Explain the poles?

  • 10 Replies
  • 5098 Views
?

Squibbo

  • 2
  • +0/-0
Explain the poles?
« on: April 13, 2024, 02:42:33 PM »
Why can the sun not set in Antarctica for several months at a time?

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26254
  • +6/-4
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: Explain the poles?
« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2024, 11:26:50 AM »
This is a claim not proven. First you need to prove the claim. However, you are not allowed to be in Antarctica except for touristic trips. In such an environment, we cannot stay in Antarctica long enough to prove or disprove what he says. In this case, everything said about Antarctica will remain nothing more than urban legends and globalist lies. We don't have to believe their lies. Only after an independent and free observation can we talk about the reasons if such a situation really exists.
1+2+3+...+∞= 1

Ignored:

Jura II (until 2031)
Bulma (Until 2030)
Jackblack (Until 2032)
JimmyTheLobster (temp, jura's alt)

?

Squibbo

  • 2
  • +0/-0
Re: Explain the poles?
« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2024, 12:23:13 PM »
In this case, everything said about Antarctica will remain nothing more than urban legends and globalist lies. We don't have to believe their lies.
Ah i see, so Antarctica isn’t observable and may not even exist. Thank you for your input

Re: Explain the poles?
« Reply #3 on: April 16, 2024, 10:48:43 AM »
Been lucky to have stayed in the
Yukon and Patagonia. Both in summer. Which was july and Jan respectively.  Both places were light well past midnight.

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Planar Moderator
  • 51029
  • +13/-12
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Explain the poles?
« Reply #4 on: April 16, 2024, 03:32:23 PM »
Been lucky to have stayed in the
Yukon and Patagonia. Both in summer. Which was july and Jan respectively.  Both places were light well past midnight.

Unless you have an FET explanation of the poles, it really doesn't matter where you've vacationed.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

Re: Explain the poles?
« Reply #5 on: April 16, 2024, 11:51:09 PM »
It could be related to the anti-sun. A dark star that shines heat and light that is below a wavelength we cannot read.

*

gnuarm

  • 458
  • +0/-0
Re: Explain the poles?
« Reply #6 on: April 23, 2024, 01:40:02 PM »
Been lucky to have stayed in the
Yukon and Patagonia. Both in summer. Which was july and Jan respectively.  Both places were light well past midnight.

Unless you have an FET explanation of the poles, it really doesn't matter where you've vacationed.

He is sharing his experiences, where the sun did not set at night in both extreme northern latitudes and extreme southern latitudes.  I think that does matter very much. 

Before a measurement can be explained, we need to make the measurement.  No?

*

gotham

  • 3624
  • +2/-0
Re: Explain the poles?
« Reply #7 on: April 23, 2024, 02:47:20 PM »
REers have a tendency to risk believability by focusing on incidents and locations where the sun doesn’t shine or can shine at different intensities, when formulating their claims.

As members read through the site and look at the study resources available, they can improve their FE knowledge.   
« Last Edit: April 23, 2024, 02:59:38 PM by gotham »

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Planar Moderator
  • 51029
  • +13/-12
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Explain the poles?
« Reply #8 on: April 23, 2024, 03:31:24 PM »
gnuarm, this is Flat Earth Q&A. If someone asks a question in the section of the forum, they are expecting an answer from flat earth theory. If you want to debate or discuss this topic, start a new thread in FE General, or FE Debate.

I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

Re: Explain the poles?
« Reply #9 on: June 03, 2024, 06:31:22 PM »
The monopole map is the wrong map, this is the approximately correct map, it is an improvement on the Sandokhan bi-polar map:

https://pin.it/7pSB5bcsm

The Sun does not orbit parallel to the Earth's plane, it rises in the east, follows a straight path over the equator at the equinoxes and in arcs over the tropics at the solstices, always making its natural variations. The Sun sets in the west and passes beneath the earth, where rotating etheric currents flow quickly causing the Sun to rise on the other side in a matter of seconds, the luminiferous ether is denser in the vicinity of the first firmament (the Sun is outside), thus the Sun's light and mirage are maintained for some time in the west while the Sun is simultaneously rising again in the east.

The density of the luminiferous ether is also the reason why the Sun does not significantly change its apparent size, causing a magnifying effect like a magnifying glass.

Electromagnetic acceleration is what makes the Sun appear to rise and set before it does so solidly.

 https://wiki.tfes.org/Electromagnetic_Acceleration

The Sun's illumination is not like a spotlight and its light does not reach the surface of the poles, the midnight Sun at both poles is caused by the reflection of the Sun on the moon Eos, there is one for each pole, Eos is also responsible for the auroras.
 https://brasilescola.uol.com.br/mitologia/eos.htm

Earthquakes are more common in the Pacific oceans (there are two) and nearby because the magnetism, heat and radiation from the Sun have affected the formation of Pacific tectonic plates, as they are very close to where the Sun passes.
 https://www.nationalgeographicbrasil.com/meio-ambiente/2023/02/quais-sao-as-3-regioes-com-mais-terremotos-do-mundo

*

gnuarm

  • 458
  • +0/-0
Re: Explain the poles?
« Reply #10 on: June 03, 2024, 10:04:05 PM »
The monopole map is the wrong map, this is the approximately correct map, it is an improvement on the Sandokhan bi-polar map:

https://pin.it/7pSB5bcsm

I'm not sure what to make of this map.  Are you the only person claiming this is the flat earth?


Quote
The Sun does not orbit parallel to the Earth's plane, it rises in the east, follows a straight path over the equator at the equinoxes and in arcs over the tropics at the solstices, always making its natural variations. The Sun sets in the west and passes beneath the earth, where rotating etheric currents flow quickly causing the Sun to rise on the other side in a matter of seconds, the luminiferous ether is denser in the vicinity of the first firmament (the Sun is outside), thus the Sun's light and mirage are maintained for some time in the west while the Sun is simultaneously rising again in the east.

I've been told to not "debate" flat earth ideas here, so I can't tell you what is wrong with this idea. 

Quote
The density of the luminiferous ether is also the reason why the Sun does not significantly change its apparent size, causing a magnifying effect like a magnifying glass.

I assume this is an idea you came up with?


Quote
Electromagnetic acceleration is what makes the Sun appear to rise and set before it does so solidly.

 https://wiki.tfes.org/Electromagnetic_Acceleration

I would recommend to not use flat earth wiki posts as your citations.  It's not like they are credible.


Quote
The Sun's illumination is not like a spotlight and its light does not reach the surface of the poles, the midnight Sun at both poles is caused by the reflection of the Sun on the moon Eos, there is one for each pole, Eos is also responsible for the auroras.
 https://brasilescola.uol.com.br/mitologia/eos.htm

What is this supposed to show? 


Quote
Earthquakes are more common in the Pacific oceans (there are two) and nearby because the magnetism, heat and radiation from the Sun have affected the formation of Pacific tectonic plates, as they are very close to where the Sun passes.
 https://www.nationalgeographicbrasil.com/meio-ambiente/2023/02/quais-sao-as-3-regioes-com-mais-terremotos-do-mundo

I can't read Spanish, so such sites are not of value to me.