Pangea and FE Theory?

  • 201 Replies
  • 43357 Views
?

vhu9644

  • 1011
  • +0/-0
  • Round earth supporter
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #150 on: May 02, 2011, 10:00:17 PM »
people i respect: Ski, Oracle, PizzaPlanet, Wendy

?

JoshuaZ

  • 351
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #151 on: May 03, 2011, 06:15:32 AM »
We know things...
enlighten me

If I had to make a guess, it is that NE was responsible for the recent outage here.

?

Around And About

  • 2615
  • +0/-0
  • Circular Logic Falls Flat
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #152 on: May 03, 2011, 06:33:01 AM »
It just doesn't seem like NE would do that, perpetually exasperated troll that he might've been. But at any rate, I'm missing his posts.  :(
I'm not black nor a thug, I'm more like god who will bring 7 plagues of flat earth upon your ass.

?

karl

  • 74
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #153 on: May 03, 2011, 06:56:48 AM »
this is the best forum ever, seriously, I am hooked, it's like watching a paraplegic trying to cartwheel and inventing ever more elaborate theories as to how he could do it, if only he could ignore certain physical facts, then it would be true..

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #154 on: May 03, 2011, 03:10:13 PM »
this is the best forum ever, seriously, I am hooked, it's like watching a paraplegic trying to cartwheel and inventing ever more elaborate theories as to how he could do it, if only he could ignore certain physical facts, then it would be true..

Please watch your tone.  I admit, I giggled at your comparison of a REer trying to argue his theory to a paraplegic trying to do cartwheels, but such a crude and indecent analogy just doesn't belong in the serious discussion boards, however apt it may be.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

?

c47man

  • 90
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #155 on: May 03, 2011, 03:14:30 PM »
I giggled at your comparison of a REer trying to argue his theory to a paraplegic trying to do cartwheels

Ha-ha. I see what you did there.

?

karl

  • 74
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #156 on: May 04, 2011, 10:29:48 AM »
this is the best forum ever, seriously, I am hooked, it's like watching a paraplegic trying to cartwheel and inventing ever more elaborate theories as to how he could do it, if only he could ignore certain physical facts, then it would be true..

Please watch your tone.  I admit, I giggled at your comparison of a REer trying to argue his theory to a paraplegic trying to do cartwheels, but such a crude and indecent analogy just doesn't belong in the serious discussion boards, however apt it may be.

so why have you just repeated and recycled it yourself, surely you should be setting an example?

?

Ali

  • 237
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #157 on: May 05, 2011, 02:18:39 AM »
If tectonic plate movement does occur (can you explain earthquakes any other way?), as some of you admit,, how long do the FE'ers think the world would remain disc shaped and the ice wall intact?
« Last Edit: May 05, 2011, 02:40:03 AM by Ali »

?

A.R. Wallace

  • 253
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #158 on: May 05, 2011, 03:53:24 AM »
10, 20 or 50 thousand years?  What's the big deal?

?

Ali

  • 237
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #159 on: May 05, 2011, 04:08:14 AM »
The longer the time, the more plate movement occurs. Without enclosure, the plates would have no problem in constantly moving outwards, constantly increasing the Earth's diameter and resulting in cooling of the core and thinning of the total depth (with subsequent loss of local gravity). After 5 billion years, the Earth would so thin that it would long ago have broken into shards like a well cooked poppadum.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #160 on: May 05, 2011, 12:43:01 PM »
Lucky for us, then, that the continents do not in fact float around all over the place.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

JoshuaZ

  • 351
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #161 on: May 05, 2011, 12:51:48 PM »
Lucky for us, then, that the continents do not in fact float around all over the place.

