Eye Safety Advisory: Warning

  • 47 Replies
  • 4949 Views
?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 6210
  • +14/-29
Re: Eye Safety Advisory: Warning
« Reply #30 on: April 09, 2024, 08:45:25 AM »
I think you both stared at the moon  :'(

Is there a cure? 

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Planar Moderator
  • 51172
  • +17/-18
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Eye Safety Advisory: Warning
« Reply #31 on: April 09, 2024, 10:12:51 AM »
You could try taking a nap with cucumber slices over your eyes.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 6210
  • +14/-29
Re: Eye Safety Advisory: Warning
« Reply #32 on: April 09, 2024, 11:34:11 AM »
Only if I can have my sleepytime tea and my dark chocolate first.  Some swing music in the background. 

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 6210
  • +14/-29
Re: Eye Safety Advisory: Warning
« Reply #33 on: April 10, 2024, 02:16:15 PM »

bulmabriefs144, still seeing dots from the last eclipse? 

Same thing.

The dot from your first photo.



Dot from second photo.


The dot I added next to your original dot.


*

bulmabriefs144

  • 4184
  • +8/-29
  • Roco the Fox
Re: Eye Safety Advisory: Warning
« Reply #34 on: April 12, 2024, 07:41:02 AM »
Quote
What part is balderdash?
Again, I said the only time a camera is an issue is if it passes the light to the observer. The most common way this happens is through the viewfinder, where it uses a lens or mirror to redirect the light to the viewfinder.

The part where you think that it passes light to the observer.

Light radiation (or glare) is reflected from certain objects. When I faced away from the sun, and held the Kindle towards the sun, I got glare (pretty profoundly too, to the point that I had to move the screen). When I had the Kindle facing the sun, I had what was basically a picture with alot of light and some prismatic color (from UV splitting). It was bright, but it wasn't transferring light. Computers, kindles, and most phones don't transfer light. They make pictures by procedure.

That is, if the camera analyzes the presence of white color, that square produces the code #000000. Teal? #37e49e. Red? #f10606.

It's a hexadecimal color code that is synthesizing color from the camera.

This is why you can look at the video without going blind. It's a synthetic image produced by code. It does produce blue light from Kindle, but not raw UV light you would get from staring directly at the sun. 

*

JackBlack

  • 24585
  • +23/-46
Re: Eye Safety Advisory: Warning
« Reply #35 on: April 12, 2024, 02:54:58 PM »
The part where you think that it passes light to the observer.
Which just demonstrates that you fundamentally fail to understand how cameras work.
Let me ask you this, if you used a mirror to look at the sun, do you think your eyes would be fine?

You can group cameras into basically 3 sets.
Set 1 - The viewfinder is separate to the main camera component. e.g. this one:

The light goes straight into that viewfinder, through a few lenses, and into your eye.
If you look at the sun through this, you can very easily go blind.
Set 2 - SLR - This uses a mirror to direct the light from the lens through a prism to the viewfinder. When you take a picture, that mirror moves out of the way. Again, this setup has the light go bounce off a few optical devices and go into your eye. If you look at the sun through this, you can go blind.
Set 3 - Digital "viewfinders" - This uses a camera to take a video feed, and then display that video feed on a screen. In this case, there is no path for the light from the sun to reach your eyes. The light reaching your eyes is produced by the camera, not the sun. So as long as you don't go out of the shadow of the camera, you are fine.

So again, what part was balderdash?
Do you think the camera will magically protect you if you are using set 1 or set 2?

Do you think you can use a mirror or a magnifying glass (or both) to look at the sun and you will be fine?

This is why you can look at the video without going blind.
Notice how I never said anything about the video? I talked about the camera. Depending on what type of camera you have,

*

Timeisup

  • 4048
  • +2/-1
  • You still think that. You cannot be serious ?
Re: Eye Safety Advisory: Warning
« Reply #36 on: April 13, 2024, 04:24:24 AM »
Hey everyone,

Just a quick reminder: Today, as a celestial event unfolds, countless round Earthers will risk damaging their eyes in the pursuit of their religious ceremonies during the eclipse. But here's the curious thing—no Flat Earthers will face such peril.

