1

Flat Earth Q&A / What is the conspiracy?

« on: June 14, 2006, 02:57:45 PM »

it is kind of because the main flat earth argument is 'the earth is flat because it looks flat'.  good work!

I think the argument "It's flat because it looks flat" still easily wins over the argument "It's round because it is round". The former is at least based on observation, while the latter is purely a circular argument.

I just laughed so hard blood came out. This is the simple minded thought process that opposes scientific discovery? I'm sorry, but you don't have to see somthing for it to be there, of course your more than welcome to look at any of the images taken by our wonderful NASA, a group of great minds whos techinilogical wizardry should've shut this entire, "Movement" (In the wrong direction of course) down years ago.

And by the way UJB, "...free thinking christian individual..." is an oxymoron, hell, the fact that you condone rape means you aren't a christian. Infact, you never have been, nor will you ever be, because your beleif system is not only based on, 'facts" you've made up, but goes entirley against the aristocratic system which governs christian thoughts and morals.

Tis not an oxymorn at all, you are blinded by stereotypes that you've made up in your little liebral head. Rape is not denounced in the bible, however it is illegal in modern law. This is because the bible and modern law are fundamentally different. Really your jus' one of these weak 'modern' christians, or 'modern' apologetic liberals. There is only one common theme in your post, and that is that your a presumtive fool who does not know what or who he is talking about.
In Glory
-ujb.

edited for the sake of the simple minded folk...

you are a fat ass pederest bastard, you and everything about you disgusts me.

All of your beleifs are wrong, everything you beleive in is a lie, and i want to cum into your rotting mothers corpse.

2

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: The Cover Up

« on: June 13, 2006, 07:15:14 PM »

im not sure if this has been asked before but how does the government go about preventing people from coming across the Giant Ice Wall?

ssssssssshhhhhhhhhh......

<_< >_> <_<

(They'll here you )

3

Flat Earth Q&A / full moon.

« on: June 13, 2006, 07:12:24 PM »

Secondly, how exactly does one witness firsthand the curvature of the moon?

Are you calling the moon flat?

4

Flat Earth Q&A / What is the conspiracy?

« on: June 13, 2006, 02:02:20 PM »

it is kind of because the main flat earth argument is 'the earth is flat because it looks flat'.  good work!

I think the argument "It's flat because it looks flat" still easily wins over the argument "It's round because it is round". The former is at least based on observation, while the latter is purely a circular argument.

I just laughed so hard blood came out. This is the simple minded thought process that opposes scientific discovery? I'm sorry, but you don't have to see somthing for it to be there, of course your more than welcome to look at any of the images taken by our wonderful NASA, a group of great minds whos techinilogical wizardry should've shut this entire, "Movement" (In the wrong direction of course) down years ago.

And by the way UJB, "...free thinking christian individual..." is an oxymoron, hell, the fact that you condone rape means you aren't a christian. Infact, you never have been, nor will you ever be, because your beleif system is not only based on, 'facts" you've made up, but goes entirley against the aristocratic system which governs christian thoughts and morals.

5

Flat Earth Q&A / Are you having any success?

« on: June 13, 2006, 08:59:10 AM »

Success can be measured in many ways.

Im certain that a FE'er could consider their tactic of fighting proof with insubstantial and baseless claims succesfull, but only because they now have a list of prepared rebbudles.

Sadly though, none of them have any true meaning, because they where fabricated for the sake of argument.

6

Flat Earth Q&A / formation

« on: June 13, 2006, 08:21:56 AM »

what is this "force" everyone is talking about? it sounds like an idea, an idea that shouldn't be taken seriously

I'm rather certain they are speaking of centrifugal force, caused by the earths rotation.

I would hope you take something as elementry as that seriously, but sadly for the FE'ers, the earths rotation is only powerful enough to create a constant and smooth parabolic effect, eqaul in all directions, thus creating our true RE.

7

Technology, Science & Alt Science / The Earth is 157 years old

« on: June 12, 2006, 05:01:48 PM »

Somone's never heard of carbon dating

8

Flat Earth Q&A / Q to round-earthers

« on: June 12, 2006, 03:39:22 PM »

this message was edited, because i feel it was best presented as a PM

As far as width and curvature of the earth are concernde, i feel it is completley reasonable and logical to say it only appears flat because of its vast size.

9

Flat Earth Q&A / The Bible!

« on: June 09, 2006, 05:19:21 PM »

thats is because the center point of the molten globe is being held in pace,

Held by what?  Skyhooks?

if it were allowed to float freely in space, it would not be spinning only in one direction, it would be rotating as wellmaking all sides sping equally creating a sphere

I invite you to draw a picture of an object spinning in more than one direction in the absence of external forces.

