my view, it's an infantile grasping at the perceived security of the misguided belief that humans are somehow the center and purpose of the Universe. Pathetic, really."
Just for the record,these were not my words. Personally, I thought it was a bit extreme, but it seems to express the opinion of the majority in regard to the Flat Earth Society to some extent.