AbdulAziz Proving The Existence Of God

Quote

Every religious person is blind to his own religions' absurdities. I doubt you could find one monotheistic person on the planet who doesn't believe that.

Also, you might enjoy paging through this:
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/Quran/

Well that might be true in some cases but not all

it’s not fair to judge a book by it’s cover, read the contents of the book then judge. You guys should read first the Quran and the authentic books of Islam.

Don’t just judge Islam by it’s cover or because of some black sheep. If I invented a perfect car, however the driver was a bad driver and he crushed the car, will you blame me and say your car is worst!

But before that I hope you do search well like www.answering-christianity.com and other websites which are dedicated to answer false claims against Quran. If you are lazy or not interested to do so, you can always take one topic of that website you gave, post it in a separate topic and In Sha Allah I will answer

Oh Chris, if you really wish to learn regardless of how bad is the teacher you would do your best to learn, if you are having exam in the few next days, and the teacher gave you slides and articles to read, he failed to explain the slides, articles…etc you shouldn’t give up just because the teacher failed and was bad, you would hold the papers yourself and read so you can answer in the upcoming exam.

This is the chance gentlemen, its Impossible logically and by pure reasoning that blind chance prevent error of over billions of attempts to create and arrange one Protein molecule!

Quote

Now, consider this:  If these devices were given the ability to reproduce, as soon as a glitch occurs in the process, a slight change in the design will occur.  This will continue to happen as long as the devices reproduce, and these devices would evolve based on whatever conditions favour the slight changes.  If a reproducing jumbo jet survives better going faster, then it would eventually evolve into a plane that is better suited for speed.

Well I am not sure if you are aware of what you wrote but I assume you are. First of all you said it yourself, “were given” a device can’t give itself such ability or feature before it exists, there should be someone who gave it that feature, that ability of reproducing. While the second part of what you said you better read my previous posts in this topic.

Quote

If God was perfect, and he wanted humans to exist and could create them right off the bat, why would he make a creature that changes with every generation when he can create an asexually multiplying race of beings to live in god made homes being happy and praying to him?  Why make them even reproduce?  Why not just make another God?

As I said to Lorddave, we can’t know why God did this or that, however if we know Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise, Perfect…etc we wouldn’t even ask him this question, Human would never understand how God thinks. In fact we humans can't even understand each others well otherwise there wouldn't be any conflict in our world. It's because we don't understand each others such fights and conflicts exists. If we humans (Who can never be compared to God) can't understand each others how we would understand God's acts. Imagine a father having a son with serious sickness where he should cut his son's leg or his son would die. Even though it pains the father to cut his son's leg but he knows it's for his best. So when you see something you can't bear in this world, don't say God is not merciful or he is what you called, just because you don't know the wisdom behind God's acts you shouldn't unnecessary inappropriate titles and attributes. We may understand one reason why God allowed one thing to happen but we can never know all the reasons.  This happens even in our life, an author in his words he meant a lot of things but the reader only discovered 2 wisdoms behind the words of author while another discovered 10. If you are still having difficulty to understand this part, please let me know I will try to explain more.

Before commenting on your posts, I would request you to kindly post all the questions you asked me which some of you claimed that I ignored

Allah fails the tests.
God does not depend on anything yes?
But God depends on Angela to spread his messages to a human( Gabriel spoke to Mohommed). And he needs humans to spread his word. He has had a few prophets but never has he spoken to all humans and given them his word.
Therefore God depends on Angels and Prophets. And thus fails one of the four tests.

And why do you keep implying that I'm insane?

If someone thought their own religion was absurd, they wouldn't keep it

I wouldn't say it was the worst, but I would need proof it was the best.
(I say 'best' because perfection doesn't exist.)

If I pour water on top of a valley, is it random chance that it will end up at the bottom?

This point has been made before, will you drop this ignorant blind chance argument, now?

You cannot claim that reproduction did not arise from a series of chemical reactions, and I can't claim that God didn't create the universe, because neither of us were there to witness it.  You can use logic all you want, but logic is nothing without evidence.

If there is a specific point that you want me to notice that somehow shows how I'm wrong, please point it out.

1. I asked why god created the devil. You said it is not our place to question god. This dismisses the question without actually addressing its substance.

Obviously I will never stop questioning god, so telling me not to makes less sense than giving me a decent answer. That is, assuming you have one.

