The party is over.
Let us remember the discussion we had here a long time ago...
Not so. In the right circumstances refraction can continue to refract light indefinitely, parallel to the earth's surface. If the earth were flat, the refraction would eventually cause the light to be pushed to the ground, but on a curved surface, the refraction continues to refract the light parallel to the earth's surface and for great distances.
To talk about ice crystals, with an explosion at some 7 km in the atmosphere on one side of the globe, and a very clear view of the initial trajectory/flash of the explosion from the other side of the hypothetical globe, means that you have no explanation for the facts involved here.
According to your explanation, we should have a 24 hour a day constant sunlight...this is what you wrote:
In the right circumstances refraction can continue to refract light indefinitely, parallel to the earth's surface.
Certainly the sun's rays of light (official theory) will be parallel to some portion of the surface at some time in the earth's rotation...that is why I invited you to think.
The fact that the glow persisted for days, IS DUE to influence of the telluric currents which were activated (received more energy) from Tesla's ball lightning.
Your explanations evade the following very obvious fact: If the light from the Sun could not reach London due to curvature and/or any light reflection phenomena, then certainly NO LIGHT from an explosion which occurred at some 7 km altitude in the atmosphere could have been seen at all, at the same time, on a spherical earth.
HOW did the light travel from point A to point B in the atmosphere? Through which medium?
What is actually light, and what is magnetism?
These are questions which the official science has failed to answer ever since Maxwell's original equations were modified/altered/truncated.
Here is the proper explanation of magnetism and light:
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php/topic,30499.msg1495370.html#msg1495370The latest laboratory information about magnetism, the double helix theory of subquark strings:
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php/topic,58190.msg1489714.html#msg1489714More information here:
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php/topic,58190.msg1489785.html#msg1489785Light travels through double helix (double torsion) subquark strings which fill every nanometer of aether (search for the proofs of the existence of aether in my messages, please): the glow was an activation of these strings, which persisted for days, due to the energy it injected in those very strings.
HOWEVER, the very trajectory of the object was seen BEFORE THE EXPLOSION EVER TOOK PLACE, between 0:00 am and 0:15 am (London time) - the explosion itself occurred at 7:15 - 7:20 am (Tunguska time):
“Sir,--I should be interested in hearing whether others of your readers observed the strange light in the sky which was seen here last night by my sister and myself. I do not know when it first appeared; we saw it between 12 o’clock (midnight) and 12:15 a.m."
INSTANTANEOUSLY, the explosion itself caused these phenomena all over Europe:
In London on the night of June 30th the air-glow illuminates the northern quadrant of the heavens so brightly that the Times can be read at midnight. In Antwerp the glare of what looks like a huge bonfire rises twenty degrees above the northern horizon, and the sweep second hands of stopwatches are clearly visible at one a.m. In Stockholm, photographers find they can take pictures out of doors without need of cumbersome flash apparatus at any time of night from June 30th to July 3rd.
If the light from the Sun could not reach London due to curvature and/or any light reflection phenomena, then certainly NO LIGHT from an explosion which occurred at some 7 km altitude in the atmosphere could have been seen at all, at the same time, on a spherical earth.
http://www.halexandria.org/dward232.htmHerdsman in the
Gobi desert to the south described a fireball streaking across the sky along a flight path (based on a later reconstruction) at about 10o, just slightly east of true north. Along this direction, the object approached Keshma from the south. Then the object was observed by others moving very nearly due east toward Preobrazhenka. This was followed by the object moving slightly north of due west toward Vanavara. The explosion itself was oval shaped, suggesting a prior motion in the westerly direction.
With a distance of 2000 km, and an altitude of 2 km, the visual obstacle will measure 275 km, nothing could have been seen from that distance (the explosion itself occurred at an altitude of 7 km).
Eyewitness account:
Nizshne-Karelinskoye (465 km). Extremely bright (it was impossible to look at it) luminous body was seen rather high in the north-western sky soon after 8 a.m. It looked like a tube (cylinder) and for 10 minutes moved down to the ground. The sky was clear, but only in the side, where the body was seen, a small dark cloud was present low above the horizon.
While coming to the ground, the body dispersed (flattened) and at this place a large puff of black smoke appeared. Then a flame emanated from this cloud.
500 meter altitude - 11.6 km visual obstacle
800 meter altitude - 10.4 km visual obstacle
1000 meters altitude - 9.7 km visual obstacle
At around 7:15 a.m.,
Tungus natives and Russian settlers in the hills northwest of Lake Baikal observed a column of bluish light, nearly as bright as the Sun, moving across the sky. About 10 minutes later, there was a flash and a loud "knocking" sound similar to artillery fire that went in short bursts spaced increasingly wider apart.
http://www.salem-news.com/articles/june302008/tunguska_day_6-30-08.phpThat is when Tungus natives and others living in the hills northwest of Russia's Lake Baikal reported seeing a column of bluish light, that they described as being almost as bright as the Sun, moving across the sky.
A few minutes later they reported a flash and a sound that many said resembled artillery fire. The accompanying shock wave broke windows thousands of miles away from the impact zone, and knocked countless numbers of people to the ground.
Even if we take a 560 km distance to Tunguska, and a 1 km altitude (although Lake Baikal is located at some 435 meters in elevation), the visual obstacle will measure 15.5 km, no way for anybody located at Lake Baikal to have seen the explosion itself.
Let us ascend to 1,6 km in altitude at Lake Baikal; even then, the visual obstacle will measure 13.66 km.
As if this wasn't enough, the very trajectory of the ball lightning DEFIED attractive gravity 10 minutes prior to its explosion.
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php/topic,3152.msg1404164.html#msg1404164http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php/topic,3152.msg1404740.html#msg1404740