1

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Is the validity of one's proofs linked to a non science profession?

« on: March 19, 2016, 01:53:00 AM »

Tom Bishop bought his Master's Degree from an online vendor and the FE'ers treat him like the New Einstein.

You sound like you are jelly.  Why so jelly?

I think Woody's post reveals that not only is Tom Bishop jelly, he's in a bowl covered with custard.

Lol, he's also got a masters in Geology too.

Quote from: Tom Bishop on April 13, 2007, 06:14:41 PM
I myself believe in a Flat Earth not because of religion, but as a result of my own observations, experiments, and scientific proofs. I'm an atheist who came to the conclusion of a Flat Earth because it makes vastly more scientific sense than a Round Earth. I hold a Masters in Geology from U.C. Berkley.

2

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Is the validity of one's proofs linked to a non science profession?

« on: March 18, 2016, 03:12:58 PM »

Lol, yep.

I've just read the intro, what a load of stinking BS....

3

Flat Earth General / Re: round-earthers think they are sideways in the universe

« on: March 18, 2016, 02:54:15 PM »

He's having a stroke. Ignore him.

I think he's having a smoke too.

4

Flat Earth General / Re: Rockets cannot work in a Vacuum.

« on: March 14, 2016, 06:26:06 AM »

Correct; well done little parrot!

It must also be noted that a rocket does not work by firing Water out of its arse...

I think you will find that it is in fact Fire, not Water, that comes out of its arse.

Do you really expect me to prove that Water is not Fire now?

Or will you just drop your latest bullshit strawman terrible false analogy & get to grips with the scientific principles involved?

LOL!!!

No, of course you won't.

The JREF-ugee war-cry: 'Bullshit, strawmen & terrible false analogies FTW!'.

What useless specimens you all are...

Toodle-pip, Useless Clowns!

I quoted it because it's easy to debunk.

I will refer to this later.

5

Flat Earth General / Re: Rockets cannot work in a Vacuum.

« on: March 14, 2016, 02:00:57 AM »

That sounds an awful lot like work,

It would if any energy was lost during the process.

But it isn't so it's not.

but of course we all know that work can't happen during free expansion.

Are you saying it does?

I hope not, as it would be untrue.

'The fact that there is no change in the total energy when a gas expands into a vacuum shows there is no repulsive force between the molecules.': Peter Fireman,writing in the  Journal of Physical Chemistry.

Note that the above statement also smashes your 'clinking clanking billiard ball molecules bouncing round the nozzle' bullshit false analogy.

It's all very simple: a rocket, like every other thing that moves, does so by creating friction upon the medium through which it moves.

In the case of a rocket, this is the atmosphere.

Remove that medium & motion becomes impossible.

Newton & Free Expansion both agree with me on this.

If only you lot could come up with ONE Law of Physics that supports your case...

That would be nice!

But no; all you have is gish-galloping, gaslighting & gang stalking...

Which is 'scientific' in a way; just the wrong one.

Toodle-pip, JREF-ugees!

"It's all very simple: a rocket, like every other thing that moves, does so by creating friction upon the medium through which it moves.

In the case of a rocket, this is the atmosphere.

Remove that medium & motion becomes impossible."

6

Suggestions & Concerns / Re: Very Serious Concern.

« on: March 13, 2016, 07:33:04 PM »

Did admin ever look into this?

7

Flat Earth General / Re: Rockets cannot work in a Vacuum.

« on: March 13, 2016, 07:31:41 PM »

papa.

What is your highest level of education to date?

8

Suggestions & Concerns / Re: Very Serious Concern.

« on: March 13, 2016, 05:26:41 PM »

Wow, look at how keen a bunch of ROUND EARTHERS are to get me off the FLAT EARTH forum they incessantly troll & thought-police!

LOL!!!

You really do not realise how completely insane & corrupt you appear, do you?

I knew this'd be lulzy; I never knew it'd be this good though...

You just incriminate yourselves further with every post, don't you?

You lot have to be mentally-deficient; no way are normal people this OCD & lacking in self-awareness.

I wish I never found this forum, it's my guilty pleasure.

9

Flat Earth General / Re: Rockets cannot work in a Vacuum.

« on: March 13, 2016, 05:14:00 PM »

the experiment has been repeated hundreds if not millions of times

Cool story bro...

Millions of people testing rockets in fake home-made vacuum chambers?

Sounds legit.

Stick to the sci-fi, Loser.

"fake home-made vacuum chambers"

So people trying to mislead, or are you doubting that a DIY chamber is a fair test?

10

Flat Earth General / Re: Rockets cannot work in a Vacuum.

« on: March 12, 2016, 04:55:34 AM »

LOL!!!

I did answer his deliberately incorrectly-phrased bullshit question.

But now you're pretending I didn't too...