2. Here is one that I'm not sure if you missed, or thought to be rhetorical. It is basically saying that whatever gives every indication that it is a certain way, should be assumed to be that way until new evidence or reasoning overrules it.
For instance, if "genocide by natural diseases/disasters/etc" strikes everyone as immoral, they should not be assumed to be moral simply because they were god's action. To assume the opposite is to dismiss reasoning to favor a preconceived conclusion, which is an admission to compromising your own investigative integrity.

Did I misunderstand this? It sounds like the only motivation/drive for virtue that you acknowledge is faith.

how can you say they consider it false? Is this just flat out denial on your end? 

The "theory" of gravity is also a "fact".

God exerts 0 detectable influences on the human race in any and all demonstrable forms. Both induction and common sense tells us that the only things that have no influence are things that do not exist.

If you can't create something you do not possess and God created Evil, does that mean God has evil in him?

As we have said before the universe having a beginning means that the universe was brought into being out of nothing, that is, that it was created. If a created thing exists (which did not exist beforehand), then it certainly should have a Creator. Being from non-being is something inconceivable to the human mind. Therefore, being from non-being is very different from bringing objects together to form a new object (such as works of art or technological inventions). It is a sign of Allah's Creation alone that everything formed perfectly all at once and in a single moment, when the created things had no previous examples and not even time and space existed in which to create them.

The coming of the universe into being from non-being is the greatest proof possible that it has been created. Consideration of this fact will change a lot of things. It helps people understand the meaning of life and review their attitudes and purposes. This is why many scientific communities have tried to disregard the fact of Creation which they could not fully comprehend, even though its evidence was clear to them. The fact that all scientific evidence points to the existence of a Creator has compelled them to invent alternatives and thus create confusion in the minds of people. Nevertheless, the evidence of science itself puts a definite end to these theories.

Now, let us take a brief look at the scientific developmental process through which the universe came about.

THE EXPANSION OF THE UNIVERSE
In 1929, the American astronomer Edwin Hubble, working at the California Mount Wilson observatory, made one of the most important discoveries in the history of astronomy. Observing a number of stars through his huge telescope, he discovered that their light was shifted towards the red end of the spectrum and, crucially, that this shift was directly related to the distance of the stars from earth. This discovery had an electrifying effect in the world of science, because according to the recognized rules of physics, the spectra of light beams travelling towards the point of observation tend towards violet while the spectra of light beams moving away from the point of observation tend towards red. During Hubble's observations, the light from stars was discovered to tend towards red. This meant that they were constantly moving away from us.

Before long, Hubble made another important discovery; The stars weren't just racing away from Earth; they were racing away from each other as well. The only conclusion that could be derived from a universe where everything moves away from everything else is that the universe constantly "expands".

To better understand, the universe can be thought of as the surface of a balloon being blown up. Just as the points on the surface of a balloon move apart from each other as the balloon is inflated, so do the objects in space move apart from each other as the universe keeps expanding.

In fact, this had been theoretically discovered even earlier. Albert Einstein, who is considered the greatest scientist of the century, had concluded after the calculations he made in theoretical physics that the universe could not be static. However, he had laid his discovery to rest simply not to conflict with the widely recognised static universe model of his time. Later on, Einstein was to identify his act as "the greatest mistake of his career". Subsequently, it became definite by Hubble's observations, that the universe expands.

What importance, then, did the fact that the universe expands have on the existence of the universe?

The expansion of the universe implied that if it could travel backwards in time, the universe would prove to have originated from a single point. The calculations showed that this "single point" that harboured all the matter of the universe should have "zero volume" and "infinite density". The universe had come about by the explosion of this single point with zero volume. This great explosion that marked the beginning of the universe was named the "Big Bang" and the theory started to be so called.

It has to be stated that "zero volume" is a theoretical expression used for descriptive purposes. Science can define the concept of "nothingness", which is beyond the limits of human comprehension, only by expressing it as "a point with zero volume". In truth, "a point with no volume" means "nothingness". The universe has come into being from nothingness. In other words, it was created.