Are you seriously arguing against plate tectonics? Are you claiming the geologists are in the big Conspiracy now also? Are they lying about magnetic bands demonstrating sea floor spreading? And the timeline of fossils being in locations consistent with continental drift is also part of conspiracy or is it just more evidence that will be ignored. I'm a little confused as to why you are making this argument since naive plate tectonics does not by itself run into any problems with a flat earth.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #162 on: May 05, 2011, 01:04:34 PM »
Lucky for us, then, that the continents do not in fact float around all over the place.

Are you seriously arguing against plate tectonics? Are you claiming the geologists are in the big Conspiracy now also? Are they lying about magnetic bands demonstrating sea floor spreading? And the timeline of fossils being in locations consistent with continental drift is also part of conspiracy or is it just more evidence that will be ignored. I'm a little confused as to why you are making this argument since naive plate tectonics does not by itself run into any problems with a flat earth.

Fossilized human remains are found on almost every continent on Earth. Are you suggesting that continental drift happened recently enough and vigorously enough to distribute human remains all over the Earth? There's a much more straightforward and sensible explanation.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 43503
  • +20/-33
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #163 on: May 05, 2011, 03:18:12 PM »
Lucky for us, then, that the continents do not in fact float around all over the place.

Sadly for Japan, they do.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

Around And About

  • 2615
  • +0/-0
  • Circular Logic Falls Flat
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #164 on: May 05, 2011, 03:45:20 PM »
Lucky for us, then, that the continents do not in fact float around all over the place.

Sadly for Japan, they do.

Such a wet blanket.  :(

But, an effective argument.
I'm not black nor a thug, I'm more like god who will bring 7 plagues of flat earth upon your ass.

?

JoshuaZ

  • 351
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #165 on: May 05, 2011, 04:46:38 PM »
Lucky for us, then, that the continents do not in fact float around all over the place.

Are you seriously arguing against plate tectonics? Are you claiming the geologists are in the big Conspiracy now also? Are they lying about magnetic bands demonstrating sea floor spreading? And the timeline of fossils being in locations consistent with continental drift is also part of conspiracy or is it just more evidence that will be ignored. I'm a little confused as to why you are making this argument since naive plate tectonics does not by itself run into any problems with a flat earth.

Fossilized human remains are found on almost every continent on Earth. Are you suggesting that continental drift happened recently enough and vigorously enough to distribute human remains all over the Earth? There's a much more straightforward and sensible explanation.

Fossil human remains have well-understood migratory patterns. And humans are the exception, not the rule. Most species have much smaller ranges. The key issue is that many extinct species have *small* ranges (often less than a full continent) but occurred on multiple continents. Moreover, the different mapping data from this for different species is interconsistent- one gets the same overall map for many different species from many different niches.

Also, you completely ignored the issue of magnetic bands.

Please keep in mind that in the early part of the 20th century, most scientists did not think that any form of plate tectonics was correct. By 1975  almost every geologist accepted plate tectonics because the evidence had convinced them. If there were other plausible interpretations of the data that didn't require accepting a new very broad hypothesis they would have done that. 

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #166 on: May 06, 2011, 06:34:12 PM »
Fossil human remains have well-understood migratory patterns. And humans are the exception, not the rule. Most species have much smaller ranges. The key issue is that many extinct species have *small* ranges (often less than a full continent) but occurred on multiple continents.

This is because these species developed the ability to travel across the ocean more quickly than some others.  Or perhaps they did not particularly care for the inland style of living.

Moreover, the different mapping data from this for different species is interconsistent- one gets the same overall map for many different species from many different niches.

Yes, when dinosaurs migrated they would have taken their crops and livestock with them, otherwise how would they have survived in new and unfamiliar surroundings?

Please keep in mind that in the early part of the 20th century, most scientists did not think that any form of plate tectonics was correct. By 1975  almost every geologist accepted plate tectonics because the evidence had convinced them. If there were other plausible interpretations of the data that didn't require accepting a new very broad hypothesis they would have done that. 