Do indulge me with your talk of Skyhooks Erasmus!

They do sound ever so delightful, and would perhapse make an excellent addition to the FAQ page!

As far as somthing rotaiting in more than one direction without an external force, I'd have to point out that the poster was perhapse speaking of a wavelike motion, somthing along the lines of spinning a coin on a table.

It is, of course, inherently impossible to spin in more than on direction at any given interval of time, and the only way to change course would indeed be by means of some external force.

10

Flat Earth Q&A / Black Out

« on: June 09, 2006, 05:03:15 PM »

here's the biggest flaw in your system.
You have to realise how much bigger the sun is than the earth. for the sun to circulate, with its center over the equater, in an FE model, the entire earth would be in a stasis of daylight.

Which is why in the flat earth model, the sun is much smaller and much closer.

I want to tell you that if the moon can block out the sun during an eclipse, and we know how far the moon is because weve been there, and we can therfore see the proportionel distance and size changes needed to make this happen, that we do know for a fact the sun is MANY times bigger than the earth.

The problem here isn't in my logic, it's that you can call anything you want too a cover up.

Even that the juxtaposistion of a sun moving circularly around a disk shaped earth would produce intensley different visual phenominon than can be witnessed on any given day or night, you could just say that the government is just gasing us all, and using a giant space otter to push the sun while we are sleeping, and also he has mental powers to change our watches. But for WHAT!!?! What possible cover up would require lying about the shape of the planet?

11

Flat Earth Q&A / Black Out

« on: June 09, 2006, 04:49:48 PM »

Q: "Please explain sunrises/sunsets."

A: It's a perspective effect. Really, the sun is just getting farther away; it looks like it disappears because everything gets smaller and eventually disappears as it gets farther away.

If this were true, (which it's not), the sun would stay in place and "shrink."

You misunderstood what we meant. In the flat earth model the sun goes in a big circle around the equator (an imaginary line between the north pole and the ice wall). When we said "the sun is just getting farther away" we didn't farther away from the earth.

This fails to explain sunsets, but ive seen how those arguments go...

here's the biggest flaw in your system.
You have to realise how much bigger the sun is than the earth. for the sun to circulate, with its center over the equater, in an FE model, the entire earth would be in a stasis of daylight. The moon, which is as a speck of dust to the sun, would not be able to do anything (Ive heard somthing about cold light?) with the behemoth sun shining down.

12

Flat Earth Q&A / PROOF!

« on: June 09, 2006, 04:36:10 PM »

... thats actualy a pretty solid argument, though by the same principal i could say the earth was a cylinder...

alright, FE'ers win this round :p

13

Flat Earth Q&A / PROOF!

« on: June 09, 2006, 04:25:55 PM »

And what would have stopped Magellan from sailing around a flat earth?
Sailing around a flat earth is perfectly possible as long as you don't try to sail from north to south.

Actualy, it would have not been possible with a flat earth






You see, magellans voyage was entirley to the west, and he was able to return to the point from which he started.

14

Flat Earth Q&A / PROOF!

« on: June 09, 2006, 04:12:03 PM »

When did I say the earth was flat?

I don't understand why you would want too, "shoot holes" through a theory you did beleive in, and even if you don't beleive it, you have to agree that recorded knoledge does count as proof, unless somone cares to dismantle the story of magellan and show me why it didn't happen.

15

Flat Earth Q&A / PROOF!

« on: June 09, 2006, 04:06:48 PM »

Heresay is not proof.  You didn't sail with him.  You have no PROOF.  You have statements in books that said he sailed around the earth.  If you do have actual proof, show it.  How do you know the earth is round?  Someone told you it was.

According to your logic, all forms of recorded proof, of any kind, are irrelevant.  I guess i better start burning all my encyclopedias, and destroy the internet.

Besides, how do you know the earth is flat? Oh right, somone told you it was...

16

Flat Earth Q&A / PROOF!

« on: June 09, 2006, 03:57:02 PM »

I have a simple request

In the early 1500's Ferdinand Magellan, actualy did sail around the earth, PROVING that it is round. Infact, every day, planes cross horizontily and meet no "Ice walls".

Now, ive read your fAQ, ive looked at posts, and their are some clever little, "workarounds", but none of you have actualy tried to go entirley around the earth.

Do what Magellan did, because im sure that modern airplanes have some magic power to return to the other side of the dinner plate you think is your home.

If even one of you takes a boat, sails to the edge, and returns with proof, than congrats, you win.

Until than, I have proof you are wrong courtesy of a man with HUGE balls.
(Albeit, he may not have been out to prove you all are mentaly incapacitated)