The Big Bang theory showed that in the beginning all the objects in the universe were of one piece and then were parted. This fact, which was revealed by the Big Bang theory was stated in the Qur'an 14 centuries ago, when people had a very limited knowledge about the universe:

Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of Creation), before We clove them asunder? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe? (Chapter al-Anbiya, 30)

As stated in the verse, everything, even the "heavens and the earth" that were not yet created, were created with a Big Bang out of a single point, and began shaping the present universe by being parted from each other. When we compare the information given in the verse with the Big Bang theory, we see that they fully agree with each other. However, the Big Bang was introduced as a scientific theory only in the 20th century.  The expansion of the universe is one of the most important pieces of evidence that the universe was created out of nothing. Although this fact was not discovered by science until the 20th century, Allah has informed us of this reality in the Qur'an revealed 1,400 years ago:

It is We Who have built the universe with (Our creative) power, and, verily, it is We Who are steadily expanding it. (Surat adh-Dhariyat, 47)

The Army Inside Man
Every day, a war is fought in the innermost parts of your body unperceived by you. On the one side are viruses and bacteria that aim to intrude into your body and take it under control and on the other are the immunity cells that protect the body against these enemies.

The enemies wait in an offensive state to make their way into the area they aim at and they head towards the target area at the first opportunity. However, the strong, organised and disciplined soldiers of the target area do not easily give in to the enemies. First, the soldiers who swallow and neutralise the enemy soldiers (phagocytes) arrive at the battleground. However, sometimes the fight is tougher than these soldiers can handle. On such occasions, other soldiers (macrophages) are summoned up. Their involvement causes alarm in the target area and other soldiers (helper T cells) are also called to battle.

These soldiers are very familiar with the local populace. They quickly distinguish their own army from that of the enemy. They immediately activate the soldiers assigned to weapon production (B cells). These soldiers have extraordinary abilities. Although they never see the enemy, they can produce weapons which will render the enemy ineffectual. In addition, they carry the weapons they produce as far as they should be taken. During this journey, they succeed in the difficult task of not causing any harm either to themselves or to their allies. Later, the striker teams cut in (killer T cells). These discharge the poisonous material they carry on themselves at the most vital spot of the enemy. In case of victory, another group of soldiers arrives at the battleground (suppressor T cells) and sends all the warriors back to their camp. The soldiers who arrive at the battleground last (memory cells) record all relevant information about the enemy, so that it can be used in the event of a similar invasion in the future.

The excellent army discussed above is the immune system in the human body. Everything explained above is done by microscopic cells unobservable to the naked eye.

How many people are aware that they have such an organised, disciplined and perfect army inside their bodies? How many of them are aware that they are surrounded on all sides by microbes that, if unimpeded, would cause them to catch serious illnesses or even die? Indeed, there are many dangerous microbes in the air we breathe, the water we drink, the food we eat, and the surfaces we touch. While one is unaware of all that is going on, the cells in one's body make strenuous efforts to save one from an illness that may even bring about one's death.

The ability of all immunity cells to distinguish enemy cells from body cells, the ability of B cells to prepare a weapon to neutralise the enemy that they have never seen, their ability to carry these weapons as far as they have to be taken without adversely affecting any body cells, the signal-receiving cells' fulfilling their duty completely without making any objections, each of them knowing what to do, their returning to their places without any problem as soon as they are finished with their work, and the abilities of the memory cells are only some of the distinctive characteristics of this system.

For all these reasons, the story of the formation of the immunity system is never taken up by any evolutionist writer.
It is extremely difficult for a person without an immunity system or with an ill-functioning one to survive, since he would be exposed to all the microbes and viruses in the outside world. Today, such people can exist only in special enclosures with no direct contact with anyone or anything outside. Therefore, it is impossible for a person without an immunity system to survive in a primitive environment. This leads us to the conclusion that an extremely complex system such as the immune system could only have been created all at once and with all of its elements intact.

Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of Creation), before We clove them asunder? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe? (Chapter al-Anbiya, 30)

You can pick verses that happen to be congruent with reality all you like, but it gets far more wrong and they get swepped under the rug by believers.
Its like cold reading for the universe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_reading

Quote

God exerts 0 detectable influences on the human race in any and all demonstrable forms. Both induction and common sense tells us that the only things that have no influence are things that do not exist.

I didn’t understand the question, can you please rephrase it if you don’t mind. Thanks in advance

Quote

Allah fails the tests.
God does not depend on anything yes?
But God depends on Angela to spread his messages to a human( Gabriel spoke to Mohommed). And he needs humans to spread his word. He has had a few prophets but never has he spoken to all humans and given them his word.
Therefore God depends on Angels and Prophets. And thus fails one of the four tests.