By 1975 almost every geologist had accepted that the Earth was a whirling, spinning space ball, but that does not make it true, does it?
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

c47man

  • 90
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #167 on: May 06, 2011, 06:41:03 PM »
There is no evidence that dinosaurs, a group which never invented so much as a simple tool, gained the ability to cross entire oceans when it is obvious from their fossils that multiple landlocked (i.e., cannot swim!) species were found on multiple continents, which themselves even visually appear to fit together.

There is also no evidence of dinosaurs practicing agriculture or keeping livestock. Yes I understand that this was probably a trolling comment, but in case it wasn't, I'm just saying that there is no empirical evidence. If there is, provide it and I'll shut up.

By 1975, EVERY geologist had agreed that the Earth was round, because every shred of evidence and math they used showed them that it was, and nothing - nothing - demonstrated anything to the contrary.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #168 on: May 06, 2011, 06:48:45 PM »
There is no evidence that dinosaurs, a group which never invented so much as a simple tool, gained the ability to cross entire oceans when it is obvious from their fossils that multiple landlocked (i.e., cannot swim!) species were found on multiple continents, which themselves even visually appear to fit together.

It is not true that dinosaurs have never invented so much as a simple tool; in fact, it is demonstrably false.  There is ample footage of dinosaurs building all manner of wonderful tools, they build a great many ingenious structures all the time.

The inability to swim does not stop somebody from building a raft in order to traverse the high seas, people do it all the time.  Most 16th century sailors were unable to swim, it is only a relatively recent cultural phenomenon that a sailor is expected to be able to swim (and a silly one too, because the whole point of a boat is that one does not have to swim).

There is also no evidence of dinosaurs practicing agriculture or keeping livestock. Yes I understand that this was probably a trolling comment, but in case it wasn't, I'm just saying that there is no empirical evidence. If there is, provide it and I'll shut up.

I disagree.  If you look at sea-faring migratory societies such as the pilgrim fathers and the Egyptians you will see that in the vast majority of cases they made extensive use of agriculture.  This is because if every body is hunting and gathering all the time, it leaves a very limited amount of time to practice building boats.

By 1975, EVERY geologist had agreed that the Earth was round, because every shred of evidence and math they used showed them that it was, and nothing - nothing - demonstrated anything to the contrary.

There are many geologists who to this day do not believe that the Earth is round. Get your facts right.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

c47man

  • 90
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #169 on: May 06, 2011, 07:06:45 PM »
It is not true that dinosaurs have never invented so much as a simple tool; in fact, it is demonstrably false.  There is ample footage of dinosaurs building all manner of wonderful tools, they build a great many ingenious structures all the time.

Provide even one frame of footage, even the slightest legitimate evidence that this is true, and I will delete my account and make a new one that is pro FE.

The inability to swim does not stop somebody from building a raft in order to traverse the high seas, people do it all the time.  Most 16th century sailors were unable to swim, it is only a relatively recent cultural phenomenon that a sailor is expected to be able to swim (and a silly one too, because the whole point of a boat is that one does not have to swim).

Of course, but those are people. People thousands of years and many generations beyond the inception of simple toolmaking, a feat that dinosaurs never achieved.

I disagree.  If you look at sea-faring migratory societies such as the pilgrim fathers and the Egyptians you will see that in the vast majority of cases they made extensive use of agriculture.  This is because if every body is hunting and gathering all the time, it leaves a very limited amount of time to practice building boats.

Again, those are people, not dinosaurs. This was well documented for ancient humans, but completely undocumented for dinosaurs (which went extinct millions and millions of years ago, before humans walked the planet)

There are many geologists who to this day do not believe that the Earth is round. Get your facts right.

Please provide a link to a geologist who believes the Earth is flat, who has said so since 1975, and who has a demonstrable (i.e., available for us to verify) degree in geology.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #170 on: May 06, 2011, 07:20:50 PM »
It is not true that dinosaurs have never invented so much as a simple tool; in fact, it is demonstrably false.  There is ample footage of dinosaurs building all manner of wonderful tools, they build a great many ingenious structures all the time.