Of course, there's no way you're just another sock-puppet shill gang-stalking me with strawman bullshit & lies, is there?

After all, you personally saw teh Ecks-fifteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeen & played mother-hen to a nest of Atom bombs, didn't you?

And you have the most not-at-all-made-up-by-an-AI-program name on the forum too.

Just LMFAO at how lame & shit at your jobs you all are!

Who the fuck do you think you're talking to?

Who the fuck do you think would fall for a single word of your bullshit?

I swear to God I would LOVE to get you in an interrogation room to hear you try this pompous gobshite schtick to my face...

Now THAT really would be fun!

Toodle-pip, worst disinfo-agents in teh 'Rowndd annd Prwowd' world!

Interrogate me? Why so I can laugh myself to death?  You're entertaining, I'l give you that.

I grew up with Space Program. I lived in not 10 miles from the Rocketdyne (later North American Rockwell) Santa Susanna Engine Test Facility in hills above of Simi Valley. My Dad, worked at Rocketdyne, I had the engine drawings the whole 9 yards. I understood more about rockets by age 10 than you ever will.

As for nukes, I've got an Air Force DD214 I'll bring to the interrogation, which of course you will immediately declare a CGI forgery. All evidence that doesn't fit your fantasy must at all cost be declared fake.

So I'll give you credit that you are also predictable too.

Might as well give you one more thing to build your stress levels so you can vent here.  My IQ is 132

Just stop feeding him, would be better if we all just blocked him?

Papa is nothing but a troll, a troll with some serious issues (check his latest 'walls are closing in' I'm being watched thread)

11

Suggestions & Concerns / Re: Very Serious Concern.

« on: March 11, 2016, 06:39:18 PM »

Stfu.

This is what matters:

Please look at the latest posts by myself & TylerJRB on the thread 'rockets cannot work in a vacuum' in flat earth general.

TylerJRB clearly replies to a post I was writing BEFORE I even posted it.

How can this happen unless what I write is being monitored as I write it?

I have suspected this for months but this is the first solid proof I have obtained.

What the hell is going on with this place?

Are all these infiltrators going to be evicted or what?

Still no word from the mods/admins oh WHAT a surprise.

THIS IS A TOXIC SHITHOLE DO NOT JOIN IF YOU ARE A FLAT EARTHER IT IS NOT FOR YOU.

FIND A PLACE WHERE YOU ARE SAFE & WELCOME THIS IS NOT IT!

I REPEAT THIS IS NOT IT!

Until the place is cleansed how can I say anything else?

Mods? Admins?

LOL!!!

There aren't any & they don't care about you...

TOXIC SHITHOLE!!!

UNCLEAN!!!

UNCLEAN!!!

Why do you even come here? That fake wife of yours must be getting bored of the lack of attention you show here 

12

Suggestions & Concerns / Re: Very Serious Concern.

« on: March 11, 2016, 04:09:19 PM »

^More psychopathic mirroring.

^Have you read ALL my posts in order to repeat them back to me one after another?

Seriously; this place is FUCKED.

No free thinker or flat earther in their right mind would join such a cesspool of disinfo-scum.

So, mods/admins; you gonna clear all the sock-poopets & shills out or are you gonna just admit defeat?

I don't care; you're the 'flat earthers'...

If you care about flat earth then surely you'd want this place to be at least slightly welcoming to flat earthers, yes?

Then do something about it.

Start by perma-banning markjo & Rayzor.

Make someone like sceptimatic a mod too, rather than fraudulent scum like tehEnjynerr or jane...

At least SHOW you care, eh?

LOL!!!

Lulz ahoy...

Why don't you put in for being a mod?

13

Suggestions & Concerns / Re: Very Serious Concern.

« on: March 11, 2016, 01:08:19 PM »

And you seem very familiar, 'Doooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooood'.

Jesus Christ, just give it up will you?

It's getting genuinely embarrassing.

The use of sock-puppet armies to control forums & Wikis is a well-documented FACT.

EVERYBODY knows it happens.

Markjo is an ex-mod here & Rayzor is some kinda computer-geek ffs.

Face the Truth: this forum is rotten to the core & needs a major clear-out.

Because a small handful of people are making it a toxic environment for ANY free-thinker or flat earther.

It is a SHITHOLE.

If the mods & admins cannot see that then it's time to call it quits.

I await their response with keen anticipation of lulz...

Toodle-pip, sock-poopets & Losers!

I only come here for random lols.

THIS FORUM IS YOUR LIFE, sad isn't it?

I hope the mods do perm ban all the non flat earthers including you?

I'm trying to free you from this nightmare!

14

Suggestions & Concerns / Re: Very Serious Concern.

« on: March 11, 2016, 01:01:41 PM »

The world is out to get you it seems papa?

Why would I even have alts on here?

