You suggested a vague second hand claim that some people say some stuff about Southern Hemisphere flights.
I said the only such arguments I’ve seen claim these flights don’t exist. Or “denying their existence”, if you like.
Well you still had to be prompted to acknowledge that. So yeah, I stand by what I said. You evidently knew FEers made those arguments given you have a response, but you still started off by claiming they don't insist on any inconsistencies.
I’m sorry, what am I doing wrong now?
I needed prompting to acknowledge a particularly bad flat earth claim that is easily demonstrably false?
Well, I wouldn’t normally throw in such a claim to dispute unprompted, because then I’d be committing a straw man fallacy. Which I have absolutely no doubt you would pick up on, since accusing “round earthers” of making bad arguments is totally your thing.
For the record, I suggested flat earthers should FIND inconsistencies (ideally be able to demonstrate them so that others can confirm). I didn’t say they don’t insist on them.
But NOOOO, you expect me to respond to arguments I haven’t even seen.
No, I don't. I expect you to, if you are going to make a claim about FET, respond to actual FEer statements rather than needing to be prompted to even acknowledge their existence. If you want to be convincing there's a search function, take your time. You're the one that's chosen to make claims about what FEers say, don't throw a tantrum when you're called out for taking the laziest possible route.
Yeah, yeah. The usual stuff.
But, wait! Let’s check the topic of this conversation, shall we?
It’s about apparent inconsistencies in cosmology. Specifically an SA article, presented (some might say misrepresented) by Jeranism about observations in the distant universe compared to the predictions of GR and quantum field theory.
Do you have any problem with Tom and John essentially saying “scientists can’t explain everything, so nothing can be trusted”? I don’t see you admonishing them for not properly addressing the article in question, telling them they need to thoroughly research cosmology, or calling them lazy. Obvious bias is obvious.
The map thing was only brought up I believe to illustrate that flat earthers like Jeran making a big deal out of the fact that cosmologists haven’t solved everything seems a tad hypocritical. As usual, a potentially interesting topic is derailed.
Come to think of it, do you have anything to say about the actual topic? Did you watch the video or read the article?
THIS topic doesn’t require any prior knowledge of flat earth arguments at all. It might require flat earthers to know a bit about regular science though. Even if they didn’t, I guarantee any genuine flat earther questions on it would be met with actual explanations and links instead of accusations of laziness.