Provide even one frame of footage, even the slightest legitimate evidence that this is true, and I will delete my account and make a new one that is pro FE.

Here is a video of some dinosaurs building a house.  You can see they are very artful at using their mouths and hands in the construction process:

In that video they are actually building sex houses, in their culture it is normal to build a new house every time you want to have sex, because they don't like to have sex in old or ugly looking houses.  It explains that bit at the end.

I look forward to debating with you on your new account, but please negotiate with the administrators to delete you old one because having more than one account is against the site rules.

The inability to swim does not stop somebody from building a raft in order to traverse the high seas, people do it all the time.  Most 16th century sailors were unable to swim, it is only a relatively recent cultural phenomenon that a sailor is expected to be able to swim (and a silly one too, because the whole point of a boat is that one does not have to swim).

Of course, but those are people. People thousands of years and many generations beyond the inception of simple toolmaking, a feat that dinosaurs never achieved.

Dinosaurs most certainly mastered the art of simple toolmaking, as I can amply demonstrate.  They also had many more millions of years than humans to perfect all manner of ingenious crafts.

I disagree.  If you look at sea-faring migratory societies such as the pilgrim fathers and the Egyptians you will see that in the vast majority of cases they made extensive use of agriculture.  This is because if every body is hunting and gathering all the time, it leaves a very limited amount of time to practice building boats.

Again, those are people, not dinosaurs. This was well documented for ancient humans, but completely undocumented for dinosaurs (which went extinct millions and millions of years ago, before humans walked the planet)

You seem to be quite racist about the abilities of dinosaurs. Just because they aren't mammals it doesn't mean they can't do all the things you can do.

There are many geologists who to this day do not believe that the Earth is round. Get your facts right.

Please provide a link to a geologist who believes the Earth is flat, who has said so since 1975, and who has a demonstrable (i.e., available for us to verify) degree in geology.

There are plenty of us on this site.  I have not said so since 1975 because I was a reformed globularist who only recanted after the millenium; I don't know about Tom Bishop, Dionysius or Crustinator for example, it is possible that they've been saying so since 1975 but I don't actually know their personal histories.  You should ask them.  Other famous geologists from history include Samuel Rowbotham (who was saying it since the mid 19th century) and Charles K Johnson (who said it during the period you are talking about).
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

c47man

  • 90
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #171 on: May 06, 2011, 07:32:43 PM »
Here is a video of some dinosaurs building a house.  You can see they are very artful at using their mouths and hands in the construction process:

In that video they are actually building sex houses, in their culture it is normal to build a new house every time you want to have sex, because they don't like to have sex in old or ugly looking houses.  It explains that bit at the end.

I look forward to debating with you on your new account, but please negotiate with the administrators to delete you old one because having more than one account is against the site rules.

When I say dinosaurs, I mean what the general public and nearly every human being on the planet will mean. Not modern day birds, the descendents of dinosaurs. Yes, I am aware that birds or officially a type of dinosaur. I should have been more specific in my post. I am referring to ancient dinosaurs. The ones that went extinct. The ones whose fossils, from which we can tell they could not swim and probably could not manipulate tools, are still found across multiple continents.

In fact, not only dinosaurs, but many ancient fossilized remains of all manner of creatures have the same phenomenon. Some were amphibious, many were not.

Dinosaurs most certainly mastered the art of simple toolmaking, as I can amply demonstrate.  They also had many more millions of years than humans to perfect all manner of ingenious crafts.

Nowhere in that video did even birds, the "dinosaurs" with the longest time to have evolved, create and use simple tools.

You seem to be quite racist about the abilities of dinosaurs. Just because they aren't mammals it doesn't mean they can't do all the things you can do.