15

Suggestions & Concerns / Re: Very Serious Concern.

« on: March 11, 2016, 09:49:55 AM »

You seem very paranoid dude.

16

Flat Earth General / Re: The ISS is a Gulfstream jet.

« on: February 24, 2016, 10:13:17 AM »

I like how papa cliams how he cares little what we think, yet he is the biggest attention whore on the forum.

Maybe papa should put more effort into saving his marriage 

17

Flat Earth General / Re: A visual guide to Dual Earth Theory

« on: February 24, 2016, 10:09:56 AM »

Is it possible to get pro artist concepts knock up, to give a more clear look at the model?

18

Flat Earth General / Re: Rockets cannot work in a Vacuum.

« on: February 22, 2016, 12:06:42 PM »

Coming from a military family, it seems that you should recognize the necessity of respecting proper authority.

Coming from a military family, I recognise the necessity of reacting appropriately to correct Information.

As well as being permanently vigilant against enemy Disinformation.

Which is why you Disinfo-Scum will never beat me.

Cos I got your number.

And you hate me for it.

Hence all your gaslighting & gang stalking.

Oh look, here's some more:

Rockets don't work in a vacuum, space travel is impossible and the ISS is apparently a plane with a big spotlight attached to it...
Papa isn't looking for facts, he makes assumptions without evidence or any knowledge in a given subject area.
He is a sociopath, just set him to enemy and ignore him.

All you got is Lying & Bullying, basically...

How do you think that'll work out for you?

Toodle-pip, Psychopathic Liars!

FITE ME M9

19

Flat Earth General / Re: Rockets cannot work in a Vacuum.

« on: February 22, 2016, 11:32:46 AM »

Rockets don't work in a vacuum, space travel is impossible and the ISS is apparently a plane with a big spotlight attached to it...

Papa isn't looking for facts, he makes assumptions without evidence or any knowledge in a given subject area.

He is a sociopath, just set him to enemy and ignore him.....

20

Flat Earth General / Re: The ISS is a Gulfstream jet.

« on: February 21, 2016, 09:29:30 PM »

"The ISS is a Gulfstream jet."

You are jrowe and I claim my £5

21

Flat Earth General / Re: A visual guide to Dual Earth Theory

« on: February 20, 2016, 03:38:24 AM »

DET is pure fantasy, dreamed up by jrowe, the guy that not so long ago believed in fairies.....

22

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Gravitational waves.

« on: February 19, 2016, 03:19:48 PM »

We don't care.

+1

Jrowe, you need to dream up a new model, maybe quad earth theory? DET is old news...

23

Flat Earth General / Re: Rockets cannot work in a Vacuum.

« on: February 12, 2016, 02:12:48 PM »

Newtons Cradle does demonstrate conservation of energy, but it ain't a closed system.

If there is no such thing as a closed system, there is no such thing as conservation of momentum.

Do we agree that the Newtons Cradle isn't perpetual?

It's a device/educational tool.

24

Flat Earth General / Re: Rockets cannot work in a Vacuum.

« on: February 12, 2016, 01:48:16 PM »

Newtons Cradle does demonstrate conservation of energy, but it ain't a closed system.

25

Flat Earth General / Re: Rockets cannot work in a Vacuum.

« on: February 12, 2016, 01:13:59 PM »

Just lol at legion getting destroyed over and over 

Better message your papa 

I got destroyed did I? Keep dreaming.

Does Newton's Cradle demonstrate conservation of momentum?

Yep.

26

Flat Earth General / Re: Rockets cannot work in a Vacuum.

« on: February 12, 2016, 12:53:38 PM »

Just lol at legion getting destroyed over and over 

Better message your papa 

27

Flat Earth General / Re: Rockets cannot work in a Vacuum.

« on: February 12, 2016, 12:47:29 PM »

I didn't think newtons cradle was a closed system

Well then, you are lost. No surprise there.

Evidence?

On your way anti-science buffoon.

It's ok, I know the truth.

http://science.howstuffworks.com/newtons-cradle5.htm

"The reason it's not, though, is that the law of conservation only works in a closed system, which is one that is free from any external force -- and the Newton's cradle is not a closed system. As Ball Five swings out away from the rest of the balls, it also swings up. As it does so, it's affected by the force of gravity, which works to slow the ball down."

28

Flat Earth General / Re: Rockets cannot work in a Vacuum.

« on: February 12, 2016, 12:45:55 PM »

I didn't think newtons cradle was a closed system

Well then, you are lost. No surprise there.

Evidence?

29

Flat Earth General / Re: Rockets cannot work in a Vacuum.

« on: February 12, 2016, 12:38:27 PM »

I didn't think newtons cradle was a closed system

30

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: Tinfoil Hat Chemtrails.

« on: February 12, 2016, 12:06:00 PM »

No winners in war