Isn't it fascinating how our perspectives influence our actions? While some look to the heavens in befuddled ignorance, we stand grounded on terra firma. What are your thoughts on what drives round earthers to organize mass blinding events?

Stay safe and keep questioning the curve!

So what you are saying is that you are going to pretend that a solar eclipse is not happening because you refuse to look at it through recommended filters. No one in their right mind looks at the sun with out taking precautions.

That said I think the real reason is you realise that solar eclipses and their predictions render all you believe null and void.

Is that not the case?

You have a theory. You test that theory by making a prediction of an event. The event then  happens precicly as predicted which goes a long way to validating the initial theory. Many other events are successfully predicted using the same methods which proves beyond any doubt that the theory and data behind the predictions are correct and 100% valid.

In the case of accurately predicted solar eclipses it follows that the conventional scientific view of the solar system is correct and your infinite earth flat earth notion is no more than a load of rather smelly bollocks.

The other interesting fact which obviously follows is that your flat earth belief is incapable of making any accurate predictions regarding solar eclipses or any other cosmic event are your beliefs have no relationship with reality.

"I can accept that some aspects of FE belief are true, while others are fiction."

Jack Black

Now that is a laugh!

*

bulmabriefs144

  • 4184
  • +8/-29
  • Roco the Fox
Re: Eye Safety Advisory: Warning
« Reply #37 on: April 13, 2024, 07:06:08 AM »
The part where you think that it passes light to the observer.
Which just demonstrates that you fundamentally fail to understand how cameras work.
Let me ask you this, if you used a mirror to look at the sun, do you think your eyes would be fine?

You can group cameras into basically 3 sets.
Set 1 - The viewfinder is separate to the main camera component. e.g. this one:

The light goes straight into that viewfinder, through a few lenses, and into your eye.
If you look at the sun through this, you can very easily go blind.
Set 2 - SLR - This uses a mirror to direct the light from the lens through a prism to the viewfinder. When you take a picture, that mirror moves out of the way. Again, this setup has the light go bounce off a few optical devices and go into your eye. If you look at the sun through this, you can go blind.
Set 3 - Digital "viewfinders" - This uses a camera to take a video feed, and then display that video feed on a screen. In this case, there is no path for the light from the sun to reach your eyes. The light reaching your eyes is produced by the camera, not the sun. So as long as you don't go out of the shadow of the camera, you are fine.

So again, what part was balderdash?
Do you think the camera will magically protect you if you are using set 1 or set 2?

Do you think you can use a mirror or a magnifying glass (or both) to look at the sun and you will be fine?

This is why you can look at the video without going blind.
Notice how I never said anything about the video? I talked about the camera. Depending on what type of camera you have,

What is balderdash is that when warning you, they don't say "Don't use SLR cameras or direct glass viewfinders." Like you did.
https://mashable.com/article/solar-eclipse-2024-dont-take-photos-phone
They say "Don't take  pictures of the eclipse with your phone, NASA warns."

That is patently untrue.

You can use most cameras with a digital viewfinder just fine. You can use pretty much all phones, as they pretty much all have a digital viewfinder. It is bright, yes, but it is more or less safe. 

This is NASA trying control the narrative and/or sell their glasses.

They later clarify that "it could damage the hardware." But when news articles are posted, most Americans do this.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/03/19/americans-read-headlines-and-not-much-else/
Americans read headlines. And not much else.

So when an article says instead of:
"Taking eclipse pictures with your phone could damage your phone."

They say:

Don't take  pictures of the eclipse with your phone, NASA warns.

Readers who don't delve deeper decide it has to do with eye damage. What? Americans are impatient!

In any case, I was told repeatedly by my mom that it wasn't safe to record the eclipse. Or that I should face away and do a backwards shot (now I have glare). That's how misled the public is by these sensational headlines. Seriously, just clarify "Don't use analog cameras to photograph the sun."

*

JackBlack

  • 24585
  • +23/-46
Re: Eye Safety Advisory: Warning
« Reply #38 on: April 13, 2024, 02:12:44 PM »
What is balderdash is that when warning you, they don't say "Don't use SLR cameras or direct glass viewfinders." Like you did.
https://mashable.com/article/solar-eclipse-2024-dont-take-photos-phone
They say "Don't take  pictures of the eclipse with your phone, NASA warns."
And why did they say that?
Not because it can damage your eyes, but because it can damage the sensor in the phone.