Dinosaurs were a group of different species, with different races. Racism is not the correct term, and you are using it to troll. At least try, man. And is not the fact that they aren't mammals that makes me say they can't do the things I can. The fossil record and the sum total of all paleontological, archaeological, biological, and historical evidence is what makes me say that they couldn't do all the things that I can do.

There are plenty of us on this site.  I have not said so since 1975 because I was a reformed globularist who only recanted after the millenium; I don't know about Tom Bishop, Dionysius or Crustinator for example, it is possible that they've been saying so since 1975 but I don't actually know their personal histories.  You should ask them.  Other famous geologists from history include Samuel Rowbotham (who was saying it since the mid 19th century) and Charles K Johnson (who said it during the period you are talking about).

I am well aware that you people call yourselves geologists. What I asked for was proof that you are geologists.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #172 on: May 06, 2011, 07:41:52 PM »
Here is a video of some dinosaurs building a house.  You can see they are very artful at using their mouths and hands in the construction process:

In that video they are actually building sex houses, in their culture it is normal to build a new house every time you want to have sex, because they don't like to have sex in old or ugly looking houses.  It explains that bit at the end.

I look forward to debating with you on your new account, but please negotiate with the administrators to delete you old one because having more than one account is against the site rules.

When I say dinosaurs, I mean what the general public and nearly every human being on the planet will mean. Not modern day birds, the descendents of dinosaurs. Yes, I am aware that birds or officially a type of dinosaur. I should have been more specific in my post. I am referring to ancient dinosaurs. The ones that went extinct. The ones whose fossils, from which we can tell they could not swim and probably could not manipulate tools, are still found across multiple continents.

In fact, not only dinosaurs, but many ancient fossilized remains of all manner of creatures have the same phenomenon. Some were amphibious, many were not.

Dinosaurs did not go extinct, they evolved into birds (modern dinosaurs).  It is not my fault if the general public do not know what a dinosaur is.

Dinosaurs most certainly mastered the art of simple toolmaking, as I can amply demonstrate.  They also had many more millions of years than humans to perfect all manner of ingenious crafts.

Nowhere in that video did even birds, the "dinosaurs" with the longest time to have evolved, create and use simple tools.

Here is another video clip from the same series in which a dinosaur uses tools for farming insects.  As if building a sex house wasn't enough.


You seem to be quite racist about the abilities of dinosaurs. Just because they aren't mammals it doesn't mean they can't do all the things you can do.

Dinosaurs were a group of different species, with different races. Racism is not the correct term, and you are using it to troll. At least try, man. And is not the fact that they aren't mammals that makes me say they can't do the things I can. The fossil record and the sum total of all paleontological, archaeological, biological, and historical evidence is what makes me say that they couldn't do all the things that I can do.

Racists often try to use biological and historical evidence to back up their horrible arguments.  You will not win me over to your hate with this sort of argument, however.

There are plenty of us on this site.  I have not said so since 1975 because I was a reformed globularist who only recanted after the millenium; I don't know about Tom Bishop, Dionysius or Crustinator for example, it is possible that they've been saying so since 1975 but I don't actually know their personal histories.  You should ask them.  Other famous geologists from history include Samuel Rowbotham (who was saying it since the mid 19th century) and Charles K Johnson (who said it during the period you are talking about).

I am well aware that you people call yourselves geologists. What I asked for was proof that you are geologists.

You did not, in fact, ask for proof that we were geologists.  However, I think you will find that the definition of a geologist is that they study the shape of the Earth.  If you need evidence of that, you can look on the rest of this website, because we have all made lots of posts showing that we have been studying that.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

c47man

  • 90
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #173 on: May 06, 2011, 07:57:24 PM »
Dinosaurs did not go extinct, they evolved into birds (modern dinosaurs).  It is not my fault if the general public do not know what a dinosaur is.
Quote

Yes they did. Nearly all species of dinosaur went extinct in the Cretaceous period. Only a few species survived the extinction event, including the ancestors of modern day birds. Aside from birds there were over 500 distinct genera and over 1,000 different species of non-avian (not a bird!) dinosaurs. Almost none of them survived the extinction event.