I guess I didn’t explain well what I mean by depend, when I say depend it’s as if you can’t do something but only when you are depending on someone else. When I said the universe is dependent I meant dependent on something so it can be created, it cannot be created if there was no creator, the ball will not move if nothing kicked or moved the ball, so it’s dependent on something else. God doesn’t depend on angels in way that he can’t do that without them, in fact using angels as messengers, using prophets as messengers are signs of his perfections. Suppose I was king and I wanted to deliver a message to my people, I wouldn’t go to each one of them and tell them about my words instead I will send my servants to do the job. Another example, you can eat “Dog’s Shit” however once you do so you insulted yourself. God can deliver his messages to people however having billions of Angels serving him, having Prophets, having such kingdom it shows Allah’s greatness not Allah’s weakness that he needs something. That’s why I always repeat the same thing, it’s important to know the qualities and attributes of God. As I told you Allah will never fail the tests I mentioned 

You are again comparing your ability with that of God that’s why you are always having some difficulty in understanding. Anyway I will prove you that’s not the case, for example I am a scientist and I have invented a knife to cut fruits…etc am I evil because I did so people can kill themselves using that knife. God can create what seems to us and perceived by us evil but he will never be evil or have evil in him as you described. Allah can take me both and you and throw us to heaven or hell but that would be against his wisdom, justice…etc because two different things can’t be the same, if you for example are denying his existence and you are insulting god while I am praising him and sacrificing my life for his sake then we both get the same result then God is not fair, being unfair is an ungodly attribute thus our God (Allah) can’t be having this quality. To further understand about the act, read my answer to one of ﮎingulaЯiτy ‘s question.

Ok that’s correct, but if you see God’s creation, from them you can get more of God’s qualities, for example if I created something very heavy to lift, Billion tons that mean I am strong because I was able to create it, if I created a robot and gave it a voice that means I can talk and I understand talks….etc

As we have said before the universe having a beginning means that the universe was brought into being out of nothing, that is, that it was created. If a created thing exists (which did not exist beforehand), then it certainly should have a Creator.

Being from non-being is something inconceivable to the human mind. Therefore, being from non-being is very different from bringing objects together to form a new object (such as works of art or technological inventions). It is a sign of Allah's Creation alone that everything formed perfectly all at once and in a single moment, when the created things had no previous examples and not even time and space existed in which to create them.

The coming of the universe into being from non-being is the greatest proof possible that it has been created.

Now, let us take a brief look at the scientific developmental process through which the universe came about.

It is We Who have built the universe with (Our creative) power, and, verily, it is We Who are steadily expanding it. (Surat adh-Dhariyat, 47)

Blahdiblah

For all these reasons, the story of the formation of the immunity system is never taken up by any evolutionist writer.

It is extremely difficult for a person without an immunity system or with an ill-functioning one to survive, since he would be exposed to all the microbes and viruses in the outside world. Today, such people can exist only in special enclosures with no direct contact with anyone or anything outside. Therefore, it is impossible for a person without an immunity system to survive in a primitive environment. This leads us to the conclusion that an extremely complex system such as the immune system could only have been created all at once and with all of its elements intact.

Please correct me, are you claiming there is no blind chance, but an intended chance?

Before commenting on your posts if they require comments, is there any question you claim I ignored

Quote from: AbdulAziz on July 13, 2011, 04:09:19 AM

Before commenting on your posts if they require comments, is there any question you claim I ignored

You don't ignore questions. Only answers.

Quote from: Demouse on July 13, 2011, 04:48:30 AM

Quote from: AbdulAziz on July 13, 2011, 04:09:19 AM

Before commenting on your posts if they require comments, is there any question you claim I ignored

You don't ignore questions. Only answers.

Thou Can't give what thou does not have.

Yes, see: virtual particles and quantum foam.

That's if you excluded 'created by natural causes' like sand dunes or mountains.

How would you convince someone else I exist (assuming I'm not in the room)?

Quote

You cannot claim that reproduction did not arise from a series of chemical reactions, and I can't claim that God didn't create the universe, because neither of us were there to witness it.  You can use logic all you want, but logic is nothing without evidence.

You said it, you can’t claim that God didn’t create the universe, however if we can logically and by reasoning prove that he exists, by pure reason that the book he revealed cannot be from humans but only from God then the words in that book will be evidence for us how the universe was created, what will happen in the future…etc it’s many things related but once collected and you have proved obviously that he exists then you will have evidence.
For example if I was a king and I wanted you to do a task, however I sent a messenger to give you the letter where I wrote the task in, first you have to know if I do exists, once you have collected all the logical reasons why he I should exists, then you have to prove that letter is written by me and is truly my words and it cannot be words from others, then you can proceed in doing the task.