So yet again, you are blatantly lying about what is said.

Great job showing everyone you are a compulsive liar.


Readers who don't delve deeper decide it has to do with eye damage. What? Americans are impatient!
i.e. you are an idiot that doesn't bother reading your sources? Instead you find something you think supports your BS or just irrationally jump to conclusions?

Or are you just trying to suggest that the majority of the public are morons that don't bother reading, and you are just among them?

Re: Eye Safety Advisory: Warning
« Reply #39 on: April 14, 2024, 07:48:20 AM »
Wad very cool. And was also cool to see mercury and venus. Venus is currently in phase. An unknown phenomenon to round and flat earthers

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 6210
  • +14/-29
Re: Eye Safety Advisory: Warning
« Reply #40 on: June 13, 2025, 10:25:35 AM »




To be fair to Bulma.

The other day I got my first noticeable artifacts while trying to take a picture of the sun at sunset through the haze.






Crop zoom..


I guess the sensor had trouble with the colors at the boundaries of the disc of the sun vs the sky than usual.

I think the software with the phone for the camera tried to make the photo to vivid. 
« Last Edit: June 13, 2025, 10:27:46 AM by DataOverFlow2022 »

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Planar Moderator
  • 51172
  • +17/-18
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Eye Safety Advisory: Warning
« Reply #41 on: June 13, 2025, 12:21:29 PM »
Pls do not stare at the sun.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 6210
  • +14/-29
Re: Eye Safety Advisory: Warning
« Reply #42 on: June 13, 2025, 12:48:34 PM »

*

bulmabriefs144

  • 4184
  • +8/-29
  • Roco the Fox
Re: Eye Safety Advisory: Warning
« Reply #43 on: June 15, 2025, 02:25:51 AM »
Hey everyone,

Just a quick reminder: Today, as a celestial event unfolds, countless round Earthers will risk damaging their eyes in the pursuit of their religious ceremonies during the eclipse. But here's the curious thing—no Flat Earthers will face such peril.

Isn't it fascinating how our perspectives influence our actions? While some look to the heavens in befuddled ignorance, we stand grounded on terra firma. What are your thoughts on what drives round earthers to organize mass blinding events?

Stay safe and keep questioning the curve!

You are correct. I heard dire warnings about how you shouldn't try to photograph the thing directly without a filter. I did anyway, and nothing happened. I'll show it later. There is a black blob, reminiscent of Yu Yevon living within the sun. I will show it to you later.

...Later has come now.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/a7Fcku8LpztO/

As you can see, that's no moon. It's a moving blob of light(?) that they don't want you to see, so you're supposed to view with dark glasses too dark to see anything but bright light.

Past me was awesome.




?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 6210
  • +14/-29
Re: Eye Safety Advisory: Warning
« Reply #44 on: June 15, 2025, 03:27:14 AM »

Past me was awesome.



If your black dot is something that happen during the eclipse, then what is your working theory on what occurred in the image. 

*

bulmabriefs144

  • 4184
  • +8/-29
  • Roco the Fox
Re: Eye Safety Advisory: Warning
« Reply #45 on: June 15, 2025, 03:54:09 AM »
In all likelihood?

This:


Basically, it was a color or intensity that the Kindle couldn't understand or deal with, so it faked it out.

Sorta a "UV color is not in our palette" thing.

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 6210
  • +14/-29
Re: Eye Safety Advisory: Warning
« Reply #46 on: June 15, 2025, 04:04:13 AM »
In all likelihood?

This:


Basically, it was a color or intensity that the Kindle couldn't understand or deal with, so it faked it out.

Sorta a "UV color is not in our palette" thing.

Then why doesn’t it have graduations like my photo?

Crop zoom..



Added.  Where the pixilation is consistent with the amount of zoom. 
« Last Edit: June 15, 2025, 04:06:19 AM by DataOverFlow2022 »

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 6210
  • +14/-29
Re: Eye Safety Advisory: Warning
« Reply #47 on: June 15, 2025, 04:12:04 AM »
In all likelihood?



Didn’t you claim to have some sort of formal schooling in this department?  So, why make a big deal about a sensor anomaly?