Here is another video clip from the same series in which a dinosaur uses tools for farming insects.  As if building a sex house wasn't enough.

Well, you got me there. I did not know that birds used tools. This is still a far cry from building ocean-faring rafts/boats though. And considering the birds are the longest lived and highly evolved group of dinosaurs, I don't think it would be reasonable to claim that ancient dinosaurs could travel across oceans. Especially when no evidence exists to support that claim.

Racists often try to use biological and historical evidence to back up their horrible arguments.  You will not win me over to your hate with this sort of argument, however.

You know who else uses biological and historical evidence? Everyone else. You forgot paleontological and archeological by the way.

You did not, in fact, ask for proof that we were geologists.  However, I think you will find that the definition of a geologist is that they study the shape of the Earth.  If you need evidence of that, you can look on the rest of this website, because we have all made lots of posts showing that we have been studying that.
...
Please provide a link to a geologist who believes the Earth is flat, who has said so since 1975, and who has a demonstrable (i.e., available for us to verify) degree in geology.

Did you miss that?

And in case degrees in geology are no longer required to be a geologist:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geologist

Geologist - "A geologist is a scientist who studies the solid and liquid matter that constitutes the Earth as well as the processes and history that has shaped it."

Geologist Education - "Their training typically includes significant coursework in physics, mathematics, and chemistry, in addition to classes offered through the geology department; historical and physical geology, igneous and metamorphic petrology and petrography, hydrogeology, sedimentology, stratigraphy, mineralogy, palaeontology, physical geography and structural geology are among the many required areas of study. Most geologists also need skills in GIS and other mapping techniques. Geology students often spend portions of the year, especially the summer though sometimes during a January term, living and working under field conditions with faculty members (often referred to as "field camp"). Many non-geologists often take geology courses or have expertise in geology that they find valuable to their fields; this is common in the fields of geography, engineering, chemistry, urban planning, environmental studies, among others."

So please. Prove to me that you are a geologist, and not somebody who says they are in order to attempt to accrue creditability for your assertions.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #174 on: May 06, 2011, 08:06:49 PM »
Dinosaurs did not go extinct, they evolved into birds (modern dinosaurs).  It is not my fault if the general public do not know what a dinosaur is.

Yes they did. Nearly all species of dinosaur went extinct in the Cretaceous period. Only a few species survived the extinction event, including the ancestors of modern day birds. Aside from birds there were over 500 distinct genera and over 1,000 different species of non-avian (not a bird!) dinosaurs. Almost none of them survived the extinction event.

Many ancient types of human have died out as well (such as the neanderthal), but I am sure you have no trouble accepting that their culture would have had features which are now lost to us.  Yet we retain many of the most basic things which we shared with them, such as our tool use.

Here is another video clip from the same series in which a dinosaur uses tools for farming insects.  As if building a sex house wasn't enough.

Well, you got me there. I did not know that birds used tools. This is still a far cry from building ocean-faring rafts/boats though. And considering the birds are the longest lived and highly evolved group of dinosaurs, I don't think it would be reasonable to claim that ancient dinosaurs could travel across oceans. Especially when no evidence exists to support that claim.
[/quote]

Why do you think birds are the most highly evolved group of dinosaurs?  When they took to the skies they became comparitively lazy and lost many of their technologies because they didn't need to build vehicles any more.

Racists often try to use biological and historical evidence to back up their horrible arguments.  You will not win me over to your hate with this sort of argument, however.

You know who else uses biological and historical evidence? Everyone else. You forgot paleontological and archeological by the way.

You think your racist arguments are backed up by paleontological and archaelogical evidence as well?  Your hubris is astonishing.

Geologist - "A geologist is a scientist who studies the solid and liquid matter that constitutes the Earth as well as the processes and history that has shaped it."

I am a scientist.