Quote from: AbdulAziz on July 13, 2011, 01:07:50 AM

Quote

You cannot claim that reproduction did not arise from a series of chemical reactions, and I can't claim that God didn't create the universe, because neither of us were there to witness it.  You can use logic all you want, but logic is nothing without evidence.

You said it, you can’t claim that God didn’t create the universe, however if we can logically and by reasoning prove that he exists, by pure reason that the book he revealed cannot be from humans but only from God then the words in that book will be evidence for us how the universe was created, what will happen in the future…etc it’s many things related but once collected and you have proved obviously that he exists then you will have evidence.
For example if I was a king and I wanted you to do a task, however I sent a messenger to give you the letter where I wrote the task in, first you have to know if I do exists, once you have collected all the logical reasons why he I should exists, then you have to prove that letter is written by me and is truly my words and it cannot be words from others, then you can proceed in doing the task.

So, in proving the existence of God, what is, in your opinion, the most compelling argument for his existence? Or for his existence as described by the Quran? (I already believe in God, so in debating with me, your opposition is not in fact arguing that God does not exist)  I apologize if you've said it, and I've probably already read it, but it's a difficult task deciding which arguments to consider first.  I hope to keep this discussion as efficient as possible.

Quote

1. I asked why god created the devil. You said it is not our place to question god. This dismisses the question without actually addressing its substance.

Obviously I will never stop questioning god, so telling me not to makes less sense than giving me a decent answer. That is, assuming you have one.

Well the answer consists of two parts, the first part is that if you are someone who believes in God’s existence, if you are someone who believes in his names, attributes and qualities then you don’t need to ask this question, the moment you ask it means you don’t have faith in what you believed.

Second part, which I am not sure if I understood your question well, I think you are asking about the wisdoms behind this act (El Hekma) why he did this, well we as humans can’t discover all the wisdoms behind God’s acts, I explained that before you may refer to my previous posts.

However I as AbdulAziz can give you with some reasons. First of all if God didn’t create the devils we wouldn’t know who is siding with God and who is siding with the devil and based on this the reward he/she may receive.

Another reason without the devil, atheists wouldn’t deny the existence of God, without devil there will not be Muslims!

Without the devils and the fact that he encourages human being to do bad deeds you wouldn’t appreciate the good deeds, as they say you cannot appreciate the beauty of day if there was no darkness.

for example we know Allah is creator because he created us

Without the devil we wouldn’t know the names of almighty God, [...] if the devil wasn’t created we wouldn’t learn.

I know you might ask why Allah want his servants to fight for him, submit their will, worship him…etc well he doesn’t need them Allah is perfect without us, he is perfect with us, he is Always perfect. However for example if I am great king, I know I am perfect and great, however what is better to be king or to have kingdom, billions of servants, billions of…etc another example, if I am a great painter, the perfect painter, it’s always better to have beautiful painting instead of just calling myself a great painter. Hope I didn’t fail in answering your question.

I guess I grasped what you are trying to say. You should know that actions are related to two things, one from God’s view (I don’t know how to use the exact world to translate what I want to say) and the other is from the Human’s view. For example it’s God that allowed a certain thing to happen say for example that I kill a human being, from the humans or my point of view this action is wrong and the result for me is wrong so I shouldn’t be happy about it and I should change it and don’t give up saying it’s what God willed because God already told us what God likes and dislikes. However from God’s view when he allowed such act its not totally evil, he might allowed my killing to give chance for other humans to be brave to help the innocent, to take me to justice, to show people the result of bad deeds…etc there can be thousands other good reasons compared to the one seeming bad act. For example, we sometimes hate to take medicine but because we know the many advantages of this medicine we take it. I wish I did understand your question well if not please can you explain in another way.

Quote

how can you say they consider it false? Is this just flat out denial on your end? 

There are many websites I posted in my previous posts that quotes saying of great scientiests that’s refusing the idea, for example you can read http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/arguments.shtml and you can read hundreds of articles here http://www.harunyahya.com/en.m_categorie_76.php the man have great awareness about them. However if you mean a specefic dedicated self-approved organization it’s something else.