Geologist Education - "Their training typically includes significant coursework in physics, mathematics, and chemistry, in addition to classes offered through the geology department; historical and physical geology, igneous and metamorphic petrology and petrography, hydrogeology, sedimentology, stratigraphy, mineralogy, palaeontology, physical geography and structural geology are among the many required areas of study. Most geologists also need skills in GIS and other mapping techniques. Geology students often spend portions of the year, especially the summer though sometimes during a January term, living and working under field conditions with faculty members (often referred to as "field camp"). Many non-geologists often take geology courses or have expertise in geology that they find valuable to their fields; this is common in the fields of geography, engineering, chemistry, urban planning, environmental studies, among others."

So please. Prove to me that you are a geologist, and not somebody who says they are in order to attempt to accrue creditability for your assertions.


I have carefully studied all of the subjects which you listed (except ones which are false science).  I do not have skills in the Conspiracy's mapping systems, on the contrary I use only the very best maps.  As for field-camp, I am always out and about in the wilderness looking very carefully at the Earth.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

c47man

  • 90
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #175 on: May 06, 2011, 08:23:45 PM »
Responding to you point by point is futile. I must say, you are a surprisingly effective troll. Well, I hope you're a troll. If you really believe this stuff, then I feel sorry for you. It must be such a strange way to live.

I was hoping to post on this forum and have real debates with serious people. If you're going to treat this forum like your own personal playground for aggravating honest people, I don't need to be a part of it anymore.

No, I am not retreating. You have done nothing to demonstrate the flatness of earth or to support any other theory. The few times you post evidence it is of a satirical, ironic, wordtwisting, pedantic sort. Never the kind of thing that would simply put your opposition to rest. Every move you make is clearly calculated to illicit a (normally hostile) reaction from the other side.

I'm tired of it, and I am going to spend my time on other things.

Have a good life James, I hope you find happiness, regardless of your method!

?

JoshuaZ

  • 351
  • +0/-0
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #176 on: May 06, 2011, 08:35:53 PM »
Yes, there are birds that can engage in rudimentary tool building. Corvids sometime do this in the wild. That says nothing at all about the sort of toolbuilding necessary to build boats. And trying to claim that nestbuilding is at all akin to genuine toolbuilding is just silly since nestbuilding is an evolved instinct; birds who have never been around a nest and are raised by humans will still engage in nest building behavior.Even by the (low) standards of this forum, this is ridiculous. 

Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #177 on: June 13, 2011, 09:19:11 AM »
Lucky for us, then, that the continents do not in fact float around all over the place.
I'd also like to pull you up on magnetic banding.

 Furthermore I'd also like you to explain how with out plate tectonics the differences between the calc-alkali and theoliietic melt systems occur.
« Last Edit: June 13, 2011, 09:24:44 AM by Geology_Undergrad »

*

Ichimaru Gin :]

  • Undefeated FEer
  • Planar Moderator
  • 8932
  • +2/-0
  • Semper vigilans
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #178 on: June 13, 2011, 06:18:48 PM »
Yes, there are birds that can engage in rudimentary tool building. Corvids sometime do this in the wild. That says nothing at all about the sort of toolbuilding necessary to build boats. And trying to claim that nestbuilding is at all akin to genuine toolbuilding is just silly since nestbuilding is an evolved instinct; birds who have never been around a nest and are raised by humans will still engage in nest building behavior.Even by the (low) standards of this forum, this is ridiculous.
Dinosaurs have been observed using tools. Of course not to up to our calibre currently but tools nontheless.
I saw a slight haze in the hotel bathroom this morning after I took a shower, have I discovered a new planet?

?

sillyrob

  • Official Member
  • 3771
  • +0/-0
  • Punk rawk.
Re: Pangea and FE Theory?
« Reply #179 on: June 13, 2011, 07:26:48 PM »
Do you have evidence of non-avian dinosaurs building and using tools?