The Quran is in agreement with most known scientific fact and does not contradict any known ones

I will post numerous quotes from the scientific community regarding the nature and the origins of the Quran. French physician Maurice Bucaille said: “Our knowledge of these disciplines is such that it is impossible to explain how a text produced at the time of the Quran could have contained ideas that have only been discovered in modern times”. Keith L. Moore said: “It is clear to me that these statements must have come to Muhammad from God because almost all of this knowledge was not discovered until many centuries later.” Tejatet Tejasen said: “From my studies and what I have learnt at this conference I believe that everything that has been recorded in the Quran 1400 years ago must be true. That can be proved through the scientific way". E. Marshal Johnson said: “The Quran describes not only the development of external form but emphasizes also the internal stages -- the stages inside the embryo of its creation and development, emphasizing major events recognized by contemporary science... If I were to transpose myself into that era, knowing what I do today and describing things, I could not describe the things that were described... I see no evidence to refute the concept that this individual Muhammad, had to be developing this information from some place... so I see nothing in conflict with the concept that divine intervention was involved..."  T.V.N. Persaud said: “Muhammad was a very ordinary man. He couldn’t read, didn’t know how to write, in fact he was an illiterate... we’re talking about 1400 years ago, you have some illiterate person making profound statements that are amazingly accurate, of a scientific nature... I personally can’t see how this could be mere chance, there are too many accuracies and like Dr. Moore I have no difficulty in my mind reconciling that this is a divine inspiration or revelation which led him to these statements". What I am trying to say established fact that was proved can never contradicts Quran or Allah.

Quote

God exerts 0 detectable influences on the human race in any and all demonstrable forms. Both induction and common sense tells us that the only things that have no influence are things that do not exist.

I didn’t understand the question, can you please rephrase it if you don’t mind. Thanks in advance

If it is the word of an infalliable omnipotent and omnicient being then it has to get EVERYTHING right. Accidentally sort of coming close to reality sometimes is not good enough.

For you.

What I believe he means here is that your god exerts no influence on the universe that we can detect, and only things which do no not exists exert no influence.

You are comparing God to Mortal Kings.  You can't do that.  The power of mortal Kings to have servants is beyond the power of God.
I think it is YOU who do not understand Allah.

Oh and a King can address his people without servants.  A King has Television and mass media.  You want us to believe God has such power yet he is merciful and wise so he uses an angel to speak to a man and wait for that message to be delivered to the people of the world all the while billions of souls are lost to Hell for not hearing the word of Mohommed who claims to be speaking for Gabriel, who claims to be speaking for God?

If I were to say that Gabriel has given me a message from God last night to say to you, would you not doubt me?  What proof could I offer besides what you have offered?
 You would question why God did not speak to you directly would you not?

And so do I.

By your own words, if you create something then you must possess that ability.

Also: Who are you to question God's will?  You claim that his will is unknown yet here you are, AGAIN, claiming to know what an all wise being would do.  Are you all wise?  If the all mighty throws us both into Heaven or Hell then who are you to question him?  You are NOTHING!  You are but a mere slave and his will is your bidding.  If he bid you be thrown into Hell with me then his wisdom is beyond your understanding. But you believe otherwise don't you?  You believe you are wiser than God.  You believe you know what God will do because of your definition of Justice even though you have claimed time and time again that we can not imagine what Justice is for God.

Once more, the net amount of mass/energy in the universe is mathematically zero. Nothing has been 'created' or 'destroyed' merely changed states as is consistent with what we know about quantum physics (See quantum foam and vacuum energy)

Secondly, it is not a sign of Allah's creation but an example of the principle that 'nothing' is unstable, as has been described before.

I promise you that most of us here understand the Big Bang theory a hell of a lot better than you do with your copypasta.

Well this is awkward, because the expansion of the universe is not steady, Hubble's observations demonstrate that it is expanding and accelerating.

Bullshit plain and simple. This is the result of a five-second google, http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2009/05/01/the-evolution-of-the-immune-system/

It would be impossible today for a city to survive for long without a fire service and look at all those trucks, men, call centres, satelite uplinks, equipment, fire alarms etc etc etc can we then conclude that New York City and London have always existed as they are today with a fully functioning fire service? Of course not, the fire service has grown in synchronisation with the city to respond to the city's needs, just as a 1940s fire service couldn't hope to keep a modern London safe, so an immune system from 10,000 years ago couldn't protect a modern human.

It isn't 'chance' at all! We can accurately simulate golf, buildings, explosions, the movement of planets, the synthesis of protein, the splitting of cells, the movement of water, the expansion of gas, the flow of electricity etc etc because they're all beholden to the phisical proprties of the universe around us!

Thou Can't give what thou does not have.

Well that explains why he can't give me a valid reason for believing in god.

can something exist without being created?

Yes, see: virtual particles and quantum foam.